Christie's idea really was an ingenious one. The biggest disadvantage of tanks even today is their short service intervals due to to immense amount of wear placed on the tracks and drivetrain. A tank that could skip being moved long distances by a tank hauler could have a huge advantage on the 20th century battlefield. Unfortunately the convertible tread design of the prototypes had severe weight limitations, and neither the tracks nor the road wheels performed optimally on either terrain. Christie's innovations still live on to this day in other forms though.
Clearly the j walter christie tank. The basis for the Russian BT and T34 tanks. The BT even kept the option to convert between tracks and using the wheels without the tracks on the road for the large speeds demonstrated here. They dropped that feature for the T34, probably because Russia didn't have many roads that were good enough. Still arguably the fastest tank ever built.
@@vadosvados1229 bt ant t34 - completely different in construction, sir, it's like i can say you that m3 Stuart is prototype of m4 Sherman, it would be stupid, right?
Классическая компоновка. но здесь он легкий, с "жестяной" броней. А при пушке, из которой нужно стрелять на ходу, при надежном, заданном бронировании, тогда эти задачи потянут за собой другие решения. Если вспомнить немецкую технику с двойным рядом катков - они там были не от каприза дизайнера.
Ah the Christie tank, the Father of the BT tanks, the Prototype BT that would evolve into the Famous T34. This tank was a great idea and is responsible for the Legendary Tanks that came after it. Nice to see it in Action as it was 93 years ago.
Many years ago i bought a model of this tank just to make something. When at home i open the box and I discover that can remove tracks to run on road i become fascinateb by this design. A really interesting piece of engenering.
Это было сделано для экономии ресурса гусениц в те времена они были очень ненадежными и нуждались в замене каждые 300 километров пробега. Поэтому идея была такая доехать до поля боя на колесах, потом одеть гусеницы и идти в бой.
@@2003AudiS3 It was good at that time... we also do not use other systems that were this tank competition and were mass produced in WW2 -> M4 suspension...
It would be great if there's any footage of the one and only test "flight" of the M.1932 Flying Tank. It is the only tank to "fly" under its own power. Bought by the Soviets for evaluation, after the US military rejected it.
in modern standards that should be a armoured car I know that was a tank and know there was a reason for a Calvary and a BT-series. just my initial thoughts of seeing that tank.
Ну... Нет, советский танковая школа пошла бы в сторону развития т 28 (не путать с "черепахой" Америки) и т 35... Возможно т 34 был бы, но с другой шасси, так как если не было м 1928/1930 то и комиссары не взяли бы это, так что скорей всего была торсионная подвеска на т 34 либо использовали бы немецкие наработки по шахматному расположения шасси. Т 34 появился бы, так как Кошкин был жив (главный конструктор танка т 34). Хотя, я вспомнил танк BT-SV так что думаю т 34 возможно имел вид pz так как наклонная Броня в первый рвз появился на BT-SV. Это интересно рассуждения
BT-7 was an upgrade of BT-5 and the first modification was BT-2 -> oryginal christie tanks purchased from Christie were the BT-1 as BT stands for "fast tank".
@@Vankaev_RUclips It is christie tank... BT-2 was a christie tank with bigger turret as Soviets wanted stronger gun as christie tank got only small 37mm gun. So Soviets designed bigger turret for long 45mm cannon.
It's easy to make a fast tank. The problem is making a tank that is fast while still being strong enough to withstand attack and not needing a 54,000hp engine to make it go fast....
No, and yes. No because these vehicles were not adopted by the US, whom these vehicles were originally meant for. Yes because the Russians based their BT series on the Christie designs but fared badly during the fighting on the Eastern Front.
@@anaveragesoviettankfromthe70s Well, mostly due to poor logistics, worn down vehicles (some of the tanks still on the roster of tank/mechanised divisions were almost a decade old when the Germans attacked) and generally spread out forces in several echelons,so Germans both overall and exponentially locally outnumbered the Red army (yes, despite the prominent narative,at least until the Moscow counteroffensive, Red army was significantly outnumbered by it's axis opponents,only it managed to fairly effectively replace at least it's manpower losses).BT-2/5/7 tanks weren't certainly suitable for fighting significantly heavier panzers with much better local air and artillery support.
