Desh Deshantar : लोकसभा और विधानसभा चुनाव एक साथ कराने की सार्थकता
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 ноя 2024
- Guest - S.Y. Quraishi, Former Chief Election Commissioner, Rahul Dev, Senior Journalist, Subhash C. Kashyap, Constitutional Expert/ Former Secretary-General, Lok Sabha
Anchor: Qurban Ali
Kashyap ji ! You are right
Thank u rajya sabha....all other news channels must educate themselves on how debate is conducted
indeed they even don't know how to talk...
Subhas kashyap sir is just brilliant.
Tq subhash sir
Very gud debate .. u can't find such panelist on other news channels
एक साथ से अच्छा है दो बार चुनाव कराए जाएं।पहले लोकसभा चुनाव फिर ढाई साल बाद विधानसभा के चुनाव कराए जाएं ।
Awesome debate.....
Tnx rjsb
I agree with subhash sir
Concept of "Shadow Cabinet" can also be considered so that new government formation can be done easily in case constructive vote of no-confidence is passed. This will also ensure greater accountability from the government as govt policies will be closely followed by respective Shadow ministers from opposition.
shadow cabinet works only for a two party system, its infeasible to adopt such a practice in india where many a times we don't even have a recognized opposition (as is the case at present)
Excellent debate
har ek field me bharatiya saath saath hai tho election chalane me kyo nahi???? universal election...idea achha hai..jaari karna imp hai... ek festival jo log samjate hai unake liye bhi yaha step ek political conscious. jaroor layega...badhe BHARAT.
Election simultaneously is a huge task. If India can do it, it will be an achievement however difficult. I would say, let's go for it!
Vishnu Mahant well said Sir please watch my video on RUclips NMF news titled Desh me yaise Ho sakate hai eak sath sabhi chunav photo titled MODIJI YEH SUZAV MAN LO Support for Election Reforms Jai Hind DHANYAWAD
जरूर कर सकते सहाब
Bhaskar Bhusari Thanks for reply watch my video and forward to all your friends and relatives DHANYAWAD and Support Election Reforms
Vishnu Mahant
Please watch my video on following link Support for Election Reforms Jai Hind DHANYAWAD
Vishnu Mahant
Very nice sir please continue
Subhash kashyap ..Indian polity book
sir I think , term should be for 4 years not 5 year. it will make India a strong democracy.
Fixed terms तो होनाही होगा . राज्य के गव्हर्नर का चुनाव भी electoral college से ही होना चाहीये ता की गव्हर्नर को केंद्र का हस्तक नही समझा जायेगा ! जैसे कश्यप साहब केहते है conditional no confidence motion अगर नया नेता चुनने में असफल रहा तो राष्ट्रपती या गव्हर्नर सरकार चलाईनगे।।।
Bhaskar Bhusari Good Views Sir please watch my video on RUclips NMF news titled Desh me yaise Ho sakate hai eak sath sabhi chunav photo titled MODIJI YEH SUZAV MAN LO Support for Election Reforms Jai Hind DHANYAWAD
अगर लोकसभा एवं विधानसभा के चुनाव एक साथ कराए जाते हैं अगर बीच में विधानसभा भंग हो जाती है तो अगले बचे हुए कार्यकाल के लिए मध्यावधी चुनाव कराए जा सकते हैं ऐसा लोकसभा के साथ भी हो सकता है
jaise bhi ho bhaiyo...vvpat k sath hone chahiye....
aise kaise ho sakta h mujhe nai lagta h
or Vidhanshava bhang v hoga to koi ek State k hoga Sara State k ek sath thori n bhang hoga
भारत में विधानसभा और लोकसभा के चुनाव एक साथ होंगे अगर बीच मैं अगर कोई व्यवधान या संवैधानिक संकट जब आता है तब उस स्थिति में एक रास्ता मध्य अवधि चुनाव होना चाहिए जिससे विधानसभा आगे बचा हुआ कार्यकाल पूरा कर सके
Indeed
Loksava or Rajsava k chunav ek sath hoga h to, keya Jammu or Kashmir me v chunav sath hoga ??
