Efficiency. It is all about efficiency of power generation versus cost. And it, nuclear power, after the huge Capital cost of set up, is very efficient in fuel and operation. And lasts for a long time, with maintenance, and provides baseload power. Tell that to the Green Dreamers who think that we can get power for free from the sun&wind ! Everything costs, including all the coal we have burnt, worldwide; the cost being the warming environment ! OR.... the alternative, reduce and stop increasing populations of humans ! Less people on planet; less pollution.
Coal is small pollution problem in the scheme of things mate , and people a quick to forget that the high standard of living and cheap energy we had for many decades until recent decades were supplied by coal and gas and fossil fuels, they supplied masses of heavy industry around the world and in our country for many decades , currently and in the recent couple of decades we have seen the de industrialisation of the west and particularly in Australia , every year we have closed down more of the old fossil plants and generators , and look at the country now , its is a disaster with massive cost of living , masses of debt , the third worst highest debt by the citizens in the developed world . And these renewables which are allegedly green are hugely costly to implement, and apart from them needing thousands of kilometres of extra power lines, they need to have masses of land cleared and roads made to access them for installation and maintenance , yet they are part time power , and mere point that all this land needs to be ravaged for bird killing wind turbines in the first place surely goes against the green mantra ! Add to that these things require many rechargeable massive battery installations that are hugely expensive and just like the wind turbines have a relatively short service life compared to nuclear and fossil generators . When you delve into the detail renewables do not stack up for a country’s power system . This rhetoric by the the government that sun and wind is free is quite laughable, yet it might be free , but capturing it turning into electricity , storing it and then distributing around a giant country it is hugely expensive. It’s really not rocket science. The CSIRO spokesman admitted their modelling was not complete and they did not want to put their modelling in public because it may different to the government’s 😂😂😂😂😂 . Basically they have been toeing the line for Mr Albanese and Mr Bowen who are excellent at making statements without telling you the pertinent details that actually matter. Make no mistake we are being conned.
@mikldude9376 Never let facts get in the way of a good climate change hysteria! 7 many idiots are easily fooled and will continue to buy into "we need to transition to renewables to save the planet " cult and keep left wing socialist Labor governments in power in order to be "saved".
Well said Barnaby. The Australian people have been massively hoodwinked by corrupt government in the pockets of huge business interests. The power bill does indeed tell the truth.
Everyone should understand that when Chris Bowen makes multimillion dollar commitments on Renewables, it's not his money he's committing..........it's yours !
Also don't forget that all that money and more needs to be spent every 20 years or so. Solar and wind generation is in continual need of replacement. That's the hidden reason why these are called 'renewable' energy sources. It is not a single one of spend, it's perpetual.
@ yep. Sell it to China to burn in their coal plants, with at least one a week being built, to produce goods we then transport back using oil for consuming pleasure. But hey, let’s shit down our 20 remaining plants to virtue signal to gullible fools for their vote.
Wind turbine...solar panels....where are they going to be buried??? Will they be environmental friendly in the ground? Albo and Bowen never discuss this problem
Nah we will pay again big time to have it dumped in some African/Asian country. Maybe assist with those shrinking islands in the pacific you know the ones actually growing from coral reproducing and growing extra fast due to them waters being warm, but dump tons of wind and solar factories as artificial reefs.
2050 net zero is dangerous for all Australians. Our standard of living is already plummeting net zero is just amplifying our woes driving jobs overseas and so on. For the pain and suffering net zero is already causing we are making no difference what so ever for our deprivations.
Net Zero is prohibitively costly, impractical and totally unnecessary. It is economically destructive delusional insanity. The result of ridiculous popular delusions triumphing over critical thinking and common sense due to weak and corrupt politicians. We need to urgently abandon this nonsense before further damage is done to our country.
@@deanguthrie1395 Morrison had it right. To use a swimming analogy: The (renewables) race is won not by the first person off the blocks, but rather by the last person off the blocks. Let's everyone burn their GDP on this expensive technology and we can come in last when it's cheaper.
