Very interesting. EBK 360 WOW! I just wonder is it really necessary to have so high rpm. I always felt that ET1 cleaned very well. However my EBK 340 seems to do a bit better, but I am not sure.
I feel like the Sebo is one of the best built, if not the best, and has great features like the removable brushroll but I feel like it's performance is below that of the Lindhaus or WW. I do have to wonder how all of the RPMS change under load too.
I actually prefer the ET-1, but my reasoning and impressions might be due to the relatively small opening seeming accelerating the CFM/sq. inch at the nozzle and really seeming to increase the efficacy. It also seems to create a very well balanced seal with a variety of carpet types.
Very interesting. EBK 360 WOW! I just wonder is it really necessary to have so high rpm. I always felt that ET1 cleaned very well. However my EBK 340 seems to do a bit better, but I am not sure.
I feel like the Sebo is one of the best built, if not the best, and has great features like the removable brushroll but I feel like it's performance is below that of the Lindhaus or WW. I do have to wonder how all of the RPMS change under load too.
I actually prefer the ET-1, but my reasoning and impressions might be due to the relatively small opening seeming accelerating the CFM/sq. inch at the nozzle and really seeming to increase the efficacy. It also seems to create a very well balanced seal with a variety of carpet types.
@@ABG2412 That is sensible
@@Blackheartvacsdepends on what it's attached to