Why India uses T-90 and It's Most Advance version | हिंदी में
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- This is a video on Why India uses T-90 and It's Most Advance version
#T90 #India #defence
Website: thedefencematr...
Discord Link: / discord
Instagram Link: / defence_matrix
Twitter: / defencematrix1
Music : Art of Silence - by Uniq" is under a Creative Commons license (Creative Commons - International Recognition 4.0 - CC BY 4.0)
Intro Music : Credit Karl Casey @ White Bat Audio
*FAIR USE*
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
![ARGENTINA vs. CHILE [3-0] | RESUMEN | ELIMINATORIAS SUDAMERICANAS | FECHA 7](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/De3AWmXzhuA/mqdefault.jpg)
T-90 tanks ki performance Ukrain-Russia war me dikhi.
Isliye hame bhi Indian army ke tanks ko upgrade kar use karni chahiye.
so, basically in order to protect tanks against modern day threat library, you need something like a close-in weapons system that navies have on warships . . . putting that in perspective to a T-90S tank a 25 MM GAU-12/U six-barrel rotary gun slaved to a gunner's hatch on top of the T-90S turret that will automatically detect & engage incoming threat . . . not to mention active & passive countermeasures . . . turret top observation & gunner's hatch can be made of ballistic (armoured) grade aluminium in the interest of less weight . . . threaded anti-ballistic aluminium armour can improve protection & at the same time reduce a T-90M main battle tank's weight by as much as 35% . . .
Are you illiterate or do you need someone to point out everything wrong with the "modern day threat library" to you?
People saying. About Russian tanks performing poorly should also count Ukraine's tank losses the biggest win for the Russian tanks is they killed most of the Ukranian tanks with their APFSDS rounds from 80s whereas most of Russian tanks were killed by atgms and the number of Ukranian tank losses are much higher than Russian ones and also considering tanks obsolete is just a suit theory of keyboard generals who believe everything media says as the amount of fire power and support against bunkers and other fortified targets on battelfield drones can't do it how good they get if western tanks would have invaded in such a contested battelfield they would have performed even worst as they are bigger and are a easy prey for atgms compared to Russian tanks and the destroyed t 90 s in Ukraine are mostly destroyed by retreating Russian forces as if they fall in Ukraine Han they could pose a greater threat to more numerous types such as T72 B3 used in the conflict
True tight slap to keyboard warriors
If a person has to defend the russian army in an argument against Ukrainian army,
then that comparison in itself shows the russian army is not as powerful OR as good in war times AS it is thought to be.
One has to know that even if Russia wanted to elongate this conflict intentionally, they never wanted troops going rogue, retreating without order, getting captured and turned.
Even if the russian equipments that got destroyed is pretty world class, but men is what matters in a war.
Indian troops fought at heights where many helicopters can't go, and when injured, they preferred to fight and die instead of getting rescued by 2 more fighting troops that would have had to fallback to get him to a dispensary 3-4 miles downhill. NOW THAT'S A FIGHTING SPIRIT FOR YOUR OWN COUNTRY !
Russian troops have been shown to heavily lack this spirit, aane I guess many western nations lack it as well.
@@off_grid_javelin true our brothers had fighting spirit unlike those western and Russian
@@off_grid_javelin This is the western propoganda if the Russians could fight well in Syria then why couldn't they fight in Ukraine pls watch iearlgrey channels documentries he is a British media person living in donbass for 8 years he reports from ground truth is Russians aren't using suppressive bombing as they did in Syria beacuse there are civilians are everywhere Ukrainians aren't even allowing civilians to leave to save themselves from those brutal bombings and suppressive heavy firepower which will grind them to death pls watch two documentaries posted on above mentioned channel for clear view
There are only 2 videos of the actual tank to tank battle in this war available.
From those two videos it's hard to come to your conclusion
Indian should focus on upgrading t-72 and t-90 with Active protection system for tanks capable of protecting Indian tanks from top and direct attack mode from ATGM.
exactly , we can follow Turkish approach to this . They had their domestic Altay tank in planning but due to unavailability of powerpacks(engine) they used their existing leopard tank hulls and installed Altay turret's on top of them with other upgrades which is a good idea for India to adopt
I think that the T-90MS is supposed to have that system built in. And India had signed an agreement for a tank upgrade to the T90MS. So I assume that it come with the APS.
Correction:T90M has no other similarity to t14 armata except Thermal sights and battle management system
FCS is not much of different
So is armour,is completely different
Gun for now is same but one on t14 armata is modified,a new gun was planned to use but that gun never came to reality so t14 armata can't use latest Russian apfsds like vaccum 1,Vaccum 2 for now at least
There are 125mm calibre versions of same ammos but I don't know are they being produced or not
It was planned that in future T90MS would use
By reading the comments about T90 not a good tank, I thoughts there are too many fools who know nothing about tanks and war but try to show as if they have the best knowledge about tanks. How many of them have even seen a real tank ?? But still comment their shit knowledge about weapons !! 😂😂
First tell about yourself how much do you know before trolling others. It's a defence channel where defence related talks are conducted and everyone is free to share their thoughts. Here we don't discuss politics and don't tolerate trolls.
@@manas2656keyboard warrior! What do you do for living!
The one t90m that was destroyed was done by Russia itself using another t90m, there are analysis on this as One of the tank was hit by one RPG 7 and Carl gustaf simultaneously and was saved due to armour but some electronic issue triggered it to be requiring maintanence which Russian forces couldn't provide on ground so they hit the tank's weak point which they know by another t90m in between the turret and chasis at the autoloader to cookoff the whole tank but the appreciation is required as you will not see it exploding into pieces like others as seen in videos rather is burnout and all physical parts are intact leaving important electronics and software to get destroyed
I supose the drove the one to Aberdeen testing ground themselves as well?
