God's Sovereignty !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!( Dr. James R White)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 окт 2024
- Renewed Mind is a TV Program that deals with the attraction that this world system has and its desire to conform us to its mould. Instead of ignoring the varied attacks against Holy Scripture, ‘Renewed Mind’ confronts any valid claim or accusation and demonstrates its error through godly speakers that are well equipped to deal with the topic being discussed. Its aim is to give clarity through the Gospel message by directing its viewers to the person of Jesus as Lord and Saviour. This program is brought to you by Christian Media Productions (CMP), a non-denominational and not-for-profit ministry whose pursuit is to proclaim the Good News of Jesus to all the World.
Dr. James White is the director of Alpha and Omega Ministries, a Christianapologetics organization based in Phoenix, Arizona. He is the author ofmore than twenty books, a professor, an accomplished debater, and an elderof the Phoenix Reformed Baptist Church.
![OhGeesy x Lefty Gunplay - What It Iz [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/L0yzW9t2ixk/mqdefault.jpg)
James White, a brilliant exposition ❤️
I really pray for DR Jay Smith, Dr David Wood Dr James White and all the Christian scholars out there and also all the preachers at the speakers corner for their hard work and for the burden they are carrying to spread the gospel of the Christ And delivering people from the bondage of the Satan.
I’m ex Muslim from Pakistan and I have accepted Jesus Christ my Lord and savior two years ago. After watching the videos and debates.
I pray from the bottom of my heart that God strengthen them with the holy spirt.
God bless them abundantly. Much love and respect✊❤️
I second your prayer in agreement for the men of GOD. Thank you for the testimony. May the Father bless you in Christ Jesus.
Dr James White is an amazing teacher. I learn so much from his teachings..thank you for all you do for God's Kingdom!
Actually, he's not an amazing teacher.
Lisa Hatfield he is indeed excellent!
@@BeGoodNow5 there's always some troll on here who loves constant controversy who has an unhealthy craving for drama and so you get in here and you bad mouth a man who teaches scripture. Just go do something better with your time
@@Thinking-Biblically Get a brain first before you address me, then we can have a discussion. The problem with you sheep, is that you follow blindly and bleep. So go ahead, worship at the shrine of your gods.
Thank you Lord for my brother James.
God bless you James White! Thank you for your well thought out explanation
Brothers, I recommend to read Exodus chapter 5-12 and Romans 9 to see how God is so marvelous, you will see and know His sovereign mercy.
This is amazing! Very consistent with the biblica truths. Thank God for faithful teachers like James White. May the Holy Spirit continue to empower you to live and proclaim Christ and his cruxifixion
Albert Agyemang AMEN
Very consistent
Ya and Yashua are the Greatest forever and ever!!
God is "...not willing that ANY should perish but that all should come to repentance."
2nd Peter 3:9
So Peter is here describing to us those that will be saved? He is arguing to prove that God doesn’t will all men ever created to perish? Why do any perish if it’s not Gods will? I think you should ask yourself, what purpose did Peter write 2nd Peter? What was his Goal or point, to the people he was writing to? That is the context of the epistle. Find the context then use that to exegete the passage.
Amen brother
Why am I a Christian? I have no idea! But thanks be to God…
James white is genius. I love the way he explains the sovereignty of God
Binyam Kidane He’s deceiving many and has no clue about BIBLICAL Sovereignty.
*He can’t just hi-Jack the definition of sovereignty and give it his own definition to fit his beliefs.
**Sovereignty does NOT mean determinism, it means GOD IS IN CONTROL and His ability to do whatever He wants.
Sovereignty is translated from “LORD, LORD” and is not even found once in the KJV!
(It’s only found in the ESV 3 times).
Reformers wrongly define the concept of divine sovereignty as meaning “meticulous deterministic control over ever thing, including the evil intentions of creatures.”
The scriptures simply never teach this concept.
Instead, divine sovereignty is reflected as God’s ability to do whatever He is pleased to do (Ps. 115:3)
even if that may include giving the world over to creature’s free dominion (Ps. 115:16).
Here’s the definition of sovereignty... should James White submit a new definition to Miriam Webster?
He can make up your own definition of sovereignty all day long but scripture won’t bend to it and the dictionary is not going to re-write itself on his behalf either.
