They do put biases in their videos, in their video on the Battle of Bosworth Field they literally portray Richard III as a demon. But then there's nothing wrong with bias to tell a story if it is done intelligently.
I like Kings & Generals more as they even question the ancient sources biases more indepth whilst also having better graphics and in general more content.
Always felt Harold would’ve won had he not battled with the Vikings in the north and then marched all the way south to meet William’s forces. William had it easy.
It was probably a mix of that and William's patience. Looking through the details of the battle it's almost hard to believe that William took the engagement, but he bided his time and allowed the English to grow frustrated and impatient with constant charges and withdrawals. It was a gamble, the English lines easily could have held their discipline and probably won by standing still, but it paid off in the end.
it's like you've put all your art works into one master piece . There's something extraordinary about these feats throughout history i just can't explain sometimes but wow .
@@FlashPointHx Does this mean you will be starting on a project about the history of Normans? Tosney, Byzantine Empire, Tacred's sons, grandsons, great grandsons... Awesome.
If Harold, after the previous battle, had not marched quite so fast, and given his men time to recuperate, and not decided to rush off into his final battle but instead take the time to raise a larger army he probably survives and wins.
The problem Is that Harold technically usurped the Throne ,so he could had some enemy that see William as a lessen danger,as. well the fighting against Harald didn't did well for the strenght of Harold army..but he could had won this Battle if he was able to control his troops.. However,in a flat terrain his army was no Match for the heavy cavalry of William
@@alessandrogini5283 there are several ways to beat Calvary charges. The most simple was dig pits as the horses charge their legs with step into the pit and snap the horses leg, causing the horse to fall to the ground the rider to fly off and the Thrashing horse was an obstacle to the cavalry charge. Then there’s those spikes I forget what they’re called. There are two pieces of metal welded together with sharpened ends that are bent out so that when you drop them three of the points will be on the ground as a base and the fourth prong will be sticking straight up, so if the horse steps on it, it will cripple the horse. Thirdly, there’s the most famous probably of all the defenses, The pike. The big long pointy stick, and whether it’s driven into the ground is a more permanent, defensive line or just a long sharp pole held by soldiers. It is very effective, because no horse will run onto a wall of sharp pointy sticks. So if Harold find some more defensible area to stop that will not be so advantageous to Williams Calvary, and waits for his reinforcements, while letting his own men recover from the battle and forced march. It puts William in the position of either attacking Harold before all his reinforcements get to him, which means William hast to March thus sapping his troops of some of their strength, when they arrive to do battle, putting both sides on a more even keel in regards to exhaustion. Williams, fine Calvary is no longer a major player, so William is in trouble. William will have to attack Harold’s much more defendable location or sit and wait until Herald out numbers his men to where he can no longer have a chance at winning possibly meaning that William would have to leave England and be harassed all the way out. Let us not forget William was not exactly loved in Normandy. There have been people trying to usurp his power since he was just a child, and his father died, because he was technically an illegitimate child, which means he should not have been able to inherit Control of Normandy let alone England.
Oh can you imagine a big budget (historically accurate) telling of William I ‘the Conqueror’ in a movie trilogy 😍 such a fascinating man and his story.
The main issue is that you need time to tell the story of a man of this calibre's life. Second biggest issue is directors and funding not swaying the story to make it "for modern audiences" so william would end up a gay black trans man
He was King. And they were in the heartland of his supporters so he had to do something. But the Queen Mother (his mom) was trying very much to get her sons to stay and wait for more troops. Harald even asked his own younger brothers to stay in case he died but they told him no, we fight too.
Hadrada was in the north, let him raid England freely and he would lose the support of many nobles, hence why his forces were exhausted or fresh recruits.
Amazing video like usually, but I’m really looking forward for the next parts of Hannibal barca story looking forward to see new videos about it sooner ❤
One thing that never seems to be mentioned is Saxon archers and the Saxon warbow. Norman archers are mentioned,obviously. But nothing about Saxon archers
I love Hadrada’s life story, but I think Goodwinson surprise him with that force March from London. I mean he knew they were in the south coast waiting for Billy and in 7 days they were on his face. Big credit to Goodwinson for that, he tried to replicate it coming down south and even managed to get a good defensive position, however he should have bid his time and regroup better and maybe replenish his housecarls. You cannot win HH and Billy the Conqueror b2b without rest. Anyways, just making my point that Goodwinson is a little bit underrated for all he achieved tho.
Harold could won if he control more the troops,but in a flat terrain and not Mountains,his army was Simply too light to defeat the heavy cavalry of William..instead,he should' had ally with harald against William
he must have give nurthumbria to his brother and made peace with hadrada he lost his fouces from william and we must agree godwin wa not goood commonder @@alessandrogini5283
@@Inkognito-ts4to Hadrada was also a renowned commander. Godwinson managing to win at stamford bridge should be considered a marvellous victory in it’s own right.
@@jamesson1154 Ah yeah. Maybe Instead of “Marvellous”, i should’ve said it was simply a significant victory and a shock since many would expect Hadrada to win over Godwinsson who was comparatively inexperienced as a commander. I think had Harald’s forces been prepared and in their positions, it could’ve ended the other way.
Better late than never: A Huge (even a "Yuge") thanks for making the series! Many of us peons forget what, as Paul Harvey put it, the Rest Of The Story as to do with the main event.
