Was The Critic and Duckman actually ahead of their time or were they dealing with the same crapola current American culture is dealing with? I'd say instead of pretending that the animators of 90s late night cartoon shows were having clairvoyant visions of the future, it makes far more sense to admit that nothing ever truly changes. Jean Baptiste was spot on when he made the quote, "The more things change the more they stay the same."
If the movie used to be a TV Show, just don't go. = *Jem & the Holograms* After Roman Numeral II, give it a rest. = *Ice Age* If it's a re-make of a classic, RENT THE CLASSIC. = *Beauty and the Beast* Tell them you want stories about people, not $100,000,000 of stunts and explosives. = *many Michael Bay directed films* IF THE MOVIE STINKS, JUST DON'T GO. = *The Emoji Movie*
There should be a video game version of this with the AVGN... AVGN: "It's very simple if you stop buying shitty fucking games, they'll stop making shitty fucking games." Bobby Kotick: "Uh-oh! The jig is up!" *jumps out window*
+TheY2AProblem It's funny reading this now, given how James has stated he won't be watching the new Ghostbusters movie because he's pretty sure it will stink.
“If it’s a remake of a classic, tent the classic.” My response to Disney’s “live action” remakes. The Lion King was a great animated film, why do we need a CGI remake?
@@thechuckjosechannel.2702 Give me a break, I've seen better animated timeless classics in Japan like Dragon Ball than that stupid furry cat movie, Heck even the Disney Afternoon was way more entertaining classics for me than the stupid classic Disney movies themselves.
It shows how these claims that "movies nowadays suck, movies in my time were better" are total bullshit, Hollywood was always like this, it's just that nostalgia makes us only remember the good stuff. Plus, one thing got better, at least nowadays, special effects and CGI can't sell a bad movie anymore, say watch you want about all of those reboots and superhero movies, people are watching them because of the characters, not the special effects.
I agree! i have to see and pay to see these half assed liveaction soulless moneygrab remakes of Disney classics and will continue to do so and stick to the classics. Eventually the returns on these remakes will diminish and should send Disney the message and can cancel future remakes and do different projects just like Zootopia and all
Sometimes the remakes are better than the classic. I prefer the 1990s version of Night of the Living Dead to the original. The female protagonist becomes more active, an how can you beat Tony Todd.
I can actually live with the live-action movies, but Lion King is the one live-action movie that I don’t like, Mulan is a close second because it’s bad but at least it’s not boring.
In today’s society... We need Jay Shermans in the world more than ever... Now a lot of garbage films are being put out in a rapid rate... In the words of Jay Sherman: IT STINKS!
With a time machine, we'll wipe them out from existence and replace them with better films. The better films will be hailed with solid gold stories, performances, directions, cinematographies, dialogues, music, songs, and everything which makes a high quality film the best of the best.
He'd just be falsely accused of trying rape some bourgeois woman and his life would be slandered to his grave and his wikipedia page would ensure that future generations believe lies about him.
No it wasn't. It was just honest. Honesty in media is considered the greatest sin of our time. If a news reporter was 100% honest about a controversy or event, you could legally murder the man and the police would kiss the soles of your shoes.
An optimistic statment is immediately shown on here: On the short term, not viewing bad movies WILL end bad movies, but it will only last until what would be considered good now is considered bad, even horrible in the future. Like the concept of universal entropy, relative quality of movies old and new can go from good to bad overtime until there's a sharp line between what's good and what's bad with areas of neutrality.
This show was made in the 90s, Hollywood was always like this. In fact, there are a few advantages of 2010s Hollywood, while they are even more out of ideas, doing only reboots, remakes and sequels, and making even more superhero movies, at least nowadays, you can't sell a bad movie with a hundred million dollars of stunts and explosives, special effects don't sell a bad movie anymore. Say what you want about this excess of superhero movies, people are watching them because of the characters, not the special effects.
"This morning on English for Cab Drivers, I was going to teach you how to say 'He was already dead when I hit him'." The student reaction says it all. Now let's hope that self-driving cars don't get programmed to say that.