Why anchor is interrupting to Mr subhash kashyap...given more time
To constitution expert.
I will object here in debate,
no one has taken view about voters mandate...
voters will be influenced and manipulated easily by majority party in central.
this will affect d soul of democracy
nivedita i agree with your point !
if central party can influence them, but is this point is valid than they also can influence in state and muncipality election too.
If there is any attempt to influence elections by ruling party that can even happen when elections are conducted separately. It's not relevant only to the matter of conducting simultaneous elections.
nivedita I think voters will be more independent because all parties will be on same floor
Awesome
Subhas kashyap is excellent and has an valid point and IQ as well ,other panelists are far below from him in terms of knowledge and understanding.
A B ya bro I have that book but I used to prefer lamikant because laxmikat is quite easy and systematic , by the way I was against one nation one election but he gave me a rational point to support this move.
Subhash Kashyap ji sahi bol rahe hai.... inko nahi samajh rahe hai.....
excellent debate
One more point which needs to be addressed: what if ruling party itself dissolves house for snap polls in the quest to secure absolute majority as currently happening in Japan. This issue needs to be addressed apart from constructive no confidence.
Suresh Raut did u have IR as optional sub.in mains ??
Mukesh Patidar no.. mine is chemistry
Suresh Raut do u have chemistry background
The only solution is fixed term for loksabha and state assemblies ! As Kashyap sahab said leader of house to be elected only in House itself and no confidence motion has to be admitted only if the opposition party has enough strength to form the alternative government ! If house fails to elect leader Governor rule till the term of assembly is over
nice talk
Thanks
Subhash Kashyap couldn't understand the point Rahul Dev was raising. Suppose party A is in power and is corrupt so the opposition will bring no confidence motion to change the ruling party not the CM/PM.
देश में एक साथ सभी चुनाव होने चाहिए। इससे फायदे-
1- देश/ सरकार का या जनता का पैसा बचेगा ।
2- जनता का बार बार वोट डालने का झंझट और समय बचेगा जिससे वह अपने खुद के काम करेगा ।
3- सभी राजनीतिक दलों का समय और प्रचार का पैसा बचेगा ।
4- ड्यूटी करने वाले सभी कर्मचारियो का समय बचेगा जिससे वह अपने विभाग में अधिक समय दे सकेंगे।
5- देश में स्थिरता होगी जिससे विकास के कार्यो में बाधा नहीं होगी।
जो राजनीति दल इसके लिए तैयार नहीं होता हैं तो उसकी मान्यता रद्द होनी चाहिए। हम भारतीय जनता को चाहिए कि एक देश एक चुनाव के लिए जनहित याचिका दायर करनी चाहिए क्यो कि हर 2-4 महीने बाद चुनाव चुनाव का झंझट झेलना पड़ता है जिससे उसके अपने खुद के काम में बाधा उत्पन्न होती है।
Agar kisi state me agar sarkaar nahi bn pati h to phir se election pr every election ka date fix ho jaise 2019 me election h to agla 2024 me hi hoga..
Chahe state ya centre ka 2 saal hi hua ho.. lambe samay me pakka election km hoga..
Good conclusion
Very useful dibet
bahut achha party should not expend on candidate election .
i think among other things .. simultaneous election will also lead to increased voter turnout..
Constructive no confidence means ,if ncm is brought in house ,then cm will also brought in house .I.e.if ncm will pass then cm will also have to pass so that no President rule in state and no mid term election.
Subhash kashyap sir gave impressive points as constrative no motion confidence but what about article 365 ,356
Suresh Raut ...sir as i just want to add that there should be an amendment to the art.356 and 365 and appointment of the governor
hence this may be effective as 100%solution for this issue
correct me if i am wrong
Mukesh Kumar Yes.. I got your point.
