We live in primitive times. I dream of the distant day when the men and women whose death is necessary to decide a “winner” tell their leaders to find some other way to settle their dispute.
@@hansolowe19 oddly no. or at least not likely, put i will concede that it is in the realm of plausibility. What while happen is something that we are seeing right now in Ukraine. Trench Warfare, long rang ballistic bombardment, drone strikes and SOFs.
man... i remember watching this series at about 4 am in the late 90s to early 00s... back in the days before watching videos online was possible at home... im talkin dial -up times!! lol
Their supply lines were too long. Their line was too weak in too many plances when the Russians finally did counter properly, after Stalingrad they should have all been allowed to perform a rapid and effective defensive retreat instead of just delaying the inevitable and slowly weakening all the force in the east. Lack of oil, hoping to capture the supplies they needed while their armies literally freeze and starve to death. It was a clusterfk like no other.
Their supply issues wouldn’t have been a problem if they used trucks instead of horses. Ppl assume the entire German military was fast and maneuverable because of Blitzkrieg but most of their army relied on horses. The Russians were equipped with American trucks.
@@BostonsF1nest Yes the Germans had no trucks and they starved Europe to death as they took all the farm horses so nobody could plough nor plant fodder so there was no cattle nor crops.
Germany destroyed 38k soviets tanks, over 18k soviet planes, taken prisoner of 10 million soviet prisoners, killed another 15 million soviet soldiers. Most countries would of fell as a result of this.
." And how we burned in the labour camps later thinking: What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive, and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if people had not simply sat there, palling with terror, but had understood that they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up an ambush of s half-dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The cursed machine would have ground to a halt. If, if, if ! We didn't love freedom enough. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterwards....." - AlexanderSolzhenitsyn, writer, gulagPrisoner, Nobel Peace Prize recipient. TheJews called theirBolshevist raids in the middle of the night ' Pajama parties ', when they would drag individuals and families away to their inhumanGulags, torture and firing squads..☠️⭐☠️...." TheCommunist soul is the soul ofJudaism. Hence it follows, that in theRussianRevolution * , the triumph ofCommunism was the triumph ofJudaism. " - RabbiWaton, ' A Program For TheJews And Humanity ', NY 1939. ☠️☠️......" TheBolshevistRevolution * inRussia was the work ofJewish brains, ofJewish dissatisfaction, ofJewish planning, who's goal is to create a NEW ORDER in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way inRussia, shall become reality all over the world. " - ' The AmericanHebrew ', September 10, 1920. ( * aCoupDétet funded from WallStreet thatGenocided over66million WhiteRussians, another16+million in Ukraine'sHolodomor's, tens of millions inChina afterRittenbergCoeEpsteinAdler brought in theirCommunism). 🎄....... " You have to understand, the leadingBolsheviks who took over Russia, were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatered they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. BolshevismCommitted the greatest slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators. " + 🎄...... " WithoutJews there would never have beenBolshevism. To aJew nothing is more insulting than the truth. The bloodthirsty jewishTerrorists have murdered sixty six million inRussia from 1918-57. " - Alexander Solzhenitsyn, writer, gulagPrisoner, Nobel Peace Prize recipient. ☠️☠️☠️....... "We mean the word 'red' literally because we shall shed such floods of blood as will make all the human losses suffered in the capitalist wars quake and pale by comparison. The biggest bankers across the ocean will work in the closest possible contact with us. If we win the revolution, we shall establish the power ofZionism upon the wreckage of the revolution's funeral, and we shall became a power before which the whole world will sink to its knees. We shall show what real power is. By means of terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce the Russian intelligentsia to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence... At the moment, our young men in their leather jackets, who are the sons of watchmakers from Odessa, Orsha, Gomel and Vinnitsa, know how to hate everything Russian! What pleasure they take in physically destroying the Russian intelligentsia - officers, academics and writers !..." -Taken from the "Memoirs" of Aron Simanovich, a jeweller at the court of the Tsar's Imperial Majesty..... ☠️☠️.... " AntiCommunism is antiSemitism. " - ' TheJewish Voice ', page 23, National Council of JewishCommunists, July-August 1943. gab.com/ROBODAN/posts/109404819053367088 ......gab.com/BothEyesOpen/posts/109578707246188552 .." The great RussianRevolution was indeed accomplished by the hands ofJews. There are noJews in the ranks of the RedArmy as far as Privates are concerned, but in the Committees, and in the Soviet organization as Commissars, theJews are gallantly leading the masses. The symbol ofJewry has become the symbol of the proletariat, which can be seen in the fact of the adoption of the FIVE POINTED STAR, which in former times was the symbol ofZIONISM andJEWRY. " - rabbiMichaelCohn, ' TheCommunist ', April, 13, 1919.
Alot of those numbers are overstated. People just took the German accounts at face value since the Soviet accounts were ridiculously small. Most of the losses Germans claimed were as a result of units being encircled.. but many of those soldiers escaped
4:00 You forgot to mention that originally the Italians were tasked to take the Balcans, to secure the Romanian oil fields, but failed, so German troops had to be diverted.
And boots with metal hobnails Russian infantry also did not wear socks - no blisters Instead they wrapped cloth bands around toes and feet Also sometimes stuffed straw down their boots
I always wondered why H man made fairly decent military decisions until halfway thru the war, then suddenly started making horrible military decisions, sacking 35 of his top military officers explains a lot
Attacking the much larger red army with a fraction of the tanks the reds had and low fuel supplies was a disastrous move. It was a gamble that the Soviet Union would collapse politically and militarily under the force of the invasion, but that outcome was never particularly likely.
