@@MadmaxMusic93 I was going to get a 2014 fusion used but they are pricey, I ended up getting a 2012 Altima SR 3.5 V6 in gray for 4.5k with 101k miles. Needed regular maintenance but it does the job, I still want a 2019+ fusion.
@@EndlesSuffering yeah mine had 6500 miles on it, now it has almost 19k miles on it just got an oil change recently no problems at all beautiful car!! I would say get a 2019-2020 best year models 2018 ehh idk I mean for no recalls an better reliability
The new 200 is a great looking car, no doubt about it. But their reliability is already horrible. Countless electrical issues, random check engine lights, wheel bearings failing before 20k miles, and don't even get me started on the transmission problems. I hate to say it, but it makes me laugh when I see their TV commercials saying "Reliability is now an American thing" because in reality, it's the exact opposite.
What are you talking about? Lol.... the 200 has good reliability. A few people saying they have issues verses the thousands who say their cars are completely fine. There are Honda’s who’s transmissions fail and Toyota’s who’s engines stall, but no one says a thing. I know 3 people who have 200’s and they’re all going strong. 1 of them needed a new radiator after 85k miles but that’s it, no wheel bearings or check engine lights.
@@matutahoot Chrysler's final generation of the 200 was so awful that it was pulled off the market only three years after initial release. It didn't stay in the lineup a full lifecycle before being cancelled or replaced. That's how terrible the car was.
Not sure why the 200 isn't beating 6seconds to 60, but there's no competition for a V6 with AWD and Uconnect Touch for $35,000. The ACCORD is a boring econo-shitbox. The Fusion looks good but SYNC is garbage. The Altima is for poor people with poor credit scores.
Poor people with poor credit scores? Ummm no... how about smart people with good credit scores I didn't know the type of car you drive showed your credit score typical follower.
bigtruckseriesreview . So please then, enlighten us. How does sync suck? It always understands what I say, it interacts with my phone flawlessly, and I have seriously never had an issue with it. MyFord Touch needs work, but SYNC is *NOT* the same as MyFord Touch.
Random: You know, people criticize Ford for copying Aston Martin front end, but Aston Martin copied the front end of the mustang on their old V8s. So I think its justified.
HDaviator The connection is, Ford were the ones who designed the grill when they owned Aston Martin. Ford also brought back the V8 engine in the form of the V8 Vantage.
My wife and I were actually living in Kentucky when this review was done. We were in the Louisville area however and this looks to be somewhere in the Lexington, or possibly Georgetown area. I still Love my 2015 Chrysler 200C AWD.
I agree they should have compared all cars with the same amount of cylinders To keep it fair The fusion sport has a twin turbo v6 i bet it would smoke that Chrysler
@@TheMetalmachine467 maybe if the Chrysler was a V6 awd or a 4-cylinder fwd if the Chrysler 200 with a 3.6 liter fwd the fusion has no chance 4-cylinder or V6 with a twin turbo. Unless it wasn’t a stoplight race then I would say the fusion would definitely have a chance
@@TheMetalmachine467 your high if you think ford puts there twin turbo dohc six in there mediocre, kinda shitty family sedan. Those are for the raptors and f150 and sometimes a jobber that wants a slow mustamg😂😂😂.
This was a 0-60 test so the clear winner is the Accord. Bring a V6 Camry and toss in a V6 Maxima, the Accord will still win. Take them on the highway and we will still dominate. There is only one Honda Accord and it's #1
Because their cars 5 years ago were bad? Cars built in the past are no indicator of quality of the ones built today as they have nearly no comma laity to those cars.
chabbychab1 yes, yes it is. the Chrysler is AMERICAN made, the profit goes back into America when its purchased because that POS honda is just that a POS. the trans am is also a POS.
Randy Jackson thats funny? if Chrysler was the worst... why did GM have a Mandatory 8.4 MILLION recalls in a month, then the following month recall another 8.4 Million... must be that quality work that chevy puts in their vehicles,lol. fuck off. lolololol
Lol Whatchu Mean ? My Uncle's 1994 Nissan Altima Is Still Going Strong After Being In 2 Wrecks, One Being A Head On Collision . Yeah .. I Think Thats Pretty Good For A 20 Year Old Car . Nissan's Are Built To Last .
Btw WRONG My Dad Also Had An 1986 Maxima With 350k Miles With Out ANY Problems. And My Mom Had An 1994 Altima W/ 279k Miles Before Being Totaled ... And I Have A 2006 Altima That Has Been In 2 Wrecks Aswell And It's Still Running Fine.
Anti-domestic comments like these are truly shameful coming from American citizens. All of these pompous, antiquated remarks & opinions of anything that isn't "foreign" not being able to stand the test of time is terribly narrow-minded. In 10 years, it's very likely that ALL of these vehicles will still be on the road, simply due to the fact that this is 2014, not 2004 or 1994 when quality control was not Job #1 with American automakers. It's time to leave that old-school way of thinking behind. If you live in America, you don't have to support the home teams, but why slander them?
It is not that simple guys that 3 more gears = 30% greater probability of failue compared to the six. Actually this transmission is reliable (the problems were only with early production models).
The Chrysler was close, which also only launched at 1100 rpms and the accord was launched at 3000 rpms. If the Chrysler was launched harder It stands to reason it could pick up the half second it ran behind the Honda.
Got my 200S AWD for about $28K with the 8.4 UConnect, 18" wheels, and convenience package. No other car in its class comes close to that price with all of those options. And the fusion is the only one to offer AWD and it's like $35K lol
+John Appleseed the Legacy and Fusion have wimpy engines. There is nothing wrong with Subaru and they do have the best AWD system, but you really aren't getting much for the price.
I bought a used 2013 200 Touring with the 4 banger with 11,000 miles. I'm up to 18,5XX and have no complaints, other than I wish it got better gas mileage. The outside looks great, and the interior looks and feels like it cost twice as much as it actually did. Really disappointed that Fiat is axing it to build more Rams and Jeeps. I was planning on getting a 2018 model in a few years. What a cluster of a decision. Fiat is delusional if they think these gas prices are going to stay where they are indefinitely, and when those prices go back up, and the truck/SUV market shrivels up again, what are they going to do? They'll have axed their best selling most fuel efficient vehicle to churn out more gas guzzling truck based vehicles. Stupid stupid stupid. They clearly have no long term planning, no foresight. All Fiat sees is immediate short term gains. I don't understand this business decision at all.
Horrible car review. If you are going to do these reviews on multiple cars, then dont test out some v6 and some 4cyl do them all V6 or all 4cyl! Gimmick review!!
I would get the 200 for the nice quality interior and refinement, and with the Pentastar V6 because it's not problematic like the 2.4. Fiat-Chrysler has been making interiors far superior to anything I've driven from Toyota, Chevy, Cadillac (maybe 2014 and 2015 Cadillacs are much better), Ford, and Nissan. I love my 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee for its good interior quality and durability.
I do love Fusion it solved the hard equation Safety+Quality+Performance+Shape+Size all with a reasonable price thanks Ford for giving birth for such little beautiful wild babe FUSION
Fusion looks dated and there are so many of them on the road that it doesn't look "cool" anymore but that 200 in the blue with the sport package is the one to get!! Get a review on that baby
I feel the same about the Fusion, it looks dated now. The front still looks nice but the rest of the car is quite blend. This 200 is somewhat the opposite, the front is elegant if somewhat tame, but the overall detailing throughout is great and it has one of the best back end anywhere. That same back end design wouldn't look out of place at all in a high end luxury coupe.