Just travelled down the entire east coast of New Zealand on both islands and didn’t see a single wind farm. And Australians call them backward. I’m fed up of seeing them everywhere in my home state☹️
They have hydro at least sth island anyway (I’m not a fan of wind or solar farms here either - don’t even scratch the surface of the NSW Rez zone funding - basically “gifts” to subsidise developers via infrastructure and freight upgrades etc)
Harapaki Wind Farm, 35km northwest of Napier, NZ reached its designed capacity of 41 turbines, 176MW (70K home) capacity in July, 2024. Kaiwera Wind Farm near Gore, Southland , NZ, started construction on stage 2 in July, 2024 with the design adding to stage one to have (stage 1 plus stage 2 to be) 46 wind turbines on site for a 198MW (79K home) capacity when operational.
The correct policy is to withdraw from the ridiculous Paris Accord and simply use the most economical energy resources available. Nuclear power plants should be legal in this country, however, new coal fired power plants should be built if these are cheaper.
Keith is one of the good ones he knows what he’s talking about, it really saddens me telling the truth and no one listening, it’s just that simple, Thank Keith for the truth
Same in Hungary. The country's baseload power is supplied by our single nuclear facility. Geographically we don't have much choice. Thankfully, the new reactor project didn't get cancelled either. The push for solar madness is calming down as it's starting to affect daytime grid management.
@@peterking8564 The facts are: renewables are not recyclable and have a 20 to 30 year lifespan, if that. They need some form of storage to work at night. Batteries or dams. Both have environmental consequences. His arguments are valid and you should address the message, not the man.
You only have to look at what happened to the solar panel farm in Texas. One big hailstorm then goodbye solar panels and goodbye water table due to the toxic chemicals there made from .
The Nationals need to be much more vocal about ‘a far go’ National policies supporting Australian standards of morals and expectations of community behaviour and also involvement and control of immigration, electricity and diesel prices, cost of living, pensioners and healthcare.
And then once they are trash we have to pay to dispose of them and then pay for the new ones, it is a huge waste of time and money. Why don’t we commit to Net Zero when China and India do, if this is really an environmental catastrophe( which I very much doubt) then everyone has to do it or you are wasting your time.
They can be built to withstand hurricanes in US, and can be built to detect earthquakes and shut down. Cyclones in Australia wouldn't be a problem. I agree with using coal.👍
Funny, I was just thinking about it this evening and was like daamn, they making lots of money by selling these useless panels and destroying meadows. Then here s what I see. 😹
There is very little silver in solar panels these days. They actually screen print it on. Trying to retrieve the silver and other 'valuable' materials from a solar panel costs more than it did to make it in the first place. Which is why few of them are fully recycled.
Furthermore people are underestimating the value of the EV future. Tesla. Target: 2.4 million deliveries Let's do the maths: Tesla plans to deliver 515,000 vehicles in the fourth quarter of 2024. That means it will theoretically end the year at 1,850,000 cars. So, in 2025, it should reach volumes around 2.2-2.4 million cars.4 Nov 2024 Here are Tesla's vehicle production numbers by year: • 2023: Tesla produced nearly 1.85 million vehicles, a 35% increase from 2022. • 2022: Tesla produced 1,369,611 vehicles. • 2021: Tesla produced 930,422 vehicles. • 2020: Tesla produced 509,737 vehicles. • 2019: Tesla produced 365,232 vehicles. • 2018: Tesla produced 254,530 vehicles.
Why Three choices: A- coal, B - Nuclear, C - ‘renewables. So why present B only in this interview? You say A the whole time! There is still A or B, A AND!! B, F C!
That's short term and it's mostly organic, Soylent Green/Bugs hybrid is the long term for us when there's no food to eat as cows will be banned, growing crops will be impossible due to solar power factories and diesel being outlawed for EV tractors that run 4hrs a day. Wind factories are concrete, steel and fiber glass with resin; in some places they're burning blades but the glass and resin is left behind and that then goes into landfill. Solar panels have the metal removed and the rest - glass. silicon cells and resin are buried.
What gets me is that the current carbon dioxide, which contains carbon, is sequestrated by mother nature, resulting in a (currently) 20% increase in global greening. More produce, more mouths fed! We can safely progress with coal until nuclear is set up...
Almost all of Australia's renewable infrastructure was built during the coalition's time in office in other words when Barnaby Joyce was a minister and deputy prime minister. He was happy to let it happen then?