No oil/fuel, supply lines way too stretched. You can play any strategy computer game, if you have endless troops and buildings producing tanks like the Soviets, you can just mark them all together with your mouse and send straight forward against an esports pro who has 1/4 of your tanks and troops and his tanks have only little fuel left + you are allowed to lose many battles like that because your base is several screens away on the map.
idk,theirs a lot of ppl who agree with that and a lot of ppl who dont and both sides have good points,I think the only way to have beaten the USSR was to have dealt with Britain first,and they were beating em in the battle for Britian but Goering changed from attacking the airfields to civilian targets and that gave the Brits the breathing space they needed,but the Brits were definitely losing the air war before that blunder,although it was getting expensive,it was working,but who knows,couldve wouldve shouldve right oh,and one more thing,if the Japanese had attacked from the East and Finland the north,then maybe the USSR couldve been defeated
They never had enough fuel, food and soldiers for a continuous campaign. Germany simply did not have the logistical capability to take over a country as large and with as many people as a Soviet union in 1941. As long as the Soviet did not surrender and continue to resist that the Germans would not have ever been able to completely subdueresistance
The weather at the time was too bad for motorized operations. It had rained a lot in March to May and the roads were muddy. Moving supply trucks or tanks would be very dificult making blitzkrieg look more like turtlekrieg. The germans waited for dry weather and dry russian roads.
The real reason for their defeat was that the Germans massively underestimated the strength of the Soviets. Even after losing massive numbers in 41 the Soviets were still able to start winning within a year and half. Imagine if Stalin would have been just a little more competent or lucky in 41/42, the war would have been over years earlier. In short the Germans should not have entertained the notion they had a serious chance of winning. This is what happens when you base your strategy on racism or bigotry rather than on reality. This is lesson that has still not been learnt by modern aggressors.
As now western countries underestimated the strength of Russia. Russia is producing more weapons than all countries in NATO combine. Russia is more than gas station.
The reason was simple. Germany was fighting in many fronts. Even so, they defeated russia in WWI. Stupid to think that the outcome of war depends on the driving ideology. Bad guys have won often enough in history.
Paulus couldn't break out. There was no fuel, no supply and not enough mechanized vehicles available. Any break out attempt would have ended in a total desaster anyway. 6th army's fate was sealed.
1941 - Germany stopped the advance to Moscow to help with the advancements to Kyiv and Leningrad, which gave the soviets time to dig defense lines and prepare 1942 - Germany overachieved goals for the Caucuses campaign, and had overstretched lines 1943 - Soviet intel reports figured of the German plans for Kursk, which gave the soviets valuable time to prepare for the attack. And it all came down in 1944, when Italy collapsed, Soviets launched Operation Bagration, which drove the Germans to Berlin, and D-day, which lead to the liberation of western Europe.
As a result of Operation Barbarossa, the Soviets instigated the creation of "an elaborate system of buffer and client states, designed to insulate the Soviet Union from any possible future attack."
Unfortunately the savior stories of the T-34 are way overstated. They were there since the beginning. So many of them were captured it was crazy. The T-34 only looks so good because it was a commom scapegoat for german failures.
The main reason they lost was because they underestimated the enemy. Just like Russia which invaded Ukraine with only 200,000 troops expecting Ukraine to fall within days. Now in the third year war is still going on.
@@JDDC-tq7qm Now yes but not in the begining. Who in his right mind will attack such a large country with a million strong army with only 200,000 troops?
Yes, I believe they should had of taken the Suez and tried to make peace with Britain before embarking on Barbarossa. Though it's easy to critique the past and who knows.
@@indian2003 that's what I said now Russia is fighting smart the thing is Russia thought Ukraine was going to negotiate with them until Ukraine refused and choose to fight now Ukraine is paying the price
that was before the woke grammar Nazis policed language. Documentaries used be for education before they all forced to be Goebel's style woke propaganda.
9 дней назад
I love to watch these videos with blurred images...
I don't think there was anything hitlah could do that could win or lose the war with USSR. USSR simply a larger country. Just like China was too big for Japan to control totally.
The other thing about the Russians. They didn't have as much trouble with their tanks and weapons in winter because they were used to the cold and what what to do to stop machines freezing. Also there tanks had wider tracks so were better on soft ground.
Thier tanks still froze and got stuck in the mud, that's why most IF not all of thier counterattacks failed until 1943 with the introduction of the IS-2
Not even Eisenhower ever intervened in day-to-day operations despite being Supreme Allied Commander for Europe, except for if it needed mediation of sorts. FDR was far smarter.
Speaking of strategic errors-- This program gets the German talkeover of the Balkan wrong as far as motives.. Hitlers army had been planning on invading Russia by the Middle of may 1941-- But Because the Greeks kicked the snot out of the italians under Mussollini Germany had to go to Italys rescue.. It only took 5 weeks.. But those 5 weeks meant that Germans didn't get to the outskirts of Moscow until November / december after General winter had intervened on the side of the Russians. The Russians counterattacked stalling the Germans. And from there the Germans were never able to regain their earlier sucesses.. best Bruce Peek
Actually modern historian do not think the Balkan distraction affected the launch date of Barbarossa. The weather was bad in the USSR so they could not start earlier, and the Germans actually did better when General winter was around since the muddy roads were frozen and their tanks could proceed towards Moscow. It was the annual rains of October that slowed the Germans down. There is really no way that the socialists of Germany could have won that war once the allies decided they would resist. Britain blocked oil to the continent in 1939 and by itself likely would have eventually beaten Germany but it may have taken decades like the cold war.
It's the blurring out that puts me off, just so it can me monetised, as one comment also said the same story rehashed, heard many say History hit is not worth the subscription due to 20 minutes videos etc shame great idea but it's the blurring that makes me turn off.
There were no such agreement. So there is nothing to mention. There was an agreemen on sphere of influence, which many countries have, for instanse US has Monro doctrine
Not progressing onto Moscow in ‘41 was not…imho…a “strategic error”…as is well-documented Germany’s foodstuffs situation was about to become acute and the National Socialists needed to secure Ukraine to secure their food supplies; they also needed a base in Southern Russia in which to make a run at the Russian oilfields as Germany was acutely short on oil supplies in which to wage war. Good thing the Germans failed in any case.
That was the Japanese biggest strategic misunderstanding that they didn't open east front of russia 2. The main problem of germans was not the cold weather that was iranian south to north Railway system that englands and americans used this railway to send supply, ammunition to russia via iran. Again germans were not blocked by winter they lost the Barbarossa because of strategic iranian supply and railway system.
The biggest mistake the Germans made was that in Oct of 41 they were in remarkable good shape , they up to that point had a regimen of combat for 3 weeks and rest reorganize for 1 week. So there it was at end of Oct in great shape with winter about to begin they broke that regimen in trying to get to Moscow. And they wasted the advantage they had.
