Another in a long list of weasel-worders who won't shut up and actually answer the question. They're like the kind of critter who thinks if it can't see you, you can't see it.
Less than 400 parts per Million is CO2 in the Atmosphere. Lets break that down into usable chunks. -- 400 ppm = 40 parts per 100,000 = 4 parts per 10,000. Four Parts per 10,000, imagine a Huge Fish Tank with 9,996 White Balls in it with Only 4 Black Balls in it filling it up. So after 100 years you take 1 White Ball out and Replace it with 1 Black Ball after 100 years, are you really going to Notice a Difference?????????? This is how Ridiculous the Climate Change Industry really is, it is based on Scaremongering the population and the Media and some Politicians are Complicit in the Scaremongering.
Just out of curiosity... you do know that you don't know WTF you're talking about, right? I mean, you can't honestly believe that your "keen insight" into these numbers has invalidated generations worth of humanity's confident research into climate by the world's PhD scientists, can you? Surely no one could be that ridiculous and devoid of the least hint of common sense. Right?
How could you possibly get this many incompetent fools in one administration ? I have yet to see anyone at any level be prepared and honestly answer anything.
"What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries?... In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?" - Maurice Strong (First Director of the United Nations Environment Program)
@@secondchance6603 The only flaw in that reasoning is that there isn't any group of world leaders that give a 'biden' (shit) what happens to the earth.
When Josh Hawley was taking it to her about her leadership colluding with dark money billionaires she kept claiming that she wasn't in charge, that they work as a team - all the feminist psychobabble we get from modern women. As soon as she got into trouble she turned into a "damsel in distress."
In this administration, they're all diversity hires. Knowledge of anything is not a requirement to be qualified for any position in the Biden administration.
She is very skilled for her job tho. She knows exactly how to drag out an answer with fluff so she doesn't have to answer the question at the end. Thats all these charlatans want because they know their story has holes in it the size of grand canyon.
I'm sick of all this now. I was a factory worker for years. As soon as everyone adopted the "diverse" workforce, I had to work 50% harder, because the girls couldn't do every job. Or they'd complain about being sore. So the guys had to skip the easier jobs. Buy when it's time for promotions, guess who goes to the top of the lists? People like the woman in the video.
"What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries?... In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?" - Maurice Strong (First Director of the United Nations Environment Program)
@@secondchance6603 yea, well those industrialized "rich" civilizations also have the most powerful militaries in the world. ya know, the thing that ideals, paper work, and social contracts cant do anything to stop? Sure have fun
I feel extremely Sad for the Young people , they have been given a Life Sentence of Pain and Grief with no Parole. What a Joy it feels to be Old , getting closer and closer to going home , Iv'e served my time
It's not just younger generations being impacted by these stupid people. The Guy asking the questions is about middle age, like me and he is raising concerns about farmers and people being affected by the idiotic 'drought' classification having direct impacts now.
"What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries?... In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?" - Maurice Strong (First Director of the United Nations Environment Program)
This woman (Haaland; Secretary of the Department of the Interior) is clueless of her own Department’s statistics of which Rep. LaMalfa (R-OR) knows and quotes ON CO2, decommission of dams and silt pollutants behind dams - she does not even dispute his figures which his research has found.
Why care about your lack of knowledge when you know you're their because you check diversity boxes? She's not there to know stuff, just to check the boxes.
Yearly salary = $221,400. Gold Standard insurance, company vehicle/drivers, free first class air travel, and all expenses paid. Not to mention some can't miss stock tips. All of it paid for by you. And there are 20 more cabinet positions.
@@vinrusso821 Her father was 0% Native American, her mother some part, but no matter...even if 1/20th, Deb gets to claim full Native American victimhood w/ all rights and privileges pertaining. Will we ever get beyond this identity-political idiocy, or are we mired in it forever?
I remember classmates at school looking and talking like her when caught unprepared by a teacher's questions. Of course there would be excuses for the laziness and/or stupidity and ultimately it didn't matter because the consequences of not knowing the answers would be miniscule. But she works in government, in a position where it is her job - paid for very well by the taxpayers - to know these answers. There can be no excuse for her ignorance/laziness/stupidity demonstrated here. The people deserve better than having a failure like that in a leading government position.
Carbon dioxide gets stored in all kinds of plants, trees etc. Do they know how much carbon dioxide is stored in the ground, that used to be in the air at one point. There used to be much more carbon dioxide in the air, it makes nature greener. Plus humans are CO2 machines, we work together with nature…
Meanwhile burning fossil fuels by the ton to make EVs, Solar Panels and Wind Turbines that are then shipped all over the world used for around 10yrs torn down or up and put into landfill. Let alone the hundreds of millions of gallons of water used to process lithium salts. In Australia they are ripping up considered ecological significant land sites which are known Kola habitats of supposed high risk of extinction species to put in 200m wind turbines and then all the land decimated to run power lines from those places. Probably will only ever make 30% of its marketed generation as pretty much all other wind farms seem to be doing at best on average.
5:30 That is a silly argument. While the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere is low that doesn't mean it can be just ignored. CO2 makes the atmosphere less transparent for infrared radiation. 250 ppm (0.025%) is about one drop in a glass of water. Dilute one drop of ink in a glas of water and you will see what a difference 250 ppm make. Nevertheless someone advocating CO2 reduction should know these things. The arguments about misguided policies doing environmental damage and nothing to reduce CO2 emissions are much better, valid arguments.
4:45 "It is my understanding that the drought persists." Your understanding is wrong. The west coast has had two record wet winters in a row. The ground is saturated and the dams are overflowing.
I'm glad the incompetent secretary finds the hearings amusing to where she and her entourage are laughing it up. Like a slap to the face of the American taxpayer. D.C. bureaucrats couldn't care less about the nation's issues.
"What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries?... In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?" - Maurice Strong (First Director of the United Nations Environment Program)
@@secondchance6603what if a small group of ultra-rich people from the United States and other countries decide to get richer off of "climate change" by controlling every aspect of our lives for "our own good" without going after the real polluters. If we were in a major drought, I could be filling my glass with water to drink and stay alive, while my rich neighbor is filling his giant swimming pool. Guess who they will go after. You get one guess. Do screw it up!
@@secondchance6603 And then there's this nugget: "We redistribute de facto the world's wealth through climate policy....One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore." -- Dr. Ottmar Endenhofer, co-chair of Working Group 3 of the U.N.'s IPCC, Nov. 13, 2010.
