The reporter’s inflection says so much. It’s not, “I’m not saying ANYTHIING …” it’s, “*** I’m *** not saying anything (but other people who I’m not going to name are, and I agree with them, so …).” 🤦🏻♂️
so... what about the lawsuits in Germany for hate speech on "his" platform... what does he have to say about that? oh yeah... the fines happen to be worth more than the company
The funny thing about the example thing is that if he doesn't have one he looks like an idiot but if he does have one it wouldn't technically mean anything because its purely anecdotal. However at the same time it would be easier to convince the listeners that it has merit because people are incredibly fallible to unrepresentative anecdotes.
Yep, contrast this “journalist’s” interview with “alt right youtuber conspiracy theorist” Tim Poole’s interview on Joe Rogan’s podcast with Twitter founder and his attorney. Tim Poole brought receipt after receipt and was incredibly prepared for the discussion. Yet we are told to trust and have faith in main stream media?!? Heavy skepticism is needed on EVERY media source to sift through the agendas, lies, AI crap and manipulation.
You're missing the point here. The guy said that his for you page had more hareful content. When you say that, you're gonna have to give an example. Representative or not is a different discussion, here they were talking about the guy's personal experience@@Gardor
@@GovernorTransalpineGaul I am not sure I understand what you are saying. I was talking about the argumentative quality vs the objective quality of giving an anecdote and argumentative winning conditions. The only information that matters is generally representative information, because any other information can be a random variation without meaning. The only way the interviewer could win this argument, regardless of what is actually true, would be to dump a ton of unrepresentative anecdotes on him, because they can be very persuasive. If the interviewer ever gave into the argument of representative statistics, then he immediately looses because Elon would likely be the primary arbiter of that argument because he has the data. If he gave into that argument, then all he can do is take his word for it. Winning is about convincing the audience. Just to be clear.
@@Gardor here the contention was that the journalist was straight up lying. He went for the unrepresentative anecdote argument regardless of whether that is objectively accurate, but he could not even back his anecdotal claim up. I think we agree on this, we are just choosing to focus on two different things
It just shows that you must absolutely not accept their rules and go on defense. Once you get defensive it's over. Matt Taibbi should've learned it. Instead of 'defending' yourself, which is useless anyway - just turn the tables and attack them, they have loads of skeletons in their own backyard.
Absolutely. These reporters continually pushing their 'myth' obviously on payroll to do that but pretend to be truth tellers , warmongering but blame Elon indirectly for hatemongering through twitter! Elon❤️💪
What I love about this is that the BBC reporter thought he would trap Elon Musk with simple questions and he massively underestimated Elon Musk’s intelligence and information on numerous different media subjects and got totally destroyed on camera.
Elon uses logic, the interviewer is using a script. And he didn’t practice for those responses because mainstream media expects people to conform to the barriers they have created. Lately Elon has been stomping all over those barriers and personally I can’t get enough. Somebody get this guy a sidekick cuz he’s a frickin super hero.
This BBC reporter is not prepared. Probably even fired afterwards. I can easily point out 3 examples of hateful tweets by Elon that has affected a specific race of people...
I've learned that being awkward causes discomfort in other people, if you embrace your own awkwardness and just don't care you gain an advantage in adversarial situations.
Definitely! "You said you haven't eaten any of the cookies and yet there are no cookies in the jar anymore, so what do you say about that?" "..." "...look dad it's not about the cookies"
Or a salesman getting caught following his manuscript 😂😂😂 But then they might end up cleaning the whole second floor of someone’s house, including the bedroom and the beds. To suddenly realize that they slipped on the banana peel they tried to get the homeowner on 😂😂😂
Bbc all staff are the same that women was like this man. Hit a women with machete😂😂. Who will actually bring it seriously or having a car makes a man misogynist
@@rainbowbloom575what? That made no sense, he is the one that is arguing for freedom of speech? You just don’t like Elon bc he doesn’t conform to your beliefs and the demands of one side.
They think people who vote different are poor, uneducated, dumb and racists. They think billionaires make too much money and shouldn't exist yet support pampered multi millionare celebrities. They want war with Russia. They want war with China and call Taiwan a colony despite the Falkland Islands, Puerto Rico and the American and French Samoan islands being colonies who get taxed and have no vote. These people have no friends outside their bubble, are the most hateful and hypocritical and think they have some type of high ground and are starting problems with everyone. They try to shut down everyone who disagrees with them even if it means violence, like the Nazi and communists. This actual modern-day fascism.
A producer provides the talking points and questions and most people are told in advance what the questions are. However I don’t think Musk needs any help from an incompetent reporter who thought he would use a ‘gotcha’ question and failed miserably.
@@kleec0203 back in the days, journalists were respected because they were good at their jobs. Nowadays, not a single one of them know what they are doing because don’t know what it is to think, they just accepted all the narrative that was pushed to them since journalism school.
@@zereimu maybe after the first time. Elon became condescending, basing the existence of hate on twitter on one person's ability to remember an example. Evidently the journalist struck a nerve about there being potential for misinformation or hate speech, Elon seemingly doesn't like hearing that for whatever reason e.g. doesn't agree. Hence, he interrupts the interviewer a lot.
He's not dismantling anything and he's being extremely disingenuous. I almost feel sorry for people who watch this and mistake Musk's brazen disingenuousness for some sort of logical and rigorous deconstruction of what the journalist is saying. It's one deflection after another deflection after another deflection. It's almost embarrassingly unsophisticated for a guy as smart as I'm guessing that Musk is. What is the journalist supposed to say when Musk asks for specific examples of hateful content he has seen? So, on the spot, in a matter of seconds, you need to remember specific tweets with their specific words or otherwise your argument gets invalidated? I am pretty sure I read a lot of political content every day, and if you put me on the spot and asked me to provide examples I probably wouldn't be able to bring up anything specific from one or two or any number of days before, let alone in the middle of an interview. In fact, chances are I won't even remember writing this comment a couple of days from now. So what? So what, really? The whole argument is that maybe the journalist is being dishonest because he can't remember specific examples? Wasn't the discussion about a general increase in this kind of content? So who cares about any specific examples and why is the focus on whether the journalist can remember them? (that's one pretty obvious deflection for you there). I don't know, in general it just bothers me when this kind of behavior passes for intelligent or sophisticated. At the beginning of the video Musk also disputes the notion of misinformation and who is supposed to decide what is information and what is misinformation. Oh wow. If only you were an engineer, Mr. Musk, and you knew of the existence of something called facts, if only there was a measurable reality. If only you were sending rockets to space and you could do the math and know when something is going to fly and when it isn't. Because this is not a discussion about ideologies, it's not like it has ever been about referring to people's opinions as misinformation. It's about non truths being presented as truths because there is something to gain from it politically. But, again, if only you were a man of science who could tell the difference between fact and fiction, right?