Somebody correct me if I’m wrong and I certainly could be. It was my understanding that Germany and Japan had in fact corresponded that it was very likely for Japan to attack the U.S. and that if they did it would be at Hawaii. And so when Japan did, it was really no surprise that Germany declared war on the U.S. right away.
Words of wisdom spoken here!, Americas massive logistical support of Russia played a decisive role! Americans you are the slaves of your money masters, you know who i am talking about, the same crowd that sent millions from Brooklyn all the way to Leningrad to finance the Bolshevik takeover of Russia!
@@JoaoSoares-rs6ecthe will of the Russian people to defend their homeland will overpower anything even without usa help Russia would win the a greater price tho
Blurring out the carnage minimizes the carnage of war. True documentaries show everything that was actually filmed of the war by the correspondent photographers. If filming death of fallen troops was not important it would have not been filmed in the first place. Shame on you in your attempts to eliminate the facts of war.
Germany always have 80% of its best troops against SSSR, yes the fate of WW2 was decided at Stalingrad and Kursk. Without attacking SSSR, Germany would win WW2.
Germany should have went after the oil fields in Russia first refresher didn't have fuel how could they have moved the massive number of tanks does oil fields are so far south they would have had a logistic nightmare just to keep their troops Supply
Do you know that land-lease began only after a fundamental change towards the Soviet Union? After winning the key battles of Kursk and Stalingrad in 1942.
Lend lease contribution only saw implementation when the reds were already on the offensive. Look at the losses. U.S. : about 400,000 globally from 1941-1945. Soviet Union: 25 million + on a single front. Stop giving U.S. so much credit. If Germany didn't invade soviets, there would be no western front. Spilled blood of every man on the eastern front bought U.S. and U.K. time and space to do anything they wanted. Atlantic naval warfare, air raids, offensives in Africa, Italy, preparation for offensive in France in 1944 and creation of the atomic bomb in U.S. If Germany had all of its resources and manpower focused on the west, Africa and the Atlantic ocean, there would be no amphibious operation strong enough to overcome Hitler's war machine. Churchill, FDR and numerous western generals knew and commented that without soviets, there would be no victory.
It was mostly a failure of logistics. Russian railroad tracks were different sizes than rest of Europe and the Russians burned them. Germany was low on trucks and were depending on trains so they had to lay track as they moved forward. Germany was low on oil when the war started (and was the actual reason for the war) so coal was their primary fuel and trains were the only form of transportation that could use it. Russia also scorch earthed as they retreated leaving no supplies for an army that was supposed to forage for supplies as they moved. It was a logistic clusterfork like the Napoleon's death march. The US supplied a huge number of trucks to USSR after the invasion which greatly helped them beat back the Germans. The USSR was able to get supplies to the front far faster and more efficiently than the Germans. Supplies for the Germans came by rail and then where commonly moved by horse and wagon to front lines. The number of horses that died in both great wars was measured in the millions. Originally used for transportation they eventually became a food source for starving soldiers and populations.
It's crazy that so many Russians surrenderd during this war seems like it was better to surrenderd than put up any kind of a fight and then to realize at the end of the war j very few made it back home we're talking about millions of Russian soldiers so crazy 🤣
Nah. Germans lost due to a logistical error. By accident OKH handed Paulus staff the wrong maps. Apparently, instead of Stalingrad, they got the Illfracombe-Barnstaple section. God knows where the proper maps ended up...
Less than three minutes into the video and a gross factual error. "Soviet Union was unprepared". These lies get repeated so much that some people started to believe them. Soviet Union had twenty years (1921 to 1941) to prepare for war. And they did - they had the largest army with the best equipment and strategically weakened enemy. The Reich was in two years into the war already with most potent powers turned against them (UK, US). The US was willing to provide USSR with a lot - raw materials, garments, food and war equipment (tanks, lorries, jeeps, planes), and they did. If this is not being prepared, than I do not know what is.
They always talk about Kursk but I think there was an even larger battle on the way to Moscow. It wasn’t as sexy. Look up the battle of Brody. No Tigers or Panthers. Without that brand name recognition, and the fearful 88, it becomes just a footnote in history.
The Germans should not have attempted an invasion of that magnitude in the first place they were totally unprepared the operation was doomed from the start
The soviet union would invade the reich eventually. Question is: would it be better to defend against the soviets rather than conquer them? Germany would still fight a 2 front war that way
Russia had ten times as much manpower, and America feeding it all the military equipment it could handle. Without America, Russia would have folded fast from its lack of a manufacturing base.
The USSR would have collapsed without the Lend-Lease Act and help from Britain (intelligence). Loss of food would have sealed the fate of the soviets (unless helped by foreign powers fighting for communism) The soviets got enough food from the USA to feed its soldiers for the rest of the war, 12 million boots , 60 percent aluminum and steel, a lot of tin , 90 percent of railway equipment ( the soviets would never have been able to conduct offensives so fast and transfer their main armies to critical points , 300000 trucks were given , 65 percent of aviation fuel and much more apart from 15 percent tanks ,aircrafts Soviet sympathizers say "only 15 per cent was given to USSR"
largest oil nation getting most of it aviation fuel from a nation not know for fuel production. Britain could not help France and itself but helping Russia . No Western power can defeat Russia. Russia has occupied warsaw, berlin, paris , defeated Swedish empire , defeated Ottoman Empire . I can not say the same for any western countries
You are delisional. US only delivered 2000 locomotives, while USSR had 28000 of those. The same with trucks - USSR had 700k trucks at the beginning of the war. Most of lend-lease deliveries 85% happened after Stalingrad battle and battle of Moscow, when Germany already LOST the war.
Feels like the script for this video was written by AI. Then someone with no knowledge of the topic struck out major sections to keep it under an hour long. Not sure where one would even find such dreadful maps either
What helped the Russians a lot was, the English broke the German's Enigma code and were sending the Russians information where it was probable and when a German attack would come from. That saved the Russians a lot of casualties.
Not true, the British did not share Engima decrypted secrets with the Russia. They did not want the knowledge that German Engima code was compromised be known by the Germans at least in 1940 to early 1945.