That's sad to see leftovers from the past that are the same thing as the original when the original did it better! i didn't pay to see these lazy halfassed live action remakes of disney classics and will continue to do so. Eventually the returns to these remakes will diminish and once they bomb, it will send Disney the message and cancel future remakes. I support Walt Disney Studios animation and Pixar.
Junk remakes existed in the past too. The only difference was that modern remakes have to take into account ESG and disingenuous social grandstanding. Remember that the same people telling the world that not liking a film is akin to burning crosses are the same people who will, with a straight face, accuse any black man of raping white women if he has a chance of getting into the Whitehouse without kissing the shoes of the bourgeoisie. Remember what these same people said about Herman Cain and remember that none of them apologized.
It didn't predict anything, it was already like this in the 1990s, you just remember the good movies from the past. One thing that got better: You can't sell a bad movie with a hundred million dollars of stunts and explosions, CGI got widespread and is no longer impressing.
this show is so timeless, it really resonates with me as an unloved film critic with a severe disdain for modern cinema and passion for meaningful classic cinema
I mean, everything Jay says here is true, and is applicable to any media, namely, "it's very simple, if you stop consuming bad x, they'll stop making bad x."
@@JoeFanik Unfortunately the hatewatching seems to have giving it a view boost, apparently it has S2 in the works That said, Velma seems to game the idea "if it stinks just don't go" by asking "Wanna see how far we can fuck it up?"
Modern critics need to learn this one solid advice. Trying to spin it to take big bad corpos down a peg won't do you any favors. Just makes you look foolish.
I only just saw a couple of memes with this scene on discord, so I thought I might as well watch the full scene myself. This is way more relevant now than it was back then, even though the '90s also had its fair share of bad movies.
This is what people should learn from "The Emoji Moive", and US/UM, and Ren Seeks Help, and Adam Sandler Movies and anything people know they won't like.
This includes hate watching things. It doesn't matter if you streamed that show you knew was gonna be bad with all the vitriol your heart can hold, all they see is another viewer.
A remake is only good if the director makes the film entirely their own while still having the basic framework of the original story. It's why the shot for shot Psycho remake doesn't work.
"If the movie is a phase 5 MCU not directed by James Gunn, just don't go. After the second use of a coloned subtitle? Give it a rest. If it's a remake of a classic? Stream the classic!"
Perfectly describes how most movies today are either shitty remakes, pointless sequels or regurgitated spin off crap. Call me old fashioned but i still prefer movies that are original and have talented actors/writers that make the story convincing and interesting
Disney, Netflix, and all these other streaming survives trying to revive the corpses of IPs that should just stay dead and untouched because they can't just leave something along now without altering scenes to make it less offensive.
remember the episode of had Jay Sherman who wrote a great script and was hired by Hollywood by a studio to write Ghostchasers 3 (Ghostbusters in the Critic universe) and when Jay wrote the script the executive of the studio told Jay his thoughts on his screenplay. the GB remake bombed because it was poorly paced and had a horrendous unfunny screenplay that felt it was written in a day on a notepad and to quote that Grossman guy from The Critic (remember that great adult animated show from the 90s?) from the LA Jay episode on what i think of the script to Ghostbusters 2016 on that episode when Jay Sherman wrote the script to Ghostchasers 3. Jay: All right, it's just you and me. Now what did you think of my script? Gary Grossman: It was excrement. Jay: Did you say it was excellent? Gary Grossman: It was crummy. Jay: Did you say "it was yummy? Gary Grossman: It was an awful piece of junk that made me want to puke all night. Jay: Did you say it was an awesome piece of spunk that you want to shoot tonight? Gary Grossman: It was a bilious piece of dirt that made me cry out in pain. Jay: Did you say it was a brilliant piece of work, and you'll fly me to Spain? Where we'll meet King Juan Carlos and drink sangria all night? Gary Grossman: You piece of blech. That episode predicted GB 2016 years later and it's screenplay which any rational true movielover/fan of the originals who know good filmmaking think of the remake's poorly written script.
Well, to be honest, it provoked people anyway. Seriously, this year is cancerous somehow. Almost everyone has high blood pressure at this point. No Man's Sky controversies, AVGN's ass getting chewed, someone threw a bottle of piss at me while I was getting out of a cab, TF2, it's seriously an awful year to be a human.
