Arranger Keyboard vs Synthesizer Workstation - Review & Demo
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 мар 2022
- Helpful advice and buying guide for choosing between an ARRANGER KEYBOARD (Yamaha PSR, Tyros, Genos etc) and SYNTHESIZER WORKSTATION (Yamaha Montage, Roland Fantrom etc).
Including lots of music demos, plus review of the pros and cons of each instrument category.
Featured instruments -
Arranger:
► YAMAHA PSR S970
► YAMAHA PSR SX900
► KORG i3
Synth:
► YAMAHA MODX
► YAMAHA MOTIF XF
► KORG NAUTILUS
► KORG KROSS 2
► WRITTEN ARTICLE
woodypianoshack.com/category/...
MORE WOODY PIANO SHACK
► PATREON bit.ly/woody_patreon
► CHANNEL MEMBERSHIP bit.ly/join_wps
► WEBSITE woodypianoshack.com
► PIANO INSPIRATION SERIES bit.ly/inspiration_welcome
► SUPPORT bit.ly/wps_support
► CHAT bit.ly/discord_woody
► TWITTER / woodypianoshack
► INSTAGRAM / woodypianoshack
► FACEBOOK / woodypianoshack
► TWITCH / woodypianoshack
► MUSIC woodypianoshack.bandcamp.com 
Видеоклипы
There's one group of people who always seem to get overlooked. That's people who play other instruments. As a guitarist, I have an arranger keyboard as a practice tool and composition aid. It's useful for any musician to be able to play a keyboard even badly to understand musical relationships between notes even if you can't play at a performance level. I can record loops and basslines to play along with but someone really ought to invent an arranger footboard so I can change chords or get a fill on the fly.
Boss Sy1 pedal. Pair it with a looper and there you go.
Great point mate. Speaking as a keyboard/guitarist
Arrangers are ideal for one-man-band types of performance, whereas a synth is ideal as one instrument in a band. That’s really where the core difference exists.
that's a pretty good sum up right there.
I agree, Vanessa.
For myself, now being just a "home player" went with an Arrange to sit on top of my Yamaha HS4 organ.
I didn't want a synth since any synth stuff I need to do, the arranger has it and has a pretty good selection. Although, not easily adjustable like a real synth.
For home, it's the Arranger for this guy. LOL
And speaking of Arrangers, that Yamaha Genos is something else.
But, it's now got some major competition with Korg's new Pa5X. And this bad boy can do some amazing synth stuff too.
@@BlondieSL The Genos is really top of the line. Too bad it doesn’t come in an 88-key weighted version.
good job you watched the video
Fine review, thanks
Oo, this one is gonna be fun! I love videos comparing the differences between things in detail.
Ciao Woody!!! Thank you for this valuable video and information. I know nothing about pianos/keyboards. My 21 year old AUTISTIC step daughter, who can miraculously sing very well, is learning to play the keyboard. She's somehow, composed on her own 14 songs with melodies and chords on a Yamaha PSR6700 that my sister gave to me in the mid 1990s. I am thinking of buying my step daughter the latest Yamaha GENOS Arranger. It will cost me an arm and a leg with much sacrifice. But, after watching THIS video, I've made up my mind. Thank you and God Bless YOU for taking the time to teach us! I was going berserk watching countless videos talking about the GENOS, but after watching your video, it was clear that what my step daughter needs at this moment is an Arranger .
so glad I can help! yes, the genos is a small fortune, but remember you can get the same sounds and features in the SX900, for half the price, and with built-in speakers which your step daughter and family would appreciate I think.
It truly falls down to the needs of the player and style of music they play. Arrangers workstations have a major strongpoint, and that’s “out of the box” playability. Arranger players “statistically” tend to do less in-depth editing of patches/tones, and you’ll often find this reason is due to buyer demographic. Manufactures tend to cater to a specific age group with arrangers as well, and the data they collect shows “out of the box” playability is something this demographic wants. Synth Workstation players tend to be younger, and are likely to utilize the many editing features found on a workstation too, and it’s not to say only the young crowd buys these, but for every semi or pro arranger workstation sold to someone under the age of 35.., the synth workstation sales numbers more than triple that to the same age group. When it comes to song composition they BOTH are very good for song creation, and honestly in terms of simplicity, the arranger workstation is by far the easiest to work with due to the auto accomp, and the ability to create a style from scratch. Arranger workstations are primarily suited for more traditional styles of music too.., even though they can produce more modern music, the sequencer and sound palette are really best tailored for traditional styles. Workstations used to be all about electronica too., as I remember a time when if you wanted good quality acoustic instruments.., you bought an arranger workstation. That all has changed now, and synth workstations have high quality acoustic instruments, but still fall behind the arranger in terms of simplify for song creation in that area. I used to sell keyboards and pianos years ago (been playing for over 40 years myself). I’ve owned everything from budget to high end in both the arranger and synth workstation market. I would always tell people that if you like both types of keyboards, and want the best of both worlds.., then the Korg PA series is your best choice. Korg PA models are literally a hybrid workstation because of the amount of editing you can do. Even the Yamaha Genos doesn’t hold a candle to what the Korg can do in terms of detailed patch editing, sample editing, ect. A Korg MicroArranger has more detailed editing than a Genos.., that’s not an exaggeration either. If you can afford it., I feel owning both an arranger and synth workstation is ideal.
Agree with you on the Korg PA being a hybrid arranger workstation. I own a Yamaha arranger and wish to have the flexibility of assigning key and velocity zones on my parts. Short of buying a dedicated workstation keyboard, the Korg PA series has very comprehensive editing option.
I don't mind owning a second compact keyboard so I went with a Korg Kross.
What about sound quality arranger vs synth, which one better
@@PakBudiTarigan In my experience, if both are on the same price, the arranger usually has the better sound quality. For example between Yamaha MX61 and Yamaha PSR-SX600, the SX has better quality piano and acoustic instruments. Both are priced around $1000. The arranger also was recently released last year, while there's still no updated model for the 2012 MX61.
For Korg, the PA300 arranger sounds slightly better than the Kross (synth workstation) based on what I heard. Both are priced at around $900.
I'm mostly comparing acoustic instruments like piano and strings. If you're looking for synth sounds like pads and leads, I find synth workstations has way better quality and you can customize these too.
