Why I was not on Survivor Season 40: Winners at War
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 фев 2025
- Richard Hatch on why he was not on Survivor Season 40: Winners at War
directed, produced & edited by dante luna
/ danteluna
Filmed by dante luna & Malcolm Digital
/ eldantico
Book RICHARD HATCH for personalized video messages: www.cameo.com/...
RICHARD HATCH
/ hatchrichard
/ richardhatchofficialpage
/ hatch_rich
The part that sucks is that he withdrew from his PhD program. That shows how dedicated he is to Survivor.
Yea. That hurt me a lot. Also, fancy meeting you here. :)
I hope he can go back and finish. Can he not?
He can finish anytime, just more info for the pity party he is throwing for himself.
jana banana “pity party”
So be it but he deserves one, for sure.
We had someone return after several years to finish.
The man actually BIT A SHARK after it bit him, that ALONE should have gotten him back on season 40.
One of the best episodes of Survivor EVER.
No amount of being cool or kicking ass makes it OK to use your nudity to intimidate another player during a challenge. That's what he did to Sue Hawk. It's not about him being naked around camp; you can simply walk away from someone who is naked around camp. But Sue couldn't walk away from him on a narrow platform and a beam during a challenge; knowing that, he got up on her and deliberately intimidated and embarrassed her. If you haven't watched the incident, watch it. It wasn't OK. And props to Jeff and to the other producers for making the right call. There is no amount of awesome strategy or game play that makes it OK to sexually harass someone.
@@leoscorpio42 Please shut the fuck up.
That's a real legend for you
JudeMarchisio there is no excuse for his actions bro this channel is a joke
It’s absurd that the first winner ever isn’t going to be on the show.
Solito Reyes II I was thinking the same thing but I still going to watch it tho
It’s because he’s not appropriate and the things that happened last season
Solito Reyes II of course there was the little issue with Sue oh and when he smuggled matches into the game
Can it be possible for CBS/Survivor to make another season of 'winners at war' that are NOT on this season, like, immediately/soon? It'll give Richard and Tina to come back.
But yeah, I can't forget about that interaction/run-in between him and Sue. But I do believe Richard has learned his lesson. He won't be another 'Dan'.
Solito Reyes II not at all. Other than being condescending about being able to do something and never actually doing it, it is the same game played every time he has been on the show. Not terribly watch worthy. Boring actually. No shock value, no scheming, nothing. Yes, it could be editing. If he were truly clever he would play into that and utilize his talents accordingly.
Good call on cbs despite rationale....which is sketch.
At 5:07 Rich makes a fantastic observation that he himself downplays in this video.
In Season 6, 𝙎𝙪𝙧𝙫𝙞𝙫𝙤𝙧: 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝘼𝙢𝙖𝙯𝙤𝙣, there is an episode titled: “Girls Gone Wilder” (a reference to ‘Girls Gone Wild,’ an adult entertainment franchise that produced over 300 adult films of young women from 1997-2011) where two young female contestants (one of whom is just 18) tell host Jeff Probst that they will strip if he can get them peanut butter and chocolate. Rob C., a male contestant, jokingly pleads with Jeff to fulfill the girls’ request. Next thing viewers see is Jeff bringing out a plate of peanut butter and Oreos goading the girls on. Not only do the girls take their tops off, they also lower their bikini bottoms to their ankles showing everything-not just their breasts.
Jeff Probst played a part in literally manipulating the situation behind-the-scenes to get two young women, one who was barely legal, to show it all. As Rich states at 6:42, the hypocrisy from Jeff is ridiculous. The show benefited and profited from these nude scenes that were considered “family friendly” back when they aired; Now Jeff is trying to rewrite reality after initially profiting from the show’s openness with nudity.
Jeff needs to go
At 5:20 those girls VOLUNTEERED to take their clothes off if the chocolate and peanut butter were provided. Jeff did not specifically ask them.
Correct. Probst hasn't done anything wrong. His jobs never been in jeopardy
However, he did allow them to objectify themselves. I think Jeff is a hypocrite for making it seem like Richard Hatch did something when he did not!
@@russellsimoneaux832why would jeff ever want to be put in another richard/sue situation and feel attacked for not stopping a guy who cant help but get naked on national TV. Why would you want to have to babysit adults on a national TV show? Cause Richard gets a kick out of testing peoples limits. Richard hatch does that crap for attention. He always wants the attention. Hes arrogant, doesn't shut up, and just because he won season 1 doesnt make him a legend, he also played with some absolute idiots in season 1. His second season he didnt adapt well at all, now hes old and would be up against 19 other winners who as arrogant or humble as they were, wouldnt enjoy hearing or playing against "Richard, the greatest survivor winner/player ever" Hes so unliked I cant even see people using him and taking him to the end like a Phil Shepperd only because hes so disliked. And lets face it, if Richard Hatch did what he did after this whole ME TOO movement bullshit he would have been removed the game the same way if not quicker than Dan. Tell me Sue didnt personally feel attacked just as much by richard if not worse than Kellee did by dan? I'll enjoy watching another Hatch-less season of Survivor. Its 2020. He can walk around his house naked all he wants and watch 20 other previous winners 👍🏻
@@spicoli3357 That's your opinion. Although clearly your opinion is based on just what you saw from that episode. As far as the Richard Hatch Sue Hawk situation. They edited that episode To make you feel that way. That's not the whole story. But whatever. You're entitled to your opinion. I just don't agree with you. Jeff Probst has become full of himself. They keep trying to change up the show With things like idle Island and different kinds of idols. Instead of going to different places and experiencing new things. Sadly, the show has changed And I don't enjoy it like I used to. Jeff Probst never wants to leave Fiji. . I think that's a mistake. I think we're seeing the end of Survivor. Sad.
@@russellsimoneaux832 then stop watching it? Simple. And I'm sure they have their reasoning for Fiji. Go watch season 40 with Richard, you two can complain all ya want
Here's my $.02..... IF the "Dan situation" wouldn't have happened, we would have seen you on S40.
