Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

Fallon To EPA Administrator Regan: 'You Would Agree We Live In A Representative Republic, Correct?'

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 авг 2024
  • At a House Oversight Committee hearing on Wednesday, Rep. Pat Fallon (R-TX) questioned EPA Administrator Michael Regan about the authority of his administration.
    Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
    account.forbes...
    Stay Connected
    Forbes on Facebook: forbes
    Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
    Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
    More From Forbes: forbes.com

Комментарии • 263

  • @peterwookie7779
    @peterwookie7779 Месяц назад +66

    Social justice warrior. Find a new job

    • @M1N0rZ1rC0N
      @M1N0rZ1rC0N Месяц назад +1

      You misspelled communist

    • @hardhead5700
      @hardhead5700 Месяц назад

      How did those types of people become the Head of any agency in our government? They are not very bright

  • @marcjacoboii7425
    @marcjacoboii7425 Месяц назад +76

    Wow these people are ridiculous

  • @tonyv416
    @tonyv416 Месяц назад +50

    I’ll be glad to see this administration.. PACKING IT SHIT UP FOR GOOD

    • @rickrobbins1037
      @rickrobbins1037 Месяц назад +4

      Don't count on it until it's done. But I'm right there with you.

    • @WenBack
      @WenBack Месяц назад +1

      Stay vigilant!!!

    • @matthewmcdonald4222
      @matthewmcdonald4222 Месяц назад

      ​@@rickrobbins1037If you're right there with him, then don't count on it also.

  • @joehoncho8557
    @joehoncho8557 Месяц назад +9

    Get rid of this guy. He is despicable.

  • @-redacted_by_youtube
    @-redacted_by_youtube Месяц назад +27

    Rules are guidelines. Laws are explicit. I can break a rule and not get into trouble
    A law? Yeah thats illegal
    Very big difference.

    • @ComputerGeeks-R-Us
      @ComputerGeeks-R-Us Месяц назад

      When your money can be taken from you by force by bureaucratic "rules", similar to the force of law, then the lines are obviously blurred.

    • @M1N0rZ1rC0N
      @M1N0rZ1rC0N Месяц назад

      They warp the law to fit the rules to throw you in prison

  • @jerrycoronado6887
    @jerrycoronado6887 Месяц назад +35

    EPA has shown “balance” and “aggression” in administering the law? Hmmmm both concepts are mutually exclusive.

    • @astronautical1082
      @astronautical1082 Месяц назад +2

      Not when bad actors repeat offend as is so common.

    • @krisnaylor9488
      @krisnaylor9488 Месяц назад +2

      ​@@astronautical1082
      The EPA is a bad actor

    • @mykemorbius
      @mykemorbius Месяц назад +1

      No doubt. How can you aggressively balance a law?

  • @seanlee2650
    @seanlee2650 Месяц назад +21

    Tribunals are coming

    • @curve5746
      @curve5746 Месяц назад +5

      I truly hope so

  • @kicnbac
    @kicnbac Месяц назад +16

    He's going to give them the money. You watch.

    • @alexanderwhite298
      @alexanderwhite298 Месяц назад +1

      You should read the wiki on them.

    • @jong2359
      @jong2359 29 дней назад

      He already gave them money, it just hasn't been signed yet. He avoids using their name directly in EVERY one of his responses.

  • @mikehare2605
    @mikehare2605 Месяц назад +13

    This guy Reagan is just a smarmy punk. How can there be such a lack of adults in this administration? I know as a fact there are good, impressive and competent Democrats in this country.

  • @hemihead001
    @hemihead001 Месяц назад +12

    He believes in anything that promotes his power and his job . That's what he believes in most .

  • @Black71Eagle
    @Black71Eagle Месяц назад +8

    Chevron Deference is Gone ... Start Defunding Bureaucracies... make them Loby Groups and Not a Governmental power unto themselves

  • @barbarawaldorf330
    @barbarawaldorf330 Месяц назад +11

    Cut the budget.