Thank you for creating these long videos. Much appreciation from a fan of you from Sri Lanka. William the conqueror born as a illegitimate child of Robert of Normandy. After securing his rule in Normandy after lengthy battles he focused on war ravaged and fractured England. One of the greatest conquerors in history. Brilliant documentary. Thanks History Marche for creating this documentary🔥🔥🔥🔥 a son of France ♥️🔥 .my fav country in Europe 🌍 Vive la France. 🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵 . I ve also read a comic book which is set in this period. one of the best comics I ever read.
Hardly a son of France. He had twice defeated the French in battle at Mortemer (1054) and Varaville (1057) which would embolden him to move on securing what he saw as his rightful place at the head of the Kingdom of England.
I do have to give William his respect for being so young and having to come of age fighting his way through betrayal and he did become a great warrior leader and King 👑❤️💯💪
Too bad much like Qin Shi Huang's successors in the Qin Dynasty of China, William's own successors didnt amount to much and the Dynasty died out after a few short successors or within a hundred years or so. Why is it always like that that great leaders are almost never succeeded by good rulers? Most are piss poor rulers. History....tends to repeat itself regardless where you go in the world.
The Normans of France were 95% French.. 10-15,000 Scandinavian people were mixed with 200-300,000 natives.. they were mixed for 2 centuries.. there was no longer any taste of Viking blood,2/3 of William's army came from all over France. Scandinavian Normandy is a myth invented by the English
HistoryMarche, there are more videos that can combine into one video such as: Renaissance (4 Parts) Attack on Moscow ⚔ Napoleon's Strategy in Russia, 1812 (2 Parts) ⚔ DOCUMENTARY First Battle of Tarain, 1191 AD ⚔ The First Islamic Conquest of India and Second Battle of Tarain, 1192 AD ⚔ Muhammad of Ghor Returns.
family back in the day fought at hastings they were thanes..after the battle there lands were taken off them..and the refugees ..most went to to welch marshes and area to live after the battle.. I traced them back further to 996 AD west saxons.. its not in the history books as to what happened after the battle but thats where they went ( wonder if they used boats to cross the bristal channel into wales ) looks like history repeats itself though not as wide as the english channel today ..
The idea of Harold being hit by an arrow of friendly fire doesn't seem too far fetched after all. Although why,I couldn't guess. But, if you think about it, why would the Norman archers fire their arrows into the air while their own troops were intermixed with the English? Does anyone have some input on that?
Maybe it was a lone archer who seized an opportunity to kill the leader of an opposing army. How Harold died is a legend after all so the details will always be unclear.
(History Marche) channel proven its excellence working in previous videos and such as this amazing ,informative & long documentary about skilled William conquerors to ward's deep France 🇫🇷 launched from Normandie & after that launched his invention assaults to ward's England 1066 AD ..😲..what was remarkable he used several political methods besides his men swords powers & struggled his foes successfully...it was magnificent documentary coverage..allot thanks
The talk of "unlicensed" cables towards the start of this video has me interested. How exactly did this "licencing" of castles work? Who had the authority (I imagine centrally it would have been the king but it also could have a system for devolution im not sure). If anyone can point me in the right direction to do some research that would be much appreciated
Its like you think it is. It is the same with cities allowed to having walls and such, that practice is as old as time itself and was granted by rulers especially if they had a foreign ruler. Its inverse is also time tested: city walls were often broken down or gaps were created when you were conquered to prevent the region from becoming too strong of an opposing force. While effective in subdueing, it leaves a region unprotected so it was often accompanied with granting rights to other (often minorities/counter balancing) powers in the region. However the best strategy is to have a stable political alliance, because then you could have both, and that is exactly what people found in William and thus flocked to his will.
Proud direct descendant to Willam the Conquer🇫🇷🏴 My Grandfather was a proud Anglo Norman. He knew French as well as English sometimes better, and I remember him and my two great aunts would speak to each other in fluent French over English sometimes. I miss them
More like Aegon in regards to English history leading up towards the War of the Roses. Daenerys was supposed to be like Henry VII, who successfully reconquer his rightful throne after the Civil War
My family, the Raymond family came across with the Army. Our family seat was just 20 miles east of Norman’s bay at Rye Castle. Raymond (middle and modern English), Reginmund (Old Germanic) or Raimund (old French) is a Germanic name so it’s hard to tell if the name came from the Norse, Danes or the Franks originally.
nice I had two grandfathers at the Battle of Hastings, one Norman and one Anglo-Saxon but both were nobles in the area of Kent. The Anglo-Saxon was the nobleman before the battle (he died in the battle) while the Norman grandfather took his place when William installed his own vassals and two generations later their grandchildren married tying the two families together. the Anglo-Saxon grandfather was named Ethelwolf which means Noble Wolf and is my online persona in medieval games. The Norman was named something far too Frenchy for me to remember or pronounce lol
@@ImpeachObamaASAP2010how in the world would you be able to know all this? This was almost a thousand years ago,its quite hard to believe that this could have been research for (forgive me for this) a family, even if they were small nobles.😮
The Norman invasion of England in 1066 changed English Anglo Saxon culture permanently and dramatically. Although ancient Latin was still the preeminent language of choice among scholars, religious texts and official manuscripts, William imposed French in conquered England forcefully and without restraint. He created a dynastic family in England that lasted centuries which included other French elites that eventually ruled over England (i.e., the Plantagenets from Maine-Anjou region of France). Spoken and written French supplanted angle-Saxon language in the new Norman language. The end result is today’s modern English: a mix of Greek/Latin origin (60%) and remaining angle-Saxon (about 30-40%). The Normans and other French rulers of England did that.
