F22 Raptor The World's Most Advanced Fighter

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
  • Lets take a look at the world’s most advanced fighter - the F22 Raptor, a documentary.
    Support this channel:
    / pilotphotog
    Join the Discord:
    / discord
    Design support provided by BVR:
    bvr.design/
    Overview
    Widely considered the best air superiority fighter in the world, the Lockheed Martin F-22 is a fifth generation, twin engine, single seat, all weather stealth tactical fighter aircraft. Developed from decades of air combat experience the F-22 excels in its one true mission: to defeat any air adversary it encounters. This is accomplished by the Raptor’s incredible performance, advanced avionics, and stealth profile. Notable features include twin tails, a trapezoidal wing, and a golden canopy which is coated with a thin layer of Indium Tin Oxide or ITO which acts like an EM shield to maintain stealth characteristics.
    Having been deployed since 2005, let’s take a look at some specifications for the F-22 Raptor:
    Specifications
    Length: 62 ft 1 in (18.92 m)
    Height: 16 ft 8 in (5.08 m)
    Wingspan: 44 ft 6 in (13.56 m)
    Maximum speed: Mach 2.25 (1,500 mph, 2,414 km/h)
    Mach 1.21, 800 knots (921 mph; 1,482 km/h) at sea level
    Mach 1.82 (1,220 mph, 1,963 km/h) supercruise at altitude
    Empty weight: 43,340 lb (19,700 kg)
    Max. takeoff weight:: 83,500 lb (38,000 kg)
    RANGE: 1,600 nmi (1,800 mi, 3,000 km) or more with 2 external fuel tanks
    Engine Thrust Class
    F119-PW-100 augmented turbofans, 26,000 lbf (116 kN) thrust each dry, 35,000 lbf (156 kN) with afterburner
    thrust dry,
    with afterburner
    Thrust to weight ratio: 1.25 with loaded weight and 50% internal fuel
    Credits/Attributions:
    "The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement.”
    Special thanks to Lockheed Martin for providing excellent footage to help me make this video.
    www.lockheedma...
    MG-29 Photo:
    Vitaly V. Kuzmin / CC BY-SA (creativecommon...)
    SU-27 Photo:
    Dmitriy Pichugin [GFDL 1.2 (www.gnu.org/lic...) or GFDL 1.2 (www.gnu.org/lic...)]
    F22 Radar:
    Daderot / CC0
    Music from filmmusic.io "Hiding Your Reality" by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) License: CC BY (creativecommons...)
    This video is an opinion editorial commentary.
    Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use purposes such as criticism, commentary, parody, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
    All works used in this video (Images, audio etc) belong to their respective authors
    (This does not include the audio commentary).

Комментарии • 513

  • @bdh985
    @bdh985 4 года назад +210

    Didn't build nearly enough F-22's for a number of reasons. Makes me sick to think about. Great video as always! Yes on the YF-23 vid

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +16

      Agreed and will start working on YF-23 vid. Thanks for commenting!

    • @johanfeenstra8778
      @johanfeenstra8778 4 года назад +13

      We are forgetting the WW2 lessons. Quality and Quantity. We had more Shermans than the Germans had tiger tanks, etc etc. The F22 is a amazing airplane but way way too expensive. And the problem for that is... no oversite of the pentagon and less and less manufacturing companies (compettition). And politics is corrupted with all the lobbyists roaming the halls of congress. Greetings from the Netherlands.

    • @lucifermorningstar4548
      @lucifermorningstar4548 4 года назад +7

      Johan Feenstra well as a Lockheed Martin employee (at Marietta) I can honestly say us production employees are doing what we can to keep costs in line. We are highly skilled workers and are paid as such. You get what you pay for.

    • @johanfeenstra8778
      @johanfeenstra8778 4 года назад +6

      @@lucifermorningstar4548 Employees are not the problem, they deserve a good pay.

    • @lucifermorningstar4548
      @lucifermorningstar4548 4 года назад +3

      Johan Feenstra oh believe me, this place is top heavy (lots of management) but it is what it is.

  • @thesirmaddog8209
    @thesirmaddog8209 4 года назад +216

    A video on the YF-23 would be liked

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +7

      Thank you and working on just that.

    • @shashanktangwan6104
      @shashanktangwan6104 4 года назад

      I second that.👍👍

    • @doncalypso
      @doncalypso 4 года назад

      @@PilotPhotog excellent!!!!

    • @wayneyd2
      @wayneyd2 4 года назад +1

      Show how the YF-23 was screw over by the USAF.

    • @AvArIeNmArKu4
      @AvArIeNmArKu4 4 года назад +1

      @@PilotPhotog if its under 30mins i will dislike it xD and unsubscribe

  • @justme3894
    @justme3894 4 года назад +87

    YES.....Please, a video on the YF 23.....

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +1

      Thank you and working on it!

  • @herbertkeithmiller
    @herbertkeithmiller 4 года назад +48

    There's one big problem with the F22 . . . We don't have enough of them!

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +4

      Agreed and thanks for commenting!

    • @denniscrider3776
      @denniscrider3776 3 года назад +1

      The F22 has several problems.
      1) Cost
      2) Spends more time in maintenance than it does in combat status
      3) Enough said

    • @cnlbenmc
      @cnlbenmc 3 года назад

      I think a bigger problem is it's old wierd 1990s computers and strange proprietary computer code that are a bitch to work with, so much so that I think Helmet Mounted Displays still aren't compatible with it. The idea probably was to in the future simply pull the computers from the modular avionics bays to replace them with entirely new ones but it would have been so expensive that it hasn't gotten funding to do so till very recently.

    • @presidentbanana4536
      @presidentbanana4536 3 года назад +1

      @@cnlbenmc I'm curious, why would putting in new computers be so expensive? I imagine you wouldn't need anything terribly powerful, and updating the software for it wouldn't be very expensive either, at least by US military standards.

    • @myusername3689
      @myusername3689 3 года назад

      @@denniscrider3776 Soooooo just cost.......