I really wanted to give that a go but after seeing the trailer admit it's a remake while also referencing the original with that "20 years ago line" I noped out. And then the deal was sealed when it was confirmed they brought the surviving ghostbusters in for unrelated cameos.
You know, I'm just going to refer people to this video every time someone complains about transformers or junk like the emoji movie from now on. If you go to a movie knowing it's bad, it's your fault, and there can be no remorse for you.
Кино
"If it's a re-make of a classic, RENT THE CLASSIC."
I'm looking at you, Disney!
I couldn't agree more.
It's really more on the viewers than anything else.
They did it to retain the copy rights. Why else would they do a carbon copy of a movie but in "live action"?
Eventually, Disney will make animated remakes of their live remakes.
And netflix!
Sweet holy Jesus, this has aged like the finest wine in the world.
"But I'll reach more people by reading it on this low-rated cable TV show."
It's more true today than it was at the time.
"if it's a remake of a classic - rent the classic!"
**The entire cowboy Bebop fandom cheers**
Exactly what I'm going to do instead of watching Amazon's WOKE of the Rings.
The Trigun fandom will be right along side Cowboy Bebop soon!
Never heard of that.
@@michaelwong6050 Define woke
Talking about movies, not anime you dumb weeb
The "Uh oh. The jig is up" part cracks me up every time!
This, and Duckman's rant on comedy are so relevant now. The 1990s animated sitcoms were really ahead of their time.
Now everything is a wannabe family guy clone seem like 😔
@@idriveastationwagon1534 In a Post-Bojack Horseman World
Was The Critic and Duckman actually ahead of their time or were they dealing with the same crapola current American culture is dealing with? I'd say instead of pretending that the animators of 90s late night cartoon shows were having clairvoyant visions of the future, it makes far more sense to admit that nothing ever truly changes. Jean Baptiste was spot on when he made the quote, "The more things change the more they stay the same."
@@nunisthathigh4825 Back then it wasn't anywhere near the level of clown that it has reached now . Lots of previous media called it straight.
@@TubeOfLaughes especially Beavis and Butthead with Mike Judges call on society and elitism.
If the movie used to be a TV Show, just don't go. = *Jem & the Holograms*
After Roman Numeral II, give it a rest. = *Ice Age*
If it's a re-make of a classic, RENT THE CLASSIC. = *Beauty and the Beast*
Tell them you want stories about people, not $100,000,000 of stunts and explosives. = *many Michael Bay directed films*
IF THE MOVIE STINKS, JUST DON'T GO. = *The Emoji Movie*
This comment should be on the top of the comments.
Lol 0:50 the jig is up
I guess if they ever make a Critic movie, just don't go
You gotta add the Sonic the hedgehog movie now.
I mean, Ice Age 3 wasn’t THAT bad!
There should be a video game version of this with the AVGN...
AVGN: "It's very simple if you stop buying shitty fucking games, they'll stop making shitty fucking games."
Bobby Kotick: "Uh-oh! The jig is up!" *jumps out window*
For those of you who don't know, Bobby Kotnick is the CEO of Activision.
+TheY2AProblem It's funny reading this now, given how James has stated he won't be watching the new Ghostbusters movie because he's pretty sure it will stink.
+liberty dude Jay Sherman says in this video, "if it's a remake of a classic, rent the classic."
+TheY2AProblem You watched the future!
Called it!
This certainly applies perfectly to Disney's unnecessary Live-Action remakes.
And the latest Star Wars content
Why you advertise them?
“If it’s a remake of a classic, tent the classic.”
My response to Disney’s “live action” remakes. The Lion King was a great animated film, why do we need a CGI remake?
I agree! the original was lightning in a bottle, you can't strike lightning twice.
*rent*
Amen! When I found out that Disney was remaking the lion king back in 2019, I wasn't impressed whatsoever. 😐 the original is a timeless classic.
@@thechuckjosechannel.2702 Give me a break, I've seen better animated timeless classics in Japan like Dragon Ball than that stupid furry cat movie, Heck even the Disney Afternoon was way more entertaining classics for me than the stupid classic Disney movies themselves.
