What Can We Expect From Boeing In 2023?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 янв 2023
- 2019 through 2021 was a fairly challenging time for Boeing. The US manufacturer suffered immense reputational damage due to the 737 MAX crisis. Indeed, in many ways, the firm is still dealing with the consequences of this narrowbody program in the form of added regulator scrutiny. However, the past year seemed to be a turning point for the company. Not only did it see numerous large aircraft orders, but it also managed to get the green light to resume 787 Dreamliner production. With these major achievements still somewhat fresh, can Boeing keep the momentum going? And what major bridges will it need to cross this coming year?
Our Social Media:
/ simpleflyin. .
/ simple_flying
/ simpleflying. .
Our Website
simpleflying.com/
For copyright matters please contact us at: legal@valnetinc.com 
Развлечения
Their goal is to get as many 737s and 787's delivered in 2023 to get their profitability back on track.
With both production lines running well below their intended outputs, I doubt there's much margin for profitability
@@luca7069 and rightly so
@@luca7069 They have plenty of already built aircraft to deliver that will help their numbers.
@johniii8147 the majority of the ready built aircraft need extensive rework to comply with updated FAA requirements, which is a pain in the ass and the opposite of efficient and streamlined production
@@luca7069 Boeings production hasn't been exactly effective last few years
I'll save this vid to watch at 2024 :]
Ooooooookkkkkkkkk
The 777 the new queen of the skies...? No. That's a title that will never leave the 747, even when the last one is retired. The 777 will have to settle for "Princess of the skies"
Agreed
The airline that would be most excited about a 787-10ER announcement is Air New Zealand. Hopefully certification won't take another 3 years.
It will
@@kirilmihaylov1934 Probably, but hopefully not.
@@sainnt Boeing has a lot of problems
@@kirilmihaylov1934 No doubt about that, but many of the problems aren't solely Boeing's fault, though many are.
@@kirilmihaylov1934 Airbus does as well. Highly foolish to think it's just Boeing
Nice content :)
Yes indeed the Boeing 777 should call, "The Queen 2.0".
The goal is to sell, and deliver as many airplanes as they can, to bring Boeing back to a profitable margin. (737-MAX, and the 787) I hope the 777-9X is getting closer to delivery. It's a shame how this very nice airplane, lost all that time due to many uncontrollable issues. Hopefully it can start to be delivered to customers soon. The 777-8X is also one that needs to be delivered.
Yes the 737 MAX that they lied about and got people killed . that 737 MAX
As a big airbus fan… I have to say something good about Boeing here… I just returned home via a 9 hour flight from Israel to South Africa on Boeing’s 787.
I was super impressed with the very high ceilings and what I could only describe as very noticeable noise reduction…
I may be a plane enthusiast, but I do suffer from claustrophobia to an extent, and I was a little shocked from the last flight … Because I got off the plane and it did not feel as if I was stuck in a metal box the last few hours. Maybe it was the huge windows. But it wasn’t a bad flight, dare I say enjoyable haha
I flew with Elal - their service was also very good.. and surprisingly contradicted a view about ELAL I heard from a friend prior to my trip.
Al in all… I really like the 787
Yeah, also as an Airbus fan, I'd have to say that the 787 is the best Boeing plane since the 747. I flew it on a 13 hour flight to Abu Dhabi from Chicago, and 15 hours on return and it was overall a great experience
Would you say that know it's construction was rushed hurried by supervisors worried about delivery dates instead of safety?
@@soccerguy2433I flew an -8 for the first time in April last year with Qatar Airways
@@soccerguy2433 The safety statistics of the 787 speak for themselves. It isn't an unsafe airplane.
I find it funny that your profile pic is a 747 lol
I think the real reason the Chinese government has not yet re-certified the Max is to give its own COMAC C919 a boost in sales, particularly with Air China and Air Macau, the former of which it owns a majority share (53.5%), and the latter due to it being majority owned by the former.
Chinese carriers will buy C919 with or without MAX. Not sure what’s the reason MAX aren’t flying but it could be bargaining chip with getting C919 certified by FAA because everyone knows Boeing will try to slow C919 certification
Nope…Airbus is going full blast.