HondaPro Jason So uhhh, I'm going to call you out on your comment because the 2012 Maxima (not even the 2014) has a 0-60 time of 5.7. And above that the 2012 Acura TL 0-60 is 5.4! So please stfu about your gay honda's. You guys need to stop making Hondas something that they aren't.
They're all fine cars, the midsize segment is hands down the most competitive (maybe after the full sized trucks) segment in the entire automotive industry. Some products are better in some aspects over other products, but you can't really go wrong with any of them. People on the internet who likes to talk trash are idiots to begin with, and I highly doubt they're actually in the market for a midsize family sedan anyway lol.
Pretty sure if it was a Chrysler "sponsored" video they wouldn't let Roman say the Fusion would be his choice, nor would they have shown the Accord's better 0-60 time.
I love my 2015 Chrysler 200, it drives amazing and looks good in my opinion. I think think they look way better than than Honda’s and ford suck in general
Chrysler was afraid to give you guys the V6 Altima because it would have spanked it along with its cousin the Honda! Unreal! Great job as always guys. 👍
Id pick the 200 hands down, i've owned my 2015 200 v6 for 2 years and at 50k miles the only issue i've ever had was having an injecter fail. Not to mention the 0-60 time seems off because i get 5.8 seconds to 60 mp/h and thats only with a few aftermarket parts, the interiors of every other car just looks like garbage compared to it also. I however dont have the chrome ring on the steering wheel.
I'd go with the Altima, it has great fuel economy and I just love the styling. Also if I wanted better performance I could get the 3.5, which happens to get great fuel economy as well.
Really? I wanted to torch the 3.5 Altima we had at the office, the CVT transmission is nothing but trash and I'm being polite, the 2015 Sentra had it too and guess what? I left us stranded in California traffic jam at noon twice......none had more than 35k miles
I am not a Chrysler guy, but I would trade in my Ford for this car. I guess its all about taste, I like the silver trimmed steering wheel, and I love the real wood on the dash. My Grand Marquis with its hard plastic and fake wood feel frumpy.
I personally prefer a vehicle that is reliable, long lasting and economical. With that being said, If I had to choose using my money I would go with the Honda or Toyota. Nissan seems to have stayed the same and haven't upgraded their interior or exterior much over the years and it looks like they have invested in developing a more fuel efficient car and nothing else. I would say ford as well but I'm not convinced yet of their reliability and build quality, the new fords made in the past few years seem to be doing much better with quality and reliability. I would say ford is the most improved car company over the past 15 years and Chryslers overall quality is poor. Working at a tech shop I deal a lot with all of these cars and all have their unique problems but Honda, Toyota and Nissan are always the ones coming in with 150,000+ miles and the interior and exterior is still holding up and everything still works and drives almost like new. Chrysler overall by far seems to always have mechanical issues and the interior wears out extremely fast.
I must admit, I'd prefer either the Chrysler or the Honda. They seem to me like the two best cars in the midsize class. The Honda has the speed and the Chrysler has the quality.
I think it's simple. The others promise while the Accord delivers. It's hard to deny how well rounded the Accord is. You need to look at things subjectively to make the other cars look better than the Accord.
You can say the same thing for every one of those cars, different people will have different needs and wants. The Accord seems to work for you, it won't for everybody else. The notion that something is "best" is one of the dumbest things in the history of humanity. Something can only be "best" to you, how can you tell other people what they think is best or what they like is wrong?
The accord wasn't the best it only recorded the fastest 0-60 time. Other than that the car is just plain boring just like the Camry. And sorry but I wouldn't invest in car that doesn't offer AWD. The 200 is a better car. The end.
turshin To be fair, from all indications the Accord does drive really, really well for a family sedan. It certainly has its weak points, but driving dynamics doesn't seem to be it. I do give Honda credit for that especially after putting out worse and worse driving products in the last decade.
I average 29-30 mpg driving back and forth to work with my 2015 Fusion Titanium, which is pretty much all highway except for slowing down through a couple of towns. I averaged about 32 between Indiana and Arkansas. Again, 90% highway. City driving or having a little fun definitely makes it a little thirsty. It's probably (much to my surprise the first year I had it) the best vehicle I've had for winter driving.
I bought a brand new 2015 Chrysler 300S V6. its now May 2017 and I have had ZERO ISSUES. replaced a window wiper, I live in seattle and it rains over 300 days a year here.
Accord, easily. Tramples all in the 0-60 and it is, afterall, a Honda. The Fusion would be my second choice, but I do not like the interior, the price, or its acceleration. The 200C would be my third choice here, but the styling will look ordinary in 6 months. The Accord's styling may be conservative, but it's timelessly handsome and it looks like it belongs in a class above. The Fusion looks great, but, for some reason, it still translates to "non-premium class" on the road.
Take off the AWD and the ventilated seats and probably the self parking and you have a faster car, that will cost 32k, that competes in features to the Accord, and maybe have a bit more stuff like a better sound system, there is a lot of useless stuff in the Fusion that makes it a lot more expensive then it needs to be.
Pedro Thevenard Man, where to start. So much wrong with the Fusion outside of it styling. It's a 4-cylinder Ecoboost, yet gets less combined mpg than the 6-cylinder Accord (and it probably has more speeds in the transmission which worsens it for Ford). It has AWD and 240hp, which should have made it competitive in 0-60, but the Accord wasted it, easily. And it cost $38k. Nothing about it makes sense, really.
***** And how exactly is the 200's 6.94 sec 0-60 faster than the Accord's 6.23 sec? Maybe you didn't get to the math lessons on decimals or something. AND the Accord did it with a 6-speed trans vs. the 200's 9-speed trans. AND with said transmissions, the Accord get better mpg.
The Fusion in this video is really expensive at $38,000. Don't be fooled, though, I priced one out on Ford's website for about $28,000 with the 2.0 Ecoboost, heated leather seats, and great looking wheels. I didn't bother with MyFordTouch because, honestly, I don't trust it. My point is, the Fusion isn't as overpriced as it seems.
The Chrysler 200 is something I would never buy. They are only cars that you would rather "Lease" so that the next sucker that buys it on a used lot ends up dealing with an unreliable car and all the issues that a Chrysler is famous for having.
+Bjorn Ironsides Well, since the 200 has only been manufactured for 6 years... its hard to have much of a reputation, I have heard though, that they do fall apart quite easily.
+Trix Rabbit You are wrong. this car has been in the market for alot longer than you think. the 200 is only a re-named Sebring. Its what American car companies do. re-name their cars and just sell you the same crappy car. Like the Ford Escort became the Focus. The Contour became the Fusion. For Dodge, the Neon became the Dart. The Chevy Cavalier became the Cobalt and then to the Cruze so renamed 3 times to fool people that its a Whole new car.
Guys, I'd like to point out in the real world most people are getting those loaded Fusions for more than $6000 off MSRP, while you'll barely get your Mazda dealer to budge a grand on the 6 or 3. A $32,000 Fusion in the real world is a much fairer fight.
That's a fair point, and something that doesn't make it into car reviews enough IMO. All the tech sites use reality checks like Amazon and Newegg when doing price comparisons...car reviewers should use TrueCar, TrueDelta, KBB, Edmunds...something.
I'd take the Fusion, but not in that specification. In Canada, the Titanium runs nearly $40k! The 200 is a great looking car, and the Alfa Romeo Gulietta platform underneath makes it a decent handler too. But I don't have the trust of Chrysler's reliability, so I'll wait a couple of years first. The Accord is a good car, but almost as boring as the Camry, because every other person in the world who doesn't own a Camry owns an Accord. And I don't like that.