Korg arranger might have all the editing features but almost all the acoustic sounds on a korg sound like trash compared to any Yamaha in ita segment.
this was really great and entertaining! thank you. Also nice song at the end :D
Great to see you back woody! I was told, by my former keyboard and piano teacher, that a keyboard, has more control over backing styles rather than sounds, and the synths you have full control over sounds, and midi features. Workstations to me are a blank canvas you have the full world at your finger tips, with a very large sequencer and audio features, so you can built tracks from scratch etc, where with arranger you are sort of a one man band. I have owned a Arranger keyboard in the passed Technics Kn1000, and the sounds on that were fantastic. I now have a kurzweil kn2600 XS, that's used as a home piano, due to the cost and that i can load more pianos into it. All depends on what you want or need as you say, have the best of both worlds is where its at. Some synths don't have the sequencer just the sounds, so you can have an entry level on and a nice arranger on the stand with it. Id love to change my casios for two arrangers, Different sizes though, and have the kuzweil for piano. All have one thing in common, and that's they are bags of fun!
well said indeed!
Arrangers are meant for full arrangements, hard to do that on most synths. But synths usually give more sound shaping possibilities.
As of recently listening to Korg EK-50 & Yamaha PSR-E473 (both under €400) and do sound nice. On monitors via line outs they can sound as a sample based synthesizer.
They have come a long way, yet in this pricebracket is truly amazing!
Thank you. Your are a good reference to many questions That I have on keyboards
Fantastic Video Woody. When you look at the montage of clips it is amazing how many tunes, classical to rock , to cheese that you can play and solo on freely. I'm a synth man but I need to sharpen my skills drastically. (I'm trying hard). Great content. Thank you.
thank you, yeah, a lot of variety in the instruments and genres over this 6 years span!
Synthesizers are the electric equivalent of an acoustic instrument, arrangers usually imitate instruments (romplers) and that is a big difference. There are keyboards that combine both, but in my opinion, arrangers are overshadowed by PCs with DAWs,
Hey Woody! I just stopped in to say how much I enjoy your channel! You make everything enjoyable and clear 👍
I use a Korg PA4X76 Arranger for performing and as my sound engine. I connect a Novation 61SL Mk3 to it and combined it gives you the best of both worlds.
Thank you so much for your amazing videos!
hi, thanks for the message. and that sounds like a killer combo!
If you're old enough, you may remember when home organs like Lowrey and Wersi were all the rage. You would turn on the rhythm and play the melody with one finger while the organ chugged away doing fills and bass. They fell out of fashion, but arrangers are the compact versions of these dinosaurs. Real musicians looked at them with horror, and you will never see a music video with the keyboard player using a Lowrey organ--or a Genos, Tyros or PSR either. The only professional music case is people performing solo at places like Weddings, churches and restaurants, who need to be able to simulate a full band in real time to accompany them. But, in an actual band, these accompaniment features would be useless and and unnecessary.
So, If you're looking to play keyboard parts in a band, record individual tracks in a DAW or make your own sounds, than buy a synth/workstation. If you always play solo and need the instrument to simulate a band--whether at home or at a gig, than an arranger might fit your needs. Just get a good one, so it doesn't sound too cheap and cheesy. Ironically many professional and experienced musicians find arrangers difficult to play, as they are used to playing complex solo keyboard parts--not with controlling the instrument as it accompanies them through a song. Pianists especially dislike them as they keyboards are usually shortish and very light, whereas you can buy nicely weighted full 88-key workstations.
Couldn’t have said it better myself 👍🏼
As someone who plays arranger, I would tend to agree with you, for the most part. However, even Korg's newest flagship arranger now comes in an 88 key, weighted keyboard! I also would not be embarrassed to play an arranger keyboard in a band, but you are correct, no accompaniment tracks. But, this isn't what they are designed for, and the newer ones, for the one or two person groups, are most certainly up to the challenge. Look at the stuff from the new Korg PA5X.
Additional points raised in the comments and stuff I overlooked -
► Whilst many musicians dislike arranger styles, the general public absolutely lap it up (which is perhaps most important because we generally play for the public)
► Arrangers are fabulous for live performers like one-man-bands, troubadours, entertainers
► Arrangers have simpler operating systems, with clearer GUI and larger fonts
► Arrangers are better for ethnic and oriental music, with some models specializing in these styles
► Workstation synths are usually extremely complex, complicated and somewhat intimidating to use and program
I find it absolutely boring to play hits of the past note-by-note for a pensioners audience.
I see arrangers like fast food. It doesn't require a lot of technical knowledge and you can get started making music quickly. But it's hard to do in-depth editing beyond what you get in the box.
Workstations are like a homemade meal. It takes a lot more work and knowledge but you have full control of your food's flavor.
@@v3xman You say it.
I found arrangers indispensable for learning to play keyboard as an amateur home musician. I wasn't coming out of the gate as a newbie trying to shred prog rock lead solos so the arranger was perfect for learning chords and melodies from top 40 hits. The arranger is like the acoustic guitar for people who aren't guitar people.
@@modernmusician3346 Thanks to modern technology, more people than formerly find their way to making music. This is great.
Out of the frustration of sequencers short measure count, usually 4 or less, and lack of variety in time signatures and control, plus the awkward use of song mode to extend sequences.... I gave up trying to make them work for composing music. The pattern sequencers on arranger keyboards are the most powerful sequencers on the market. So I ended up buying an arranger just for the pattern sequencer, and then erasing the sequences and building my own from a blank. Then using MIDI outputs from the arranger I control other music devices in clock and notes. A single keyboard therefor cannot do the whole job of composing original music and sound design. No arrangers offer deep sound design or analog oscillator options, but through MIDI we can run synths, other groove boxes and samplers. So now I have an arranger as my centerpiece for MIDI clock and pattern sequencing, but most all other sound comes from my great sounding analog and digital synths/samplers/groove boxes. I can loop sequences as long as 32 measures, and of course the entire 8 track sequences can immediately follow a chord change with pitch. This chord change allows me complete freedom to improvise my custom pattern sequences in different progressions. The thrill of your own pattern sequences made specifically for each song creation is incredible. This type of composing through intense pattern sequencing, sound design, and effects design....then with the sequences complete....I unleash my creative spirit with any chord progression I desire and melody. Huge orchestrations are possible with hundreds of variables available through a studio of instruments all played on the fly and recorded in one take. (my organ skills of playing two handed and two footed, also helps immensely when performing on the fly).
Great comments ! I think you do what I wanted. I play jazz piano, but very often I need to play alone, and I would like to have a bass and drums.