Id say its either the M1928 or the M1930 Christie tank here. Really interesting to see how this thing really drove.
it's the M1931 at the beginning, and the last clip is M1928
@@AyamBetina-ni4nt Later sold to the Soviets to become the BT-1 tank.
Bt5
Это bt 2
Obviously that’s a Panzerkampfwagen V Panther! You must not know your tanks!!
Christie's idea really was an ingenious one.
The biggest disadvantage of tanks even today is their short service intervals due to to immense amount of wear placed on the tracks and drivetrain. A tank that could skip being moved long distances by a tank hauler could have a huge advantage on the 20th century battlefield. Unfortunately the convertible tread design of the prototypes had severe weight limitations, and neither the tracks nor the road wheels performed optimally on either terrain. Christie's innovations still live on to this day in other forms though.
Could you send me a link to tanks using an innovation of the Christie suspension? I didn't know we still used the method in anything today
what is amazing the christie type suspension can drive without tracks
Just look up the Wikipedia article on it
Its the bt-2 because the original wasn’t able to reach 100kmh
T-34
Clearly the j walter christie tank. The basis for the Russian BT and T34 tanks.
The BT even kept the option to convert between tracks and using the wheels without the tracks on the road for the large speeds demonstrated here. They dropped that feature for the T34, probably because Russia didn't have many roads that were good enough.
Still arguably the fastest tank ever built.
Yes, we USA no buy your design. We Soviet Union buy.
agree about bt, but t34 don't have any similarities with bt or christie tank
@@vanechkapupssik2958 yea, cuz it already done tank, when BT was like a prototype, test, base. T-34 just combine all + from prototypes.
@@vadosvados1229 bt ant t34 - completely different in construction, sir, it's like i can say you that m3 Stuart is prototype of m4 Sherman, it would be stupid, right?
@@vanechkapupssik2958 man yea, but i have 100000 power because i choose vikings
Imagine driving on the motorway, you look to your right and just see a tank overtake you
Would be possible with how underpowered most of the americans cars were until 90s
@@divinehatred6021I bet many would still risk to overtake and risk getting a faceful of APFSDS because their pride as a road rager mandates it
@@Mordecrox Karens and Big Altima Energy drivers be like : SIGN ME UP SIGN ME UP
Don't even think about brake checking him either.
And you're also on Bugatti. Driving at a speed of 350 km/h💀
We need this in gran Turismo
be careful what you wish for...as this one will surely crush its competitors
Long live BT-2
Great tank design
those tracks are horrible
Yes
@@maxsjoberg788 it’s 1930s give it a rest
@@FunnyMomentsTV2000 😂seriously right?
@@maxsjoberg788 no
And because of this bad boy, years down the line you get the best tank, the BT-7
Т-34,Т-54, Т-62....Т-14
@@АлексейЛушин-ы9г shut up, he said the best tank, not cheap knockoffs!
@@friendlycrusader8892 The T-34 was based off the BT series but the other tanks listed is unrelated to the сhristie.
@@friendlycrusader8892 BT7 is cheaper... its a light tank and it has thin armour. while T34 and the others are medium tanks with more armour.
@@NoName-O1OOO11O none better than glorious bt7
Классическая компоновка. но здесь он легкий, с "жестяной" броней. А при пушке, из которой нужно стрелять на ходу, при надежном, заданном бронировании, тогда эти задачи потянут за собой другие решения. Если вспомнить немецкую технику с двойным рядом катков - они там были не от каприза дизайнера.
Ah the Christie tank, the Father of the BT tanks, the Prototype BT that would evolve into the Famous T34. This tank was a great idea and is responsible for the Legendary Tanks that came after it. Nice to see it in Action as it was 93 years ago.
I was gonna say: this must be why the bt5 and 7 are such goblins
pathe carefully making the best historical documentaries ever
Any road-going vehicle of this era can do all the offroading that we get promised today.
Many years ago i bought a model of this tank just to make something. When at home i open the box and I discover that can remove tracks to run on road i become fascinateb by this design. A really interesting piece of engenering.
Это было сделано для экономии ресурса гусениц в те времена они были очень ненадежными и нуждались в замене каждые 300 километров пробега. Поэтому идея была такая доехать до поля боя на колесах, потом одеть гусеницы и идти в бой.
