apt-get has a stable interface and output. apt should not be used in automations, only for interactive sessions. The output (and possibly the input) does not promise to stay the same between versions, and is more oriented around user-friendliness.
Thank you for sharing your insights. Both apt-get and apt have their strengths and the choice between them depends on the specific use case and requirements. For further details, you can explore the article provided in the video description.
Glad to know the video was informative for you. It's incredible how even after years of experience, we can still learn about new insights in the Linux world. If there is any topic you'd like to see covered, feel free to explore our channel and website.
Great video .. but you seem to be hyper focused on Ubuntu (based on Debian) Will you do some others vids on other lines of Linux - Debian, Arch, Gentoo, Fedora, Slackware, Open Suse'?
Thank you for your feedback and for watching the video! We are constantly working on various Linux-related content to cater to a broader audience. Feel free to explore our website: LinuxSimply and RUclips channel for diverse contents.
Thank you for sharing your experience. It’s great to hear that you are enjoying nala. It can be deemed as a cleaner alternative to apt. However it’s important to note that it may not run every apt command. If you have any specific thoughts or insights about nala that you'd like to share, feel free to let us know.
Thank you for these interesting explanations. I mainly use pacman, but it's interesting to know the differences between apt-get and apt. ** Merci pour ces intéressantes explications. J'utilise principalement pacman, mais il est intéressant de connaître les différences entre apt-get et apt.
Thank you for sharing your perspective. Considering the compatibility, apt-get can indeed be a good choice for scripts since it has been around for a long time. Stay tuned for more Linux-related content.
Thank you for sharing your perspective. Emergence of apt which is an improved version of apt-get reflects the adaptability of the Linux community. Stay tuned for more Linux-related videos.
If you have a good understanding of Linux package management, apt and apt-get are usually the preferred choices, particularly for Debian-based distributions. However, if you are new to Linux or require advanced dependency resolution, aptitude can be a great alternative that provides both command line and text-based interfaces.
Thank you for pointing that out. Apt is the recommended package tool. However, apt-get is used for older systems. We appreciate your input. Stay tuned!
Thank you for watching the video and sharing your thoughts. It's important to clarify that both package management tools have their own strengths and use cases. Apt is more user-friendly and supports newer version of Debian. On the other hand, apt-get is a preferred choice for older Debian versions and users who want in-depth package management control. To learn more about this topic, feel free to explore the article linked in the video description.
![How to Add Repository in Ubuntu? [2 Simple Methods] | LinuxSimply](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kSNOe9_irQ0/mqdefault.jpg)
![How to Add Repository in Ubuntu? [2 Simple Methods] | LinuxSimply](/img/tr.png)
![FNAF vs TF2 - Episode 2 [SFM]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/z5b3V2-VLb0/mqdefault.jpg)
Which one do you use: ’apt’ or ‘apt-get’, and why? Share your thoughts and personal insights with us in the comments below!👇
apt-get has a stable interface and output. apt should not be used in automations, only for interactive sessions. The output (and possibly the input) does not promise to stay the same between versions, and is more oriented around user-friendliness.
Thank you for sharing your insights. Both apt-get and apt have their strengths and the choice between them depends on the specific use case and requirements. For further details, you can explore the article provided in the video description.
Found the guy with the beard.
15 years into ubuntu, 3 years into building debian-based docker images and never knew there was a difference....
Glad to know the video was informative for you. It's incredible how even after years of experience, we can still learn about new insights in the Linux world. If there is any topic you'd like to see covered, feel free to explore our channel and website.
Tremendo tiempo desperdiciado entonces...si no sabes eso, no me imagino el resto.
Your videos are good and to the point. You really deserve more viewers/subscribers. Keep it up, I'm sure they will come.
Thank you for your feedback. Delighted to know you found the video informative. Please stay connected for more videos.
Great video
.. but you seem to be hyper focused on Ubuntu (based on Debian)
Will you do some others vids on other lines of Linux - Debian, Arch, Gentoo, Fedora, Slackware, Open Suse'?
Thank you for your feedback and for watching the video! We are constantly working on various Linux-related content to cater to a broader audience. Feel free to explore our website: LinuxSimply and RUclips channel for diverse contents.
I've switched to nala. It looks so purrrrrrrittttyyyyy~ 😗
Thank you for sharing your experience. It’s great to hear that you are enjoying nala. It can be deemed as a cleaner alternative to apt. However it’s important to note that it may not run every apt command. If you have any specific thoughts or insights about nala that you'd like to share, feel free to let us know.
Thank you for these interesting explanations.
I mainly use pacman, but it's interesting to know the differences between apt-get and apt.
**
Merci pour ces intéressantes explications.
J'utilise principalement pacman, mais il est intéressant de connaître les différences entre apt-get et apt.
Thank you for your feedback. Delighted to know you found the video informative. Please stay connected for more videos.
Thanks, very easy to understand. You honours your name!
Thrilled to hear that you found the video helpful. Thanks for your support. Stay with us.
it seem apt-get would be suited to use in a script kicked off by cron or at.
Thank you for sharing your perspective. Considering the compatibility, apt-get can indeed be a good choice for scripts since it has been around for a long time. Stay tuned for more Linux-related content.
tl;dr apt get is a better version of apt-get. It would have replaced apt-get, but the general kaos of linux apparently dropped that ball.
Thank you for sharing your perspective. Emergence of apt which is an improved version of apt-get reflects the adaptability of the Linux community. Stay tuned for more Linux-related videos.
What about aptitude?
If you have a good understanding of Linux package management, apt and apt-get are usually the preferred choices, particularly for Debian-based distributions. However, if you are new to Linux or require advanced dependency resolution, aptitude can be a great alternative that provides both command line and text-based interfaces.
❤
Thank you for your feedback. Please stay connected for more videos.
Very helpful
Glad to hear that. Thank you! ❤
smh, the difference is apt-get is deprecated and apt is not
Thank you for pointing that out. Apt is the recommended package tool. However, apt-get is used for older systems. We appreciate your input. Stay tuned!
Wow that means the answer to the title of the Video is just "apt-get is trash because its outdated"
Thank you for watching the video and sharing your thoughts. It's important to clarify that both package management tools have their own strengths and use cases. Apt is more user-friendly and supports newer version of Debian. On the other hand, apt-get is a preferred choice for older Debian versions and users who want in-depth package management control. To learn more about this topic, feel free to explore the article linked in the video description.