It's because they block fish (salmon) going upstream for reproducing. Only, when they install stairs like water bypass, the fish can go upstream. But, the construction costs money, and the water loss will reduce the power production.
And now CA is talking about creating a new dam for water storage. So short sighted to remove dams that 1)store water in a desert and 2) create "clean energy".
The "experts" told us in the 80's that there was no question that we'd soon be in a new ice age. A few years later they came in to our classrooms to tell us that acid rain was going to poison planet earth. Then they decided the earth was going to be a ball of fire soon. I can only be lied to so many times before I stop listening.
25 years ago they said New York City and New Orleans would be under water by now. The oceans haven't risen an inch. I remember back in the 1970's when they said we were heading towards an ice age. Then it was a hole in the ozone layer, then acid rain. All "scary" stuff to push an agenda!!
All of these were true, then we either got new info or fixed it. Cyclically, yes we were going into another ice age. Then our CO2 data came in and we realized how exponentially bad the blanket of heat trapping molecules was. Lead, mercury and acid in rain used to be a very real problem until we passed a ton of environmental laws to clamp down on emissions. Every global heat record continues to be broken every year, even if it might get slightly colder in some places.
TBH we have had several doomsday scenarios explained to us... holes in the ozon layer that would very likely kill us all, then the stuff about the gases used in aerosol sprays, then we were encouraged to buy diesel cars because that was best (now diesels are demonised, get extra taxes and not allowed in city centres (unless you pay, then it's ok)), then there was carbondioxide, acid rain, Tjernobyl was going to poison half of Europe, the ice caps were melting, there was too much water, there was not enough water, there was enough water but it rained too much so it was too much water, the new ice age is coming, but there is global warming at the same time... get your own chickens and get your own eggs, but then avian flu and you have to lock up or kill the chickens that were encouraged to roam freely... breed more cows locally BUT don't let them fart or burp because that's producing methane, so stop having cows... the entire COVID mismanagement was ridiculous yet they made us do the silliest things, probably as a social experiment... ; climate/health and 'green' stuff is costing us SO much money, it's incredible; 90% of the experts know just enough to silence the 10% that do know their stuff
think it was the 70s not the 80s, they change to its warming in the 80s, its why most temperature graphs start in 1979 lol the coldest year of the 1900s
The biggest issue is that they don't have any obligation to answer, know the answer or tell the truth to any question. There are no consequences for incompetence or intentional obstruction.
This woman needs to be arrested! Please explain to me how a Chinese company can mine in the USA (Bradshaw Mountains) AZ! I mean I am certain an American mining company would love to mine it but nope it was given to China. For those that don’t know the Bradshaw Mountains are one of the richest gold mining regions in the country. Please explain it to us AZ residents?
Big mistake to dismantle the dam on the Klamath River. The do-gooders often don't foresee the Unintended Consequences of their "good intentions." Deb Haaland seems barely capable of holding down even a minor county position. All the hysteria about "climate crisis," and she doesn't know the percentage of CO2 of the atmosphere is only 0.04%.
@@LANeverSleeps - 4 parts per 10,000 and you add 1 more part every 100 years, are you really going to notice the difference and will it end the World like the Media and Politicians are Scaremongering us with????
@LANeverSleeps yes but we won't accomplish anything with people like this in charge. If you don't know the problem you face you can't make a decision to help anything unless you do it by accident. Electric cars are not yet the answer they cause more issues than they fix. You can't quit heating your home and we can't all live in Florida in the winter. My point is doing what's wrong just to do something is foolish. All we can do is keep investigating scientifically till we find realistic alternatives.
@@LANeverSleeps scientists who look at glacial core samples as a means to try and gauge the CO2 levels in the air through history have found layers in the distant past where the CO2 was far higher than it is today. Humans back then were not an issue. Roman Empire had a summer so hot that it makes our hot summers look tame, humans still were not enough in population to be the issue. The weather changes, and it can change fast with the eruption of a volcano. There were years that had no summer due to volcanoes erupting the previous year. Take a look at how much Mt. Saint Helens affected the global weather over time.
If C02 is heavier than air what would it be doing above the level of air? Yes C02 is densest at low altitude I agree and as it only makes up 0.04 % of the atmosphere than it has NO EFFECT on anything also if you test C02 to see if it has any magical effect on temperature in a closed system you will find it does not. Also we don't use C02 in any way in industry due to it having an effect on warming things if It did we would use this. What it does is stay low on the ground and smother flames to put out fires. Trees produce more C02 than man, yes they consume C02 but when the leaves drop and get eaten by insects and bacteria they produce C02 this is normal and 96% of the worlds C02 is from this form of action. This LIE all started in the 1980's in the UK, after many years of socialist Labour rule the government could not control the unions as they represented bot the manufacturers and the workers. This is why in a Socialist dictatorship a union is abolished. In the UK Thatcher became PM and needed a way to remove power from the coal miners unions. So a way to convert from coal to gas was required and she asked scientists to give a (BS baffles brains) answer. What they came back with was C02 will make the planet hotter so we need to stop burning coal and close the coal mines. This at the time was radical but got the job done. It then got picked up by other governments as a way to change all aspects of society. Any scientist that went against the narrative was shunned and de-plat formed not allowed to talk about the issue. Once politicians get hold of a thing LIES become TRUTH. In the UK David Bellamy was one man who refused to LIE on TV and promote NONSENS. David was removed from public speaking and dropped from all TV channels, he was never allowed to put his side of the story forward as he was a man who knew his subject BOTANY and how the planet and plants work. David died in relative exile due to being too smart for modern society. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bellamy We have had this scam going now for 40 years and have been told parts of the world would be under water now and they are not in fact water level has been recorded as lower than it was in 1914. However the new way to measure water level is from 300+ miles away with a satellite in space that obviously is more accurate than a mark on a sea wall LOL. It is estimated that if you build a room 20 x20 x 20 ft square and seal it for 1 year, then after opening it you want to balance the C02 created by man outside the room it will only take 1 match to be burned. This also does not take into account that plant growth we have on the planet soaks up C02 and the planet is 20% greener due to the actions of mans C02 production. Obviously man has also cut down many forests and trees that reduce C02 absorption but as I said when leaves drop C02 is again produced. Once we have NET-ZERO and the planet climate continues to change what will be targeted next? Kill all the animals and many humans or cut down the trees and shoot them into space to stop them creating the other 96% of the C02 on the planet? All the computer predictions for man made climate change have been proven wrong / way out of prediction. Scientists told us the holes in the OZONE layers crated by CFC gasses would take 40 years to heal, wrong again the were gone in 5 years. The best thing I can say about people who just trust what the TV says is …... actually I can't think of an answer to that there is nothing good I can say about them! REMEMBER C02 in atmosphere is 0.04% and if it drops below 0.02 plant life will start to die, if that happens we will start to die.