Giulietta is a smaller compact car so I don't think it's a good base for mid-size sedan (and the suspension was tuned by Chrysler so it's not a good signd either). Fusion is about the same price as 200, they just chose full spec version (with AWD which makes it heavier and slower).
All the Honda did was record the fastest 0-60 time. Other than that it nothing else that stood out. And had the 200 not spun it wheels slightly it would have recorded 6.5. And the awd drive version will be even quicker. Sorry but the 200 won.
***** I wish Mazda would offer a more potent powertrain with the 6, along with a better info/nav system. If Mazda fixed those two issues, it would be heads and tails above anything in the class, IMO.
Great review. Seriously I like the most bang for the buck. Ford Fusion is very nice but way to much money. Never liked Canary's. Honda is a bit pricey although holds it's re-sale value well and known for their dependability. Altima is so-so but I don't like the CV transmission. My choice would be the Chrysler 200 with the 3.6 Penestar. Plenty of power, decent ride and great price.
its 28 combined according to sticker.. but ive always gotten pretty close to the highway MPG all the time out of the fusion which I think is impressive at 36 for FWD and still 31 in an AWD vehicle.
9.12s on the 2.5L 4-cylinder Camry? That doesn't make sense at all to me.. I have posted an 8.0s average over 50+ runs in my 2015 2.5L XSE. Is the 2014 that different, or what?
RUclips Aneesh There is some shit going on. 12-14 i4 Camry's are rated at 7.9 in 0-60. I'm also the living proof by the way..., plus the way the audio was cut out in the Camry's testing- what a coincidence, & suspicious at the same time, heh. I'ts like they got paid to stf-up and help other cars sell...
Yeah I've actually heard something from a Toyota representative before while I was in a 15 le. I wasn't listening closely but he mentioned some part of the car's body being redesigned putting the 0-60 time down almost a full second
Deadpool you're not in radiology because you can't even spell properly. Maybe next time you should watch the god damn video before you start calling people morons, you jackass.
I bought a new Chrysler 200C and have to say I quiet happy. 40K miles and absolutely no problems. i get 30 MPG with the v6 which rocks, but to be fair i do most of my driving on the highway. The interior is epic, still love it. The thing is great in the snow as well
@@camroon8450 To Much Money On Repairs 🤨🤔 She Was Good For The First 4/5 Years No Repairs Just Oil Change But Now Every 6 Months I'm Repairing Something Plus The Oil Change 🤯 My Next Car Will Be A Tesla 🙃 Hoping I'll Have One Around This Time Next Year 🤗
Swap out the Altima for a Malibu. I don't like Ford personally but the Fusion is a pretty car. If I was going to buy a car for reliability and quality I would have to go with the Camry or the Malibu.
The awd Fusion saps a lot of power, the reg fwd is much quicker. I have a Vbox and timed ours at 6.5 to 60 (good ol' sea level South FL lol). Have to say we drove all the cars in the class except for the new Mazda6, the Fusion was just the best overall, there's a solidness to it and fit finish that makes the Camry feel like a cheap tin can (same for Altima), and it rides way nicer and handles far better then the Camry (seriously that car was a pos, no wonder Toyota is rushing to update it after all the complaints online. My neighbor has only owned Camrys for like 20 years and thought everything else was crap, she went for a ride in our Fusion and blown away how much nicer all around the Fusion was. Accord was close, the V6 was quicker, but the Fusion was just so nice for the $, got the SE loaded. Accord was even missing the sporty character but it was the closest, Ford nailed the chassis and suspension on this car. Chrysler 200 don't care for so far, and odd that a new smaller, lighter car with a 9 speed auto basically gets the same mpg as the much larger and heavier 300 with an 8 speed auto and same V6.
The 200 is branded as a mid-size luxury sedan. Where's the Acura TLX? Where's the other mid size luxury sedans? Yes, the 200 is cheaper, but you get what you pay for.
they are saying chrysler will be in the bottom everyman slot. doge - perfomance. so basically chrysler is going to be the new plymouth. going against ford , chevy. not a premium brand. from what i have read recently.
That's cute, you think the new 200 is a luxury sedan. So considering it's actually just a normal mass-produced mid-size sedan you're admitting it is better than the competition.
these are not luxury sedans plus , they , fiat , is moving to the plymouth / dodge slot , like a for or a chevy thats what i have read dodge is supposed to be aimed at the performance type crap and dont forget - the charger/challenge are still based on an older mercedes e class chassis , that was improved by the italians
Chrysler is Dodge's upscale brand, so why not use the other upscale brands, such as Acura, Infiniti, etc. Buying a 200 is like buying Walmart dress shoes, looks ok on the cheap, but much better alternatives.
I have a V6 2007 camry and that thing is quite fast for their class. It can cruise 100mph on Italian highways and 60mph on normal street daily. For a 7 yrs old car, have had 0 issue with it.
I drive an audi a4 but if I had to pick between any of these cars I would pick the fusion, it's just way sexy and iconic good looking car!! And the cryslers led lights looks amazing similar to the audi a8.
I like how they compare the $25k Camry and the $25k Altima and then decide that these 2 have the cheapest interiors. The V6 Camry has the fastest 0-60 here.
My pick would be the car with the fewest maintenance items. I know the Honda V6 is a great car. I just wouldn't want to pay for a timing belt job though, or even do it myself for that matter.
Chrysler will never be on top of anything but the unreliable list. They've sucked for years. They think this 1 car speaks for the entire company as a whole. A few people have a problem with a Toyota and they assume it's junk. Lol. Chrysler builds one halfway decent car and suddenly Everyone thinks they're the best! Lol!! They've changed hands from the Germans to the Italians. Chrysler is horrible in so many ways.
Nathaniel Rudolph so in other words, RUclips is the Only thing you go to on the internet?? Lol. Read Consumer Reports, son. Chrysler is way worse. Oh, and Jeep Cherokee is on the not recommended list..sad..They're ranked horribly. They've been owned by Daimler, an independent group, the Nazis, and now Italians. They suck..simple. where do you get your information from? Toyota and Lexus are the most reliable in Consumer Reports. When I read your comment, I concluded that your just wishful.
David Lombana you know it is still licenced by Honda still right? where do you think the PROFIT from a HONDA goes? it does not stay in America. when you buy a car the Profit goes back to the Country of Origin. and Japan is where the Brand Honda is from. only a small portion of that car is left here in the US to pay the workers, but the remaining portion goes to the Manufactures country. you might wanna learn some shit, ser.
+Deadpool wow. I find your lack of information disturbing guy. Go google how much American Honda generates in revenue and employment directly/indirectly in Ohio alone. Although it has roots in Japan, American Honda is an American company. Sure money makes it back to the parent company. But what large corporation with overseas assets isn't receiving money from their subsidiaries? They are businesses...While you're at it stop typing in whatever phone or computer you're using to access RUclips. Chances are that you're lining the pockets of a Taiwanese electronics conglomerate right now. Wake up its the 21st century.
A little biased I must say. I mean anyone who has driven a 3.5 camry knows that those cars haul ass. I really wanna see my v6 camry go up against that Chrysler Honda and ford
I can get my chrysler 200s to 0-60 in 6 sec or less in sport mode and shift with paddles plus the 200s has nicer interior , mine is black on black with blue interior trim
I think the interiors are personal preference. The Chrysler to me looks too much like a space ship inside, meanwhile the Accord and Camry are very simple and clean. Ford did a good job of combining a little bit of both.