Do you have suggestions for budget arrangers (I love weighted keys... but let's see)
@@marcosquitopianolounge6350 There is a new arranger reasonably priced at $700.00, it is the Medeli AKx10. It is 61 keys non-weighted (synth action) but has MIDI in and out 5pin. So if you have a digital piano with MIDI outputs (5pinDIN) then you can place the arranger on top your piano and control the arranger entirely from your piano. I have another channel where I did a video on this with a Korg MicroArranger and a 88weighted key Yamaha digital piano: ruclips.net/video/aS2cp7dGi-4/видео.html . The MicroArranger is a great arranger for about $500.00 but is out of production and will have to find one on the used market. After my suggested keyboards the price goes way up, with the next good arranger a Korg PA700 for about $1700.00. What I call good arrangers are the ones where you can edit the instruments and create your own style from a blank and has a good style creator operating system and display to make style creation easy as possible...and have MIDI in and outputs in 5pinDIN connectors. Without any editing controls for sound and style there are hundreds of choices, but the cheezy sound of most the styles would get old fast to a master keyboardist.
I have just given away my Medeli AKx10, there were many problems that I wrote to the company, but they did not fix any of them. So now my arranger that is working well is the Roland E-A7, but not that cheap. @@marcosquitopianolounge6350
A great video...a topic that's not often explained. Will be very helpful to those just starting out.
thanks james, i certainly hope it helps!
Great voice. You’re like David Attenborough. Your programs are so well made. Real documentaries.
The Genos has also lots of synths and pads sounds, with editing possibilities. And Arpeggiators
I have sx900 and mod x6 I have great fun on the 900 and I get more in the way of freedom to create on modx6 both fantastic yet totally different boards.
I have a Yamaha QY300 which I use to control all my synths as auto accompaniment when I play. That way I can kind of play all my synths at once, which is certainly fun. How do modern arrangers differ from Band in a Box or style player sequencers like the old QY series? I have plenty of synths, but I'm always interested in quick ways to generate full arrangements from my playing.
Great topic and your Opinion is spot on.
Thanks Woody 👍. Although I’m more ‘synth and drum machine’ oriented, it is nice to bring out my old Korg i30 or Roland E20 from time to time, for a bit of auto-accompaniment frivolity ! We left a Technics kX6500 I think it’s called, at the in-laws house in Europe, for use when we visit. I’ve flipped-flopped between different methods over the last 35 years to be honest. The ESQ1 took care of all my sequencing duties in the late 80s. Then Pro24 on the Atari. Then Cakewalk. Then back to workstations again when the Trinity came out in the mid 90s. Then I used a Korg M3 workstation until about 10 years ago, when I made a permanent switch across to Ableton (even though I have a MODX now). I am experimenting again with ‘old school’ methods, using a couple of old Alesis MMT8’s. Quite refreshing and nostalgic!
i would love to revisit an arranger from the 90s to see how they hold up today.
Man, this is one 'feel good' video! Thanks!
so glad to hear that, awesome!
Great overview, Woody - you hit all the important points. I'm a home player who loves arranger keyboards - They're fun, fast, and you don't have to have a whole band to sound good. I agree that they can sound cheesy, but lucky for me - I love cheese 😁
hi cindy, as i once said, one man's chesse is another man's yoghurt (or woman's, sorry!) :D the one point I should have emphasised is that whilst musicians sometimes hate the sound of arrangers and turn their nose up, the general public absolutely love it! and that's probably most important.
Hahah I don't know what cheesy sound is... but I had a PSR300... I have an idea...
Great video!
Nice video woody. Very informative. Thanks
I have used both types for many years, professionally and for fun. But synthesisers like the MODX are really on a different planet if you want to be original and truly creative, because you can almost infinitely vary the sounds, some of which are very impressive, especially when combined. Arranger keyboards are quite difficult to avoid sounding cheesy, even with careful playing. My MODX can with deft editing produce orchestral and other sounds that virtually match the most expensive sample libraries, but you also NEED to have a DAW (Cubase, Studio One, Logic etc) to get the best out of it.
Truly creative? That’s just elitism. It’s cool to have fun playing with sound, but that’s not more creative than playing with arrangements, it’s just a different type of creativity. The attention is focused on different aspects of music making.
Most creative are workstations. Genos is much better for studio than MODX. synthesizers are best for live performances with real bend. They have sound that is more advanced, go better through live space than arrangers that have round sound and design for playing with styles, more studio like sound.
Thanks Woody...I use a Modx8 with a Korg pa on one stand...and a Kronos LS with a Yamaha PSR on another stand...they all compliment one another.
I bet, what a killer rig!
I own both an arranger and a workstation. Both shine in different situations. When I'm gigging with a vocalist duo for a wedding and I'm the sole accompanist, my Yamaha arranger works best here. It makes me sound like a one man band.
When I'm with my other musician friends in an ensemble or band where I don't need the auto accompaniment and I want portability and weird noises, my Korg Kross does the job here.
excellent (and quite typical) usecase for the arranger right there!
Also the reason Arrangers are usually more plastic, is to make them lighter for lugging around. They can typically be 20lbs lighter than their workstation equivalents.
I don't agree fully on this. If you take the top dogs of both Korg and Yamaha Arrangers they are considerably more rugged constructed than the most common "Cheaper" synth models. But yes both the Yamaha Genos and the new Korg Pa5x is Extremely expensive, and the "Synth Workstation" is a dieing breed as the companies asume you are hooking it up to a computer anyway that with a DAW have much better editing than what you have on a socalled "Workstation". Only Korg and Kurzweil still makes Workstations. So in very few years the Workstation will propably be gone for good. Only the Arranger boards will have the ability to do everything without a computer, and then again you often need a computer program if you want to make your own custom sounds on those boards like the Genos that have onboard memory for loading user samples.
I have an old Yamaha P9000Pro which was a 76 key version of the PSR9000. And even it has plastic top, the base chassis is metal and the keybed is the same as in Yamaha's top synth models with aftertouch, and this has carried on ever since in the Tyros models and the Genos. They are practically just as sturdy as a Motif or Montage even the Tyros lina also had plastic top. Even the Pa5X have 76keys with aftertouch (which the Nautilus dont have). And to compare, a Modx have just as horrible a keybed as Yamahas intro PSR models.
The P9000 even had sampling and a simple loop editor onboard if you mounted 1-2 sticks of memory (max 32Mb).
Problem is who have 34.000 DKr for a Genos or 36.000 for a Pa5x. (3-5k) $ 😒 But they are lovely instruments and you can spent just as much time trying out arrangements and sounds as a Workstation. And the editing of sounds has become much deeper today compared to nearly nothing editable in the late 80's. Synths stil have more editing of the sounds tho
@@mrdali67 I guess you interpreted my post to mean I was saying Arrangers feel "cheaper", which is absolutely not the case.
I've had a couple. I've had ancient ones, like the PSR-800, and a couple of Korg ones, i3 (which was just an X3 with arranger function), Pa1X Pro (which was just a Triton with arranger function), and my current one, the Tyros 4 (a Motif in Arranger function). I've had the Tyros for over 10 years now, and it does NOT feel cheap. I loaded it up with 512mb ROM, and painstakingly loaded it up with my favorite sampled sounds from the M1, 01/W, SY99, Kurz PC2, etc etc.
