Thanks for the feedback Joshua. We try to do that by making it clear that we feel to make it worth your time you will want 1 hour per dollar spent on the game. This allows us to make a decision on the game based on what we feel the average gamer will get. So if you would get 20 hours out of a 20 dollar game that's pretty darn good so we tend to give it a 6-8 depending on the quality of those hours played. There are some games on the other hand that you might get 100 hours out of that cost 5$ so that would most likely receive a 9-10 depending on the quality of those hours. I know for you it might seem like a very small amount of money but for many of our viewers spending 10-60$ on a game is a lot to ask for. If you aren't worried about any other information about the game I would recommend you skip straight to the end of our videos just after the rating. At this point we give our final opinions on it and a clear statement in the very last line as to how likely it is to be worth the cost. That is the format we use for every "Should You Buy?" video so hopefully this will help you in the future. Thanks for the feed back I hope this helps you out.
@@GameAdvisors So you give a game a higher score if it's cheaper?! That is ridiculous! Like the above poster said, your score is useless then. The cost of the game should not even be taken into account. The title of the video is, "Should You Buy...." Your opinion of whether a game should be bought or not should only be based on the game itself. Not the cost of the game. Not everyone is in the same financial situation. So whether or not something is cheap or expensive, is entirely subjective. You should be scoring the game on it's gameplay alone. Not it's gameplay in conjunction with it's cost. Give an opinion on whether or not the game, itself, is good. And then people can decide for themselves whether or not they want to spend the money to buy it.
@@GameAdvisors How much fun you've had with the game or how profound it was should be the only metric by which the end score is given, I think that even giving an x/10 is futile and I go off all the other information. I think the review shouild be if it's worth your time and if it's worth the cost should be a boolean yes/no. Poorer gamers just pirate and only give devs money after they liked the game if they can afford it. Maybe you come from the idea that cost sets the expectation one should have for a game but using a formula to determine the subjective quality of a piece of art is futile.
I am very tired of people calling extraction shooters looter shooters, Borderlands is a looter shooter, Tarkov, Marauders, and Hunt are extraction shooters. If you are going to review a game the least you can do is get the terminology right.
thanks Simple and useful explanation maybe will give if a try since i have 2 hour free
what is the sense to fold a bag? same Size but not able to open anymore
Listen man, no offense but your rating score is useless. Tell me if it's worth my time not the cost of it, costs of game are miniscule
Thanks for the feedback Joshua. We try to do that by making it clear that we feel to make it worth your time you will want 1 hour per dollar spent on the game. This allows us to make a decision on the game based on what we feel the average gamer will get. So if you would get 20 hours out of a 20 dollar game that's pretty darn good so we tend to give it a 6-8 depending on the quality of those hours played. There are some games on the other hand that you might get 100 hours out of that cost 5$ so that would most likely receive a 9-10 depending on the quality of those hours. I know for you it might seem like a very small amount of money but for many of our viewers spending 10-60$ on a game is a lot to ask for. If you aren't worried about any other information about the game I would recommend you skip straight to the end of our videos just after the rating. At this point we give our final opinions on it and a clear statement in the very last line as to how likely it is to be worth the cost. That is the format we use for every "Should You Buy?" video so hopefully this will help you in the future.
Thanks for the feed back I hope this helps you out.
@@GameAdvisors So you give a game a higher score if it's cheaper?! That is ridiculous! Like the above poster said, your score is useless then. The cost of the game should not even be taken into account. The title of the video is, "Should You Buy...." Your opinion of whether a game should be bought or not should only be based on the game itself. Not the cost of the game. Not everyone is in the same financial situation. So whether or not something is cheap or expensive, is entirely subjective. You should be scoring the game on it's gameplay alone. Not it's gameplay in conjunction with it's cost. Give an opinion on whether or not the game, itself, is good. And then people can decide for themselves whether or not they want to spend the money to buy it.
@@GameAdvisors How much fun you've had with the game or how profound it was should be the only metric by which the end score is given, I think that even giving an x/10 is futile and I go off all the other information. I think the review shouild be if it's worth your time and if it's worth the cost should be a boolean yes/no.
Poorer gamers just pirate and only give devs money after they liked the game if they can afford it.
Maybe you come from the idea that cost sets the expectation one should have for a game but using a formula to determine the subjective quality of a piece of art is futile.
i read the game is infested with cheaters ?
I am very tired of people calling extraction shooters looter shooters, Borderlands is a looter shooter, Tarkov, Marauders, and Hunt are extraction shooters. If you are going to review a game the least you can do is get the terminology right.
I bet you have a lot of friends
this game will die for sure.
i think it has potential, keep in mind this is still a early access, lots more to come from the game, so these cons are likely temporary.
dont think so
@@Slpyboi-nr4pt thinks so
@@Redrum-707 I haven’t run into a single hacker yet
@@surryyy how long you been playing though