Yup.
Stating the obvious
I agree. Dan basically ruined it
Yep
Without a doubt
Hatch is not mentioning that Sue Hawk accused him of sexual harassment in Survivor All Stars, & pulled out of the game because of it. It wasn't his nudity in the first show that was the issue.
During the challenge in Allstars where that supposed incident took place, Probst told the tribes (or at least Sue's tribe according to her) to balance across specific platform beams. When Sue went down the beam towards Richard and his bare ass, you would think she would have surmised that in order to maneuver around him they would have to go close quarters if she wanted to get past the large naked man and on such a thin platform it would be difficult not to graze her especially with Richard's extra weight if of course there even any contact at all. We all know he is very comfortable with nudity something Sue had plenty of time to learn in Borneo, fully aware of her former tribemate and his more recent indulgence in doing challenges nude (likely to his credit a machiavellian strategy of unnerving his competitors), Sue in that moment chose her path towards Richard, the producers chose to allow Richard to remain nude even in a challenge where close contact is largely unavoidable which eas completely their decision but Richard takes all the flack for it such from those like you who make Richard out to be some sort of aggressor. In the moment Sue and Probst gave Richard a mild chiding, if it would have been a touch of any real significance he would have elicited a much clearer reaction from her but it didn't but rather she had a bit of a delayed reaction to it back at camp. I'm not saying she lied but there was most certainly a difference of perspective on how the situation played out and she and Richard both talked it out and discussed it, even though you don't hear Sue complaining about it now the show won't touch Richard because they have let that incident alongside his blunt candor muddle their image of him so they toss him aside in some misguided effort to avoid controversy even though the show is the biggest instigator in gaining controversy.
@@skytron11 All that happened before #MeToo & the Harvey Weinstein trial. I am not disagreeing w/ anything you say, but the current conditions in social media are different than they were then. If this issue is taken up, it might cause the show a world of hurt.
@@hifrommike2120 I do see your point, you are quite right but I think you will notice the subtleties with the situation compared to the other instances of the Weinstein effect. Typically we are not able to watch the event unfold right on our television screens as opposed to many situations of the Weinstein effect where we usually hear about a number of egregious stories after the fact and it can be up to a number of victims but we had the chance to witness, the one potential blemish on Richard's reputation, compared to those like Dan Spilo, Louis CK, or Matt Lauer, its not even close to being comparable. It is still a very good point but Richard's absence in season 40 may come down to simply the pettiness of Jeff Probst with throwing Richard under the bus because of course the show can easily bend the narrative to whatever they desire.
@@skytron11 One of the producers of Survivor (Mark Burnett) once called it "unscripted drama." That may be true, but the finger has been on the scale all along. Rudy was kept on when he was about to be voted off because producers thought he attracted viewers. Producers have had a wide leeway in what they allowed to be seen, & let's face it, the narrative is invented in the editing room. The bottom line is that the producers didn't want Hatch back on. They had their reasons & stated them, but I would add this: Hatch is a loose cannon, cannot be predicted, & the current social climate of the US is less conducive to a gay nudist bear.
@@hifrommike2120 definitely agree there, Richard is a strong-willed individual and I'm sure they are especially irritated with his propensity for whistleblowing all of the show's dirty little secrets and I think it was him that first revealed that they intervene more than they would have us believe.
WOW, we almost had Richard in season 40. I wanted him to be there so bad after I saw that we would have an all winners season ... What a shame.
Still gutted. If there was a season for the original winner to return on, its this one. Hopefully they do a legends season or something that will give Richard a 3rd apperance he is long overdue for
I completely agree with you! I would hope for that. Unfortunately I think Survivor is just about over. They really messed this season up big time. There isn't a All stars without Richard & Tina Period. Shame on Jeff for making Survivor soft like other shows have turned.
hmmm i think it will be difficult for him to come back now having said so many disparaging things about Jeff in this video.
the whole situation is very sad, I totally agree that Richard should have been on the show. Obviously someone panicked because of what happened with Dan last season
@@ESCTom And they're RIGHT to panic. Remember the incident with Sue in All-Stars?
@@gameshowguy2000 The incident with Sue was bullshite. That was all Sue and editing. Jeff Probst has become full of himself. Sadly, Survivor is coming to an end. .
hatch is probably not gonna play again after what happened in season 39. you bet the producers are gonna be extra careful about sexual harassment.
Richard makes a lot of great points, especially in regards to the differences between nudity and sexual harassment.
HOWEVER, I really don't think he should so easily overlook the incident that occurred with Sue Hawk in All Stars. Maybe since it was so long ago, not as many people remember, but it was a MASSIVE deal and is probably the closest thing to sexual harassment that the show has seen (at least until the S39 issues)
CBS and production had to pay Sue Hawk a private settlement due to the incident that happened at the challenge, and I'm sure that it was THAT that had made the executives question Hatch coming back. If they had to do any sort of settlement for Dan/Kelly, they may be thinking, "Hm, should we really open ourselves back up to the possibility of legal action, just to have the original winner on?"
I can't be the only one that could see EVERY morning news outlet playing the Sue Hawk explosion from All-Stars and the Kelly confessional from S39, talking about how the show has actually done nothing to change its ways.
If the Sue Hawk situation had happened post-S39 Richard Hatch would 100% would have 100% been expelled from the game just like Dan. Times and culture have changed, social media wasn't really much of a thing back when the Sue Hawk situation occurred, but now that it is a thing it makes Sue Hawk situations 10X worse.
Shadow Ninja Definitely 110%. I think that just since All-Stars was sooo long ago, not a lot of people remember. But it’s extremely relevant to the current climate of the show
Agree. If a man's privates rubbed against me, I would be F***ing pissed and I think that the producers made the right decision.