@@kinnikuman-devilman_fan_2002 I see your point. With the way Disney seems to be treating Marvel and Star Wars these days, I prefer Anime!
God, I loved The Critic. He was 100% accurate about the state of movies today ... and ... back then.
Terminator 6 and Charlie's Angels bombed big time and people do have standards
It shows how these claims that "movies nowadays suck, movies in my time were better" are total bullshit, Hollywood was always like this, it's just that nostalgia makes us only remember the good stuff.
Plus, one thing got better, at least nowadays, special effects and CGI can't sell a bad movie anymore, say watch you want about all of those reboots and superhero movies, people are watching them because of the characters, not the special effects.
"There's something on English for Cab Drivers I think you all should see" LOL
How incredibly relevant now.
+Autistic Torchic
*current year
It's always been like this. Hollywood has basically always been creatively bankrupt. We only remember the good stuff.
Good thing Terminator Genysis and Ghostbusters reboot underperformed
Now and forever.
Autistic Torchic I'm from the future. This clip is STILL RELEVANT.
This aged like fine wine
I've considered making a video essay about this masterpiece of a show
"If it's a remake of a classic, rent the classic".
My thoughts on the Lion King remake
I agree! i have to see and pay to see these half assed liveaction soulless moneygrab remakes of Disney classics and will continue to do so and stick to the classics.
Eventually the returns on these remakes will diminish and should send Disney the message and can cancel future remakes and do different projects just like Zootopia and all
yes lol aged well, Mulan and though not disney, Robocop.
Only video games remakes are goodn
Sometimes the remakes are better than the classic. I prefer the 1990s version of Night of the Living Dead to the original. The female protagonist becomes more active, an how can you beat Tony Todd.
I can actually live with the live-action movies, but Lion King is the one live-action movie that I don’t like, Mulan is a close second because it’s bad but at least it’s not boring.
James Rolfe on the new Ghostbusters.
Let's take a moment to observe that Jay did this essay for so long he got five o'clock shadow.
I love how his disheveled look at the end and him falling over the podium is an awesome reference to the ending of Mr Smith Goes to Washington.
In today’s society... We need Jay Shermans in the world more than ever... Now a lot of garbage films are being put out in a rapid rate... In the words of Jay Sherman:
IT STINKS!
With a time machine, we'll wipe them out from existence and replace them with better films. The better films will be hailed with solid gold stories, performances, directions, cinematographies, dialogues, music, songs, and everything which makes a high quality film the best of the best.
Considering how YMS is doing right now, I think we need to reconsider if we need more Jay Shermans
He'd just be falsely accused of trying rape some bourgeois woman and his life would be slandered to his grave and his wikipedia page would ensure that future generations believe lies about him.
At long last a way to defeat Michael Bay
What about James Cameron?
Second verse same as first
+silvercheetah92
That; and, Zack Snyder.
Or, M.Night Shyamalan, if he screws up (again). Hopefully, not during/or after “Glass” premieres, next year.
What about James Cameron?
It work for Solo
Jay Sherman was the hero we need in the current times of Disney owning and ruining everything.
My thoughts exactly. Disney keeps ruining everything we love.
"If it's a remake of a classic, rent the classic."
Well I sometimes check out the original before I go see the remake/reboot.
On principal, if it's being remade, it was probably already good in the first place. I'd suggest watching the originals more often.
yeah that's probably the only point I don't agree with here, sometimes old movies are just too dated to be enjoyed by today's standards.
@@Muteki_REN watch the original still , regardless of which one you think is better , you need to have the bigger picture
@@nicoterron3729 well yeah I'd still watch both but remakes aren't always garbage, y'know?
@@Muteki_REN yes they are
James Rolfe gets this!
It's 2023, and this STILL resonates.
The Critic was truly ahead of its time.
ABC did this show so dirty.
No it wasn't. It was just honest. Honesty in media is considered the greatest sin of our time. If a news reporter was 100% honest about a controversy or event, you could legally murder the man and the police would kiss the soles of your shoes.