American m1 abrams Afganistán or Syria k andar rpg or recoil less rifles use kar destroye kiye taliban or isis nay lekin American propogenda machines bhouat strong hai unhon nay media coverage ni honay di socho agar talibans k pass agtms or anti tank missiles hotay tou American tanks ka kiya haal hona tha American helicopter Afghanistan main kitnay he tabah huay 3 trillion dollars ka loss kar America Afghanistan say nikla 20 hazaar poorly equipped talibans k sath fight kartay huay russia say ziyaada losses America ko uthaanay paray agar ukrine ki tarha talibans ko saari dunia ki weaponry hasil hoti tou shyd aik bhi American tank wapis na jata na American fouji koi zinda or aj baat karta hai West Russia per
the only things we could do right now is start building next generations of tanks with aps and all the modern technology, just like aircrafts we should stop relying on russian tanks.
Your blind faith in Russian weapons is just mind boggling.
He's only a youtuber, probably haven't even seen a tank in real life.
There are ex Indian military officers who are analysing this war and giving reports to actual media channels, those analysis are far more reliable than his opinion.
@@svs4305 correct. But he sees Russian tech in his wet dreams every night xD
I agree. He definitely exaggerates Russia’s progress and equipment on this channel. When the war started, he had talked about how great Russia was doing in comparison to the US during the Iraq war. 8 months later and here we are. No update on it. Russian equipment is only good if you’re on a tight budget and need numbers over quality. If you want quality over quantity, you go for western equipment. This war is just showing these youtubers how important quality is over quantity. I like how they’ll quote stalin “quantity is a type of quality.” Ukraine has shown that’s bs.
Tanks provide fire support to advancing infantry and in a combined arms operation the infantry and armour coordinate their actions to destroy enemy holdouts. The infantry which accompanies the armour essentially kills the enemy anti tank teams and the armour provides fire support against machine gun nests, pillboxes and other static defences. Israelis learnt this in 1973 and immediately implemented the changes to their doctrine. Sadly Russian commanders are very resistant to change in tactics. They lack innovation.
We also need to understand that Russia still major defence supplier to India and Indian forces use maximum Russian weapons , western world weapons are expensive than Russian and since independence western world armed porkis more than us..that's reality so what we possess only that can be analysed more..that's fact nothing narratives😑
India should learn frm it.....nd make indigenous changes in Ind t90 based on terrain, challenges nd warfare tactics.
Arjun tank designers must learn absorb d design, tech nd innovative ideas frm t14, modern t90, Israeli, german tanks, incorporate it, 2 make it successful....... in todays tym u cant deliver dumb toy type designs continously without any responsibility nd expect nobody questions, judge, criticize it.
I think due to development in small lotring drone,small kamikaze lotring drone,4th generation ATGM can hit tank upto 8-10 kilometres range, advancement in man portable ATGM tank is just become a siting duck 🦆 today in modern welfare.
India could really make do of the eastern tanks like the Type 10 or even Type 90 from Japan or K2 from South Korea.
Hope you read this comment
Type 90 is way to costly bro, I hope we go the indigenous way with the Next generation tank program with DRDO and L&T.
Lol he want to use paper tiger against Battle hard t -90
Bro t-90 changed the history of syria and now kicking Ukrainian
@@winter15motivation44 yea coz they be fighting older Soviet tanks. They suck in terms of reverse speed and mobility compared to these eastern beasts
@@siddhanttambe4066 people just don't want to accept the fact that russian engineering sucks in modern warfare. whereas western or even east asian tanks are way more advanced than russian tanks. I personally love south korean K-2 black panther, although it is the most expensive tank in the world. but turkey got 100% ToT from SK and they made less expensive version of K-2 that is Altay. they used indigenous components to make it cheaper. I think India should also collaborate with SK to make cheaper K-2.
@Defence_Matrix Please make a video on Arjun Mk 1A
And a series on HF 24 Marut.
Anti drone technology honi chiye tanks mai
Good point, but FRCV and Arjun need upgrades and to be protected by mobile sams and a CIWS like what Kalyani is now making.
Yes.....remotely operated gun with small radar can be effective against Smaller drones.
@@TheGreatMarathaArmy Still think even after that that drone swarms can be handled only with a CIWS like what Kalyani makes combined with VL-SRSAM. Too many drones!!!
Its all about air dominance nowdays, we should be focusing on that
More about air support than Air dominance
It is impossible for any nation to achieve air superiority over sub continet skies
Bhaiya ye kidher se suna?
Justification of T 90 getting destroyed are reasonable but the fact is, everybody knows its a design which was not ment for 21st century warfare. Design was primarily ment for enabling easier production with out breaking the bank, designers gave emphasis on tank to tank battle and never gave much thought to crew protection or comfort, especially no blowout panel's or crew separation from ammo. There is a limit to every design which it can be enhanced or retrofitted, even the ERA blocks are one time use only. Also power is a limiting factor considering modern sensors and Active protection systems require a lot of power which old designs never needed. In ukraine both sides looses tanks daily, but russian doctrine or lack of any increases the damage to russian side. Surprisingly ukraine uses more combined arms maneuvers which makes better use of tanks.
Indian army has better logistics and combined arms tactics which provides lethality in battle field but the need of a new design is very important considering the rising No. of ATGMS, and drones. Battlefield is evolving much faster than in the past, so equipments has to be rapidly enhanced or fully replaced much faster. FMBT, FICV etc programs needs to be fast tracked.