+violian5 - For a sucker looking at the best Titanium on the lot with custom paint and wheels maybe. Otherwise you should top out at about 32 for a Fusion.
pcuser1541 Not a bad list man. I'd switch the Camry and Accord around in V6 versions and back to the way you have it in the 2.5L 4-cylinder versions. Some people get so emotionally invested into the company they drive and that inhibits them from thinking clearly. I drive a Toyota Camry (2015, XSE 2.5L) but I have no qualms admitting that the 2.5L Accord is a better engine.
I would put the Camry at the bottom of the list because it is butt ugly, outdated, cheaply finished, and extremely overpriced. Though the rest are all nice, second last would be the Altima thanks to the CVT.
You guys are comparing cars with 4 cylinder , turbo 4 cylinder and V6 engines that vary greatly in price. How bout apples and apples? You guys choose a Chrysler and a Ford over a Camry? No way. Your bias shows in video after video.
for all you Honda haters... try my 04 accord 364 k miles and still runs like new.... still have my original exhaust, wheel bearings and many other ORIGINAL PARTS...!!!!!
This video is leaned towards Chrysler, noticed they used 2014 models to a 2015 model it's all sponsorships chysrlers paid him to make the Chrysler loom faster and better for marketing
That's just stupid. If the video was sponsored by Chrysler they wouldn't have let the one guy pick the Fusion for his favorite, and they wouldn't of shown a better 0-60 time for the Accord. I've been watching these guys videos for quite some time now, and I've never found them to be biased.
I dont care people might say i love the Ford Fusion, beautiful interior and smart tech
Ford fusion baby!!! I got a 2019 I love mine looks even more better sexier with new titanium mesh chrome grill
@Random Autonomous Drone Pilot just like you lmfao slow ugly and pos 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣
@@MadmaxMusic93 I was going to get a 2014 fusion used but they are pricey, I ended up getting a 2012 Altima SR 3.5 V6 in gray for 4.5k with 101k miles. Needed regular maintenance but it does the job, I still want a 2019+ fusion.
@@EndlesSuffering yeah mine had 6500 miles on it, now it has almost 19k miles on it just got an oil change recently no problems at all beautiful car!! I would say get a 2019-2020 best year models 2018 ehh idk I mean for no recalls an better reliability
@Random Autonomous Drone Pilot yeah I agree that describes the Chrysler.
The new 200 is a great looking car, no doubt about it. But their reliability is already horrible. Countless electrical issues, random check engine lights, wheel bearings failing before 20k miles, and don't even get me started on the transmission problems. I hate to say it, but it makes me laugh when I see their TV commercials saying "Reliability is now an American thing" because in reality, it's the exact opposite.
Sweet Jones Get a new car before yours dies lol
Diamond Eyes are you talking to me?
What are you talking about? Lol.... the 200 has good reliability. A few people saying they have issues verses the thousands who say their cars are completely fine. There are Honda’s who’s transmissions fail and Toyota’s who’s engines stall, but no one says a thing. I know 3 people who have 200’s and they’re all going strong. 1 of them needed a new radiator after 85k miles but that’s it, no wheel bearings or check engine lights.
@@matutahoot Chrysler's final generation of the 200 was so awful that it was pulled off the market only three years after initial release. It didn't stay in the lineup a full lifecycle before being cancelled or replaced. That's how terrible the car was.
Not sure why the 200 isn't beating 6seconds to 60, but there's no competition for a V6 with AWD and Uconnect Touch for $35,000.
The ACCORD is a boring econo-shitbox.
The Fusion looks good but SYNC is garbage.
The Altima is for poor people with poor credit scores.
My Ford Touch needs work, but Sync itself is awesome. I have never had any issues at all with Sync.
SYNC SUCKS.
Poor people with poor credit scores? Ummm no... how about smart people with good credit scores I didn't know the type of car you drive showed your credit score typical follower.
Yeah- it does
bigtruckseriesreview . So please then, enlighten us. How does sync suck? It always understands what I say, it interacts with my phone flawlessly, and I have seriously never had an issue with it. MyFord Touch needs work, but SYNC is *NOT* the same as MyFord Touch.
Random: You know, people criticize Ford for copying Aston Martin front end, but Aston Martin copied the front end of the mustang on their old V8s. So I think its justified.
You know at one point Ford owned Aston Martin.
***** Ford Acquired Aston after the V8 had been retired. Don't see the connection.
HDaviator The connection is, Ford were the ones who designed the grill when they owned Aston Martin. Ford also brought back the V8 engine in the form of the V8 Vantage.
***** they also bought jaguar and rover as well.
USCisgay but completely irrelevant for this statement
My wife and I were actually living in Kentucky when this review was done. We were in the Louisville area however and this looks to be somewhere in the Lexington, or possibly Georgetown area. I still Love my 2015 Chrysler 200C AWD.
Why didn't they provide a V6 Camry and Altima to make it fair?
+pedrof830 Well, Chrysler provided these vehicles I think .....
I agree they should have compared all cars with the same amount of cylinders
To keep it fair
The fusion sport has a twin turbo v6 i bet it would smoke that Chrysler
@@TheMetalmachine467 maybe if the Chrysler was a V6 awd or a 4-cylinder fwd if the Chrysler 200 with a 3.6 liter fwd the fusion has no chance 4-cylinder or V6 with a twin turbo. Unless it wasn’t a stoplight race then I would say the fusion would definitely have a chance
@@TheMetalmachine467 your high if you think ford puts there twin turbo dohc six in there mediocre, kinda shitty family sedan. Those are for the raptors and f150 and sometimes a jobber that wants a slow mustamg😂😂😂.
or awd,, that slowed the fusion down..extra weight..not really a fair test.. chrysler had to load the deck on this one
This was a 0-60 test so the clear winner is the Accord. Bring a V6 Camry and toss in a V6 Maxima, the Accord will still win. Take them on the highway and we will still dominate. There is only one Honda Accord and it's #1
i just wish they had AWD version.
Oscar Halder Yeah too bad they don't have AWD...
vader11111 its called the acura tl
the accord is a beast watch my videos of my v6 raping whole bunch of v8 muscle cars
its not tuned dumbass, there is no tunes for the v6 so get your shit right fuck tard
I can't believe the Chrysler is in production as of 2014. It just looks too good.
The words "Chrysler" and "Reliable" should never be in the same sentence.
Because their cars 5 years ago were bad? Cars built in the past are no indicator of quality of the ones built today as they have nearly no comma laity to those cars.
+chabbychab1 and yet its better then what you drive,lol.
+Deadpool I drive a 2015 Accord and a 1991 Trans Am so no, the Chrysler is not better than what I drive
chabbychab1 yes, yes it is. the Chrysler is AMERICAN made, the profit goes back into America when its purchased because that POS honda is just that a POS. the trans am is also a POS.
Randy Jackson thats funny? if Chrysler was the worst... why did GM have a Mandatory 8.4 MILLION recalls in a month, then the following month recall another 8.4 Million... must be that quality work that chevy puts in their vehicles,lol. fuck off. lolololol
Bring all these cars back in 10 years. The Honda and Toyota will be the only 2 left standing. All the rest will be in the scrapyard.
Bah. My 2002 Altima would beat the shit out of both those cars.
Lol Whatchu Mean ? My Uncle's 1994 Nissan Altima Is Still Going Strong After Being In 2 Wrecks, One Being A Head On Collision . Yeah .. I Think Thats Pretty Good For A 20 Year Old Car . Nissan's Are Built To Last .