Who are these French elites and French rulers? According to period sources Anglo-Normans fought hard and well to keep the French out of England...William Longschamps being a perfect example of what happens when a Frenchie thinks he can lord it over the English.
great work though William was not a "great king of England". His reign was basically about crushing every saxon resistance & massacre the local population. After the conquest, he spent most of his time in Normandy where he died in 1087.
"And Ardant du Picq points out that in all his years of conquest, Alexander the Great lost only seven hundred men to the sword. His enemy lost many, many more, but almost all of this occurred after the battle (which appears to have been an almost bloodless pushing match), when the enemy soldiers had turned their backs and begun to run. Carl von Clausewitz makes the same point when he notes that the vast majority of combat losses historically occurred in the pursuit after one side or the other had won the battle. (Why this occurs is a subject that will be looked at in detail in the section "Killing and Physical Distance.")" [Lt. Col. Dave Grossman, On Killing, Revised Edition, 2009]
William and his ancestors were not called "dukes of Normandy " they were counts of Rouen ( at least that's how they styled themselves) . there was a title leader of the pirates ( dux pyratorum in Latin ) was used in earlier times but the actual duke of Normandy title became official during the plantagenet times 11(1144-1204) angevin period. In conclusion this title is not what the counts of Rouen called themselves or at least officially recognized.
William and his ancestors were called duke. The bayeux tapstry call william duke. Only one ancestor called himself count of rouen and supposedly no official documents of any norman rulers use that title. Most of the norman rulers called themselves count of normandy. Duke wasn't even commonly used until after 1000.
@@mattgambill5543 you are truly misinformed. The title duke ( or dux Roman) was used since Roman times , even by regions close to Normandy or neighboring countries before the year 1000 unlike your false claim that it wasn't used before 1000 example.... Nominoe duke of Brittany (800-851) so he was duke 150 years before the year 1000 . Ranulf duke of Aquitaine ( 820-866) Reginar longneck duke of Lorraine 850-915 Tassilo 1 duke of Bavaria 560 - 610 , 400 years before the year 1000 . The title duke of Venice or doge was established in 697 . Plz stop your juvenile misinformation. Plus what we call someone today in modern times is different to what they were known officially in their own times . Today ppl refer to Alfred the great as king of England, when in reality his official title was king of the Anglo-Saxons . His grandson became king of the english ( not king of England) , it was a few kings later that the term king of England began to circulate. Same with Normandy, you can't have a duke of a region since the title derived from the normans who invaded it . The adoption came later on . The title count of Rouen ( named after a town that had been there for centuries) was probably more prestigious than being duke of a group of normans or pirates . That's why it was used .
@ageofechochambers9469 The only thing juvenile is failing to see that i was referring to the normans specifically in their titles. The bayeux tapestry calls william duke. The bay eux tapestry was woven in william's lifetime. William being or calling himself duke was not anachronistic given. As for count of rouen, william the first, son of rollo, was the only one to to use the title count of rouen. I do agree that titles did get assigned anachronistically but not in william the conqueror's case or william I with count of rouen. My source being the royal geneaologies of europe organization.
@@mattgambill5543 the bayeux tapestry is a propaganda piece , william could have referred to himself as king of the world it doesn't make it fact . It's basically all the events based on how Norman's wanted the narrative to be , it wasn't facts that were agreed Upon by all parties at the time ( church , normans, and the english) . Did the bayeux tapestry mention that william is a bastard like he was referred to at his birth ? Did the bayeux tapestry mentioned how william was not supposed to inherit normandy because if his illegitimate birth ? NO , because it was supposed to legitimize all of williams claims while staying silent on all the disputed facts . FYI in the norman tapestry Harold ( who william killed at hastings) was referred to as dux ( duke ) before the invasion does that make him a duke ? There wasn't 1 dukedom or duchy in England at the time . He was an earl and duke and earl were not the same title , proof of that is when williams followers were given titles they were given earldoms and not dukedoms acknowledging that they are different ranks . So if the bayeux tapestry was accurate as far as titles go they wouldn't call Harold a dux ( or duke ) before the invasion. Plus Harold is referred to later on by the tapestry as Rex ( king ) does this means the normans recognized him as king of England ? No they didn't they invaded because they saw him as a usurper ( a false pretender ) . But they called him by either how he viewed himself or as the english saw him . As far as the normans were concerned he wasn't a king that's why they invaded. History is written by the winners so after the normans won they confirmed what they liked and excluded other things that wasn't desirable in that tapestry . FYI in an academic discussion claims must be backed by evidence/facts and questions from the opposing side must be addressed. Until now you have not responded to your claim that the title "duke" didn't come into usage until the year 1000 which I proved your mistaken ( no humility or correction from your side ) . Plus if the title duke didn't come into usage until 1000 this means according to your claim that the following ppl from williams ancestors weren't dukes ... 1) Rollo not duke since he died in 928 2) William longsword wasn't duke since he died in 942 3)Richard 1 wasn't duke because he died in 996 So your contradicting yourself because by that claim it proves my point that at least the first 3 rulers of normandy weren't dukes but counts of Rouen. Which is fact . You are not credible ppl in this historical field will read this and know your error , and it happened because you went to Wikipedia read it and thought it's correct ( I researched it and found out is wasn't) . If you mentioned credible facts I'll respond if you type nonsense I'll ignore you, it's RUclips I can answer serious questions I can't sit here hours giving you a history lesson especially if you argue to argue.