Let's not talk about Russia and casualties. They suffered over 25 million dead and Stalin made an order that made it clear that their doctrine is human wave attacks and meatshield defense. There was absolutely no care taken in reducing soviet casualties. And not just people. The ratio of losses in battles on average was 10-1 and sometimes even greater when it came to tanks and aircraft. They had civilians barred from evacuating and were forced to help military construct trenches, mines and other defensive emplacements. They had female teenage school girls man artillery and anti aircraft guns. In Leningrad parents ate their own children due to starvation because Stalin refused to let civilians escape the siege.
@@xFlared Whatever, but the reality is that the vast bulk of the 5,533,000 German military KIA was killed of by them Ruskies. Some 3,900,000 of German military deaths were killed off by the Red Army during WW2. The credible estimates of Russian military deaths range from around over 8,000,000 to as high as 10,700,000. Overall the exchange ratio during WW2 was 2.2 to 2.8 Russian military deaths for every German military death. A large percentage approx 40% to 30% of Russian military deaths during WW2 was when they were POWs in German military custody during WW2. Some 600 Werhmacht/Waffen SS/Luftwaffee Field Divs were destroyed by the Red Army during WW2. Some 70+ German Divs were destroyed by the Western Allies in 1944/45. Could Russia destroy 600+ German Divs without Western Allied (mainly US) direct material aid & Bomber Raids that curtailed German war production. Quite probably not, it possible that the USSR would have surrendred or negoiated a seperate peace. If there was say 3 or 4 more Pz Divs, 15 or so more Volksgreandier Divs, 15 or 20 more fighter gruppen with triple the quantities of available Arty mutions & POL in 1944 in France not around Normandy during D day. The outcome may have been materially different.
Funny how they keep saying weather won the war for Soviet Union or Russians armies do so much planning and they can't think of the season of the year lol I'm sure weather did its little part but over all it's not a big factor at least should not be for the army of any kind otherwise what were they doing there to begin with Just my opinion Pretty much don't need to keep saying weather is the only thing that helped the red army otherwise I like this documentary so far
Its insane to think all of this actually happened. WW2 i mean. Its nuts..
And not all that long ago
We live in primitive times. I dream of the distant day when the men and women whose death is necessary to decide a “winner” tell their leaders to find some other way to settle their dispute.
Ww3 will be with drone swarms. Or worse.
@@hansolowe19 oddly no. or at least not likely, put i will concede that it is in the realm of plausibility. What while happen is something that we are seeing right now in Ukraine. Trench Warfare, long rang ballistic bombardment, drone strikes and SOFs.
Oh, and it will repeat itself. Just wait 10 years and Europe will be in Ruins again.
man... i remember watching this series at about 4 am in the late 90s to early 00s... back in the days before watching videos online was possible at home... im talkin dial -up times!! lol
I was in a ww2 documentary mood this evening so this was great timing
Their supply lines were too long. Their line was too weak in too many plances when the Russians finally did counter properly, after Stalingrad they should have all been allowed to perform a rapid and effective defensive retreat instead of just delaying the inevitable and slowly weakening all the force in the east. Lack of oil, hoping to capture the supplies they needed while their armies literally freeze and starve to death. It was a clusterfk like no other.
It was an ongoing shared fantasy. Daily defensive action's, constant retreat.
And US lend lease to the USSR. Uncle Sam saved the reds.
Keep lying to yourself where was American lend lease when Napoleon invaded Russia 😂😂@@RafaelSantos-pi8py
Their supply issues wouldn’t have been a problem if they used trucks instead of horses. Ppl assume the entire German military was fast and maneuverable because of Blitzkrieg but most of their army relied on horses. The Russians were equipped with American trucks.
@@BostonsF1nest Yes the Germans had no trucks and they starved Europe to death as they took all the farm horses so nobody could plough nor plant fodder so there was no cattle nor crops.
Unlike the 66 diff rehashed WW2 Eastern Front vids this 1 is actually the great WW2 In Color series from '09.
Germany destroyed 38k soviets tanks, over 18k soviet planes, taken prisoner of 10 million soviet prisoners, killed another 15 million soviet soldiers. Most countries would of fell as a result of this.
." And how we burned in the labour camps later thinking: What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive, and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if people had not simply sat there, palling with terror, but had understood that they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up an ambush of s half-dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The cursed machine would have ground to a halt. If, if, if ! We didn't love freedom enough. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterwards....." - AlexanderSolzhenitsyn, writer, gulagPrisoner, Nobel Peace Prize recipient. TheJews called theirBolshevist raids in the middle of the night ' Pajama parties ', when they would drag individuals and families away to their inhumanGulags, torture and firing squads..☠️⭐☠️...." TheCommunist soul is the soul ofJudaism. Hence it follows, that in theRussianRevolution * , the triumph ofCommunism was the triumph ofJudaism. " - RabbiWaton, ' A Program For TheJews And Humanity ', NY 1939. ☠️☠️......" TheBolshevistRevolution * inRussia was the work ofJewish brains, ofJewish dissatisfaction, ofJewish planning, who's goal is to create a NEW ORDER in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way inRussia, shall become reality all over the world. " - ' The AmericanHebrew ', September 10, 1920. ( * aCoupDétet funded from WallStreet thatGenocided over66million WhiteRussians, another16+million in Ukraine'sHolodomor's, tens of millions inChina afterRittenbergCoeEpsteinAdler brought in theirCommunism). 🎄....... " You have to understand, the leadingBolsheviks who took over Russia, were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatered they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. BolshevismCommitted the greatest slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators. " + 🎄...... " WithoutJews there would never have beenBolshevism. To aJew nothing is more insulting than the truth. The bloodthirsty jewishTerrorists have murdered sixty six million inRussia from 1918-57. " - Alexander Solzhenitsyn, writer, gulagPrisoner, Nobel Peace Prize recipient. ☠️☠️☠️....... "We mean the word 'red' literally because we shall shed such floods of blood as will make all the human losses suffered in the capitalist wars quake and pale by comparison. The biggest bankers across the ocean will work in the closest possible contact with us. If we win the revolution, we shall establish the power ofZionism upon the wreckage of the revolution's funeral, and we shall became a power before which the whole world will sink to its knees. We shall show what real power is. By means of terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce the Russian intelligentsia to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence... At the moment, our young men in their leather jackets, who are the sons of watchmakers from Odessa, Orsha, Gomel and Vinnitsa, know how to hate everything Russian! What pleasure they take in physically destroying the Russian intelligentsia - officers, academics and writers !..." -Taken from the "Memoirs" of Aron Simanovich, a jeweller at the court of the Tsar's Imperial Majesty..... ☠️☠️.... " AntiCommunism is antiSemitism. " - ' TheJewish Voice ', page 23, National Council of JewishCommunists, July-August 1943.