When I used to play live, after the concerts, people used to come up to me to inspect this thing. They could not believe a "home" looking keyboard could sound so good.
So yeah, I never meant for it to sound that arrangers are "cheap". I've been tempted to get a Genos, but I don't play live anymore, and Tyros 4 still sounds pretty damn good for noodling around.
@@mrdali67 The 9000 Pro was the ONLY board I every played where the layered strings on piano were absolutely perfect. They didn't hang on and faded out just perfect while playing piano riffs. Amazing. Could never duplicate on any other board.
@@solojim Ya, many earlier multitimbral synths or arrangers just had a general damper pedal setting. It’s vital to be able to set damper on/off on different parts to make a usefull piano/strings stack sound. Think the psr 8000/9000 was the first arrangers to have that level of control of each sound part. I remember the last firmware of the 9000 was groundbreaking when you got the ability to split not just the lower-upper, but also the upper 1-2-3 into their own zone. Look at the p9000. For it’s time the Max 65Mb sample memory was pretty groundbreaking for its time, and today Yamaha squeezed the available sample memory of the Genos a bit in v. 2. Why are they making both the montage/Modx/Genos so close ended. Memory is so cheap today. Why not have a way of adding a 16-64gb memory board like they had with the memory boards for the Tyros/Motif line. Just about every Company does that today, Korg, Yamaha, Nord - which some users say listens to what custommers want still having just 1gb for the Piano / sample part. It would cost so little to add the posibilities of a memory upgrade and they would earn more selling those kits.
They serious need to up their game with synths today. Computers have used 64 bit OS’es for the most part of the last 2 decades. Korg never bothered recompiling their Oasys software to 64 bit. And most “hardware” boards are still limited with the same 32bit software that is limited to around 3.2gb adressing space. After all, just about everything today is software limited only. Only hardware limitations left today is cpu, memory and ammount of a/d/a i/o. Every thing else is just software and the fact if it runs on standard of the shelf components like the Kronos or some custom hardware.
Nice comparison 👏 👍
Love love LOVE this channel
Intro gave me Banjo Kazooie vibes. Awesome video!
If the CASIO MZ-X500 hadn't suffered from the weak CPU and the stale natural sounds and unreasonable decisions of the developers, it would have been the perfect hybrid between workstation and arranger.
But unfortunately the CPU couldn't keep up with the possibilities and there was no MIDI clock IN.
The concept was promising and exactly what I was looking for.
Up to 24 Layers of Sounds with accompeniments and arrangements, arpeggios and 16 programmable Pads.
Today I use a Korg Pa1000 and a Krome EX in parallel, and I still don't have all the options that the MZ-X500 had (velocity sensitive pads)
@@iannmiller AIX is nice but still away from other known brands. Casio really needs to put new, good and fresh recorded natural samples into their Keyboards.
They can do synthesizers, but natural sounds are still not good to compete with the 1000€ Class.
@@pcpanikMusik maybe you should try the CASIO WK-3300 ... If you edit the presets enough... Maybe you'd be surprised the quality of the sounds you can get.... It's a kind of synth there...
@@octavio-blues-sound3022 I have a Korg Pa1000 and a Krome EX. I don‘t think that a WK3300, which is a really old entry-level key, could be compared to them.
Great video
Sir, which is best to buy YAMAHA PSR 900 or YAMAHA MODX 8+ . i need different instruments sounds like electric bass guitar and electric guitar sounds , including acoustic guitar sounds, drums sounds and variety of different piano sounds mainly needed for one time investment and I could use it for 10 years for song writing and music creation . And i like to edit the music which i make in my MacBook using logic pro x.
Hi, I am planning on buying a keyboard and I am overwhelmed of what to choose between Korg i3 and Yamaha PSR EW425. Which should I choose in your perspective?
I owned th korg E 50 L and the Yamaha psr E- 473 that are quit good I just purchased the Yamaha SX 600 at really good price at Black Friday for around $430 new off course in Japan still waiting for it I saw many reviews on the SX 600 I really like it you think I did a deal to buy it !
Its nice to have both...
First I thought: "What a strange comparison!" But after watching your video I have to admit that it actually makes sense somehow for many people. You really nailed that unusual topic!
i'm not exaggerating when I say that it's a common question I get, always somewhat surprising.
@@WoodyPianoShack indeed! Amazing! Have a grest weekend!
Hi there thank you very much for your videos
what you recommend Korg PA 600 or Yamaha motif xf6 😅
oh yeah! you are such a skilled keyboardist woody! i really like the manhattan transfer do dah starting at 4'55'' - bang on!
oh you should see the performance blunders that never make it to the final video!! thanks anyway :D
arranger keyboards will get you started , help you play in time & develop your keyboard skills , if you're not an accomplished player.It's like playing with a backing band. But if you are intending to create your own arrangements , outside of the normal styles , then go for a synth/workstation. this has been my journey .
great points! keep in mind, you can create your own styles on the better arrangers too, so not limited to what yamaha or korg thinks is cool.
Thanks Woody. I just bought a psr-e473 from Yamaha. There is so much you can do with it. In the end it is how creative one is with limited resources. It has MIDI audio and is multi-timberal. Two DSP inserts. 820 sounds. What more could one ask for for $370
i've watched a few videos on that model and it looks amazing! would love to try one myself.
So amazing
I was having this conversation today with someone who (Like you) has a korg nautilus and why I chose not to buy the Montage 7. He says that it does everything and I that's not what I wanted. I said I prefer to have Sythersizors with a DAW as a Hub. On the Motage 7 you can do entire song or album just with the single unit with nothing else. The only single unit work station I'd be interested in would be a MPC Live2.
Can someone help to explain what is the difference between Note Arranger Keyboard and Note touch response keyboard ?
I'm working with an Yamaha DJ x and it's a great little workstation as you can record over 6 channels then mix it all down when recording the track..
Most of the time I too get myself playing my PSR SX 700 than my synth workstations. Probably just turning it on and it's readiness to jam right away might be the reason. While on Synths, first it's patching then tweaking and on and on...
Arranger in short is a one man band instrument
workstation in short is a solo instrument + sound design machine that can give you great option to get a great sound using many syntheses module like FM / adaptive / physical modeling... Etc..
In the end, you will need both.
Very helpful. I have an arranger piano that I now better understand. Thanks Much👍🏾
Glad it helped!