  • @jasperkensington2644
    @jasperkensington2644 Месяц назад +7

    Another DEI hire; rebuild the EPA!

  • @rogertarbox8543
    @rogertarbox8543 Месяц назад +35

    This regan guy is a little wannabe dictator.

  • @chriscarsten4786
    @chriscarsten4786 Месяц назад +5

    Great job Pat!

  • @johnstoddard7324
    @johnstoddard7324 Месяц назад +34

    . DEFUND EPA

  • @stevemt3238
    @stevemt3238 Месяц назад +38

    Put the administrator in jail.

    • @whydoeknow3563
      @whydoeknow3563 Месяц назад

      @@stevemt3238 with felon45.

    • @almaadams3631
      @almaadams3631 Месяц назад

      ​@@whydoeknow3563Wake up, grow up, and think for yourself. It is OK to admit that you have been fooled by THE NEW WORLD ORDER.

  • @stevenwalker4923
    @stevenwalker4923 Месяц назад +12

    Using democratic principles are not the same as being a pure democracy. If we were in a pure democracy, nothing would get done.

    • @astronautical1082
      @astronautical1082 Месяц назад +2

      That does not normalize rule over the majority by a depraved minority.

    • @ComputerGeeks-R-Us
      @ComputerGeeks-R-Us Месяц назад

      If it were a pure democracy, then it would be mob rule and things would certainly get done. Would definitely suck if you were on the minority side of any issue, because you'd get steamrolled by the majority, "the mob", every time.

    • @seanlee2650
      @seanlee2650 Месяц назад +1

      We are a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC. I pledge allegiance to the flag of The United States of America. And to the REPUBLIC for which it stands. One nation under God. Indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Tribunals are coming.

    • @gailcarmack2954
      @gailcarmack2954 Месяц назад +1

      ​@@seanlee2650Yes we are. But our form of Government is a Democracy!!

    • @krisnaylor9488
      @krisnaylor9488 Месяц назад +3

      ​@@gailcarmack2954
      We use the democratic system of voting to pick out constitutional representatives.
      Being a Republic means NO mob rule.

  • @centerbuilder7677
    @centerbuilder7677 Месяц назад +19

    EPA sucks!

  • @okinawasurfspots3184
    @okinawasurfspots3184 Месяц назад +15

    This guy just doesn’t get it, another DEI appointment that proves this shit doesn’t work

    • @dotmarceo
      @dotmarceo Месяц назад +4

      So you're against clean air?

    • @willcox4561
      @willcox4561 Месяц назад +2

      @@dotmarceo NO. He is against idiocy.

    • @academicdeaneducation6671
      @academicdeaneducation6671 Месяц назад

      ​@@willcox4561Then why would he make such an idiotic comment? He couldn't tell you a single thing about Regan's qualifications. Before you look them up on Wikipedia, can you? Doubt it.

    • @elseby
      @elseby 24 дня назад +1

      Oh since you know obviously know more than this "DEI hire" why don't you go ahead and explain to us how he's wrong. Also tell us your state so we can have fun with your stance on the EPA.

    • @willcox4561
      @willcox4561 24 дня назад

      @@academicdeaneducation6671 You clearly need to do more homework. Start with the new regs in Iowa and then move on to Oregon and many other examples. Long established Amish farms are even being shutdown.

  • @SeanCuebas-zl5my
    @SeanCuebas-zl5my Месяц назад +23

    Another sugar britches who is unqualified. It never ends with this administration.

  • @michaelgray4601
    @michaelgray4601 Месяц назад +4

    Why does the EPA have $50 mil to give away?

    • @whydoeknow3563
      @whydoeknow3563 Месяц назад

      @@michaelgray4601 ask the house who gives your money away. no answer? ask your rep or senator.

  • @ArtGBralick
    @ArtGBralick Месяц назад +18

    The EPA, along with several other Departments of government, needs to be done completely absolved

    • @HillStreet7933
      @HillStreet7933 Месяц назад

      I agree... get that EPA BS off our diesel trucks to!

