2016 / 2017 GMC Yukon Denali XL Review (also covers Tahoe & Suburban) in 4K UHD!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 дек 2024

Комментарии • 201

  • @sumeetstyg7863
    @sumeetstyg7863 Год назад +1

    This guy might have the best review of this vehicle I haver ever seen. Props.

  • @mdaddya
    @mdaddya 8 лет назад +6

    I like this guy. He's very thorough and articulate without seeming long winded. And no stupid music selection...minus the hokey ending. Edit!

  • @benniewalker312
    @benniewalker312 7 лет назад +4

    My goodness that was one of the best informed and presented reviews I have ever seen. Love the comparisons of similar vehicles in the segment. Very well done

  • @Manhattan_
    @Manhattan_ 6 лет назад +1

    My parents finally upgraded from a 2001 Tahoe lt to a 2016 suburban ltz and we love it. ❤️

  • @Mithotyn444
    @Mithotyn444 8 лет назад +13

    Love the increasing refinement on these reviews!

  • @plantpoweredcertifiednutri6740
    @plantpoweredcertifiednutri6740 6 месяцев назад +1

    I own a 2017 GMC Denali XL. Best ride ever.🙌

  • @lachlanmiller28
    @lachlanmiller28 7 лет назад +1

    One of the most comprehensive reviewers, keep it up!

  • @AerisNL
    @AerisNL 8 лет назад +3

    Alex! What a fantastic review! Incredibly detailed, super thorough, and absolutely unbiased. The on screen numbers, and the comparisons with the competitors are very helpful! It definitely helped us with selecting our next vehicle. Subscribed!

  • @moviesmetalmusicmotorvehic4828
    @moviesmetalmusicmotorvehic4828 7 лет назад +8

    The GMC Yukon XL Denali is definitely the body on frame SUV I will pick over any other one.

    • @rumynchik
      @rumynchik 7 лет назад +1

      Escalade is better, if you have the money.

    • @thecoolguy775
      @thecoolguy775 7 лет назад +2

      Lucian nahhh it's seen as more luxurious but the Denali has a better exterior imo. It also doesn't have those stupid touch buttons for the dash

    • @rumynchik
      @rumynchik 7 лет назад

      I'll agree with the exterior for rear only and touch buttons. I like the seats and front better in the Escalade.

    • @thecoolguy775
      @thecoolguy775 7 лет назад +2

      Lucian seats are arguable but idk I find the Yukon to be more simplistic. I was going to buy the platinum Escalade bust customer service from the dealer in my city, Abu Dhabi, is just horrible.the 2 reasons I mentioned before also swayed me to buy the Yukon instead

    • @moviesmetalmusicmotorvehic4828
      @moviesmetalmusicmotorvehic4828 7 лет назад +1

      AD M To me, the Yukon XL Denali is the best SUV. Period. No SUV will ever top it IMO.

  • @wesrazz5874
    @wesrazz5874 8 лет назад +48

    This guy is the best! These tanks need a diesel engine for better mpg.

    • @timkaczmarowski8151
      @timkaczmarowski8151 5 лет назад +1

      In the market for one of these esp after seeing the pathetic mpg of a toyota seqouia of 13/17, these i believe are 15/22 which is better than the previous gen that i currently have

  • @Ward413
    @Ward413 8 лет назад +3

    It's so weird watching your videos man. I know every road you're on. In this video is was Summit road and then Highland Way through Corralitos - the narrow road that leads to Watsonville. In your other videos I've seen you on Skyline and HWY9. I was born in Santa Cruz and grew up in San Jose so I know that area really well. I drove these roads every weekend for ten years. A sunny day cruise through any of those roads with a decent handling car is one of my favorite things but even in a Suburban it's fun. I enjoy your videos. Keep it up.

  • @bighousefan2223
    @bighousefan2223 7 лет назад +6

    Damn good review and breakdown of similar vehicles! Thank you, I went with the Denali (not the XL version), and am loving it very much!

  • @LETSWIM1
    @LETSWIM1 8 лет назад +2

    16 overall MPG for this large, 4WD, V8 SUV is very good. I have a 2005 Toyota 4Runner 2WD V6, and the medium-size SUV only gets 17 overall MPG.