@@nwandoe3599 He didn't rub his privates on her. She made a big deal out of absolutely nothing. The loud mouth knew she wasn't going to win anything so she pulled up some fake harassment claims out of her ass.
@@JudeMarchisio No. How would YOU feel if someone did THAT to YOU?
Well, Matt, I’m happy to address the “Sue Hawk” situation, and I will do so in an upcoming video. Then, perhaps, you will address the Matt Barber situation in which you and others like you pretend they know things they are outright imagining without putting any critical thought into their perspectives.
I spent an entire season on Survivor with Sue during which she and I were both often naked. Further the woman was more crude and sexually explicit with me about her sex life than any woman had ever been. Oh, and did you forget I’m gay and have never had any sexual interest in women? Those are some of the things that should have made you skeptical of salacious reporting. Things you probably don’t know include the fact I was voted off the show and unaware of Sue’s claims made after I’d left. Further, Sue has informed multiple people she knew she couldn’t win and planned to figure out a way to extort CBS. Add to that, we all (Sue included) watched the unedited footage from all four cameras showing how she turned around in the challenge to intentionally instigate interaction with me, and I NEVER touched her or anyone else - despite the salacious reporting and false claims. So your contention I ever did something to her or anyone else is ignorant and inappropriate. Had you interest in sharing an opinion, it would be helpful to learn more about what is true before acting like the typical ignorant bully your comments make you sound like.
. Probst's comment about "now a family show -so not comfortable with Hatch's nudity" is incredibly absurd since we all know all he has to say is "no nudity in challenges" and Probst had a big hand in the Sue becoming distressed by not saying that for that challenge. But no offense but you not mentioning Sue here wasn't a great look.I personally already know what you've said about it but a lot of others probably don't and were probably waiting for that here. Probst also came off sounding homophobic with those comments though I'm sure he did not mean to. I think you need to make the follow up Sue video right away to avoid all the clap back about how you glossed over it here.
They are completely ruining the winners season fans looked forward to for so long by having it be EOE so you're probably glad not to deal with the bullshit of EOE which is rigged for a young ahtletic man to win.
I'm sorry that this happened to you. It sounds like a really messy situation and no one has a right to judge something they see on a heavily edited TV show. I hope you find common ground with CBS and Jeff. It is a loss to not have the OG king around for 40.
Because of Dan a lot of viewers and fans were bringing up the Sue's distress so that's why.
Thank u for posting this video Rich. We discussed this on twitter back in December. My guess is unfortunately Survivor is coming to an end pretty soon. Probst has total control of the show and doesn’t listen to fans and lies. He has his favorites. He got full control season 39 right? Look what happened under his watch. Then removing u from winners season cuz he messed up is tragic. Will miss u
I’m a recent survivor fan who went back and watched your season. The way you figured out a winning strategy without ever having seen the game played before was incredible. You’re truly one of the greats it’s a huge loss not having you on season forty
In my opinion Rich With todays WOKE society I think they viewed you as a liability rather than an asset. Think about it, the way survivor has changed. Jeff no longer says come on in guys because he wants to be inclusive. They are casting isn’t very diverse meaning we don’t see any older folks or hardly any athletic people anymore. The show was supposed to stand for anyone can play regardless of age, strength etc. now to appease society they are too scared to push the envelope, to me Rich you are not bad and your mature enough to know boundaries. You where entertaining when you where on the Celebrity Apprentice
Thanks Matthew!
The whole woke argument is a joke. Stop playing copycat and think for yourself.
It’s a shame that Richard hatch isn’t in 40. imagine if he came full circle and won 1 and 40. Omg that would be survivor history. Tina Wesson should have come back too. These people are survivor history
Did Tine agree?
Lol he wouldn’t have won anyways! Did you see how the older players got cut so fast? lol
I don’t think he would have won winners at war but I would have loved to see him play again
It is truly absurd that you are not on this season. Agree and sorry that they did this to you.
The irony of this is that every player has been and will be playing your strategy
I was a 5 year old kid living in Australia when I watched the first season of survivor, I’ve watched every episode of every season since then, including Marquesas which didn’t air in Australia at the time.
I’ve always told everyone that will listen that Richard Hatch is still one of the greatest players of all time who put survivor on the map and played a game that transcends survivor eras, he could play in any season and do well and not having him on an all winners season is one of the biggest travesties the show has ever seen.
Thanks for everything Hatch and thanks for making so many people fall in love with a show that has become such a great part of our lives.
#TheGOAT
It was crushing to hear that you were removed from this cast. You and Tina deserved to be out there. I cant wait to hear your thoughts on the season as its airing at some point, either on here, or RHAP or something.
Meanwhile...
“Naked and Afraid”
🤣
Stoooop lmfaoooooo
Its a good thing that they ban nudity. It makes everybody uncomfortable and when you go for shock culture, accidents are bound to happen. They don't want another Sue Hawk incident which is good. What is suck though is that Richard has to abandon his PhD.
I wonder if Jeff would describe the peanut butter incident as "kinda being inappropriate"
Taylor Bradford he didn’t touch her see his video about all-stars
Jeff didn't ask them to take their clothes off - Hatch misrepresent that. Jenna volunteered that she would take her clothes off for PB and chocolate. Jeff didn't discourage them, but it was all Jenna's idea.
Stacey Spencer Exactly. If Jeff had said 'Hey, get naked and I'll give you...', to a 19 or 20 year old girl, even back in 2003, he'd have likely lost his job. So misrepresenting that, undermines any argument that Hatch might have had (if he did it on purpose... which I have to believe is possible).
I wonder how he defends Sandra disrobing Sugar in AllStars. I mean, there's no subjectivity, it's written law.. Disrobing someone IS sexual assault.
@@staceyspencer2369 and its insensitive to allow it to happen, maybe another contestant might be offended and afraid to speak up.