Hey Woody! I think the terms you're looking for are "Sunday Service/Bread and Butter". These are products for the keyboardist market, separate from the synthesizer market where the desire is to turn to and express yourself through an individual instrument. This to say that the major line is between these markets, not between the products you demonstrate. Anything with a screen will have multiple synth engines, lots of menus and buttons, and most will be very little about sound creation and expression, or at least will make that tedious, which in itself limits expression.
KORG PA 1000 would be a good hybrid because it allows very good sound editing even on osc-level. Unfortunately it lacks a good arppegiator (the KAOSS pad doesnt count). Also the Interface is a bit dated. The Yamaha however lacks the detailed sound editing abilities. My wish would be a the easy interface from the yamaha PSRs combined with the editing abilities from Korg.
I have always been a workstation person myself. In fact, I just purchased a Nautilis 88. Yes, I am that weird person that loves to have my workstations in the 88 note flavor. I also have an M 50 in the 88 note configuration. By the way, Woody, when you get a chance to revisit your nautilus, you might want to update to the version 1.2 if you have an already, because there are extra sound libraries and things now you can download from the shop. The new software also adds a whole Nother set of user banks and things that you can use to populate programs from, the expansion libraries and such.😊
I really wanna an arranger with 88 note flavor. But got CK88 instead. Another weird person here. Now i'm looking for additional arranger feature on PC without buying another new arranger keyboard.
Nicely Explained Woody .... It's always a good idea to visit a music shop and try out every keyboard in the shop ....before you spend money .... Personally... arranger keyboards are brilliant instant fun to mess around with .... Synths are bit more complicated to use and you can kinda get lost inside the synth creating sound instead of playing it ... Still good fun , brilliant upload ...big thumbs flying high from a galaxy far far away called Ireland ☘️🇮🇪🍻☘️☘️☘️☘️☘️☘️☘️☘️☘️
^^^ here's someone who can really put an arranger through its paces!
I used to have a Yamaha XS7 and now my main keyboard is a Tyros 4. I find the Tyros so immediate to choose and layer sounds and get a song going. The XS7 could probably do most of it (and more flexible in it’s sound editing) but it seemed more work to get there, which kinda took the fun out of it. I’m not a professional and I basically play for fun (plus a monthly local open mic night where I get to do a couple of songs in public) and the Tyros is definitely more immediate and fun! I think it’s a shame that arrangers are saddled with a cheesy “home organ” kind of reputation, as they are much more versatile than that.
i agree that arrangers tend to be easier to get basic stuff done, the OS is a bit simpler. i regret not ever owning a tyros myself, might be fun to pickup an older model.
@@WoodyPianoShack Go for a Korg PA4X. Now the PA5X has just arrived, I am sure they will be some PA4X bargains. I own the Motif XS8 and a Korg PA4X. The PA4X doesn't have built in speakers although there is an optional PAS Speaker and Keyboard is a solid build not made to go on the road with a performer. As others have said the Arrangers are great one man bands.
My next musical journey, I think is with the Fantom 8 and a Juno X.
. PhilW222... Your right... And most of cases you can record a song on then in 16 tracks, modify and record the presets as a kind o "simpler" Sinth and... If you don't want any accompaniment at all, you may easily pass it over...
And Also, you can only use your own edited sounds and ... They may be in much cases really impressive.... As maybe some high price Synthesisers some times...
I think those critics are in much cases some kind of snobbery......
Phil..I agree with your comment completely.. I have owned several keyboards and have settled on tyros 3 and cheaper more portable Casio CTX 5000.. I love the versatility of an arranger and the Tyros styles are just brilliant..
I have both and this is how I see it: the arranger keyboard is my orchestra that I'm conducting and the synth is my instrument factory where I design and build new instruments when needed.
sadly... right now it boils down to availability and set up... my choice would be one of the korg pa 700 arranger keyboards, as they seem more of a hybrid between the two types... but they don't seem to be available any time in the near future here in Canada. My local music store got in a Yamaha psr sx-700, and I snapped it up. Luckily I also found a yamaha reface dx, if I want to "synth" around.. and I've figured out how to connect it via Midi to my Yamaha p515. (and with synths it's very easy to get caught up in modifying sounds instead of playing) As a newer keyboard player, it's also very easy to go down a rabbit hole of choices... so far. the sx 700 is a ton of fun to play, it's got a lot of features but they feel very accessible and I spend more time playing than fiddling.
This was posted nine months ago, and a couple of changes since then. I own an older Korg PA800, having previously had a Korg PA-80 and a Korg iX300. Yamaha has had arranger keyboards out for decades, as well as home organs with auto accompaniment, and other manufacturers, Wurlitzer, Lowry, Baldwin, and others. The difference between synth and arranger, or 'portable keyboard' at the time was huge.
In 1993, Korg entered the market and really upped the game with the introduction of the original i3, the 'i' meaning 'interactive.' Up until that point, if you selected a style, say a Bossa Nova, it didn't really matter what chord you played, you got the same rhythmic elements. The original i3 changed that. If you played a major chord, you got one rhythmic style, but if you played a minor chord, you got another, and if you played a diminished chord, you got a third. Different chord styles had different rhythmic elements to it. Korg also had all high-quality (for the day) sampled sounds, which even some synths were still using FM modulation or other types of sound generation. Korg forced Yamaha and Casio to seriously up their game.
You are correct that top-of-the-line Arrangers are much more costly than a comparable (if you can use such a word) synth. Starting with the Korg PA4X and Yamaha Genos, and the Ketron Audya, you started having keyboards that produced near radio-ready sounds and backing tracks. The lines began to blur. Korg offered and has for quite some time, ever-increasing sound control. Even my PA800, which was introduced in 2006 has the ability to alter the built-in sounds with the attack, decay, release, and cutoff, as well as LFO control, and two reverb channels. Today's newly released PA5X goes far beyond those capabilities.
As mentioned, the PA5X and the Genos both have the ability to have a mic input and effects for the singer. The new PA5X even goes beyond that to include the ability to input a guitar and run it through multiple effects, which include not only reverb, chorus, and delay, but even down to cabinet style and type, number of speakers, and multiple pedals, while still having the ability for the keyboard player to play his stuff and a singer, all at the same time. The PA5X has over 2,000 sounds, also, including General MIDI, Yamaha XG formatted sounds, Legacy Korg sounds, and the latest and greatest. Korg also includes something, going all the way back to my PA800, called DNC, or Defined Nuance Control. Pressing a button would give you something else, a trill, a run between two notes, switching maybe a trumpet to a mute. The PA3X really expanded those out, and today's PA5X has gone even further.
But, as you said, the price has gone up. A Korg Nautilus 73, with a stand and such, is $2,700 USD, whereas a PA5X similarly configured (without speakers) is $5,100 and adds another $400 for the speakers. Note that since the PA3X, Korg has not included speakers on their flagship Arranger, and both the Yamaha Tyros and Genos also went the same way. Even as far back as the original i3, ix300, and several other Korg arrangers, they did not come with built-in speakers.