What do you think about my views😅
Tanks are not designed for urban warfare instead they are meant to be used on large open areas.
Russian soilders in ukraine were poorly trained. I saw videos of them crashing tanks in trees.
Tanks need infantry to support them eslecially in close spaces like in cities which russian army did not provide.
Poor communication and coordination among russian army is also responsible for tanks losses.
@@Randomvideos-yr6cc Ya i also saw many, some end up straight on tree, some in water, its a mess they made out there. I agree with your opinion, all the current ones are designed for a open area tank to tank battle with infantry scouting ahead. But that doesn't mean its the end of tanks. Newer designs are coming, my most favorite so far is EMBT tank by rheinmetall & nexter.
Tanks provide fire support to advancing infantry and in a combined arms operation the infantry and armour coordinate their actions to destroy enemy holdouts. The infantry which accompanies the armour essentially kills the enemy anti tank teams and the armour provides fire support against machine gun nests, pillboxes and other static defences. Israelis learnt this in 1973 and immediately implemented the changes to their doctrine. Sadly Russian commanders are very resistant to change in tactics. They lack innovation.
The blowout panels weren't needed because the ammo was stored in all T70+ models is stored in an armoured carousel, kept inside the tank as low as possible to decrease chances of it being hit. Unfortunately, somebody in russia decided that it was a smart idea to store ammo outside of the carousel so as to increase the amount of shells available for use.. ignoring the reason that the ammo was stored in a carousel in the first place.
Hi India should buy a Russian t 14 armata tank and Russian Terminator tank and Russian light tank and Germany k 51 tank also and make in India should in deal
Maybe the tanks which Russia was using in Ukraine were older versions of T90 and Upgraded T72's
they're using T80 and its wariants (even the bvm), t90m and much more which are the same as indian tanks, btw the t90 is just a mix of t80 and t72
Bohat hi best tank hai
Because drdo can't make a good tank
Aao aao tumhare jaiso ka hi wait kr rha tha
@@nikhiltiwari7005 is he wrong??? Except nuclear missile what drdo have achieved with hundreds of billions going to it??? And cant even make basic subsonic nirbhay manik engine...!!! Public sector sucks
@@nikhiltiwari7005 did he say something wrong ? Can you prove him wrong ?
@@rudrakshsinghkatal5609 He can't but i can. it's more like a fault of our strategy. They never trusted in our psu and delayed in releasing funds. The bureaucracy, lobbying etc. Let's say if years ago we started making a tank even it was unsuccessful then imagjne how far we would have come.
In the Russia -ukraine war one serious lacunae was found in these Russian tanks especially in a top attack mode by anti -tank guided missiles like javelin, nlaw, etc that since the autoloader carousel is welded to the tank turret in the top attack mode the missiles directly hits this carousal where ammunition of the tank is stored thus setting of huge secondary explosions of the ammunition stored in the autoloader carousal sending the turret of the tank skyhigh, this is a serious lacunae since indian army has large number of Russian designed tanks, indian army must take urgent remedial and countermeasure and find ways and means to overcome this serious lacunae in these tanks or else it may prove costly for our armed forces.
Only way to overcome this is replacement of both T90 and T72. FRCV will replace T72, Arjun Mk3 with autoloader and 2 man turret like newest Panther KF51 can replace T90.
@@datoolz0 we have nearly 4500 t-90+ t-72 tanks replacing these tanks are not 1 or 2 days job, or even years it could be many decades which is a herculean task, so the army has to find solutions to these problems.
@@datoolz0 Big fat useless Arjun is dead There's no Arjun Mk2 or 3
@@sigma-sigma1 There is no way to fix this basic design defect. Any time a T72/90 tank is hit by an rpg, ATGM like javelin etc it blows up the entire turret. Entire crew is killed!
Pakistanis and everyone else on the world knows this. How will our tankers survive?
T72 is being replaced by FRCV. T90 is the problem. An Arjun Mk3 is T90 replacement,
with autoloader bustle style. It already has blowout panels, so will survive hits that kill T90 crew. Alternative is many deaths. Rossiya lost 1,000 tanks.
@@coolkal7590 Arjun is lightweight compared to all Western tanks. Arjun Mk2 was renamed
Arjun MK1A.
2010 and 2013, the Indian Army carried out comparative trials in the Thar Desert of Rajasthan, pitting the newly inducted Arjun MK1 against T-90 tanks, during which the Arjun showed better accuracy and mobility.
Arjunk Mk2 is needed to replace T90, which is proved unsafe with turret explosions that kill entire crew if hit by a rpg, or anti tank missile. Arjun crew will survive a hit under same circumstances.
The tank shown in this video is T90M. We don't have this variant. We have export variant of T90.
nice video matrix can you make a next video on arjun mbt what's the future of arjun mbt ?
There is no future with Arjun MBT. We have purchased 350 additional Arjun MBT and have closed the chapter
@Maggi Love its not the best tank. But it’s better than India’s T-72’s. It’s a decent replacement until something more advanced comes up. The Arjun doesn’t even have a blast proof door between the ammunition and crew. Very old thermal sights if any. No hunter killer capability, 1 sight between gunner and commander, and the turret literally has no armor. The mk1a is slightly better but still not good. It uses a rifled gun which has a shorter range and lower penetration power. Again, it’s still better than India’s t-72’s
What about reversing speed which is crucial for survivability?
I love T-90 tank.👍👍
India should upgrade its tanks capable of hard kill,soft kill,anti drone system, able to launch loitering ammunition against enemy tanks and advanced situational awareness.
Modern Kamikaze drone, loitering drone and modern guided artillery shell can target Tanks almost 50 km range make tanks like almost sitting duck 🦆.