People are always throwing around phrases like "iit doesn't matter what was meant by the action" or "it doesn't matter if you meant to be offensive" but it doesn't seem to go both ways. Honestly it only applies to white men.
He's right being the original survivor winner. He should have been on season 40 winners at war.
And maybe he would have if he didn’t do supremely questionable things in past seasons and refuse to acknowledge that it was wrong and he shouldn’t do it again?
@@peacechickification found the homophobe
@@firstnamelastname1882 did you find the homophobe or the person that's against sexual harassment and whoever tries to use it for their personal advantage?
@@peacechickification imagine hating gay people so much that you think they are trying to use it as an “advantage”. 😂😂
@@firstnamelastname1882 lmao being gay doesn’t make you immune to criticism
Richard Hatch and Rudy: my two first favourite Survivors! Childhood memories! Hope to see Rich on a future season again.
This was insane. Rich Hatch is and will always be the ultimate survivor and the franchise owes him. I’ve been wearing my season 1 buff as a face mask and whenever I get a compliment I say “yeah, it was Rich Hatch season” and everyone knows him....even teenagers. I love reminding people of him.
You mentioned the stripping for peanut butter incident on Survivor Amazon. One of those girls, Jenna Morasca, went on to win that season, and like you, will not be on Season 40. I have some issue with how you characterized this incident. What made the air, and has been backed up by interviews and I believe Rob Cesternino's podcast, was Jeff Probst mentioning how temptations would be offered. Jenna specifically wanted chocolate and peanut butter, and SHE was the one who offered to take her clothes off for those items with Heidi chiming in too. This does not sound like Jeff "challenging" them to get naked. Yes, he provided the temptation they wanted (almost... Oreos instead of chocolate), but you make it sound like Probst initiated this incident by daring them to get naked. I think this is an important distinction.
What he means is that he allowed that incident, which means that Jeff wanted to see them too💁🏽♀️💁🏽♀️💁🏽♀️💁🏽♀️
@@rachdiaz896 Agree that Jeff allowed the incident. In fact he even encouraged it by making sure that the requested temptation item was acquired. I believe Rob Certernino said that it took about 30 minutes for production to get the peanut butter and cookies. Richard Hatch made it sound like Probst initiated this incident.
jenna has beenarrested since she was won so thats why she wasnt brought back anyway
Jenna M has a drug arrest and Brian shot a dog..reasons why they won't appear on survivor
@@Sum01ita probst & production both hate Brian Heidik he used to get in arguments with probst behind the scenes in Thailand, he was asked for all stars & said he would only come back if he received an extra $50,000 regardless of how long he lasted in the game & both probst & production were pissed about that & he ended up getting cut because of that he was considered for a short time for heroes vs villains however probst & some other producers felt too repulsed to include him again
I wish this was like 2 hrs of richard hatch just talking about anything related to survivor. Sad to see him being cut out of this
The unfortunate thing is now we probably won’t be able to see you on legends or in the future. It sucks because you are an iconic character and to have neither you OR tina on 40 and getting nick, sarah, etc, is a disgrace
We dont need him. He is a rapist, not a "iconic character". Forget him
Carlos Isaza Valencia definitely not a rapist lmao
I don’t like Sarah at all, but her season 34 gameplay is pretty damn good.
@@carlos0isaza hes not a rapist. Even if he did rub up against her which he didnt. Hes not a rapist please learn the definition
don't drag sarah like that she is survivor hall of fame level
You’re the first gay person I saw on television that wasn’t a stereotype was the reason I fell in love with the show wish you were out there representing the community
It's such a crock that there's an All Winners season but you're not gonna have the original winner. Just won't be the same without you Hatch
Sue Hawk Should ALSO BE BLAMED 4 Richard Hatch NOT Being On The Season 40 Winners At War Cast.... *Cause Of What Happened On Allstars When He Was N*de During A Challenge n Sue Was Told 2 Move Out Of The Way So He Could Get Past Her n SHE FLAT OUT REFUSED AND HE BUMPED INTO HER SO SHE IS AS MUCH 2 BLAME EVEN MORE THEN JEFF PROBST*
100% the fans lose. You (and Tina) are two of the most iconic winners and the season will be worse without you on it.
StarlightRose lol Tina isn’t close to iconic, wake up
CharlieConwayFTW
she was the winner of the most popular season
Brady Campbell the SEASON was popular, and that’s mainly due to how successful the first season was, not the winner, and last I checked everyone wanted Colby more than Tina
Brady Campbell well she wasn’t popular in her season if you call people to name 10 season in survivor they would say more new school or actual popular season like heroes vs villains
Robert D.
i can’t remember who it was, it might’ve been jerri, but i remember one of the contestants from australia saying when they all went out together after the season aired everybody knew who tina was and they were all going up to her and she was getting a ton of attention. she’s definitely one of the most popular winners
I mean, after the Sue Hawke incident in All Stars, this makes sense TBH.
No it does not. Richard Hatch did nothing wrong. Innocent until proven guilty remember!
Mahmoud Bin Garad wtf are you talking about? It was on camera on national tv for an eternal archive. He shoved his dick into an woman he barely knew for no reason. He acts like it was “because he was naked” as if people don’t have eyes of their own.
@@mahmoudbingarad6320 in a court of law it is innocent until proven guilty. In the court of public opinion there is a different standard. Hatch didn't go to jail, he just didn't get a chance to play a game that he has already played twice and Survivor didn't want the whole season to be about Hatch (which it would've been especially with EoE).
@@ryanreilly664 No he did not. He was on a very tight pole trying to maneuver his way to the other side as he was required to do by that challenge.
Sue Hawk just used that as an opportunity to give herself an alibi for quitting.
@@johndavisson344 Hatch only won once. He did not win twice.
Bottomline is the viewers absolutely wanted to see Hatch there and production made a big mistake not bringing him back - especially since he was available and willing to play this time.