Having said all of that, I took about a year's worth of piano lessons when I was a child. I was never very good at them, and I never learned to read or play bass clef. My father had a lot of Fake books around, and I learned to play chords (although never to animate them). So, when the first home organs that had some sort of auto-accompaniment came out, I was thrilled. Unable to buy one, but thrilled. A few decades later, I got my iX300 and from there, moving on. I hope in this upcoming year to be able to get a new 76 key PA5X. For me, kind of like your family, I want to be able to sit down and play, and to have it sound 'complete.' I do some sequencing, I can use the internal sequencer in the arranger, or use the chord sequencer, and I also use Band In A Box. So, I can do a lot of what a synth can do, and some of the stuff a synth can do that an Arranger can't, I'm not really interested in.
Forty years ago, yeah, there was a ton of difference, a very wide gap. That gap, particularly at the high end of the spectrum, has closed significantly. The guy that wants to do a two or three piece gig, a high end Genos, PA3/4/5X, a singer and maybe a sax or guitar player, will be able to put together a really good gig. For him, the day that the singer and the instrumentalist aren't available, he can still go play gigs by himself (or herself) and still be viable (unless they have a voice like mine!)
Hi Woody. I've got a question about your yamaha psr-sx900.....how long does it take this keyboard to boot up (from pushing the power button to being able to play)?
never timed it jeff, but was nothing exceptional, probably about 30 seconds.
Hi Woody. How did you manage to mount your monitor to your "Ultimate Support" keyboard stand. I'm seeing a lot of velcro.
I would love to try that out with my Yamaha PSR SX900.
Cheers.
you'll have to go back and watch some of my old videos on psrs900, where I show how i did this!
I think the whole video is summed up perfectly from 11:40 to 12:15. IMHO both are great for different reasons. Ego (& snobbery) can be a barrier sometimes.
Great video !! But still cannot decide !
I am a piano player, jazz.
But I miss some drums and bass to play alone sometimes.
I 'm studying loopers vs sequencers now. Any suggestions ?
not really, there are so many choices, you'll have to do your own research and compare...! have fun :)
i´d like to have the genos styles in the montage. montage/modx arps are out of date. i believe much of them came from the xf/moxf.
And if youre using Cubase the high end Yamaha Keyboards are very easy and good to connect to your DAW as a hybrid of Synth and Arranger. (Im using Logic) 😁
Now your making me think about the psx900 just because seeing you make so much fun on it... but I already have the modx and nautilus and it's getting crowded on my workspace :p
Hi Woody. For a solo musician playing lounges or small venues, would having an arranger and a good synth offer more versatility for both ease of backing tracks and a variety of sounds? Thank you for your efforts on making this video, I really enjoyed it.😀🎵🎶
an arranger would be an awesome choice for a solo musician, to add some drums or comp, or backing tracks. the single arranger (if you get a good one) has everything you need, I personally see no reason to gig with a second board.
I remember when I first started thinking about getting a keyboard. The marketing of workstations and arrangers is very similar to a beginner and it's hard to differentiate which direction to go in at first. For me, once I had actually played on a couple in a shop I realised the difference. That may sound crazy if you've always known about keyboards, but I had no idea. If I wasn't the kind of person who likes to research something to death before committing, I could easily have made a mistake so this video may well save a few people from expensive mistakes- especially as arranger keyboards tend to depreciate in price a lot faster than synths and workstations!
Also, please never shave the beard off again!
I really hope this vid will be helpful, I really do get a lot of these questions so can never assume that this is obvious for everyone.
Question: If the Korg Kronos is a synthesizer workstation, what would you call a JD 800 or Korg M1? I'm so confused lol. Or let's put it this way....At what point does something like a dx7 turn into a workstation?
m1 was the first workstation == broad selection of sounds + multitimbral + sequencer + effects, so dx7 fails on all counts!
ny solution to this is BUY a Roland BK7m arranger moduke and hook up your favorite synth as its master, like a yamaha Motif. Brings the 2worlds of synth /arranger together and also combine roland sounds(4 live parts) and Yamaha sounds on just 1 keyboard+module
Great video Woody, my same conundrum. I like both, but have been vasilating between Korg Nautilus or the Yamaha MODX, my only bummer is they don't have the full arrangement capability of the arrangers. I love the plug and play and being a piano player I still have my CP4 that I play with my arranger...It's just too much fun. Thanks again for your content.
that reminds me, we also have those incredible home digital pianos that pack in the arranger features too, that's another category to consider.
@@WoodyPianoShack do tell, I'm drawing a blank?.
@@bluch251 the yamaha cvp line
Korg Nautilus isn't a good investment. Combine your cp4 with Modx. It's a lovely set up. Prior to replacing mine (cp4) with CP88, I used the same. Even though I studied comp/arrangement - I don't like dedicated arranger boards/hybrids and don't use them. So I'll defer to Woody on it; and will be interested to see the reply.
@@WoodyPianoShack Yamaha DGX670B?
what do you think of the akx10 medeli? Thinking about doing a review of this affordable arranger workstation?
never even heard of it, need to do some research there.
you get what you pay for....
At 14:28
Basically, “To all the synths (and workstations) I’ve loved before 🎶 that traveled in and out my door 🎶 I’m glad they came along 🎶 I dedicate this song …”
this really helpped me. just a few days ago, I was on a keyboard fb group, and I asked about the differences. I have alot of arrangers, and no work stations. accept for my roland ax keytar, and my microkorg vocoder. but what about the roland E series, they're never mentioned in popular arangers, I have the E-28.
aren't the e-series quite an old range of arrangers? i think roland left the arranger category?
@@WoodyPianoShack hey. sorry it took so long to reply. yes, I think somewhere in the 90s they came out.
Is it possible to connect the MODX to the SX900 so you can play them both at the same time through the sx900 built in loudspeakers?
yes, if i recall the SX has line inputs for connecting another synth or audio device.
@@WoodyPianoShack Great! Can you make a video of it and play some cool songs? Some 80's mega hits would have been great 😀
oh yes , thats really very easy actually. so you can use the arranger parts for the band and play the created sound on the modx.
i just got myself a jupiter xm and are going to do the same.
It looks like you've had your SX900 for a while now. Did you find your keybed getting disturbingly noisy as time went on? I'm thinking of getting one and doing research there seems to be a lot of folks saying this is an inevitability. Thanks!
my sx was only a loaner so went back to yamaha after a few months, but during that time, yes, it did develop a noisy action so beware.