Arjun should be upgraded with a bustle autoloader and an APS, plus Israeli system to detect gunfire and rpgs. This Arjun Mk3 should
be mass produced to replace T90 since FRCV program will replace T72. Arjun already comes with blowout panels, so if it takes the
same type of hits T90 is destroyed by Arjun will survive. Any tank can be destroyed by enough firepower, but survivability still matters!
With the rapid construction of railroads and roads, even heavy vehicles like Arjun can be transported to the Western border in large nos.
For replacing t 90 we need a light or medium weight category tank for operations in mountainuous area Arjun fails hear we need to buy t 14 or leopard 2 for this heavy weight tanks face difficulty in this type of terrane
@@borntoroar1212 Pura comment to par lete
We don't need autoloader Arjun both Mk 1 which I believe to be kinda better than Mk 1a due to composite Armor instead of ERA which are not as good as Composite also both Arjun MBT variants come with blast proof ammo storage bins with Blow Out Pannels which make a great crew safety and don't forget Arjun is based on Leopard 2A4
@@borntoroar1212 Arjun and leopard 2A4 are kinda like cousins because the Arjun mk 1 is very similar to Leopard 2A4 from turret layout to gunner optics positioning,also Arjun has Blow Out Pannels along with ammo storage bin which are similar to ammo storage compartment in Leopard II tank and also go to Wikipedia and you'll know how much Arjun Mk 1 is based on Leopard II tank
@@soumyajitsingha9614 ofcourse in its similar to leopard, india asked German scientist help in primary designing of Arjun
No, India doesn't Uses T90's most advance version..
The Proruve 3 or Upgraded T90MS is the most advance T90 in the world..
And India Uses T90S.
Which is Just 2000's technology.
We have heard of procurement of 464 T90MS, But it never happened.
What's about top protection against missile like Jarvelin. As per my knowledge using tank in today's battlefield is very tricky because without mobile air protection system and tank formation with proper mechanize support like repair, refule, reloading is not possible otherwise using tank is like white elephant make no sense.
Tanks provide fire support to advancing infantry and in a combined arms operation the infantry and armour coordinate their actions to destroy enemy holdouts. The infantry which accompanies the armour essentially kills the enemy anti tank teams and the armour provides fire support against machine gun nests, pillboxes and other static defences. Armour and infantry have a symbiotic relationship and if this relationship is not exploited to it's greatest potential then it would spell disaster for either of two. That's what happened with the russians. Their tanks moved without infantry support which made them easy target for enemy AtGM teams and their infantry moved without armour which made them easy targets for static defences
Indian T-90 bhishma par bhi 1 video banao bhaya
Well Turkish tanks like German Leopard were destroyed by Isis... and US Abrams mostly face old T72s in the middle east. But anyway, India too has old versions of T 90, which really needs to be upgraded.
T-80, T-90 etc. all are just upgraded baseline T-72 tanks. Russians are habituals to tell the world every upgraded weapon techs are new products and sell them as an overpriced items to the developing nations.
Su-27 < Su-30, S-300 < S-400 etc are examples.
@@devashisdas5024 thats true, even the 1st prototype of t90 was just a version of t72. Even Su 35 came from Su 30...
Armata looks a bit better tho. When India bought these in the early 2000s, they were okay for us. Not anymore.
@@devashisdas5024 isn't US selling 50 yr old machines like f16 and m1 abrams by constantly upgrading them
Jai hind🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
It was destroyed from an artillery fire... Which can destroy any tank
Pakistan's 🇵🇰 Al-khalid-1 tank is 2 tons lighter than Russian 🇷🇺 T-90 MS yet it's fire power is more, this is the list of ammunition carried by it;
1. 49 rounds of 125 mm auto cannon with 9 rounds per minutes rate of fire 🔥
2. 1500 rounds of 12.7 mm machine gun
3. 7100 rounds of 7.62 mm gun
4. 12 Smoke granates
5. 4 HE grenades
Al-Khalid uses the same autoloader used in t-72,90, the Chinese variant. Both have the same weakness. The turret will go flying if the ammunition is hit.
@@bonk9614 no it's autoloader is newer. Now in Al-khalid-1 variant China 🇨🇳 and Ukraine 🇺🇦 have redesigned everything
@@abdullahbutt2863 no one wants high amount of ammunition of apfsds in a medium tank as al Khalid khalid have weak armour and it,s become more easier to hit the ammunition storage which would completely destroy the tank
@@aliarham6209 armour is also very good but if we see Pakistan 🇵🇰 has 2 main types of tanks
1. VT-4 🇨🇳 (best in armoured protection)
2. Al-khalid-1 🇵🇰 (best in fire power and speed)
Their combination increases plus points of both tanks and covers the weakness hence very lethal combination is developed.
For semi mountainous and cold areas we've T-80 UD 🇺🇦 tank for complete mountainous area we've Al-Zarrar 🇵🇰 tank
@@abdullahbutt2863 for both al Khalid and al Khalid 1,armour is not good
The frontal armour thickness on turret is just 550mm
That's bad for modern warfare
3:30 why is Putin in the drivers seat?😂😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣
Oh boy
Probably going to blow up Zelensky
@@thenovicegamer007 💀
He is alrounder 🤣🤣
Make a video on Laclerc tank
It is being offered for indian FMBT
Source?
Information clear hai sir jai hind 🔥
Battle tactics, scenarios, person who operate nd enemy decide which tank is of what quality, possess what rank.....rest is just a speculation based on specs.......gud/bad, rank is just tokens to make urself happy.