China Southern's 737 Max 8s are flying again now, from a few weeks ago
@aaaalei294 good to know
@@Peichen01 Typical Chinese victim mentality. 737 MAX certification in China is being held up because China is trying to use it as leverage in the ongoing trade war with the US. A trade war the Chinese could easily have ended at any time by agreeing to stop their widespread industrial espionage against US companies. FAA certification of the C919 has nothing to do with it - in fact, the need for the FAA to certify the jet at all is basically zero when the C919 doesn't have the range to operate any US-China services, and no carrier outside of China is going to make themselves dependent on a Chinese-made aircraft with mostly Chinese parts.
Im mostly excited about the 737 max 7
You’re the only one. Even airliners aren’t excited.
I expect the details of the HGW versions of the 787 will be released.
Air New Zealand has already ordered 6 B787-10 HGW or B787-10 'extend range' for deliveries from early 2025.
I hope the 737 max doesn't cannibalize on its self hopefully Boeing can fulfill does order's consistently 🙏
I wonder if Boeing will reconsider creating a 787 variant to take the place of the 767, in terms of price, range and capacity. Maybe reconsider the 787-3?
@Simple Flying, what is the required retrofit change in the 737 MAX after the certification? Stall warning deactivation option? Full EICAS?
Yes
@@kirilmihaylov1934 which one?
@@owenesquivelphIt was a yes to all of those questions
Stall warning deactivation
3rd aoa sensor (although synthetic)
No Eicas, but the other things mentioned by Zobi_YT have to be retrofitted to all Max aircraft, also the ones built before
expect saudi arabia to order up to 70 plus jetliners soon
Thx for the video. I disagree with the steady progress. The company is working on mainly 1960s design 737 and a a little 787. Such a disappointment. You didn't mention about India assembly factory
On Jan 4 the Boeing 777 turns 30 years old
Shes still a beauty after 30 years 😍
Please can you do a video like this for Airbus
I WISH TO EXPECT NO MORE CRASHES!!!
Not exactly Boeing related but the converted freighter of the 700-300er has been in the process.
I like the thumbnail. The planes on it are both my favorite aircraft.
Not looking forward to the required training for a new EICAS system.
There are 4 MAX variants. The 7, 8, 9, and 10. You mentioned 3 when discussing the MAX7
When Boeing clears out the 737 delivery backlog, that will be a turning point.
Plane manufacturers always have a backlog. No backlog means no business but I get what you’re saying
Watching the day after the first Chinese 737 Max 8 commercial flight since the grounding
Well this aged well!
I just wish they can build a new midsize aircraft, to replace the 757s and 767s. Boeing seems to have more success in midsize and wide-bodies like the 787.
It won't happen
@@kirilmihaylov1934 It should, both the 757s and 767s are very popular planes in the United States. If they can get interest from Delta, American and United, it could be a good start since those three are the biggest airlines in the United States and Boeing is located in I believe Seattle.
There's talk of a re-engined 767F. Perhaps it can also be repurposed back into a passenger plane.
@@mattevans4377 I think it could be an NG version of the 767. After all it’s younger than the 737 so they still got a few more years of getting updated
Its the 737 max 10
Let’s see what the company has got.
Maybe a 787F launch too
No
@@flightsimfun7119 geez, I said maybe.
@@mmm0404 oh sorry
They will probably do the 787er not the 787f
@@Kay_jay_999 definitely, but Boeing won't be allowed to manufacture the 767F/777F beyond 2027 (emission rules) unless a waiver is granted.
Developing and certifying a purpose built freighter could take 3 to 4 years, so the clock is ticking for them.
The 777F will be replaced by the 777XF but currently no replacement for the 767F in sight yet.
What will happen with the naming scheme when Boeing eventually builds the 797. They've already used all the numbers between 7-/-7. Will they re-use older ones that don't fly anymore like the 707 to designate a new aircraft?
They already said logically it will go up the 8 series…. 808,818, 828, etc.
I'd wait and see if the existing number scheme covers the whole marketplace anyway.
I kinda wanted to see a 7107
@@Fay7666 7707?
@@ekuche8335 Boeing names their planes by plane type:
.
.
600 for missiles and rocket-powered devices.
700 for jet-powered commercial aircraft.
800 is presently unused.
.
.
Maybe they would call it 7107 or indeed start using 8x...
Boeing not being able to come up with a mid-size airliner/freighter for the smaller Regional/Municipal airports.
Also the consistent delays Borin- I mean Boeing keeps putting on the 777-X will still be consistent throughout 2023 and 2024.