gab.com/ROBODAN/posts/109404819053367088 ......gab.com/BothEyesOpen/posts/109578707246188552 .." The great RussianRevolution was indeed accomplished by the hands ofJews. There are noJews in the ranks of the RedArmy as far as Privates are concerned, but in the Committees, and in the Soviet organization as Commissars, theJews are gallantly leading the masses. The symbol ofJewry has become the symbol of the proletariat, which can be seen in the fact of the adoption of the FIVE POINTED STAR, which in former times was the symbol ofZIONISM andJEWRY. " - rabbiMichaelCohn, ' TheCommunist ', April, 13, 1919.
And bare in mind a third of Hitler's power was in West Europe
Alot of those numbers are overstated. People just took the German accounts at face value since the Soviet accounts were ridiculously small. Most of the losses Germans claimed were as a result of units being encircled.. but many of those soldiers escaped
have* can't you spell?
Many of those 15 million soldiers killed were actually murdered civilians
4:00 You forgot to mention that originally the Italians were tasked to take the Balcans, to secure the Romanian oil fields, but failed, so German troops had to be diverted.
So, the Germans had been defeated by General Winter! Stupid Cold War theory.
Germans fighting in minus 45 degrees in their summer clothes is something of a sight. 🤣
yeah like what where they thinking. Its not like they didnt have winter clothes, but just didnt issue them in time. Idiots
I go out in my goose down coat when it's zero and I'm cold can't imagine the summer clothes they wore at minus 40 degrees
And boots with metal hobnails
Russian infantry also did not wear socks - no blisters
Instead they wrapped cloth bands around toes and feet
Also sometimes stuffed straw down their boots
Και με τις ίδιες στολές πήγαν στο Σταλινγκρατ __40 βαθμούς Κελσίου 😅
Not even Meth was enough to warm them up in that brutal Russian winter
Never gets old
Sir you are a man of culture.
The problem with blitzkreig is it exhaust a lot of supplies in a relatively short period. Making it very difficult to keep it up.
one of the best documentaries i have ever seen
Best summary I have seen. Great work thank you
I always wondered why H man made fairly decent military decisions until halfway thru the war, then suddenly started making horrible military decisions, sacking 35 of his top military officers explains a lot
Attacking the much larger red army with a fraction of the tanks the reds had and low fuel supplies was a disastrous move. It was a gamble that the Soviet Union would collapse politically and militarily under the force of the invasion, but that outcome was never particularly likely.
No oil/fuel, supply lines way too stretched. You can play any strategy computer game, if you have endless troops and buildings producing tanks like the Soviets, you can just mark them all together with your mouse and send straight forward against an esports pro who has 1/4 of your tanks and troops and his tanks have only little fuel left + you are allowed to lose many battles like that because your base is several screens away on the map.
Barbarossa was delayed by a good 3 months. If it weren't for the delay and turmoil with the Balkan campaign, it would have ended differently...
How do you think it would end if they did it then
idk,theirs a lot of ppl who agree with that and a lot of ppl who dont and both sides have good points,I think the only way to have beaten the USSR was to have dealt with Britain first,and they were beating em in the battle for Britian but Goering changed from attacking the airfields to civilian targets and that gave the Brits the breathing space they needed,but the Brits were definitely losing the air war before that blunder,although it was getting expensive,it was working,but who knows,couldve wouldve shouldve right
oh,and one more thing,if the Japanese had attacked from the East and Finland the north,then maybe the USSR couldve been defeated
Ah an Italian tank commander
They never had enough fuel, food and soldiers for a continuous campaign. Germany simply did not have the logistical capability to take over a country as large and with as many people as a Soviet union in 1941.
As long as the Soviet did not surrender and continue to resist that the Germans would not have ever been able to completely subdueresistance
The weather at the time was too bad for motorized operations. It had rained a lot in March to May and the roads were muddy. Moving supply trucks or tanks would be very dificult making blitzkrieg look more like turtlekrieg. The germans waited for dry weather and dry russian roads.
History repeats its self.Great lesson we learn from these doc.
A problem is that people don't learn from history and continue to repeat the same mistakes. Some people want to regress to the 1800s.
Pol Pot, Mau, Lenin, Stalin, they all make the 1800s look pretty darn good....
The real reason for their defeat was that the Germans massively underestimated the strength of the Soviets. Even after losing massive numbers in 41 the Soviets were still able to start winning within a year and half. Imagine if Stalin would have been just a little more competent or lucky in 41/42, the war would have been over years earlier. In short the Germans should not have entertained the notion they had a serious chance of winning. This is what happens when you base your strategy on racism or bigotry rather than on reality. This is lesson that has still not been learnt by modern aggressors.
As now western countries underestimated the strength of Russia. Russia is producing more weapons than all countries in NATO combine. Russia is more than gas station.
Imagine if the French had competent leadership. In many ways socialist Germany was kind of lucky at the start.
Agree with your view
So true.
The reason was simple. Germany was fighting in many fronts. Even so, they defeated russia in WWI. Stupid to think that the outcome of war depends on the driving ideology. Bad guys have won often enough in history.
This was a good quality docomentary. A bit glitchy re Stalingrad but on the whole a good summary. :)
Excellent!
The day Germany marched into Russia was the day they lost the way. The Day Japan attacked the U.S. is the day they lost.
No?! Really! Wow!!!! I think you’re the first one to have ever figure it out. You must be a genius! ❤
@@AnastasioCostaMeno do you even understand point of comments?
Germany had previously marched into russia and won the war WWI.
they came for the women...