So did Fox (of course)
An optimistic statment is immediately shown on here: On the short term, not viewing bad movies WILL end bad movies, but it will only last until what would be considered good now is considered bad, even horrible in the future. Like the concept of universal entropy, relative quality of movies old and new can go from good to bad overtime until there's a sharp line between what's good and what's bad with areas of neutrality.
I disagree. Some art is timeless. You can't put an expiration date on the beauty of a sunset.
History is repeating itself over and over so often I can't tell how old I am anymore.
This is more relevant than ever now.
Speaks to that Ghostbusters remake flop
pytko3 And that's how find good satire
No, it's more revelant than ever Now
The only problem is people still go see bad movies,and then praise said bad movies"avenger endgame"
This show was made in the 90s, Hollywood was always like this.
In fact, there are a few advantages of 2010s Hollywood, while they are even more out of ideas, doing only reboots, remakes and sequels, and making even more superhero movies, at least nowadays, you can't sell a bad movie with a hundred million dollars of stunts and explosives, special effects don't sell a bad movie anymore.
Say what you want about this excess of superhero movies, people are watching them because of the characters, not the special effects.
This what James Rolfe meant about the Ghostbusters reboot.
And it worked lmao
It was a whelming movie
This is way ahead of its time! A fictional character spoke the truth about the importance of film.
If the movie stinks, just don’t go. You found it brother. Welcome.
PPG 2016, the new Ghostbusters movie, the upcoming emoji movie and overly long-runners deserve this treatment. Don't let incompetence win.
+Dr. Ivo N1000sh And Angry Birds.
+Timmy Thissen as if anyone was going to see that anyway
+Dr. Ivo N1000sh They are seriously making a movie about emojis?
+Mi Ga www.imdb.com/title/tt4877122/
Dr. Ivo N1000sh Oh, good golly me. How can they find *any* plot from those? Digestion has more potential for a story and a movie.
If I owned a theatre I'd play this before every screening.
"This morning on English for Cab Drivers, I was going to teach you how to say 'He was already dead when I hit him'."
The student reaction says it all. Now let's hope that self-driving cars don't get programmed to say that.
This show was ahead of its time, I swear to God.
"After Roman numeral 2, give it a rest!"
My reaction to The Matrix: Resurrections.
I say this every single time my wife complains about the most recent Marvel movie.
Once more this timeless show proves it's absolute relevance with the Release of the Emoji movie.
May god help us all.
'Water discovered in the Hudson River' that made my night!
Now if only RUclips critics could find this
Figures it would be the Lion King remake hitting $531M that introduces me to this video.
That's sad to see leftovers from the past that are the same thing as the original when the original did it better! i didn't pay to see these lazy halfassed live action remakes of disney classics and will continue to do so.
Eventually the returns to these remakes will diminish and once they bomb, it will send Disney the message and cancel future remakes. I support Walt Disney Studios animation and Pixar.
Someone needs to show this to the Critical Drinker and Quater(pounder)ing
also Filmento and Az from heelvsbabyface
Fits The Emoji Movie a whole lot more now than ever before.
More relevant now than it was back then
FoxHound785 oh no i'm there were plenty of awful movies back then. it's just the fact no one remembers them today.
Junk remakes existed in the past too. The only difference was that modern remakes have to take into account ESG and disingenuous social grandstanding. Remember that the same people telling the world that not liking a film is akin to burning crosses are the same people who will, with a straight face, accuse any black man of raping white women if he has a chance of getting into the Whitehouse without kissing the shoes of the bourgeoisie. Remember what these same people said about Herman Cain and remember that none of them apologized.
This predicted the sad state of Hollywood today
He left out the Negrification, otherwise yes.
It didn't predict anything, it was already like this in the 1990s, you just remember the good movies from the past.
One thing that got better: You can't sell a bad movie with a hundred million dollars of stunts and explosions, CGI got widespread and is no longer impressing.
@@jasonbourne4670 yes
@@silverdamascus2023 at least those movies weren't woke
Jay was ahead of the time.
This is extremely relevant right now!
Damn the relevance right now, impressive jay
this show is so timeless, it really resonates with me as an unloved film critic with a severe disdain for modern cinema and passion for meaningful classic cinema
People's response to Disney in 2023:
Incorrect. He's talking to the people's response to Disney in 2023 because that's who most needs to hear it.