I wish people didnt make a joke of this and laugh like its a serious serious crime against everyones rights. Realistically there should be a petition or more to have them removed and their license to post real credible information removed.
These are drones that think that by using buzzwords like "hate speech" and "misinformation" they instantaneously get a gotcha moment on people. They live in the woke authoritarian bubble.
He didn't even genuinely know how long the BBC has been spreading falsehoods. Founded 1922. He was right by guessing , unconvincingly: "... whatever it is a hundred year history ... "
He couldn't talk over Elon. Dude had to stop , or elon would have walked. That's how they wipe the floor with people they can overpower. And they're trained to do it well.
What, you didn't know that they're all weasels trying to appeal to the most weak minded people in society, by cowardly appearing mentally immature while insulting as many rational thinking groups of people as they can? ... You didn't know that they're Satan...?
he calls everyone a liar, he's usually wrong or ignores context as he usually does about a lot of things. But sorry keep blindly worshiping this egomaniac! so gullible
@@SaiyanPride24 I think a lot of political problems come from the existance of left and right that go to the extreme, I'am not saying you think like what I'am about to describe, because obviusly I don't know you. But here in my country a lot of issues come from the fact that the right wing comes up with a proposal for something that is good and the left deny it, just because it came from the right and not because of logical thinking like if it was the kindergarten. Thenk 1 or 2 years later the left will come up with the exact same proposal, pretend like they are the authors and aprove it with 1-2 years of delay. For me this only creates social and economy problmes that should not be there in the first place.
When you have to explain how free speech works to a representative of the BBC. And then a demonstration how free speech exposes propagandists. Thank you again, Mr. Musk.
100%! Musk was bang on the money when he asked "Who decides what is misinformation?". The value of free speech is that every man has the right to hear others and decide the truth for himself. A group that makes themselves the arbiter of truth and silences what they dictate is false is the enemy of freedom. The dictatorship of 'truth' prevents the discovery of truth.
This was delightful. I’m so tired of woke and I’m part of this so called elite. Good on Elon Musk. He’s stumbling all over himself and started stuttering. Just another parrot trap ting a narrative.
Because the interviewer is supposed to be asking the questions but Musk is deflecting and refusing to answer anything. It's pretty common tactic used by politicians that don't want to admit fault. *edit* Hate speech on twitter can be quantified by Anti semitic tweets doubling and a 70% increase in ISIS accounts after Musk takeover. This journo is bad at his job but Musk sounds pathetically in denial by refusing to address this problem. Please read through the comments before replying to me I've had 20+ of the same low IQ take.
Why do you think there are no improvised Q&A between Presidents & the public where they have to answer the questions. I'm talking events that aren't "controlled" and the questions known before it even starts. Because the public is gonna eat them alive and all they'll be able to answer when the uncomfortable questions hit is "it's a matter of national security" or "it's classified" or some lie.
Problem is NOT ALL are as witty, smart, wise, and a quick thinker as Elon Musk. This guy is playing checkers while Elon is playing Chess with him. Elon has GREAT Memory too and he picks up on the interviewer's mistakes and attacks it Brilliantly.
I dont think FElon knows as much as he thinks, this is why he has a army of lawyers to get him out of the trouble he is constantly creating even with this interview What speech isn't protected by the First Amendment? Only that expression that is shown to belong to a few narrow categories of speech is not protected by the First Amendment. The categories of unprotected speech include obscenity, child pornography, DEFAMATORY SPEECH, false advertising, true threats, and fighting words. calling him a liar is DEFAMATORY SPEECH, because he couldn't provide an example on the spot... after he says he hasn't been on the app for a prolonged period... because he got defensive and attacked the interviewer
He is not a Reporter...he is a puppet Parrot of left wing Propaganda....Elon Musk is About the Truth...and as he has stated "Take the Red Pill' which is now on the FBI's watch list of words as leftest are all about Killing Free Speech/ taking away your Right to bear arms/ Manipulating elections / Over Taxing us to Death/ Wide Open Borders/ as they push there Socialist ideology ....when it is FACT Socialism has Never Worked in Mankind's History anywhere in the World....Socialist like Marxist Communist and Fascist all OPPOSE a Free Market....Vote Dem ALL OUT!
Elon speaks like a bussines man and actually wants to hear what this guy doesnt like so he could improve it if he finds out that reporter was in right or something, but the reporter choked hard
Similar to nearly every interview of Jordan Peterson. Reporter shows up with every intention of being "the one". Turns into their worst day ever on the job.
Yes, it is savage, as in monkey savage, and completely irrelevant. You're dealing with an entity scoring cheap rhetorical points by using common expressions in meaningless contexts. And you admire that. You didn't expect to have to think now, did ya?
@@karl5173 Your TDS is showing ;) Set up your straw man, I'll ignore it. Elon got RIGHT to the point, and the best part is that the BBC proved him RIGHT by editing out these bits 🤣 Your lack of credulity in its relevance doesn't negate it at all... lol. Go find a safe space.
@@karl5173 what? the point of that was to show the hypocrisy of that media alongside the ones who control it and who claim they are the "arbitraries of truth", the ones who YOU follow yourself blindly instead of thinking with your own brain, you should take the advice of "having to think" and using it yourself sometimes
This is a perfect example of why people don't trust journalists anymore. This guy is terrible at his job. Journalists should be seeking truth and not coming in with a bias and/ or agenda.
This guy was so lost that it seemed as though Mr. Musk is conducting an interview and not the other way around. Well done, media needs to be put in its place
"Mr Musk" wants to put chips in your brain and is an essential piece of the NW puzzle of world domination and real-life Matrix. Realize who he is. He's the new Bill Gates and he's part of the cabal.
This “reporter” is a living example of why policing speech is bad. Listen to how scared he is to to answer a question openly and honestly. There’s no real conversation.
