Greatest Sacrifices in Chess History: Lecture by GM Ben Finegold
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 окт 2024
- GM Ben Finegold lectures on the greatest sacrifices in chess history.
This lecture was recorded on February 19, 2024 in Roswell, Georgia. This video is sponsored by Chris Stonestreet (aka Stonemeister1968) and the MHS Chess Club.
01:35 Stepan Levitsky vs Frank Marshall, DSB Kongress 1912
06:30 Edward Lasker vs George Thomas, London 1912
11:12 Roel Yumol vs Ben Finegold, New York Open 1994
15:55 Richard Réti vs Savielly Tartakower, Vienna 1910
21:16 Mikhail Tal vs NN, USSR 1963
24:43 Joerg Reinisch vs Karel Traxler, Hostouň 1890
29:32 Donald Byrne vs Bobby Fischer, Rosenwald 1956
36:06 Magnus Carlsen vs Sergey Karjakin, World Championship 2016
If you're interested in sponsoring a lecture of your choice, email Karen at karen@atlchessclub.com
Check out Ben's Chessable courses here! www.chessable....
Signup or gift a chess.com Premium membership to get access to their lessons, remove ads, improve your chess, AND help Ben at the same time!! Upgrade your chess.com membership or join! - go.chess.com/fi....
Buy Merch today! ccscatlmerch.com/
Watch live at / itsbenandkaren
Donations are appreciated at: streamlabs.com...
Follow me on Twitter: / ben_finegold
#benfinegold #chess #chesssacrifice
![Who Wrote a Short Story That Seriously Disturbed a Teacher? | Dirty Laundry x Smosh [Full Episode]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bvHAy_rKoEI/mqdefault.jpg)
Whenever I hear "I'm Grand Master Ben Finegold" I expect to hear "... and you are not"
I am Grandmaster Ben Finegold. Except for one thing.
It's ingrained in my brain.. Thanks Grand Master Ben Finegold!
are you?
You are very suspicious 😂
Nein!!
"And, in 1912, the engines were terrible. Even the ones in the cars. (Terrible...)" (10:52)
We need to add this to the Ben Finegold classics on page 1634.
Is this preparation or just a spur-of-the moment comment?
@@sar14cos sadly just a spur-of-the-moment comment
10:00 According to Ben's philosophy Ke2 requires less energy than 0-0-0, so it's better.
I haven't watched yet, but I'm glad we're getting more lectures focused on Tal.
The first time I saw the Edward Lasker game, many decades ago I wondered why he didn't mate by playing O-O-O# but I guess that was a gesture of respect in not wanting to mate George Thomas the most fancy way possible. There is also one famous Morphy game that ended with O-O#. But thanks to Ed Lasker's decision to play Kd2# I've still never seen a game that ended with O-O-O#!
When I first met Ed Lasker (at the Marshall Chess Club) he was in his 90s and although he was the famous chess player in the room that night he struck me as being a very humble and unassuming man. By then although still a pretty strong player, Ed Lasker was far from being the player he had been in his prime. But he was still pretty active in chess and still played for the love of the game very unlike most strong players who retire from chess when they are no longer near their peek strength.
Fun lecture! Thank you, Stonemeister1968
I feel bad for NN. Poor guy can never catch a break.
The truth hurts.
One day there will be a Greatest Games of NN lecture, spanning the centuries.
Greatest player of the past, present, and future. Except for one thing.
'Throughout the centuries getting crushed'
I pointed this out the last time the Lasker game was shown- Ke2# is probably more uncommon than 0-0-0#
Yeah mating with a king move almost sounds illegal
You should do a lecture on games that NN won
If NN won we would know their name
haha shortest lecture ever
He does have some, but most are against himself
Bd3 in the traxler game was a statement.
Thoroughly enjoyed this lecture.. thanks .. looking forward to future ones
goatee looking good big Ben! Thanks for all of these lectures.