23:12 in 1882 Arques was renamed Arques-la-bataille to avoid confusion with an homonym town in Picardy. It’s strange to watch your superb video while knowing a lot of the places mentionned 😉
Hey Buddy can you start making a series on How Marathas defeated mughals in India. There were many battles which happened and a lot of guerilla tacticts which were used by Marathas to defeat mughals. This IMO is Indian Game of Thrones and would take 1 whole series where you can cover different battles such as Battle of Pratapgard, Battle of Pawankind etc. I think you can attract a lot of Indian Audiences from this. Thanks!
“Hinduism and its gods,” says Sir Alfred Lyall: “are a troubled sea, without shore or visible horizon, driven to and fro by the winds of boundless credulity and grotesque invention. A tangled jungle of disorderly superstitions, ghosts and demons, demi-gods and deified saints, household gods, tribe gods, local gods, universal gods, with their countless shrines and temples, and din of their discordant rites, deities who abhor a fly’s death, those who delight still in human victims, and those who would not either sacrifice or make offerings, such religious chaos.” [Asiatic Studies, Vol 1, pp 2, 3]
Going from "the Bastard" to "the Conqueror" is a pretty good way to never be questioned again so long as you live.
Still a bastard🙂
This is probably the least biased channel that makes this type of content. I feel like its pure education and no propaganda. Great content
Dont forget there's two sides to a story
They do put biases in their videos, in their video on the Battle of Bosworth Field they literally portray Richard III as a demon. But then there's nothing wrong with bias to tell a story if it is done intelligently.
I like Kings & Generals more as they even question the ancient sources biases more indepth whilst also having better graphics and in general more content.
William was skilled and determined.
But he also got very lucky on multiple occasions.
As most succesful conquers through history, life is usually 99% effort and 1% luck, and to get a large place on history that 1% is quite important
In my experience there is no such thing as luck.
@@daguroswaldson257 nonsense percentages are a fact of life
@@daguroswaldson257 Then you dont have enough experience
it takes skill to capitalize on luck
“I died-Yours truly, Robert” Now that’s a guy who doesn’t beat around the bush
Legends says that Harold's huscarls, having watching their king's demise, close ranks and fought to the last
Always felt Harold would’ve won had he not battled with the Vikings in the north and then marched all the way south to meet William’s forces. William had it easy.
It was probably a mix of that and William's patience. Looking through the details of the battle it's almost hard to believe that William took the engagement, but he bided his time and allowed the English to grow frustrated and impatient with constant charges and withdrawals. It was a gamble, the English lines easily could have held their discipline and probably won by standing still, but it paid off in the end.
If the fyrd had not broken their own formation and shield wall at Hastings, Harold would certainly have prevailed.
😛 Coming from Normandy, England is mine now ahahah
@@93200Jonas and luckily for you, had it not been for the English, we Germans would have conquered you 1914 ;)
@@Falkenhayn.Hamburg20 you mean canada
I bow to the story telling ability of yours guys, simply amazing to watch. I can sit here all day and it would still feel amazing.
rectangles and squares have never been so exciting
Little fact- 7:38 The town of Isigny is the origin of the name "Disney". An ancestor of Walt must certainly have been a "Seigneur D'Isigny".
There was a Disney in the battle.
and mickey mouse was their banner
@@HikerBikerMoter Yeah the Death Star with Mickey's ears ^^
Sir Disney a knight in shining armor charges the enemy in battle M-I-C-K-E-Y M-O-U-S-E
@Booz2010The Family probably moved in Ireland after.
Thank you for putting these together! William was one tough Bastard!!!!
it's like you've put all your art works into one master piece . There's something extraordinary about these feats throughout history i just can't explain sometimes but wow .
Well put together! Need to review this a few times - hoping to hit up Normandy later this year - Love the detail in your maps
🔥 FPH
@FlashPointHx your content is amazing
love your stuff bro, got me into being more interested in history a couple years ago
@@JuTakii that is awesome to hear!
@@FlashPointHx Does this mean you will be starting on a project about the history of Normans? Tosney, Byzantine Empire, Tacred's sons, grandsons, great grandsons...
Awesome.
If Harold, after the previous battle, had not marched quite so fast, and given his men time to recuperate, and not decided to rush off into his final battle but instead take the time to raise a larger army he probably survives and wins.
The problem Is that Harold technically usurped the Throne ,so he could had some enemy that see William as a lessen danger,as. well the fighting against Harald didn't did well for the strenght of Harold army..but he could had won this Battle if he was able to control his troops.. However,in a flat terrain his army was no Match for the heavy cavalry of William
@@alessandrogini5283 there are several ways to beat Calvary charges. The most simple was dig pits as the horses charge their legs with step into the pit and snap the horses leg, causing the horse to fall to the ground the rider to fly off and the Thrashing horse was an obstacle to the cavalry charge. Then there’s those spikes I forget what they’re called. There are two pieces of metal welded together with sharpened ends that are bent out so that when you drop them three of the points will be on the ground as a base and the fourth prong will be sticking straight up, so if the horse steps on it, it will cripple the horse. Thirdly, there’s the most famous probably of all the defenses, The pike. The big long pointy stick, and whether it’s driven into the ground is a more permanent, defensive line or just a long sharp pole held by soldiers. It is very effective, because no horse will run onto a wall of sharp pointy sticks. So if Harold find some more defensible area to stop that will not be so advantageous to Williams Calvary, and waits for his reinforcements, while letting his own men recover from the battle and forced march. It puts William in the position of either attacking Harold before all his reinforcements get to him, which means William hast to March thus sapping his troops of some of their strength, when they arrive to do battle, putting both sides on a more even keel in regards to exhaustion. Williams, fine Calvary is no longer a major player, so William is in trouble. William will have to attack Harold’s much more defendable location or sit and wait until Herald out numbers his men to where he can no longer have a chance at winning possibly meaning that William would have to leave England and be harassed all the way out. Let us not forget William was not exactly loved in Normandy. There have been people trying to usurp his power since he was just a child, and his father died, because he was technically an illegitimate child, which means he should not have been able to inherit Control of Normandy let alone England.
