Great! This is so incredibly cool to see our legal history getting set CORRECT, even though it wasn´t always right. Right? Thanks to Amanda Tyler for presenting this ´tuff to obtain´ historical info. I want to read her book, and just only now knew of it.
Five thousand views only and just eight comments, sad. Information we should all know, and anyone can write their writ or a friend, without cost to them.
Thank you for your remarking at @19:16 that Jefferson was willing to compromise his principals in re: the " suspension clause" in order to win his personal battle with Aaron Burr . Lets just drink another case of fine French wine at a Monticello dinner party and consider ourself an exception to our own rules.
I would love to hear her critique of Thuraissigiam immigration case as it applies to the suspension clause. While listening to this, I began to think about the US treatment of the Native Americans and how, if at all, did US violate habeas when it involved itself in the removal of the Native populations and in general the Indian Resettlement Act. If anyone has any thoughts on either I invite you to comment.
We have stood up for very less decade after decade. As my old aunt used to say "Use it lose it." How are you to do that if you have never learned what "it"is?
Look at the root of the word justice, and lady justice, it's from the Roman pagan deity"Justitia (Latin iustitia) as Latin didn't have the letter "J". So, what do you mean by the word justice when you go into their so-called courts, which are in fact, administrative tribunals that resemble courts. When the Messiah walk this earth, the first Caesar Augusta Octavian rule the Roman empire, till the Messiah was fourteen, when his son Tiberius took over, well, Octavian worshipped" Justitia and his son Tiberius build the first temples to her, and that's what these so-called courts are a temple to her, so you certainly get justice there, and no truth. These places use evidence, and evidence isn't necessarily true is it? Evidence c.1300 "Appearances from which inferences may be drawn. Appearances can be incorrect and wrong and in reality, you are being deceived. Just look at the word " person," and how they use words to deceive you, the language they use is legalese and not English. Then delve into the definitions of words, and the meaning of the words they use, they will not tell you. They need you to answer for the legal fiction in all caps lettering that does conform to English as it's not correct grammar, if not grammatically correct it's babbling and not making sense. That's why at school your English teacher would correct your spelling and grammar to make head and tail of it, to try and understand what you are saying, they interpret what you have written. All isn't what it seems in their so-called courts, so to say justice delayed is justice denied, is a misnomer. They need your ignorant to convict yourselves by their mouth using their words. The answer to the legal fiction that the state creates, is walking the wide, broad path to destruction as the Bible teaches. Person (n.) Directly from the Latin persona "human being, person, personage a part in a drama an assumed character," originally " a mask, a false face," such as those of wood or clay covering the whole head worn by actors in later Roman theatre.
Thanks for not really getting to the issue....habeas corpus is about one of the most ancient of ancients of natural law which is...the accused has the right to face the accusser in an open forum....things cannot just be here say and gossip and complaints. Produce the body.
Great! This is so incredibly cool to see our legal history getting set CORRECT, even though it wasn´t always right. Right? Thanks to Amanda Tyler for presenting this ´tuff to obtain´ historical info. I want to read her book, and just only now knew of it.
Five thousand views only and just eight comments, sad.
Information we should all know, and anyone can write their writ or a friend, without cost to them.
Thank u 4 RUclips'ing this. I'm pro se working on extraordinary writ habeas corpus in JV to CA supreme court
A huge difference in suspension implementation to consider is term of king vs President.
Does anyone know if the English Habeas Corpus Act of 1679 still active in the United States today?
Thank you for your remarking at @19:16 that Jefferson was willing to compromise his principals in re: the " suspension clause" in order to win his personal battle with Aaron Burr . Lets just drink another case of fine French wine at a Monticello dinner party and consider ourself an exception to our own rules.
I would love to hear her critique of Thuraissigiam immigration case as it applies to the suspension clause. While listening to this, I began to think about the US treatment of the Native Americans and how, if at all, did US violate habeas when it involved itself in the removal of the Native populations and in general the Indian Resettlement Act. If anyone has any thoughts on either I invite you to comment.
We have stood up for very less decade after decade. As my old aunt used to say "Use it lose it." How are you to do that if you have never learned what "it"is?
Justice delayed is justice denied
Look at the root of the word justice, and lady justice, it's from the Roman pagan deity"Justitia (Latin iustitia) as Latin didn't have the letter "J".
So, what do you mean by the word justice when you go into their so-called courts, which are in fact, administrative tribunals that resemble courts.
When the Messiah walk this earth, the first Caesar Augusta Octavian rule the Roman empire, till the Messiah was fourteen, when his son Tiberius took over, well, Octavian worshipped" Justitia and his son Tiberius build the first temples to her, and that's what these so-called courts are a temple to her, so you certainly get justice there, and no truth.
These places use evidence, and evidence isn't necessarily true is it?
Evidence c.1300 "Appearances from which inferences may be drawn.
Appearances can be incorrect and wrong and in reality, you are being deceived.
Just look at the word " person," and how they use words to deceive you, the language they use is legalese and not English.
Then delve into the definitions of words, and the meaning of the words they use, they will not tell you. They need you to answer for the legal fiction in all caps lettering that does conform to English as it's not correct grammar, if not grammatically correct it's babbling and not making sense. That's why at school your English teacher would correct your spelling and grammar to make head and tail of it, to try and understand what you are saying, they interpret what you have written.
All isn't what it seems in their so-called courts, so to say justice delayed is justice denied, is a misnomer.
They need your ignorant to convict yourselves by their mouth using their words.
The answer to the legal fiction that the state creates, is walking the wide, broad path to destruction as the Bible teaches.
Person (n.) Directly from the Latin persona "human being, person, personage a part in a drama an assumed character," originally " a mask, a false face," such as those of wood or clay covering the whole head worn by actors in later Roman theatre.
My second grade teacher use heabus corpus on me as black magic
Thanks for not really getting to the issue....habeas corpus is about one of the most ancient of ancients of natural law which is...the accused has the right to face the accusser in an open forum....things cannot just be here say and gossip and complaints. Produce the body.