That is so cool! As in a last couple of days I made my first sac's in a daily games!
You are the Best, mr. GM Finegold!
Tal Baron brings back memories for me, that was my first chess drama, lol. I used to watch his videos with Hutch, that was some of the first chess content I got into online. I thought he got banned from lichess as well, but it's been a long time. Anyway, great lecture as always Ben.
I've seen Qg3 for the 20th time, and I still love it. Absolutely love it.
Thank you meister and Ben!
Very good video with brilliant games.
On my opinion the greatest sacrifice game is : Lev Milman vs Joseph Fang
7th Foxwoods Open (2005), Mashantucket, CT USA, rd 6, Mar-26
Wonderful lecture! Thanks Ben.
Great video, Ben
Sad Nezhmetdinov`s Qxf6 didn't make the cut, great lecture though
Terrible engines around 1912 were the main reason that Kramnik never lost in this aera. And of course that he wasn't born that time. Both of the reasons completely confusing several audiences ...
Great lecture - loved this one.
that was really enjoyable. Thank you.
Lovely lecture Ben
Phenomenal stuff!
John van Baarle vs Jaap Piket 1969. Double Queen Sacrifice by John.
When I read Yasser's books as a kid, I learned about Frank Marshall. Apparently, his play was a bit suspicious, but he was a clever fighter and would often swindle his way back into the game by some ingenious sacrifice. His play was unsound but he was quite the artist over the board.
He wouldn't be very good in this era where you really need to calculate accurately and unsound play gets punished a lot, but he'd still be very entertaining.
Great Video
Nice lecture, thanks Ben!
In the Réti - Tartakower game my guess is that when Tartakower blundered with ...Nxe4 he didn't see that he was getting mated two ways starting with Qd8+! As Grandmaster Finegold says Tartakower should have been more suspicious when Réti "allowed" him to play ...Nxe4?? But I guess he thought Réti had "missed" the fact that after Qd8+ ...Kxd8 Bg5+ he didn't have to play ...Ke8 and thought he could play ...Kc7. It's still pretty surprising to me though that he Tartakower missed Bd8# even in 1910.
Today I learned that all pieces are technically overworked. Except for a and h pawns. a and h pawns are slackers
George Thomas was a good sport for letting his king get walked all the way across the board instead of conceding at some point
Hey Ben I wish you would make a video about Jakov Borisovitj Estrin, the man who wrote a book about the Traxler-gambit and a book about gambits in general. It is from him I have the lines in the Nezhmetdinov-gambit which no one have heard of, except me and Estrin himself.
I must be playing Grand Theft Auto, because I see someone Karjakin.
New Lecture !
27:30 That's a hell of a mouse slip > < Not sure he'll recover.
Edit: OH DAMN
Go Ben!
Where was the Isaac gambit? Abraham was crushing with it in the 1200s BC
tal vs NN never gets old for me
quick question: Will this be on the final?
One question: Is this particular Traxler game the reason this opening was named after him?
Kind regards
Qh6 by Magnus is that part of a Tex Avery cartoon where the guy's eyes fly out on stalks and a klaxon goes off while he hits himself over the head with a mallet
29:21 Beliavsky actually had the black pieces in that Traxler game against Anand, Linares 1991
Jan Gustafsson and Peter Svidler found that Carlsen mate, without the engine !
Yeah but they're real top 100 players in the world. Svidler was probably still top ~10 in 2016. Tal Baron peaked at 2560
10:00 he didn't have a queen, so he thought he should move his king to the center for the endgame
Definitely the Magnus Queen sacrifice to end the World Championship was the perfect example of elegant-minimalist-Magnus
Actually, though, my favorite game in which Magnus sacrifices a queen is the one against Giri at the Meltwater CCT Finals 2021 ... in That one, Magnus sacrifices his queen to be up 3 Pieces on Giri and he proceeds ultimately to surround his King with various pieces that kind of assemble and reassemble in various mutations as the Magnus Team kind of methodically makes it's way down the board triumphantly...