Germany was never Not going to invade Russia that was Hitler's whole goal
Paulus couldn't break out. There was no fuel, no supply and not enough mechanized vehicles available. Any break out attempt would have ended in a total desaster anyway. 6th army's fate was sealed.
1941 - Germany stopped the advance to Moscow to help with the advancements to Kyiv and Leningrad, which gave the soviets time to dig defense lines and prepare
1942 - Germany overachieved goals for the Caucuses campaign, and had overstretched lines
1943 - Soviet intel reports figured of the German plans for Kursk, which gave the soviets valuable time to prepare for the attack.
And it all came down in 1944, when Italy collapsed, Soviets launched Operation Bagration, which drove the Germans to Berlin, and D-day, which lead to the liberation of western Europe.
Probably seen it already but....
I'll bite
Thank you
That's a voice that tells the truth 🏆🙏
Hitler's Speeches had a "party like" feeling, like a modern day rock concert
Really? How many did you attend, Heinrich? Methinks you are full of it.
@@SuperOdyssjust watch the films taken at the time. He is right.
Actually, they seem to have more than a few similarities with Trump rallies. Totally baffling to those that haven't imbibed the koolaid.
There was no way it would work because the Russians could simply send in there army's from the far east with zero worry from Japan.
All other aspects are moot.
Barbarossa was militarily insane.
Their southern flank was never secure!
As a result of Operation Barbarossa, the Soviets instigated the creation of "an elaborate system of buffer and client states, designed to insulate the Soviet Union from any possible future attack."
They were already doing that. It started with Poland. The Red curtain
It worked. The USSR collapsed before anyone attacked it.
A very nice historical summation.
Why blurry some things here thats part of history and other stuff on youtube is open for everyone to see
RUclips does it.
General Winter
Unfortunately the savior stories of the T-34 are way overstated. They were there since the beginning. So many of them were captured it was crazy. The T-34 only looks so good because it was a commom scapegoat for german failures.
The main reason they lost was because they underestimated the enemy. Just like Russia which invaded Ukraine with only 200,000 troops expecting Ukraine to fall within days. Now in the third year war is still going on.
yeah i agree
But difference is Russia is fighting smart in Ukraine now while Germany was making mistakes after mistakes against the Soviets
@@JDDC-tq7qm Now yes but not in the begining. Who in his right mind will attack such a large country with a million strong army with only 200,000 troops?
Yes, I believe they should had of taken the Suez and tried to make peace with Britain before embarking on Barbarossa. Though it's easy to critique the past and who knows.
@@indian2003 that's what I said now Russia is fighting smart the thing is Russia thought Ukraine was going to negotiate with them until Ukraine refused and choose to fight now Ukraine is paying the price
Great documentary but I'm surprised the phase "German defense" in regard to German troops on foreign soil made it through edit.
that was before the woke grammar Nazis policed language. Documentaries used be for education before they all forced to be Goebel's style woke propaganda.
I love to watch these videos with blurred images...
The t-34 did not weigh 37 tons, but 29 tons. One-sided video as well.
My Dad told me a lot of things about WW2 in Europe.
I don't think there was anything hitlah could do that could win or lose the war with USSR. USSR simply a larger country. Just like China was too big for Japan to control totally.
The other thing about the Russians. They didn't have as much trouble with their tanks and weapons in winter because they were used to the cold and what what to do to stop machines freezing. Also there tanks had wider tracks so were better on soft ground.
Thier tanks still froze and got stuck in the mud, that's why most IF not all of thier counterattacks failed until 1943 with the introduction of the IS-2
imagine FDR telling Eisenhower or Patton how to army..
welp, thats the short answer on why..
Not even Eisenhower ever intervened in day-to-day operations despite being Supreme Allied Commander for Europe, except for if it needed mediation of sorts. FDR was far smarter.
Speaking of strategic errors-- This program gets the German talkeover of the Balkan wrong as far as motives.. Hitlers army had been planning on invading Russia by the Middle of may 1941-- But Because the Greeks kicked the snot out of the italians under Mussollini Germany had to go to Italys rescue.. It only took 5 weeks.. But those 5 weeks meant that Germans didn't get to the outskirts of Moscow until November / december after General winter had intervened on the side of the Russians. The Russians counterattacked stalling the Germans. And from there the Germans were never able to regain their earlier sucesses..
best
Bruce Peek
Actually modern historian do not think the Balkan distraction affected the launch date of Barbarossa. The weather was bad in the USSR so they could not start earlier, and the Germans actually did better when General winter was around since the muddy roads were frozen and their tanks could proceed towards Moscow. It was the annual rains of October that slowed the Germans down.
There is really no way that the socialists of Germany could have won that war once the allies decided they would resist. Britain blocked oil to the continent in 1939 and by itself likely would have eventually beaten Germany but it may have taken decades like the cold war.
It's the blurring out that puts me off, just so it can me monetised, as one comment also said the same story rehashed, heard many say History hit is not worth the subscription due to 20 minutes videos etc shame great idea but it's the blurring that makes me turn off.
The best WW2 Documentaries are SOVIET STORM: WW2 In the East, WW2 in Color, The Operations Room and Kings & Generals.
BS, I was there!
You should listen to tikhisory’s series on Stalingrad.
Good to be here early 😁😁😁
4:47 ουπς λάθος, εμείς οι Έλληνες χαλάσαμε τα σχέδια του ΜουρλοΧιτλερ, οπότε δεν είναι έτσι όπως τα λες 😉🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷
No mention of russia and german agreement to invade poland from east and west. Katyn Forest
There were no such agreement. So there is nothing to mention. There was an agreemen on sphere of influence, which many countries have, for instanse US has Monro doctrine
Not progressing onto Moscow in ‘41 was not…imho…a “strategic error”…as is well-documented Germany’s foodstuffs situation was about to become acute and the National Socialists needed to secure Ukraine to secure their food supplies; they also needed a base in Southern Russia in which to make a run at the Russian oilfields as Germany was acutely short on oil supplies in which to wage war. Good thing the Germans failed in any case.
Yet, Lessons are unlearned from these,
You must be kidding. It wasn't a failure. It was just plain stupid.