    • @JamesSmith-md1xn
      @JamesSmith-md1xn Месяц назад +1

      ​@HillStreet7933 you want your steam engine back

  • @bobdole-e4k
    @bobdole-e4k Месяц назад +1

    "Okay, so we're not getting an answer.." HAHAHA

  • @jonathankreusch9326
    @jonathankreusch9326 Месяц назад +2

    He acted as if he wasn’t aware and then tried to tell LB like he knew.

  • @michaelanderson4395
    @michaelanderson4395 Месяц назад +1

    The audacity of this guy is unbearable. His smug and dismissive attitude is unbelievable.

  • @kakarotprime69
    @kakarotprime69 Месяц назад +22

    The diversity hirres sure stand out

    • @krisnaylor9488
      @krisnaylor9488 Месяц назад +2

      And if you notice they cry misogyny, racism or some other ism, ist, or phobe whenever ridiculous ideas or actions are criticized.
      That's the whole playbook rule 1 right there.

    • @thataintit2133
      @thataintit2133 Месяц назад +5

      what facts can you provide that prove he is a diversity hire?? Remember facts over feelings and it seems like you are in your feelings.

    • @whydoeknow3563
      @whydoeknow3563 Месяц назад +1

      like tim, byron, ben and kash?

    • @elseby
      @elseby 24 дня назад +2

      Don't act like you're smart.

  • @CountryFenderBass
    @CountryFenderBass Месяц назад +4

    Don’t ask him those hard questions

  • @samstelly8815
    @samstelly8815 Месяц назад +6

    On CJA website the first thing listed is free Palestine.
    Word salad:
    We are building local alternatives that center traditional ecological and cultural knowledge and create a pathway for a regenerative future.

    • @gailcarmack2954
      @gailcarmack2954 Месяц назад

      Deregulating is why Palestine happened.

    • @deborahplasencia1833
      @deborahplasencia1833 Месяц назад

      that is a LIE....there is NO reference to palastine.......did you even look at the website? the statement you refer to is NOT word salad, it is a carefully designed statement to put forth the direction of the EPA. you do know that the EPA regulates water safety (local control over Flint water caused devastating impacts on citizens although read the history of how almost immediately the auto factory switched back because the new water source was so contaminated it was corroding the engines), how breaks in oil pipelines are destroying land and how the run off from nitrates in the midwest into our streams and rivers is KILLING off living beings.....be careful what fish you eat because they can be contaminated with chemicals.......learn and educate before jumping on the republican bandwagon of monetary gain over safety and protection.

    • @samstelly8815
      @samstelly8815 Месяц назад

      @@deborahplasencia1833 yes I did, you dolt.

    • @deborahplasencia1833
      @deborahplasencia1833 Месяц назад

      @@samstelly8815 no 'palastine' listed on the website.

  • @onewaveview
    @onewaveview Месяц назад +1

    Wow, just wow

  • @2yearsapart678
    @2yearsapart678 Месяц назад +1

    This EPA administrator is terrible.

  • @nedsackmann2215
    @nedsackmann2215 Месяц назад +4

    The one mistake President Nixon made was starting the EPA.

    • @robertewalt7789
      @robertewalt7789 Месяц назад +1

      He made some others, but EPA was a bad one.

    • @whydoeknow3563
      @whydoeknow3563 Месяц назад

      he did what the 50-states were begging for.

  • @alonzobean1
    @alonzobean1 Месяц назад +1

    Abolish the EPA.

  • @naturalonenaturalone8996
    @naturalonenaturalone8996 Месяц назад +1

    Disban the EPA.

  • @northupupgrages09
    @northupupgrages09 Месяц назад +1

    The fact that this organization is being CONSIDERED for 50 million dollars is abhorrent!!!

  • @davidramrut5002
    @davidramrut5002 Месяц назад +17

    DEI hire!

    • @Lucas-hb1uq
      @Lucas-hb1uq Месяц назад +4

      DEI to racists is whenever a black person has a job.