There are many Native Americans that would be outstanding in these positions, just not any that smart that meet the Progressives membership requirements of worshiping the Obama mantra, as stated by him in 2009, "The Fundamental Changing of America", i.e. Globalization.
Note: There isn't a 'drought' of water in the Walmarts and grocery stores and Cost Co's where there are skids and skids of water being sold...also all of the water being moved to the deserts for people in du bai and other places where people are living in the friggin DESERTS in luxury!! WTF!!!!
Dude, enforcement is literally the job of the executive branch. Tell me didn't read the constitution without telling me you didn't read the constitution
Why does the US have these committee meetings, rarely do the witnesses know the subject matter of the organisations they preside over. And nothing ever seems to happen.
Her cronies thought it was funny. That they are destroying everything which makes you worry that the people really in charge have some dreadfully goal in mind. Thankyou for that question would ordinarily mean a gift to the witness, that it floors these idiots tells you everything.
It's ridiculous the people that are striving for Net Zero don't know and the panel joke about hearing before CO2 is 0.04% of the atmosphere like it's a joke and doesn't matter and just "reduce CO2 reduce CO2" . They don't even realise CO2 is not a problem AT ALL ! At 0.02% there would be world famine and at 0.015% all the plants die so problem fixed. Even now farmers pump CO2 into their greenhouses to get the plants to grow faster. The fact is plants like CO2 . At higher CO2 levels plants require less water so would be able to encroach onto desert areas. It's all round good. Before anyone replies "greenhouse gas" . CO2 isn't a very good greenhouse gas it's effect compared to like clouds is infinitely small. In fact it we doubled the CO2 in the atmosphere tomorrow apart from better growing plants you wouldn't even notice . But then all that's just facts which doesn't effect policy !
Yup and in fact the fact that plants like it will mean that plants will grow bigger to match the CO2 and out consume what we produce! The whole environmentalist movement is a scam to prey on the less informed. Green products are a multi billion dollar industry. Tell me they arent paying these politicians off and I will laugh in your face.
I love that my previous comment got removed for saying that the higher carbon dioxide would help the plants outpace our co2 emissions and it wouldnt be a problem. Guess I did also say that its a billion dollar industry and people are clearly paid off too. Makes you wonder about googles motives if theyre taking down that comment.
That's nonsense. CO2 levels have increased by fifty percent in the Industrial Era due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions and is increasing by 3 ppm a year. There's no shortage of CO2.
saying that CO2 is not a good greenhouse gas compared to water vapor ( and methane ) is true . but that is kind of like saying that rattlesnake poison is a poor poison compared to botulism toxin. Both CO2 and rattlesnake venom only have to be a certain level of "good" to cause a dangerous effect. The prediction for doubling CO2 is roughly a 1 to 4 degree Celsius average increase in Global surface temps. Think about how much heat must be added to the oceans, the air the land, to raise the average temperature of a planet by even 1 degree fahernheit. I get that 1 - 4 degrees rise in temp doesn't seem scary at al. Seems like a minor thing, if you don't understand the difference between heat and temperature ( 9th grade physical science should have got us there ) Climate change is much more about heat stored in air land and water than the actual temp. 1 - 4 degrees also seems minor because the effect takes time to happen. There are all kinds of tipping point effects that can unleash other warming agents... One example is the Right now permafrost keeps millions of tons of Methane from being released into the atmosphere. Methane is a far more potent greenhouse gas than CO2. A fool considers tipping the first domino in a series of dominoes as a self contained event , like it falling over is all that will happen. The effects of increasing greenhouse gasses are reasonably predictable. But yes, let's bequeath to our great grandchildren Another bill for them to pay. and when they ask why we tipped the first domino? Well who cares? we got ours... and probably won't even be around to answer.
Jeez these things are always the same. Put an actor in the chair, they pretend to not hear/not understand/be incompetent and the end result is nobody is held to account.
No it's not. Climate fear mongering along with dangerous cow, dangerous farms will cause food problems which will cause a population decrease and that's they want no matter what because someone decided that we are too many. Hydro has no impact on climate but banning heating at all options including wood and coal will make heating illegal. Problem is that they ignore what people want or need, ignoring protests and do what they want or follow corporations, wef or foundations orders. Everything about money is that they own doctors, scientists, experts which tell us how to live, eat, drink or wash hands. This stops only when people stop talking their money and care more about their life and interests. In the end all traitors will pay because some don't think, others care only about money but they're only tools and will be sacrificed when time comes. Because nobody can live without air, water or food.
If i were questioning any witness, id start with "Do not thank me for my question. You thank me for my question, ill take it as you dont know or you dont want to answer"
To be fair to the official being questioned, the person asking the questions seems to waffle endlessly about tangential factors before "asking" a rather open ended question. Q. What am I to say ? A. WTF? Say about which of the many points you wandered past in the last three minutes ? That being said Deb Haaland seems stunningly unprepared for this session. Recently appointed?
Today they started on the 2nd of four dam removals on the Klamath River. They hope to have this one removed by the end of august. Yet all the salmon and fish are still breathing in the silt. That's just like human beings breathing in dust all day. The water being used for irrigation right now out of the Sacramento river is so silty it leaves a trail of silt coming out of every irrigation valve.
After watching this video and many others, where Congress (mainly republican) questions the various Dept. Secretaries of this Administration. It has become clear to me that there is a huge waste in Payroll going out, since NONE seem to actually do a job other than BS Congressional Hearings.
Democrat environmentalists are not. In the 1990s an environmental group finally won one of many lawsuits to remove an earthen dam. The dam was about 30 years old. It had created a lake which was a recreation site. Businesses had been built, a community was nearby. Wildlife filled the area. Nesting Bald Eagles hunted in the lake. But they won finally. The lake was drained and the dam was destroyed. The values of homes plummeted, businesses failed without the lake, and wildlife struggled to survive. Let’s hear it for fake environmentalists.
