This was truly incredible! I'm from the Netherlands, it truly is sad to find lots parishes empty, or the average age being 70+. That said, I'm happy to have found a good parish that is more lively!
To go from zero base pairs in our DNA to about 3.5 Billion, means we should be adding a new base pair each and every year (with no mistakes or repeats as it does so), and a new abillity or limb every decade or so. Instead we see stagnation. Evilution simply cannot be the operating principle behind our current condition.
More evidence for a de-evolution if anything. Also how does nature organize itself into the quaternary (base 4 - exponentially more complex than the binary system of digital code) code of DNA that operates in all life resulting in immense repeatable complexity and variation? If our radio telescopes received a digital code from the center of the universe would scientists immediately exclaim that it somehow evolved over the time it took to receive or would they not say it must be intelligent design?
@@StudentDad-mc3pu Please teach us o wiseman. Why leave us in our ignorance? Perhaps you can explain to us what the best evolutionists in the world have failed to do.
Before I found the Kolbe center I went through a lot of this material watching Kent Hovind and his landmark series 'Lies in the Textbooks'. Although Kent is very anti-catholic if you overlook that and listen to his talks they are very much on point. One of the things Kent points out is how this whole idea of evolution is not found just in biology but in all the main sciences. It is just adapted and fitted to whatever narrative they want to spin. So in astonomy you will find the evolution of the material universe from the Big Bang, just as you find the evolution of life from the Cambrian Explosion. You can see the theme running through just about everything. In some ways I think this whole 'evolution theory' may be the great delusion of the end-times.
@@39knights Yes, I've known for years you can't get published in any scientific discipline unless you concoct how your observations and conclusions (in whatever field) relates to evolution. 🤨
@@39knights CS Lewis writes about “The Funeral of the Great Myth”. More from a philosophical point of view, but I would get into discussions with “traditional Catholics” and they call creationism “allegorical”. Trying to scientifically explains things, but that’s where true Faith comes into play.
To add information where it did not exist previously would be an act of creation. To add complexity to a system that did not already possess this complexity would be an act of creation. Aquinas shows that such an act is an act of God. It would seem that systems that exist both corporeally and spiritually would not gain new information on their own, as by natural processes, this not being in the nature of created things. We see this to be the case with DNA and even bacterial culture experiments where “new abilities” are adaptations to the environment not by genetic gains but losses. This seems obvious now, evolution is a fantasy.
Such a relief to finally see more Catholics on board with Creationism on RUclips. Praise God.
For me when I still was Protestant it was a big hurdle thinking that Catholicism was OK with evolution and an Old Earth.
@@sotem3608 I had a similar experience. Looks like we're finally growing a backbone again 😇
Twice decieved!
This was truly incredible!
I'm from the Netherlands, it truly is sad to find lots parishes empty, or the average age being 70+.
That said, I'm happy to have found a good parish that is more lively!
Keep insisting on truth ❤
To go from zero base pairs in our DNA to about 3.5 Billion, means we should be adding a new base pair each and every year (with no mistakes or repeats as it does so), and a new abillity or limb every decade or so. Instead we see stagnation. Evilution simply cannot be the operating principle behind our current condition.
More evidence for a de-evolution if anything. Also how does nature organize itself into the quaternary (base 4 - exponentially more complex than the binary system of digital code) code of DNA that operates in all life resulting in immense repeatable complexity and variation? If our radio telescopes received a digital code from the center of the universe would scientists immediately exclaim that it somehow evolved over the time it took to receive or would they not say it must be intelligent design?
AMEN!
It’s mathematically impossible
Neither of your assertions is true.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu Please teach us o wiseman. Why leave us in our ignorance? Perhaps you can explain to us what the best evolutionists in the world have failed to do.
Excellent - thank you 🔥👏😎. God bless 🙏⛪⚓👑.
LOL I never knew to explain the Big Bang, they have to introduce 20 times as much unknown material as are already observed
Before I found the Kolbe center I went through a lot of this material watching Kent Hovind and his landmark series 'Lies in the Textbooks'. Although Kent is very anti-catholic if you overlook that and listen to his talks they are very much on point. One of the things Kent points out is how this whole idea of evolution is not found just in biology but in all the main sciences. It is just adapted and fitted to whatever narrative they want to spin. So in astonomy you will find the evolution of the material universe from the Big Bang, just as you find the evolution of life from the Cambrian Explosion. You can see the theme running through just about everything. In some ways I think this whole 'evolution theory' may be the great delusion of the end-times.
@@39knights Yes, I've known for years you can't get published in any scientific discipline unless you concoct how your observations and conclusions (in whatever field) relates to evolution. 🤨
@@39knights CS Lewis writes about “The Funeral of the Great Myth”. More from a philosophical point of view, but I would get into discussions with “traditional Catholics” and they call creationism “allegorical”. Trying to scientifically explains things, but that’s where true Faith comes into play.
❤ Truth. Wonderful 🥰
To add information where it did not exist previously would be an act of creation. To add complexity to a system that did not already possess this complexity would be an act of creation.
Aquinas shows that such an act is an act of God.
It would seem that systems that exist both corporeally and spiritually would not gain new information on their own, as by natural processes, this not being in the nature of created things. We see this to be the case with DNA and even bacterial culture experiments where “new abilities” are adaptations to the environment not by genetic gains but losses.
This seems obvious now, evolution is a fantasy.
I'm sorry but it's very difficult to understand what he's saying because his accent and there is intimidating constantly happening in the broadcast