Wasn't the problem already solved when you turned one random knob up and the other down? You already got a random variation each time, so why bother with the macros?
It was. And I came to that conclusion after I posted video hence the pinned comment by Projektor_music. Only 1 macro was necessary in this case, not 2.
No i mean, why the macro at all? If you want randomness, turn random up in one of the oscillators. Want less: turn it down a bit. You dont need a macro at all, right?
@@watsedhaene Because if you set OSC A and OSC B random to 0% and use FM from B, you can dial in the exact timbre by adjusting the Phase on OSC A. If I have random up on one of them, it will be a new phase value everytime I play a note and in this example, I didn't want that.
I think just 1 macro is enough as the only thing that matters IMO is the phase difference between the 2 oscilators
Yeah, I came to that conclusion after the actual video was uploaded too hahahaha
That sounds sweet indeed
Thank you =)
Nice one mate, Thanks for this one!
Wasn't the problem already solved when you turned one random knob up and the other down? You already got a random variation each time, so why bother with the macros?
It was. And I came to that conclusion after I posted video hence the pinned comment by Projektor_music.
Only 1 macro was necessary in this case, not 2.
No i mean, why the macro at all? If you want randomness, turn random up in one of the oscillators. Want less: turn it down a bit. You dont need a macro at all, right?
@@watsedhaene Because if you set OSC A and OSC B random to 0% and use FM from B, you can dial in the exact timbre by adjusting the Phase on OSC A.
If I have random up on one of them, it will be a new phase value everytime I play a note and in this example, I didn't want that.
nice i reconized this too :)