@@Nikolai7373 ah great !!! I'm always interested in how the designers find solution to overcome problems. A very valuable info. thank you.
It's good to see a working tank with no music, edited audio and video effects!
You know you could just mute the video
@@wersabwersab6923 ...No
It's hard to believe it was 9 years ago
I can imagine just how state-of-the-art and impressive this thing's engineering was back when it was created. That suspension goes really hard!
- Hans we need more armor !
- Better transmission you say ?
What a unit. Look at it go!
Such a pleasant engine sound!
Cool! Soviet BT-7 was based on this and thankfully there are working BT-7 in Russia and Belarus today
That ain't a tank
That's a 2L bottle
Me; *Casually drives my BT through the McDonald's drive through*
it is not BT... it is the original Christrie tank...
US Army: Well, you are good, but no, we don't want you.
Christie Model A: Fine then, AHNUU CHEEKI BREEKI IV DAMKE!
Starts playing hardbass
It’s quick but it isn’t good, there is a reason why nobody uses Christie suspension anymore
@@2003AudiS3 It was good at that time... we also do not use other systems that were this tank competition and were mass produced in WW2 -> M4 suspension...
without its turret, looks like a pretty cool vehicle.
Not even a javelin could catch it
Amazing how one race car maker created the best tank in the inter war period and in war thunder
It would be great if there's any footage of the one and only test "flight" of the M.1932 Flying Tank. It is the only tank to "fly" under its own power. Bought by the Soviets for evaluation, after the US military rejected it.
evaluation? LoL... they mass produced it... BT-2, BT-5 and BT-7, they added bigger and stronger gyn so the tower was Soviet but rest was not.
Wow basic geometry really pays off when you use cubes and cylinders
Oh how so much would change only 10 years later, and even after that.
Pretty much a hotrod with a cannon armor and was in military use. Great job making a hotrod as a tank!
Walter Christie designed and built a transverse-engined front wheel drive racing car in 1904.
in modern standards that should be a armoured car
I know that was a tank and know there was a reason for a Calvary and a BT-series.
just my initial thoughts of seeing that tank.
When you messed up the tank motor and the sports car motor:
This tank was really strong! It can even kill leopard 2 from side
I just can’t stop imagining the driver going “wheeeeee!” the whole drive
As a resident of Chicago, how would I go about getting one of those?
Imagine your the soldier and saw this tank running towards you
見たかった動画が有るとは
この時代でこれだけ動くとは
クリステー凄過ぎ
この戦車無ければ、当時のソ連は無くなっていたかなと
Ну... Нет, советский танковая школа пошла бы в сторону развития т 28 (не путать с "черепахой" Америки) и т 35... Возможно т 34 был бы, но с другой шасси, так как если не было м 1928/1930 то и комиссары не взяли бы это, так что скорей всего была торсионная подвеска на т 34 либо использовали бы немецкие наработки по шахматному расположения шасси.
Т 34 появился бы, так как Кошкин был жив (главный конструктор танка т 34).
Хотя, я вспомнил танк BT-SV так что думаю т 34 возможно имел вид pz так как наклонная Броня в первый рвз появился на BT-SV. Это интересно рассуждения
Still if we want to talk about fast but dangerous, i would recomend RBT-5
Image you see this thing in your rear view mirror catching up to you on the highway
Did I just see a steering wheel?
Still can’t imagine the guy who drove a BT-7 off a ramp into the water
Is that actually original sound?
"Don't underestimate the Christie Suspensions!"
That's amazing for 1931
the predecessor to the BT-7 tank
BT-2
60mph top speed in a time where cars went about 60mph top speed aswell lmao
Nope, 30-40mph was typical top speed of a car back then. Ford T was not able to do 60mph and it was the most popular car at that time...
It had to be that fast, to get away from intense fight scenery immediately. 😏
Prototype of the BT-7 Soviet light tank
Looks like bt 5 or bt 7 to me
BT-2?
mah BT7 with a sports car engine
Superior high mobility. They never saw it comin!
Russia: can I copy your home work?
America: sure just don’t make it obvious.
Russia: BT7
BT-7 was an upgrade of BT-5 and the first modification was BT-2 -> oryginal christie tanks purchased from Christie were the BT-1 as BT stands for "fast tank".