    • @Lucas-hb1uq
      @Lucas-hb1uq Месяц назад +1

      @@DIRTYdeeds613 Donalds is the purest example of a DEI hire for the Republican Party. The good thing about DEI is that it’s not about qualifications, just a method to consider when there are clearly equal candidates. You don’t think the republican party were tripping over themselves to promote Byron?

    • @Lucas-hb1uq
      @Lucas-hb1uq Месяц назад

      @@DIRTYdeeds613 Exactly

    • @dotmarceo
      @dotmarceo Месяц назад +3

      10x smarter than you, though.

    • @whydoeknow3563
      @whydoeknow3563 Месяц назад

      @@DIRTYdeeds613 agree, foolish people voted for byeron and an intelligent person appointed michael. it is what it.

  • @samuelfink4799
    @samuelfink4799 Месяц назад +21

    There has to be one qualified black person in this administration even though I haven’t seen one yet.

    • @dotmarceo
      @dotmarceo Месяц назад +1

      Interesting.

    • @kingjamesgorden3
      @kingjamesgorden3 Месяц назад

      Sec/Labor-never owned a business
      Sec/Trans-“Pothole Pete”
      Sec/Interior-never owned land
      Sec/Energy-never worked in energy
      Sec/VA-admitted TODAY that it would NOT follow the Restoration Act, and instead follow guidance from DOJ/Executive Branch.
      Sec/DHS-A Cuban who told Cubans “do not come here. There is nothing for you here!”
      Sec/Land Management-an eco warrior that sold out her friends to avoid prison.
      These people are not chosen for their qualifications, they are chosen for their ideology.
      This guy here Regan’s only “meaningful” contribution in over 15 years of working government (his only job, no civilian experience) is creating a “climate justice” board.
      Incompetence abounds in this admin, and it begins with a man who can barely stand and has somehow built a fortune while never working outside of government. Not as a truck driver, not as a lifeguard. Not as a miner. Not in the top of his class. Not with 3 degrees. Not when he was or wasn’t (depending on the speech he gave, he goes back and forth) marching in the 70’s, and not when he “never spoke to his son about business”. When your leader is a liar, a cheat, and has flip flopped his way through decades of “service”, these are the people you get underneath him.

    • @The_Rob_D
      @The_Rob_D Месяц назад +2

      @@dotmarceoIt’s not interesting, it’s blatant affirmative action. These people were picked based on their race, not their qualifications. You want to see well accomplished, respected black men? Look at Clarence Thomas, Tim Scott, Ben Carson or Thomas Sowell for starters. Then you’ll realize the OP was right.

    • @whydoeknow3563
      @whydoeknow3563 Месяц назад

      put your glasses back on.

  • @intpandemic7779
    @intpandemic7779 Месяц назад +2

    Congress doesn't have the capacity to create a law for every detail and situation. So they write a law such as "Companies can't dump their waste in the river" and so the epa makes rules to manage the details, to define what constitutes waste, to determine the appropriate way to handle waste, safe places to dump, etc. And until now those details have been written based on the input of people who actually study the environment, but now they will be decided by judges who are NOT subject matter experts.

  • @jong2359
    @jong2359 29 дней назад +1

    This EPA Commissioner guy - whoever he is - is GREASY like a used car salesman.

  • @gregm5636
    @gregm5636 Месяц назад +3

    dragged that kicking and screaming, and finally at the end said..... to not get that grant...... He could have just said that in the beginning.

  • @shane3878
    @shane3878 Месяц назад +3

    Note he didn't anything about an organization being violent or supporting terrorism.

  • @RHEMALIFE007
    @RHEMALIFE007 Месяц назад +1

    #EPAGUY NEEDS REMOVED NOW

  • @joehoncho8557
    @joehoncho8557 Месяц назад +2

    Definitely a DEI hire….. and activist.

  • @The_Rob_D
    @The_Rob_D Месяц назад +7

    Dismantle ALL 3 letter agencies and start from scratch.