That was the Japanese biggest strategic misunderstanding that they didn't open east front of russia
2. The main problem of germans was not the cold weather that was iranian south to north Railway system that englands and americans used this railway to send supply, ammunition to russia via iran.
Again germans were not blocked by winter they lost the Barbarossa because of strategic iranian supply and railway system.
British and Soviets invaded Iran 😂😂
I still think the Guderian march through Moscow if will not be returned at that point Germany whould have won
The biggest mistake the Germans made was that in Oct of 41 they were in remarkable good shape , they up to that point had a regimen of combat for 3 weeks and rest reorganize for 1 week. So there it was at end of Oct in great shape with winter about to begin they broke that regimen in trying to get to Moscow. And they wasted the advantage they had.
The mistake was attacking russia in the first place.
Crank is hella of a drug!
Somebody correct me if I’m wrong and I certainly could be. It was my understanding that Germany and Japan had in fact corresponded that it was very likely for Japan to attack the U.S. and that if they did it would be at Hawaii. And so when Japan did, it was really no surprise that Germany declared war on the U.S. right away.
Essentially logistics, but we also have to admit one thing, if not for US help and supplies, Russia would have had greater difficulty if not lost
Train's, Locamotives and Rolling Stock into the ten's of thousands, many still running today were the critical difference
@@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg yes it was
Words of wisdom spoken here!, Americas massive logistical support of Russia played a decisive role! Americans you are the slaves of your money masters, you know who i am talking about, the same crowd that sent millions from Brooklyn all the way to Leningrad to finance the Bolshevik takeover of Russia!
Uncle Sam's lend lease saved the reds, even if the commies don't want to admit it.
@@JoaoSoares-rs6ecthe will of the Russian people to defend their homeland will overpower anything even without usa help Russia would win the a greater price tho
Blurring out the carnage minimizes the carnage of war. True documentaries show everything that was actually filmed of the war by the correspondent photographers. If filming death of fallen troops was not important it would have not been filmed in the first place. Shame on you in your attempts to eliminate the facts of war.
I thought RUclips was against posting others material 😂😂😂😂😂
49:05-49:15 "largest armored battle of ww2" - soviet propaganda detected.
Germany always have 80% of its best troops against SSSR, yes the fate of WW2 was decided at Stalingrad and Kursk. Without attacking SSSR, Germany would win WW2.
How is that propaganda?
Isn't this Netflix?
Your maps of Europe in 1941 is wrong!!france Netherlands and Norway was already occupied!! Wtf!!
Provide some links and it will help you prove right. I think it's important in this argument you present.
Stop it!! NO reason to get excited!!!
@@razzypatiencedoyledoyle7141 stating fact is indicative of excitement ??
There are a few things wrong in this particular video.
@@razzypatiencedoyledoyle7141Hey, this is war!! This could change our strategy completely!! 😂
Pucking Zanis
Germany should have went after the oil fields in Russia first refresher didn't have fuel how could they have moved the massive number of tanks does oil fields are so far south they would have had a logistic nightmare just to keep their troops Supply
Is this narrated by Faramir ?
44:37
1st Russia is too big, 2nd Germany was too small (especially in resources) 3rd That american lend-lease saved the russians even if they deny it.
Do you know that land-lease began only after a fundamental change towards the Soviet Union? After winning the key battles of Kursk and Stalingrad in 1942.
Lend lease contribution only saw implementation when the reds were already on the offensive. Look at the losses. U.S. : about 400,000 globally from 1941-1945. Soviet Union: 25 million + on a single front. Stop giving U.S. so much credit. If Germany didn't invade soviets, there would be no western front. Spilled blood of every man on the eastern front bought U.S. and U.K. time and space to do anything they wanted. Atlantic naval warfare, air raids, offensives in Africa, Italy, preparation for offensive in France in 1944 and creation of the atomic bomb in U.S. If Germany had all of its resources and manpower focused on the west, Africa and the Atlantic ocean, there would be no amphibious operation strong enough to overcome Hitler's war machine. Churchill, FDR and numerous western generals knew and commented that without soviets, there would be no victory.
Am on a quest to find out who the man with the Afro is,, hope he made it home from the camps, he’s always shown
Most likely executed because he was non-white. Sad but true.
It was mostly a failure of logistics. Russian railroad tracks were different sizes than rest of Europe and the Russians burned them. Germany was low on trucks and were depending on trains so they had to lay track as they moved forward. Germany was low on oil when the war started (and was the actual reason for the war) so coal was their primary fuel and trains were the only form of transportation that could use it. Russia also scorch earthed as they retreated leaving no supplies for an army that was supposed to forage for supplies as they moved. It was a logistic clusterfork like the Napoleon's death march. The US supplied a huge number of trucks to USSR after the invasion which greatly helped them beat back the Germans. The USSR was able to get supplies to the front far faster and more efficiently than the Germans. Supplies for the Germans came by rail and then where commonly moved by horse and wagon to front lines. The number of horses that died in both great wars was measured in the millions. Originally used for transportation they eventually became a food source for starving soldiers and populations.
21:41 this is what saved USSR. If not for the siberian units they would’ve lost the war.
35:34 “Thirteen and a half Thousand” guns. Who talks like that?
Also since when does that translate to 132,000?
forget them
rumania?
It's crazy that so many Russians surrenderd during this war seems like it was better to surrenderd than put up any kind of a fight and then to realize at the end of the war j very few made it back home we're talking about millions of Russian soldiers so crazy 🤣
This whole series is unashamedly pro-brit! They don't even show FDR in the intro! British revisionists at work here!
It is a British series that was shown on British TV.
1 mistake, is attaking the Soviet Union
It's ridiculous that history needs to be censored to appease to advertisers.
Nah. Germans lost due to a logistical error. By accident OKH handed Paulus staff the wrong maps. Apparently, instead of Stalingrad, they got the Illfracombe-Barnstaple section. God knows where the proper maps ended up...
Less than three minutes into the video and a gross factual error. "Soviet Union was unprepared". These lies get repeated so much that some people started to believe them.
Soviet Union had twenty years (1921 to 1941) to prepare for war.
And they did - they had the largest army with the best equipment and strategically weakened enemy.
The Reich was in two years into the war already with most potent powers turned against them (UK, US).