This one looks like it's the same size with an suv or pickup
Yes, I would like one please.
The future of Soviet tank industry.
Can you imagine that tank came to be t-90m 80 years later 😮 it's like it's baby-time footage
И с тем же двигателем(правда форсированным) полная деградация констукторской мысли - за 96 лет нулевой прогресс.
I cant see 60kph tractor running nowadays
It looks so cute. I want to buy and ride one
That's the fastest casket I've ever seen
Damn lol thats pretty fast 😂
there it goes
1931: Boy these new-fangled tanks sure are impressive! Here's hoping we'll never have to use them ever again.
1939:
Preston Tucker?
Это опытный образец bt 5?
Похоже на то
It's an Américan tank
@@Lesocialist no way...
Это оригинальный танк кристи, который в последствии совок купил и из него уже были сделаны бт-ки
Imagine those people seen what it evolved into
I saw a modern yt video of a BT-7 tank just driving on it's wheels in Russia somewhere.
Are Soviet's BT tanks inspired from this?
The person who designed this chassis sold the design to Soviet Union
@@grievetan ooh, that's why BT tanks are similar with this tank
Bro's going to the D point
My head hurts just imagining being inside
"Fort on wheels" until it gets hit by an 88cm
this tank sounds more like a race car
Soviets be like "let us ctrl c ctrl v this thing".
they purchased it from Christie...
Oh, that is a BT-2🥰🥰🥰
Its a very early bt2 prototype
@@Vankaev_RUclips It is christie tank... BT-2 was a christie tank with bigger turret as Soviets wanted stronger gun as christie tank got only small 37mm gun. So Soviets designed bigger turret for long 45mm cannon.
When you have a race car designer make a tank:
Would like to see the original video of the flying BT-7
back when tanks were more developed than cars
В 1931 году в серию пошли танки БТ, танк Кристи в сравнении, так шутка изобретателя.
Шутка это когда они с 3-4 пазиками воевали, а так ничем кардинально танк Кристи от ранних БТ не отличался
That white bit a the end was tge bombs dropping
It's easy to make a fast tank. The problem is making a tank that is fast while still being strong enough to withstand attack and not needing a 54,000hp engine to make it go fast....
My abominations that were never meant to be made, but still made in hoi4 nsb, such as the Maus capable of reaching speeds of 40 km/h
That was the newest Lamborghini in 1931 XD
this is what we should add this tank on WW2
my brain for a moment thought "oh look at BT5" then i realized that the british didnt have BT5s
Back when even the tanks were art Deco
Aint got nothing on the bt5
Me on my way to defend the D point.
bt 5 prototype?
So cute 🥰🥰
Ah the sports cars of tanks
That tank was used in WW2?
If yes, would be a legendary hero.
Yes, no
No, and yes.
No because these vehicles were not adopted by the US, whom these vehicles were originally meant for.
Yes because the Russians based their BT series on the Christie designs but fared badly during the fighting on the Eastern Front.
@@anaveragesoviettankfromthe70s they did purchase the chassis and then turned it intro their own BT series, the US didnt wanted it anyways tho
@@anaveragesoviettankfromthe70s The BT series were excellent scout/cavalry tanks, they just weren't suited to fighting a defensive war.
@@anaveragesoviettankfromthe70s Well, mostly due to poor logistics, worn down vehicles (some of the tanks still on the roster of tank/mechanised divisions were almost a decade old when the Germans attacked) and generally spread out forces in several echelons,so Germans both overall and exponentially locally outnumbered the Red army (yes, despite the prominent narative,at least until the Moscow counteroffensive, Red army was significantly outnumbered by it's axis opponents,only it managed to fairly effectively replace at least it's manpower losses).BT-2/5/7 tanks weren't certainly suitable for fighting significantly heavier panzers with much better local air and artillery support.
This looks almost as fast as an abrams
Me on my way to cap D point
Is that a bt7?
Bt5
Barely looks like it would withstand a standard rifle round of the time.
When my Japanese tank evolves:
Imagine being run over by this little tank
A beans can with a peashooter
When American racer became Instrumental in Soviet mechanised technology.
Tanks are useless if your enemy has Man-pads and mines...
*LEEEEEEEEET’S DO IIIIIIIIIIIT!!!!!!*