That whole series together was great.
Oh can you imagine a big budget (historically accurate) telling of William I ‘the Conqueror’ in a movie trilogy 😍 such a fascinating man and his story.
Most likely be a good tv series much like how Vikings was done up or HBO's Rome.
A trilogy wouldn't be enough IMHO, a serie would be better. William the Conqueror completely changed the destiny of what will be France and England.
They'd make him black with braids. "William the Conqueror was black!!!"
The main issue is that you need time to tell the story of a man of this calibre's life. Second biggest issue is directors and funding not swaying the story to make it "for modern audiences" so william would end up a gay black trans man
Kings and conqueror is releasing soon. Look it up. Super hyped for it hope its good.
It will be a tv show btw not a movie.
Great job! I reall enjoy David's narration he is cool to listen to and not monotone .
He could get with Kings and Generals narrator for a video or two. Both make similar styling videos.
Harold so unlucky, damn. Why he just didn't wait in London and fortify? He just entered the battle with fresh peasants and some man at arms...
He was King. And they were in the heartland of his supporters so he had to do something. But the Queen Mother (his mom) was trying very much to get her sons to stay and wait for more troops. Harald even asked his own younger brothers to stay in case he died but they told him no, we fight too.
His mother urged him to take immediate action. He followed her advice or admonition.
Hadrada was in the north, let him raid England freely and he would lose the support of many nobles, hence why his forces were exhausted or fresh recruits.
Wasn't his style. His idea of campaigns were speedy marches, as evidenced by his earlier actions versus the Welsh.
He wanted to take William by surprise, like he did the Vikings at Stamford Bridge. Good scouting by the Norman's foiled that plan tho.
Thanks
Thank you so much for the support. Very kind of you!
Thank you again, HistoryMarche!
So nice to see these battles put together. One or 2 I had never even heard of.
Amazing video like usually, but I’m really looking forward for the next parts of Hannibal barca story looking forward to see new videos about it sooner ❤
Yes the Hannibal series has been my favourite, i may rewatch it from the start
yea i've been waiting for them to finish that one for a while
I second that
it’s a looong story but yes we want it
37:39 - incweasing :)
One thing that never seems to be mentioned is Saxon archers and the Saxon warbow. Norman archers are mentioned,obviously. But nothing about Saxon archers
Maybe they weren't present?
This is such a epically brilliant video. The long form allows for real insights into medieval politics
Wow this is extremely well done. Definitely will be watching more of this channel
Thanks fpr for your hard work HM! Love the series
16:10 so did people actually feel anything for one another in these cases, or is it entirely practical in design?
Amazeballs. History En Marche is truly a gift to the aspiring war lord. 🤣
I love Hadrada’s life story, but I think Goodwinson surprise him with that force March from London. I mean he knew they were in the south coast waiting for Billy and in 7 days they were on his face. Big credit to Goodwinson for that, he tried to replicate it coming down south and even managed to get a good defensive position, however he should have bid his time and regroup better and maybe replenish his housecarls. You cannot win HH and Billy the Conqueror b2b without rest. Anyways, just making my point that Goodwinson is a little bit underrated for all he achieved tho.
Harold could won if he control more the troops,but in a flat terrain and not Mountains,his army was Simply too light to defeat the heavy cavalry of William..instead,he should' had ally with harald against William
he must have give nurthumbria to his brother and made peace with hadrada he lost his fouces from william and we must agree godwin wa not goood commonder @@alessandrogini5283
King William I the Conqueror was a direct male line descendant of Antiochus II Theos. 👑💍🇬🇧
This is the greatest video of this event I've ever seen! Very very cool. Kudos to you dude!
Who would win in a battle Harold hardrada and his Viking Army vs William the Conqueror and his Norman Army
hadrada his army was a better version of the Anglo Saxon army at Hastings and the Anglo Saxons almost won
@@Inkognito-ts4to Hadrada was also a renowned commander. Godwinson managing to win at stamford bridge should be considered a marvellous victory in it’s own right.
@@ecaeas4439 not really, most of Haralds men were unarmored but they still went into battle. Godwinson literally caught them with their pants down.
@@ecaeas4439 harald lost only because he couldn't gather all his forces quick enough since he was disembarking still
@@jamesson1154 Ah yeah. Maybe Instead of “Marvellous”, i should’ve said it was simply a significant victory and a shock since many would expect Hadrada to win over Godwinsson who was comparatively inexperienced as a commander. I think had Harald’s forces been prepared and in their positions, it could’ve ended the other way.
Better late than never: A Huge (even a "Yuge") thanks for making the series! Many of us peons forget what, as Paul Harvey put it, the Rest Of The Story as to do with the main event.
