넓적다리를 높히올려 껑충껑충 뛰어서 보폭을 늘리는 것이 아니고, 착지된 발로 지면을 힘차게 밀어 전방으로 도약한 후 다시 착지준비동작으로 돌아오는 것으로, 도약으로 인해 체공시간이 늘어나는 것이예요. 다리를 높히 들어올리는 것이 아니라 도약으로 자연스럽게 높아진 다리가 다음 착지동작으로 돌아오는 것으로 이때는 힘이 들어가지 않아요
+Aaron tewelde how tall you are most definitely plays a part in how long your stride is. a tall person won't ALWAYS have a longer stride, but if you were to compare 1000 runners by how tall they were and their stride length, you'd definitely see the correlation
It's more to do with cadence, having a faster cadence results in smaller strides. If a 5 foot and 6 foot person both run the same time with the same cadence, then they have the same stride length.
Loppy2345 It's cadence and stride length. Elite runners, even short ones, in races usually have above 180 cadence, and around 2m stride. Try to run with 2m strides- not easy.
@@roel5591 LOL. It's been a few years but I do stand corrected. You're right that height is correlated with stride length. Taller people can generate more power since their longer legs give them more leverage. Different runners just adopt different combinations of stride length and cadence
Quitted heel striking couple years ago, and now heel striking is not comfortable, i rather land on the ball of my foot, with my rebels v2, or speeds or invincibles, even a pair of minimalist whitins on 6k run and absolutely love them, im thinking on getting xero shoes hfs or vivo primus lite III, just dont need and havent decided yet
His success is not because of forefoot striking. Pete Jacobs is a triathlete who is an excellent runner, and he has a heelstrike and a very efficient style. Heelstrike or forefoot strike, the initial contact with the ground is always a braking effect. Once people understand this, they will see that forefoot striking offers no advantage.
Nic Browne this is certainly not slow. i don't know how fast, but he engages all parts of his body in a manner he would in a race, too. but even when guys like him run slowly, it is not very different from their race speed in terms of mechanics. their slow paces would be fast for many, maybe most, recreational runners, and they try to keep very good form at all paces - so their bodies do not even learn it the wrong way.
At roughly 4min 40-45sec per mile Haile used to hold the best times for the 10,000m (10k) and Marathon, so his average pace for the 26.2miles was around 4min 40sec. Even though he was a short athlete, he has an amazing stride length, able to cover ground extremely quickly.
Not exactly. The ideal is to land on your toes/forefoot. This actually cushions and softens the blow to your shins and legs than if you landed midfoot.
Yes, the best way to run is with low impact and hence forefoot running. Heelstrike gives a significant impact which is why it is generally ineffective at higher speeds. High impact leads to injuries
Erik Jonsson Last year I retired from all distance running activities following repeat injuries. On Sunday I cleared a hilly 10k only 38 seconds behind my previous record (while nursing a meniscus tear), only training I did was watch the above and try to copy his gait. DC
DaveC Sounds great! I'm currently recovering from overtraining syndrome. I'm finally (after about 1 month) starting to get better and better. Will only do low intensive training this month, and be very careful in the times ahead. The good thing is I know exactly what I did wrong: too many sprints added to a very high volume of training.
Update... nearly 3 minutes cut from previous 10k best. Took days to recover, but, making gains in my 40's. I think with a bit of experiment you become a bit more sensitised to the body's signals and adjust accordingly. I'm cranking it up a little with a view to doing a triathlon next year, it is difficult to get the body used to that amount of work but the experiment continues! DC
I've not suffered any significant injuries in years of running. Running is an activity I have enjoyed most of my life. I think I have a good running style, and am not going to change it. I take quite long consistent strides, and it works well for me. I don't even think about how I am landing most of the time, however for the purposes of this video I analysed my style, and I for the most part strike with my heel first. I have a very relaxed running style, and have often beaten other competitors to the finish starting a relaxed sprint a few hundred metres out and just holding a relaxed style of long strides. One thing I learnt early in my running when I was training for the 100, 200 and 400m is that sprinting is and running in general is actually more about maintaining your speed rather than continual acceleration. Even in a 100m race, top speed is not reached at the end of the race, the runner reaches top speed at just 50m. From this point onwards it becomes a situation of maintaining that speed. The runner shifts their body to an upright position which is more efficient for the maintenance of speed. Once someone understands this concept, they will understand why this forefoot striking garbage is no advantage. The success of some of these African runners far better explained in other ways. 1) Doping. 2) A physique suited to long distance running 3) A culture of running as a means of escaping poverty.
the reason you're not injuring yourself is because you're not running 200 miles per week like these people. A good stride is simple, your maximum impact should be exactly below your center of mass. If you look at top marathon runners this is what they do. They dont overpronate and they don't heelstrike.
curious how this got so international, being from a korean television. without wanting to degrade korean TV, its typical korean TV. i dont like this eather^^
If you notice, tendon and calf injuries are common in a couple of these Ethiopians who try and run on the front of their foot. From an injury point of view, you are much better off with a heal first landing. The Kenyans who are less frequently injured all run with a heal first landing. I think it's up to the individual, but I would not adopt a forefoot landing in the hopes of improving performance, it will just make one more prone to tendon and calf injuries.