  • @UkanSucklemuhcock
    @UkanSucklemuhcock Месяц назад +10

    Energy expert from TX? Didn't all their stuff freeze up a few years ago?😂

    • @UpYourArsenal
      @UpYourArsenal Месяц назад +1

      The only state in the nation with a truly independent energy grid, had a freak storm.
      You're not making a meaningful point making fun of a state who doesn't need your cluelessness for it to exist.

    • @gailcarmack2954
      @gailcarmack2954 Месяц назад +2

      ​@@UpYourArsenalBut when it all goes to shit. It's the Federal Government that gets called. Just like all the other States.

    • @UpYourArsenal
      @UpYourArsenal Месяц назад

      @@gailcarmack2954 I'd like to think it makes more sense to let Texas have their own power grid, and the Fed give them $60m to reinforce it for cold weather -- than to let the federal government give a cumulative $1Billion promoting tourism to countries that aren't ours, 'gender equality' in the most sexist nations on the planet, or giving grants to colleges to research the effects of giving vodka to fish.

    • @gailcarmack2954
      @gailcarmack2954 Месяц назад +1

      @@UpYourArsenal Pretty sure we have already. Given them money for their infrastructure. To spend however they want. You do know studies of those various things. Come from different people in Congress. Which I highly doubt there is a vodka to fish study. But it was funny. Now the other. I highly doubt it. unless what we get in return. Is more valuable.

    • @UpYourArsenal
      @UpYourArsenal Месяц назад

      @@gailcarmack2954 Look it up -- $100,000 in 1975. For this to be what of the most 'absurd' examples, think of all the money they spend on something that might actually have meaning in the world?
      Instead of simply 'doubting' what I say because you don't want to believe me -- look it up, learn for yourself.

  • @beautifully_scarred_lea
    @beautifully_scarred_lea Месяц назад +2

    Balance and aggressive dont go together

  • @georgemusgrave4304
    @georgemusgrave4304 Месяц назад +1

    Equity on display

  • @LindsayRichards
    @LindsayRichards Месяц назад +6

    He is a fool that can't even understand the questions.

    • @dotmarceo
      @dotmarceo Месяц назад +3

      Bs questions.

    • @gailcarmack2954
      @gailcarmack2954 Месяц назад +3

      Because people that don't understand how it works. Are asking a lot of silly questions.

    • @Andre-qo5ek
      @Andre-qo5ek Месяц назад +1

      no.. he understands the questions... the questions are just garbage.

  • @danielgrantcoleman
    @danielgrantcoleman Месяц назад +4

    What is the EPA’s position on the chem trails that are public knowledge btw. That change weather?

    • @intpandemic7779
      @intpandemic7779 Месяц назад +1

      There is a difference between cloud seeding (which is real) and chem trails (which is not).

    • @danielgrantcoleman
      @danielgrantcoleman Месяц назад

      @@intpandemic7779 what chemicals do they use? Are they good for humans? Life in general? And how else do they do it besides “chem” trails???

    • @backalleyburrito1815
      @backalleyburrito1815 Месяц назад

      ​​@@intpandemic7779negative. Both are the same, cloud seeding is just a more described action. Also chem trails are very much real and public knowledge. Shit even your car leaves chem trails.

  • @user-ib1hi1mg2j
    @user-ib1hi1mg2j Месяц назад

    Fallon give it up!!!

  • @michaeldeas1969
    @michaeldeas1969 Месяц назад +22

    Cut off all funding for the EPA, ATF, IRS, DOE, CIA, FBI, and the Federal Reserve!!!

    • @dotmarceo
      @dotmarceo Месяц назад +6

      You want a lawless society? That sounds criminal.