Because during the LNPs time in office the left of politics controlled the Senate, and so it was impossible for the LNP to implement any sensible outcomes. Even the Kurri Kurri gas plant was a s fight to get built.
Also people are underestimating the value of the EV future. President of the USA supporter, Elon Musk's Tesla's worth $1.32 TRILLIONS. Tesla is now worth more than GM, Ford, Toyota, and other car companies - combined. Tesla (TSLA) stock has been on a tear lately, reaching a $1 trillion market capitalization. The company is now bigger than a solid chunk of other major auto companies - combined.13 Nov 2024 Since the election, Tesla has added close to $250 billion to its value, pushing its market cap to over $1 trillion for the first time since 2022. Tesla is now worth more than Toyota, Ferrari, General Motors, Porsche, and Ford combined.14 Nov 2024 Elon Musk owns Twitter. And can talk to the world. China EV production is in the millions.
they want to buy the small reactors the one don't produce too much waste at all will they hardy make nuclear waste the hospitals will produce more waste then them anything else you @Poorlineforeva are talking about the big large ones there what produce of large amounts of waist and storage but no Australia is talking about the very small ones the ones what Japan said about after their large ones got destroyed by the tide wave's they was going to make the very small one's sizes of a small apartment what will never produce large amounts of the nuclear waste or none at all where the wastes ward off being smaller than hospital waste's but the environment active got involve before the plans went into a fart force the Japanese to fix their old ones up even Australia was going to buy them 👍😊👍
@@RealLuciferBlack Lol Common sense Capeboy 🧛.... 🌬️🌋🌊☀️ - Mother nature's free energy sustaining all life on earth for over 5 billion years....🌏 😆😆😆...try another account sweetie, this one's expired
Why not water turbines not under the water to a fan or by a tube but by digging a massive pit at the ocean low tide to waves little extra over flow out over the day during tidal rise that concrete pool fills to flow time water amounts metrics to fill it as it's flowing the area is to high low and amount required to turbine generator and the return to pressure and may require some electric pump out to hydro dip dug?????????? 24/7 full power systems???????
Tidal power has been very ineffectual the systems built produce little power and fall apart in years (from memory Scotland had one project canned recently), then you have to transmit the power back to some place useful. The most interesting one was Germany compressing air into deep underwater bladders/balloons and then extracting the energy later. Also some one in Western Australia had wave action on WA coast but think it got canned for environmental reasons. Gravity Batteries probably have the least environmental issues either some deep mine shaft with motor/generator to shift a large concrete block up and down in the shaft or a crane and stack tons of concrete blocks up and then release them when you need the power, again I think these are ineffectual in the grand scheme of things compared to a decent sized nuclear reactor!
Sky is really the only one actually sprouting Dutton's plan as even conservative print media outlets seem to be struggling to identify any provable benefits. Dutton just simply hasn't put the work in to make it easier to sell.
And just what conservative print media are you referring to? The only one that fits that description is The Australian, same owners as Skynews, both very supportive of the LNP energy policy.
By 2030 most miles will be electric. Solar today is the cheapest source of energy on the planet. Solar PV price has gone down by 80 percent in the last 10 years. Solar PVs will keep dropping in price. Batteries keep dropping in price. The electric cars are cheaper to maintain and cleaner than ice vehicles. It costs $11 to charge an electric car versus $90 for a petrol car for 500 kms. This transition is going ahead in the future as the markets, car industry and investors like Tesla have clean energy goals. Oil and gas will be obsolete by 2030. Australia has a solar advantage. Nuclear is a doom day plan for Australia as it will be an expensive option, nuclear makes sense only in cold frozen areas like Russia. Furthermore a nuclear disaster due to bushfires will destroy alot of lives. Its time to think wisely as nuclear is NOT the best option. For further information listen to Tony Seba.
Paris accord is not a legally binding document at all. The Paris Agreement in fact relies on a fluid agreement with no definitions in International Law The treaty has no legal teeth. It does not impose penalties, such as fees or embargos, for parties that violate its terms, and no International court or governing body is ready to enforce compliance. With Nations wakening to the economic damage being done by the Paris Agreement will never act fast enough to mitigate and adapt to climate change, and developed countries will shirk their responsibility to fund climate action in developing states. New environmental norms are only given lip service, and the optics are manipulated. COP26 meeting suggests this will be the norm withmany Nations defying or withdrawing from the treaty entirely.