  • @swaghauler8334
    @swaghauler8334 4 года назад +47

    I think they should "upsize" the F-23 Blackwidow about 20% and call it a long-range Interceptor. The F23's reduced maneuverability versus the F22 is a non-issue with an Interceptor but the increased range and stealth of an enlarged F23 would fill a "capability gap" in our air envelope that would allow a "stand-off attack" for carriers AND US airbases abroad. The imagined F23 SHOULD be redesigned for both CAP and Strike missions and be Carrier deployable.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +5

      I like this idea, thanks for commenting!

    • @rapidsqualor5367
      @rapidsqualor5367 4 года назад +4

      I wish yf-23.net was still up. I heard somewhere that the hardened hangers in Europe can hold a maximum of 75' aircraft so the "upsize" should probably be limited to that length. People may hate the F-35 airframe but the plane has some great parts. If they could redesign for parts commonality with F-35 and two of the latest version GE F136 engines, well, it could make a good escort for a B21. The problem would be doing all that and keeping what made the YF-23 great. I read that the YF-23 conformed to the Area-Rule more than any other plane while also being very stealthy.

    • @wreksangel
      @wreksangel 4 года назад +1

      Great thoughts, and definitely ideas that are on point. Agreed!

    • @swaghauler8334
      @swaghauler8334 4 года назад +4

      @@rapidsqualor5367 I would widen the airframe just a bit and lengthen it slightly. The biggest area I could see expanding is to "fill in" the area between the engines over her "spine" right up to the bulge where the back of the cockpit rises up (just like designers are doing with the newer "conformal electronics" rigs that are being added to legacy aircraft). This shouldn't affect the F23's radar profile from ground tracking or the normal lower intercept angles (because the merging aircraft is climbing from takeoff to intercept the F23) too much. This "spinal bulge" would allow the "deepening" of the weapons bay to accommodate larger-diameter weapons like the newer anti-ship missiles, the new standoff cruise missiles, and more AMRAAMS. The slightly wider wings would accommodate more fuel.
      I would also like to retrofit a newer version of the airframe with the same low-profile removable hard-points that give the F35 its "beast mode" capability. As I recall, the early model pylons carried two AMRAAMS tucked up against the wing on either side of the pylon and an AIM9X on the bottom of the pylon. The pylons were much lower in profile than gen 4 aircraft pylons and I can see the drag being reduced compared to conventional pylons. I'd make the inboard ones "wet" for fuel tanks as well. With four pylons attached, the weapons payloads would increase by 8 AMRAAMs and 4 AIM9X Sidewinders for fleet defense or "missile truck" duties.
      Coupled with the F35's digital interface and sensor integration, this would be a great INTERCEPTOR to compliment both the shorter-ranged but more agile F22 flying CAP and the F35 flying CAS and "observer" for "missile trucks" (legacy 15's with quad missile rails in a standoff position).

    • @ivanlagrossemoule
      @ivanlagrossemoule 4 года назад +3

      It would be stupid, because the YF-23 was designed in the 90s and already had design problems back then, with the airframe not being as developed as the YF-22.
      The YF-23 isn't going to happen because it's a better idea to develop something new.

  • @kevinhatcher3765
    @kevinhatcher3765 4 года назад +22

    You're videos are starting to show up in people's recommended sections now congrats!

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +1

      Glad to hear that and thanks for commenting!

  • @ExUSSailor
    @ExUSSailor 4 года назад +14

    Hard to believe this aircraft is over 20 years old now.

  • @lt.x-02s-wyvern25
    @lt.x-02s-wyvern25 4 года назад +22

    Looking at the F-22 should be the Air Force main superioty fighter, while YF-23 should have been along the lines of a fighter bomber to alleviate the lower numbers of B-2s

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +6

      That would have been awesome!

    • @CorruptInfinityOfficial
      @CorruptInfinityOfficial 3 года назад +1

      Too bad that’s just not it works at all, companies compete for DoD contracts through design competition to show who deserves the contract.

  • @phased-arraych.9150
    @phased-arraych.9150 4 года назад +14

    I’m frustrated on how the USAF refuses to sign off on resuming F-22 production or invest in developing an upgraded variant.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +2

      Agreed and thanks for commenting!

    • @solarissv777
      @solarissv777 4 года назад +3

      Especially after Japan suggested to split the cost, if they were allowed to buy some.

    • @W1ckedRcL
      @W1ckedRcL 3 года назад +2

      It's because they're working on a 6th gen fighter to replace it.

    • @Noisy_Cricket
      @Noisy_Cricket 2 года назад +2

      @@W1ckedRcL it's also because the F35's sensor and comm abilities already outclass the F22, and it's stealth coating is fragile and hard to maintain. If production were to be restarted, it would cost a ton to correct these problems AND restart production. So that's why the Air Force is just deciding to move on. The F22 is a fantastic aircraft, but it was made for a fight that doesn't exist today really.
      The reason the 4th gen fighters (save the Tomcat) have survived so long is because they are easy to produce and are pretty much perfect for the roles they are asked to play. Much like the fighter generations post WWII (where the Mustang was pretty much the perfect fighter), we're kinda in an era we're searching around for what we want out of a fighter aircraft.

  • @jimsheppard6726
    @jimsheppard6726 4 года назад +6

    Great video, by the way. Well researched and well presented, as always. If you're still considering a vid on the YF-23, I'd be glad to see it

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      Thank you and yes still working on the YF-23 video. Stay tuned!

  • @lucifermorningstar4548
    @lucifermorningstar4548 4 года назад +56

    Btw the last F-22 was delivered in 2012. I was standing 30 feet from it. Sad times 😞.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +12

      That is sad to think the "newest" one is 8 years old - I really wished they had resumed production in 2016. Thanks for commenting

    • @SvenTviking
      @SvenTviking 4 года назад +3

      The stupidest thing Obama did.

    • @SvenTviking
      @SvenTviking 4 года назад

      Josh Mkensie Justify your statement.