    • @nathanthompson3401
      @nathanthompson3401 Месяц назад

      @@dotmarceo you over react sir. There is nothing lawful about unelected administrators creating rules that DO NOT have the standing of law. However, violate a rule and a group of Jack booted, armor wearing, armed thugs will visit you at 0500 and ransack your home and terrorize your family. That may also include killing your pets or releasing them into the neighborhood. There is a huge difference between rule makers and laws. The leading comment said nothing with police or other LE or security enforcement. Only those that have proven to operate within the “rules” that change as frequently as the President or Secretary.

    • @danstory4286
      @danstory4286 Месяц назад

      ​@@dotmarceoHalf of these agencies shouldn't even exist and none of them should be armed.

    • @danielgrantcoleman
      @danielgrantcoleman Месяц назад +1

      @@dotmarceoi would like to see a society that has laws. We have laws yes? But the rules. The crazy rules that congress have not approved. Are unconstitutional. Btw. You want to see lawless? Look at most democrat run cities. You have no dog in this fight

    • @kurtbrisch5776
      @kurtbrisch5776 Месяц назад +2

      sounds like you want to consume toxic waste with your morning cereal, please enjoy.

  • @4NINETYSIX
    @4NINETYSIX Месяц назад +2

    They should require him to watch Driving Miss Daisy . Show them how to act in front of people .

  • @CSGATI
    @CSGATI Месяц назад

    This guy does not want to lose any of his power or funding.

  • @critter9a
    @critter9a Месяц назад +14

    defund EPA,DEA,FBI,ATF, IRS,DHS,

    • @whydoeknow3563
      @whydoeknow3563 Месяц назад

      please do. the us needs millions unemployed and unable to feed their families.

    • @ellenhulslander2897
      @ellenhulslander2897 Месяц назад

      ​@@whydoeknow3563, sucking at the government teat either way.🥴

    • @whydoeknow3563
      @whydoeknow3563 Месяц назад

      @@ellenhulslander2897 won't be any government for long with no tax money, no clean air, no clean water and no one to stop any violence or harm to the citizens in all 50-states. 🤷‍♀️

    • @whydoeknow3563
      @whydoeknow3563 Месяц назад

      @@ellenhulslander2897 no tax money, no clean air, no clean water, no one to stop people from hurting each other. no government.

    • @jong2359
      @jong2359 29 дней назад

      @@whydoeknow3563 The Federal government is not the soul source of clean air, water, or safety - in fact... it is the LAST source I would want those things to come from.

  • @steveinoz8188
    @steveinoz8188 Месяц назад +3

    Does the RNC have rules?

    • @wash5934
      @wash5934 Месяц назад +2

      None that are illegally treated and prosecuted like they are laws.

  • @TheyCameForMe
    @TheyCameForMe Месяц назад

    ✊🏿 TEAM USA 🫡🤝🇺🇸 #StrongerTogether ✊

  • @monacallender721
    @monacallender721 Месяц назад

    Get Trump back in.

  • @gramslam-nk6tx
    @gramslam-nk6tx Месяц назад

    Regan is such a smart ass

  • @bartywilkerson6333
    @bartywilkerson6333 Месяц назад

    They were scheduled to receive!! So let's hear some more political double talk!!!!😂😂😂

  • @user-je3xk3ym7c
    @user-je3xk3ym7c Месяц назад +1

    He's supposed to be an "expert"? 🤣

  • @user-wp2kc8vd5y
    @user-wp2kc8vd5y Месяц назад +1

    They'll get the money!

  • @gailcarmack2954
    @gailcarmack2954 Месяц назад +1

    I think he gave the right answer. He agreed with the law maker. Whats wrong with that.

  • @Drakior
    @Drakior Месяц назад

    EPA guy all in all not to bad compared to the others who usually outright refuse to answer. Not bad.

  • @richknudsen5781
    @richknudsen5781 Месяц назад

    The ultimate DEI vhire right there everybody.
    Step and fetch it Regan.

  • @timothynaquin8899
    @timothynaquin8899 Месяц назад

    This guy is one slick snake

  • @David-vt3zn
    @David-vt3zn Месяц назад

    He sounds just like my ex wife.... I got rid of her too

  • @micheleconley5714
    @micheleconley5714 Месяц назад

    Mr. EPA is a jerk and likes the money he makes and the power he throws around. Not a good combination.