You should watch some Congressional hearings about the Twitter files & censorship of social media. Democrats have been exposed. You'd think their constituents would be outraged, or want to stop it. No! They harass & defame witnesses, ignore evidence & change the topic. It's like the entire Democrat party are IN ON IT. (Wink,wink) BTW, they are. Dr Shiva Ayyudurai exposed their censorship & election tampering & WON in court.
So why did Musk ban 10 journalist accounts on December 15, 2022 if he’s such an advocate for free speech? Oh, because that’s just the bullshit he feeds all of you to make you feel better. lol
absolutely Bang on, and when we have generations who have grown up being told they can be anything they want and do anything they want, only to get the realisation that it's not necessarily how the world works...... they detonate.
@@AdamHKatona yes. Emotional people are considered more intelligent and better socialized than rationalists. The truth is, that they are closer to animals the other party. Controlling our emotions and accepting a truth even if we don't like it is a human thing only.
@@TiltyFishPokerI think that's also down to them saying they participated in the recruiting of camgirls themself. It's actually a pretty bad example you're just throwing out there based on your own feelings towards the Tate brothers I'm assuming. I get some people hate them unproportionally, but someone who broadcasts themselves as a guy who uses weak women to their own advantage is a scumbag whether he did it or not in my opinion. I could care less about his political opinions.
"You just lied." The beauty of that comment is that he points out that the BBC reporter himself just committed misinformation whilst accusing Elon Musk of spreading misinformation, but I'm sure that went over his head.
Exactly, they just want to limit speech they don’t like. It’s a very human proclivity. That is why we have the limiting principle of free speech. It should ensure that no one group or entity becomes the arbiter of what can be said, much less the arbiter of truth.
Saying he's seen a rise in hateful speech, then stating he can't give an example because he's stopped using that feed! Elon is the king of pointing out the lying hypocrites!
Holy shit Elon just tore that guy down and basically said "I'm the interviewer now. What about BBC's misinformation on COVID?" and just shoved it all back in his face. This is how we fight this era of lacking "money first, facts later" journalism, just call them out on their BS and be unresponsive
The network forces them to do it. The journalist knows it is career suicide, but otherwise the network doesn't get views. They justify it to the journalist by saying half the country will love you for this. Take it from an ex-creative marketing executive of a local station and now CTO of a medical conglomerate... It's a cesspool... It's a form of "Access Journalism" that goes against all journalistic standards.
BBC (Broadcasting British Colonialism) has completed its metamorphosis from a cruel Colonialist Channel to a intrusive obstructionist Channel. The mouth piece of a thieving robber of a country which oppressed and killed millions over the centuries is now lecturing pretty much everyone else on human rights. The colonial white man arrogance..
@@nuskyahmad6375 He wasn't deflecting, he was challenging the validity of the question. If someone asks you why you don't stop committing crimes, are you deflecting when you ask that person for *any* evidence that you have actually committed a crime?
Pointing out the truth confidently and consistently tends to have that effect. At least the interviewer was a nice person. For all that he was evidently woke and thought he had the moral upper ground with which he thought he could bury Elon with, at least he didn't embarrass himself by resorting to shouting random, nonsensical insults at Elon. As is the common ending to a discussion when these neo-liberals are faced with facts they don't like.
Don't mind me, just gonna rant for a second. He _figuratively_ mopped the floor with him. Then again, Google added an informal definition of "literally" to also mean "really really a whole lot" which I guess was done in response to its overuse (which I find ridiculous because words shouldn't also mean the opposite of their definitions but whatever) so maybe it's time for me to give in already. Regardless, Elon killed this dude. No contest. 😂
WOW SIR VERY DANGEROUS !😠😠 I WILL NEVER MEET ELON MUSK! 😠 BUT THIS IS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA 🤗🇮🇳 THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD , WE NEVER DO SCAM AND WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗
They confuse 'hate speech' with speech they hate.
Hate speech is merely honesty, they can't handle the honest truths.
Exactly. If your opinion doesn’t match theirs, it’s “hate speech” or “misinformation.”
YES!
🎯
They need to change their feelings just because they don’t agree with something. Snowflake society
RIP to this guy’s career in journalism.
RIP to the entirety of legacy media.
And his pride, dignity, and credibility.
The libtards will twist it around and make him a hero
@@willer3399 And credibility, most of all, is incredibly difficult for a journalist to earn back.
Was it ever really alive?
"I'm not stuck in here with you. You're stuck in here with me."
Rorschach💪
"I am the one, who knocks!"
I'm sure both of them can leave whenever they want
You get to leave on my terms!
🤣🤣🤣
When your called out face blank!... there's nowhere to go for the interviewer 🤯
“Let’s move on” every journalist’s favourite words whenever cross questioned
“I’m not saying anything” is the realest thing a journalist has ever said.
🤣 fact
hahaha!
what if its " I can't say anything"
Relax! It's a scripted interview.
The reporter’s inflection says so much. It’s not, “I’m not saying ANYTHIING …” it’s, “*** I’m *** not saying anything (but other people who I’m not going to name are, and I agree with them, so …).” 🤦🏻♂️
More people need to hold the media to standards like this.
so... what about the lawsuits in Germany for hate speech on "his" platform... what does he have to say about that?
oh yeah... the fines happen to be worth more than the company
Most people don’t have FU money to say whatever they want to some of the most powerful people on earth
@@bobshagit-io8lq Why didn't the interviewer ask that question?
@@bobshagit-io8lq There's no such thing as "hate speech". You either support free speech or you support government censorship.
@@bobshagit-io8lq Of course there is hate speech, but it's hilarious how he couldn't give even on example. LOL
It is shocking how people involved in such huge conversations are not prepared for a simple "give me an example" question.
The funny thing about the example thing is that if he doesn't have one he looks like an idiot but if he does have one it wouldn't technically mean anything because its purely anecdotal. However at the same time it would be easier to convince the listeners that it has merit because people are incredibly fallible to unrepresentative anecdotes.
Yep, contrast this “journalist’s” interview with “alt right youtuber conspiracy theorist” Tim Poole’s interview on Joe Rogan’s podcast with Twitter founder and his attorney.
Tim Poole brought receipt after receipt and was incredibly prepared for the discussion.
Yet we are told to trust and have faith in main stream media?!? Heavy skepticism is needed on EVERY media source to sift through the agendas, lies, AI crap and manipulation.
You're missing the point here. The guy said that his for you page had more hareful content. When you say that, you're gonna have to give an example. Representative or not is a different discussion, here they were talking about the guy's personal experience@@Gardor
@@GovernorTransalpineGaul I am not sure I understand what you are saying.