  • @larryrichmond
    @larryrichmond 8 лет назад +3

    Great video! I love the new green screen comparison segment. Keep up the great work!

  • @hellodlo
    @hellodlo 8 лет назад +2

    like the new black screen when comparing its competition, it's a lot easier to follow; great review!

  • @sjewkes1
    @sjewkes1 6 лет назад +2

    Fantastically detailed as always, but would love to see an updated 2018 review with the new 10-speed transmission seen in the new Expedition.

  • @v1nacious
    @v1nacious 8 лет назад +1

    Hey Alex. You're one of the most detailed, yet straightforward reviewers I've found on RUclips. However, you don't seem to say much (or anything at all) about the vehicles' parking functions. Like when you're on the rood, it'd be good if you could add some video on parking the vehicle as well. That way, we can determine if the various functions available adhere to our needs. Truly appreciate your videos. I'm still determining which SUV/Crossover/Truck is for me. Peace!

  • @zachbattack
    @zachbattack 8 лет назад +1

    The rear passenger door can tell you much better than the window if you look near the wheel well and the door bends around it (like the thumbnail) it is the short one. But if the wheel well is separated by an inch or two(like this car) it shows if it is thr long or short version.

  • @M1911jln
    @M1911jln 8 лет назад +1

    I spent several days driving a Durango last year. I found that visibility was just terrible. The a-pillars are very thick and combine with the mirrors to make it easy to miss a pedestrian. But the biggest problem I had was that the overhead console pushes the rear view mirror down so low that it was directly in my line of sight, creating a huge blind spot towards my right.
    I'm used to driving a large SUV (I drive a 200 Series Land Cruiser), but I have to say that the visibility on the Durango was such that I would not own one.

  • @DBLA
    @DBLA 8 лет назад +2

    I think I would safely skip the Denali model if I were ever in the market for a GMC. Compared to the non-Denali models, it still doesn't impress me enough. Still a very nice vehicles you tested.

  • @himmura
    @himmura 6 лет назад +2

    Great review as always. Thanks for doing what you do.

  • @4fastdrs
    @4fastdrs 8 лет назад +1

    Way to go Alex fair and balanced reporting. I personally would go for the Escalade but I work for Cadillac so... that being said I still think the Grand Jeep Cherokee, and Ram 1500 are excellent vehicle's so I'm not completely clouded in my judgment.

  • @jaffarbaqi
    @jaffarbaqi 8 лет назад

    Thank you. As usual, your review is thorough and informative.
    I would only add/adjust two points; the ride gets a (C), and the third raw is really useful for not more than a 10 min ride, even for small people.
    Thanks again.

  • @coureurdebois
    @coureurdebois 8 лет назад +5

    higher quality than the navigator better looking than the Tahoe and expedition and you get Magnetic ride + nappa leather and lots of brushed aluminum. but its by no means is it in the realm of the escalade not even close, the escalade has its own higher quality switch gear, more sound dampening, and far more premium materials not to mention a 100% unique interior architecture. much like the audi Q7 vs the VW Touareg they share platforms but not interiors or tuning :).

  • @actthree34
    @actthree34 8 лет назад +15

    I got ride in a new Danali (the shorter wheelbase model) last weekend. The owner only had it for a month or so. Beautiful inside and as you pointed out, so quiet. The egg-crate grille is a little much but if I was running a car service, and I could match income to lease payments, I buy one tomorrow,

  • @daseteam
    @daseteam 8 лет назад +1

    Thanks Alex, love your thoroughness. Not always a given on North American tests.....

  • @Groszify
    @Groszify 8 лет назад

    You are the best, Alex. Love your video reviews. Trusted.

  • @bird271828
    @bird271828 8 лет назад +12

    15:20 Living room on wheels? LOL. I don't like SUV's. But Alex's reviews are so good that I watched the entire video. Thank you Alex :-)
    Oh, nice ending :-)

    • @gjonjuan5633
      @gjonjuan5633 6 лет назад +1

      Why are you here if you don't like suv's?

  • @MikeIsCanadian
    @MikeIsCanadian 8 лет назад

    I like the new comparison format.

  • @angelrbarajas
    @angelrbarajas 6 лет назад +3

    Please do 2018 Ford Expedition max vs 2018 GMC Yukon Denali XL! Please please please

  • @rkalla
    @rkalla 8 лет назад

    Liked the new comparison segment at the end!