  • @Black71Eagle
    @Black71Eagle Месяц назад +1

    He avoided stating they would not get any gov tax payers dollars.... which means they will if not stopped

  • @user-sx3ov5nv8b
    @user-sx3ov5nv8b Месяц назад

    1. 2 trillion dollars in regulatory costs? Let's assume that number is correct. If Congress tells the EPA to clean up the environment (in some general way), then the EPA may well end up imposing such costs in order to clean up the environment. If the costs are unreasonable, it may be because Congress misdirected the EPA, telling it to do something it shouldn't. No one ever thinks of that.

  • @thereissomecoolstuff
    @thereissomecoolstuff Месяц назад

    This guy is an awesome filibusterer. The EPA is an incredibly destructive machine.

  • @ruelethefirst3002
    @ruelethefirst3002 Месяц назад

    NO THE EPA IS NOT IN ANYWAYS ASSIGNED HEALTH LMAO... GET THESE PEOPLE OUT .... SADNESS

  • @Rick-ux5ku
    @Rick-ux5ku Месяц назад

    Reagon still says yet.
    😢

  • @kennethfarthing1474
    @kennethfarthing1474 Месяц назад +1

    I know AIPAC has representation
    The American people
    Not so much

  • @user-qh7ws1te3c
    @user-qh7ws1te3c Месяц назад

    Congress wrote the law that enacted the epa to protect the environment and health . Let’s not forget that the fossil fuel industry receives $8,000,000 a minute in subsidies.

  • @victorforzani3433
    @victorforzani3433 Месяц назад

    sound like they should not received 50 million dollar in their budget.

  • @Alacarte0421
    @Alacarte0421 Месяц назад

    Yet again another example of a DEI hire who is clueless.

  • @DestructZero
    @DestructZero Месяц назад

    The EPA could be abolished tomorrow.

  • @robertmize327
    @robertmize327 Месяц назад

    Didn't
    Earn
    It

    • @whydoeknow3563
      @whydoeknow3563 Месяц назад

      @@robertmize327 agree, michael didn't earn his degrees from tump university.

  • @huckleberryhound4407
    @huckleberryhound4407 Месяц назад +1

    Reagan is wrong, EPA has nothing to do with public health, that’s the purview of the CDC.

    • @Andre-qo5ek
      @Andre-qo5ek Месяц назад

      um.. the environment has nothing to do with health?
      soo.. pollution.... who takes care of that... the CDC or the EPA?
      or do we just trust the free market capitalists to a handshake agreement not to pollute?
      the answer is the EPA...

  • @nicholasb8799
    @nicholasb8799 Месяц назад

    He is just taking his DEI reparations.....

  • @fraa888grindr6
    @fraa888grindr6 Месяц назад

    Hahahahaha! This cat is a master at avoidance of answering questions in sworn testimony, under oath.
    All these expenditures are massively affecting our economy via inflation and simultaneously reducing GDP.

  • @ericrotsinger9729
    @ericrotsinger9729 Месяц назад +3

    Wow Regan is the affect of affirmative action.

    • @dotmarceo
      @dotmarceo Месяц назад +2

      Smarter than you.

  • @1001Hobbies
    @1001Hobbies 17 дней назад

    The various "departments" make rules which have the same weight and penalties of LAWS. Only Congress can make laws. These departments were formed to enforce THOSE laws, not make new laws, if if they spell those laws R-U-L-E.

  • @intpandemic7779
    @intpandemic7779 Месяц назад

    I love how the same people yelling that they aren't racist are in this chat talking about how this guy is obviously a DEI hire. You people are ignorant to your own evil.