Nissan is just as reliable as Honda and Toyota, minus the unintended acceleration
Btw WRONG My Dad Also Had An 1986 Maxima With 350k Miles With Out ANY Problems. And My Mom Had An 1994 Altima W/ 279k Miles Before Being Totaled ... And I Have A 2006 Altima That Has Been In 2 Wrecks Aswell And It's Still Running Fine.
Anti-domestic comments like these are truly shameful coming from American citizens. All of these pompous, antiquated remarks & opinions of anything that isn't "foreign" not being able to stand the test of time is terribly narrow-minded. In 10 years, it's very likely that ALL of these vehicles will still be on the road, simply due to the fact that this is 2014, not 2004 or 1994 when quality control was not Job #1 with American automakers. It's time to leave that old-school way of thinking behind. If you live in America, you don't have to support the home teams, but why slander them?
Other reviews have been getting 6.5 0-60 in the 200. And I sorry but the interior of the 200 is 10x better than any of these cars!!! I love it
As I said in the video, I encountered wheel-spin.
Nah fusions is much better
9 speed automatic in a Chrysler, that's like breakdown waiting to happen
I was thinking the exact same thing
It is not that simple guys that 3 more gears = 30% greater probability of failue compared to the six. Actually this transmission is reliable (the problems were only with early production models).
My 200S AWD has 125k and I have not had any problems. It's been a good car.
twadney better not jinx it
2015 Chrysler 200 S AWD reporting in. My cars 4 years old and I've not had a single issue except for a screw in my tire :(
Unfortunately, the Chrysler is most likely the least reliable. It will do fine as a rental.
The accord is faster than I thought it would be...It's faster than all of them
The Chrysler was close, which also only launched at 1100 rpms and the accord was launched at 3000 rpms. If the Chrysler was launched harder It stands to reason it could pick up the half second it ran behind the Honda.
Got my 200S AWD for about $28K with the 8.4 UConnect, 18" wheels, and convenience package. No other car in its class comes close to that price with all of those options. And the fusion is the only one to offer AWD and it's like $35K lol
but it's designed and made in America. I wouldn't want that shit.
+Michael Majdanski What about the Legacy?
+John Appleseed the Legacy and Fusion have wimpy engines. There is nothing wrong with Subaru and they do have the best AWD system, but you really aren't getting much for the price.
Julio Romeresto Oh.
@@ryanc5198 I hope you're not American. Still better than any of that foreign trash.
The Chrysler 200 is sweet! I want one!
Said nobody ever 🤣 one of the worst cars ever built
I bought a used 2013 200 Touring with the 4 banger with 11,000 miles. I'm up to 18,5XX and have no complaints, other than I wish it got better gas mileage. The outside looks great, and the interior looks and feels like it cost twice as much as it actually did.
Really disappointed that Fiat is axing it to build more Rams and Jeeps. I was planning on getting a 2018 model in a few years.
What a cluster of a decision. Fiat is delusional if they think these gas prices are going to stay where they are indefinitely, and when those prices go back up, and the truck/SUV market shrivels up again, what are they going to do? They'll have axed their best selling most fuel efficient vehicle to churn out more gas guzzling truck based vehicles.
Stupid stupid stupid.
They clearly have no long term planning, no foresight. All Fiat sees is immediate short term gains. I don't understand this business decision at all.
Dirk Diggler they want their fiats to take over the small to mid size car segment.
I'll take the fusion! best looking and an awesome 2.0T ecoboost and awd!
Horrible car review. If you are going to do these reviews on multiple cars, then dont test out some v6 and some 4cyl do them all V6 or all 4cyl! Gimmick review!!
Like they said in the video, this is what Chrysler provided them with. They didn't get to pick the cars.
Chrysler gave them those cars to test they didn't choose, that is why it's called a mashup... did you even watch the video?
I guess they have to pay the bills huh? It does take away their credibility doing this type of video. It felt like a paid infomercial.
Some car makers chose a 4 cylinder with a turbo to compete with v6s as the high engine trim.
Nice work, gents. One of the better reviews so far this year.
I am with Roman, I'll buy because of the looks and the Ford Fusion is the best looking sedan out of the 5 tested.
I'll admit the fusion is a good looking car but the interior from that 200 should be in a 50,000$ car instead of a 35,000$ car
Yeh, but I wonder how the interior looks in the base model car because it starts at only $21,700 and $35,000 is very high compared to that.
TJBellamy99 Like the Cherokee, the 200 Interior looks similar in all trims, just one wouldnt have the open pour wood trim like the 200C and S trim.
Tomaz Hilton Oh.
I would get the 200 for the nice quality interior and refinement, and with the Pentastar V6 because it's not problematic like the 2.4. Fiat-Chrysler has been making interiors far superior to anything I've driven from Toyota, Chevy, Cadillac (maybe 2014 and 2015 Cadillacs are much better), Ford, and Nissan. I love my 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee for its good interior quality and durability.
I do love Fusion
it solved the hard equation
Safety+Quality+Performance+Shape+Size all with a reasonable price
thanks Ford for giving birth for such little beautiful wild babe
FUSION
and now its dead thanks ford
The camry v6 eat those engines
Fusion looks dated and there are so many of them on the road that it doesn't look "cool" anymore but that 200 in the blue with the sport package is the one to get!! Get a review on that baby
I am with you the new 200 is very sexy, sophisticated, business class, and grown up.
I feel the same about the Fusion, it looks dated now. The front still looks nice but the rest of the car is quite blend.
This 200 is somewhat the opposite, the front is elegant if somewhat tame, but the overall detailing throughout is great and it has one of the best back end anywhere. That same back end design wouldn't look out of place at all in a high end luxury coupe.
the 200 doesn’t look too much better and it’s not reliable at all. the fusion can look sexy if you get the right color and rims
Jonah Karty I’d rather have something more reliable and the fusion is sexy af
I wish the Ford Fusion had a V6. :(
I think Ford won't put it in because the v6's are too "thirsty"
Something I found out about is that Obama gave Ford money and in exchange they have to produce more fuel efficient vehicles.
wesworld98 I have a 2018 sport model and it has a twin turbo V6
@@anthonybarr2549 Yeah things change in six years
MrVnick1 keeps up with my girlfriends BMW 5 series. Crazy lol
HondaPro Jason So uhhh, I'm going to call you out on your comment because the 2012 Maxima (not even the 2014) has a 0-60 time of 5.7. And above that the 2012 Acura TL 0-60 is 5.4! So please stfu about your gay honda's. You guys need to stop making Hondas something that they aren't.
Acuras are technically hondas so....
Its very interesting how they didn't bring the V6 Camry lol people can hate all they want but that v6 Camry is one hell of a car!
They're all fine cars, the midsize segment is hands down the most competitive (maybe after the full sized trucks) segment in the entire automotive industry.
Some products are better in some aspects over other products, but you can't really go wrong with any of them. People on the internet who likes to talk trash are idiots to begin with, and I highly doubt they're actually in the market for a midsize family sedan anyway lol.
This is dumb.....Why not do all V6 cars?
That Chrysler sponsorship, from the way the car is parked to the description. This is obviously a review that shouldn't be taken seriously.
Pretty sure if it was a Chrysler "sponsored" video they wouldn't let Roman say the Fusion would be his choice, nor would they have shown the Accord's better 0-60 time.
I love my 2015 Chrysler 200, it drives amazing and looks good in my opinion. I think think they look way better than than Honda’s and ford suck in general
I agree!