It's kinda working. Wish was messy and people didn't go.
You know, nothing is stopping you or anyone else from emailing this video's URL to Disney.
That newspaper headline.
PAUSE THE VIDEO AND SEE
***** I'm dying of laughter!
Water Discovered in the Hudson River
I mean, everything Jay says here is true, and is applicable to any media, namely, "it's very simple, if you stop consuming bad x, they'll stop making bad x."
'After Roman numeral II, give it a rest!'
Bloody _Ice Age._
EDIT: R.I.P. Blue Sky Studios.
Relevant once again thanks to the new Velma show.
I haven't given it a chance and I'm glad I haven't. With a rating of 1.6/10, I hope the creators will finally get the idea
@@JoeFanik Unfortunately the hatewatching seems to have giving it a view boost, apparently it has S2 in the works
That said, Velma seems to game the idea "if it stinks just don't go" by asking "Wanna see how far we can fuck it up?"
Modern critics need to learn this one solid advice. Trying to spin it to take big bad corpos down a peg won't do you any favors. Just makes you look foolish.
So who came here after their first and only ever viewing of Star Wars The Last Jedi?
Last Jedi sucks ass!
SNC2319 ‘twas his point!
I was just told this idea was new and a unique way of thinking. That's how hard we have fallen as a civilization.
I only just saw a couple of memes with this scene on discord, so I thought I might as well watch the full scene myself. This is way more relevant now than it was back then, even though the '90s also had its fair share of bad movies.
This is what people should learn from "The Emoji Moive", and US/UM, and Ren Seeks Help, and Adam Sandler Movies and anything people know they won't like.
Ultra sun and ultra moon are good wtf
Better then the original s/m
Unless your talking about something else
This is literally the Emoji Movie in a nutshell.
(to the tune of the Ghostbusters theme)
“If something’s lame, and it ain’t that good, whatcha gonna do? Don’t watch it!”
- Honest Trailers
Here's what John Waters says: "You should remake the bad ones, not the good ones."
Some bad movies deserve a remake since they had a good concept that could give us a better movie if they done correctly.
@@silverdamascus2023 Precisely. This should be one of the good trends of entertainment.
So who else came here after the Cinemassacre and Ghostbusters movie incident?
I think the connection is just that James said he wouldn't go because he thought the movie would stink.
I came here after the Emoji Movie
Jay Sherman appeared in every episode of The Critic and every webisode of The Critic.
He predicted the fucking future! OMG
Nope, the 1990s was already like this, it's just that nostalgia makes us only remember the good movies from back then.
"If you stop *going* to bad movies, they'll stop *making* bad movies."
Unfortunately, that's just not true anymore. Thanks China!
This applies to the chinese as well.
You could never defeat the movie industry with just you following that advice.
Then translate this into chinese and tell them that.
"If the movie stinks, dosey doe."
0:50 Literally,Illumination.
I was just reminded of this. It's almost 30 years later. We learned Nothing.
I miss this short lived cartoon. Please never do a remake
A live action adaptation
1:00 what we should do with the Little Mermaid
This is also for shows like teen titans go. If the show stinks don't watch it. If you stop watching bad tv shows then they stop making bad tv shows.
This includes hate watching things. It doesn't matter if you streamed that show you knew was gonna be bad with all the vitriol your heart can hold, all they see is another viewer.
"If it's a remake of the classic, rent the classic"
While I agree... Scarface and The Fly joined the chat
The Fly and Blob were improvements on the originals
@@Johnlindsey289Thing (1982) WAS BETTER remake of 1950s!movie
A remake is only good if the director makes the film entirely their own while still having the basic framework of the original story. It's why the shot for shot Psycho remake doesn't work.
We need The Critic now more than ever!
I agreed you you Jay Sherman
"If the movie is a phase 5 MCU not directed by James Gunn, just don't go. After the second use of a coloned subtitle? Give it a rest. If it's a remake of a classic? Stream the classic!"
This show needs to come back.
0:45 Paul Feig and Amy Pascal.