    • @lucifermorningstar4548
      @lucifermorningstar4548 4 года назад +6

      Josh Mkensie I don’t get people like you, Obama isn’t the President, and you guys ranted and raved about the pre-Covid Trump economy. Looks to me like you need to try justifying Trump by putting down Obama. Don’t act like Trump is even close to perfect. I mean Fox News was talking like Ebola was going to destroy the USA and we had 2 people die. Why not just say you don’t like his skin color?

    • @lucifermorningstar4548
      @lucifermorningstar4548 4 года назад +1

      Josh Mkensie ok troll.

  • @cattledog901
    @cattledog901 4 года назад +20

    I love the F22 and it's an amazing plane, however I feel that the YF23 had alot more growth potential and would have fit in better with what the airforce considers will be future air combat. Larger munitions storage, more range, more stealth etc and would have also made an excellent fighter bomber.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +6

      Agreed and thanks for commenting!

    • @Rampant16
      @Rampant16 4 года назад +3

      YF23 does sound more similar to the USAF's requirements for the 6th gen Penetrating Counter Air of more range and weapons load.

  • @lilhotdog7011
    @lilhotdog7011 4 года назад +16

    The most beautiful aircraft in the world

  • @Viperboeing757
    @Viperboeing757 4 года назад +6

    Excellent video ! Could you possibly do a video on the B-2 Spirit ? The origins of that aircraft , rooted in Jack Northrops research in the 1940s and 1950s , is simply incredible .

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +2

      Thank you and glad you enjoyed the video...yes I plan on a whole series on bombers, including the B-2.

  • @michaeld1170
    @michaeld1170 4 года назад +4

    Regarding the YF-22 vs YF-23, note that the latter has half the number of control surfaces of the YF-22.
    So this whole idea that the edge in maneuverability of the 22 was minimal is pretty unrealistic.
    The YF-23's pelican tail for example is used for both yaw, pitch and roll control, you can't tell me that it won't be compromised if the pilot decides to perform a roll while at high alpha and input some yaw movements as well.
    Also according to Paul Metz's lecture, he showed a graph where the YF-23 and YF-22's speeds were illustrated, the gap wasn't large.
    So if the YF-23 won, we could be talking about the YF-22 which was far more maneuverable and only slightly slower.

    • @DemonicANG3L1
      @DemonicANG3L1 4 года назад

      What could have been, the F-22 Raptor - Air Superiority Fighter, capable of dominating the skies in small numbers and providing real time surveillance, the F-23 Black Widow - Long Range Deepstrike Fighter, capable of carrying long range cruise missiles for defeating long range SAMs, and using its range, and stealth to dive deep into enemy territory to intercept escorted long-range bombers and GTFO while the enemy is in a panic.
      Could have gotten the 2 airframes and created the ultimate duo!

    • @michaeld1170
      @michaeld1170 4 года назад +2

      @@DemonicANG3L1
      In a perfect world with limitless money yes. I hope it happened too.
      But the YF-23 actually has a smaller weapons bay and can only hold 5 missiles to the YF-22's 8. Northrop promised to stretch the design to accommodate more missiles in a stacked configuration (see F-23 EMD) but would it retain the same speed and maneuverability as the original? We don't know.
      To an effect, the F-35 has much longer range and can carry cruise missiles like the AGM-154 internally

  • @maxhaines3794
    @maxhaines3794 4 года назад +2

    What a plane and what a video about it. Great work!

  • @amcds2867
    @amcds2867 3 года назад +1

    These videos bring a smile to my face. Awesome stuff! Keep them coming!

  • @mikedepaz666
    @mikedepaz666 4 года назад +3

    LOOKS LIKE THE YF23 IS MORE FUTURISTIC AND VERY SLEEK !! THEY COULD HAVE JUST COMBINED ALL THE SUPERIOR TRAITS OF BOTH DESIGNS AND CAME UP WITH A SUPREME TACTICAL FIGHTER , AGREE GUYS ??!!

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +1

      Hopefully that is what they do with the upcoming 6th gen fighter....thanks for commenting!

  • @SriHari722
    @SriHari722 4 года назад +2

    Hey mate.. thanks for this video... good work...keep posting videos...and please do a video on su 30 mki,Rafale and Tejas...

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +2

      Thanks for the comment and I do plan on all those aircraft as well.

  • @dr.j5642
    @dr.j5642 4 года назад +8

    Ah the F22, the envy of the world's skies. Not only is she a lethal threat to anything flying through the air, but she looks mean as heck to boot! These things will still be lethal even when 6th generation fighters start flying.

    • @kristianxoto
      @kristianxoto 4 года назад +1

      F-22 raptor is obsolete, even USAF knows that thats why they are planning to develop a new air superiority fighter, since F-35 is multirtole and not suited for air combat against modern enemies. but u cant restart production of F-22 because most parts are no longer in construction since the tech is from 90's

    • @dr.j5642
      @dr.j5642 4 года назад +4

      @@kristianxoto Obsolete would mean it is substandard for the era. The F22 is still arguably the most advanced fighter today, so no you're mistaken. What you mean is they will become obsolete when 6th generation and 6.5 generation fighters are the norm, but that is more than a decade away. So until then, they are anything but obsolete. Though, for the near-ish future of air superiority, they will become obsolete before long, since projections for air based warfare will focus on super long range, beyond visual range style of warfare, as well as having unorthodox capabilities such as direct energy weapons and electronic warfare. No one is saying we should produce more F22s, although there is a long list of nations that would order hundreds right now if given the chance. However, the F22 is the king today and will continue holding things down for at least another decade, especially being paired with F35s.

