I thought they were going to debunk some EV myths? They didn't debunk nothing. Was going to listen to what they had to say. They are fast and have tremendous low end torque. That's not the reason why they will have issues with being as popular as combustion engines and hybrids. It's the infrastructure that I don't believe will be able to support them getting too popular. That's why I think Hybrids are the way of the future. Combining both of the technologies to get the best of both wolds. In order for EV's to have an effective infrastructure to be as popular as combustion engines. They need to update pretty much 90 percent of the homes and buildings to be able to handle them charging. The grids can't handle the load. It will cause electricity prices to skyrocket. California is already rationing out electricity and water. Then it will cause more pollution because 90 percent on the global electricity is ran off Petroleum or coal. EV's will use them to charge. So would need to change the world's electrical grid. That won't happen in the next ten years and will tale a long time in the US because everyone is in a depression.
The rest of the world, US included, is rapidly shifting to renewable energy. And California was rationing electricity over 15 years ago, too, it's nothing new. It's what happens when you build a massive sprawling metropolis in a desert. Same goes for water.
@gymkhanadog Go look up their hidden fresh water supply. They lie about their water supply being short. They jist look for ways to find to tax people. It's very rare that something that comes out of a politicians mouth that would be truly green. That would help both waste and other things that pollute the air. They are more concerned most of the time about who will line thier pockets. I do agree we need to look for alternatives. The issue is they have all positives for what they are trying to preach and when someone points out a weakness they crush that person. Don't matter what political party that person supports. More then likely though that person would probably be an Independent.
@gymkhanadog I think nuclear energy is the most stable. Way more stable than electrical grids ran off Petroleum or Solar. I really like solar panels for other reasons. It gives the customers the choice to choose their electricity supplier and makes them compete instead of one company completely running one system. It will drive the cost down. However, nuclear energy is more reliable in pretty much any situation. I just don't like it in areas with major hazardous regions. The reason is the possibility of a nuclear meltdown. So I don't see this as a reliable source in hurricane and tsunami regions. But places that get weak hurricanes and don't have many risks I think it's a good energy souce. I think it would also be smart to build these energy sources outside the cities and have a certain area of space they can't build around the facility. I also forgot to mention solar panels batteries don't do well in temperate climates. Anything too hot or cold needs Nuclear energy. I would bring in hydroplants. But they consume too much water or need ability water source with a fast moving river.
EV's and the like may be the future but it's certainly not a product ready for mass market appeal. A friend has a broken Hyundai Ioniq HEV 2017 with 60,000 miles on the odometer. Car needs a new HPCU (battery) $12,000 It's not as tho she can shop around as there are few technicians trained to work on these systems. Your unwittingly unpaid beta testers when you purchase non ICE vehicles
Myths: they're " green", ..they charge fast, ...range matches manufacturer's promises ...easy to work on ... batteries are long lasting ...batteries don't explode/ burn ...hold their value/ good investment ...They're selling like hotcakes
They do charge fast in the context of the battery size. Problem is, battery capacities have been marching ever towards for more range. Nobody ever said batteries don't explode or burn. They are fairly long lasting and can now be about 70-80% recycled. And yes, they are selling like hotcakes. Touch grass on occasion and you'll see EVs almost everywhere, or hybrids at the very least.
They do charge fast in the context of the battery size. Problem is, battery capacities have been marching ever towards for more range. Nobody ever said batteries don't explode or burn. They are fairly long lasting and can now be about 70-80% recycled. And yes, they are selling like hotcakes. Touch grass on occasion and you'll see EVs almost everywhere, or hybrids at the very least.
![Minecraft but Players Can Upgrade [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QRRgLJs4ZPk/mqdefault.jpg)
❤ thank you Stella for sharing with us , i love tecn😊
I thought they were going to debunk some EV myths? They didn't debunk nothing. Was going to listen to what they had to say. They are fast and have tremendous low end torque. That's not the reason why they will have issues with being as popular as combustion engines and hybrids. It's the infrastructure that I don't believe will be able to support them getting too popular. That's why I think Hybrids are the way of the future. Combining both of the technologies to get the best of both wolds. In order for EV's to have an effective infrastructure to be as popular as combustion engines. They need to update pretty much 90 percent of the homes and buildings to be able to handle them charging. The grids can't handle the load. It will cause electricity prices to skyrocket. California is already rationing out electricity and water. Then it will cause more pollution because 90 percent on the global electricity is ran off Petroleum or coal. EV's will use them to charge. So would need to change the world's electrical grid. That won't happen in the next ten years and will tale a long time in the US because everyone is in a depression.
Bev are not the future.
The rest of the world, US included, is rapidly shifting to renewable energy. And California was rationing electricity over 15 years ago, too, it's nothing new. It's what happens when you build a massive sprawling metropolis in a desert. Same goes for water.
@gymkhanadog Go look up their hidden fresh water supply. They lie about their water supply being short. They jist look for ways to find to tax people. It's very rare that something that comes out of a politicians mouth that would be truly green. That would help both waste and other things that pollute the air. They are more concerned most of the time about who will line thier pockets. I do agree we need to look for alternatives. The issue is they have all positives for what they are trying to preach and when someone points out a weakness they crush that person. Don't matter what political party that person supports. More then likely though that person would probably be an Independent.
@gymkhanadog I think nuclear energy is the most stable. Way more stable than electrical grids ran off Petroleum or Solar. I really like solar panels for other reasons. It gives the customers the choice to choose their electricity supplier and makes them compete instead of one company completely running one system. It will drive the cost down. However, nuclear energy is more reliable in pretty much any situation. I just don't like it in areas with major hazardous regions. The reason is the possibility of a nuclear meltdown. So I don't see this as a reliable source in hurricane and tsunami regions. But places that get weak hurricanes and don't have many risks I think it's a good energy souce. I think it would also be smart to build these energy sources outside the cities and have a certain area of space they can't build around the facility. I also forgot to mention solar panels batteries don't do well in temperate climates. Anything too hot or cold needs Nuclear energy. I would bring in hydroplants. But they consume too much water or need ability water source with a fast moving river.
EV's and the like may be the future but it's certainly not a product ready for mass market appeal.
A friend has a broken Hyundai Ioniq HEV 2017 with 60,000 miles on the odometer.
Car needs a new HPCU (battery) $12,000
It's not as tho she can shop around as there are few technicians trained to work on these systems.
Your unwittingly unpaid beta testers when you purchase non ICE vehicles
Myths: they're " green",
..they charge fast,
...range matches manufacturer's promises
...easy to work on
... batteries are long lasting
...batteries don't explode/ burn
...hold their value/ good investment
...They're selling like hotcakes
Don't forget the infrastructure.
@@paulfeasal6024 I knew someone would fill in the blanks( below).
They do charge fast in the context of the battery size. Problem is, battery capacities have been marching ever towards for more range. Nobody ever said batteries don't explode or burn. They are fairly long lasting and can now be about 70-80% recycled. And yes, they are selling like hotcakes. Touch grass on occasion and you'll see EVs almost everywhere, or hybrids at the very least.
They do charge fast in the context of the battery size. Problem is, battery capacities have been marching ever towards for more range. Nobody ever said batteries don't explode or burn. They are fairly long lasting and can now be about 70-80% recycled. And yes, they are selling like hotcakes. Touch grass on occasion and you'll see EVs almost everywhere, or hybrids at the very least.
@gymkhanadog using facts don't usually work for EV haters that selectively get their news from the catheter network, you are wasting your time.