You madam are seriously delusional, renewables cannot cheaply or efficiently run a country, renewables are exactly what they say they are, life of ten years then we pay more to renew them, just laughable.
All temperatures are Fahrenheit. 12-19-2024, My city's official temperatures. High: 78° Low: 37° Arctic Bay, Nunavut, Canada High: -21° Low: -31° Wind chill. -52° Amundsen-Scott, South Pole Station High: -15° Low: -22° Wind chill. -39°
People are underestimating the value of the EV future. 247 EV v2g value with rooftop PV. Benefits are TAX-FREE SAVINGS on: No imported petroleum No expensive grid electricity No expensive gas heating, cooking, hotwater, No expansion of grid generation or grid capacity construction costs. Rooftop PV 3cents $kWh. TAX-FREE SAVINGS for higher marginal taxed people is the way to understand early adopters. As more 'not so early adopters', in greater numbers, follow the lead of the wealthy then the daily duck curve of demand collapse will be the deadcat in the middle of the road 247 no demand curve 247. SHTTSNPANTS is the feeling that the grid owners will get as 247 cashflow plummets. A $TRILLIONS grid asset and no cashflow, wow.
Please stop the ocean wind farms in port Stephens. Waste of money.
Waste of money everywhere and a blight on the environment
@@roz7441 How true! Pristine land becoming a bloody eyesore!
Just build a new coal power plant with new technology that's cleaner than our old ones
Efficiency. It is all about efficiency of power generation versus cost. And it, nuclear power, after the huge Capital cost of set up, is very efficient in fuel and operation. And lasts for a long time, with maintenance, and provides baseload power. Tell that to the Green Dreamers who think that we can get power for free from the sun&wind !
Everything costs, including all the coal we have burnt, worldwide; the cost being the warming environment !
OR.... the alternative, reduce and stop increasing populations of humans !
Less people on planet; less pollution.
Nice try but fossil fuels gotta go - you know that, I know that, everyone knows that in 2024.
Coal is small pollution problem in the scheme of things mate , and people a quick to forget that the high standard of living and cheap energy we had for many decades until recent decades were supplied by coal and gas and fossil fuels, they supplied masses of heavy industry around the world and in our country for many decades , currently and in the recent couple of decades we have seen the de industrialisation of the west and particularly in Australia , every year we have closed down more of the old fossil plants and generators , and look at the country now , its is a disaster with massive cost of living , masses of debt , the third worst highest debt by the citizens in the developed world . And these renewables which are allegedly green are hugely costly to implement, and apart from them needing thousands of kilometres of extra power lines, they need to have masses of land cleared and roads made to access them for installation and maintenance , yet they are part time power , and mere point that all this land needs to be ravaged for bird killing wind turbines in the first place surely goes against the green mantra !
Add to that these things require many rechargeable massive battery installations that are hugely expensive and just like the wind turbines have a relatively short service life compared to nuclear and fossil generators .
When you delve into the detail renewables do not stack up for a country’s power system .
This rhetoric by the the government that sun and wind is free is quite laughable, yet it might be free , but capturing it turning into electricity , storing it and then distributing around a giant country it is hugely expensive.
It’s really not rocket science.
The CSIRO spokesman admitted their modelling was not complete and they did not want to put their modelling in public because it may different to the government’s 😂😂😂😂😂 .
Basically they have been toeing the line for Mr Albanese and Mr Bowen who are excellent at making statements without telling you the pertinent details that actually matter.
Make no mistake we are being conned.
@@mikldude9376 I agree 100 percent i wish more people could see what you see I see it my friend's do
@mikldude9376 Never let facts get in the way of a good climate change hysteria! 7 many idiots are easily fooled and will continue to buy into "we need to transition to renewables to save the planet " cult and keep left wing socialist Labor governments in power in order to be "saved".
Well said Barnaby. The Australian people have been massively hoodwinked by corrupt government in the pockets of huge business interests. The power bill does indeed tell the truth.
Everyone should understand that when Chris Bowen makes multimillion dollar commitments on Renewables, it's not his money he's committing..........it's yours !