    • @kristianxoto
      @kristianxoto 4 года назад +1

      @@dr.j5642 here is entire comment i would like to use, i did shorten original down :) F-22 raptor is obsolete, even USAF knows that thats why they are planning to develop a new air superiority fighter, since F-35 is multirtole and not suited for air combat against modern enemies. but u cant restart production of F-22 because most parts are no longer in construction since the tech is from 90's. even worse the original radars were never ordered because of cost and 3D vectoring which russian aircraft did have decades earlier, was cut because of cost savings. and btw russians have tracked f-35 and f-22 fighters over syria, so it can be shot down

    • @kristianxoto
      @kristianxoto 4 года назад

      @@dr.j5642 i love the raptor but 1 big drawback is it can not fire while in extreme manouvres since weapons bay uses gravity. SU-57 was demonstrated to have "ejection" mechanism when firing in a zoom climb and upside down. can try to locate video but u can see the missile gets "blown out" from the bay since gravity is no longer of any assist. F-22 was planned with that in mind but just like original radar and thrus vectors, it was cut for cost saving

    • @dr.j5642
      @dr.j5642 4 года назад +1

      @@kristianxoto Yeah but you're comparing a 5th generation fighter designed in the 90s, first flight in 97, to a 5th generation designed in the 2000s, first flight in 2010, which hasn't even been fielded yet. The Su-57 is going to be 20 years behind the F22 by the time they get a fleet of them in the air, lets say 2025. And by that time, the US will soon have 6th generation fighters coming down the pipeline. Also the cost saving cuts made to the F22 occurred when the US decided it was going to make a drastically smaller number of them than originally planned, which was also executed because there was not a perceived threat from near peer adversaries like China and Russia, since their 5th generation programs were falling behind ours by a decade or more. Besides, I think the sheer number of F35s we have will be more than enough to handle however many Su-57s the Russians can field, then not much longer after that we will have hundreds of 6th generation fighters in the air.

  • @athrunzala6919
    @athrunzala6919 4 года назад +3

    I love this plane, and yes do a F-23 video too please

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      Will do and thanks for commenting!

  • @samferraro6756
    @samferraro6756 4 года назад +7

    You make great videos and your research is excellent. I would really enjoy your video of the YF-23. Please Please!

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +1

      Thank you and working on it!

  • @mikekopack6441
    @mikekopack6441 3 года назад +1

    I used to drive past Dobbins NAS on my way to work in Marietta, GA back in the early 2000s as these were rolling off the line. There were many mornings where I would catch a site of a brand new F-22 taking off on its maiden flight followed by an F-16 chase plane. The Raptor would take off and go immediately vertical. The F-16 (which looked like a toy in comparison) couldn’t match the climb...
    I was so sad the day the last one came off the line and I stopped getting to see that. Luckily I got to tour the assembly line once and actually got to touch a Raptor undergoing final assembly. (I’ve also toured the F35 line and similarly touched one of those). Absolutely amazing aircraft! Have also gotten to play around in both of Lockheed’s sims for those planes and it’s like night and day compared to the F-16 one... completely different tactics, different way of approaching an engagement.

  • @scarface9767
    @scarface9767 4 года назад +6

    i played a game called heatseeker on ps2 that you can oporate a f22 raptor from an aircraft carrier along with f15 and f16s and the f35 nice job on the video the f22 raptor was my childhood favorite plane and still is

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +4

      I remember that game! Have you played any of the Ace Combat games?

    • @Slender_Man_186
      @Slender_Man_186 4 года назад

      PilotPhotog his name is Scarface and he has Phoenix as his profile pic, he’s definitely played Ace Combat.

  • @This_Is_Actual
    @This_Is_Actual 4 года назад +4

    PLEASE make a yf 23 video

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      Thanks for commenting and I am working on the YF-23 video

  • @chichiboypumpi
    @chichiboypumpi 4 года назад +7

    the only fighter I didn't acquire in Ace Combat Infinity, because almost everyone had it, and its variants

  • @cgirl111
    @cgirl111 4 года назад +20

    The only plane in America's arsenal that we wouldn't sell to allied nations.

    • @L33tSkE3t
      @L33tSkE3t 4 года назад +3

      Yeah, there is actually a law preventing it's sale and export to allied Nations. I think we should reconsider that. We could update the F-22s with F-35 Avionics software and Hardware and I know Japan has expressed great interest in the F-22 and recently increase it's F-35 orders to 147, making it the second largest foreign operator of the Type behind the UK.

    • @wreksangel
      @wreksangel 4 года назад +2

      It's not the avionics that prevents sales to allies. It has to do with the F-22s groundbreaking, cutting edge radar. It hasba passive scan ability that allows it to detect other aircraft while remaining invisible itself. Thats not technology we want getting into the wrong hands, and some of our allies such as Israel, have done just that in the past. Thats why the 1998 "Obey amendment" was passed.
      Side note: the amendment was named for Congressman David Obey, Democrat from Wisconsin, 7th district.

    • @L33tSkE3t
      @L33tSkE3t 4 года назад +1

      @@wreksangel Yeah, I know. I never said the avionics is what prevented the exportation of F-22s to other countries, I even mentioned the law amended that prevents it's sale. I was just suggesting we should reconsider that for close allies like Japan. The F-35 has a similar passively scanning radar that implements similar technology to that of the F-22. What I meant by avionics was the F-35s updated computer systems and Pilot helmet mounted display system that allows for pilots to see through the aircraft with the integrated sensor suite.

    • @appa609
      @appa609 4 года назад

      That's what doomed it

    • @L33tSkE3t
      @L33tSkE3t 4 года назад

      William Johnson Bill Clinton was president during the F-22s initial development, I don't see why who the President becomes would have anything to do with the modernization of the F22, especially if it's already underway.

  • @rafaelrodrigo7935
    @rafaelrodrigo7935 4 года назад +5

    Congrats, Bro!!!

  • @Strato13
    @Strato13 4 года назад +1

    I’ve seen the YF 23 many times.
    She sits with a few other aircraft in the city of Torrance.
    I’ve gotten up close, taken pictures of her, and have touched that beautiful plane when they had it out in the other end of Zamperini Airfield. She’s just as beautiful in real life.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +1

      Thanks for sharing, I would love to see that bird up close...working on the video all about the YF-23...coming soon!

    • @Strato13
      @Strato13 4 года назад

      @@PilotPhotog Yeah, now she rests alongside an old Tomcat, a Starfighter type single engine jet plane, and some other jet.
      I'm not sure that they take care of her anymore. Her windows are whited-out and everything looks dilapidated.