Peter Stone Most elite runners, including Kenyans, are forefoot runners, not hill strikers. The natural way to run is forefoot. Try to hill-strike on hard surface barefoot, it hurts. You would switch to forefoot
If you watch Dennis Kimetto who is the current world record holder in the marathon, he has a regular heel first running style. I challenge you that the top Kenyan runners are forefoot strikers. Name a top kenyan marathoner who is a forefoot striker. I've watched many top kenyan runners place in the Marathon, and NONE of them use the forefoot striking first running style. It's an unusual style, and not one I will be adopting. By "hill- strike" I am guessing you meant heel strike..
Peter Stone Injuries can happen in both Running forms, and regardless of the technique, elites have more injuries because they push themselves to the limit, not because a specific technique. When walking we are designed to strike the ground with the heel first, however when running the foot is designed to take the impact on the ball of the foot with a slightly bent knee, resulting a softer impact yet springier. The foot and calf function as a spring. Look how little kids run, the smaller ages- 3-6, they land on the ball of the foot. It is assumed that some of us later when growing up start heelstriking because of high heel cushioned shoes. Try to run on a hard surface barefoot- automatically you would switch to land on the ball of your foot, because heelstriking would be just painful.
Look here how Kipchoge foot hits the ground. He's a Kenyan. www.iaaf.org/news/press-release/world-records-ratified-murto-aguilar-biwott-k Here on the track with spikes nicerunningday.tumblr.com/image/65122947147
+עידו נווה Hardly a forefoot striking first. All the weight is going on the heel. It's flat foot at best, even the track one. In the marathon he is clearly heel first. Heel first is the natural style. you even said yourself you started heel first. I certainly won't be changing my style.
What surprises me is the clarity of the video as if it was just yesterday.
Hail the GOAT 🙌
very good shooting angle, learn a lot from this
넓적다리를 높히올려 껑충껑충 뛰어서 보폭을 늘리는 것이 아니고, 착지된 발로 지면을 힘차게 밀어 전방으로 도약한 후 다시 착지준비동작으로 돌아오는 것으로, 도약으로 인해 체공시간이 늘어나는 것이예요. 다리를 높히 들어올리는 것이 아니라 도약으로 자연스럽게 높아진 다리가 다음 착지동작으로 돌아오는 것으로 이때는 힘이 들어가지 않아요
knee breaking sound effects disturbing...lol
And that destroys the myth that taller people have longer strides. Its not about how tall you are, its about how much power you can generate
+Aaron tewelde how tall you are most definitely plays a part in how long your stride is. a tall person won't ALWAYS have a longer stride, but if you were to compare 1000 runners by how tall they were and their stride length, you'd definitely see the correlation
It's more to do with cadence, having a faster cadence results in smaller strides. If a 5 foot and 6 foot person both run the same time with the same cadence, then they have the same stride length.
Loppy2345
It's cadence and stride length. Elite runners, even short ones, in races usually have above 180 cadence, and around 2m stride. Try to run with 2m strides- not easy.
@sdf dsf true! But greater amount of muscle contracting will require higher VO2
@@roel5591 LOL. It's been a few years but I do stand corrected. You're right that height is correlated with stride length. Taller people can generate more power since their longer legs give them more leverage. Different runners just adopt different combinations of stride length and cadence
Quitted heel striking couple years ago, and now heel striking is not comfortable, i rather land on the ball of my foot, with my rebels v2, or speeds or invincibles, even a pair of minimalist whitins on 6k run and absolutely love them, im thinking on getting xero shoes hfs or vivo primus lite III, just dont need and havent decided yet
Great ...
Hello, I need to know the speed of the video ?
Anyone can help me ?
thx
Gebrshilashe runniru wakarimashtai. Gebrshilashe leggu hitturu roadu withu quadu thunderu.
Красиво, почти как я😂
What documentary is this from? I'd like to watch the whole thing.
His success is not because of forefoot striking. Pete Jacobs is a triathlete who is an excellent runner, and he has a heelstrike and a very efficient style. Heelstrike or forefoot strike, the initial contact with the ground is always a braking effect. Once people understand this, they will see that forefoot striking offers no advantage.
Peter Stone that wasn’t my question.
ruclips.net/video/yrQW5KVijSI/видео.html
Do you know how fast he's running? Marathon / Half / 10k pace?
he is forefoot striker
that originated from the Barefoot running
Use the Achilles tendon and calf muscles like a spring
You aint got google dude?
How fast is he running in the video. The speed you run alters your foot strike and biomechanics...
Nic Browne this is certainly not slow. i don't know how fast, but he engages all parts of his body in a manner he would in a race, too. but even when guys like him run slowly, it is not very different from their race speed in terms of mechanics. their slow paces would be fast for many, maybe most, recreational runners, and they try to keep very good form at all paces - so their bodies do not even learn it the wrong way.
At roughly 4min 40-45sec per mile
Haile used to hold the best times for the 10,000m (10k) and Marathon, so his average pace for the 26.2miles was around 4min 40sec.