I yugely approve you use of yuge.
@@ImpeachObamaASAP2010 Slow Clap! 🤙🤙🤙
very informative and well narrated. many thanks and godspeed!
Another awesome video thanks!
Thank you for creating these long videos. Much appreciation from a fan of you from Sri Lanka. William the conqueror born as a illegitimate child of Robert of Normandy. After securing his rule in Normandy after lengthy battles he focused on war ravaged and fractured England. One of the greatest conquerors in history. Brilliant documentary. Thanks History Marche for creating this documentary🔥🔥🔥🔥 a son of France ♥️🔥 .my fav country in Europe 🌍 Vive la France. 🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵 . I ve also read a comic book which is set in this period. one of the best comics I ever read.
Hardly a son of France.
He had twice defeated the French in battle at Mortemer (1054) and Varaville (1057) which would embolden him to move on securing what he saw as his rightful place at the head of the Kingdom of England.
@@doug6500 yes so I think we should consider him as a norman and a Englishman.
Victory for Norman France!
My last name is a testament of Norman English supremacy
The Duchy of Normandy was part of France. He should paid tribute to the French King every year. He was French, French dad is language.
Very good. Thanks for putting this together
I do have to give William his respect for being so young and having to come of age fighting his way through betrayal and he did become a great warrior leader and King 👑❤️💯💪
Too bad much like Qin Shi Huang's successors in the Qin Dynasty of China, William's own successors didnt amount to much and the Dynasty died out after a few short successors or within a hundred years or so. Why is it always like that that great leaders are almost never succeeded by good rulers? Most are piss poor rulers. History....tends to repeat itself regardless where you go in the world.
Vikings from France and Norway competing each other for crown of England
The Normans of France were 95% French.. 10-15,000 Scandinavian people were mixed with 200-300,000 natives.. they were mixed for 2 centuries.. there was no longer any taste of Viking blood,2/3 of William's army came from all over France. Scandinavian Normandy is a myth invented by the English
Amazing content as always!
HistoryMarche, there are more videos that can combine into one video such as:
Renaissance (4 Parts)
Attack on Moscow ⚔ Napoleon's Strategy in Russia, 1812 (2 Parts) ⚔ DOCUMENTARY
First Battle of Tarain, 1191 AD ⚔ The First Islamic Conquest of India and Second Battle of Tarain, 1192 AD ⚔ Muhammad of Ghor Returns.
8:58 what happened to the king invading his land earlier
World class animation and sounds ♥️🙏 thank you
family back in the day fought at hastings they were thanes..after the battle there lands were taken off them..and the refugees ..most went to to welch marshes and area to live after the battle..
I traced them back further to 996 AD west saxons..
its not in the history books as to what happened after the battle but thats where they went ( wonder if they used boats to cross the bristal channel into wales ) looks like history repeats itself
though not as wide as the english channel today ..
Great narration, Awesome animation.
Very good job indeed! Bravo! Music, video, plus information! A++
The idea of Harold being hit by an arrow of friendly fire doesn't seem too far fetched after all. Although why,I couldn't guess. But, if you think about it, why would the Norman archers fire their arrows into the air while their own troops were intermixed with the English? Does anyone have some input on that?
Maybe it was a lone archer who seized an opportunity to kill the leader of an opposing army. How Harold died is a legend after all so the details will always be unclear.
50:00 That skull with the tongue out was funny as hell
50:00 The king pointed at the killer, but they all acted like he pointed at next king lol
the talk bubbles are hilarious. @47:24 " Normans Suck!" xD
3:40 SHEEESH
He must've done something HEINOUS to be attacked like that at a wedding feast.
(History Marche) channel proven its excellence working in previous videos and such as this amazing ,informative & long documentary about skilled William conquerors to ward's deep France 🇫🇷 launched from Normandie & after that launched his invention assaults to ward's England 1066 AD ..😲..what was remarkable he used several political methods besides his men swords powers & struggled his foes successfully...it was magnificent documentary coverage..allot thanks
The talk of "unlicensed" cables towards the start of this video has me interested. How exactly did this "licencing" of castles work? Who had the authority (I imagine centrally it would have been the king but it also could have a system for devolution im not sure). If anyone can point me in the right direction to do some research that would be much appreciated
Its like you think it is. It is the same with cities allowed to having walls and such, that practice is as old as time itself and was granted by rulers especially if they had a foreign ruler. Its inverse is also time tested: city walls were often broken down or gaps were created when you were conquered to prevent the region from becoming too strong of an opposing force.
While effective in subdueing, it leaves a region unprotected so it was often accompanied with granting rights to other (often minorities/counter balancing) powers in the region. However the best strategy is to have a stable political alliance, because then you could have both, and that is exactly what people found in William and thus flocked to his will.
*"You're not that Guy pal"* - William
3:19 Oi! You gotta loisense fo' that cahsol mate?
Love your content!!!!
13:22 did they have food stocks that lasted that long, or were deals made?
Proud direct descendant to Willam the Conquer🇫🇷🏴
My Grandfather was a proud Anglo Norman. He knew French as well as English sometimes better, and I remember him and my two great aunts would speak to each other in fluent French over English sometimes. I miss them
Look at how small Normandy is.... Just blows my mind. How do you mess around and decide and make england your's.
This is my favorite war history channel.
Great job, thank you for sharing your excellence.