  • @Boogs114
    @Boogs114 Год назад

    😊Im impressed. I currently drive a 2016 Rogue SL, I want my next SUV to be either this Yukon Denali OR an Infiniti QX80

  • @kipamore
    @kipamore 8 лет назад +1

    Love the new format tweaks. A on A shirt too! Tip: expressing fuel economy in city/highway actually tells me something, the combined really doesn't.

  • @racer0897
    @racer0897 8 лет назад +11

    It has a filing cabinet in it because it is so expensive that you will have to live in it.

  • @Jaykavadi
    @Jaykavadi 8 лет назад

    Brilliant stuff as always ! Top notch content and the format as well

  • @Tully3674
    @Tully3674 8 лет назад

    Good review as always but (there's always a but :) what has been missing from your past few videos is a DEFINITIVE recommendation. You lay down the pros/cons but its good to hear a recommendation based on your driving experience.

    • @2004cyrus
      @2004cyrus 8 лет назад

      Sometimes he says which vehicle he would purchase.

  • @joachimlotz5049
    @joachimlotz5049 8 лет назад +1

    alex...i think more comfort is the most reason to buy yourself a yukon xl/suburban/escalade esv😄😎

  • @kaleidoscopeon
    @kaleidoscopeon 8 лет назад +41

    Impressive car but finding a parking for this huge thing is a chore.

    • @mhassouneh
      @mhassouneh 3 года назад +1

      @Parker Gray True, but you gotta admit that you need to choose parking spots, like ones that are a little bit farther away, and ones where the cars on each side aren't parked over the lines.

    • @tonymontana6734
      @tonymontana6734 2 года назад +2

      Park far away and leave the close parking for the women

    • @iverson2k10
      @iverson2k10 Год назад

      @@tonymontana6734well said! Lol

    • @JoseS-h6f
      @JoseS-h6f 8 месяцев назад

      I keep walking shoes to park away from everyone

  • @A_guan
    @A_guan 8 лет назад +3

    How's the leg and head room on the normal Wheelbase version for this?

  • @moshariff6320
    @moshariff6320 8 лет назад +64

    LOL Guys, STAY TILL THE VERY END. TRUST ME 😂😂😂

    • @moshariff6320
      @moshariff6320 8 лет назад +4

      And as always great review Alex!

    • @Mgoblagulkablong
      @Mgoblagulkablong 8 лет назад +4

      Thanks for traumatizing me.

    • @mjlanglois2
      @mjlanglois2 8 лет назад +5

      earn that money! :P

    • @leafqi
      @leafqi 7 лет назад +1

      That's why he often reminds me of Mr. Bean

    • @rxonmymind8362
      @rxonmymind8362 6 лет назад +2

      No.Just no. I can't erase that now. Thanks.😨

  • @swifg277
    @swifg277 8 лет назад +2

    did gm decide to ditch the 4 cyd duramax that they said would get 24mpg ?

  • @denvernuggets007
    @denvernuggets007 4 года назад +1

    Owned one and it’s not bad at all. 😃😃😃

  • @marinoint
    @marinoint 8 лет назад

    Can't wait to see your review on the 2017 GMC Arcadia Denali.

  • @Fernweh4x4andadventure
    @Fernweh4x4andadventure 5 лет назад

    I thought this review was excellent, really appreciated the detail you went to

  • @22358
    @22358 8 лет назад

    An excellent review! I like the detailed compare at the end

  • @EDHBlvd
    @EDHBlvd 8 лет назад +2

    Damn that is quick for 6000 lbs and 8 seats. Those file folder rails though....

  • @joankennnedy6835
    @joankennnedy6835 7 лет назад

    I love my Ford (easier to drive at home) ...but rented the GMC Yukon XL in Bangor, ME. ...a great way to tour the G babes around Acadia Nat. Park!

  • @mountainhobo
    @mountainhobo 8 лет назад +1

    4:02 "Fuel economy is obviously not going to be as high as your average Camry or Accord" -- I hate to say this, but it is not that far off. My 4 cyl Camry gets about 26 mpg average, and I do a fair number of highway miles in addition to regular suburban Silicon Valley commute. The question really is, how true are those numbers, because Toyota's numbers on the sticker are pure fantasy. Do you really get 17/18 average mpg on the Yukon, and 16 mpg on the Yukon XL, or is it also just a fantasy?