Even though he was a short athlete, he has an amazing stride length, able to cover ground extremely quickly.
Yep
notice running on forefoot
Nice
Ok
Mere mortals landing on forefoot like Gebrselassie would end up with with shin splints.
Not exactly. The ideal is to land on your toes/forefoot. This actually cushions and softens the blow to your shins and legs than if you landed midfoot.
Yes, the best way to run is with low impact and hence forefoot running.
Heelstrike gives a significant impact which is why it is generally ineffective at higher speeds. High impact leads to injuries
Erik Jonsson Last year I retired from all distance running activities following repeat injuries. On Sunday I cleared a hilly 10k only 38 seconds behind my previous record (while nursing a meniscus tear), only training I did was watch the above and try to copy his gait. DC
DaveC
Sounds great! I'm currently recovering from overtraining syndrome. I'm finally (after about 1 month) starting to get better and better. Will only do low intensive training this month, and be very careful in the times ahead.
The good thing is I know exactly what I did wrong: too many sprints added to a very high volume of training.
Update... nearly 3 minutes cut from previous 10k best. Took days to recover, but, making gains in my 40's. I think with a bit of experiment you become a bit more sensitised to the body's signals and adjust accordingly. I'm cranking it up a little with a view to doing a triathlon next year, it is difficult to get the body used to that amount of work but the experiment continues! DC
I've not suffered any significant injuries in years of running. Running is an activity I have enjoyed most of my life. I think I have a good running style, and am not going to change it. I take quite long consistent strides, and it works well for me. I don't even think about how I am landing most of the time, however for the purposes of this video I analysed my style, and I for the most part strike with my heel first. I have a very relaxed running style, and have often beaten other competitors to the finish starting a relaxed sprint a few hundred metres out and just holding a relaxed style of long strides. One thing I learnt early in my running when I was training for the 100, 200 and 400m is that sprinting is and running in general is actually more about maintaining your speed rather than continual acceleration. Even in a 100m race, top speed is not reached at the end of the race, the runner reaches top speed at just 50m. From this point onwards it becomes a situation of maintaining that speed. The runner shifts their body to an upright position which is more efficient for the maintenance of speed. Once someone understands this concept, they will understand why this forefoot striking garbage is no advantage. The success of some of these African runners far better explained in other ways. 1) Doping. 2) A physique suited to long distance running 3) A culture of running as a means of escaping poverty.
Peter Stone he's not African and you aren't a distance runner. you need to read a book or a study at that
Joseph Kubiak Haile is African. He's from Ethiopia.
Peter Stone nice try liar.
the reason you're not injuring yourself is because you're not running 200 miles per week like these people. A good stride is simple, your maximum impact should be exactly below your center of mass. If you look at top marathon runners this is what they do. They dont overpronate and they don't heelstrike.
Did they really have to add in those horrible sound effects :/
curious how this got so international, being from a korean television.
without wanting to degrade korean TV, its typical korean TV. i dont like this eather^^
Haile is very popular. Any video with his name in it will be found.
Alto hongo en la uña
hahaha
fucken vet
no kimchi
english please
If you notice, tendon and calf injuries are common in a couple of these Ethiopians who try and run on the front of their foot. From an injury point of view, you are much better off with a heal first landing. The Kenyans who are less frequently injured all run with a heal first landing. I think it's up to the individual, but I would not adopt a forefoot landing in the hopes of improving performance, it will just make one more prone to tendon and calf injuries.
Peter Stone
Most elite runners, including Kenyans, are forefoot runners, not hill strikers. The natural way to run is forefoot. Try to hill-strike on hard surface barefoot, it hurts. You would switch to forefoot
If you watch Dennis Kimetto who is the current world record holder in the marathon, he has a regular heel first running style. I challenge you that the top Kenyan runners are forefoot strikers. Name a top kenyan marathoner who is a forefoot striker. I've watched many top kenyan runners place in the Marathon, and NONE of them use the forefoot striking first running style. It's an unusual style, and not one I will be adopting. By "hill- strike" I am guessing you meant heel strike..
Peter Stone
Injuries can happen in both Running forms, and regardless of the technique, elites have more injuries because they push themselves to the limit, not because a specific technique.
When walking we are designed to strike the ground with the heel first, however when running the foot is designed to take the impact on the ball of the foot with a slightly bent knee, resulting a softer impact yet springier. The foot and calf function as a spring. Look how little kids run, the smaller ages- 3-6, they land on the ball of the foot. It is assumed that some of us later when growing up start heelstriking because of high heel cushioned shoes. Try to run on a hard surface barefoot- automatically you would switch to land on the ball of your foot, because heelstriking would be just painful.
Look here how Kipchoge foot hits the ground. He's a Kenyan.
www.iaaf.org/news/press-release/world-records-ratified-murto-aguilar-biwott-k
Here on the track with spikes
nicerunningday.tumblr.com/image/65122947147
+עידו נווה Hardly a forefoot striking first. All the weight is going on the heel. It's flat foot at best, even the track one. In the marathon he is clearly heel first. Heel first is the natural style. you even said yourself you started heel first. I certainly won't be changing my style.