This program is awesome. I love the production and narration. I have no idea how I haven’t seen this page before.
Did I read that right? Emma of Normandy was 104 when she died? That's an amazingly long life for that time 😳
No she died at the age of 68. Guess it was a typo by them.
Excellent video!
THanks, I was thinking about this the other day
Real life game of thrones. Awesome episode, great channel !!
Eagerly awaiting the next hannibal upload.
This is awesome. HBO needs the rights to this
I was wondering what happened to Hannibal series. Did you guys abandoned it or are you going to finish it some day?
I'll be finishing part 19 soon.
@@HistoryMarche oh that's awesome. Thank you very much guys, I love your videos, really ❤️❤️❤️
good, very good video...congrats
Great stuff, thanks
Great production as always.
Whats the name of the epic song at 18:09?
He is like Robert Baratheon in France and Aegon conquer in England.
More like Aegon in regards to English history leading up towards the War of the Roses. Daenerys was supposed to be like Henry VII, who successfully reconquer his rightful throne after the Civil War
YESS I WANTED THIS, THANK YOUU
Awesome video love it
This channel is soooooo DAMN GOOD
Thank you! Loved this series! William the Conqueror is one of history's greatest kings!
love this, fantastic vid. cant say that enough
Great work.
I'd always heard the famous stuff, but now I know the full story. Thank you.
I’ve been to the battle of Hastings hill it’s very steep !!
french cavarly made huge impacte in this battle
Outstanding thanks
Thank you for learning this
great England that shaped the world
France conquered England and all of Europe
@@adelaidesngan604
it did not only conquer it also colonized
It has been a while since you last posted a video about the Second Punic War, you know.
My family, the Raymond family came across with the Army. Our family seat was just 20 miles east of Norman’s bay at Rye Castle. Raymond (middle and modern English), Reginmund (Old Germanic) or Raimund (old French) is a Germanic name so it’s hard to tell if the name came from the Norse, Danes or the Franks originally.
Amazing story!
nice I had two grandfathers at the Battle of Hastings, one Norman and one Anglo-Saxon but both were nobles in the area of Kent. The Anglo-Saxon was the nobleman before the battle (he died in the battle) while the Norman grandfather took his place when William installed his own vassals and two generations later their grandchildren married tying the two families together.
the Anglo-Saxon grandfather was named Ethelwolf which means Noble Wolf and is my online persona in medieval games. The Norman was named something far too Frenchy for me to remember or pronounce lol
@@ImpeachObamaASAP2010how in the world would you be able to know all this? This was almost a thousand years ago,its quite hard to believe that this could have been research for (forgive me for this) a family, even if they were small nobles.😮
The Counts of Toulouse were often called Raymond, so it's probably more Frankish.
@thibaultsardet7399 No it comes from the old Germanic Reginmumd or Regin meaning council or wise and Mund meaning protector or hand.
I live in York and Stamford bridge is really cool there are Viking ships around it it’s pretty cool
Editor couldn't resist a wilhelm scream at 1:04:12
The Norman invasion of England in 1066 changed English Anglo Saxon culture permanently and dramatically. Although ancient Latin was still the preeminent language of choice among scholars, religious texts and official manuscripts, William imposed French in conquered England forcefully and without restraint. He created a dynastic family in England that lasted centuries which included other French elites that eventually ruled over England (i.e., the Plantagenets from Maine-Anjou region of France). Spoken and written French supplanted angle-Saxon language in the new Norman language. The end result is today’s modern English: a mix of Greek/Latin origin (60%) and remaining angle-Saxon (about 30-40%). The Normans and other French rulers of England did that.
Who are these French elites and French rulers?
According to period sources Anglo-Normans fought hard and well to keep the French out of England...William Longschamps being a perfect example of what happens when a Frenchie thinks he can lord it over the English.
@Girl17FalkPthe english language has 40% of french language in him.
Can you please do the dacian wars
Awesome!
great work though William was not a "great king of England". His reign was basically about crushing every saxon resistance & massacre the local population. After the conquest, he spent most of his time in Normandy where he died in 1087.
"And Ardant du Picq points out that in all his years of conquest, Alexander the Great lost only seven hundred men to the sword. His enemy lost many, many more, but almost all of this occurred after the battle (which appears to have been an almost bloodless pushing match), when the enemy soldiers had turned their backs and begun to run. Carl von Clausewitz makes the same point when he notes that the vast majority of combat losses historically occurred in the pursuit after one side or the other had won the battle. (Why this occurs is a subject that will be looked at in detail in the section "Killing and Physical Distance.")"
[Lt. Col. Dave Grossman, On Killing, Revised Edition, 2009]
Much better channel than Kings and Shills.
Is this about Ukraine?
@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 Something like that.
@@homelessjesse9453 He is biased but I saw him change number of casualties for the Russians from 90k to 10k so he lowkey admitted to false reporting
@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 I just wish they would admit this whole thing started in 2014 and not 2022 like the media has been lying about.
@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 Above all, it is still much too early to talk about it fully.
William and his ancestors were not called "dukes of Normandy " they were counts of Rouen ( at least that's how they styled themselves) .
there was a title leader of the pirates ( dux pyratorum in Latin ) was used in earlier times but the actual duke of Normandy title became official during the plantagenet times 11(1144-1204) angevin period.
In conclusion this title is not what the counts of Rouen called themselves or at least officially recognized.