Much as I would have loved to see you back Richard, I'm honestly shocked they even invited you given what happened in season 8. You would 100% have been expelled from the game if your incident with Sue Hawk happened today. It's not some little thing that everyone will just forget about.
Well that is very true I remember that incident still to this day what gets me is to this day he will not take responsibility for what he did I'm in this video he said it was editing and he was blaming Jeff probst I'm sorry I don't want to see someone like that play a game I love
Shadow Ninja go watch his video explaining the Sue incident. You’re welcome to edit or delete your comment afterwards LOL
He said it was edited. I believe him. Richard wouldn’t lie, Producers would.
AJStoriez what makes you so confident that richard wouldn’t lie? if the incident really happened, wouldn’t it be in his best interest to try and cover it up?
@@ajstoriez4108 This here is silly logic - but I think I believe him too, just because edited or not it really didn't look like anything intentional in the footage we saw; looked like a small platform and he knew this was about to be an unavoidable awkward moment so he just kinda laughed, braced himself, and took his spot on the platform
It's a shame you couldn't be on the season Rich (and judging by this we will never see you out there again), but I hope you were at least able to salvage your school situation! Best wishes.
I mean I would agree and be sympathetic if Hatch hadn’t literally rubbed himself against Sue naked lol he conveniently left that part out
CBS conveniently left out footage of her clearing him, no contact, then deciding to turn around and go backwards for seemingly no other reason than to force an interaction. Theres also a long list of cast members that have spoken out about her intent to extort.
Way to be part of the problem...
In such angle .. I’m rubbing myself against people everyday 🤣.. but not naked . But then again - we are all naked under our clothes
What I’m saying is one needs to really twist and turn angles to accuse openly gay guy of harassing a woman.
Hatch is right , there IS a difference between being naked and sexual harassment.
@@BrandynQuigley her going back over to him isnt a “hey run urself on me” …. Yall make terrible arguments
@@natalkak.9622 never have i been so close to someone i rubbed my privates on them lol even while hugging
Rich never sexually harassed sue. Some of these comments are ridiculous. Rich is not the only survivor to be naked during a challenge.
Exactly
When you sexually harrassed a woman back in the All-Star Season, that alone was the reason why they didn't let you back in, especially after the Season 39 debacle. Also, you do the challenges naked, so that is highly inappropriate nowadays... Stop complaining about it Hatch, and get a life.
I still think he could have been on it. He probably learned from All-Stars. Idk tho
The king stays king
Richard ‘ I have no history of sexual harassment ‘ I guess he forgets rubbing himself while naked on a woman. I guess in Richards eyes that’s not sexual harassment.
@@selgomezfan1rcw - Sexual harassment isn't about "sexuality," it's about power and control. Go back and watch it again. He leaned into it and did it with great intent. He was messing with her. He meant to shake her up.
She could have jumped off the log at any moment
I don't think it was purposeful they both were trying to cross the same part so they had to squeeze by and neither wanted to fall off, It seems like an accident to me least
Regan Waite gay men can sexually harass women. What kind of idiotic logic is that?
Oh shut uuuup. I have a love hate "relationship" with Richard. Yeah, what happened with Sue on that tiny pedestal was cringy. But get over it already. He didnt pursue her. He didnt harass her. She had a right to be upset about what happened, but move on. What happened in season 39, wrong, it APPEARS to have been incessant and continuous. Does not compare to anything Richard has done. Yeah, he was naked a lot. And it makes me think, "seriously?" But it's his game, it's his angle during that challenge. And it worked.
This is confusing to me. Hatch is claiming that being a gay nude guy is why he would be problematic in regards to the recent sexual harassment problems the show has faced. Clearly his nudity is nothing compared to the Sue Hawk situation when she claimed he rubbed his genitals on her in a challenge and subsequently quit the game because she was so distraught about it. I would be more interested in him actually addressing this rather than changing the story to make himself look like a victim.
So the gay guy sexually assaulted the old lady in front of 20 cameras and there's no proof of anything. Seems like a serious and legitimate case.
@@thexamlop my point isn't whether or not he assaulted her. My point is that he is claiming that the reason he was not asked back was because he was a gay naked guy. Clearly the assault accusations were much more relevant to that decision and after the shit show that was season 39 I can understand Survivor exec's wanting to stay as far away from controversy as possible. I think Hatch speaks as though he is this great truth teller meanwhile he completely spins the story to his advantage. He's good at manipulation, that's probably why he won the game 🙂
@@kristadoiron3213 He made a 20 mins video about that. I believe the F-A-C-T that he didn't assault her should be more relevant than the "accusation". It was filmed, she's clearly insane and he's clearly gay. If that's not enough, that means you could go right now to the police and accuse me of sexual assault you'd certainly have a stronger case against me than Sue against Richard.
@@thexamlop the problem is that the public perception of that incident is that he did it. Survivor is trying to stay out of trouble with this kind of thing and keep it's audience. When it comes to the choice to have him on again or not the public perception matters. As for the fact that you keep mentioning that he's gay so he could not have assaulted a woman I think this is complete nonsense. The accusations was that he touched a woman with his genitals. Your sexual preferences have nothing to do with this act. I would also like to point out he purposely did that challenge naked with the hope that the threat of touching his naked body would freak out the other players enough that it would help him win. I've seen every episode survivor has ever put out and I can't remember anyone else ever doing that. It's not because no one else is smart enough to think of this. It's because no one else is willing to cross that line and be that big of a slime bucket. I'm glad he's not on this season because he's willing to cross lines that I don't think belong on a family show and I think the exec's made the right choice.
@@kristadoiron3213 His sexual preferences matter because if he was straight you would never see another straight man accusing him of that kind of thing during a survivor challenge, and if that happened nobody would ever care and certainly not 16 years later. The idea to touch Sue with his genitals would disgust him as (I'm sorry Sue) it would disgust most straight men as well. Also it definitly didn't happen so it's obviously absurd and unfair to punish him and more importantly the audience for it because season 40 will be worst without him. I agree the naked strategy is weird and questionnable but it was allowed, producers just had to change the rules if they wanted to.
