Is Social Security Really at Risk? Trump’s Plans Explained | SSA, SSI, SSDI

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 ноя 2024

Комментарии •

  • @SupportGuideChannel
    @SupportGuideChannel  13 дней назад +2

    Hey everyone! 😊 If you're enjoying the content, don't forget to hit that subscribe button! It really helps the channel grow and keeps you updated with all the latest videos. Plus, drop a comment below-I’d love to hear your thoughts and chat with you all! Thanks for the support!

  • @CinemaKev24
    @CinemaKev24 12 дней назад +7

    Impliment the LONG overdue raise in payroll FICA and lift the cap on no SS taxed on earnings over $160k and payback the money congress stole from SS. Problem solved.

    • @SupportGuideChannel
      @SupportGuideChannel  12 дней назад +1

      You’ve hit on some solid solutions! Raising the payroll FICA rate and lifting the income cap so that earnings above $160,000 are taxed would significantly strengthen Social Security’s funding. And if Congress were to repay the borrowed funds, it could further stabilize the program. These changes could create a more sustainable system without burdening low-income retirees-simple adjustments that many believe are long overdue.

    • @CinemaKev24
      @CinemaKev24 12 дней назад

      @SupportGuideChannel Its not a difficult problem, just one that no party wants to deliver the solitions to younger workers, who will be around to vote much longer the 71m of us who will be around on this planet.

  • @brucefrohriep6060
    @brucefrohriep6060 12 дней назад +6

    Help the low income SSA NOW.

    • @SupportGuideChannel
      @SupportGuideChannel  12 дней назад +1

      Absolutely-many low-income Social Security recipients need more support now. Cost-of-living adjustments help, but they often fall short in covering essentials with today’s prices. Advocating for stronger support and targeted increases can make a real difference for those struggling to get by on limited benefits. It’s time to prioritize meaningful aid for those who rely on Social Security the most.

  • @erichoppe8228
    @erichoppe8228 12 дней назад +3

    Yeah! force the wealthy folks to pay their income taxes!!!

  • @gbdchannel2252
    @gbdchannel2252 12 дней назад +5

    New sources of funding will never include taxing billionaires.

    • @SupportGuideChannel
      @SupportGuideChannel  12 дней назад +2

      It often feels that way, doesn’t it? Despite frequent discussions about increasing taxes on the wealthiest individuals, new funding sources rarely seem to target billionaires directly. Instead, proposals tend to focus on broader measures that affect a wider base. This can be frustrating when it seems like those with the most resources often contribute the least to solutions for funding essential programs.

  • @BarbaraAnne-b2l
    @BarbaraAnne-b2l 12 дней назад +2

    Thanks for the info.

    • @SupportGuideChannel
      @SupportGuideChannel  12 дней назад +1

      You're very welcome! 😊 If you have more questions or need further details, feel free to reach out. I'm here to help. Take care!

  • @JamesOrth-o1v
    @JamesOrth-o1v 12 дней назад +2

    I'm skeptical, but I hope they are correct.

    • @SupportGuideChannel
      @SupportGuideChannel  12 дней назад +1

      It's totally understandable to be skeptical-there's a lot of uncertainty around changes to programs like Social Security. But hopefully, the plans and proposals will bring positive outcomes. Fingers crossed that they deliver the support that people truly need!

  • @maryehmke9349
    @maryehmke9349 11 дней назад

    Raise the payroll tax from 6.2 to 8.2, this will help tremendously for the people in the future.

  • @erichoppe8228
    @erichoppe8228 12 дней назад +3

    Since when did Trump concern himself about law and the US Constitution?

    • @edeymann
      @edeymann 12 дней назад

      Since 2016

    • @SupportGuideChannel
      @SupportGuideChannel  12 дней назад +1

      It's a common question, especially given some of the controversies surrounding Trump's time in office. Supporters argue that Trump prioritized American interests, sometimes challenging traditional interpretations of the Constitution to push his agenda. Critics, however, feel that he often tested legal limits, particularly with actions that raised constitutional questions, like his approach to executive orders and interactions with the judiciary. Ultimately, his presidency sparked a lot of debate about the balance between leadership and constitutional boundaries.

    • @erichoppe8228
      @erichoppe8228 11 дней назад

      @@edeymann He started thinking about America and Americans one week after NEVER! All he is concerned about is himself, and screw everyone else on the planet!

    • @edeymann
      @edeymann 11 дней назад

      @ Naa. If that was true he would have quit by now; everyone and their cousin trying to off him!

    • @erichoppe8228
      @erichoppe8228 11 дней назад

      @@edeymann Everyone who? His political enemies? You're deluded!

  • @ScottBrown-w1p
    @ScottBrown-w1p 12 дней назад +2

    Short answer... Good

  • @mariealviar4250
    @mariealviar4250 12 дней назад +1

    Make the rich pay their fair share of taxes. The middle class alone cannot sustain this. Why do we, middle class, have to pay more income taxes than the rich? Not only did I pay more during all the years I worked, I am still having to pay taxes now on my social security. Make this make sense.

    • @SupportGuideChannel
      @SupportGuideChannel  12 дней назад +1

      It’s frustrating, and many people feel the same way. While middle-class workers bear a significant tax burden, some wealthy individuals pay a lower effective tax rate due to loopholes and tax breaks. This creates an imbalance where middle-income earners end up shouldering a disproportionate share. And being taxed again on Social Security, after years of contributions, adds to the unfairness. There’s growing support for tax reforms to ensure those with the most resources contribute fairly-it’s about creating a system that truly makes sense for everyone.

  • @larryx314
    @larryx314 12 дней назад +3

    Take the cap off where people are taxed to help pay for s.s. and the dam problem is solved .

    • @maryehmke9349
      @maryehmke9349 11 дней назад

      They and raise the payroll tax from 6.2 to 8.2, this will help the people retiring in the future .

  • @cherrycarter5094
    @cherrycarter5094 10 дней назад

    Social security is not taxable

  • @jeanettecollazo9616
    @jeanettecollazo9616 11 дней назад

    It's going to be in Trump's pocket

    • @bobevans9996
      @bobevans9996 9 дней назад

      harris or trumpf - no one can affect china n world don't care
      indian harris german trumpf irish biden kenyan obama italian peloci ... all ok - just don't dare bring us nukes n starvation - china is nuke power china is supply power - we hire u to kiss xi - do u r job or u'll be jailed n u r money nationalized
      god made one adam one eve god made incest evil god
      abraham religions christian jew muslim r the only colonist criminals on earth ever - immigrate back home to origin - n hand over whole pacific n half atlantic like british hongkong n portuguese macau n american taiwan mideastern indonesia malaysia n spanish philipine n the americas newzealand australia also - u stole from the natives u stole from china because they came from china - world will reset
      religion - superstition is really bad
      jesus is just a jew who died horrible on the cross do u want to be like jesus
      buddha is just an indian who left palace for a tree do u want to be like buddha

  • @richardcorley364
    @richardcorley364 10 дней назад

    No is not safe

  • @erichoppe8228
    @erichoppe8228 12 дней назад +2

    Well I don't suppose that Vladamir Putin (you know, DJTrumpskys mentor) gives two hoots about
    political consensus or what the hell the citizens think about decisions that he makes!!