Sounds like how Germanys environmentalists got the nuclear plants shut down and replaced with coal. The German environmentalists who were funded by... Russian big coal. (It was a different, more peaceful age)
You keep proving they know nothing about the job, but they still have the job and making up laws that's ruining the country and everyone lives instead and not doing something about it.
To call this woman incompetent would be an understatement.
Another in a long list of weasel-worders who won't shut up and actually answer the question. They're like the kind of critter who thinks if it can't see you, you can't see it.
She's several notches below incompetent.
You're being charitable.
Peter Principal..they rise to level of their incompetence.
She is beyond Farcical. How embarrassing!
Another Didn't Earn It. This administration is full of Didn't Earn It's.
Didn’t Earn It. I love it, first time I heard that 👍😂
But at least they checked all the boxes
Diversity Hiires
@@knerduno5942 Didn’t Earn It
Learned that one today and I’m gonna wear it out 👍
They hate it when you spell it D-I-E 😂
Unqualified, fire her today.
She's completely clueless. He may as well go to a kindergarten and ask a random four-year-old.
The four year olds would atleast guess.
That's why she got the job. She's perfect!
like you?
@@metro6028 Thanks, I like you too.
Are there no nurseries in America? Surely Germany is not the nearest.
Less than 400 parts per Million is CO2 in the Atmosphere. Lets break that down into usable chunks. -- 400 ppm = 40 parts per 100,000 = 4 parts per 10,000. Four Parts per 10,000, imagine a Huge Fish Tank with 9,996 White Balls in it with Only 4 Black Balls in it filling it up. So after 100 years you take 1 White Ball out and Replace it with 1 Black Ball after 100 years, are you really going to Notice a Difference?????????? This is how Ridiculous the Climate Change Industry really is, it is based on Scaremongering the population and the Media and some Politicians are Complicit in the Scaremongering.
Plus it's absurd to claim that a CO2 concentration of 0.04% could possible cause a greenhouse effect.
Just out of curiosity... you do know that you don't know WTF you're talking about, right? I mean, you can't honestly believe that your "keen insight" into these numbers has invalidated generations worth of humanity's confident research into climate by the world's PhD scientists, can you?
Surely no one could be that ridiculous and devoid of the least hint of common sense. Right?
@@telegraphdude6823
I hope, for your sake, that your comment was sarcasm. I honestly can't tell.
@@mathboy8188 - Hey did you get my other reply or has it been hidden because it told you too many truths.
@@mathboy8188 - I mentioned a word that you are not allow to say on YT and it appears you still get taken down by the "E-Safety" team.
How could you possibly get this many incompetent fools in one administration ? I have yet to see anyone at any level be prepared and honestly answer anything.
RINO Senators that voted to approve them.
"What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries?... In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?" - Maurice Strong (First Director of the United Nations Environment Program)
Truth never changes flies take time to ferment
@@secondchance6603
The only flaw in that reasoning is that there isn't any group of world leaders that give a 'biden' (shit) what happens to the earth.
trumputin managed to exceed all expectations in that area.
She knows nothing. She isnt even qualified to be allowed out of her own backyard.
When Josh Hawley was taking it to her about her leadership colluding with dark money billionaires she kept claiming that she wasn't in charge, that they work as a team - all the feminist psychobabble we get from modern women. As soon as she got into trouble she turned into a "damsel in distress."
🤣🤣😂😅🤣
Quota / Diversity Hire, that is all it is.
In this administration, they're all diversity hires. Knowledge of anything is not a requirement to be qualified for any position in the Biden administration.
She is very skilled for her job tho.
She knows exactly how to drag out an answer with fluff so she doesn't have to answer the question at the end.
Thats all these charlatans want because they know their story has holes in it the size of grand canyon.
"Thank you for the question" should be followed by an immediate arrest.
I so agree. I HATE that lying line…..they do not want to be held accountable. And this Broad SO takes the proverbial cake!
I think you misspelled execution
I agree.
they teach these people how to filibuster. it's a shame
@@lujlp TREASON used to carry that punishment, and everyone one of these Biden nominees are all guilty of treason.
Does ANYTHING get accomplished at these hearings? All I hear is witnesses bobbing and weaving and saying, "I'll have to get back to you on that".
I'm sick of all this now. I was a factory worker for years. As soon as everyone adopted the "diverse" workforce, I had to work 50% harder, because the girls couldn't do every job. Or they'd complain about being sore. So the guys had to skip the easier jobs. Buy when it's time for promotions, guess who goes to the top of the lists? People like the woman in the video.
Amen Brother. And now Boeing planes are falling out of the sky. it's only the start of the Great Failing of the West.
Not qualified if she can't even answer a question ! Fire her
Only 4% of all CO2 produced on earth comes from humans and human activity That is 0,00152% of air and that has no impact on what balans what so ever !
The answer to the farmers is "we dont care what your problems are, we have an agenda"
So true.
Usually it’s more blatant. Like “why would I ever care about a farmer?”
Remember , ‘we don’t need so many farms when we have grocery stores’-!
Everything WOKE turns to Shit
Don't insult shit like that.
"What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries?... In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?" - Maurice Strong (First Director of the United Nations Environment Program)
As shitty arrives...stay or go...it's still shit
@@bakfixx
That's right! We should call it a "biden".
Like the one I took this morning.
@@secondchance6603 yea, well those industrialized "rich" civilizations also have the most powerful militaries in the world. ya know, the thing that ideals, paper work, and social contracts cant do anything to stop? Sure have fun
Oh ffs they STILL CANT ANSWER THIS QUESTION!!???
I feel extremely Sad for the Young people , they have been given a Life Sentence of Pain and Grief with no Parole.
What a Joy it feels to be Old , getting closer and closer to going home , Iv'e served my time
Don't be so sure that it won't affect you.
It's not just younger generations being impacted by these stupid people. The Guy asking the questions is about middle age, like me and he is raising concerns about farmers and people being affected by the idiotic 'drought' classification having direct impacts now.
I agree, and I know evil people have succeeded to dumb our young people down. So shamefulllllll!
Does she know anything? I haven't heard her answer any question with clarity at all,🤡
She knows how to cash her unearned paycheck.
"What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries?... In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?" - Maurice Strong (First Director of the United Nations Environment Program)
Diversity hire.