Chrysler was afraid to give you guys the V6 Altima because it would have spanked it along with its cousin the Honda! Unreal! Great job as always guys. 👍
Lmao, Sure 😉
Id pick the 200 hands down, i've owned my 2015 200 v6 for 2 years and at 50k miles the only issue i've ever had was having an injecter fail. Not to mention the 0-60 time seems off because i get 5.8 seconds to 60 mp/h and thats only with a few aftermarket parts, the interiors of every other car just looks like garbage compared to it also. I however dont have the chrome ring on the steering wheel.
How did you made an Altima to achieve more than 8 seconds?
I have one 2010 and it makes 7.6.
Did Nissan reduced HP or increased weight?
I'd go with the Altima, it has great fuel economy and I just love the styling. Also if I wanted better performance I could get the 3.5, which happens to get great fuel economy as well.
Really? I wanted to torch the 3.5 Altima we had at the office, the CVT transmission is nothing but trash and I'm being polite, the 2015 Sentra had it too and guess what? I left us stranded in California traffic jam at noon twice......none had more than 35k miles
@@freak227z I'd go with camry.
@@leopardsky very solid choice, those last long although I feel they are too common and boring on my opinion
I am not a Chrysler guy, but I would trade in my Ford for this car. I guess its all about taste, I like the silver trimmed steering wheel, and I love the real wood on the dash. My Grand Marquis with its hard plastic and fake wood feel frumpy.
I personally prefer a vehicle that is reliable, long lasting and economical. With that being said, If I had to choose using my money I would go with the Honda or Toyota. Nissan seems to have stayed the same and haven't upgraded their interior or exterior much over the years and it looks like they have invested in developing a more fuel efficient car and nothing else. I would say ford as well but I'm not convinced yet of their reliability and build quality, the new fords made in the past few years seem to be doing much better with quality and reliability. I would say ford is the most improved car company over the past 15 years and Chryslers overall quality is poor. Working at a tech shop I deal a lot with all of these cars and all have their unique problems but Honda, Toyota and Nissan are always the ones coming in with 150,000+ miles and the interior and exterior is still holding up and everything still works and drives almost like new. Chrysler overall by far seems to always have mechanical issues and the interior wears out extremely fast.
Chrysler sucks.
I must admit, I'd prefer either the Chrysler or the Honda. They seem to me like the two best cars in the midsize class. The Honda has the speed and the Chrysler has the quality.
Clark Packard This is 2014, not 2004... Your apparently negative opinion of Chrysler's quality in general is antiquated.
Great review, guys. I agree with both of you, 200 anf Fusion are top of the class.
Yeah they are. They don't really compete with the camary or the altima or the accord because the are much more luxurious and have much more features
the word toyota and "fun" should never be in the same sentence.
I think it's simple. The others promise while the Accord delivers. It's hard to deny how well rounded the Accord is. You need to look at things subjectively to make the other cars look better than the Accord.
Seck Vlogs noooo your ugly who ever you are ugly ass
You can say the same thing for every one of those cars, different people will have different needs and wants. The Accord seems to work for you, it won't for everybody else.
The notion that something is "best" is one of the dumbest things in the history of humanity. Something can only be "best" to you, how can you tell other people what they think is best or what they like is wrong?
The accord wasn't the best it only recorded the fastest 0-60 time. Other than that the car is just plain boring just like the Camry. And sorry but I wouldn't invest in car that doesn't offer AWD. The 200 is a better car. The end.
turshin To be fair, from all indications the Accord does drive really, really well for a family sedan.
It certainly has its weak points, but driving dynamics doesn't seem to be it. I do give Honda credit for that especially after putting out worse and worse driving products in the last decade.
Kris L I agree with youuuuu
Chrysler 200-Michigan
Accord-Ohio
Altima-Tennessee or Mississippi
Camry-Kentucky
Ford-Mexico
Haha the Camry looks and feels like a fossil compared to the others!
But it’s still around & selling well...Umm where’s the Chrysler 200 today? 🙂
@@penvon still around in 2020
@@penvon and still one of the best selling cars
So Ford is slower, more expensive, less fuel efficient than Honda and most importantly less reliable.
I can't wait for the Fusion sport!
I average 29-30 mpg driving back and forth to work with my 2015 Fusion Titanium, which is pretty much all highway except for slowing down through a couple of towns. I averaged about 32 between Indiana and Arkansas. Again, 90% highway. City driving or having a little fun definitely makes it a little thirsty. It's probably (much to my surprise the first year I had it) the best vehicle I've had for winter driving.
Why pit 4 cylinders against a V6 in a 0-60 test? This video doesn't make sense.
I bought a brand new 2015 Chrysler 300S V6. its now May 2017 and I have had ZERO ISSUES. replaced a window wiper, I live in seattle and it rains over 300 days a year here.
Accord, easily. Tramples all in the 0-60 and it is, afterall, a Honda. The Fusion would be my second choice, but I do not like the interior, the price, or its acceleration. The 200C would be my third choice here, but the styling will look ordinary in 6 months. The Accord's styling may be conservative, but it's timelessly handsome and it looks like it belongs in a class above. The Fusion looks great, but, for some reason, it still translates to "non-premium class" on the road.
Take off the AWD and the ventilated seats and probably the self parking and you have a faster car, that will cost 32k, that competes in features to the Accord, and maybe have a bit more stuff like a better sound system, there is a lot of useless stuff in the Fusion that makes it a lot more expensive then it needs to be.
***** you ugly the 200 is not pretty foreal it looks like the my ass
***** no your didn't you wish you had your jealous with you ugly ass!
Pedro Thevenard Man, where to start. So much wrong with the Fusion outside of it styling. It's a 4-cylinder Ecoboost, yet gets less combined mpg than the 6-cylinder Accord (and it probably has more speeds in the transmission which worsens it for Ford). It has AWD and 240hp, which should have made it competitive in 0-60, but the Accord wasted it, easily. And it cost $38k. Nothing about it makes sense, really.
***** And how exactly is the 200's 6.94 sec 0-60 faster than the Accord's 6.23 sec? Maybe you didn't get to the math lessons on decimals or something. AND the Accord did it with a 6-speed trans vs. the 200's 9-speed trans. AND with said transmissions, the Accord get better mpg.
The Fusion in this video is really expensive at $38,000. Don't be fooled, though, I priced one out on Ford's website for about $28,000 with the 2.0 Ecoboost, heated leather seats, and great looking wheels. I didn't bother with MyFordTouch because, honestly, I don't trust it. My point is, the Fusion isn't as overpriced as it seems.
The Chrysler 200 is something I would never buy. They are only cars that you would rather "Lease" so that the next sucker that buys it on a used lot ends up dealing with an unreliable car and all the issues that a Chrysler is famous for having.
You're absolutely right
+Bjorn Ironsides Well, since the 200 has only been manufactured for 6 years... its hard to have much of a reputation, I have heard though, that they do fall apart quite easily.
this is not the 80's This is a top of the line vehicle
+Trix Rabbit You are wrong. this car has been in the market for alot longer than you think. the 200 is only a re-named Sebring. Its what American car companies do. re-name their cars and just sell you the same crappy car. Like the Ford Escort became the Focus. The Contour became the Fusion. For Dodge, the Neon became the Dart. The Chevy Cavalier became the Cobalt and then to the Cruze so renamed 3 times to fool people that its a Whole new car.
+jldude84 So right. F series been around SO long but still cant hold its value as well as a toyota. wonder why....
Guys, I'd like to point out in the real world most people are getting those loaded Fusions for more than $6000 off MSRP, while you'll barely get your Mazda dealer to budge a grand on the 6 or 3. A $32,000 Fusion in the real world is a much fairer fight.
