I'm now working on studying for the Japanese language teaching competency test. Now I actually understand what Cooperative Principle means. Very helpful.
Jurij Fedorov for starters, every introduction to pragmatics or linguistics in general should suffice. If you want the bare original, try to dig up Grice's works: Grice, H.P. (1975). "Logic and Conversation," Syntax and Semantics, vol.3 edited by P. Cole and J. Morgan, Academic Press. Reprinted as ch.2 of Grice 1989, 22-40.
Thank you. I am not to used to answers on youtube that don't include words like "you are retarded", "you need to find a new brain". This was actually very helpfull. I love logic! www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/studypacks/Grice-Logic.pdf
I know the author's full name, but I guess I can't give it to you if he didn't do it himself... well, just cite the RUclips user "Phloneme" as the author (he's a student from Germany).
Ja, ich war in Brocks Linguistikvorlesung und in deinem Tutorium dazu (WiSe 2013/14). Ich hab die Prüfung mit 1,0 bestanden, danke für den guten Unterricht! :D
mach deinen Gesprächsbeitrag jeweils so, wie es von dem aktzeptierten Zweck oder der aktzeptierten Richtung des Gesprächs, an dem du teilnimmst, gerade
I like the video, and the explanation, but I don't fully agree with the cooperative principle. For example your Asian boss might violate the relation maxim (but you could also call this an opt out), because he isn't interested in talking about you, but he likes to talk about himself instead and likes to 'show off' that he is the leader/boss. And because he is your boss, and you respect him, you shut your mouth, and listen to him, because people tend to give much more value to status in Asian countries. I hope I made myself clear. Another problem might occur when two people from different cultures talk with each other. If an Englishman says "That is interesting" it could in reality mean "That is completly bullshit". But people from different cultures generally speaking don't know this, so assume that the listener is really interested.
Violation means that participants don't abide by the maxims of conversation: If you lie, you violate the maxim of quality, if you mess up and say something really awkward, you violate the maxim of manner. In general, the cooperative principle and the flow of successful communication gets impaired. Now, flouting is a special kind of violation where you violate the maxim but you do it intentionally and in such a way that it is obvious you're violating it. In a way, you communicate by flouting a maxim, but you also communicate a bit more, depending on what exactly you do. This "a bit more" is what is called implicature. In my opinion, a good example for flouting is sarcasm, because sarcastic things are often the opposite of what you mean (quality maxim violated), but sarcasm often works with the polar opposite of what is meant, and this huge difference in meaning is what makes it obvious. The implicature of sarcasm would be to communicate that the previous utterance was in some way unfitting or idiotic. Hope that helps. :)
I do not like the last sentence 'Now You knwo how to comunicate in the correct way'... By flouting or violating these maxims the conversation starts to be interesting and 'salted' :)
Als Violation bezeichnet man einen einfachen Maximenbruch, sowohl beabsichtigt als auch unbeabsichtigt. Flouting ist ein Sonderfall des Maximenbruchs, denn hier wird mit dem scheinbaren Nicht-Einhalten einer Maxime eine Implikatur ausgelöst. Das funktioniert, weil beide Gesprächspartner miteinander kooperieren und diesen anscheinenden Regelbruch als sinnhaltig deuten.
Sorry about that. The problem is that it's difficult to get out of this reading mode when you've got a script. Well, this video is almost 4 years old, so if you've got a video suggestion, I could try to make one in a more natural voice.
![PHILOSOPHY - Language: Conventional Implicature [HD]](/img/1.gif)
great explanation better than my teacher and the book itself ! thank you so much
Thank you for making this video. I could understand the principle easily! Concise, simple, and brilliant!
I'm now working on studying for the Japanese language teaching competency test. Now I actually understand what Cooperative Principle means. Very helpful.
This was so helpful for my forensics linguistics test! Thank you :)
I love the examples, and explanation is great! Thank U!!
Really useful for my course, look forward to seeing more. Thanks!
awesome explanation! Very clear and engaging. Thank you!
My mum! She's in your video! She really does like sandwiches.
Ben Dover Ms Llama's esteemed son is watching my videos. What an honour! ;)
Great explanation and superb examples, thanks!
The rage memes really sell it thanks!!!
Thanks for your brilliant work, keep it up.
Such a great explanation
I really loved it
It helped well
thank you, that is help me in discourse analysis
This was perfect!
Finally i found a proper video, thank youu!
this one's actually in the making :)
Thank you so much, I need this for our research. :)
I REALLY NEEDED THIS VIDEO THANK YOUUUU
Perfect explaination
So simple and useful! Thank you
Your examples are funny 😂😂😍😍. Helpful anyway 😇
Thank you really great explanation
This video so helpful for me to do the test. Thank you so much
This is easier to understand, thx.