Every country builds n operate d best possible weapons for their defence based on geography nd tactics......nobody can be perfect in every scenario.
True
Tanks provide fire support to advancing infantry and in a combined arms operation the infantry and armour coordinate their actions to destroy enemy holdouts. The infantry which accompanies the armour essentially kills the enemy anti tank teams and the armour provides fire support against machine gun nests, pillboxes and other static defences. Israelis learnt this in 1973 and immediately implemented the changes to their doctrine. Sadly Russian commanders are very resistant to change in tactics. They lack innovation.
Dikkt ye hai ki tanks ab bhot aasani se destroy ho jaate hai, warfare evolve kr gya hai, and air support ki baat ki jay to manpad k wjh se Sukhoi ki kamzori samne aa gai hai
Firepower is not "heavy" as being claimed, due to its smaller "chamber" and charge. Even more worrisome for India, is that current main round being used is still legacy 1980s vintage. Thus the asinine "requirement" for missile firing.
T90S can fire snivets round with modifications to the autoloader. But in the current config it can fire 3BM42 at best
T-72 and T-90 are good tanks for India 🇮🇳. Especially considering the terrains and climates of our borders. The west controls the narrative so obviously they'll provide completely one-sided footage and commentary. There are several reported cases of M1A2, Leopard 2, Merkava tanks being destroyed by significantly inferior weapons than the ATGMs being used by Ukraine.
M1A2, Leopard 2, Challenger 2 tanks are still way better than russian tanks in modern warfare. Russian engineering is not meant for 21st century warfare. We should make cheaper version of K-2 black panther tanks with ToT from south korea. K-2 is not as heavy as western ones, it weighs around 56 tons, it is designed to easily operate at any terrain. I think it's a very good option for India
@@Warship_Warriors oh really? I didn't see Leopard 2 perform any better than T-72 in this war. All those tanks (excluding Challenger 2) have been destroyed in conflicts by forces which weren't national militaries. No NATO tank has ever fought against a credible enemy yet and none has served on the same scale as T-72 and T-90. So obviously they have lesser casualties number compared to T-72 and T-90.
@@userx946 I agree. But the T72s and T90s were not designed for 21st century warfare. They lack many important capabilities.
@@Warship_Warriors yes but same applies to all other existing tanks. Against a decently equipped adversary no tank is safe. That's why Russia is working on T-14 and US is working on Abrams X and Germany is also working on a new tank. These tanks are being built keeping the threats that emerged in the 21st century.
@@Warship_Warriors which capabilities? The T72 and T90 were way ahead of it's time. They fit perfectly in the 21 century as a medium tank. There are no better tank in the world. And the T90 is the most produced tank of the 21 century exactly for that reason.
If the tank does not have CATV
Don't mean that I having hunter killer ability
t80 have hunter killer ability
Bahtreen
Humne toh Jeep mounted recoilless gun se shayad more than10 or 20 tank ko destroy kar diya tha like panzar tank in 1971
Recoilless gun uses APDS rounds or HEAT rounds. Against Pakistani Patten tanks they were like hot knife on butter..... **They were Patten tanks, not panzer**
@@nikhiltiwari7005 shayad likha hai doubt mein tha
Thanks for correcting me
Ammo protection is still an issue.
Only if it gets hit by incoming projectile.
@Maggi Love
ok defence exfart
@@AdityaSingh-vi6me you don't have to be an expert. Just look at Russian turrets flying up in Ukraine.
@@bonk9614
most foolish comment not a single tank provide turret protection from any attack only way to protect it is by Active Protection system which is also not 100% sucessful again ant tank guided missile .
even helicopter are not 100 % safe from attack of manpad .
also russia facing this problem due to no codination between airforce and army
@@AdityaSingh-vi6me lamo, you are ignoring the fact that western tanks including our Arjun has blow out panels which protects the crew from ammunition detonation. And why do western tanks need to be afraid of top attack missiles? Russia at the moment doesn't have any ATGM's that can perform top attack. Also western tanks especially Abrams have Ben proven in battles surviving Kornet hits at its front.
1st of all we have to understand bhartiya army has selected t90
Tank after through battle like trails ,even russians or any other make the systems of a tank after hard testing so the claim that this tank is not battleworthy is , a stupid argument, tank’s getting destroyed can be of many other reasons such as bad maintenance, bad tactics , manufacturing defects , or the main reason seen in russia ukraine war improper logistics supply in tank case logistics means fuel , ammunition, ration for tank crew etc
Modern Israeli 4th Generation ATGM like Spike which extend version can target Tank almost 8-9 km make perfect weapons for urban warfare and also next generation javelin can target 4-5 km make tank very vanurable target.
Can we have a vlog on where does our tanks like Arjun/ T90s stand in comparison to our neighbour's tanks?
Yes we want
He is not a vloger
T 90 is the best medium tank in the world. So it stands just fine. The main adversary for India is China, but China also has a T90 copy called ZTZ Type 99 tank. People argue whether the Chinese copy is better or not. But it could be on par with the T90 in theory, which means that it's just a question of who has more and who can operate them better.
Our India bought advanced version and also has its own power upgrades and we use it properly cuz we can provide air cover using Rafales
Video on kf51 panther vs t14 armata
were these tanks not kept in Russai after upgrad?
T-90 MS even better Afghanit can also be used for it
T-72,90 biggest weakness is it's reverse speed, many thanks in Russia got destroyed because they couldn't reverse back into cover.
War thunder?😏😃😃
@@nikhiltiwari7005 😳how do you know, btw reverse speed is also a problem irl.
@@bonk9614 i used to play but now my old laptop can't run it😔😔.