************************************
MIRRIAM WEBSTER- SOVEREIGN
SOVEREIGN - noun
sov·er·eign | \ ˈsä-v(ə-)rən
1a: one possessing or held to possess supreme political power or sovereignty
b: one that exercises supreme authority within a limited sphere
c: an acknowledged leader : ARBITER
2: any of various gold coins of the United Kingdom
SOVEREIGN - adjective
1a: superlative in quality
b: of the most exalted kind : SUPREME sovereign virtue
c: having generalized curative powers
a sovereign remedy
d: of an unqualified nature : UNMITIGATED sovereign contempt
e: having undisputed ascendancy : PARAMOUNT
2a: possessed of supreme power a sovereign ruler
b: unlimited in extent : ABSOLUTE
c: enjoying autonomy : INDEPENDENT sovereign states
3: relating to, characteristic of, or befitting a supreme ruler : ROYAL
a sovereign right
God’s Word and the BIBLICAL DEFINITION of sovereignty will not bend to his lower view of His sovereignty.
God will not be put in a man made box.
Sovereignty= Supreme Power and Authority
God is definitely Sovereign by the BIBLICAL AND TRUE DEFINITION OF SOVEREIGNTY and not by man’s definition imposed upon it in order for it to suit a certain systematic.
God is in complete 100% control of everything.
That doesn’t mean He’s meticulously controlling everything.
God will filter everything and if He ever decides to let something happen deterministically of course He can as He has every right to but that’s definitely NOT the norm.
** Ask yourself, If God simply permits things to happen then what is it exactly that He’s permitting if everything is divinely controlled by Him according to your systematic???
In order for Him to permit something it actually AFFIRMS that man in fact does have a free will!
***********************************
Every time God answers a prayer He’s intervening
We clearly see God exercises His sovereignty by His decreed blessings and curses.
He intervenes when we humble ourselves and He intervenes when we harden ourselves.
God’s omniscience is FULL and COMPLETE in and of itself and is not dependant on Him needing to predetermine everything.
And He definitely doesn’t need us to tell Him He can’t be omniscient unless He does predetermine everything!
We’d then be limiting God to what we think He should be instead of just accepting and just resting in who He’s actually revealed Himself to be.
Wouldn’t we rather “expand” God by our opinion of Him?
A God who is STILL capable of being in control and still capable of working everything out for His good and His purpose DESPITE man’s freewill is a God that’s infinitely more powerful than a God who would not be able to do so.
Is it impossible for God to still be sovereign despite man’s freewill?
Definitely not.
How could anyone limit God in saying it’s not possible?
Those who do may have a very low view of God’s ultimate power.
What’s more impressive:
1. A God who has to play BOTH sides of a chess board in order for Him to win?
OR
2. A God who only needs to play one side of the chessboard and is STILL guranteed to win every time no matter what possibility comes His way.
Even with the fickleness of man’s infinite number of different decisions God is STILL in control and He can turn it to His good no matter what.
To me that’s a truly impressive God.
***********************************
God’s sovereignty means He is absolutely free to do whatever He pleases and whatever He wills to do.
Among the things He’s free to do is to allow me to do what I please within the confines of the freewill that He was pleased to give me.
Read that again slowly.
So when I make choices according to this freedom that God in His Sovereignty was pleased to give me, it actually FULFILLS God’s sovereignty not detracts from it.
God is most glorified when we act in accordance with what He’s decreed, and one of the things that God was pleased to decree was the freewill of man.
*********************************
So in an effort to deny that man has freewill is actually an attack on God and what’s He’s Sovereignly decreed.
It’s a rebellious act that refuses to accept and submit to God’s character and to what He’s Sovereignly decreed.
Such an act of rebellion actually DETRACTS from God’s glory, thus having the opposite effect that reformers intend by preaching against it.
It pleased God in His absolute Sovereignty and divine control to grant man free will.
************************************
... According to Psalm 115:3 God does whatever He pleases:
PSALM 115:3
3 But our God is in the heavens: HE HATH DONE WHATSOEVER HE HATH PLEASED.
** So we must then ask ourselves what has God done that’s pleased Him?
If we just KEEP READING in the very same chapter the author tells us exactly what it pleased God to do so we don’t have to assume we know:
PSALM 115:16
16 The heaven, even the heavens, are the Lord's: BUT THE EARTH HATH HE GIVEN TO THE CHILDREN OF MEN.
**IT PLEASED GOD TO GIVE MAN DOMINION.
************************************
God Sovereignly decreed not which choice man would make, BUT THAT HE WOULD BE FREE TO MAKE IT.