  • @CG-cw3ps
    @CG-cw3ps 4 года назад +1

    That Cobra side-by-side was sick, PilotPhotog

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +1

      Glad you enjoyed it!

    • @CG-cw3ps
      @CG-cw3ps 4 года назад +1

      @@PilotPhotog - I always enjoy your work, brother.

  • @SahanModelbuilding
    @SahanModelbuilding 4 года назад +3

    Great video as always, and very informative

  • @billhanna2148
    @billhanna2148 4 года назад +3

    Thank you for your work 👍 it's an excellent succinct and informative video. Yeah we didn't build nearly enough of them and we should sooner than later

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +1

      Glad you enjoyed it and I appreciate your comment, agree that we should have built more.

  • @deltadaggertm4011
    @deltadaggertm4011 4 года назад +4

    YF-23 was the most beautiful plane that was not approved for production. Its even stealthier and faster than the Raptor. But during that time, they are looking for an advance fighter, Raptor is much more agile and maneuverable. 2 of the reasons why YF-23 was snubbed is because of its cost per unit which will go approx at 250mil per plane, and they have doubts if Northrop Grumman is capable for mass production.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      Well said and thanks for commenting!

  • @stianhult
    @stianhult 3 года назад +2

    Best fighter and look most bad ass so cool, love from norway🇳🇴👌

  • @joelocampo8460
    @joelocampo8460 3 года назад +2

    You have very good documentary videos with great footage and lots of information. I viewed this one and the Eurofighter so far, and I’d like to see a feature on Rafale. Thank you.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  3 года назад +1

      Thank you much appreciated! Working on the Rafale video

  • @heavyizthacrown-5842
    @heavyizthacrown-5842 3 года назад +3

    Yes I want a video of the Black Widow & Grey Ghost.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  3 года назад +1

      Working on it, coming soon- thanks for commenting!

  • @FreshCoolBeer
    @FreshCoolBeer 3 года назад

    What a beautiful jet, the prettiest of them all and the color is like a combination between the Black Widow and the Gray Ghost of the YF-23.

  • @Viperboeing757
    @Viperboeing757 3 года назад

    Excellent F22 video . The Raptor is definitely the Lamborghini of the skies . Truly a badazz . 🇺🇲

  • @estherakeode2580
    @estherakeode2580 3 года назад +2

    A video of the yf23 will be loved

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  3 года назад +1

      Working on it, thanks for commenting!

  • @xprettylightsx
    @xprettylightsx 3 года назад

    Your videos are loved by thousands .. must feel awesome . Great job , hard work pays off. Cheers to your success .

  • @shapiro5000
    @shapiro5000 4 года назад +9

    The Raptor is awesome!! We just really haven't gotten our money's worth out of them because there are only 20 or so adversary aircraft that might have a chance of matching them (Chinese J-20) and WWIII hasn't happened. If only they had more AG capability like the F-35 does and I think we would have seen them replace the F-15C/E fleet already!
    With data link, an extremely advanced radar, the air to air potential and ability to work well with our advanced Fourth Gen fighters, what this aircraft can do is awesome even in small numbers!

    • @appengr3278
      @appengr3278 4 года назад +5

      Don't fool your self, the Chengdu J20 cannot super cruise, doesn't have the maneuverability, and it doesn't have stealth like the f22, the f22 shows up as big as a marble on radar. First see, first shot, first kill, and people still talking about dog fighting.

    • @burnerjack01
      @burnerjack01 4 года назад +2

      Didn't get our money's worth? Because there was no WWIII?
      Maybe there hasn't been a WWIII partly because of the F-22.
      If true, we MORE than got our money's worth.

    • @t74guard78
      @t74guard78 4 года назад +1

      Why do some people keep insisting on mentioning the J-20 and F-22 in the same breathe? The J-20 is no where near in the same class as the F-22. The J-20 is a 4th gen fighter and the F-15, 16 & 18 can see it, track it and shoot it down. The F-22 has more important things to do so let those fighters handle the J-20. With American pilots those legacy fighters won't have any problem blowing them out of the sky. The J-20 has as much chance of matching the F-22 as you do walking to the moon.

  • @estherakeode2580
    @estherakeode2580 3 года назад +4

    The f22 design is a modern design. while the yf23 design is the design of the future

  • @EricPalmerBlog
    @EricPalmerBlog 3 года назад

    One of the most impressive things about the F-22 is the AN/ALR-94. This is a passive sensor system where 30 apertures around the airframe feed information into a combat system that can detect some air to air radars up to 250 miles away. The combat system starts building a tracking solution of spikes picked up in this manner. And this is displayed on a screen. In some cases, AIM-120 AMRAAMS can be fired solely on this passive information. When the AESA radar is needed to emit, the combat system uses the absolute least amount of power to get the job done so as to keep potential threats unaware. It is a system that is rarely mentioned when the topic of the F-22 is brought up. Various upgrade packages have made it capable of working on ground spikes. And thus, able to take out some ground air defense threat with the Small Diameter Bomb (and sometimes JDAM).

  • @fpena6038
    @fpena6038 4 года назад +2

    Definitely yes, make a YF-23 video.

  • @morskojvolk
    @morskojvolk 4 года назад +1

    Wonderful rundown of the F-22. New sub!

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      Thank you, much appreciated!

  • @andreasleonardo6793
    @andreasleonardo6793 4 года назад

    Too nice video with clear explaining of characters thanks

  • @johnmay6090
    @johnmay6090 4 года назад +2

    Another really good video! Yes, I'd like to see a video about the runner-up to the F 22. Thankyou.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      Thank you and working on it!

  • @georgealfaras6695
    @georgealfaras6695 3 года назад +1

    Awesome...Terrific... Deadly! Thank you, U.S. Air Force....

  • @StealthyAviator
    @StealthyAviator 4 года назад +3

    loved it!!!

  • @mathewmartin4993
    @mathewmartin4993 4 года назад +1

    Would totally dig a YF23 video!

  • @susanartigas7498
    @susanartigas7498 4 года назад +2

    Thanks for an excellent video, like always . Very good research.