William and his ancestors were called duke. The bayeux tapstry call william duke. Only one ancestor called himself count of rouen and supposedly no official documents of any norman rulers use that title. Most of the norman rulers called themselves count of normandy. Duke wasn't even commonly used until after 1000.
@@mattgambill5543 you are truly misinformed.
The title duke ( or dux Roman) was used since Roman times , even by regions close to Normandy or neighboring countries before the year 1000 unlike your false claim that it wasn't used before 1000 example....
Nominoe duke of Brittany (800-851) so he was duke 150 years before the year 1000 .
Ranulf duke of Aquitaine ( 820-866)
Reginar longneck duke of Lorraine 850-915
Tassilo 1 duke of Bavaria 560 - 610 , 400 years before the year 1000 .
The title duke of Venice or doge was established in 697 .
Plz stop your juvenile misinformation.
Plus what we call someone today in modern times is different to what they were known officially in their own times .
Today ppl refer to Alfred the great as king of England, when in reality his official title was king of the Anglo-Saxons .
His grandson became king of the english ( not king of England) , it was a few kings later that the term king of England began to circulate.
Same with Normandy, you can't have a duke of a region since the title derived from the normans who invaded it . The adoption came later on .
The title count of Rouen ( named after a town that had been there for centuries) was probably more prestigious than being duke of a group of normans or pirates . That's why it was used .
@ageofechochambers9469 The only thing juvenile is failing to see that i was referring to the normans specifically in their titles. The bayeux tapestry calls william duke. The bay eux tapestry was woven in william's lifetime. William being or calling himself duke was not anachronistic given. As for count of rouen, william the first, son of rollo, was the only one to to use the title count of rouen. I do agree that titles did get assigned anachronistically but not in william the conqueror's case or william I with count of rouen. My source being the royal geneaologies of europe organization.
@@mattgambill5543 the bayeux tapestry is a propaganda piece , william could have referred to himself as king of the world it doesn't make it fact .
It's basically all the events based on how Norman's wanted the narrative to be , it wasn't facts that were agreed Upon by all parties at the time ( church , normans, and the english) .
Did the bayeux tapestry mention that william is a bastard like he was referred to at his birth ?
Did the bayeux tapestry mentioned how william was not supposed to inherit normandy because if his illegitimate birth ?
NO , because it was supposed to legitimize all of williams claims while staying silent on all the disputed facts .
FYI in the norman tapestry Harold ( who william killed at hastings) was referred to as dux ( duke ) before the invasion does that make him a duke ? There wasn't 1 dukedom or duchy in England at the time .
He was an earl and duke and earl were not the same title , proof of that is when williams followers were given titles they were given earldoms and not dukedoms acknowledging that they are different ranks .
So if the bayeux tapestry was accurate as far as titles go they wouldn't call Harold a dux ( or duke ) before the invasion.
Plus Harold is referred to later on by the tapestry as Rex ( king ) does this means the normans recognized him as king of England ? No they didn't they invaded because they saw him as a usurper ( a false pretender ) . But they called him by either how he viewed himself or as the english saw him .
As far as the normans were concerned he wasn't a king that's why they invaded.
History is written by the winners so after the normans won they confirmed what they liked and excluded other things that wasn't desirable in that tapestry .
FYI in an academic discussion claims must be backed by evidence/facts and questions from the opposing side must be addressed.
Until now you have not responded to your claim that the title "duke" didn't come into usage until the year 1000 which I proved your mistaken ( no humility or correction from your side ) .
Plus if the title duke didn't come into usage until 1000 this means according to your claim that the following ppl from williams ancestors weren't dukes ...
1) Rollo not duke since he died in 928
2) William longsword wasn't duke since he died in 942
3)Richard 1 wasn't duke because he died in 996
So your contradicting yourself because by that claim it proves my point that at least the first 3 rulers of normandy weren't dukes but counts of Rouen. Which is fact .
You are not credible ppl in this historical field will read this and know your error , and it happened because you went to Wikipedia read it and thought it's correct ( I researched it and found out is wasn't) .
If you mentioned credible facts I'll respond if you type nonsense I'll ignore you, it's RUclips I can answer serious questions I can't sit here hours giving you a history lesson especially if you argue to argue.
Hi love your videos, an idea for another one the Campaign by Robert the Bruce into Northern England 1314- 1322. Two battles at least
Damn, William did what Mongols would do 200 years early
23:12 in 1882 Arques was renamed Arques-la-bataille to avoid confusion with an homonym town in Picardy.
It’s strange to watch your superb video while knowing a lot of the places mentionned 😉
Hey Buddy can you start making a series on How Marathas defeated mughals in India. There were many battles which happened and a lot of guerilla tacticts which were used by Marathas to defeat mughals. This IMO is Indian Game of Thrones and would take 1 whole series where you can cover different battles such as Battle of Pratapgard, Battle of Pawankind etc. I think you can attract a lot of Indian Audiences from this. Thanks!
“Hinduism and its gods,” says Sir Alfred Lyall:
“are a troubled sea, without shore or visible horizon, driven to and fro by the winds of boundless credulity and grotesque invention. A tangled jungle of disorderly superstitions, ghosts and demons, demi-gods and deified saints, household gods, tribe gods, local gods, universal gods, with their countless shrines and temples, and din of their discordant rites, deities who abhor a fly’s death, those who delight still in human victims, and those who would not either sacrifice or make offerings, such religious chaos.” [Asiatic Studies, Vol 1, pp 2, 3]
@@youwhat491 Cool
Cool video