@@bonk9614 btw for reverse speed. I think in war thunder reverse speed is a factor to balance the game and make it a bit challenging. And I don't think in a real tank with a 1000hp engine there would be any problem reversing except not being able to see whats behind.
@@nikhiltiwari7005 T-90 has the same -5km/h reverse speed irl. There is a lot of footage where tanks both Ukranian and Russian struggle to reverse in real life combat. By this time I hope you have seen the battle between a Russian T-80 and Ukrainian T-64, here the t64 failed to retreat into cover because of its reverse speed. There are also many other footage which proves the importance of reverse speed.
www.google.com/search?q=ukraine+vs+russia+tank+battle&client=ms-android-telstra-au-rvc3&biw=412&bih=775&tbm=vid&sxsrf=ALiCzsasc-gky_6lYiBEpmZaFmE-TeMpnw%3A1668689927096&ei=BzB2Y5jFBYuJ4-EP1pelwAY&oq=russian+va+Ukraine+tank+&gs_lcp=ChBtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXZpZGVvEAEYAjIGCAAQHhANMggIABAIEB4QDTIICAAQCBAeEA0yBQgAEIYDMgUIABCGAzIHCCEQoAEQCjIHCCEQoAEQCjIHCCEQoAEQCjoECCMQJzoFCAAQogQ6CggAELEDEIMBEEM6BAgAEEM6BggAEAcQHjoFCAAQkQI6CwgAELEDEIMBEJECOggIABCxAxCRAjoICAAQBxAeEAo6DQgAEIAEELEDEIMBEAo6BwgAEIAEEAo6BwgAEIAEEA1QkA1YiWlguHVoAnAAeACAAesBiAGNK5IBBzAuMTcuMTKYAQCgAQGqARBtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXZpZGVvwAEB&sclient=mobile-gws-video#
Don't forget how slow T 90 is it's max speed is just 60kmph lol now days even a bicycle can achieve
Can these bicycles fire 120 mm apfsds? And weight 50 tonnes?
Tanks provide fire support to advancing infantry and in a combined arms operation the infantry and armour coordinate their actions to destroy enemy holdouts. The infantry which accompanies the armour essentially kills the enemy anti tank teams and the armour provides fire support against machine gun nests, pillboxes and other static defences. Israelis learnt this in 1973 and immediately implemented the changes to their doctrine. Sadly Russian commanders are very resistant to change in tactics. They lack innovation.
Soumyajit beta you should go and play warthunder
@@nikhiltiwari7005 that's not the point
T90 Max speed is 70 km/h
a vid dekha tha jaha me ak russian T72 tank 2 tank mine ko absorv krlia
Modern warfare has changed... Tank age is gone. Now is the time to develop Israel like strategic Armoured Combat vehicle, which is completely from a diffent world🔥
Tank = Unplanned Fatility
You are wrong friend. Those aroured vehicled are nothing against a tank
Tanks are not designed for urban warfare instead they are meant to be used on large open areas.
Russian soilders in ukraine were poorly trained. I saw videos of them crashing tanks in trees.
Tanks need infantry to support them eslecially in close spaces like in cities which russian army did not provide.
Poor communication and coordination among russian army is also responsible for tanks losses.
Dude, get out of your tiny world of war thunder
Tanks provide fire support to advancing infantry and in a combined arms operation the infantry and armour coordinate their actions to destroy enemy holdouts. The infantry which accompanies the armour essentially kills the enemy anti tank teams and the armour provides fire support against machine gun nests, pillboxes and other static defences. Israelis learnt this in 1973 and immediately implemented the changes to their doctrine. Sadly Russian commanders are very resistant to change in tactics. They lack innovation.
Arjun tank has beaten T90 in every aspect but not sure why but we went for this tin can.
T90 is way better than Arjun. Arjun has poor mobility and apart from APFSDS and HEAT rounds, the 120mm rifled gun is not long lasting and the fire power is poor.
Arjun is heavy on maintenance and costs twice as much as a t90. If breaks down very frequently
@@rudrakshsinghkatal5609 Where did you find that information from?
@@mr.mastermind4840 my dad was posted as GSO1 engrs at XII corps HQ . I visited the suratgarh workshop where 50% of the arjun fleet was lying inoperable. The guys over there told me that they haven't got spares due to disruption in supply chains
@@rudrakshsinghkatal5609 Not many numbers are ordered so spares related issue is actually understandable. DRDO cannot be blamed for this
Tank is not sent alone in war.infantry units via IFV,male drones clears off the path and than tank finally captures ground like a king
T 14 is now obsolete given Russia no longer receives French Thales thermal imagers and stuff and microprocessor also don't forget how T 14 just broke down in a parade it was so hilarious
Kya next generation wars me tanks ka role hi drons anty tank missile
Jo ladega wo dekhega jo lada nahi uska qua
Tanks didn't performed well for Russia as adequate infantry support was not provided.
Finally someone who understands the truth !!!!Tanks provide fire support to advancing infantry and in a combined arms operation the infantry and armour coordinate their actions to destroy enemy holdouts. The infantry which accompanies the armour essentially kills the enemy anti tank teams and the armour provides fire support against machine gun nests, pillboxes and other static defences. Israelis learnt this in 1973 and immediately implemented the changes to their doctrine. Sadly Russian commanders are very resistant to change in tactics. They lack innovation.
@@rudrakshsinghkatal5609 actually Soviets were proponents of combined arms operations, for some reasons Russians partially discarded that approach in Ukraine. Maybe they didn't had sufficient manpower and underestimated Ukrainians.