Suresh Raut sir one more thing under which circumstances use of article356 and 365 is difficult to implement with respect to 74th amendment how local government is barring Central government to implement president rule??
Mukesh Kumar .. sorry sir my mistake, plz read it as 44th Amendment act.
Not possible ..5 yrs term is fixed ..if dissolved earlier, then again elected for next five years .then how the date will be same for two parties dissolved at different time.
Kurbaan ji samjh nahi paye aap kashyap ji ko
Exactly....kashyap sir was raising a very valid point
Yes..his point was very much vaid. constructive vote of no confidence can resolve 90% of the issue though not 100%
Loksabha aur vidhansabha milkar lenece desh ke hit me hai
Jati aur dharm ke naam par bante desh me ek saath chunaw practically possible nahi hai....iske bajae political party ke spending par capping tatha maximum 2 round me chunaw karwana chahiye......
Pros -
Will save a lot of money of EC - 4000 crore
In election there is no limit in political parties expenditure. Official estimates are 30000 crore expenditure in an election. Moreover there are incidents like caste violence, corruption, bribery, black money circulation, vote bank divide etc during elections. Simultaneous elections will reduce frequency of elections and hence these incidents will reduce
Due to code of conduct, many govt projects get halted.Hence simu. election will reduce red tapism
EC already have experience of partial simultaneous elections (Many state assembly's elections are merged with lok sabha)
It will save time of teachers (As they are on frequent duties to conduct the poles), police and other bureaucrats
Cons -
Frequent elections keeps the representative accountable to masses. For example if a govt in center gets defeated in an assembly pole, it will work hard to gain the confidence of people
"Jb JB chunav aata hai, Garib ke pet mai pulav aata hai" - People actually like elections. In a democracy elections keep remind that the real power is in the hands of common people
There are many questions answered - like what if lok sabha govt is removed by no confidence motion, will all 29 state assemblies go through elections ?
Way to go -
This should not be a sudden one time process. A gradual process over the span of time will work as other reform are necessary like -
* Strengthening anti defection law to avoid frequent govt toppling
* CM and PM need to elected by house
* Constructive vote of no confidence, to avoid election even if govt falls
* In this type, a successor is decided already
nice debate....
Nice vedio
kurban ali ji misbehaving with subhash kashyap ni
356 deadly letter becomes Deadly Weapons
Well I am not in "Bhakt" category yet find this idea excellent and very practicable. This should stop a perennial focus on elections, generation of black money, tremendous strain on the Government machinery and saving of huge monetary resources. All elections right from Sarpanch, gram panchayat members, municipal bodies including corporations to MLA & MP should be held simultaneously. The tenure of all such elected houses should be gor four years and there would be no provision whatsoever for the dissolution of house prematurely . Like president Governors should also be elected by an electoral college ! In case the Government looses majority in between and no one else claims majority, Governor should run the state by selecting ministers from members of all political parties. So in the Center President would lead the Government ......
Democracy is preserved and present day hazards are also avoided.....
There should be debates on this issue across the nation and all elected houses..
Bhaskar Bhusari Good Views Sir
I am sending my video link please watch and Support for Election Reforms Jai Hind DHANYAWAD
Not every BJP supporter is bhakt of modi. BJP existed before modi and will exist after modi too. There are a lot of people who are somehow or the other associated with BJP who have brain, sometimes more than their left wing counterparts. It will be better for you and the party/ideology you are associated with, if you stop generalizing. You should know your enemies better than your friends, specially in politics.
1960 m to dono election eksath hote the ,par Bengal ko keu deprived kea tha tab nonbengali sodossyo eksath milkar ???
nic sir
subhash sir all are dont know the constructive vote of no confidence...
subhash kashyap ki baat samjh nhi paa rha host. mai hota subhash ki jagah to frustrate ho gaya hota.