This woman (Haaland; Secretary of the Department of the Interior) is clueless of her own Department’s statistics of which Rep. LaMalfa (R-OR) knows and quotes ON CO2, decommission of dams and silt pollutants behind dams - she does not even dispute his figures which his research has found.
Not answering with clarity is practically the most important part of her job. If she ever did answer with clarity, they would remove her immediately.
She was so far out of her element she couldn’t keep up. She didn’t even seem embarrassed by her total lack of knowledge. Terrifying.
She's not embarrassed.
Why care about your lack of knowledge when you know you're their because you check diversity boxes? She's not there to know stuff, just to check the boxes.
She believes she is far more evolved than a troglodyte conservative, when just the opposite is reality.
Yearly salary = $221,400. Gold Standard insurance, company vehicle/drivers, free first class air travel, and all expenses paid. Not to mention some can't miss stock tips. All of it paid for by you. And there are 20 more cabinet positions.
im thinking would you like frys with that mentalith
@@stevenwatts1854spell it right, bot.
All the riches didn't help the French nobility, or the soldiers that guarded them.
But she is Native American, that is how she got the job.
@@vinrusso821 Her father was 0% Native American, her mother some part, but no matter...even if 1/20th, Deb gets to claim full Native American victimhood w/ all rights and privileges pertaining. Will we ever get beyond this identity-political idiocy, or are we mired in it forever?
Is she even listening to the questions? She looks so bewilderd when he waits for an answer.
Our Secretary of the Interior is a DISASTER.
Unfit like the rest of this administration
I just watched "Idiocracy 2024: The Biden Administration".
Lucky, you get to watch it. Most of us have to live it.
How do we watch it?
@@sharkbros.9278Turn on CNN or MSNBC. You'll have a front row seat to the Clown World show.
@@sharkbros.9278 You just read your own comment
So who exactly is the "Genius" in the Biden Administration????
His first question she wasnt even listening...infact she isnt listening to this bloke at all
Neither would I. He keeps talking and talking jumping from topic to topic and then all of a sudden he asks about her opinion.
@@johnsmith1926 You must have a short attention span.
@@johnsmith1926 you just outed yourself well done.
@@PolygonSwan *yawn*
I remember classmates at school looking and talking like her when caught unprepared by a teacher's questions. Of course there would be excuses for the laziness and/or stupidity and ultimately it didn't matter because the consequences of not knowing the answers would be miniscule. But she works in government, in a position where it is her job - paid for very well by the taxpayers - to know these answers. There can be no excuse for her ignorance/laziness/stupidity demonstrated here. The people deserve better than having a failure like that in a leading government position.
She reminds me of myself in high school algebra class: not paying attention and unable to answer anything.
He may as well be talking to himself. Haaland just doesn't give a damn.
Why should anyone in the administration, congress has zero teeth at the moment.
Debby looked absolutely clueless. What does she do all day?
Practice singing "The Red Flag" ???
Flies in jets around the country snuffing out any industry possible.
Derby, I thought it was AOC?
Whatever the lobbies tell her to do.
breathes out carbon dioxide
0.04 % carbon dioxide and they are shutting down oil , hydroelectric dams , etc to stop something that is a nonissue.
4 parts per 10,000 and you add 1 more part every 100 years, are you really going to notice the difference.
Guess what trees and other photosynthesizing plants breath
Carbon dioxide gets stored in all kinds of plants, trees etc.
Do they know how much carbon dioxide is stored in the ground, that used to be in the air at one point.
There used to be much more carbon dioxide in the air, it makes nature greener.
Plus humans are CO2 machines, we work together with nature…
@@mrdbooks7285 Drinks sold at 0.05% alcohol are sold as alcohol free
Meanwhile burning fossil fuels by the ton to make EVs, Solar Panels and Wind Turbines that are then shipped all over the world used for around 10yrs torn down or up and put into landfill. Let alone the hundreds of millions of gallons of water used to process lithium salts.
In Australia they are ripping up considered ecological significant land sites which are known Kola habitats of supposed high risk of extinction species to put in 200m wind turbines and then all the land decimated to run power lines from those places. Probably will only ever make 30% of its marketed generation as pretty much all other wind farms seem to be doing at best on average.
5:30 That is a silly argument. While the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere is low that doesn't mean it can be just ignored. CO2 makes the atmosphere less transparent for infrared radiation. 250 ppm (0.025%) is about one drop in a glass of water. Dilute one drop of ink in a glas of water and you will see what a difference 250 ppm make. Nevertheless someone advocating CO2 reduction should know these things.
The arguments about misguided policies doing environmental damage and nothing to reduce CO2 emissions are much better, valid arguments.
4:45 "It is my understanding that the drought persists." Your understanding is wrong. The west coast has had two record wet winters in a row. The ground is saturated and the dams are overflowing.
I'm glad the incompetent secretary finds the hearings amusing to where she and her entourage are laughing it up. Like a slap to the face of the American taxpayer. D.C. bureaucrats couldn't care less about the nation's issues.
thank you for your statement i take it very seriously
they care about their pensions.
Amazing, DEI and UN misinformation all in one post!
"What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries?... In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?" - Maurice Strong (First Director of the United Nations Environment Program)
@@secondchance6603what if a small group of ultra-rich people from the United States and other countries decide to get richer off of "climate change" by controlling every aspect of our lives for "our own good" without going after the real polluters.
If we were in a major drought, I could be filling my glass with water to drink and stay alive, while my rich neighbor is filling his giant swimming pool. Guess who they will go after. You get one guess. Do screw it up!
@@secondchance6603 And then there's this nugget:
"We redistribute de facto the world's wealth through climate policy....One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore." -- Dr. Ottmar Endenhofer, co-chair of Working Group 3 of the U.N.'s IPCC, Nov. 13, 2010.
We need another BIG BLUE Context notification sponsored by the WHO, WEF, DEI, and UN!
@secondchance6603 they are 100% doing this!!! Causing collapse.
It was never about qualifications when Biden picked these folks it was about their activism.
Comrade joseph biden never picked these people. They were selected by the Commissars of communist Party Central.
And wokeism.
and skin tone and/or gender (whatever gender means to them.)
You are so correct
Politicians always wanted to charge for the air we breathe.
Unfortunately, a lot of these politicians are laboring to reduce the global population by any means necessary.
They tax the air, its called Carbon Tax.
WOW! Deer in the headlights for the simplest of questions. Her mind is on the Death Star.
Thank you Sir for catching her in that lie of "there is a drought..."