A God less than sovereign would be afraid to bestow genuine freedom to His creatures (*AW Tozer)
@@apilkey interesting but I’m still confused
@@E_Bautista Hi Elizabeth, what would you say are you most confused about specifically if you were to narrow it down?
Sovereignty, if respected by the governed (as opposed to a tyrant's sovereignty) requires the concept of responsibility. With that in mind, what responsibilities does God have? If he simply does as he wishes, then his sovereignty is a celestial tyranny.
@@alfrazz1799 I would echo the words of Paul in that "Who are you, O man, to speak back to God?" God is not bound by anything because He IS the standard by which all things are judged. He doesn't have an exterior set of rules to follow. Whatever He does IS good and righteous and holy by definition. Calling Him a celestial tyrant because He does all He pleases is utter blasphemy.
CHRISTIAN MEDIA PRODUCTIONS and James White, may i use this in my blog, for education purposes to teach the not yet sheep and the sheep so they may be established in the faith, Thanks for answering before you do it. I am Reformed to the core.
That was one of the best teachings on God's sovereignty and election and I needed to hear it again to sharpen my understanding when I'm awash in the doctrines of men who would have God be something that He is not. He is God and He always does ALL that He pleases. Thanks James, for the good word and to you as well, who's channel this is
Tom Savannah That’s funny because this was one of the worst teachings on God’s Sovereignty I’ve ever heard.
You can’t just hi-Jack the definition of sovereignty and give it our own definition to fit your beliefs.
**Sovereignty does NOT mean determinism, it means GOD IS IN CONTROL and His ability to do whatever He wants.
Sovereignty is translated from “LORD, LORD” and is not even found once in the KJV!
(It’s only found in the ESV 3 times).
Reformers wrongly define the concept of divine sovereignty as meaning “meticulous deterministic control over ever thing, including the evil intentions of creatures.”
The scriptures simply never teach this concept.
Instead, divine sovereignty is reflected as God’s ability to do whatever He is pleased to do (Ps. 115:3)
even if that may include giving the world over to creature’s free dominion (Ps. 115:16).
Here’s the definition of sovereignty would you like to submit a new definition to Miriam Webster?
You can make up your own definition of sovereignty all day long but scripture won’t bend to it and the dictionary is not going to re-write itself on your behalf either.
************************************
MIRRIAM WEBSTER- SOVEREIGN
SOVEREIGN - noun
sov·er·eign | \ ˈsä-v(ə-)rən
1a: one possessing or held to possess supreme political power or sovereignty
b: one that exercises supreme authority within a limited sphere
c: an acknowledged leader : ARBITER
2: any of various gold coins of the United Kingdom
SOVEREIGN - adjective
1a: superlative in quality
b: of the most exalted kind : SUPREME sovereign virtue
c: having generalized curative powers
a sovereign remedy
d: of an unqualified nature : UNMITIGATED sovereign contempt
e: having undisputed ascendancy : PARAMOUNT
2a: possessed of supreme power a sovereign ruler
b: unlimited in extent : ABSOLUTE
c: enjoying autonomy : INDEPENDENT sovereign states
3: relating to, characteristic of, or befitting a supreme ruler : ROYAL
a sovereign right
God’s Word and the BIBLICAL DEFINITION of sovereignty will not bend to your lower view of His sovereignty.
God will not be put in a man made box.
Sovereignty= Supreme Power and Authority
God is definitely sovereign by the BIBLICAL AND TRUE DEFINITION OF SOVEREIGNTY and not by man’s definition imposed upon it in order for it to suit a certain systematic.
God is in complete 100% control of everything.
That doesn’t mean He’s meticulously controlling everything.
God will filter everything and if He ever decides to let something happen deterministically of course He can as He has every right to but that’s definitely NOT the norm.
** Ask yourself, If God simply permits things to happen then what is it exactly that He’s permitting if everything is divinely controlled by Him according to your systematic???
In order for Him to permit something it actually AFFIRMS that man in fact does have a free will!
***********************************
Every time God answers a prayer He’s intervening
We clearly see God exercises His sovereignty by His decreed blessings and curses.
He intervenes when we humble ourselves and He intervenes when we harden ourselves.
God’s omniscience is FULL and COMPLETE in and of itself and is not dependant on Him needing to predetermine everything.
And He definitely doesn’t need us to tell Him He can’t be omniscient unless He does predetermine everything!
