The moment he mentioned Paul, actually the Moment that I read the title of Sain attached to his name, I knew then that I was going to hear a large volume of words seemingly intellectually spoken of nonsensical reasoning. 😢 It’s sad that we modern day Christians were mislead by those so called church fathers and so called saints that hijacked the teachings of Jesus Christ right out from under The Chosen 11 + 1 Apostle selected from the two qualified disciples that walked with Jesus and themselves through out Jesus’s teachings up to the point of the crucifixion. The Apostles, chosen by Jesus Himself while He was here on Earth and replaced them with the gospels/letters of Saul/Paul of Tarsus who had not one time began or ended his letters saying that these words are the words of God/Jesus that I have brought you. Nor did he say that he was spreading the news that his epistles are the testimonies that he had seen or heard from the witnesses to the works and teachings of Jesus Christ. I never heard Paul’s letters to those churches say repent of your sins and follow The Laws of The Father just as The Son of God followed The Laws while exercising His Grace and Mercy on the down trodden and the Pharisees and Sadducees as well as they mixed and mingled the Laws of God with human traditions made it overwhelming for people under them. The Son of God sacrificed his human flesh in order physically demonstrate the unseen God in order to save the world from its sins. But Paul says follow me as I follow Christ all the while he does not speak in the clear, non-confusing, humility shown to The Father manner and spirit as The Christ, The Son of God and His chosen Apostles whom Paul withstood them and called them hypocrites to their face and wrote letters to churches about it and called those Apostles so called Super Apostles of he was no lesser than. So much for humility from Paul a rather boastful guy who says he doesn’t boast and doesn’t lie.
Didn't paul meet with the apostles multiple times and they didn't rebuke him? If this is true, when the apostles knew what paul was doing why wasn't he loudly renounced in letters from the other apostles? Just a quick question
@@jacobdeville1157 If you are aware that Paul met with the Apostles appointed by Jesus he was calling them So-called Super Apostles, I think he even referred to Peter as a hypocrite and if I’m not mistaken he may have opposed James as well. James is one who is on record as saying faith without works is dead. James is also the one in Acts who knew that the whole city of Jerusalem was aware of the rumors of Paul’s arrival and were in an uproar about Paul supposedly teaching against the law and circumcision to not only Gentiles but Jews, so he suggested to Paul that there are 4 men that were going to be taking the Nazarite vows, pay for their fees and that he also take the vows in n order to prove to the people that he is faithful to the Jewish Laws and Commandments. Sounds like Paul raised some concerns. See Acts 21 chapter. This is when they all read from only one Holy Scripture and that was The Torah and The Prophets, there wasn’t a New Testament and their letters were not considered scriptures, that would have been a death sentence to call their letters or epistles scriptures. Yet somehow 2 Peter is quoted as calling Paul’s teachings as scripture I’m not sure if there were any witnesses other than Paul himself when Jesus elected Paul as an Apostle and I am not sure why Jesus wouldn’t have informed His handpicked Apostles of whom he kept no secret and provided them with the helper, the Holy Ghost, to bring them into remembrance of his teachings and what to say. I don’t want to disbelieve Paul but if The Eleven Apostles guided by The Holy Ghost selected a twelfth apostle in order to maintain 12 after the loss of Judas the betrayer had killed himself then Matias plus Paul equals Thirteen Apostles and that math doesn’t add up to The number of Apostles to be judging in The Book of Revelations equals Twelve. That doesn’t even include all the Apostles and TV evangelists claiming that they have been called by Jesus as well up to this very day this comment is being read. For me Paul’s letters were difficult to read until I understood that more about the Laws, the Covenants and the books of Matthew, Mark and John. Paul may not have made the distinction between the Laws that existed since the beginning from Adam & Eve up to Moses and the Law that came later called the sin/sacrifice offering as well as his calling our natural inclination to seek our on desires a carnal law. He seems to have just used the generic word law without much regard that many years into the future his letters would be read by people without the context of the time period in which he lived. I’m willing to admit that I was warned in 2 Peter that I could become confused by Paul’s letters and I did get confused and I even thought he might be one of the Anti-Christ but I never doubted The Commandments and Laws of God nor The Prophets, Nor The Words of Jesus Christ. I kept searching everyone’s commentaries and RUclips videos on Paul’s teachings comparing Pros and Cons and how he compares with Old Testament Scripture until today I still compare and research but I will rather be on the safe side and be a law practicing Gentile. 🤔📖🙏🏽
![Summer Walker - Heart Of A Woman [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SFddctbZzw8/mqdefault.jpg)
Ty. Love listening to these
Too many ADS 😔 didn't you notice