The US was willing to provide USSR with a lot - raw materials, garments, food and war equipment (tanks, lorries, jeeps, planes), and they did.
If this is not being prepared, than I do not know what is.
U can't beat the Russian winter just ask Napoleon
And Charles XII of Sweden
Got anything else So Obvious to add?
@@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg we all know you had to Google it 😂
@@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg Pretty snarky comment but still humorous 🙂👍
They always talk about Kursk but I think there was an even larger battle on the way to Moscow. It wasn’t as sexy. Look up the battle of Brody.
No Tigers or Panthers. Without that brand name recognition, and the fearful 88, it becomes just a footnote in history.
Also known as the battle of Dubno.
Think that you are correct.
@@IanCross-xj2gj Yes, sir. One of the “border battles” of the first 7 days or so of Operation Barbarossa. Army Group South driving to Kiev.
The Germans should not have attempted an invasion of that magnitude in the first place they were totally unprepared the operation was doomed from the start
Germany invaded Greece thus delaying their invasion of Russia and the winter got them.
The soviet union would invade the reich eventually. Question is: would it be better to defend against the soviets rather than conquer them? Germany would still fight a 2 front war that way
Shorter supply line, less front to cover and less oil usage. The Germans would’ve definitely done better on a counteroffensive war.
They ran out of snack packs.
No they didn't! The yanks supplied the Red Army with millions of cans of spam.
No! The yanks supplied the Red Army with millions of cans of spam.
Is it wierd that even though I'm not german nor overly pro war, i find myself not just rooting for germany but even mildly annoyed at their blunders?
Russia had ten times as much manpower, and America feeding it all the military equipment it could handle. Without America, Russia would have folded fast from its lack of a manufacturing base.
Where did you get 10x times manpower? German controlled territory with larger manpower that time, no even counting their european allies.
The USSR would have collapsed without the Lend-Lease Act and help from Britain (intelligence).
Loss of food would have sealed the fate of the soviets (unless helped by foreign powers fighting for communism)
The soviets got enough food from the USA to feed its soldiers for the rest of the war,
12 million boots , 60 percent aluminum and steel, a lot of tin , 90 percent of railway equipment ( the soviets would never have been able to conduct offensives so fast and transfer their main armies to critical points , 300000 trucks were given , 65 percent of aviation fuel and much more apart from 15 percent tanks ,aircrafts
Soviet sympathizers say "only 15 per cent was given to USSR"
largest oil nation getting most of it aviation fuel from a nation not know for fuel production. Britain could not help France and itself but helping Russia .
No Western power can defeat Russia. Russia has occupied warsaw, berlin, paris , defeated Swedish empire , defeated Ottoman Empire . I can not say the same for any western countries
You are delisional. US only delivered 2000 locomotives, while USSR had 28000 of those. The same with trucks - USSR had 700k trucks at the beginning of the war. Most of lend-lease deliveries 85% happened after Stalingrad battle and battle of Moscow, when Germany already LOST the war.
And remember you will NEVER proof that USSR didn't have 28000 locomotives, as this is truth
Did they really have to defend there southern flank ?????
Couldn't they just let yougoslovia and greece chill ???? Lol
Feels like the script for this video was written by AI. Then someone with no knowledge of the topic struck out major sections to keep it under an hour long.
Not sure where one would even find such dreadful maps either
Stalin was no joke! Greater evil man.
The Germans were foolish not to harnass the Ukranians who hated Stalin !
What helped the Russians a lot was, the English broke the German's Enigma code
and were sending the Russians information where it was probable and when a German attack would come from. That saved the Russians a lot of casualties.
Not true, the British did not share Engima decrypted secrets with the Russia. They did not want the knowledge that German Engima code was compromised be known by the Germans at least in 1940 to early 1945.
Let's not talk about Russia and casualties. They suffered over 25 million dead and Stalin made an order that made it clear that their doctrine is human wave attacks and meatshield defense. There was absolutely no care taken in reducing soviet casualties. And not just people. The ratio of losses in battles on average was 10-1 and sometimes even greater when it came to tanks and aircraft. They had civilians barred from evacuating and were forced to help military construct trenches, mines and other defensive emplacements. They had female teenage school girls man artillery and anti aircraft guns. In Leningrad parents ate their own children due to starvation because Stalin refused to let civilians escape the siege.
@@xFlared Whatever, but the reality is that the vast bulk of the 5,533,000 German military KIA was killed of by them Ruskies. Some 3,900,000 of German military deaths were killed off by the Red Army during WW2. The credible estimates of Russian military deaths range from around over 8,000,000 to as high as 10,700,000. Overall the exchange ratio during WW2 was 2.2 to 2.8 Russian military deaths for every German military death. A large percentage approx 40% to 30% of Russian military deaths during WW2 was when they were POWs in German military custody during WW2. Some 600 Werhmacht/Waffen SS/Luftwaffee Field Divs were destroyed by the Red Army during WW2. Some 70+ German Divs were destroyed by the Western Allies in 1944/45.
Could Russia destroy 600+ German Divs without Western Allied (mainly US) direct material aid & Bomber Raids that curtailed German war production. Quite probably not, it possible that the USSR would have surrendred or negoiated a seperate peace. If there was say 3 or 4 more Pz Divs, 15 or so more Volksgreandier Divs, 15 or 20 more fighter gruppen with triple the quantities of available Arty mutions & POL in 1944 in France not around Normandy during D day. The outcome may have been materially different.
Funny how they keep saying weather won the war for Soviet Union or Russians armies do so much planning and they can't think of the season of the year lol I'm sure weather did its little part but over all it's not a big factor at least should not be for the army of any kind otherwise what were they doing there to begin with
Just my opinion
Pretty much don't need to keep saying weather is the only thing that helped the red army otherwise I like this documentary so far
You guys lost. And we won. Before, now and forever. Accept.
You dont invade Russia. Ask Napolean
It does work, ask genghis khan
Ask tsar Alexander in WWI
Ask the Mongols and the Poles
“He hated communism,” as he established a different form of it(it’s the national SOCIALIST party, he’s a man of the left…a lot of ppl forget that)
Oh look... 🇺🇦 is in 🇷🇺....
So many mistakes,embarrassing 🤮