Thanks for the lecture. One question here, does abstract noun fall under noun classes or treated differently? This is because only proper, common and pronouns were mentioned as classifications of a noun. Thank you.
I'm a year late but I think it's because recommended is a participle (a verb functioning as an adjective) and the "often" in 'often quoted' is a time adverbial
@@consumopersonal2900 Thanks for the response! No problem with timing! I still don’t get it. “recommended” and “often quoted” both are participial clauses; “often” is an adverbial modifier of the participle “quoted”; it could also be “often recommended”, “never recommended”, “always recommended” etc. In any case, we deal with an adverb modifying a participle, and a participle modifying a noun. I just can’t see any qualitative difference between “often quoted book” and “recommended book” or “never recommended book” and “stupidly quoted book”, besides the constructional complexity of the participial component per se; it is something quantitative and does not seem to concern the relation between the participial modifier and the noun.
What is the construction "In England, there was a king who had a beard." (In ... there was ...) called? What are its constituent parts? I can't figure this one out.
I wish I could’ve watched this video 6 years ago
Great!
Hello.
At the first of all. Thank you for this explain. I hope you will send it for me in a pdf if you can.
Thank you so much from morroco
is there any reference of the structure of noun phrase?
yes sir. I am coming again
Thank you sir
Thanks a million, this really helpful. You are the best.
Thank you, this really helped. I am trying to understand this, it seemed very complicated until now.
Thanks for the lecture. One question here, does abstract noun fall under noun classes or treated differently? This is because only proper, common and pronouns were mentioned as classifications of a noun. Thank you.
Abstract nouns fall under common nouns. They are a subset of common nouns and they have no syntactical differences from any other common nouns.
1st noun phrase:head word premodifierpostmodifier prapositional phrase.2nd noun phrase:Headwordpostmodifier prepositional phrase 3rd phrase headword4th phrase: headwordpremodifier is it right?
sir wonderful lecture thank you so much
thank you this was very usefull
Extremely useful, thank you sir. I just want to ask if you may ,teacher, explain the verb phrase in syntax way as well.
Thank you to help me a lot I will practice that too much. I had confusing in this subject . I hope you have a great life
It's really very fruitful lectures. Thanks a million
this is so well comprehended.
thank you.
Sir, you are great for human contribution.
⚘⚘⚘⚘⚘
Thank you :)
👍
Happy New Year! Could you further explain that in 12:13? Why “often quoted” is different from “recommended”?
I'm a year late but I think it's because recommended is a participle (a verb functioning as an adjective) and the "often" in 'often quoted' is a time adverbial
@@consumopersonal2900 Thanks for the response! No problem with timing! I still don’t get it. “recommended” and “often quoted” both are participial clauses; “often” is an adverbial modifier of the participle “quoted”; it could also be “often recommended”, “never recommended”, “always recommended” etc. In any case, we deal with an adverb modifying a participle, and a participle modifying a noun. I just can’t see any qualitative difference between “often quoted book” and “recommended book” or “never recommended book” and “stupidly quoted book”, besides the constructional complexity of the participial component per se; it is something quantitative and does not seem to concern the relation between the participial modifier and the noun.
@@sot11cat You're right, and you seem to know a lot more than I do! I'm just starting learning grammar, and it's kicking my ass lol
@@consumopersonal2900 You shouldn’t underestimate yourself my friend! 😉
What is the construction "In England, there was a king who had a beard." (In ... there was ...) called? What are its constituent parts? I can't figure this one out.
In England (Adverbial preposition modifying the independent clause) - There was (form of 'be' verb) = a king. I believe this is correct.
Check out this video, Bon Bon, it is extremely informative: ruclips.net/video/hK9jxmiMiLo/видео.html . Good luck!
@@smff8846 a king is a subject and there is adv of place.We call inversion sentence
Excellent, it has been of great help!!!