That's a fair point, and something that doesn't make it into car reviews enough IMO. All the tech sites use reality checks like Amazon and Newegg when doing price comparisons...car reviewers should use TrueCar, TrueDelta, KBB, Edmunds...something.
I'd take the Fusion, but not in that specification. In Canada, the Titanium runs nearly $40k!
The 200 is a great looking car, and the Alfa Romeo Gulietta platform underneath makes it a decent handler too. But I don't have the trust of Chrysler's reliability, so I'll wait a couple of years first.
The Accord is a good car, but almost as boring as the Camry, because every other person in the world who doesn't own a Camry owns an Accord. And I don't like that.
Giulietta is a smaller compact car so I don't think it's a good base for mid-size sedan (and the suspension was tuned by Chrysler so it's not a good signd either). Fusion is about the same price as 200, they just chose full spec version (with AWD which makes it heavier and slower).
sic22l Motortrend tested the 200 AWD and ran 0-60 in 5.8 Seconds.
sic22l I think your idea of "platform sharing" is a wee bit out of date.
sic22l so a VW pheaton doesn't make a good Bentley continental?/flying spur?
Tomaz Hilton Actually the Continental is based on the Audi A8/S8 platform.
Doesn't the Nissan sport mode actually decrease performance with the fake shifting?
The new 2014 Honda Accord wins yet another challenge!
***** Wheel slippage is probably because of lack of traction. Don't know of course.
***** The honda still had its traction control on.
***** People have already recorded 5.4-5.5 for the 2013-14 accord v6 auto.
J30A4V6er yea... Coupe form
All the Honda did was record the fastest 0-60 time. Other than that it nothing else that stood out. And had the 200 not spun it wheels slightly it would have recorded 6.5. And the awd drive version will be even quicker. Sorry but the 200 won.
That was awesome , great job TFL ....
The Honda Accord V6 is so powerful that it makes the car faster than the Fusion even though the Fusion has more horsepower.
Uh………. No. Just no. The fusion sport and the Honda Accord aren’t even in the same class. The fusion blows it out of the water
@@csaleen302 i meant the ones in this video not the current ones
First comment nd tfl you guys are the best car reviewers this is the only place I come to see reviews of cars :)
For $32,000 I would take an Accord and then a Fusion.
***** I wish Mazda would offer a more potent powertrain with the 6, along with a better info/nav system. If Mazda fixed those two issues, it would be heads and tails above anything in the class, IMO.
Great review. Seriously I like the most bang for the buck. Ford Fusion is very nice but way to much money. Never liked Canary's. Honda is a bit pricey although holds it's re-sale value well and known for their dependability. Altima is so-so but I don't like the CV transmission. My choice would be the Chrysler 200 with the 3.6 Penestar. Plenty of power, decent ride and great price.
Fusion has a sport mode you know...! Lol
The Fusion is also AWD which lowers the MPGs.
I wonder what the FWD EcoBoost Fusion gets...
its 28 combined according to sticker.. but ive always gotten pretty close to the highway MPG all the time out of the fusion which I think is impressive at 36 for FWD and still 31 in an AWD vehicle.
9.12s on the 2.5L 4-cylinder Camry? That doesn't make sense at all to me.. I have posted an 8.0s average over 50+ runs in my 2015 2.5L XSE. Is the 2014 that different, or what?
RUclips Aneesh That's what I'm saying. Prob wasn't in sport mode.
RUclips Aneesh There is some shit going on. 12-14 i4 Camry's are rated at 7.9 in 0-60. I'm also the living proof by the way..., plus the way the audio was cut out in the Camry's testing- what a coincidence, & suspicious at the same time, heh. I'ts like they got paid to stf-up and help other cars sell...
Yeah I've actually heard something from a Toyota representative before while I was in a 15 le. I wasn't listening closely but he mentioned some part of the car's body being redesigned putting the 0-60 time down almost a full second
Deadpool you sound really mad. Are you?
Deadpool you're not in radiology because you can't even spell properly. Maybe next time you should watch the god damn video before you start calling people morons, you jackass.
I bought a new Chrysler 200C and have to say I quiet happy. 40K miles and absolutely no problems. i get 30 MPG with the v6 which rocks, but to be fair i do most of my driving on the highway. The interior is epic, still love it. The thing is great in the snow as well
200s :-).same miles from highway and it's heaven !!!
8years later what was your experience?
@@MichaelErnest666what was ur experience
@@camroon8450 To Much Money On Repairs 🤨🤔 She Was Good For The First 4/5 Years No Repairs Just Oil Change But Now Every 6 Months I'm Repairing Something Plus The Oil Change 🤯 My Next Car Will Be A Tesla 🙃 Hoping I'll Have One Around This Time Next Year 🤗
@@camroon8450 Comment Got Deleted Were You Able To See It 🤔🤨
Thanks Nissan for this amazing Altima, amazing room and it's so hard to get fuel tank empty...
Fluid design inside and out, 9 spd with a rotary knob, and built in North America ... The 200 hands down!
do they ever talk about how good the car is or just how fast it is?
Swap out the Altima for a Malibu. I don't like Ford personally but the Fusion is a pretty car. If I was going to buy a car for reliability and quality I would have to go with the Camry or the Malibu.
Had the fusion, went with the accord in the end. Wow what a great car the accord is. Super balanced, decent on gas and a pleasure to drive.
The Chrysler looks really nice
It's really weird hearing them include the 200 in the 'best selling' category when FCA is ceasing production on it either this year or next year.
I believe Chrysler said that to gain more sells, and it's working, I see 1 out of 10 cars are 200, wow, the take over is real
You could tell someone got Paid lol
Got the 300C Hemi and I love it. Getting the 200C V6 for the Wife.
I'm Japanese, but I like Detroit imported cars better.
really? Japanese cars are awesome.....the styling is a little different for American taste but the Toyotas and Hondas last foreeeeeeever.
The awd Fusion saps a lot of power, the reg fwd is much quicker. I have a Vbox and timed ours at 6.5 to 60 (good ol' sea level South FL lol). Have to say we drove all the cars in the class except for the new Mazda6, the Fusion was just the best overall, there's a solidness to it and fit finish that makes the Camry feel like a cheap tin can (same for Altima), and it rides way nicer and handles far better then the Camry (seriously that car was a pos, no wonder Toyota is rushing to update it after all the complaints online. My neighbor has only owned Camrys for like 20 years and thought everything else was crap, she went for a ride in our Fusion and blown away how much nicer all around the Fusion was. Accord was close, the V6 was quicker, but the Fusion was just so nice for the $, got the SE loaded. Accord was even missing the sporty character but it was the closest, Ford nailed the chassis and suspension on this car. Chrysler 200 don't care for so far, and odd that a new smaller, lighter car with a 9 speed auto basically gets the same mpg as the much larger and heavier 300 with an 8 speed auto and same V6.
The 200 is branded as a mid-size luxury sedan. Where's the Acura TLX? Where's the other mid size luxury sedans? Yes, the 200 is cheaper, but you get what you pay for.
Plus the TLX has awd, and a 9 speed auto. Come on Chrysler!
they are saying chrysler will be in the bottom everyman slot. doge - perfomance.
so basically chrysler is going to be the new plymouth. going against ford , chevy. not a premium brand.
from what i have read recently.