  • @bowmanjeff8
    @bowmanjeff8 4 года назад +1

    Ive read they still have the oil consumption issue . AFM :(

  • @tomeng9520
    @tomeng9520 7 лет назад

    Hi Alex on Autos ! You forgot to mention about buffeting and vibration.
    GMC Yukon Denali buffeting and vibration big time.
    A man noticed a shaking that he said “feels like driving on cobblestones,” at around 70-80 mph.
    Google it, people are pretty mad about it.

  • @NA-nf2vt
    @NA-nf2vt 8 лет назад +3

    Looking forward to a review on the Jaguar F-Pace and the Buick Envision. Please!

  • @JulezWinnfield
    @JulezWinnfield 8 лет назад

    Alex,
    Any plans for a higher trim (R/T or Citadel) 2016 Dodge Durango review? You always make such positive comparisons of the Durango with other comparable SUV's.

  • @britneyspeears8650
    @britneyspeears8650 8 лет назад +1

    Alex, you keep referring to this as the "long wheel base" but the Suburban and Tahoe have the same wheelbase, the difference in length is all in the body behind the rear wheel.

    • @AAutoBuyersGuide
      @AAutoBuyersGuide  8 лет назад +6

      Not quite, the Suburban/Yukon XL has a 130 inch wheelbase and the booty stretch, the Yukon/Tahoe rides on a 116 inch wheelbase

  • @AmanMarfatia
    @AmanMarfatia 7 лет назад +2

    Can you do review on Cadillac Escalade ESV Platinum trim level?
    -Thanks

  • @CrooklynPilot
    @CrooklynPilot 8 лет назад

    I really like your ending summary segment of your video. Very informative! However, I'd like to suggest that you change your black background to white. I think it would show better. I have seen other RUclipsrs use the white background for their product reviews and it looks clean. Just a thought!
    Have you considered reporting on popular used cars? I am considering buying a used Audi A4 wagon, there's very limited content on RUclips about certain older cars - including Audi A4 wagons. I think you'll do a great job providing a quick summary of the car dynamics, resell value, safety and reliability issues. Keep up the great work.

  • @ManMAVERICK
    @ManMAVERICK 8 лет назад

    You Sir!! are a terrific reviewer!! like a one stop shop!! :) good job!

  • @yayankee1
    @yayankee1 8 лет назад +1

    there is no banner for the infotainment system

  • @dukinygaming259
    @dukinygaming259 8 лет назад

    Amazing and extremely informative review. This may end up being my moms next vehicle. I've heard that the ride with the 22 inch wheels is harsh because they over inflate them from the factory.

  • @DKen2k
    @DKen2k 8 лет назад +3

    can you review the jaguar f pace next? im really loving that cars looks and would love to see your review on it.

  • @Theophilus138
    @Theophilus138 8 лет назад +1

    I'd like to hear about how the extended-length Expedition and Navigator compare to the extended GM SUVs for a real apples-to-apples comparison. When I watched the video it looked like you were only comparing the regular-length Expedition. Historically the Fords have been more spacious in the back due to the more compact independent rear suspension.

    • @jahnaycock
      @jahnaycock 8 лет назад

      EPA interior volume is no comparison
      Expedition EL/Navigator L: 210.9 cu.ft.
      Yukon XL/'Suburban/Escalade ESV: 122.4 cu.ft.

    • @AAutoBuyersGuide
      @AAutoBuyersGuide  8 лет назад

      +John Shaheen those numbers are not correct, Volume is a tricky measurement but 200+ cubic feet is what you see in extended body cargo vans, the expedition according to Ford is 130 behind the front seats with the other rows folded

    • @jahnaycock
      @jahnaycock 8 лет назад

      Those figures are per Edumonds: The space in the Ford's are significantly larger due to the IRS and the fact that the GM vehicles lost significant space behind 3rd row when they went to the fold flat 3rd row in current generation.
      www.edmunds.com/car-comparisons/?veh1=200734923|&veh2=200779876|suv&show=0&comparatorId=4540776

    • @AAutoBuyersGuide
      @AAutoBuyersGuide  8 лет назад

      I don't doubt the source of the numbers but it highlights the trouble with that particular spec. Cargo volume behind the first row seats is in theory correct on that page: 130 vs 122, but it's simply not possible for the Expedition to haver 70 cubic feet of space *in front* of the front seats, nor is it possible that the front seat area in the Yukon/Suburban/Tahoe is just 7/10ths of a cubic foot.