We’d then be limiting God to what we think He should be instead of just accepting and just resting in who He’s actually revealed Himself to be.
Wouldn’t we rather “expand” God by our opinion of Him?
A God who is STILL capable of being in control and still capable of working everything out for His good and His purpose DESPITE man’s freewill is a God that’s infinitely more powerful than a God who would not be able to do so.
Is it impossible for God to still be sovereign despite man’s freewill?
Definitely not.
How could anyone limit God in saying it’s not possible?
Those who do may have a very low view of God’s ultimate power.
What’s more impressive:
1. A God who has to play BOTH sides of a chess board in order for Him to win?
OR
2. A God who only needs to play one side of the chessboard and is STILL guranteed to win every time no matter what possibility comes His way.
Even with the fickleness of man’s infinite number of different decisions God is STILL in control and He can turn it to His good no matter what.
To me that’s a truly impressive God.
***********************************
God’s sovereignty means He is absolutely free to do whatever He pleases and whatever He wills to do.
Among the things He’s free to do is to allow me to do what I please within the confines of the freewill that He was pleased to give me.
Read that again slowly.
So when I make choices according to this freedom that God in His sovereignty was pleased to give me, it actually FULFILLS God’s sovereignty not detracts from it.
God is most glorified when we act in accordance with what He’s decreed, and one of the things that God was pleased to decree was the freewill of man.
*********************************
So in an effort to deny that man has freewill is actually an attack on God and what’s He’s sovereignly decreed.
It’s a rebellious act that refuses to accept and submit to God’s character and to what He’s sovereignly decreed.
Such an act of rebellion actually DETRACTS from God’s glory, thus having the opposite effect that reformers intend by preaching against it.
It pleased God in His absolute sovereignty and divine control to grant man free will.
************************************
... According to Psalm 115:3 God does whatever He pleases:
PSALM 115:3
3 But our God is in the heavens: HE HATH DONE WHATSOEVER HE HATH PLEASED.
** So we must then ask ourselves what has God done that’s pleased Him?
If we just KEEP READING in the very same chapter the author tells us exactly what it pleased God to do so we don’t have to assume we know:
PSALM 115:16
16 The heaven, even the heavens, are the Lord's: BUT THE EARTH HATH HE GIVEN TO THE CHILDREN OF MEN.
**IT PLEASED GOD TO GIVE MAN DOMINION.
************************************
God sovereignly decreed not which choice man would make, BUT THAT HE WOULD BE FREE TO MAKE IT.
A God less than sovereign would be afraid to bestow genuine freedom to His creatures (*AW Tozer)
@@apilkeyhow do you describe "meticulously controlling everything"?
Most of us who understand the English language would say that is 100% control of everything.
You somehow separated them and ascribe one to God while denying the other. Then you went on with your wordsalad interpretation using man's standards to develop your opinion.
The only reason nobody has replied is because you won't stick to simple responces, every comment will turn into a really long speech.
If God's control is not meticulous He cannot be 100% in control, whatever He isn't meticulously controlling would be a part of the 100%.
Try again to explain how that works.
@@ChristisLord2023 No, those who understand the English language would say that "meticulously controlling everything” = DETERMINING everything and controlling everything like a robot or puppet or marionette.
Anyone who understands the English language would recognizes a distinction between being in 100% control of everything vs. meticulously controlling everything.
And people who understand the English language, and also who understand Calvinism, know exactly what they mean when they say that.
And the definition of sovereignty isn’t word salad, nor is it somehow “man’s standards.”
We have definitions for a reason, you can’t just invent your own.
In order to understand the English language you need to know definitions which explains why you’re struggling so much.
🔴 YOU SAID: “If God's control is not meticulous He cannot be 100% in control.”
👉 REPLY: Um wrong. That’s just your fallen fleshly opinion based on feelings and nothing more.
@@apilkey so what are you claiming God isn't controlling?
@@ChristisLord2023 You’re still not getting it.
Stop using the word “controlling” and start using the phrase “in control.”
That’s what sovereignty is and that’s what’s being discussed.
God is in control of EVERYTHING.
There is absolutely nothing that God is not in control of.
Nothing is outside of His control.
Now again, being in control does not, has not, and never will mean controlling everything like the way Calvinists define it.
God doesn’t have to play both sides of the chess board in order to win the game.
He’s fully capable of STILL being in control despite the infinite number of fickle choices that man can make.