I was talking about the argumentative quality vs the objective quality of giving an anecdote and argumentative winning conditions.
The only information that matters is generally representative information, because any other information can be a random variation without meaning.
The only way the interviewer could win this argument, regardless of what is actually true, would be to dump a ton of unrepresentative anecdotes on him, because they can be very persuasive. If the interviewer ever gave into the argument of representative statistics, then he immediately looses because Elon would likely be the primary arbiter of that argument because he has the data. If he gave into that argument, then all he can do is take his word for it.
Winning is about convincing the audience. Just to be clear.
@@Gardor here the contention was that the journalist was straight up lying. He went for the unrepresentative anecdote argument regardless of whether that is objectively accurate, but he could not even back his anecdotal claim up.
I think we agree on this, we are just choosing to focus on two different things
Gotta love this reporter gravely concerned about the spread of misinformation while spreading it himself. Textbook example of hypocrisy.
Elon slaughtered this "journalist", simply by asking for an example.
Elon: Could you explain what your position even is?
Journalist: IMPLODES
they are not used to being challenged only they can give questions and only they get to say whats truth
He transformed into Porky Pig before our eyes.
Urinalist
aaa aa i , let's move on😂😂
It literally stuns these people that someone may question the narrative they are pushing.
Because they live in an echo chamber
He's been brainwashed
This is an absolute car crash😮😢
That's because they are used to most people not asking probing questions--but rather going along to get along.
It just shows that you must absolutely not accept their rules and go on defense. Once you get defensive it's over. Matt Taibbi should've learned it. Instead of 'defending' yourself, which is useless anyway - just turn the tables and attack them, they have loads of skeletons in their own backyard.
Absolutely. These reporters continually pushing their 'myth' obviously on payroll to do that but pretend to be truth tellers , warmongering but blame Elon indirectly for hatemongering through twitter! Elon❤️💪
He hit dude with the " name 10 books"😂
*1
not even close. He said "i saw," Elon simply asked "what did you see?"
What I love about this is that the BBC reporter thought he would trap Elon Musk with simple questions and he massively underestimated Elon Musk’s intelligence and information on numerous different media subjects and got totally destroyed on camera.
Elon uses logic. The reporter uses emotion
Did you see how red his nose was at the start of the video? 😅
Like a true republican’ logic and a lib, all emotion.
Elon uses logic, the interviewer is using a script. And he didn’t practice for those responses because mainstream media expects people to conform to the barriers they have created. Lately Elon has been stomping all over those barriers and personally I can’t get enough. Somebody get this guy a sidekick cuz he’s a frickin super hero.
@@dylandunn4969
Elon was a complete disaster, it's very obvious he had no script 🤣
You 100% hit it right on the nail!
Love that Elon is not afraid of awkwardness. Just goes for the kill.
So brutally true. I always try to give someone a chance. Elon just stuns them speechless, then presses for what they can't give...logic.
Get this BBC guy some diapers!!!
This BBC reporter is not prepared. Probably even fired afterwards.
I can easily point out 3 examples of hateful tweets by Elon that has affected a specific race of people...
That is the beauty of having a bit of Asperger syndrome...lol
I've learned that being awkward causes discomfort in other people, if you embrace your own awkwardness and just don't care you gain an advantage in adversarial situations.
This interview never gets old. I will always watch this.
when I'm bored I watch this video again and feel comfortable
It’s like watching a parent catch their child lying...
Dad, can we just move forward
Definitely!
"You said you haven't eaten any of the cookies and yet there are no cookies in the jar anymore, so what do you say about that?"
"..."
"...look dad it's not about the cookies"
He is mentally still a child, he didn’t knew if Elon was asking him the questions in this 1 on 1 interview, too funny! 😂
V dad vibes
Or a salesman getting caught following his manuscript
😂😂😂
But then they might end up cleaning the whole second floor of someone’s house, including the bedroom and the beds.
To suddenly realize that they slipped on the banana peel they tried to get the homeowner on
😂😂😂
This man's career flashed before his eyes so many times 😂
Hahaha yep!
Ex career
Lol omg yes! I did not know this amount of stuttering was possible! 😂
@@df7665 Just hold Trudeau's beer.
Not really, MSM is full of these kind of people reporters, they love him.
“This isn’t an interview about the BBC.”
“Oh you thought it wasn’t?”
Top 10 anime cold moments 💀
Wow he cleaned his clock with facts
The BBC has looked absolutely ridiculous lately. Andrew Tate and this...wow.
I was just thinking the exact same thing when both interviewers thought questions can't go both ways
Bbc all staff are the same that women was like this man. Hit a women with machete😂😂. Who will actually bring it seriously or having a car makes a man misogynist
Exactly, if this guy is their best to pullup for the interview with Elon Musk, Imagine the rest :D
Crazy they did this then did it again with Tate.
i have believed media outlets always lie even if its small they almost lie on every post. This is them being caught in one of their lies.
its insane that people tried to boycott this man for trying to revive free speech
malign is perhaps a better word
free speech as long as you dont critisize him
Yeah. Well. People are insane and illogical as a whole. Sucks.
@@lukas72703 whos stopping you or not allowing you to critisize him?
It is insane. The psyop is clearly working… 😪
Man’s heart rate went from 80 to 150 in a couple seconds.. 😂
the guy had no answer then hit with the classic "oh are you asking me?"
This right here is the difference between someone that thinks freely and someone that only knows what they are told.
Bingo
The one who thinks freely has the freedom to limit other people's freedom
@@rainbowbloom575but is choosing not to do it despite the pressure
@@rainbowbloom575what? That made no sense, he is the one that is arguing for freedom of speech? You just don’t like Elon bc he doesn’t conform to your beliefs and the demands of one side.
@@rainbowbloom575 but isn't, so ur statement is meaningless, lol, u seem about as smart as the journalist, haha, and that's not a compliment
Perfect example of how the media follow talking points without actually knowing what they are talking about
They think people who vote different are poor, uneducated, dumb and racists.
They think billionaires make too much money and shouldn't exist yet support pampered multi millionare celebrities.
They want war with Russia.
They want war with China and call Taiwan a colony despite the Falkland Islands, Puerto Rico and the American and French Samoan islands being colonies who get taxed and have no vote.
These people have no friends outside their bubble, are the most hateful and hypocritical and think they have some type of high ground and are starting problems with everyone.