You say survivor is going crazy to "keep its audience", do you really, really think if we do a national poll "should Hatch be on season 40" people would say "no" ? Come on, let's be real...
If you have Amazon Prime, you can actually watch the whole first season and see how Richard Hatch created Survivor as we know it today. All the other contestants were concerned about food, shelter, water, etc, but Hatch from the very first episode was coming up with strategy and forming alliances. By the time the other contestants woke up and realized what was happening, it was too late for them. For all the Survivor fans out there, I recommend watching that first season. Then you will truly realize what a mistake the show made by not including him in S40.
Matt Rountree Thanks for the support, Matt!
Richard Hatch is the face of Survivor. He was way ahead of his time in strategizing ,alliances etc. He also didn't have any past season players to study off. He played the perfect game from the shows infancy and set the standard for other great players to copy, but of course they did a lesser job.
Jade Warrior Thanks Jade!
Matt Rountree Thanks Matt!
You deserve to be in season 40 winners at war because you WON THE FIRST SEASON YOUR HISTORICAL
If you’re thinking about the Sue Hawk incident, then you need to watch his other video explaining what actually took place and how insane Sue is.
Hard to believe you weren't there.
Richard has selective amnesia. It’s not about him being naked, it’s what happend with Sue Hawk. I’m glad he’s not on season 40, not because he doesn’t deserve to be on, but because of the negative attention it would bring to this season after what happened with Dan. No Survivor fan should want that negative attention on the show...negative attention = cancelled show.
Well atleast Russell Hantz wasn't on the season too, the reason being is he absolutely SUCKS at the game and it saved everyone from seeing the foregone conclusion of him being the first person voted out.
I swear Jeff has done everything he can to ruin the golden concept Mark Burnett came up with 20 years ago and hes getting pretty close to finally succeeding
Check out the Australian seasons, particularly the last three. Survivor how it used to be played (but better!)
You are a cancer cell
Bring back Hedick!🙃
First off, I am not and never have been a Richard Hatch fan. Sorry, Rich. I don't agree with your views on many things, including your tax evasion. Look, man -- you messed up. You should have gone to jail. I think that you did Sue Hawk wrong in All-Stars, and hope you made your peace with her. (whether she considered it sexual assault or not is up to her, not some poster from below) I also hated the way you played the game in Season 1. Too cold, too distant. And I'll never agree with your election as being the first Sole Survivor. Those are my feelings.
That being said, you are completely right in calling out "Survivor" as being hypocritical and two-faced for not including you in the Winners at War edition. Even though I vehemently disagree with you being a Survivor winner, you are, in fact, a Survivor winner, and should have been given the chance. For someone -- whether it be the producers, the advertisers, or some knucklehead like Probst to fear that you would engage in something inappropriate at any time is a symptom of what's wrong with society.
The whole situation underscores the fact that I am proudly no longer a liberal. For decades, conservatives went overboard in their restrictions on society. Now zealot, fire-eating left-wingers are also engaging in restrictions. Write a famous book and then come out later with your own opinions on something in society? Book gets shunned. Angry because there aren't enough minorities representation? Cause such a whiney, whinging howl that networks like CBS publicly decide to engage in SEGREGATION by putting a person who fits a certain race/gender/sexual orientation/whatever in a show instead of a more qualified person who does not meet that criteria. It's a violation of what Martin Luther King, Jr. said: "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Is it the fault of the book that the author has an opinion? Should it made as to the book's quality (or for that matter, a movie, or a piece of art, or whatever? Hitler was one of the principal founders of the Volkswagen company -- should we denounce their fine vehicles as fruit from a poisonous tree? Putting a capita on who should appear on a show is simply making quotas, and really is the same as saying who can eat a certain lunch counter or drink from a public fountain or use a public toilet.
It's disgusting. There are so many fears in society about how to act right now, both from the right and the left, that the joy that we all shared once has dissipated and people are being expected to act as proper automatons. We're heading towards a dystopian, war-filled future fast, and anyone who is a radical member of either side is completely guilty of driving that boat.
I agree. You should have been on the show. Your a big personality and good/bad you would have the made this season more talked about. If people are talking they are watching, the show keeps getting renewed.
I cannot BELIEVE my favorite survivor winner has a RUclips channel now. So so happy you're doing this, Richard Hatch! Love you!!
I’m a huge Survivor fan and was confused why he wasn’t on. Hearing he withdrew from his PhD, then got screwed over, really upset me. Really shitty. I was a huge fan of Jeff. But I’ve lost respect for him lately. That Kelli incident last year was disgusting how Jeff/production handled it.
Farzin Vousoughian it was disgusting, they should have listened to kellee and handled it better
I agree, they pushed Dan out for PC
It's not about you being naked. It's because you brushed up against Sue and they can't have a similar repeat due to Dan in season 39. It's a shame, you are fun to watch and I think you are right it won't be as good without you.
He would have been voted out and struggled on the edge of extinction.
Insane that you aren’t a part of this. Truly a shame. Oh what could have been...
I agree with most of this but the peanut butter thing was false. You made it sound like he came up with it and made them do it, Heidi (one of the girls) came up with the idea and they all hyped it up and she was serious so he got her the peanut butter. I still get your point though, he never once told them that they couldnt do it.
I wish the original winner Richard hatch was in the winners at war. I really wish
This makes me SO mad. I was most excited to see you when I heard the theme of the season. Especially after hearing your brilliant takes on the game on various podcasts throughout the years. You know how this game works. We got robbed
This is a poor video. You behaved in a way that you might not have intended to be harmful, but obviously Sue felt very uncomfortable. The fact is that you are responsible for that incident, and for that reason it's valid that producers won't let you back on the show. Of course it would be great for the first winner to be in Winners At War, but you are an adult and you need to accept that your behavior in the past does still affect how you're perceived by the audience of the show. To your point about Jeff 'making' girls take their clothes off, that's untrue, they volunteered to do that. Trying to twist the reality of those situations is irresponsible, and if you continue with videos like this, you're probably never going to get asked back.