  • @nicologarcia
    @nicologarcia 8 лет назад +1

    Great videos, Alex. If you can, please do an Expedition EL EcoBoost. Thank you!

  • @alexs0082
    @alexs0082 8 лет назад +1

    Great review Alex!

  • @1122scape
    @1122scape 8 лет назад

    How does the Expedition's 3rd row legroom/comfort compare with the Yukon? The numbers seem to favor the Expedition but real world?

  • @k24hybrid
    @k24hybrid 8 лет назад +1

    very detailed reviews!!! excellent!!

  • @Tristann616
    @Tristann616 8 лет назад

    Great review as always! Alex, do you think you'll be doing the 2017 Acura MDX soon?

  • @lBugslBunny
    @lBugslBunny 7 лет назад

    Hey Alex have you reviewed the new Escalade yet? If not any plan on doing it? I'd really love to hear your opinion about it. Thx for the very informative and detailed review as always and keep it up :)

  • @robertmacdonald4518
    @robertmacdonald4518 5 месяцев назад

    Sorry took out a Durango R/T for family didn't buy it was nice, then took out Yukon Denali much more usable room by far and its wider that makes big difference. I got the 10 speed thats the one you want.

  • @bigbarn78
    @bigbarn78 8 лет назад

    I have a 2017 SLT version as a rental rental. Just wanna make sure what type of gas i use??
    Thanks

  • @CalebCissna
    @CalebCissna 8 лет назад

    What about the Lincoln Navigator? Same engine as Expedition , but uprated

  • @iennguyen1954
    @iennguyen1954 7 лет назад +2

    what's an spacious handsome looking car.the potential car in full size suv segment

  • @Puzzoozoo
    @Puzzoozoo 8 лет назад +1

    Be nice if all the You Tube car testers were as good as Alex.

  • @kensebben1
    @kensebben1 8 лет назад +7

    23:53 CONS: -Expensive -Expensive -Expensive, LOL

  • @angeljimenez2112
    @angeljimenez2112 8 лет назад +19

    haha! watched it to the very end!

    • @elliottmanning4116
      @elliottmanning4116 8 лет назад +3

      I was listening to this review while I was playing Angry Birds, and I thought I was just going to hear post review music and then I heard Pussycat Dolls. "Don't you wish your girlfriend was raw like me, don't you wish your girlfriend was fun like me."

    • @angeljimenez2112
      @angeljimenez2112 8 лет назад +1

      +Elliott Manning 😂🖒

  • @speedometerrepairguy6065
    @speedometerrepairguy6065 6 лет назад

    Has anyone else noticed the LED tail light issues?
    ...just adding to the cons: "Expensive-Expensive-Expensive!" LOL

  • @denvernuggets007
    @denvernuggets007 4 года назад

    Beautiful truck

  • @doomtomb3
    @doomtomb3 8 лет назад

    What exactly was the point of sitting in the cargo area ?

  • @markjohnsen1757
    @markjohnsen1757 7 лет назад

    Do a review of the Expedition platinum 4wd it's a very nice and impressively powerful suv for a 6 cylinder and I would like to hear your opinions

  • @willwinter6528
    @willwinter6528 5 лет назад

    Can they make digital.tail.light.
    Like where light go up..
    Like Knight Rider ??

  • @angeljimenez2112
    @angeljimenez2112 8 лет назад +1

    Alex. Did I see you on motorweek?

  • @exquisitecash8150
    @exquisitecash8150 4 месяца назад

    What banner I am trying to find the video of the infotainment center

  • @dirtykushlungs2566
    @dirtykushlungs2566 8 лет назад

    Can you look into doing a Cadillac xt5 platinum trim

  • @mountainhobo
    @mountainhobo 8 лет назад +1

    Alex, in the comparison you did not mention 2016 Cadillac Escalade ESV. Its price is not that far off from the Denali XL. How do they compare? What are the possible advantages of one over the other?