They try to shut down everyone who disagrees with them even if it means violence, like the Nazi and communists.
This actual modern-day fascism.
Just like global leaders 🇨🇦
A producer provides the talking points and questions and most people are told in advance what the questions are. However I don’t think Musk needs any help from an incompetent reporter who thought he would use a ‘gotcha’ question and failed miserably.
Societal problem, proper education and research needs to be encouraged much more than it has been.
That’s EXACTLY what’s going on here.
It’s amazing that more people don’t pick up on that
imagine winning a discussion vs the smartest man alive. poor lad
The "you weren't expecting that" at the end 😂😂😂
This interview was the best example of going into an interview without any preparation and just a phone full of “gotcha” questions that mean nothing
Everything this reporter said was meaningless, had no substance behind it and he’s getting paid for it.
He only asked the questions he had been told to ask. This is culture of brainwashing cooperation.
@@kleec0203 and with my license fee money😡
@@kleec0203 back in the days, journalists were respected because they were good at their jobs. Nowadays, not a single one of them know what they are doing because don’t know what it is to think, they just accepted all the narrative that was pushed to them since journalism school.
@@SarahBakewell-pq7pb Silly you for subscribing to the BBC, this guy sums up every problem our once great country has. Utter Dick
Prime example when a journalist doesn't expect to be challenged on their own questions
Sounds like CNN
Entitlement
@@shanew7361 It's all mainstream media, these days.
Elon got dunked on so hard lol
@@deezclowns2462 what you been smoking?
I haven’t seen that reported since lmao
This is not an argument- it’s contradiction!
He's dismantling the interviewer without even getting aggressive or hostile.
@BILLY BOSBY No, he was asking very valid questions.
It’s amazing to watch! Just ask detailed questions and seek for clarity and usually the person will crumble.
@@zereimu maybe after the first time. Elon became condescending, basing the existence of hate on twitter on one person's ability to remember an example. Evidently the journalist struck a nerve about there being potential for misinformation or hate speech, Elon seemingly doesn't like hearing that for whatever reason e.g. doesn't agree. Hence, he interrupts the interviewer a lot.
Unfortunately Musk is also a liar. He's banned people who say things he doesn't like, particularly when it's about him.
He's not dismantling anything and he's being extremely disingenuous. I almost feel sorry for people who watch this and mistake Musk's brazen disingenuousness for some sort of logical and rigorous deconstruction of what the journalist is saying. It's one deflection after another deflection after another deflection. It's almost embarrassingly unsophisticated for a guy as smart as I'm guessing that Musk is.
What is the journalist supposed to say when Musk asks for specific examples of hateful content he has seen? So, on the spot, in a matter of seconds, you need to remember specific tweets with their specific words or otherwise your argument gets invalidated? I am pretty sure I read a lot of political content every day, and if you put me on the spot and asked me to provide examples I probably wouldn't be able to bring up anything specific from one or two or any number of days before, let alone in the middle of an interview. In fact, chances are I won't even remember writing this comment a couple of days from now. So what?
So what, really? The whole argument is that maybe the journalist is being dishonest because he can't remember specific examples? Wasn't the discussion about a general increase in this kind of content? So who cares about any specific examples and why is the focus on whether the journalist can remember them? (that's one pretty obvious deflection for you there).
I don't know, in general it just bothers me when this kind of behavior passes for intelligent or sophisticated. At the beginning of the video Musk also disputes the notion of misinformation and who is supposed to decide what is information and what is misinformation. Oh wow. If only you were an engineer, Mr. Musk, and you knew of the existence of something called facts, if only there was a measurable reality. If only you were sending rockets to space and you could do the math and know when something is going to fly and when it isn't. Because this is not a discussion about ideologies, it's not like it has ever been about referring to people's opinions as misinformation. It's about non truths being presented as truths because there is something to gain from it politically. But, again, if only you were a man of science who could tell the difference between fact and fiction, right?
Lol all of a sudden he wanted to move on once he knew he was getting exposed
When he got stumped he backed pedaled and tried to strike with another statement and failed like 4 times forcing him to change the topic haha
I wish people didnt make a joke of this and laugh like its a serious serious crime against everyones rights. Realistically there should be a petition or more to have them removed and their license to post real credible information removed.
@@austin7118 the petition never does anything, you take action instead
Dignifying moderation when it's pure censorship is a virtuous thing for this journalist
Exactly!
If i get 1 dollar everytime the reporter says hate speech,i will be rich.
“ oh you thought it wasn’t? “ was instant kill.
A moment of silence for the Journalist that did not do any home work before talking to Elon Musk ☠
Zaptine.
musk = lab technician
"journo" = lab rat
These are drones that think that by using buzzwords like "hate speech" and "misinformation" they instantaneously get a gotcha moment on people. They live in the woke authoritarian bubble.
Did he even know who he is? Pitiful.
He didn't even genuinely know how long the BBC has been spreading falsehoods. Founded 1922. He was right by guessing , unconvincingly:
"... whatever it is a hundred year history ... "
No silence deserved, just laughter
He who asks the questions controls the conversation. This is a masterclass in journalism by Elon.
I think it's "He who asks the better questions" and Elon clearly won there
He couldn't talk over Elon. Dude had to stop , or elon would have walked.
That's how they wipe the floor with people they can overpower.
And they're trained to do it well.
word.
@@Ta2dwitetrash Yup, this is just Elon bullying some reporter. Was nasty person Elon is.
One must know the answers to the questions he gives as well in order to teach, or ask questions to learn more.
Elon musk isn't being interviewed he's interviewing him
"That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence"
I never saw an interviewer stutter so much it’s truly amazing
I talk fast and do stutter myself and I feel pretty good after watching that 😅
What, you didn't know that they're all weasels trying to appeal to the most weak minded people in society,
by cowardly appearing mentally immature while insulting as many rational thinking groups of people as they can?
...
You didn't know that they're Satan...?
@Billy Pribbo I watched the whole interview. That's not how I see the interview at all. You lefties are always so offended get over yourself
His mistake was giving in into becoming the interviewee. Elon played that well lol
This is what happens when they are not in bbc studio and someone not shouting out all instructions in their earpiece
I love Elon’s attitude. He calls the guy a liar in a friendly tone, with a smile. No anger. Perfect.
And keep calm, when he repeat the same question over again, that's so amazing. I would lose my manner already about such avoidance of this BBC clown.