I'm sure this could've all been easily avoided if they just told Rich "Hey, no naked stuff this time".. still gets to play but obviously just keep his clothes on. Seems like a fair trade off.
Except that Hatch is obviously not a rule follower or a law follower:)
And, how do you know that?
Hi Richard, I think you should have been on survivor 40 and you were great on season 1 back in the day. Very entertaining! I however didn't like the comments you made recently on your RUclips about white people. As an Asian man, I think making comments based on peoples race isn't right. However, still waiting to see you again sometime running down the beach on TV, cheers!
Richard, you remind me of Meghan Markel’s Dad. You are mad that you weren’t taken along for a 3rd ride. So now, you are going a tirade about how you’ve been wronged. Give me a break. You won S1. What did you do with it to grow the brand, build relationships?? Oh, that’s right, you evaded paying your taxes, spent time in prison. I’m surprised you made it on fit a second time. This show continues to be a success because it works. For 38 seasons it has been a tremendous win for CBS and all involved, NOT because Richard Hatch was involved. You’ve had your moments. Move along. Sure if what you say is true in that you cancelled your school, etc... I am sorry for you. They should not have cased you in the first place.
He doesn’t mention he’s a convicted felon...
Because of tax evasion after the incident, so your comment is moronic and redundant.
Reactionary Pleb
Do you understand the meaning of the words ‘moronic’ and ‘redundant’ as in; you moronic bather is becoming redundant!
An ad hominem realy now are you that fucking stupid? Your comment is redundant by the fact that his felony coviction has nothing to do with the whole "sue incident" next time be mature and realize An ad hominem being "no u" isn't a counter argument.
Because he was stupid and didn’t get it in writing that CBS would pay the taxes on his winnings in exchange for keeping quiet about Kelly giving blowies in exchange for samwiches. Burnett told Rich to team up with Rudy then got Sean and Dirk to switch their votes to Stacey at the last second. Otherwise Rudy and then a Rich go next and the series dies.
...because tax evasion relates to this in no way
Much respect to you, Rich. I saw you for the first time on All-Stars when I was only 8 or 9. Now that Canadians can apply for Survivor I have been trying to get on and hopefully if it happens I can make some huge moments and maybe even pull off what you did.
Richard's gameplay was the best. Fresh cast that never had another season to watch. He takes a loyal friend to the end, steps away from the last challenge to enjoy breakfast, because he knew Rudy couldn't make it and he'd get to take the goat to the slaughter in the end. Boss move.
A part of it was the sue hawk incident in allstars after season 39
Yeah everyone seems to forget this. THIS seems like the real reason, not that Jeff can't handle someone who "tells it like it is" or is naked all the time.
You were one of my favorite winners, heck I even rooted for you on the biggest loser, wish you the best mr hatch. Just found your channel hope for more information in the future
@@leeummradley no one forgets it but hes gay and sue was trying to extort CBS and it was proven that he did no wrong
So why did they “onboard” him for the season right up until they were about to leave?
leeummradley watch Rich’s video explaining the Sue incident. Look it up, and then make your comment. Let’s see
2:25 What abt Sue?
He should’ve been on this season instead of Ben. I mean really.
Dino Andes driebergan? or however you spell it, the guy who won a few seasons back
absolutely, and a few others I can barely remember
Ben was wicked tho. Dude was a idle hunter and made for some awesome tribals
Ben didn't deserve his win whatsoever. Christi was robbed.
@@dannigans Ben deserved that 100 percent, one of the only winners that I was rooting for from the start becides Rob on redemption Island, he was a roach at the end too. Dropping the Ben bombs
Tina was supposed to be on as well and wasn’t? What happened there?
This video is FACTS! Thank you for speaking out with such bravery and intelligence, Rich.
first of all okay he was called to go on a season. was it winners at war? i don’t really know. but there was just a situation that involved inappropriate touching. i don’t think there gonna put a guy that’s the exact same on there! plus i think it would be such a huge disrespect for sue and the other victims of the inappropriate touching. and you want to be on survivor? STOP talking bad about survivor. and jeff probst is great! he didn’t steal it from anybody! jenna and heidi actually came up with them getting naked. maybe if he actually watched survivor he would know what happened. jeff had nothing to do with it. it’s entertainment. and no not everybody walks around camp naked. nobody should. i mean it’s kinda disgusting i’m not speaking for everybody but i definitely am for my self that’s so disgusting!!! but i think richard hatch should definitely watch what he says! talking bad about jeff and survivor ain’t gonna land you on that show anytime soon bud.
Whats so disgusting about walking around naked vs being in nasty ass clothes? Makes no sense my guy
Jaicey Hollyfield nobody wants to see a small d!ck walking around naked they are there to play the game not to see a naked man walking around. and at least there’s clothes and they can wash off in the ocean. duh. but thanks for the lovely words! love your support!!!!
I would have loved to see you back again Richard! That first season of survivor was the best ever. There hadn't been anything like that on television before, and it wouldn't have been the same without you.
You can't have an all winners season without the first winner 😒 You will always be a legend!
I just wonder who was yours and Tina's replacements
Boston rob and amber
@@eamoneamons Rob was gonna be on no matter what. I have a feeling it's Ben and Michele.
Eamon J Jawatin Why would Rob be an alternate? As long as Jeff Probst is in charge and Rob is willing to play he’s going to play
Probably ethan and Denise would have been replaced
Probably Sophie was Tina's. She said she was an alternate.
if rich and tina didn't make it on last minute i wonder who were the two added to replace them last minute
I would have loved to see you on the new season. You're one of my favorite players and you definitely deserve to make a return.