  • @bujoun76
    @bujoun76 4 года назад +2

    Yes!
    We want to see a dedicated video on the YF-23 please!!!

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      Working on it and thanks for commenting

  • @douglasburt1622
    @douglasburt1622 3 года назад +2

    Yes, YF23 vid , please!

  • @tieck4408
    @tieck4408 4 года назад +1

    Solid video, great visuals and editing

  • @FloridaManMatty
    @FloridaManMatty 4 года назад +1

    PLEASE do a video on the YF-23.
    I have had the pleasure of seeing PAV-1 in person (two years ago yesterday as a matter of fact!) and still get chills up my spine every time I think about the moment my eyes first found it among the other amazing planes at Wright Patterson.
    ATF was a tricky competition. In the end, I do feel that the “best” plane won, but in this case, the best was definitely not the most advanced. 30 years later, if the YF-23 was unveiled today, not only would still look like something from 30 more years into the future, with a few software and sensor upgrades, it would probably outperform anything it met in the air for many, many years to come.
    The YF-23 was, and still is, absolutely one of the most visually stunning airplanes to ever take to the skies. I would love to see this channel’s take on the ATF and ultimate fate of the Black Widow II, including the talk in some aviation circles that one was refueled over TTR many years AFTER PAV-1 and PAV-2 were put on display by a member of one of the larger online military aviation forums. YCKAWOTG😉

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      Thanks for commenting Matthew and I am actively working on the YF-23 video. I want to get it right so taking my time as I work on other videos. Check the community tab of this channel for updates and release dates.

  • @blairanderson9098
    @blairanderson9098 Год назад

    YES! I’d love to see a video on the YF-23! I still wish they’d have gone through with funding for both aircraft.

  • @KernowekTim
    @KernowekTim 4 года назад +1

    Wickedness on wings. For me, it's the Gyr Falcon of the skies. When it appears, even eagles clear out, because it definitely can kill them, with savage intent. Again, you have excelled yourself! Whatever next? Sadly the 71 has been done to death, and there is not recent HQ film coverage. Pity that........Stay safe man: keep them coming!

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      Thanks Tim! Working on YF-23 video next and will see what I can do about the SR-71

    • @KernowekTim
      @KernowekTim 4 года назад

      @@PilotPhotog Looking forward to your cover of the YF-23. Perhaps more F22s should've been built, but with their kill to loss ratios, perhaps there is little need? Stay safe man. ATB .

  • @jerlee620
    @jerlee620 4 года назад +1

    Just subscribed & saw this..SO EXCITED to watch lol .Love the F22!

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      Thank you for subscribing, more videos on the way!

  • @jonniiinferno9098
    @jonniiinferno9098 4 года назад +1

    This was an awesome video !! Absolutely YES - do the YF-23 video - please.

  • @Rampant16
    @Rampant16 4 года назад +1

    Nice vid man, your video quality is absolutely there. You just gotta keep producing videos and eventually you'll gain more subs. I found you very recently by random recommendations but if you keep turning out these great vids you'll keep gaining views and subs.
    Definitely consider reaching out to guys like Matsimus, he also does vids on military equipment and seems like a super nice guy. Collaborations/shoutouts from him could give you a big viewer increase.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +1

      Thank you for the kind words, I actually follow Matsimus and would love to collab with him sometime, I will reach out and see if he is interested.

  • @flynntaggart8549
    @flynntaggart8549 4 года назад +5

    i think "advanced" is not best term, the f-35 is arguably more advanced compared to the f-22, but the f-22 was actually designed to be an air superiority fighter first, whereas the f-35 is a multi-role fighter, so despite the decent gap in tech the f-22 would of course be able to fulfill it's designed role better than an airplane that wasn't expressly designed to be an air superiority fighter. even in an air superiority role, the f-35 has some major advantages over the older f-22, mainly the avionics and networking.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +3

      Fair point and my implication was in the realm of air superiority fighter, thanks for commenting!

    • @bryanst.martin7134
      @bryanst.martin7134 4 года назад

      Avionics packages become smaller every day. Upgrades to substantially smaller, more powerful systems is more easy to integrate than ever. The YF23 was a superior platform. Money made this decision, and not functionality

  • @jacobdautriche9023
    @jacobdautriche9023 4 года назад +1

    Great video. I think there are at least three challengers to the air superiority of the F-22:
    S 500
    SU 57
    The F22 itself: sun-issue apparently melting the plane and the g force in the cockpit knocking out the pilots.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      The S-500 and SU-57 are definitely competitors or challenges to the F-22, I do know that early on the F-22 had some oxygen issues which could potentially knock out a pilot but haven't heard about a sun issue? Thanks for commenting.

    • @jacobdautriche9023
      @jacobdautriche9023 4 года назад

      @@PilotPhotog thx. I found this picture www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/29218/these-images-of-an-f-22-raptors-crumbling-radar-absorbent-skin-are-fascinating
      And this article sputniknews.com/military/201908011076431443-f-22s-problems-with-stealth-coating-revealed/
      But couldnt find the source I was looking for. Its like 3 or 5 years since I fell over it...

    • @jacobdautriche9023
      @jacobdautriche9023 4 года назад

      @@PilotPhotog this article might be of interest too: www.dailypress.com/military/dp-xpm-20120527-2012-05-27-dp-nws-raptor-pilot-survey-20120527-story.html

  • @82raptor
    @82raptor 4 года назад +17

    We should have twice as many raptors! Spending the same amount of money on a 40 year old design is just stupid!

    • @TheRibbonRed
      @TheRibbonRed 4 года назад +5

      I guarantee you that "same amount of money" actually has a lot more cuts for the DoD & politicians themselves than for the cost of production.

    • @appa609
      @appa609 4 года назад +5

      F-15's serve a different role as bomb/missile trucks. I think it's dumb that they put all the air superiority eggs in the F-35 basket. If we had 500 F-22's we wouldn't need 1700 F-35's.

  • @ArthurCentrino
    @ArthurCentrino 4 года назад +1

    Awesome aircraft

  • @pkmodeling
    @pkmodeling 4 года назад +1

    The YF-23 is a favourite of mine, yes to video!!!