@@WoodyPianoShack Thanks for the reply. That's too bad to hear (no pun intended), but seems to reflect the consensus I'm reading on the keybed's fate.
I have a Tyros 4. I used to have a Pa1X Pro. For live gigging, arrangers are indispensable if you're a one man band, as I was. But yes they have serious limitations. Mine is able to edit sounds, and even load samples with the Tyros Voice Editor software, and the optional ROM expansion card, BUT even then it's very limited. I wish someone would come up with a workstation with Arranger function.
great point, they are a popular choice for troubadours, entertainers, one man bands!
Careful Woody. It’s whole blurring starts me wondering how close we are wandering to Wersi, Ringway and Bohm traditional spinet organs as the new OAX is basically a workstations to be considered as well
hi karl, yes, much overlap between these categories, not sure If I'll ever get to try those instruments you mention.
I'd love a hands on review on the new Roland Fantom 0 series. And the upcoming Hammond SKX Pro as well. Cheers
yeah, it I could get hold of one!
The first round allocations of the Fantom 0's seems to have gone to a younger generation of influencers. Some provide good demos, but I wouldn't call any of what I've seen so far "reviews." All pros and no cons. Well hopefully Roland will send you one for review - you did such a great job throughly covering the Roland FA series.
I see arrangers like fast food. It doesn't require a lot of technical knowledge and you can get started making music quickly. But it's hard to do in-depth editing beyond what you get in the box.
Workstations are like a homemade meal. It takes a lot more work and knowledge but you have full control of your food's flavor.
certainly when it comes to editing sounds, yes! what I didn't mention is that arrangers also allow you to build your own styles so doesn't have to be readymade fast food! :)
v3xman ... the comment you made above I liked better; that it depends on the situation. I would add "preferences". In the following I can only hope you are blessed with humor😉 And now you judge keyboards "fast food" (the worse kind of food? For beginner?). Coming from electronic organ (THE ultimate Performer-Machine!!!), I played every keyboard instrument ... excepted Accordeon. I don't get this pumping checked😅
Criticism is one thing ... judgement another. The author of this video gave his best to point out advantages and disadvantages. To me the topic is finished with this. And then I read many judgements here. Hm🤔
Btw I have a MODX 8 now. And what a surprise... it has disadvantages... many of them. Let's take the MODX/Montage: extraordinary sound! Extraordinary flexibility! Then a Wersi Organ: extreeeeeeme performance possibilities ... hands, feet, one hand playing on TWO manuals and simular tricks, we learned. Also not perfect! Problem: you need a moving company for live performances. AND ... the price. AND despite the astronomical price: not the slightest touch of the sound of a MODX! Also Interesting fact, you all possibly don't know: the organ has no theoretical polyphony-limit.
Keyboards are imho somewhere in between. The bet stands! You with your MODX, bring with your Laptop and all tracks filled in the DAW ... and me with a Wersi (which I no longer have) ... let's compete😉 The camera on my manuals ... you will look pretty old😅 Despite I am not a master skilled professional player like you; the audience believes to hear 10 instruments I am playing the same time. Btw: a piano player could look down on a special finger-technique I'm having. Makes no sense on a piano; but on an organ; and a player with small hands. No judgment please! We learned such things! Expedient technique! On the other side your special Montage-sounds and the 16 tracks of your DAW ... I myself will look pretty old😪 ... perhaps your polyphony limit will help me out again😉
Another example: some people call themselfs "professionals" and judge the keybed/keys of an organ as "cheap". Perhaps on Keyboards, but surely not to generalize. They don't know, what they are talking about. The special design, the wheightless construction ... sophisticated developed! Not cheap ... expedient. And in contrary to pianos there never died an elephant to build the keys😉
Kidding aside. Let's leave the bubble and quick judgements. I can't see any objective argument for a final judgement which instrument is "better" or "worse". A perfect machine is not yet built. I personally am not the mouse/touchscreen/DAW-player. I like the (physical) action and playing much as possible by my own hands/feet. An organ is MY thing. And even if I am not a good player, I reject all judgements from people where I am standing on the chicken ladder😉 Depends on the instrument I am sitting infront.
If it uses "Styles" and it's got buttons for Intro, Variations, Fill, Ending (or Outro), and allows you to play chords in the left hand with 1 finger and/or some other smart fingering, then it's an arranger. Korg befuddled many with their release of the "i3 Music Workstation" in 2020 because by function it was clearly a arranger. Maybe they called it a workstation because it doesn't have speakers - I don't know! Most online music stores now place this i3 in the "arranger" category, not in the "workstation" category.
yeah, strange that korg would call it a music workstation, which they called their M1, and not an arranger. sounds more pro perhaps.
Is Casio WK series are Workstation Keyboard series. What is the difference of Workstation Keyboard.
there is a lot of overlap between synths, workstations, arrangers. I checked the specs, it would seem to be what I would categorize as a keyboard arranger - "A total of 260 preset rhythms with full accompaniment are built-in. One button click brings you access to styles from rock, pop, Latin, jazz, country, classical and everything in between. You can choose to have just a drummer or full virtual band at your disposal"
Where did you hear that intro instrumental piece? I recognize it from Kings Quest soundtrack...?
It's one of Kevin Macleod's pieces
I’m a singer songwriter who’s also trained arranger and I understand music. I’m also an instrumentalist of bassoonist sax player and guitarist. I’ve had my own bands write my own music do covers I’ve done the whole gamut. I actually started with one of the first step sequencers called the QX one by Yamaha, which really dates me obviously, but that’s where I learned the core of all this stuff Years went by one into another career, came back and started fooling around garage band and I loved it. One of my biggest issues was always that technology was not user-friendly and by the time I learned it I lost all my creativity so now I’m looking for something that’s not necessarily a beginner instrument, and gives me power, but also is intuitive and easy to use! And I want to write music I wanna write my own styles, but I’m also intrigued by, the garage band does drums. For instance, since I’m not a drummer - I loved pulling in the different sounds grading volumes and timbres and stuff just on the touchscreen which is really cool.
So I’m feeling schizophrenic reading this stuff because arranger sound like something I’d probably want to explore more, but I’m really not into half of the cheesy styles. Workstations at seams are super complicated. I have a Yamaha Modoc’s, and I really just leave it alone because it takes me too long to figure it out all the time. I want some thing to be able to write and get my ideas down quickly but I also want to be able to be ready to play live. Does that make sense? Could somebody give me some tips? Some people have said arrangers are great for songwriting, but I think it’s because you need to think about them differently than what a lot of other people think about them as - I don’t play for weddings and stuff like that, I do this for my own music. Sorry for the long, I really appreciate your input. I’m trying to figure out what to buy.
yeah, synth workstations pretty complicated and heavy on synth sounds and sound design, which might be good depending on the music style. arrangers have onboard sequencers too, so you don't have to use any chesszy tyles. but your best bet, if not fir gigging, is to buy something like ni komplete and do it in the cubase/ableton/logic.