Season 39 is the worst season of survivor ever. Just so awful in general, and then Dan.
Dan is the reason why you are not on season 40. Screw dan.
Ik it's years past the fact but it would've been really interesting to see how far Hatch could've gone on the all winners season, would they have targeted him right away for being the original king of survivor or would they have looked at him as an old, outdated player that can't hang? I'd assume it be the earlier given how old school players were targeted, but if Hatch could've masked his threat level between his age and it being a season littered with other equally big threats I genuinely think he would've had the potential for a really deep run
I do kind of wish we could see Richard Hatch on this season and its unfortunate that he won't be on, especially after being recruited for it and what he had to do to make himself available.
But let's not rewrite history. Its not Richard being naked that is the problem. It is Richard rubbing himself against Susan while naked, Susan quitting the game because of it, and CBS/Survivor needing to come to a settlement with her that is the problem. After the Dan thing happened, there's no way they ever would have let Richard on the following season.
And he's mischaracterizing what Jenna and Heidi did in season 6. They came up with that, it wasn't asked or encouraged by Jeff.
I would also validate your argument further, Shirin in very recent situations chose to be nude at times and it made it into the edit. Season 39 was horrible, but anyone with logic understands the difference in the situation with you and Sue, she was after a check. And got one. I have no idea how they think they can have an all winners season without you. You aren't just the first winner, you are a brilliant strategist. I am truly sad for you, I feel that you have been thru enough just based on who you are.
I can't believe they cut you out of season 40 for that reason. You should 100% be there for an all-winner season as long as you are healthy enough to be on the show.
He is still full of himself. I won't miss him
He was literally one of the most strategist, most entertaining contesting, and he was in the first season, this would of made it wayy better. just increase it to 24 players
you literally created survivor how can you have a season with all winners and not have the first ever winner of the show?
Kaylee Aldridge Probably because he sexually assaulted someone on the show once before
Butterfly Chirp wasn't sexual assault, you people think anything is sexual assault nowadays with your stupid #MeToo stuff
Who cares about a nudist first winner who gropes women for a living??? Let him continue groping as we continue enjoying a safe Survivor!!!!
Integer Consulting was definently not groping
EYE- he did not create survivor LMAO
Jeff Probst did not challenge Jenna and Heidi to take off their clothes they offered to do it in exchange for peanut butter. But yes Probst lied that it was about you being naked when it was about Sue Hark and people's perception that you assaulted Sue Hawk. Because everyone was stirred up about Dan Spilo.
This season could have been really good. I feel like it’s rigged because all the old school players were voted off right out the gate. I mean voting Ethan off third was just unnecessary. Leaving Rich out was a mistake too. It’s still entertaining but just could have been much better. I miss the ruggedness of the first 10 seasons.
Ethan siding with Rob was just dumb; they needed to break Rob down, so they got rid of his alliance.
7:17 who took Richard and Tina’s spots on S40???
Tina's spot was taken by Amber at the last minute
Hatch, i'm sorry you weren't able to be out there for S40. Like you said in the video, the fans and show lost out by you not playing. You should have been out there, and everyone knows that.
Me and my wife love Jeff and Survivor! For whatever reason it was, business is business and we move on. Everyone that's on the show is great and love watching it. Finishing up my video this week so I can send it in. If I get a call good, if not, I'll try again and if it doesn't happen for me, I'll move on. First rule of loyalty is not to talk bad about the person or show that made you who you are and that's said with a lot of respect and mean no disrespect at all. Be safe and blessed
The Dan situation mixed with the Sue situation in All Stars just isn’t a good mix. I don’t blame CBS for not wanting you back after that controversy so whilst it’s annoying that you dropped everything for Survivor, I kinda get it.
When i think of Survivor Winners i think of Richard, Tina and Ethan but only one of them actually got on to season 40
I knew I didn’t like Jeff, he has always rubbed me the wrong way
he wants to be on survivor but is lying and talking about jeff ? somebody please tell me how he will ever be back. also heidi and jenna said they would. did u watch survivor ?
They shouldn’t have treated you this way. You deserved to be there. I’m really disappointed they didn’t add you. Would have loved to see you there. I feel Survivor is out of touch with fans now
They definitely are.. the last couple seasons have been some of the worst ever
I was born four years after the first season aired, and I didn’t start watching Survivor until maybe five years ago. I finally decided last week that I would watch every episode and one day apply. I just finished the first season, and it is very clear that Rich was the ultimate Survivor: everyone just wanted to get to work from the start, but Rich was smart by trying to strategize and form alliances/thing about the long game. Having no other castaways before him to take an example of, this proves that he is the ultimate Survivor. Now I am sad that he was not on Winners of War, he should’ve been the FIRST choice, and the producers should have not gone back on their word.
You and Tina got robbed from the season. U and Tina both played great games showing early how Survivor is played. There are too many recent winners and there should have been more from older seasons. You were the first contestant I cheered for. Like the only reason you got voted out of all-stars is because they knew you were a threat. If you returned you would have been easily final 5-12 and maybe even won.
Richard Hatch should have been the FIRST person to be selected for Season 40. Period.
Awe I’m really sad now. I was actually really looking forward to seeing if you would be a huge threat early on or be overlooked and make a deep run. You’re one of my favorite winners and castaways of all time and I’m really sad we didn’t get to see you. I still love this cast, but you being there over like a Ben would’ve made it even more amazing than it already is
Jeff didn't bring up the getting naked. The woman did and he just simply didn't deny the idea 😂
It's the liberal left that is responsible for this. They like to virtue signal and then they pretend that they themselves are saints. You're right Jeff did make it happen--the stripping for peanut butter thing that Jenna and Heidi did. I've been watching since season 1 and he is guilty as sin, so he doesn't have any right to not let Richard on the show. Annoying, the seasons with Richard are always the best seasons. Too bad he's not on this season.
That would’ve been awesome