Yeah, tge journalist went from "I saw..." to "...so..so..some people re...re..reported that..."
He owned that British twerp 😂
he calls everyone a liar, he's usually wrong or ignores context as he usually does about a lot of things. But sorry keep blindly worshiping this egomaniac! so gullible
@@famaccount479me too
My favourite NSM interview EVER!!! I’ve watched it so many times! The BBC got buried
wants to move on every time he is called out and has no answer
I'm so glad that someone is actually challenging double standards ....
musk has more double standards than 99.9999999% of ppl and a lot of power to do tons of bad stuff.
I'm Liberal as fuck and I stand 100% with Elon here. We need to speak up, we need to stand against these cowards
@@SaiyanPride24 I think a lot of political problems come from the existance of left and right that go to the extreme, I'am not saying you think like what I'am about to describe, because obviusly I don't know you. But here in my country a lot of issues come from the fact that the right wing comes up with a proposal for something that is good and the left deny it, just because it came from the right and not because of logical thinking like if it was the kindergarten. Thenk 1 or 2 years later the left will come up with the exact same proposal, pretend like they are the authors and aprove it with 1-2 years of delay.
For me this only creates social and economy problmes that should not be there in the first place.
@Saiyan in the Iron Mask wut
Couldn't understand the host he got nervous and was stuttering too dam much
Love the fact that Elon was never disrespectful yet had him sweating by just speaking truth.
Not even speaking truth, just asking questions and repeating
Truth is the antidote to narrative
@@rosemccartney1538which that bbc person could not answer
He asked him to think, which seems to be something that most people are incapable of nowadays.
yeah I'm kinda surprised the interviewer didn't storm out or take a swing at Elon. They quite often freak out when they get 'overloaded'. Love it.
Elon just turned the table around.
“Now I’m interviewing you”
BBC was typing his termination letter during the interview lol
Wow, I mean, I don't think I've ever seen a reporter get owned so hard in my life.
Trump's done it, too. So has Ben Shapiro and a few others. Always fun to see reporters get some of their own back.
Cathy Newman and Jordan Peterson springs to mind.
He was literally clutching his phone like it was life support.
almost literally DESTROYED
He is not a good reporter. His Generation is used to having shit handed to them hence relying on what some websites said.
When you have to explain how free speech works to a representative of the BBC. And then a demonstration how free speech exposes propagandists. Thank you again, Mr. Musk.
Well said.
Another example added to the giant pile of why free speech is integral to society
Britain doesn't have freedom of speech, it makes sense
100%! Musk was bang on the money when he asked "Who decides what is misinformation?". The value of free speech is that every man has the right to hear others and decide the truth for himself. A group that makes themselves the arbiter of truth and silences what they dictate is false is the enemy of freedom. The dictatorship of 'truth' prevents the discovery of truth.
That's why corporate media doesn't want free speech.
How hateful is the speech if you can't even remember 1 example for 2 weeks?
There will ALWAYS be false information. It’s YOUR responsibility to do your OWN research.
"This is not an interview about the BBC"
"Oh you thought it wasn't"
Legend
Interviewer is a fkg worm...
Hope they're paying him well because he just dug his own grave.
Exactly!! It absolutely IS about BBC! And all the left wing media!!
Elon sounding more like Sam Hyde everyday. This is just like the Idubbbz Sam Hyde interview lol.
This was delightful. I’m so tired of woke and I’m part of this so called elite. Good on Elon Musk. He’s stumbling all over himself and started stuttering. Just another parrot trap ting a narrative.
Quick too!
It's amazing how asking direct questions is all it takes to completely dismantle almost every single media narrative.
And every republican talking point
Because the interviewer is supposed to be asking the questions but Musk is deflecting and refusing to answer anything. It's pretty common tactic used by politicians that don't want to admit fault.
*edit*
Hate speech on twitter can be quantified by Anti semitic tweets doubling and a 70% increase in ISIS accounts after Musk takeover. This journo is bad at his job but Musk sounds pathetically in denial by refusing to address this problem. Please read through the comments before replying to me I've had 20+ of the same low IQ take.
@@oceanshrugs9235 Depends.
@@teddypicker8799 you're such a willing tool, yes Elon is.the "bad" guy here.
Why do you think there are no improvised Q&A between Presidents & the public where they have to answer the questions. I'm talking events that aren't "controlled" and the questions known before it even starts. Because the public is gonna eat them alive and all they'll be able to answer when the uncomfortable questions hit is "it's a matter of national security" or "it's classified" or some lie.
Everything thats wrong with modern world summarized in 5mins conversation right here!
People are so flippant with their ideals of “hate”..
That they’re willing to give up their freedom without even the description
I love that Elon can comfortably sit in awkward silence while the other guy tries to figure out how to dig out of the mess he has made
The awkward silence Elon allows the idiot to have to play himself is legendary🤌🤣🤣🤣🤣
He probably has practice with employees in a similar predicament.
Dig that grave for yourself you stuttering silly interviewer.
What a fool while Elon is cool.
It's because he's autistic lol.
Who is John Galt
This is how people need to handle these interviewers. Not a one way street but rather a return of fire
Problem is NOT ALL are as witty, smart, wise, and a quick thinker as Elon Musk. This guy is playing checkers while Elon is playing Chess with him. Elon has GREAT Memory too and he picks up on the interviewer's mistakes and attacks it Brilliantly.
This Journalist is garbage, anyone who actually has a clue should be able to dunk on the arguements Elon is making here.
@@1flash3571 It helps to hang with Jordan Peterson.
@@stanislouse4168 a drug addict who praises the Israeli government
@@stanislouse4168 Jordan Peterson isn't in the same league, Musk deals with real things, Peterson is an unenlightened wanna self-help guru.
How are these people on a payroll?
Because the people that pay them think exactly like them
False knowledge is worse than hate or ignorance.
"Never try to destroy someone's character with a lie when yours can be destroyed with the truth"
Hit piece articles and character assassination through lies is a leftist media mainstay.
Fantastic❤
Who said that?
@@liamrmorgans921 Edward Nygma said it
Now those are some powerful words.
"This is not an interview about the BBC"
"Oh, you thought it wasn't?"
I loved that line. The tables had already turned, but he didn't receive the memo
... i ..i.. i.. lets move on !
GET EMMM! (METHOD MAN VOICE)
The fact that this video has 12M views and the like to dislike ratio is 396K likes to 105K dislikes is really concerning.