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +1

      Thanks for commenting and being a subscriber, I am digging deep to get some good footage of the YF-23 as well as having some artists create 3D models of this amazing airplane. Stay tuned!

  • @AkebonoRadio
    @AkebonoRadio 4 года назад +1

    Yes please on F-23. Great video!!

  • @cattledog901
    @cattledog901 4 года назад +5

    We need a YF23 video.

  • @pottierkurt1702
    @pottierkurt1702 4 года назад +3

    What 9k???? Damn bruv you blowing up like .. no I can't say that.
    But congrats!!!

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      Thank you and thanks for your continued support!

  • @ShadowOppsRC
    @ShadowOppsRC 4 года назад +1

    yes on the yf23 vid!

  • @andrewbaker234
    @andrewbaker234 2 года назад +1

    more f-22 heck yess!

  • @davidbrooks5742
    @davidbrooks5742 4 года назад +2

    I would like to see a story on the yf23

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      Thanks for commenting and I am working on it!

  • @ronaldwilson1373
    @ronaldwilson1373 4 года назад +9

    We need about a hundred and fifty more at F22,s but with the pandemic going on and the country in crisis, now is not the time😰

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +2

      Agreed and I wish they would have pulled the trigger on the 2016 study...194 F-22s

  • @olivialambert4124
    @olivialambert4124 3 года назад +1

    The YF-22 really had to win. I love the YF-23 a lot more, but it simply doesn't fit the needs as well. Firstly people overestimate stealth - the aircraft are detectable by lower frequency radars by a far greater amount. This isn't a problem as one requires high frequency radars to provide an accurate picture for weapons delivery, but it does shape the requirements. Like the USAF openly admit, the F-22 isn't invisible, it simply can't be fired upon. If the aircraft isn't invisible it is inevitable that it will be forced into dogfights where it can be fired upon visually. Therefore dogfight performance is still incredibly important, and whilst the YF-23 performed exceptionally well against the last generation of threats it wasn't going to compete with the next generation of threats. Indeed the Euro Deltas are already competing very well against the F-22 even at low speeds (despite a lack of thrust vectoring) and the Su-57 is projected to perform even better in that area.
    So to sacrifice the par dogfighting performance (vs 5th gen aircraft) for improved stealth which doesn't work against AWACS and search radars in an environment where every enemy has a datalink to said AWACS and search radars isn't a particularly great tradeoff for an air superiority fighter. The YF-23 would be superior as a strike aircraft for sure and is arguably more technologically advanced, but that wasn't the role required.
    As an aside the cutbacks in both technology (no IRST, no 210 degree radar) and procurement (under 200, machinery destroyed) is utterly absurd and frankly criminal. One has to wonder if it was merely extreme negligence or intentional sabotage. I can't quite envision the latter, but its frankly hard to comprehend the level of negligence considering Russia, China, were already producing aircraft which require the F-22 in great numbers.

  • @glennokert8263
    @glennokert8263 2 года назад

    Yes a very dedicated look at the yf23 please

  • @rdubb77
    @rdubb77 4 года назад +5

    YF-23 was too far ahead of its time. I hope Japan builds it, which is the rumor.

  • @dainisstranga4440
    @dainisstranga4440 4 года назад +2

    Good very good Flay is F22 👍👍👍

  • @7gmeister
    @7gmeister 4 года назад +1

    Wait a minute.. I followed the F-22 closely. I even had a customer that worked at Lockheed and we had a big conversation about it.
    It wasn’t deployed until 2012 and even then full strength didn’t happen until around 2014-15

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +1

      Thanks for commenting, you are right the F-22 didn’t see deployment until 2012 but deliveries to the Air Force started in 2007 and the F-22 was accepted as an operational platform in 2008. As with all new fighters, units were received as they were produced, and this included training squadrons as well.

    • @7gmeister
      @7gmeister 4 года назад

      PilotPhotog cool! Thanks for clearing that up..
      Thought I was going crazy or something 😂

    • @martinrps13
      @martinrps13 4 года назад

      PilotPhotog first delivery to the USAF was in 2003

  • @thesirmaddog8209
    @thesirmaddog8209 4 года назад +4

    Sixth gen should be coming soon, and the Navy will get a variation as well

  • @persiankingish
    @persiankingish 4 года назад +10

    Misleading title. The F-35 series planes now hold the title.
    Those news articles that you have been reading about "F-35 being a trillion dollar malfunctioning weapon" are far from the truth.
    Not only are they cheaper to fly and produce but offer a far more superior situational awareness and are much stealthier than the F-22s.
    Not only that people think that the F-35s suck at dogfight because that’s the image created by years of negative articles while in real world F-35 routinely beats clean F-16 and F-15 or any 4th generation fighter on the planet in BFMs (dogfights) with 100-0 odds, everytime. Combine that with unparalleled data gathering and sharing. You get all of that for $25,000 per hour flight cost compared to F-22s $60,000 per hour flight cost.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +5

      Fair points and I plan on a video all about the F-35 which is itself an amazing platform. The F-35 was designed and envisioned as a true multirole fighter and bomber which it does both very well. Like the F-15 the F-22 was designed as a pure air superiority fighter, excelling at both BVR and WVR combat. In that lens the F-22 is still the world standard by which all other fighters are compared to.

    • @alexdunphy3716
      @alexdunphy3716 4 года назад

      Where is the data for this coming from? Do you have a source? In my experience, technical info coming from anyone who can't explain to you how exactly the technology in question works is highly unreliable. Everyone likes to claim they have a wonder weapon

    • @fpena6038
      @fpena6038 4 года назад +2

      While the F-35 is an excellent platform, and an important integral part of the US air defense programs in all major branches, there are a couple of details that are not quite accurate. As he says in the video, the F-22 is still, in fact, the standard by which air superiority is measured. The F-35 is good with air superiority, but the F-22 is better. Also, if you look at the details on the radar profile of the F-22 vs the F-35, you will see that the F-22 is the stealthier jet by a remarkable degree.
      Are they both stealthy? Yes. Are they both excellent air superiority fighters? Yes. Of the 2, does the F-22 still come first in both of those categories? Yes. Does the F-35 have other things to offer, and have some of those things been fitted into the F-22 since the release of the F-35? Once again, Yes.
      They're both great, but feel free to check the details.

