⚠️ Inverse of 5x5 matrix: but not using determinants! ✅

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 22

  • @juanmolinas
    @juanmolinas 4 года назад +7

    Hallo David!, the voice and music are too inspirate to discover maths... hug from Paraguay!

    • @tejedordealas
      @tejedordealas 3 года назад

      Saludos al gran Juan Molinas, apoyando a tope.

  • @ytxbesnupe
    @ytxbesnupe 2 года назад +2

    Learned this in engineering math. Forgot it since and now its popped up in my FEM class. Now I see why we were taught this. Very helpful!

  • @gabrielasantana3809
    @gabrielasantana3809 3 года назад +2

    I have a test coming up, and I have to say that you make math so relaxing jajaaja

  • @asbarker31
    @asbarker31 4 года назад +10

    I was never taught the determinant method to find inverses. I can see why, because the Gauss-Jordan is so much simpler and less error prone.

  • @jarogniewborkowski5284
    @jarogniewborkowski5284 4 года назад +6

    Cool movies You make 👌 I found Your channel already today 😲

  • @MuhammadAhmad-kr7zk
    @MuhammadAhmad-kr7zk 3 года назад +4

    Have an exam tomorrow, was finding ways to find 7*7 inverse ! THANK YOU SIR for making me put this appreciating comment ❤️ love

  • @TauroChuck
    @TauroChuck 2 года назад +2

    Appreciate you putting this out. Thanks a lot

  • @Mulkek
    @Mulkek 2 месяца назад +1

    Thanks, and explain so clearly!

  • @zombieguy759
    @zombieguy759 4 года назад +3

    I really love your videos, and I needed a favor. I need you to prove a bunch of things for me. I need you to prove the commutative property of addition for all real numbers, the multiplication of fractions, the addition of fractions, the commutative property of multiplication for all real numbers, and the distributive property for all real numbers including irrational numbers please. What I love about math is that it is always consistent and that properties are not made from thin air, and if you prove all these properties for me I will feel much better about that fact.
    Please I have searched in so many places and never found a satisfying answer. Please out of the kindness of your heart answer my questions

  • @acesovernines
    @acesovernines Год назад +1

    Superb lesson

  • @atambaasiimwe9618
    @atambaasiimwe9618 8 месяцев назад

    Brilliant explanation, thanks

  • @elenahaddad8749
    @elenahaddad8749 2 года назад +1

    Yh but this was quicker cz the matrix A is really close to the identity , try it with a matrix with no 0 entries and you will see it takes the same amount of time to row reduce it till the identity

  • @ethiopia11
    @ethiopia11 2 года назад +1

    thank you so much still helpful

  • @gunjansharma4789
    @gunjansharma4789 4 года назад +2

    At 2:03, Why have ve just multiplied the diagonal members to find out determinant. I thought it was only qpplicable when all the elements of matrix but diagonal elements are zero. But here a34 is not zero.?

    • @NicolayGiraldo
      @NicolayGiraldo 2 года назад

      It applies when the matrix is diagonal. All elements below the diagonal are zero, so it can be done.

  • @uwadiegwuemmanuel8809
    @uwadiegwuemmanuel8809 Год назад

    Thanks

  • @mostafaahmed-dg3yj
    @mostafaahmed-dg3yj 2 года назад +1

    thx a lot

  • @user-me4ti2os9b
    @user-me4ti2os9b 11 месяцев назад

    very good

  • @mamenjr5560
    @mamenjr5560 4 года назад +4

    👌

  • @socbramasole
    @socbramasole 4 года назад +3

    👏👏👏

  • @GfggfGgfyfgdd
    @GfggfGgfyfgdd Год назад

    مافيش ترجمه