Ask yourself, who dictates what is hateful and are you really willing to give that power to someone.
And the main point of Musk's argument.
Elon conducted the interview very well. They should hire him to interview more people.
I'd pay to watch him do interviews on people
Would love to see him interview CNN.
Best comment
@@demystify2022CNN wouldn’t want that smoke
I dont think FElon knows as much as he thinks, this is why he has a army of lawyers to get him out of the trouble he is constantly creating
even with this interview
What speech isn't protected by the First Amendment?
Only that expression that is shown to belong to a few narrow categories of speech is not protected by the First Amendment. The categories of unprotected speech include obscenity, child pornography, DEFAMATORY SPEECH, false advertising, true threats, and fighting words.
calling him a liar is DEFAMATORY SPEECH, because he couldn't provide an example on the spot... after he says he hasn't been on the app for a prolonged period... because he got defensive and attacked the interviewer
This is what happens when you never question anything you’re told and only listen to one side of things… you end up like this reporter.
Yeah it's called liberalism and it's a mental disorder.
brainwashed and subjugated.
Exactly listen to one side with them no discussion or exchanges of idea what a BS
facttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttssssssssss.
He is not a Reporter...he is a puppet Parrot of left wing Propaganda....Elon Musk is About the Truth...and as he has stated "Take the Red Pill' which is now on the FBI's watch list of words as leftest are all about Killing Free Speech/ taking away your Right to bear arms/ Manipulating elections / Over Taxing us to Death/ Wide Open Borders/ as they push there Socialist ideology ....when it is FACT Socialism has Never Worked in Mankind's History anywhere in the World....Socialist like Marxist Communist and Fascist all OPPOSE a Free Market....Vote Dem ALL OUT!
Elon speaks like a bussines man and actually wants to hear what this guy doesnt like so he could improve it if he finds out that reporter was in right or something, but the reporter choked hard
Exactly
starts with banning "hate" speech then changing the definition of hate to ban whatever speech they want
Imagine getting an interview with Elon Musk for the sole purpose of making him look bad, and he just destroys you and the company you work for.
It’s not even like Elon is a social genius dudes pretty awkward. It’s amazing that a simple request for an example just break the guy
Similar to nearly every interview of Jordan Peterson. Reporter shows up with every intention of being "the one". Turns into their worst day ever on the job.
It's a company only in name. It's state sponsored media.
That's what happens when you pair an average idiot with a genius.
For once a youtube video title wasn't clickbait. Elon actually slaughtered that dude.
"I'm interviewing you, too. You weren't expecting that." Elon is a savage.
Yes, it is savage, as in monkey savage, and completely irrelevant. You're dealing with an entity scoring cheap rhetorical points by using common expressions in meaningless contexts. And you admire that. You didn't expect to have to think now, did ya?
Lmao 😂
@@karl5173 Your TDS is showing ;) Set up your straw man, I'll ignore it. Elon got RIGHT to the point, and the best part is that the BBC proved him RIGHT by editing out these bits 🤣 Your lack of credulity in its relevance doesn't negate it at all... lol. Go find a safe space.
@@karl5173 BBC reporter guy makes an alt defending himself, smh
@@karl5173 what? the point of that was to show the hypocrisy of that media alongside the ones who control it and who claim they are the "arbitraries of truth", the ones who YOU follow yourself blindly instead of thinking with your own brain, you should take the advice of "having to think" and using it yourself sometimes
Imagine what goes on behind the scenes with these media controllers?
This is a perfect example of why people don't trust journalists anymore. This guy is terrible at his job. Journalists should be seeking truth and not coming in with a bias and/ or agenda.
“You just lied” This needs to be said more often.
There’s your solution to misinformation. Whoever it is no matter what level “you just lied”
As opposed to Musk, who lies about EVERY SINGLE promise/claim he's EVER made. Gtfo
"No I didnt"
that of course only works, if they, indeed, have lied.
@@xXxXxX-x-XxXxXxobviously? Who wouldn’t think that?😂
Bruh people are always saying “that’s a lie” “that’s not true” blah blah blah
Elon literally gave that man a free pass to tell him everything twitter is doing wrong, and yet he couldn't even come up with one legit instance.
obviously you don't understand the meaning of the word literally
It was a fucking straw man dude!
Because this sad excuse of a journalist never expected that Elon or anyone else would question a leftist dogma.
@@sharky2675 apparently you are the one that doesn't understand the meaning.
Yes he did, he said that's what others were saying. He didn't give a personal example, but a zeitgeist example
This is me when teacher asks me questions when i haven't revised anything💀
Hahahahaha “let’s move on” because I’m full of crap says reporter
This guy was so lost that it seemed as though Mr. Musk is conducting an interview and not the other way around. Well done, media needs to be put in its place
"It seemed as though", HELL. Elon held the BBC's feet to the COALS.
It's Elon musk ..smart cookie
I loved that "Let's move on.." at 4.26..
"Mr Musk" wants to put chips in your brain and is an essential piece of the NW puzzle of world domination and real-life Matrix. Realize who he is. He's the new Bill Gates and he's part of the cabal.
"I'm interviewing you too, you weren't expecting that"
This “reporter” is a living example of why policing speech is bad. Listen to how scared he is to to answer a question openly and honestly. There’s no real conversation.
Start calling them what they are: propagandists
You should watch some Congressional hearings about the Twitter files & censorship of social media. Democrats have been exposed. You'd think their constituents would be outraged, or want to stop it. No! They harass & defame witnesses, ignore evidence & change the topic. It's like the entire Democrat party are IN ON IT.
(Wink,wink) BTW, they are. Dr Shiva Ayyudurai exposed their censorship & election tampering & WON in court.
@@Ohohhohoh His tone and body language was in shock it's so obvious
@@OhohhohohHate speech or speech you hate!
So why did Musk ban 10 journalist accounts on December 15, 2022 if he’s such an advocate for free speech? Oh, because that’s just the bullshit he feeds all of you to make you feel better. lol
Some people are not used to being around people who disagree with them.
That dude was no match for Elon
Few are. He's 20 steps ahead of everyone.
Indeed
Of course not, do you hear his accent
@@ipfreely3984 no he 's not..what elon id saying here ive know sonce I was a child...WTF
There's a reason elon is super wealthy and the other guy isn't.