Oh i certainly do
Also don't forget that all that money and more needs to be spent every 20 years or so. Solar and wind generation is in continual need of replacement. That's the hidden reason why these are called 'renewable' energy sources. It is not a single one of spend, it's perpetual.
He is a dangerous lunatic who belongs in a psychiatric hospital.
Exactly! Bowen isn't just spending, he's WASTING OUR TAX MONEY.
Did you say multi-million?
Give us back our cheap and reliable coal. Australia needs to look after itself. Nothing we do will reduce global CO2 emissions, nor does it matter.
And that level of selfishness is why the future generations will suffer
We sell tones to be burnt on same planet but can't ourselves because the carbon 😂
@@X31F lol! Get a grip. Man made CO2 is not destroying the planet. It’s a narrative used to redistribute power. Wake up.
Government years ahead of dei hire they hire retards now
@ yep. Sell it to China to burn in their coal plants, with at least one a week being built, to produce goods we then transport back using oil for consuming pleasure. But hey, let’s shit down our 20 remaining plants to virtue signal to gullible fools for their vote.
Wind turbine...solar panels....where are they going to be buried??? Will they be environmental friendly in the ground? Albo and Bowen never discuss this problem
Nah we will pay again big time to have it dumped in some African/Asian country. Maybe assist with those shrinking islands in the pacific you know the ones actually growing from coral reproducing and growing extra fast due to them waters being warm, but dump tons of wind and solar factories as artificial reefs.
Bowen never discusses a lot of problems and he will never tell the truth about the real cost of renewables.
just make shoes out of them.
2050 net zero is dangerous for all Australians. Our standard of living is already plummeting net zero is just amplifying our woes driving jobs overseas and so on. For the pain and suffering net zero is already causing we are making no difference what so ever for our deprivations.
Its what the global elites want...Destroy the West to create a Global Government that is what it is all about!
Net Zero is prohibitively costly, impractical and totally unnecessary.
It is economically destructive delusional insanity. The result of ridiculous popular delusions triumphing over critical thinking and common sense due to weak and corrupt politicians.
We need to urgently abandon this nonsense before further damage is done to our country.
@@deanguthrie1395 Morrison had it right. To use a swimming analogy: The (renewables) race is won not by the first person off the blocks, but rather by the last person off the blocks. Let's everyone burn their GDP on this expensive technology and we can come in last when it's cheaper.
Just travelled down the entire east coast of New Zealand on both islands and didn’t see a single wind farm. And Australians call them backward. I’m fed up of seeing them everywhere in my home state☹️
Your standard is NZ?. Are you serious?
They have hydro at least sth island anyway (I’m not a fan of wind or solar farms here either - don’t even scratch the surface of the NSW Rez zone funding - basically “gifts” to subsidise developers via infrastructure and freight upgrades etc)
rub two sheep together and harvest all the static electricity.
There are wind farms in New Zealand. Just east of Palmerston North there are 55 huge wind turbines.
Harapaki Wind Farm, 35km northwest of Napier, NZ reached its designed capacity of 41 turbines, 176MW (70K home) capacity in July, 2024. Kaiwera Wind Farm near Gore, Southland , NZ, started construction on stage 2 in July, 2024 with the design adding to stage one to have (stage 1 plus stage 2 to be) 46 wind turbines on site for a 198MW (79K home) capacity when operational.
The correct policy is to withdraw from the ridiculous Paris Accord and simply use the most economical energy resources available.
Nuclear power plants should be legal in this country, however, new coal fired power plants should be built if these are cheaper.
Just google the world by renewables.
There are countries doing renewables then Australia.
Exactly!!!
Renewables are highly toxic and should never end up in land fill but regrettably it happens too often.
It's a stupid path.
Green energy will never meet base load power grow up
Keith is one of the good ones he knows what he’s talking about, it really saddens me telling the truth and no one listening, it’s just that simple, Thank Keith for the truth
Voters MUST elect REPRESENTATIVES of its people, not a Party, that has other adjendas.
Renewable energy Failure 🤣🤣
Ontario Canada has been running on nuclear for 50 years with no problems
15c per kwh too
Same in Hungary. The country's baseload power is supplied by our single nuclear facility. Geographically we don't have much choice. Thankfully, the new reactor project didn't get cancelled either. The push for solar madness is calming down as it's starting to affect daytime grid management.