Perfectly describes how most movies today are either shitty remakes, pointless sequels or regurgitated spin off crap. Call me old fashioned but i still prefer movies that are original and have talented actors/writers that make the story convincing and interesting
So don't even bother with the new stuff. Take the road he lay out.
I think we know why we're here again... DISNEY!!!!
Disney, Netflix, and all these other streaming survives trying to revive the corpses of IPs that should just stay dead and untouched because they can't just leave something along now without altering scenes to make it less offensive.
Ironically, Disney partially owns this.
Little mermaid remake brought me here!
Why, to relearn the lesson you failed at?
*Water Discovered In Hudson River*
How did I miss that the first time?! That comment aged like wine! 🤣
Basically my response to people complaining about remakes. They act like they can't watch the original movies anymore.
There can be good remakes and poor halfassed cashgrab remakes
Agree 100% with him, if the movie stinks just don't go.
Amazing how this phrase can still be used today.
Ghostbusters
remember the episode of had Jay Sherman who wrote a great script and was hired by Hollywood by a studio to write Ghostchasers 3 (Ghostbusters in the Critic universe) and when Jay wrote the script the executive of the studio told Jay his thoughts on his screenplay.
the GB remake bombed because it was poorly paced and had a horrendous unfunny screenplay that felt it was written in a day on a notepad and to quote that Grossman guy from The Critic (remember that great adult animated show from the 90s?) from the LA Jay episode on what i think of the script to Ghostbusters 2016 on that episode when Jay Sherman wrote the script to Ghostchasers 3.
Jay: All right, it's just you and me. Now what did you think of my script?
Gary Grossman: It was excrement.
Jay: Did you say it was excellent?
Gary Grossman: It was crummy.
Jay: Did you say "it was yummy?
Gary Grossman: It was an awful piece of junk that made me want to puke all night.
Jay: Did you say it was an awesome piece of spunk that you want to shoot tonight?
Gary Grossman: It was a bilious piece of dirt that made me cry out in pain.
Jay: Did you say it was a brilliant piece of work, and you'll fly me to Spain? Where we'll meet King Juan Carlos and drink sangria all night?
Gary Grossman: You piece of blech.
That episode predicted GB 2016 years later and it's screenplay which any rational true movielover/fan of the originals who know good filmmaking think of the remake's poorly written script.
The Emoji Movie
This is a perfect explanation for everything in the movie and tv industry in this year 2016
0:50 Uh oh. The jig is up.
Ghostbusters 2016. Thank you Jay!
Someone spam this on Patton Oswalt's twitter.
What did he do?
He gave AVGN shit because AVGN made a calm and un-provoking video about how he isn't planning on seeing/reviewing the new Ghost busters movie.
+Mloclam Nomdnih If the movie stinks, JUST DON'T GO
Well, to be honest, it provoked people anyway. Seriously, this year is cancerous somehow. Almost everyone has high blood pressure at this point.
No Man's Sky controversies, AVGN's ass getting chewed, someone threw a bottle of piss at me while I was getting out of a cab, TF2, it's seriously an awful year to be a human.
John Dough 2020: *hold my viruses and riots*
2020 still relevant
Hollywood was always like this since the 1990s, nostalgia makes us only remember the good movies from back then.
If the movie Stinks, dosey doe. Lol
Anyone watch Ghostbusters 2016?
I didnt.
I watched ghost busters 1 and 2.
I really wanted to give that a go but after seeing the trailer admit it's a remake while also referencing the original with that "20 years ago line" I noped out. And then the deal was sealed when it was confirmed they brought the surviving ghostbusters in for unrelated cameos.
You know, I'm just going to refer people to this video every time someone complains about transformers or junk like the emoji movie from now on.
If you go to a movie knowing it's bad, it's your fault, and there can be no remorse for you.
Speaking of the new Ghostbusters remake
"... and nothing of value was lost!"
Sometimes some things need to be left alone
"Tell them you want a story about people, not 100 million dollars of stunts and explosions."
Im just looking at you, Michael Bay, no reason.
My way: If Foodfight stinks, just don't go!
They tried to warn us...
They did everything on their power to warn us...
it's sad that one this didn't get another chance two duke's voice actor is dead and three the show is still relevant :)