That's cute, you think the new 200 is a luxury sedan. So considering it's actually just a normal mass-produced mid-size sedan you're admitting it is better than the competition.
these are not luxury sedans
plus , they , fiat , is moving to the plymouth / dodge slot , like a for or a chevy
thats what i have read
dodge is supposed to be aimed at the performance type crap
and dont forget - the charger/challenge are still based on an older mercedes e class chassis , that was improved by the italians
Chrysler is Dodge's upscale brand, so why not use the other upscale brands, such as Acura, Infiniti, etc. Buying a 200 is like buying Walmart dress shoes, looks ok on the cheap, but much better alternatives.
I didn't expect the accord to haul ass like that I thought it would have been behind the Chrysler in 0-60 but wow!
I have a V6 2007 camry and that thing is quite fast for their class. It can cruise 100mph on Italian highways and 60mph on normal street daily. For a 7 yrs old car, have had 0 issue with it.
Alex Huynh nice! hp is just a number these days
They got paid to choose the "american" cars.
Exactly...Chrysler flew them out there,sort of a bias review.
penvon agreed.
2010V6RAV4
4 cyl compared to 6 cyl these reviews are worthless can't Blame Fiat with their reliability ratings they have to cheat somehow
If these guys are getting paid to favor the American brand then Consumer Reports is certainly getting paid to favor Toyota.
+Julio Romeresto The Chrysler 200 is VERY UNRELIABLE.You clearly have the Internet,go check it out yourself.
I drive an audi a4 but if I had to pick between any of these cars I would pick the fusion, it's just way sexy and iconic good looking car!! And the cryslers led lights looks amazing similar to the audi a8.
I wouldn't waste a second to choose which car to buy if it was my money.. CHRYSLER ALL THE WAY BABY!
yeeeeeeessssss
+Erine2Tru MOPAR OR NO CAR Lol
shut up bitch 😂😂
+Pumping Iron i wasn't talking, i typed it... Dumbass...
+Pumping Iron go bully someone else.. I don't have time for your shitty personality...
I like how they compare the $25k Camry and the $25k Altima and then decide that these 2 have the cheapest interiors.
The V6 Camry has the fastest 0-60 here.
Honda is way more reliable than chrysler.
maybe back in the days but not the new ones
My pick would be the car with the fewest maintenance items. I know the Honda V6 is a great car. I just wouldn't want to pay for a timing belt job though, or even do it myself for that matter.
Chrysler will never be on top of anything but the unreliable list. They've sucked for years. They think this 1 car speaks for the entire company as a whole. A few people have a problem with a Toyota and they assume it's junk. Lol. Chrysler builds one halfway decent car and suddenly Everyone thinks they're the best! Lol!! They've changed hands from the Germans to the Italians. Chrysler is horrible in so many ways.
Your name is 2010 v6 rav 4. LOL of coarse you will defend your toyota.
2010V6RAV4 . Chrysler is better then ford , and Toyota ! point bank.
Nathaniel Rudolph so in other words, RUclips is the Only thing you go to on the internet?? Lol. Read Consumer Reports, son. Chrysler is way worse. Oh, and Jeep Cherokee is on the not recommended list..sad..They're ranked horribly. They've been owned by Daimler, an independent group, the Nazis, and now Italians. They suck..simple. where do you get your information from? Toyota and Lexus are the most reliable in Consumer Reports. When I read your comment, I concluded that your just wishful.
i get my info from tfl car, cars.com and more.NO one listens to consumer reports. They pic on companies. read CNET on cars.
right !
i like the Chrysler because of the design its so luxury inside my type of style i jus cant wait to get one
Did u get one ?
I'll take the Accord very happily anytime ! Its just the best in its class.
+arrguitman booooring
+outspolsis booring is the hyundai accent you drive buddy
arrguitman I drive a dodge buddy, way more fun
David Lombana you know it is still licenced by Honda still right? where do you think the PROFIT from a HONDA goes? it does not stay in America. when you buy a car the Profit goes back to the Country of Origin. and Japan is where the Brand Honda is from. only a small portion of that car is left here in the US to pay the workers, but the remaining portion goes to the Manufactures country. you might wanna learn some shit, ser.
+Deadpool wow. I find your lack of information disturbing guy. Go google how much American Honda generates in revenue and employment directly/indirectly in Ohio alone. Although it has roots in Japan, American Honda is an American company. Sure money makes it back to the parent company. But what large corporation with overseas assets isn't receiving money from their subsidiaries? They are businesses...While you're at it stop typing in whatever phone or computer you're using to access RUclips. Chances are that you're lining the pockets of a Taiwanese electronics conglomerate right now. Wake up its the 21st century.
A little biased I must say. I mean anyone who has driven a 3.5 camry knows that those cars haul ass. I really wanna see my v6 camry go up against that Chrysler Honda and ford
That 9 speed transmission on Chrysler 200 is nothing but problems. Too bad though because that car looks descent!
Nope. ZF Friedichshafen designed the 9 speed and they make great transmissions.
I can get my chrysler 200s to 0-60 in 6 sec or less in sport mode and shift with paddles plus the 200s has nicer interior , mine is black on black with blue interior trim
I personally will have the Chrysler 200 over those cars
the epic fail gamer Can’t say that anymore...No more 200 for you lol
I think the interiors are personal preference. The Chrysler to me looks too much like a space ship inside, meanwhile the Accord and Camry are very simple and clean. Ford did a good job of combining a little bit of both.
$38k for the Fusion??
+violian5 - For a sucker looking at the best Titanium on the lot with custom paint and wheels maybe. Otherwise you should top out at about 32 for a Fusion.
that tech adds up
@@TheDaddynate Or wait two years and get it for 12k like I did. Great car, but not 38k great.
I bought the 2013 Honda Accord EX-L V6 with NAVIGATION.Very handsome looking car, excellent ride.
#1 - Honda Accord
Not a bad one, either. Chrysler is at the bottom in everything. Period.
pcuser1541 Not a bad list man. I'd switch the Camry and Accord around in V6 versions and back to the way you have it in the 2.5L 4-cylinder versions.
Some people get so emotionally invested into the company they drive and that inhibits them from thinking clearly. I drive a Toyota Camry (2015, XSE 2.5L) but I have no qualms admitting that the 2.5L Accord is a better engine.
I would put the Camry at the bottom of the list because it is butt ugly, outdated, cheaply finished, and extremely overpriced. Though the rest are all nice, second last would be the Altima thanks to the CVT.
Julio Romeresto based on the look then you right. But you'll wrong on everything else
Only Two of those offer AWD....
1:07 I thought the Chrysler 200 was a BMW X6 for a second, lol.
200 all day baby :-)
You guys are comparing cars with 4 cylinder , turbo 4 cylinder and V6 engines that vary greatly in price. How bout apples and apples? You guys choose a Chrysler and a Ford over a Camry? No way. Your bias shows in video after video.
Should have done the Camry SE V6, and it would have been a fair match.
for all you Honda haters... try my 04 accord 364 k miles and still runs like new.... still have my original exhaust, wheel bearings and many other ORIGINAL PARTS...!!!!!
awesome
Ford Fusion / Mondeo
This video is leaned towards Chrysler, noticed they used 2014 models to a 2015 model it's all sponsorships chysrlers paid him to make the Chrysler loom faster and better for marketing
That's just stupid. If the video was sponsored by Chrysler they wouldn't have let the one guy pick the Fusion for his favorite, and they wouldn't of shown a better 0-60 time for the Accord. I've been watching these guys videos for quite some time now, and I've never found them to be biased.
SHiBBY927
Yes they would. Crysler and Ford are both American Cars. The rest of them are Japenesse.
+Richard Emmanuel Chrysler and Ford are just as much competition to each other as any other brand. Your allegations are not supported by evidence.