Barnaby you nailed nicely, I totally agree with you
You have my vote
Covering the land with solar panels doesn’t make sense ?
Not looking at sence. It's the money that adds up
Google agrivoltics farming
@@terryquarton2523 another buzzword
Well said Barnaby.
Spot on.
Australia will have nuclear power stations one day. Why not start now....
Cars end up as landfill. So does household waste, and packaging. Coal leaves no landfill.
Keith Pitt will be a big loss to the Coalition
He knows what he is talking about
We need people like him
Barnaby Joyce makes sense again, no base load means no reliable power, fact
Barnably is focussed on creating fear doubt and anxiety and does not like facts. The guy is a spokesman for coal interests.
@@peterking8564 The facts are: renewables are not recyclable and have a 20 to 30 year lifespan, if that. They need some form of storage to work at night. Batteries or dams. Both have environmental consequences. His arguments are valid and you should address the message, not the man.
@@peterking8564 coal works.
50% of Australian people share the same mindset as Albosleazy.... that's where the problem lies .....
Exactly!!!!
A balanced energy strategy is essential for future growth. ⚡🤔
Nothing balanced about wind turbines, solar panels or backup batteries.
You only have to look at what happened to the solar panel farm in Texas. One big hailstorm then goodbye solar panels and goodbye water table due to the toxic chemicals there made from .
Load shedding is going to come. No doubt. South Africa 🇿🇦 same as them.
Watching Australia go down the “gurgler” with all this renewabull bs.
Good luck with that Australian’s. 🙄
Yes they are "RENEWABLE" this means every few years they need to be "RENEWED". So yes renewable and costly and a waste of our valued tax money
Barnaby Joyce your wrong. renew every 20 odd years. So that's where renewables come from
The Nationals need to be much more vocal about ‘a far go’ National policies supporting Australian standards of morals and expectations of community behaviour and also involvement and control of immigration, electricity and diesel prices, cost of living, pensioners and healthcare.
Coal Coal Coal. Cheapest and reliable. Upgrade the 🏭
enewable energy projects often face disposal challenges. ♻⚠ There is a need for better management of renewable resources. 🛠🌿
And then once they are trash we have to pay to dispose of them and then pay for the new ones, it is a huge waste of time and money.
Why don’t we commit to Net Zero when China and India do, if this is really an environmental catastrophe( which I very much doubt) then everyone has to do it or you are wasting your time.
SPOT ON.....
Are they going to close Lucas heights if they donot trust nuclear ???????????????????????????????????????????????//
Blackout Bowen will go there as soon as his lead radiation protection suit is made...
Yeah, but is a nuclear facility a good idea in a cyclone region? Just say the magic word: Coal fired!
They can be built to withstand hurricanes in US, and can be built to detect earthquakes and shut down.
Cyclones in Australia wouldn't be a problem.
I agree with using coal.👍
Funny, I was just thinking about it this evening and was like daamn, they making lots of money by selling these useless panels and destroying meadows. Then here s what I see. 😹
They are gooses
Lol and whos recycling the silver out of it for peanuts no one silver shortage coming
There is very little silver in solar panels these days. They actually screen print it on. Trying to retrieve the silver and other 'valuable' materials from a solar panel costs more than it did to make it in the first place. Which is why few of them are fully recycled.
Furthermore people are underestimating the value of the EV future. Tesla.
Target: 2.4 million deliveries
Let's do the maths: Tesla plans to deliver 515,000 vehicles in the fourth quarter of 2024. That means it will theoretically end the year at 1,850,000 cars. So, in 2025, it should reach volumes around 2.2-2.4 million cars.4 Nov 2024
Here are Tesla's vehicle production numbers by year:
• 2023: Tesla produced nearly 1.85 million vehicles, a 35% increase from 2022.
• 2022: Tesla produced 1,369,611 vehicles.
• 2021: Tesla produced 930,422 vehicles.
• 2020: Tesla produced 509,737 vehicles.
• 2019: Tesla produced 365,232 vehicles.
• 2018: Tesla produced 254,530 vehicles.
Why Three choices:
A- coal, B - Nuclear, C - ‘renewables.
So why present B only in this interview?
You say A the whole time!
There is still A or B, A AND!! B, F C!
People also end up as landfill, didn't anyone ever tell you?