This is only possible with a truly powerful and omnipotent and sovereign God.
The Calvinist god would not be blue to do this as he is too weak and not powerful enough.
The only way a the Calvinist god can be in control is if he also meticulously controls everything i.e. determines everything.
The Basics:. "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved." (NOW!) Rejecters will not be. Why wouldn't the myriads of similar verses not say "those chosen to believe at creation will be saved"? Because it would be an accursed predestined different gospel! Those that do believe are predestined to be conformed to Christ's image. Believe and trust the Bible, not men
The sovereignty of God controversial - really? As the central plank upon which the Faith rests, the Lordship of God is not denied, but sadly, it is mostly impugned by men like Leighton Flowers, William Lane Craig, John Lennox, Frank Turek and all the other Autonomians who insist upon asserting the ‘sovereignty of man’ over the sovereignty of God…
What was God and what was He doing before He was sovereign? What are the implications when we consider His essential nature?
From eternity into eternity, doesn't mean much to you does it?
J W is consistently inconsistent with Scripture. But what can we do? God is in control!
Example?
Not enough space in comment to line up all the inconsistencies. Check Soteriology 101
@@frankthe2ndsonof1st16 Ah Soteriology101, talk about consistently inconsistent...
@@frankthe2ndsonof1st16the choice meats guy? That's hilarious.
To me it’s rather simple….God is fully sovereign but when he made man, He (God) chose to limit His sovereignty when He gave man the first spoken and written promises to distinguish Himself from all other god’s who man create who are “capricious”. Therefore God sovereignly created man with freewill to choose in receiving or rejecting His promises because it declares that “whatsoever a man soweth he shall also reap” good or bad. In this God does not violate His main attribute of Love over a fallen creation who is given the opportunity to redeem themselves to their creator.
That is a wonderful assertion that you made, but unfortunately you CANNOT give a single reference from ANYWHERE in Scripture that shows that God decided to "limit His sovereignty" to give man free will. What you CAN find is a plethora of places in Scripture that speak of God's complete sovereignty over His creation, even over the hearts of kings.
I love your passion in the title
"Sovereignty" and "will" need to be properly defined and understood. Sovereignty is "Supreme power and autonomy". That does NOT mean that it is always exercised or used down to the minutest detail, even though it could be. Will is "something that is desired or ordained". God is not willing that any should perish
You have to differentiate between prescriptive will and decretive will. We’re not saying he exercises his power to force everything that happens. He is permitting things all the time. But the fact that he could change it means he’s making a decision to allow it. And since every decision he makes is good, it follows that he has a good purpose for everything he allows or actuates. That’s what we mean by “ordain”.
He wishes that none should perish yet he created people that would. Obviously he has an overriding will.
U follow Jesus and still don’t believe him that his flash is real food
Still protesting
thank you for that instruction, brother!
I believe its goggyzo Greek for murmur
This is heresy
Said no Christian ever
@17:44 James states, “you can’t have two different groups here...”
Then @18:05 he states, “there are only two words between the two ‘hims’ in this text how do you insert that amount of theology in between just two words in the text?”
Isn’t it ironic that this is exactly what James and other reformers do with 2 CORINTHIANS 5:14
14 For the love of Christ constraineth us; because we thus judge, that if ONE DIED FOR ALL, THEN WERE ALL DEAD:
**Since we have to agree that ALL of humanity was dead in the second half of the verse then obviously He died for ALL in the first half of the verse
Or do reformers insert a whole bunch of theology in between just those couple words as well?
Hmm 🤔
It has to do with the context of 2 Corinthians. Paul is writing to believers on the ministry of reconciliation believers have to the lost world. All have died in their sins, including all that come to believe. If you continue on to verse 15 : "and he died for all, that those who live might no longer live for themselves but for him who for their sake died and was raised. " Notice he says "those who live". He doesn't say "all" who live. All humanity is dead in their sins and trespasses but only those for whom Christ dies, it is they that live. Galatians 2:20
Terrence Kuehn Christ died for everyone so your explanation is unbiblical.
It’s typical of reformers trying to explain away their inconsistencies.
Passages are constantly twisted and taken out of context so all only means all when YOU want it to mean all.
What if God DID really mean all?
How should God have worded it differently?
If God really did want to tell us that He died for ALL then how could He possibly ever communicate that to us?
Does your doctrine render it impossible for God to communicate to us that He did in fact die for ALL?