I'm still dreaming about the ultimate Arranger Keyboard with full synthesizer workstation capabilities without any compromises, so you've everything you ever need in a box. But such a device will never exist, I bet.
It exsited around a decade a go and was called Miko ...think they went out of business cos they were just too expensive for most people.
Thinking about getting a Roland Fantom-08. I'm just waiting for some reviews to appear before making a decision.
The 08 is the 8 lighter a bit smaller and a slightly more cramped interface. You’ll also miss the VPiano which is not in the Fantom-0 series, but in the full fledge. Other than that, you can watch any review on the fantom, you’ll get virtually the same thing other than differences in the front and back panel.
yes, i'm curious too, hope to get one in for review some day, don't seem to have gone out to the usual youtubers this time/yet.
@@godzil42 Also no Aftertouch and less memory (I think). And you will have to pay for the synth expansions which were free for owners of the "big" Fantoms.
@@willjosef8087 The way the memory is handled on the Fantom is a bit weird, I think they have the exact same amount. As for the model expansion, don't know either, Roland Cloud show them as free download for me..
I think Yamaha arranger keyboards are possibly worth buying for the
sounds alone even if you have no intention of using the auto accompaniments.
The saxophones on many Yamaha arrangers are very similar if not the same as
the saxophone sounds in Halion 6. I plan to stick with Halion 6 as long as it
continues to work and only if it ceases to function will I consider a Yamaha arranger
or a Yamaha Motif ( even the module versions of Motif may suit my needs better ).
Steinberg belongs to Yamaha ;-)
that's interesting!
Well it was a good video but....I'm still confused between the two of them. I'm wanting to learn how to play piano but use the scores of sounds to embellish my music/songwriting. I'm a guitar and strings person. But I want different accompaniments at times like an oboe, flute, accordion, chorus, French horn, drums, bass, synth/organ etc etc etc. with the various effects as well.
learn a Daw like Ableton or Logic.. Infinite posiblilities
The other day I saw a video review of an arranger where the idea for the video was going into it thinking it was stupid and a waste of money. But by the end of the video the dude was obsessed with it and wanted to buy his own because he had to return the review sample. Some of them have so much connectivity and control over the sounds that you can create sounds or make music in ways you never thought of before. They aren’t really meant for studio recording type use, but in that setting it seems the feature rich models shine. I’m actually convinced that some of the really weird songs that work but make no sense to me were made this way.
Now I wonder if they will ever make a modular synth arranger.
Sir, according to you which is better Yamaha PSR SX900 OR YAMAHA MODX 8+
two different instruments, depends on what you need.i don't have any more to say than what I presented here,
@@WoodyPianoShack sir, i need different instruments sounds like electric bass guitar and electric guitar sounds , including acoustic guitar sounds, drums sounds and variety of different piano sounds mainly needed for one time investment and I could use it for 10 years for song writing and music creation .
Often manufacturers use different words for the same thing because the other company has trademarked that word. This mixes me up.
You can add entertainer keyboards and stagepianos to that list.
Today I would say if you like to work in a DAW you are good to go with synthesizers, if not you should try an arranger workstation. Back then, when these arrangers (especially Yamaha) came around, synthesizers clearly sounded more specialized, which means better, more exciting.
To be honest, the MODX ( and Montage, of course) can sound like a stack of exciting synths of the past. I think, I proved it. Listen to the demonstration videos on my channel.
I think both types of keyboard have their pros and cons both soundwise and in terms of features. If I was well off I would have both types of keyboards,
as I know even the Yamaha PSR-S and PSR-SX have very high quality sound maybe not as good as Tyros or Genos but still better than the entry level models
( I'm not sure weather or not entry level keyboards count as an arranger ). If I do decide to buy something more up to date than my Yamaha PSR-295 in the next
2-4 years then it will be a question of what I can afford but as I have previously pointed out even many of the sounds in that PSR-S970 are the same samples
that I'm currently using in Halion and as I like those sounds so much maybe I should consider getting a hardware keyboard with those sounds as a safety net.
I'm sure you could probably get an S970 for under a grand if your lucky, an MODX6 is also not out of the question as those are also under a grand, it might not
be quite as good as a Montage but you get what you pay for.
which yamaha board is being used at 4:30
also at 14:00
What is the name of that first music played in the beginning of the video ?.
i don't know, but it's by kevin mccloud, it's all over yt
@@WoodyPianoShack Thanks boss, for replying. Love from India.♥
"Scheming Weasel" by Kevin MacLeod
Todays higher end arrangers have incredible tone. They are real modern jukeboxes. I would go with arranger just to get done some serious backing tracks for guitar noodling. And just fun for it. But where is the affordable limit? I found only highest end devices can sound really truely musical out of box. I will not drop names because maybe many of the higher priced can be shifted to sound great with minor adjusting.
Thank you for the information. I have had several work stations, with my current setup being a Kronos. I too have wondered about the difference between arranger boards and work stations...and for the cost I would have thought the arrangers would have been a whole lot more. I see the fundamental differences and will stick to work stations.
Korg PA arrangers from the 1993 i3 onwards have all been fully programmable synthesisers.
Great video Woody. You must be a LUCKY MAN that your wife let you have so much toys, LIKE ME ?!! :) Even I have a Yamaha C-5 6'7" Acoustic Grand Piano, and other good keyboards, basses and acoustic drums that I use to play in multiple bands, One-Man-Band keyboards are still so much fun to play by oneself. :) I just wish Yamaha would possibly make a Genos, PSR-X or PSR-S series Upgrade Module or even a whole control panel linked thru USB or Upgradable Firmware Module, that can upgrade/replace my older Yamaha CVP Series mini grand arranger piano (that cost over $10k new) to a more recent sounding one ?!! Even Roland or Korg could consider making a "Yamaha CVP Series Replacement Module" like one would replace a Guitar/Bass Pickups & Pre-Amp ?! :) After all, these arranger keyboards are computers, so it's just like upgrading your Gaming Computers components; without replacing your Desktop Case (my Polish Ebony CVP Series grand piano case still looks so nice and polished like my Big Grand), Speakers (the CVP Series has a powerful speakers system that you can FEEL like playing on a grand, unlike plugging into a PA system which I have too), Keyboard & Mouse (3 pedals of my CVP grand) ?! :) Wouldn't that be great for their business and the environment ?! :)
i'd replace all those digital machines in this video for an acoustic grand! lucky you! :)