That's short term and it's mostly organic, Soylent Green/Bugs hybrid is the long term for us when there's no food to eat as cows will be banned, growing crops will be impossible due to solar power factories and diesel being outlawed for EV tractors that run 4hrs a day. Wind factories are concrete, steel and fiber glass with resin; in some places they're burning blades but the glass and resin is left behind and that then goes into landfill. Solar panels have the metal removed and the rest - glass. silicon cells and resin are buried.
Dutton has nothing to offer, so he restarted the nuclear debate. Austerity and Robodebt do not create poverty ?
What gets me is that the current carbon dioxide, which contains carbon, is sequestrated by mother nature, resulting in a (currently) 20% increase in global greening. More produce, more mouths fed! We can safely progress with coal until nuclear is set up...
Almost all of Australia's renewable infrastructure was built during the coalition's time in office in other words when Barnaby Joyce was a minister and deputy prime minister. He was happy to let it happen then?
Because during the LNPs time in office the left of politics controlled the Senate, and so it was impossible for the LNP to implement any sensible outcomes. Even the Kurri Kurri gas plant was a s fight to get built.
A mix of energy sources is good. Putting all your eggs in one basket is not
Also people are underestimating the value of the EV future.
President of the USA supporter, Elon Musk's
Tesla's worth $1.32 TRILLIONS.
Tesla is now worth more than GM, Ford, Toyota, and other car companies - combined. Tesla (TSLA) stock has been on a tear lately, reaching a $1 trillion market capitalization. The company is now bigger than a solid chunk of other major auto companies - combined.13 Nov 2024
Since the election, Tesla has added close to $250 billion to its value, pushing its market cap to over $1 trillion for the first time since 2022. Tesla is now worth more than Toyota, Ferrari, General Motors, Porsche, and Ford combined.14 Nov 2024
Elon Musk owns Twitter. And can talk to the world.
China EV production is in the millions.
Nuclear waste doesn't
So why are renewables better, Shaun? You can't deflect forever 😉
they want to buy the small reactors the one don't produce too much waste at all will they hardy make nuclear waste the hospitals will produce more waste then them anything else you
@Poorlineforeva are talking about the big large ones there what produce of large amounts of waist and storage but no Australia is talking about the very small ones the ones what Japan said about after their large ones got destroyed by the tide wave's they was going to make the very small one's sizes of a small apartment what will never produce large amounts of the nuclear waste or none at all where the wastes ward off being smaller than hospital waste's but the environment active got involve before the plans went into a fart force the Japanese to fix their old ones up even Australia was going to buy them 👍😊👍
@@RealLuciferBlack
Lol
Common sense Capeboy 🧛....
🌬️🌋🌊☀️ - Mother nature's free energy sustaining all life on earth for over 5 billion years....🌏
😆😆😆...try another account sweetie, this one's expired
@@RealLuciferBlackbecause they don't leak radiation for a hundred thousand years.
@@RealLuciferBlackGas turbines are the way to go. Cheaper than nuke and no waste
Why not water turbines not under the water to a fan or by a tube but by digging a massive pit at the ocean low tide to waves little extra over flow out over the day during tidal rise that concrete pool fills to flow time water amounts metrics to fill it as it's flowing the area is to high low and amount required to turbine generator and the return to pressure and may require some electric pump out to hydro dip dug?????????? 24/7 full power systems???????
Tidal power has been very ineffectual the systems built produce little power and fall apart in years (from memory Scotland had one project canned recently), then you have to transmit the power back to some place useful. The most interesting one was Germany compressing air into deep underwater bladders/balloons and then extracting the energy later. Also some one in Western Australia had wave action on WA coast but think it got canned for environmental reasons. Gravity Batteries probably have the least environmental issues either some deep mine shaft with motor/generator to shift a large concrete block up and down in the shaft or a crane and stack tons of concrete blocks up and then release them when you need the power, again I think these are ineffectual in the grand scheme of things compared to a decent sized nuclear reactor!
Cheaper MWh now then 25 year average. Solar making you lies
Dude stop talking over top of him, is it your first day doing this?
Barnaby looks almost sober.