@@himanshugautam3405 the BTG approach to combined arms operation provide tactical operation flexibility but when it comes to operational flexibility they are handicapped by capacity. A BTG only has an infantry component of two infantry companies to provide cover to flanks of nearly 3 tank companies and the same contingent also fulfils anti infantry roles hence burdening them with additional work which could have done by other infantry companies and effectively over stretching them. BTGs are good for quick mobile operations but when it comes to consolidating their positions and holding their ground they are not very effective. Also the infantry component is sensitive to heavy casualties due to small size
India main tank
Is t 72 India has nearly 2000 tanks
India has upgraded t90 500 a decent number but India has most older tank that should be updated
Is ki fire power amrecan tank say kafi zayada hai
That t 90 m was destroyed by Russian themselves to prevent it from going into enemy hands why we don't know
T90 upgraded version is still the good tank.. we see from Ukraine war footage that two Ukrainian tanks run from the battlefield after seeing one Russian t90 approaching..
Btw how many t 90s does india currently has and are in order
IA operate about 2000 of those tanks
MiG 31 foxhound part 2?
Arjun ke bare m porki kya bolte h
Bahut heavy h madarsha gyan
1:52 is that a T-72? Russian T72B3 tanks do not use APS.
So is that a prototype or what? ??
Good
with trophy system
Iraqi T 90 goes booooom when M1 and M1A1 arrive knocking in desert storm and A 10 warthog goes Brrrrrrr
Fangirl
Are you alright ? Iraqis used T72 and T55 in desert storm, they never got the T90. Infact T90 wasn't operational till the late 90s . Desert storm happened in 1991
@@rudrakshsinghkatal5609 the Iraqis do operate t 90 since 2018
@@rudrakshsinghkatal5609 t 90 is just a fancy T 72 upgrade
Indian should learn from Israeli modern tank and upgrade in our T-90.
Many t 90 tank destroyed by ukraine anti tank missile
T 90 m varient ka bhi Indian army ne order deya hai na 550 tank ka. Wo yahi tank hai
Ye nahi.....wo T90 MS tank hai.
Paper tiger tank of Russia
Tank are useless just some ifvs with guided heat seek missiles can destroy them and drones can fire guided missile or suicide attack can be made.
👍
All russian tanks are an epic failure in Ukraine war .
I think india will need a better tactics and logistics on to use tanks where Russia failed
Everyone thinks that russian tanks are weak. Lets see.
Tanks are not designed for urban warfare instead they are meant to be used on large open areas.
Russian soilders in ukraine were poorly trained. I saw videos of them crashing tanks in trees.
Tanks need infantry to support them eslecially in close spaces like in cities which russian army did not provide.
Poor communication and coordination among russian army is also responsible for tanks losses.
Why Indian t90 is not adding active protection system
It's only a question of price. would you rather have 5 tanks without APS or 4 tanks with APS. Simple numbers you get more tanks without APS, and they perform exactly the same, except for when you would need an APS.
Russia has sent inferior tank in Ukraine without any advanced features. That's why they all failed against Javelin and NLAW ATGM
Which tank survives Javelin? 😐
@@godofthunder6561 one with a hardkill APS
They dont really have any “advanced tanks” to begin with
@@boejiden7093 T90M is a good tank and is fairly advanced
@@rudrakshsinghkatal5609 it still lacks 3rd generation thermal sensors, and the ammunition still lacks punch. The armor is not improved from previous versions. It uses the same base armor with a few additional items to improve protection like more modern ERA. I don’t think there’s a blast door on the M variant either. However, it is a relatively more advanced tank in Russia’s inventory which really isnt saying much.
Russian tanks with their auto loader ammo storage is a serious design flaw. It can cook the occupants towards a painful death. It is a misfortune that India has many such tanks 🙄
Western tanks also have them now.
Check the lastes abrams x of usa
@@Randomvideos-yr6cc Then it’s okay I guess. If someone else has similar problems we are good 👍
@@srikanth85in it is better friend. As it decreses the crew required for operating a tank.
@@Randomvideos-yr6cc the turret is crewless in the abrahamsX
@@srikanth85in no its not ok. Our turrets are crewed. AbrahamsX turret is crewless thats why they can afford to have autoloader. T-90 has crewed turret and no blast doors. Our soldiers will die inside the cheap garbage tanks if hit by an ATGM. Indian government’s corruption keeps leading to these terrible purchases and youtubers like DM perpetuate this fake propaganda that the T-90 is a good tank for our soldiers. T-90’s ERA is also few generations behind and most ATGM’s can penetrate the tank. No blast doors between the crew and ammunition means the turret is going to fly off the top of the tank like a missile. Hope to god that the crew can escape the tank before they also join the turret in its launch phase.
Second part of t -90s failure in Ukraine
India’s T-90 is not the most advanced version. It’s an older model. India has ordered T-90 MS so that should be a good stopgap measure. These T-90 tanks are not great in urban warfare. Their gun angle of elevation is much less than western tanks which is required to shoot at the enemy if they are hiding in buildings. Firepower of the T-90 is lacking as it cannot pierce a lot of armor. It’s a decent tank but its nowhere near the best. It’s the best option for India as it’s cost effective and has enough capability for India.
Era of tank coming to the end due to accurate smart long range weapons .
No
Lol, please dont make stupid claims if you don't have the relevant knowledge.
stupid conclusion. Tanks provide fire support to advancing infantry and in a combined arms operation the infantry and armour coordinate their actions to destroy enemy holdouts. The infantry which accompanies the armour essentially kills the enemy anti tank teams and the armour provides fire support against machine gun nests, pillboxes and other static defences
Nope. They are still prefer by Russian as well as western armies.
Chup karo please.