Have you rendered God an ineffective communicator?
Do you have any suggestions as to how God could re-write His word in order to communicate to you that He did in fact die for all?
What words should He have used instead to get His point across?
How many verses do you need to convince you?
10?
20?
30?
What’s the cutoff point where you would believe that He really died for ALL?
31 verses?
How about 32?
How many verses do you need to convince you that Christ did in fact die for everyone and that there’s a genuine offer of salvation to ANYONE and EVERYONE who believes?
What would it take to convince you?
If you’ve already determined in your heart that “all” does not really mean “ALL”, then there’s absolutely nothing God could say in His word to convince you.
100 verses wouldn’t convince you.
10,000 verses wouldn’t convince you!
If there’s absolutely nothing God could say in His word to clearly tell you that salvation is freely available to ALL who believe then scripture is NOT your authority.
A man-made doctrine is your authority.
Arminianism is heresy
Paul.E Tedder I agree and Calvinism is also heresy.
Good thing I reject both and just believe the BIBLE which supports neither of those two religions.
SOLA SCRIPTURA.
@@apilkey ah here you are...doesn't take long to find you lol😄
Will be debated 4ever
*until the Lord returns
possibly, unless we can get out of the dualism of man's will vs. God's sovereignty, instead of God's sovereignty and man's will.
not debated by those God actually chose. We know we could neevr choose God. our ego doesnt get in the way. Obvious.
"One will be taken, the other left."
obviously you only regard man becuase forever for god is a lot different He will not be argued with nor will he be told who "chose" him or who He "has" to accept. Hahahahaha
so stupid its so simple
Satan told Eve ; you can be good without God and be like God
same lie so called catholic pelagian arminians believe today
God gave 2 criteria of false preachers. “To the LAW and to the TESTIMONY: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is NO LIGHT in them.”-Isaiah 8:20KJV
1. What is the LAW? Obviously, the law of god written in the Bible.
2. What is the TESTIMONY?
“.. is the spirit of prophecy.”- Revelation 19:10KJV
TRUE PREACHERS are prophesied by God, they have the testimony of God about them.
Is Dr white prophesied by God? Does he have the TESTIMONY of God about him? If no, we should not believe him.
In my opinion the god described by the Calvinist bare closer resemblance to Allah than Yahweh
thats becuase you are too stupid to know anything about any of those things and you clearly have never believed the scriptures about what God said about himself.
ruclips.net/video/BlcdTm1BWXY/видео.html
Jesus said if I be raised up I will draw ALL men unto me. All means all, not the selected few as White claims. He's a reprobate who knows the true gospel, but rejects it. Stay away from this degenerate.
All KINDS of men surely?
God is indeed sovereign but not in Calvinistic way
you mean not in the biblical way?
acolytes777 calvanism is not biblical
@@albusai Seemed biblical to me....how many verses do you need>?
Matt how many verses do YOU need to know that Jesus really did die for ALL and that all really does mean all?
What if God DID really mean all?
How should God have worded it differently?
If God really did want to tell us that He died for ALL then how could He possibly ever communicate that to us?
Does your doctrine render it impossible for God to communicate to us that He did in fact die for ALL?
Have you rendered God an ineffective communicator?
Do you have any suggestions as to how God could re-write His word in order to communicate to you that He did in fact die for all?
What words should He have used instead to get His point across?
How many verses do you need to convince you?
10?
20?
30?
What’s the cutoff point where you would believe that He really died for ALL?
31 verses?
How about 32?
How many verses do you need to convince you that Christ did in fact die for everyone and that there’s a genuine offer of salvation to ANYONE and EVERYONE who believes?
What would it take to convince you?
If you’ve already determined in your heart that “all” does not really mean “ALL”, then there’s absolutely nothing God could say in His word to convince you.
100 verses wouldn’t convince you.
10,000 verses wouldn’t convince you!
If there’s absolutely nothing God could say in His word to clearly tell you that salvation is freely available to ALL who believe then scripture is NOT your authority.
A man-made doctrine is your authority.
@@apilkey psycho you copy and repaste same thing everywhere
Jesus = Offered to all
rejected by all
SO God made some for Himself
God regenerates draws seals sanctifies
Only hypocrite wackjob unbeliever man-justifyers would argue any of that
pelagianism and arminainism is not christianity it oppositionally rejects and denies the bible.
Whenever the word sovereign is mentioned turn away, it means a heretic Calvinist is talking.