  • @user-sx3ov5nv8b
    @user-sx3ov5nv8b Месяц назад

    The 1.2 trillion dollars in regulatory costs may be over a 10 year period or some other such thing. Anti-regulation lawmakers love to play with such numbers. But what they really love to do is calculate the economic costs of regulating while excluding the economic benefits of regulating, which are, admittedly, harder to quantify, but are just as real. If a formerly polluted lake becomes swimmable and fishable thanks to EPA regs, that provides a boost to the local economy. Multiply that by the number of such formerly polluted lakes nationwide. Don't pretend otherwise. Same with cleaner air leading to less fewer lung diseases. Same with fewer carcinogens in the environment, thanks to EPA regs. Throw in the economic effects of these changes, if you want a true cost accounting.

  • @JayNuffer-wo5yl
    @JayNuffer-wo5yl Месяц назад

    Epa needs to go bye bye forever.. what do they need guns for again

  • @scottekoontz
    @scottekoontz Месяц назад +3

    The far right never gives up on their cherry picks. Yes, rules ARE designed under auspices of laws, and it is impossible to have government micro-manage by convening to make all rules.
    For example, there simply is no time or expertise for Reps to meet to determine the amount of lead in water. Can you imagine tasking a far rightist who owns a polluting businesses to help determine EPA rules?

    • @heystarfish100
      @heystarfish100 Месяц назад

      That power belongs to the States and not some unelected Federal Government bureaucrat with radical ideologies that cost us trillions of dollars and do nothing beneficial.

  • @redsammy7789
    @redsammy7789 Месяц назад +1

    DEI promotion

  • @79PoisonBreaker
    @79PoisonBreaker Месяц назад

    if you like clean water and clean air it costs more then dirty water and air. the environment needs protection from the greedy for all to prosper.

  • @RusShiro
    @RusShiro Месяц назад

    why are politicians so stuck on hypotheticals and "gothca" moments

  • @jeffkline976
    @jeffkline976 Месяц назад +1

    this is problem bureaucrats think they make laws and enforce them. Enough defund these clowns

    • @intpandemic7779
      @intpandemic7779 Месяц назад +1

      Congress makes the laws, the executive branch enforces them, the EPA is a function of the executive branch. Their rules are designed to enforce the laws since the laws will be vague like "companies can't dump waste in the rivers" so it's the EPA's job to rule on all the different details such as what constitutes waste, where IS a safe place to dump waste, etc. Congress doesn't have the capacity to rule on every specific detail needed to enforce their own laws.

  • @WenBack
    @WenBack Месяц назад

    In December the EPA awarded $50 million to Climate Justice Alliance, a network of nearly 90 affiliates, which plans to use the money to “resource community-based organizations (CBOs) to address past, current, and future environmental health and justice challenges.”May 23, 2024

  • @JuanMarco45
    @JuanMarco45 Месяц назад

    DEI director. There seems to be quite a few of these showing up at these hearings.

  • @bartwilliams4478
    @bartwilliams4478 Месяц назад

    EPA was never designed or created to regulate CO2, a effectively non toxic gas just as Nitrogen is not regulated

  • @ValidatingUsername
    @ValidatingUsername Месяц назад

    Heres the problem, if trump got into office again and started an enforcement agency on an executive order for like the space force or something barring any hobby launches or drones and let the agency come up with their own rules bypassing congress all together…

  • @barryschwarz
    @barryschwarz Месяц назад

    Thank you Forbes for showing how ridiculous these Republican congresscritters are. Most of them are not so stupid that they really don't know how congress-ratified agencies implement the laws, but boy do they love do give that impression while they grandstand on their talking points.

  • @greghunter5627
    @greghunter5627 Месяц назад

    DEA hired through DEI.

  • @xeriscapeguy
    @xeriscapeguy Месяц назад

    EPA has authority under the law to establish regulation. Additionally, I dont think a football bro with a degree in degree in government and international relations to is an expert in enviomental protection.

  • @frankofam1069
    @frankofam1069 29 дней назад

    4:21
    😂😂😂

  • @chriscahill1005
    @chriscahill1005 Месяц назад

    You are the EPA ifit doesn’t have to do with the dirt the birds or the fish you don’t fund it