Tbh, India does not need to buy any Tanks now.....Tanks are starting to become obsolete now.....There needs to be a very powerful upgrade to the APS of entire Tank System against ATGMs and Manpads....So I think Instead of Wasting money over 3rd Gen Tanks/4th Gen Tanks we must pour that money into DRDO to Make such a tank Indigenously.....Also I don't think India needs huge number of Tanks Except our Western Borders..... Army Should Focus More on Artilleries, Attack and Kamikaze Drones, and Missiles which would be very useful in short range/mountain warfare....
Tanks provide fire support to advancing infantry and in a combined arms operation the infantry and armour coordinate their actions to destroy enemy holdouts. The infantry which accompanies the armour essentially kills the enemy anti tank teams and the armour provides fire support against machine gun nests, pillboxes and other static defences. Israelis learnt this in 1973 and immediately implemented the changes to their doctrine. Sadly Russian commanders are very resistant to change in tactics. They lack innovation.
@@rudrakshsinghkatal5609 Yes, That's Why I said Instead of Buying already made old tanks we should give money to DRDO to Research and make a Brand New Tank for the future....It would have a great Export Market as Well as very few nations are working on such a project....It will take 10-15 years but it would be worth it....and all we need uptil then is a few upgrades to the T-90s and they would be good enough to manage Pakistan(We and China won't be able to use tanks against each other due to Himalayas so we should invest a lot on Missiles, MBRLS, ATAGs, and Self Propelled Artillery so as to Counterbalance them) and any big assault can be filled by MANPADS, ATGMs, Mines, Missiles and AGMs....
@@Alinstien you don't understand the point. We need to focus on the tactics and logositcs aspect of operations rather than technological aspect. T90M is a very advanced tank but what's the use of having advanced tanks when you cant utilise them properly ?
@@Alinstien ever heard of light tanks? China has plenty of them in Himalayas
Thank isiliye pita kyuki Russians and chineses soldiers know reality of bureaucracy of their nation. They are forced to attack a nation but they inherently know... They are serving a psychopath Dictator. Their mindset made their tank prone to Manpads. Ukraine k pas true patriotism tha jo Russian tanks ko barbaad kar gaya... Jaise India k pas hai
Lol who uses manpads against tanks? Your mum???
Merkava tanks were also lost in numbers in Palestine wars
Don't mention it. Merkava was designed with different mentality.
Yes. Older Merkava tanks. Not the mk4’s which have the trophy APS.
Indian army ke pass SLR hogi Pak ke pass ak 47 to bhi Indian army aage rahegi karan sabko pata hain Indian army kya hain wasi ye baat hain ....
SLR 1C was superior to Ak in every aspect
T90 is comparable to M1, Challenger, panther tanks. They are very capable of defending and protective too. Just India buyed these tanks that's why we can't say these are the best tanks . Main reason India brought these tanks were budget.
The T Series Tin Cans have never been capable of taking on Western tanks. In Iraq over 3000 were destroyed at the cost of not a single American M1. Similar case in Arab - Israel conflicts. The T90 is no exception. In multiple engagements the Merkava has survived even the most intense conflict in Urban surroundings with modern ATGMs but the Russian tanks have been knocked out.
When Arjun was tested against the T72, the T72 had trouble penetrating its composite armor. Similar is the case with other T class tanks against Heavy western tanks. I think the flaw is more in the basic design and technology, and our love for "LIGHT" or "MEDIUM" tanks has taken us to a situation where our tank force has very poor tanks.
the BTG approach to combined arms operation provide tactical operation flexibility but when it comes to operational flexibility they are handicapped by capacity. A BTG only has an infantry component of two infantry companies to provide cover to flanks of nearly 3 tank companies and the same contingent also fulfils anti infantry roles hence burdening them with additional work which could have done by other infantry companies and effectively over stretching them. BTGs are good for quick mobile operations but when it comes to consolidating their positions and holding their ground they are not very effective. Also the infantry component is sensitive to heavy casualties due to small size
The T90 is an excellent tank especially the M version as well as the T72B3 and T80BVM. It's about proper utilisation of tanks that makes all the the difference.
And please don't compare the tanks used by iraqis to americans. You're extremely dumb to do that. the iraqi T72s were not the russian ones , those were yugosalav M84s with no night fighting capabilities and the best round they could fire was old 3BM22 with 300mm RHA penetration. Those M84s were more comparable to M60 pattons rather than challenger and abrams tanks fielded by NATO. How can you be so biased man !
Arjun is not in a good shape rn, my dad was GSO1 engrs at HQ XII corps, I visited the suratgarh workshop in feb 22 and was surprised to know that half of the arjun fleet was lying inoperable due to lack of spares. Arjun breaks down very frequently.
Our Tank force has decent or even excellent tanks by subcontinent standards. The Ajeya Mk2 upgrade of T72M fleet makes it comparable to chinese Type 96B. t90S already outclasses Type 96B and Type99 however it is inferior to type 99A
@@rudrakshsinghkatal5609 THis guy is probably a Russian troll. There are many of them on several boards. Nobody would call a 1960s era tank great except a Russian troll. Be careful of these paid agents who try to influence opinion in India
Wah wah wah.
Nice waja btai bhai ne.
Clapping.
Russians who have worlds biggest tank force.
Don't have vehicles to supply them fuel.
Second its range is 500 km / full tank.
Is video ma ap ne range mention nahi ki.
Q k fuel ka bahana jo lagana tha
First
👑
Becouse it is cheap trash.
Jo marzi bolo y tank failed huwa hai aur is sy be zyda bora haal hoga Indian tanks ka jab Indian tank larngy