There is no drought, and you caught her flatfooted to respond. Excellent.
Why would we EVER decomission hydroelectric dams?!?!?!
It's because they block fish (salmon) going upstream for reproducing. Only, when they install stairs like water bypass, the fish can go upstream. But, the construction costs money, and the water loss will reduce the power production.
@@billferner6741 thats the thing they don't stop salmon if you build the water bypass its not an excuse...
To sell more windmills?
And now CA is talking about creating a new dam for water storage.
So short sighted to remove dams that 1)store water in a desert and 2) create "clean energy".
@@billferner6741 When were these dams built, and how long are the Salmon's memories???
The "experts" told us in the 80's that there was no question that we'd soon be in a new ice age. A few years later they came in to our classrooms to tell us that acid rain was going to poison planet earth. Then they decided the earth was going to be a ball of fire soon. I can only be lied to so many times before I stop listening.
25 years ago they said New York City and New Orleans would be under water by now. The oceans haven't risen an inch. I remember back in the 1970's when they said we were heading towards an ice age. Then it was a hole in the ozone layer, then acid rain. All "scary" stuff to push an agenda!!
All of these were true, then we either got new info or fixed it. Cyclically, yes we were going into another ice age. Then our CO2 data came in and we realized how exponentially bad the blanket of heat trapping molecules was. Lead, mercury and acid in rain used to be a very real problem until we passed a ton of environmental laws to clamp down on emissions. Every global heat record continues to be broken every year, even if it might get slightly colder in some places.
@@LANeverSleeps give me a break. I don't care what any of your pseudo science claims anymore. You are all crying wolf over and over again.
TBH we have had several doomsday scenarios explained to us... holes in the ozon layer that would very likely kill us all, then the stuff about the gases used in aerosol sprays, then we were encouraged to buy diesel cars because that was best (now diesels are demonised, get extra taxes and not allowed in city centres (unless you pay, then it's ok)), then there was carbondioxide, acid rain, Tjernobyl was going to poison half of Europe, the ice caps were melting, there was too much water, there was not enough water, there was enough water but it rained too much so it was too much water, the new ice age is coming, but there is global warming at the same time... get your own chickens and get your own eggs, but then avian flu and you have to lock up or kill the chickens that were encouraged to roam freely... breed more cows locally BUT don't let them fart or burp because that's producing methane, so stop having cows... the entire COVID mismanagement was ridiculous yet they made us do the silliest things, probably as a social experiment... ; climate/health and 'green' stuff is costing us SO much money, it's incredible; 90% of the experts know just enough to silence the 10% that do know their stuff
think it was the 70s not the 80s, they change to its warming in the 80s, its why most temperature graphs start in 1979 lol the coldest year of the 1900s
I still have the old timing light and tachometer
The biggest issue is that they don't have any obligation to answer, know the answer or tell the truth to any question.
There are no consequences for incompetence or intentional obstruction.
"Didn't Earn It" doing what they do best
At 1 minute... "I'm sorry Congressman I wasn't listening and I'm not doing my job on a day-to-day basis and don't know my technical brief, you got me"
Unbelievable. Another example of government employee where if she just stopped turning up not a soul would ever notice.
Kick this secretary out!
Time for her to be replaced
no a f_____ clue Interior Sec.
She's typical affirmative action hire. Horrid!
This woman needs to be arrested! Please explain to me how a Chinese company can mine in the USA (Bradshaw Mountains) AZ! I mean I am certain an American mining company would love to mine it but nope it was given to China. For those that don’t know the Bradshaw Mountains are one of the richest gold mining regions in the country. Please explain it to us AZ residents?
10% to the big Guy?
Right!!
Have any proof of what your wrote. Or like normal just spout off.
@@wd31981Bradshaw mountains are pretty easy to google. Im not doing your research.
@@wd31981 bad attitude dude
American citizens!!
Stand ready!!
This woman seems totally bewildered as to what's going on
Big mistake to dismantle the dam on the Klamath River. The do-gooders often don't foresee the Unintended Consequences of their "good intentions." Deb Haaland seems barely capable of holding down even a minor county position. All the hysteria about "climate crisis," and she doesn't know the percentage of CO2 of the atmosphere is only 0.04%.
tore down 3 damns in the Sacramento Watershed area for the salmon ofc and left behind lifeless mud flats
Not "dam" but "dams" on the Klamath. They are tearing down every one!!
@@ironcladranchandforge7292 they did 3 already on the upper Sacramento River in N CA and it left devastation behind
@@michaelkendall662what dams are you referring to exactly
She did not even know CO2 is carbon dioxide.
No kidding she has no clue! She graduated with law degree!
how -- do they give Law Degrees away for a 1 in America --- its the only way she could have got one!
@@duncansteward4331 she has powerful knees and passed the oral exam
The climate changed long before humans, it always changes. Start to worry when the equator freezes
But it has never changed this much so quickly. We levels of CO2 in the air we haven’t seen for 14 million years
@@LANeverSleeps - 4 parts per 10,000 and you add 1 more part every 100 years, are you really going to notice the difference and will it end the World like the Media and Politicians are Scaremongering us with????
@LANeverSleeps yes but we won't accomplish anything with people like this in charge. If you don't know the problem you face you can't make a decision to help anything unless you do it by accident. Electric cars are not yet the answer they cause more issues than they fix. You can't quit heating your home and we can't all live in Florida in the winter. My point is doing what's wrong just to do something is foolish. All we can do is keep investigating scientifically till we find realistic alternatives.
@@LANeverSleeps scientists who look at glacial core samples as a means to try and gauge the CO2 levels in the air through history have found layers in the distant past where the CO2 was far higher than it is today. Humans back then were not an issue. Roman Empire had a summer so hot that it makes our hot summers look tame, humans still were not enough in population to be the issue. The weather changes, and it can change fast with the eruption of a volcano. There were years that had no summer due to volcanoes erupting the previous year. Take a look at how much Mt. Saint Helens affected the global weather over time.
The equator has frozen before. Look up "snowball earth".
We urgently need to employ people qualified and stop the box ticking!
Look carefully and you can see the scar where she was lebotomised before getting her job.
A committe of 5 climate experts recently all answered between 5-7%. Lmao. Next a cross country skier will be an expert.
That already happened...it was some young dude lol, he was moronic and arrogant at best.
You must be kidding
A cross country skier will probably know way more than this lady.