    • @mrpicky1868
      @mrpicky1868 4 года назад

      and we should trust you bcs? )

  • @mohammadsaida4603
    @mohammadsaida4603 4 года назад +1

    Too nice video about F22 raptor with clearly explaining of its characters and abilities 🇺🇸👍👏🏾🦅

  • @michaelkrentzin
    @michaelkrentzin 2 года назад

    The absolute best ever!!!

  • @richvasquez8534
    @richvasquez8534 4 года назад +3

    #1 compatition is none

  • @Blacksheep1968
    @Blacksheep1968 4 года назад +1

    definitely vid on the YF23 pls

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      In the works, and thanks for commenting!

  • @didiandiano
    @didiandiano 4 года назад +1

    Wish F-23 was the winner, it was stealthier and it looked out of this world! Best looking design ever

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +1

      Working on a top 5 fighters that should have been produced...you should check it out when it is released :)

  • @bradgreenwell6097
    @bradgreenwell6097 3 года назад +1

    More F22 plz

  • @SilvanaDil
    @SilvanaDil 3 года назад +2

    Do you see any planes on our radar?
    No, just a bumblebee.
    :-)

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  3 года назад +1

      A bumblebee going Mach 2 :) Thanks for commenting!

    • @SilvanaDil
      @SilvanaDil 3 года назад

      @@PilotPhotog - Gotta say, though: Nothing makes people "ooh" and "ahh" like a B-2.

  • @cnlbenmc
    @cnlbenmc 3 года назад

    Wish they also made the FB-22 Strike Raptor variant and I vote for the next version to be called the F-22C King Raptor!

  • @RichardShelton
    @RichardShelton 4 года назад +2

    I love Raptors, but the USAF blew it when they didn't pick the F-23, in my humble opinion of course.

  • @douglasseab7912
    @douglasseab7912 4 года назад +2

    I think they should have build The YF23 so a good compliment the F22 and we would have a diversity of planes

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      Agreed but I think at the time funds were limited. Thanks for commenting!

  • @andreasleonardo6793
    @andreasleonardo6793 3 года назад

    Amazing video with clear explaining of characters and abilities of F-22 raptor...which until now USA refuse exporting to allies countries of USA...its great one ...nice video send

  • @charge556
    @charge556 2 года назад

    Good channel!

  • @CG-cw3ps
    @CG-cw3ps 4 года назад

    "Sea Raptors"
    That's a wet dream right there.

  • @abcefg1347
    @abcefg1347 4 года назад +2

    You should make a video on South-African produced aircraft. Lots of cool things to talk about!

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      Thank you and I will look into that

  • @garylambert6650
    @garylambert6650 4 года назад +1

    You should most definitely do a special on the Black widow and Grey Ghost!!

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      Thanks Gary! It is in the works and taking my time with the research and the visuals - I really want to do the YF-23 justice

  • @danielosheasy7818
    @danielosheasy7818 4 года назад +2

    Would love to see a video on the YF 23

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      Working on it and thanks for commenting

  • @amcds2867
    @amcds2867 3 года назад

    It's incredible to think that this bird will still be around in 2070 taking into consideration the accelarated rate at which technology is evolving.

  • @Strato13
    @Strato13 4 года назад +16

    Whoah !
    Satan’s Angels!
    Oh dang!
    I love the F22, and wish we had a thousand of them.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад +4

      Fun fact, Robin Olds flew for that unit. I am working on a video all about him, and yes I'd love to have 1k F-22s!

  • @seanhaarhoff3726
    @seanhaarhoff3726 4 года назад +1

    They should have built both of them, both sexy as hell machines and you cant beat the US at building epic fighters.

  • @covert0overt_810
    @covert0overt_810 4 года назад +5

    I still wish they chose the YF23 :( YES DO A VIDEO lol

    • @michaelstodovski2219
      @michaelstodovski2219 4 года назад +2

      Most people like the YF-23 because of It's looks....
      But the costs would have been MUCH worse than what the F-22 and F-35 dealt with. The Raptor was simply slightly safter and *more cost effective.* Which is THE most important thing in a Modern Industrial War envisioned against the Soviets(assuming it didnt go nuclear)

    • @covert0overt_810
      @covert0overt_810 4 года назад +1

      @@michaelstodovski2219 Mmmmm but the F22 production was cut, if cost was a factor.. mind as well spend the extra and get a far better plane Another tidbit
      "“Interestingly the YF-22 and YF-23 had exactly the same trimmed AoA of 60°. The YF-23 could do it without thrust vectoring" YF23 top speed is still classified...

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  4 года назад

      Thank you, working on the YF-23 video next!

    • @michaelstodovski2219
      @michaelstodovski2219 4 года назад +2

      @@covert0overt_810 The YF-23 honestly comes off as more of some sort of a *Special Operations* Aircraft than an Air Superiority one. (Next Gen Air Superiority being the whole point of the ATF program)
      The YF-23's extreme expenses could make it an absolutely unsuitable weapon for *Total War.* Even losing 1 or 2 would be a financial disaster for Military expenses. (As you could buy 2-3 Raptors instead or a whole wing of F-16's)
      If the F-22 Production was cut on less than 200 Fighters then the F-23 could have been cut at less than *50 Fighters* due to it's extreme expenses.
      Maybe if the USSR didnt colapse and mass produced their own Stealth Fighters in the 2000's things could have been diffirent.
      Both YF-22 and YF-23 could have been selected for *diffirent* roles.

    • @covert0overt_810
      @covert0overt_810 4 года назад +1

      @@michaelstodovski2219 I'm just glad they never trashed the prototypes, and we can enjoy them, albeit sitting in museums --- One of my faves since I was a kid.

  • @bleedulus
    @bleedulus Год назад

    Easily the most beautiful badass plane ever made.