It's a trick of the light
@@PoorlineforevaBarnaby looks sober, but you and the other chap commentator aren't😂😂😂😂😂
Ladies, please. Go down to your local pub and ask all the bar rats there how they vote. I dare you 😉
Mate, go down to your local pub (if you can afford to) and ask the regular drunks there who they vote for. I dare you.
Watch your mouths.
Great Australian only third to Pauline and Jackie
Onya Barnaby!
Oil and gas projects end up as seaspill.
Sky is really the only one actually sprouting Dutton's plan as even conservative print media outlets seem to be struggling to identify any provable benefits. Dutton just simply hasn't put the work in to make it easier to sell.
And just what conservative print media are you referring to? The only one that fits that description is The Australian, same owners as Skynews, both very supportive of the LNP energy policy.
Sorry Sky but two and a half to three minutes of adds before a 7 minute video is in tolerable and i cant watch it.
don't you have a button that says skip?
Barnaby is a goose. The energy mix is just too complex for somebody like him to understand.
Barnaby needs a mindfill. He has net-zero between his ears.
You removed my comments, weak as .....
No wonder you drink barnaby.
By 2030 most miles will be electric. Solar today is the cheapest source of energy on the planet. Solar PV price has gone down by 80 percent in the last 10 years. Solar PVs will keep dropping in price. Batteries keep dropping in price. The electric cars are cheaper to maintain and cleaner than ice vehicles. It costs $11 to charge an electric car versus $90 for a petrol car for 500 kms. This transition is going ahead in the future as the markets, car industry and investors like Tesla have clean energy goals. Oil and gas will be obsolete by 2030. Australia has a solar advantage.
Nuclear is a doom day plan for Australia as it will be an expensive option, nuclear makes sense only in cold frozen areas like Russia.
Furthermore a nuclear disaster due to bushfires will destroy alot of lives. Its time to think wisely as nuclear is NOT the best option. For further information listen to Tony Seba.
Paris accord is not a legally binding document at all.
The Paris Agreement in fact relies on a fluid agreement with no definitions in International Law
The treaty has no legal teeth. It does not impose penalties, such as fees or embargos, for parties that violate its terms, and no International court or governing body is ready to enforce compliance.
With Nations wakening to the economic damage being done by the Paris Agreement will never act fast enough to mitigate and adapt to climate change, and developed countries will shirk their responsibility to fund climate action in developing states. New environmental norms are only given lip service, and the optics are manipulated.
COP26 meeting suggests this will be the norm withmany Nations defying or withdrawing from the treaty entirely.
Nope it’s not legally binding at all, in fact it’s a massive con job
The ol crack pipe hey
You madam are seriously delusional, renewables cannot cheaply or efficiently run a country, renewables are exactly what they say they are, life of ten years then we pay more to renew them, just laughable.
@@VK4VO do you have anythign to refute this besides muh emissions from mining
It's time to go Barnaby, the LNPs 12 years riding the taxpayer funded gravy train is over........👋
😆😆😆...
One day you will actually make sense.
How much coal is needed to make renewables ? How long does renewables last?
A lot and not very long.
All temperatures are Fahrenheit.
12-19-2024,
My city's official temperatures.
High: 78°
Low: 37°
Arctic Bay, Nunavut, Canada
High: -21°
Low: -31°
Wind chill. -52°
Amundsen-Scott, South Pole Station
High: -15°
Low: -22°
Wind chill. -39°
-2 to +11 F today 20 miles north of Anchorage Alaska
@Chris_at_Home Nunavut, Canada is more than 1,800 miles northeast of you.
As the crow flies.
Not only land fill but very very toxic land fill.
Renewables are not base load power
People are underestimating the value of the EV future.
247 EV v2g value with rooftop PV.
Benefits are TAX-FREE SAVINGS on:
No imported petroleum
No expensive grid electricity
No expensive gas heating, cooking, hotwater,
No expansion of grid generation or grid capacity construction costs. Rooftop PV 3cents $kWh.
TAX-FREE SAVINGS for higher marginal taxed people is the way to understand early adopters.
As more 'not so early adopters', in greater numbers, follow the lead of the wealthy then the daily duck curve of demand collapse will be the deadcat in the middle of the road 247 no demand curve 247.
SHTTSNPANTS is the feeling that the grid owners will get as 247 cashflow plummets.
A $TRILLIONS grid asset and no cashflow, wow.