@@lisalichtenstein8863 he knew nothing at all and uses their talking points that they gave him that were in fact false lol
@@ferd1775 That was the joke I think.
"Thank you for the question" is a stall tactic and clock drainer, and actually makes a person sound like a lightweight.
D e I and it's finest let's go brandon😢😢😢
its
If C02 is heavier than air what would it be doing above the level of air? Yes C02 is densest at low altitude I agree and as it only makes up 0.04 % of the atmosphere than it has NO EFFECT on anything also if you test C02 to see if it has any magical effect on temperature in a closed system you will find it does not. Also we don't use C02 in any way in industry due to it having an effect on warming things if It did we would use this. What it does is stay low on the ground and smother flames to put out fires. Trees produce more C02 than man, yes they consume C02 but when the leaves drop and get eaten by insects and bacteria they produce C02 this is normal and 96% of the worlds C02 is from this form of action. This LIE all started in the 1980's in the UK, after many years of socialist Labour rule the government could not control the unions as they represented bot the manufacturers and the workers. This is why in a Socialist dictatorship a union is abolished. In the UK Thatcher became PM and needed a way to remove power from the coal miners unions. So a way to convert from coal to gas was required and she asked scientists to give a (BS baffles brains) answer. What they came back with was C02 will make the planet hotter so we need to stop burning coal and close the coal mines. This at the time was radical but got the job done. It then got picked up by other governments as a way to change all aspects of society. Any scientist that went against the narrative was shunned and de-plat formed not allowed to talk about the issue. Once politicians get hold of a thing LIES become TRUTH. In the UK David Bellamy was one man who refused to LIE on TV and promote NONSENS. David was removed from public speaking and dropped from all TV channels, he was never allowed to put his side of the story forward as he was a man who knew his subject BOTANY and how the planet and plants work.
David died in relative exile due to being too smart for modern society.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bellamy
We have had this scam going now for 40 years and have been told parts of the world would be under water now and they are not in fact water level has been recorded as lower than it was in 1914. However the new way to measure water level is from 300+ miles away with a satellite in space that obviously is more accurate than a mark on a sea wall LOL.
It is estimated that if you build a room 20 x20 x 20 ft square and seal it for 1 year, then after opening it you want to balance the C02 created by man outside the room it will only take 1 match to be burned. This also does not take into account that plant growth we have on the planet soaks up C02 and the planet is 20% greener due to the actions of mans C02 production.
Obviously man has also cut down many forests and trees that reduce C02 absorption but as I said when leaves drop C02 is again produced.
Once we have NET-ZERO and the planet climate continues to change what will be targeted next? Kill all the animals and many humans or cut down the trees and shoot them into space to stop them creating the other 96% of the C02 on the planet?
All the computer predictions for man made climate change have been proven wrong / way out of prediction.
Scientists told us the holes in the OZONE layers crated by CFC gasses would take 40 years to heal, wrong again the were gone in 5 years.
The best thing I can say about people who just trust what the TV says is …... actually I can't think of an answer to that there is nothing good I can say about them!
REMEMBER C02 in atmosphere is 0.04% and if it drops below 0.02 plant life will start to die, if that happens we will start to die.
Did they just pull this woman in from the street!
Oh look a bureaucrat who doesn't actually know anything. 🤷♂️
But they had to get a woman with a generational connection to the land, or something. 😂
She an Indian (Native American). And YES, she knows NOTHING.
How come the Raven and the wolf didn’t whisper to her about the climate.
@@MrMicronano still trying to help her ancestors discover the wheel
There are many Native Americans that would be outstanding in these positions, just not any that smart that meet the Progressives membership requirements of worshiping the Obama mantra, as stated by him in 2009, "The Fundamental Changing of America", i.e. Globalization.
its like watching a never ending car accident, how did someone like her get in charge of anything?
Ticking a box, that's how.
Got that right
0.04% - if it falls to 0.02%, plants and trees will die.
It's pumped into greenhouses to make the plants grow.
I know, it's crazy! 🤷
That's simply not true. It's been as low as 180 ppm and plants didn't die.
@@JJRM8
Pre-industrial levels were around 280 ppm and today they are around 420 ppm.
I can't find anything to back up your statement - anywhere.
@@ajs3994
Precisely - then they give us back even more oxygen.
@@JJRM8 "as low as 180 ppm" yes, 150 is the plant death threshold. and earth was a barren ice covered wasteland with near starving plant life
This is the result of hiring by checking off boxes as opposed to experience, qualifications and competence.
Note: There isn't a 'drought' of water in the Walmarts and grocery stores and Cost Co's where there are skids and skids of water being sold...also all of the water being moved to the deserts for people in du bai and other places where people are living in the friggin DESERTS in luxury!! WTF!!!!
"Just from the hip, ma'am" and her awkwardness FLOORED me!!!
Why do we allow non elected people to develop and enforce laws? Where is Congress?
Congress empowered these clown in the 1950’s, with “Empowering legislation”. So congress can “Blame” the very bureaucrats the created. Sad,sad, sad.
Dude, enforcement is literally the job of the executive branch. Tell me didn't read the constitution without telling me you didn't read the constitution
collecting the money they get in envelopes.
Wow. She can’t answer a single question.
wont answer
Why does the US have these committee meetings, rarely do the witnesses know the subject matter of the organisations they preside over. And nothing ever seems to happen.
I think that's the whole idea.
Her cronies thought it was funny. That they are destroying everything which makes you worry that the people really in charge have some dreadfully goal in mind. Thankyou for that question would ordinarily mean a gift to the witness, that it floors these idiots tells you everything.
Another member of the “ fake it till you make it “ fraternity …
Unfortunately, they NEVER make it so they just continue to FAKE IT!
It's ridiculous the people that are striving for Net Zero don't know and the panel joke about hearing before CO2 is 0.04% of the atmosphere like it's a joke and doesn't matter and just "reduce CO2 reduce CO2" . They don't even realise CO2 is not a problem AT ALL ! At 0.02% there would be world famine and at 0.015% all the plants die so problem fixed.
Even now farmers pump CO2 into their greenhouses to get the plants to grow faster.
The fact is plants like CO2 . At higher CO2 levels plants require less water so would be able to encroach onto desert areas. It's all round good.
Before anyone replies "greenhouse gas" . CO2 isn't a very good greenhouse gas it's effect compared to like clouds is infinitely small. In fact it we doubled the CO2 in the atmosphere tomorrow apart from better growing plants you wouldn't even notice .