The moment he mentioned Paul, actually the Moment that I read the title of Sain attached to his name, I knew then that I was going to hear a large volume of words seemingly intellectually spoken of nonsensical reasoning. 😢 It’s sad that we modern day Christians were mislead by those so called church fathers and so called saints that hijacked the teachings of Jesus Christ right out from under The Chosen 11 + 1 Apostle selected from the two qualified disciples that walked with Jesus and themselves through out Jesus’s teachings up to the point of the crucifixion. The Apostles, chosen by Jesus Himself while He was here on Earth and replaced them with the gospels/letters of Saul/Paul of Tarsus who had not one time began or ended his letters saying that these words are the words of God/Jesus that I have brought you. Nor did he say that he was spreading the news that his epistles are the testimonies that he had seen or heard from the witnesses to the works and teachings of Jesus Christ. I never heard Paul’s letters to those churches say repent of your sins and follow The Laws of The Father just as The Son of God followed The Laws while exercising His Grace and Mercy on the down trodden and the Pharisees and Sadducees as well as they mixed and mingled the Laws of God with human traditions made it overwhelming for people under them. The Son of God sacrificed his human flesh in order physically demonstrate the unseen God in order to save the world from its sins. But Paul says follow me as I follow Christ all the while he does not speak in the clear, non-confusing, humility shown to The Father manner and spirit as The Christ, The Son of God and His chosen Apostles whom Paul withstood them and called them hypocrites to their face and wrote letters to churches about it and called those Apostles so called Super Apostles of he was no lesser than. So much for humility from Paul a rather boastful guy who says he doesn’t boast and doesn’t lie.
Didn't paul meet with the apostles multiple times and they didn't rebuke him? If this is true, when the apostles knew what paul was doing why wasn't he loudly renounced in letters from the other apostles? Just a quick question
@@jacobdeville1157 If you are aware that Paul met with the Apostles appointed by Jesus he was calling them So-called Super Apostles, I think he even referred to Peter as a hypocrite and if I’m not mistaken he may have opposed James as well. James is one who is on record as saying faith without works is dead. James is also the one in Acts who knew that the whole city of Jerusalem was aware of the rumors of Paul’s arrival and were in an uproar about Paul supposedly teaching against the law and circumcision to not only Gentiles but Jews, so he suggested to Paul that there are 4 men that were going to be taking the Nazarite vows, pay for their fees and that he also take the vows in n order to prove to the people that he is faithful to the Jewish Laws and Commandments. Sounds like Paul raised some concerns. See Acts 21 chapter.
This is when they all read from only one Holy Scripture and that was The Torah and The Prophets, there wasn’t a New Testament and their letters were not considered scriptures, that would have been a death sentence to call their letters or epistles scriptures. Yet somehow 2 Peter is quoted as calling Paul’s teachings as scripture
I’m not sure if there were any witnesses other than Paul himself when Jesus elected Paul as an Apostle and I am not sure why Jesus wouldn’t have informed His handpicked Apostles of whom he kept no secret and provided them with the helper, the Holy Ghost, to bring them into remembrance of his teachings and what to say. I don’t want to disbelieve Paul but if The Eleven Apostles guided by The Holy Ghost selected a twelfth apostle in order to maintain 12 after the loss of Judas the betrayer had killed himself then Matias plus Paul equals Thirteen Apostles and that math doesn’t add up to The number of Apostles to be judging in The Book of Revelations equals Twelve. That doesn’t even include all the Apostles and TV evangelists claiming that they have been called by Jesus as well up to this very day this comment is being read. For me Paul’s letters were difficult to read until I understood that more about the Laws, the Covenants and the books of Matthew, Mark and John. Paul may not have made the distinction between the Laws that existed since the beginning from Adam & Eve up to Moses and the Law that came later called the sin/sacrifice offering as well as his calling our natural inclination to seek our on desires a carnal law. He seems to have just used the generic word law without much regard that many years into the future his letters would be read by people without the context of the time period in which he lived.
I’m willing to admit that I was warned in 2 Peter that I could become confused by Paul’s letters and I did get confused and I even thought he might be one of the Anti-Christ but I never doubted The Commandments and Laws of God nor The Prophets, Nor The Words of Jesus Christ. I kept searching everyone’s commentaries and RUclips videos on Paul’s teachings comparing Pros and Cons and how he compares with Old Testament Scripture until today I still compare and research but I will rather be on the safe side and be a law practicing Gentile. 🤔📖🙏🏽
Too many ADS 😞 otherwise voice is articulate
Lol these are the same bastards who used the term “rigourism” in an article about Peter Heers and now ya’ll are claiming to be against heresies? 🤦♂️