that would be the newer more aggressively-hyper-creative-Magnus
honestly That would make a great video too 😂
Man I like when Carlssen plays tactically instead of positionally. That queensacrifice against Karjakin was brilliant. I really wish Carlssen would play like Kasparov in his heydays, but still Carlssen is a great player. Probably more stable and solid than Kasparov, but that is also a little boring sometimes. ;)
Perhaps Kasparov was less stable and solid, but he has a much lower loss rate than Magnus, being the only player with less than 10% of games lost, topping even Morphy. Maybe Carlsen should consider playing less stably and solidly 😄
@@sebu1301 The reason I mentioned it, is because it would make Kasparov complete and no engine would be able to win against him. He would be like a chess-engine himself. In my view Kasparov was so strong that he could draw against an engine anytime. Him and Fischer is the strongest human chessplayers there have ever been so far. It is the only players where the topcomputers agree on their moves. With Fischer it is amazing because he did it in a time where there were no computers. With Kasparov it is amazing because he could compete with the engines for so long, before he was defeated by an engine. But I also think they were unfair against Kasparov. He wasn´t allowed to have a look into the mind of the computer before he played them. Kramnik on the other hand was allowed to look into the opening-library of all the engines he has played before the matches so he could prepare.
9:10 If Kh8 then not only is Ng6 a checkmate but also a triple fork. Brutality!
Actually Ben, the only player I know who has check mated with castle is Morphy. I hope someday you would show us that game.
If I keep sacrificing my king most games, one day I’ll be in a Ben finegold video
What's the difference between checkmate and checkmate with advantage?
you had me at "Great"
This is a great video, except for one thing. No just kidding. Great video Ben, thank you. I love your content except for. Ah! I cant help myself😂!!!
Eric Rosen has mated after castling!!!
I like your content.
Paul Morphy checkmated his father by castling.
I hope NN will become World Champion someday
37:00 "Whoever won this game is world champion."
That's not quite true. Carlsen only needed a draw to win the tiebreak. If Karjakin had won the game the tiebreak would have continued.
reti vs tartakower was just a casual blitz too., so .. not just "they didn't know"
I long castled with checkmate once. There was pins everywhere it was pure evil 😂
This is one of the videos I saw today. 😂
feel like there needs to be some Creed in the background for some reason
Zeroeth
Frankly, interesting
Always sac the exchange baby!
If i should choose a lesson to sponsor, i would get a lesson in games that f3/f6 were a brilliance😅
Ben's greatest sacrifice: having to analyze the games of his subscribers, also known as the gawking rabble. There's good and there's not good, and then there's viewer submitted games.
Tal sacrificed so hard he took that guy's name
missing the morphy v paulsen queen sac but otherwise great vid
Rarely a good idea to play into an opening that's named after your opponent. Very suspicious.
No shirov bh3?
9:38 It would be cruel to play Kd2 in this position
Of course Tal Baron didn't use an engine; that would be cheating. 😁
when you're in double check, you have to move. Unless you're a grandmaster
My feeling is that there definitely will be at least 1 "Aaaaahh" with his hands in the air pretending to be a kid who is wrong
I was mistaken - but not disappointed
Why would you prefer 0-0-0# over Kd2# ? That's just more work when setting up for the next game. Terrible!
Tal. He's a boy, isnt he? I want to play like that. Happily for my opponents, I try to.
Lasker must have mouse slipped
ben's sacrifice was denied, so it was more like a 'struggle'.. his 'mein kampf', if you will.
Tal vs NN lol
That's not why nobody knows about it
Magnus is a great Swedish, not a great Finnish.
22:32 Missed a golden opportunity to say 'Tal Time".
[??] Terrible
Ben's greatest sacrefice was in 94... No wonder he was married 3 times.... JK
Did you pluck your eyebrows?