Love how Elon stayed calm while the BBC reporter merely demonstrated how unprepared he was for a once in a lifetime interview.
he wasn't calm inside ..he was fuming inside
It's just an IQ 80 person vs an IQ 145 person...
@@Play4Vidathat doesnt matter, real men have strong emotions, they just control them to the outside
@@jasonwong7140 This isn't just a wet paper bag situation. IQ has very little weight on extremely poor arguments.
Apparently the reporter was given a 20 minute heads up
"I've experienced hateful content." "well actually that's what people are saying"
The real problem is people not being able to separate their feelings from facts.
Very true.
That is why everything can be hate speech nowadays.
Exactly. Good current example is those wanting the Tate brothers in jail because they don't like their personalities.
absolutely Bang on, and when we have generations who have grown up being told they can be anything they want and do anything they want, only to get the realisation that it's not necessarily how the world works...... they detonate.
@@AdamHKatona yes. Emotional people are considered more intelligent and better socialized than rationalists. The truth is, that they are closer to animals the other party. Controlling our emotions and accepting a truth even if we don't like it is a human thing only.
@@TiltyFishPokerI think that's also down to them saying they participated in the recruiting of camgirls themself. It's actually a pretty bad example you're just throwing out there based on your own feelings towards the Tate brothers I'm assuming.
I get some people hate them unproportionally, but someone who broadcasts themselves as a guy who uses weak women to their own advantage is a scumbag whether he did it or not in my opinion. I could care less about his political opinions.
"You just lied." The beauty of that comment is that he points out that the BBC reporter himself just committed misinformation whilst accusing Elon Musk of spreading misinformation, but I'm sure that went over his head.
The entire interview went over the BBC reporter's head.
BBC and misinformation. No surprise there.
Hee hee heee this is gleefull
Exactly, they just want to limit speech they don’t like. It’s a very human proclivity. That is why we have the limiting principle of free speech. It should ensure that no one group or entity becomes the arbiter of what can be said, much less the arbiter of truth.
Saying he's seen a rise in hateful speech, then stating he can't give an example because he's stopped using that feed! Elon is the king of pointing out the lying hypocrites!
The interviewer became the interviewee. Brilliant.
No ! You Sir shall listen ❤
Holy shit Elon just tore that guy down and basically said "I'm the interviewer now. What about BBC's misinformation on COVID?" and just shoved it all back in his face. This is how we fight this era of lacking "money first, facts later" journalism, just call them out on their BS and be unresponsive
He's in really good shape here.
That's how determined I imagine him as a boss. Now it makes more sense.
Clayton is a perfect example of how media bullying and corruption has wrecked science and hurt so many people.
The same way Western media pushes hate towards Russia and Russians with bias propaganda.
The network forces them to do it. The journalist knows it is career suicide, but otherwise the network doesn't get views. They justify it to the journalist by saying half the country will love you for this. Take it from an ex-creative marketing executive of a local station and now CTO of a medical conglomerate... It's a cesspool... It's a form of "Access Journalism" that goes against all journalistic standards.
The weak find power in numbers, but on their own they are weak.
Science has been hijacked by the Atheists... nobody trusts science anymore thanks mostly to Athiests
BBC (Broadcasting British Colonialism) has completed its metamorphosis from a cruel Colonialist Channel to a intrusive obstructionist Channel. The mouth piece of a thieving robber of a country which oppressed and killed millions over the centuries is now lecturing pretty much everyone else on human rights. The colonial white man arrogance..
If someone says something hateful that means we have the right to say our opinion about that hateful comment.
O'boy,,, 🤣🤣 this one escalated pretty fast, who is the interviewer & who is the onw getting interviewed.
He said “we’re not getting anywhere”.
I think this interview alone is a perfect example of getting somewhere
Translation: we 're not getting to where *I* want the conversation to go!
elon was using whataboutsim so much here, like freaking answer the questions instead of deflecting to bbc
@@nuskyahmad6375 he doesn't have to when the BBC is doing exactly the same, that was Elon's point. Don't throw rocks when you live in a glass house.
@@nuskyahmad6375 He wasn't deflecting, he was challenging the validity of the question.
If someone asks you why you don't stop committing crimes, are you deflecting when you ask that person for *any* evidence that you have actually committed a crime?
@@nuskyahmad6375 you got some real cognitive issues
The way he got the overconfident interviewer into stuttering nervous wreck is a masterclass.
Pointing out the truth confidently and consistently tends to have that effect. At least the interviewer was a nice person. For all that he was evidently woke and thought he had the moral upper ground with which he thought he could bury Elon with, at least he didn't embarrass himself by resorting to shouting random, nonsensical insults at Elon. As is the common ending to a discussion when these neo-liberals are faced with facts they don't like.
It's funny how the interviewer is the one stuttering.
😂😂😂 and that’s how it’s done
might i point out that your likes currently is at 666? you're not with us humans for sure.
@@lThellRocklit’s now at 778, so your accusation is a fail.
“I’m not saying anything” - yes, you’re correct ✅
hahaha
we are lucky to have witnessed a man like Elon in our lifetime
Absolutely!
Ok, this isn't even clickbait, Elon literally mopped the floor with him
Metaphorically*
Don't mind me, just gonna rant for a second.
He _figuratively_ mopped the floor with him. Then again, Google added an informal definition of "literally" to also mean "really really a whole lot" which I guess was done in response to its overuse (which I find ridiculous because words shouldn't also mean the opposite of their definitions but whatever) so maybe it's time for me to give in already.
Regardless, Elon killed this dude. No contest. 😂
James Clayton, trying saying this.
“Would you like pickles with that?”
This interview reveals much more than the interviewer can ever imagine nor never identify.
Absolute best way for someone to see their own fallacy, ask them questions and allow them to talk.
Always hold up a mirror to them and question them the same thing. It works all the time.
Doesn't work. Cognitive dissonance occurs and they change the subject. The interviewer has not seen his own fallacy, he's avoided discussing it.
Elon is no fool.😉
@@simongross3122 but people who watch it can
WOW SIR VERY DANGEROUS !😠😠 I WILL NEVER MEET ELON MUSK! 😠 BUT THIS IS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA 🤗🇮🇳 THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD , WE NEVER DO SCAM AND WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗
“That’s Absurd!” Is where I laughed out loud. 2 men sitting and having a dialogue. One is smarter than the other ..
“Name one example. U literally can’t name one”. Hate speech” just means “censorship”.