But then all that's just facts which doesn't effect policy !
Yup and in fact the fact that plants like it will mean that plants will grow bigger to match the CO2 and out consume what we produce! The whole environmentalist movement is a scam to prey on the less informed. Green products are a multi billion dollar industry. Tell me they arent paying these politicians off and I will laugh in your face.
But Eugenicists Love It , don't you Bill Gates and WEF, UN .
I love that my previous comment got removed for saying that the higher carbon dioxide would help the plants outpace our co2 emissions and it wouldnt be a problem. Guess I did also say that its a billion dollar industry and people are clearly paid off too. Makes you wonder about googles motives if theyre taking down that comment.
That's nonsense. CO2 levels have increased by fifty percent in the Industrial Era due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions and is increasing by 3 ppm a year. There's no shortage of CO2.
saying that CO2 is not a good greenhouse gas compared to water vapor ( and methane ) is true . but that is kind of like saying that rattlesnake poison is a poor poison compared to botulism toxin. Both CO2 and rattlesnake venom only have to be a certain level of "good" to cause a dangerous effect. The prediction for doubling CO2 is roughly a 1 to 4 degree Celsius average increase in Global surface temps. Think about how much heat must be added to the oceans, the air the land, to raise the average temperature of a planet by even 1 degree fahernheit. I get that 1 - 4 degrees rise in temp doesn't seem scary at al. Seems like a minor thing, if you don't understand the difference between heat and temperature ( 9th grade physical science should have got us there ) Climate change is much more about heat stored in air land and water than the actual temp. 1 - 4 degrees also seems minor because the effect takes time to happen. There are all kinds of tipping point effects that can unleash other warming agents... One example is the Right now permafrost keeps millions of tons of Methane from being released into the atmosphere. Methane is a far more potent greenhouse gas than CO2. A fool considers tipping the first domino in a series of dominoes as a self contained event , like it falling over is all that will happen. The effects of increasing greenhouse gasses are reasonably predictable. But yes, let's bequeath to our great grandchildren Another bill for them to pay. and when they ask why we tipped the first domino? Well who cares? we got ours... and probably won't even be around to answer.
Another proud brandon appointee. Welcome to brandon's build back better save democracy.
Jeez these things are always the same. Put an actor in the chair, they pretend to not hear/not understand/be incompetent and the end result is nobody is held to account.
What a waist of time asking this person anything. She probably got her job by NOT questioning so don’t expect her to have any insight.
About 400ppm or 0.04% of which only 3% of the sum total is man made or 12ppm with the remaining 388ppm due to natural Earth functions.
Not even close, but sounds nice when you say it lol
@@overkillx7what are the numbers then?
You are wrong about the man made component
@@emoryhill4087man made 5% :) It is still a minor number. All CO2 climate changing THEORY is a lie!
They really don't come any dumber than this woman who's got this position. She truly needs to be fired and replaced
Deb Haaland is in tune with nature and need only listen to the ground to understand the environment.
What amazing timing for the time out....
Removing the hydro-electric power stations is absolutely ridiculous... 😒
No it's not. Climate fear mongering along with dangerous cow, dangerous farms will cause food problems which will cause a population decrease and that's they want no matter what because someone decided that we are too many. Hydro has no impact on climate but banning heating at all options including wood and coal will make heating illegal. Problem is that they ignore what people want or need, ignoring protests and do what they want or follow corporations, wef or foundations orders. Everything about money is that they own doctors, scientists, experts which tell us how to live, eat, drink or wash hands. This stops only when people stop talking their money and care more about their life and interests. In the end all traitors will pay because some don't think, others care only about money but they're only tools and will be sacrificed when time comes. Because nobody can live without air, water or food.
If i were questioning any witness, id start with "Do not thank me for my question. You thank me for my question, ill take it as you dont know or you dont want to answer"
DEI at work awesome! really inspiring a lot of confidence
“There was record moisture but the drought continues”
Only a politician can say this.
To be fair to the official being questioned, the person asking the questions seems to waffle endlessly about tangential factors before "asking" a rather open ended question.
Q. What am I to say ? A. WTF? Say about which of the many points you wandered past in the last three minutes ?
That being said Deb Haaland seems stunningly unprepared for this session. Recently appointed?
Not too hard to stump a Democratic box ticker.
We are so screwed.
Today they started on the 2nd of four dam removals on the Klamath River. They hope to have this one removed by the end of august. Yet all the salmon and fish are still breathing in the silt. That's just like human beings breathing in dust all day. The water being used for irrigation right now out of the Sacramento river is so silty it leaves a trail of silt coming out of every irrigation valve.
I was trying to think up some not so kind but truthful comments about this person but you all beat me to it.
My exact sentiment :)
When they thank the Senator or Congressmen for the question it just sounds like it will be followed with B/S
After watching this video and many others, where Congress (mainly republican) questions the various Dept. Secretaries of this Administration. It has become clear to me that there is a huge waste in Payroll going out, since NONE seem to actually do a job other than BS Congressional Hearings.
you got it. really sad
What the hell does that woman do?
The Didn't Earn It hire
To call this woman incompetent would be an Insult to incompetent people..
So if they are so concerned about the CO2 in the atmosphere, plant a forest to absorb it. What's the problem? It's a win-win.
Haven’t you heard…according to Billy the Gates forests cause global warming and need cutting down
Do you think they ever realize how unqualified and embarrassing they are? Maybe late in life even?
Democrat environmentalists are not. In the 1990s an environmental group finally won one of many lawsuits to remove an earthen dam. The dam was about 30 years old. It had created a lake which was a recreation site. Businesses had been built, a community was nearby. Wildlife filled the area. Nesting Bald Eagles hunted in the lake. But they won finally. The lake was drained and the dam was destroyed. The values of homes plummeted, businesses failed without the lake, and wildlife struggled to survive. Let’s hear it for fake environmentalists.
Sounds like how Germanys environmentalists got the nuclear plants shut down and replaced with coal.
The German environmentalists who were funded by... Russian big coal. (It was a different, more peaceful age)
Tell the United Nations that I just climate changed in my pants 🤡
You keep proving they know nothing about the job, but they still have the job and making up laws that's ruining the country and everyone lives instead and not doing something about it.
This sort of incompetence seems to be a world wide epidemic. Australia has one of the best at the moment.
Same in Colombia
Numbers are hard.