    • @AAutoBuyersGuide
      @AAutoBuyersGuide  8 лет назад +4

      Starting price yes, but the ESV gets fantastically expensive ...

    • @mountainhobo
      @mountainhobo 8 лет назад

      I guess I did not look at the options and assumed that for that price it comes well equipped.

    • @notthisguyagain8557
      @notthisguyagain8557 8 лет назад

      +Alex on Autos love to see you review a Porsche.

    • @weirdshibainu
      @weirdshibainu 8 лет назад

      esv escalade is right at 6 figures now

  • @vipul_singh
    @vipul_singh 8 лет назад

    Hey Alex! Please also review the Land Cruiser

  • @tyrice312
    @tyrice312 8 лет назад

    Where is the review of the GS 350 F sport??

  • @davishous1
    @davishous1 8 лет назад

    How easy is it to get to the spare tire?

  • @vettefreak89
    @vettefreak89 8 лет назад

    Alex what about the long wheelbase Expedition EL in comparison to the XL versions of the GM trio? Also wheels aside is there is huge difference to you on the GM suvs with the Magnetic Ride Control (Tahoe/Suburban LTZ, Yukon/Yukon XL, and Escalade/Escalade ESV) to the normal set up or even the set up offer on the Tahoe Z71?

    • @vettefreak89
      @vettefreak89 8 лет назад

      By the comparison between the Expedition and Tahoe/Suburban is the cargo space and the way space is used. I noticed that in the Expedition the short wheelbase has a little bit more room.

  • @DIRTDIVER882
    @DIRTDIVER882 6 лет назад

    I have the 2001 yukon xl slt 4x4 with the 5.3 ltr in it. I gotta give gm credit , they def got it right. However i wld love to see a diesel model. Also i dnt think my model has the 4 cylinder at highway speed option so im burning the hell outta that fuel. And that 33.5 gal tank is a killer with marylands $3.55 per gal prices. But that 4x4 will go just about any where.

  • @brandonso
    @brandonso 8 лет назад +18

    I wish my girlfriend was hot like Alex

  • @GRETOUZ
    @GRETOUZ 4 года назад

    8 Bags with 6 Seats? Is this right?

  • @erikyoo2835
    @erikyoo2835 8 лет назад

    can you review a Uhaul truck next?

  • @PKClanNet
    @PKClanNet 8 лет назад

    Annnnnnd, why did you not feature Suburban and Tahoe in the ending segment? PROS CONS..ect..

    • @PKClanNet
      @PKClanNet 8 лет назад

      Also if you like the Tahoe styling, you would like the Suburban, because they are the same?

  • @powerofpinesol8002
    @powerofpinesol8002 8 лет назад +1

    The price vs the actual quality is really bothering me as I want to like it but I still can't justify paying 80 thousand dollars for one I'll much rather have a Mercedes or Q7.. splashes of wood and a stitched portion of the upper door handle isn't quite enough as there is still hard plastics in touch points

  • @roneyraju4790
    @roneyraju4790 5 лет назад

    Good review

  • @songweiyu2865
    @songweiyu2865 7 лет назад +2

    I'm considering to get Nissan Armada or GMC Yukon

    • @thecoolguy775
      @thecoolguy775 7 лет назад +1

      SONGWEI YU yukon denali for sure

    • @ENEN54
      @ENEN54 7 лет назад

      SONGWEI YU me too🤔🤔

  • @matthewyim1736
    @matthewyim1736 8 лет назад

    Alex, do you think the Cadillac Escalade EXT is coming back after a few years of absence?

  • @portzeki3411
    @portzeki3411 6 лет назад

    Pretty awesome!

  • @SimonStrother
    @SimonStrother 7 лет назад

    This or a base Range Rover. Or a decently optioned RR Sport

  • @harryaxe5167
    @harryaxe5167 8 лет назад +1

    Fuel economy? where is the diesel?

  • @darrinsteinman1841
    @darrinsteinman1841 7 лет назад

    Saving my money for a new navigator

  • @sbblakey
    @sbblakey 8 лет назад +5

    Your Volvo XC90 annotation is out of place.