Thanks alot it's so useful and l love it.❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
excellent thank you man keep going
Yeah... good job. Where can I read more about this?
Jurij Fedorov
for starters, every introduction to pragmatics or linguistics in general should suffice.
If you want the bare original, try to dig up Grice's works:
Grice, H.P. (1975). "Logic and Conversation," Syntax and Semantics, vol.3 edited by P. Cole and J. Morgan, Academic Press. Reprinted as ch.2 of Grice 1989, 22-40.
Thank you. I am not to used to answers on youtube that don't include words like "you are retarded", "you need to find a new brain". This was actually very helpfull. I love logic!
www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/studypacks/Grice-Logic.pdf
Love this, thanks! :D
More tutorial on Linguistics please
thanx for such education
That is useful for my presentation! but how can i cite this? who is the author??
I know the author's full name, but I guess I can't give it to you if he didn't do it himself... well, just cite the RUclips user "Phloneme" as the author (he's a student from Germany).
civsation Goodness me, you know me?! :D
Ja, ich war in Brocks Linguistikvorlesung und in deinem Tutorium dazu (WiSe 2013/14). Ich hab die Prüfung mit 1,0 bestanden, danke für den guten Unterricht! :D
Da gibt's zu viele bei mir im Kurs die 1,0 hatten, da kann ich ja ewig raten :D
Hmm I didn't quite understand the "flouting example"
hello . can you please recommand some references to read concerning the cooperative principles .
"de Linguist Llama" : D
mach deinen Gesprächsbeitrag jeweils so, wie es von dem aktzeptierten Zweck oder der aktzeptierten Richtung des Gesprächs, an dem du teilnimmst, gerade
Clearly explained
Hi, I want to ask a little question. How can we know that speaker had did violation of maxim?
What is a flouting exactly ?
How to distinguish between violating and flouting maxims in the answers ?
I like the video, and the explanation, but I don't fully agree with the cooperative principle. For example your Asian boss might violate the relation maxim (but you could also call this an opt out), because he isn't interested in talking about you, but he likes to talk about himself instead and likes to 'show off' that he is the leader/boss. And because he is your boss, and you respect him, you shut your mouth, and listen to him, because people tend to give much more value to status in Asian countries.
I hope I made myself clear.
Another problem might occur when two people from different cultures talk with each other. If an Englishman says "That is interesting" it could in reality mean "That is completly bullshit". But people from different cultures generally speaking don't know this, so assume that the listener is really interested.
You're welcome :)
thnks for you help plz i want some help in understanding the difference between violating and flouting
Violation means that participants don't abide by the maxims of conversation: If you lie, you violate the maxim of quality, if you mess up and say something really awkward, you violate the maxim of manner. In general, the cooperative principle and the flow of successful communication gets impaired.
Now, flouting is a special kind of violation where you violate the maxim but you do it intentionally and in such a way that it is obvious you're violating it. In a way, you communicate by flouting a maxim, but you also communicate a bit more, depending on what exactly you do. This "a bit more" is what is called implicature. In my opinion, a good example for flouting is sarcasm, because sarcastic things are often the opposite of what you mean (quality maxim violated), but sarcasm often works with the polar opposite of what is meant, and this huge difference in meaning is what makes it obvious. The implicature of sarcasm would be to communicate that the previous utterance was in some way unfitting or idiotic.
Hope that helps. :)
I do not like the last sentence 'Now You knwo how to comunicate in the correct way'...
By flouting or violating these maxims the conversation starts to be interesting and 'salted' :)
Gosh, everyone's a critic...
Yeah, this is a critic. But a statement. That's how to start a discussion
Was ist denn der Unterschied zwischen Violation und Flouting ? 😪
Als Violation bezeichnet man einen einfachen Maximenbruch, sowohl beabsichtigt als auch unbeabsichtigt. Flouting ist ein Sonderfall des Maximenbruchs, denn hier wird mit dem scheinbaren Nicht-Einhalten einer Maxime eine Implikatur ausgelöst. Das funktioniert, weil beide Gesprächspartner miteinander kooperieren und diesen anscheinenden Regelbruch als sinnhaltig deuten.
Is it possible to flout all four of the maxims?
Mika Laprebendere yes it is. Look out for Jenny Thomas' book. She goes into detail on how to flout all four maxims.
@@kaktees could please tell us the complete book name?
thnx😊😊😍😍👌👌👌
How I love your diction 😍
So funny xD
Very good explanation, but the voice is very off-putting
Sorry about that. The problem is that it's difficult to get out of this reading mode when you've got a script. Well, this video is almost 4 years old, so if you've got a video suggestion, I could try to make one in a more natural voice.
Creepy voice :s