And the consistent quality issues Boeing shits out with the 737s.
agreed
Boeing not being able to come up with a mid sized airline or freighter for small regional/municipal airports was down to them delivering their backlogs first before anything else.
The consistent delays with the 777x was down to pandemic and engine issues. This year we will see more test flights of the 777x.
There are no consistent quality issues with the 737s as they are delivering them again
@@nickolliver3021 numbers coming back in for the max 1000 flying now is 99.95% and they're saying is performing better than Boeing promised.
@@andrewlarson7895 yes over 1000 flying. People will always try to make out its the end of the world about the points they make. But I agree 100%
Have you heard of the 767F ?
"Consistent" quality issues on the 737s?
If I wanted to make an insensitive joke, and I won't because that would be wrong, but, if I did make one, it would be that Boeing's new year will start off with a bang, which I obviously wouldn't joke about because that's insensitive.
China Southern's 737 Max 8s are flying now😁
It would be an amazing transition if the first Boeing supersonic commercial airplane had the designation 808, it would differentiate flight eras from the 707 subsonic series to 808 supersonic ones. Hopefully coming in the 2040s and even earlier depending on how much the competition will push for innovation.
- "Is there anything we missed?"
The elephant in the room: Boeing's massive debt, which was about $66 billion in 2022. That's the reason why Boeing hasn't announced a new narrow-body plane, which it very much needs to be able to compete against Airbus' offerings (without Boeing selling its narrow-bodies at unsustainably low prices).
That already well known, hence why the main thing boeing has to do is to sell its planes this year
@@AverageJoe777 - “That already well known...”
And any of the following aren’t? (all were brought up on the video):
- regulator scrutiny
- green light for 787 production
- launch of the 777 freighter
- delayed certification of 737 MAX 7
- effort towards supply chain stability
- Covid in China affects suppliers
- last 747 about to be delivered
Also, the question asked was “is there ANYTHING we missed” (emphasis mine). It’s also good to take into account that people are not familiar with same things. You may know a lot about Boeing’s financial troubles, but there probably are quite a few who stumble upon this video who aren’t familiar with the matter. I’d bet that most in the public know more about the 737 MAX troubles than Boeing’s debt.
@@adoatero5129 I stand corrected. I was looking at this from an aviation enthusiast perspective rather than a business perspective. Its easy to see that many of things mentioned in the video are good signs for people to invest in the company without regarding the cons such as the debt
@@AverageJoe777 Good answer. Nice an wise 🙂.
Delta at JFK having these are what they need.
What about Airbus? What can we expect from Airbus?
Stabilize on the production of A320/a321neo family and the A350 family, as well as A321XLR certification.
when boeing 777x fly to hong Kong next year?
The 777-9 won't enter into service until 2025.
@@heidirabenau511 damn
2025 or 2030+
@@IndonesiaMajapahitNDPCA ikr
@@IndonesiaMajapahitNDPCA
777-9 : 2025
777-8F : 2027
777-10 ( if Boeing develops it) : 2030+
787-10 ER that doesn't sound right. I mean the 787 itself has an incredible range.
The -8 and -9 do, both being around the 15000km mark. The -10 however can "only" fly 11000-12000km closing some potentially key routes eg. Dubai-Los Angeles
When can we expect to see the Boeing’s management responsible for 737 MAX in prison?
“What can we expect from Boeing in 2023” not the 777X lol
at this point aviation is the only thing holding me together
I know one thing for sure. All my 2023 trips will be done on Air Bus aircraft.
Amen
Grow up kid!!
Thats cool, i can assure you that millions of other passengers won’t care and still fly boeing, because they care about what the airline offers like food and entertainment, not what company name is stamped on the aircraft.
@@AverageJoe777 I don't care what Boeing thinks, I don't care what you or anyone else thinks. I don't think Boeing is building a safe product. I will act accordingly.
@@bobdevreeze4741 cool! Doesn’t really change anything however, so in a way, no one really cares about what you think about boeing.
Interesting title? If recent events are anything to go by, nothing.. absolutely nothing. Possibly some more lawsuits but that’s it.
McDonnell Douglas will keep using the Boeing name and designs without offering any innovations geared to real safety and efficiency (window placements, glitchy software, structural integrity). They also failed to re-engine the 757 and create modern aircraft that aren't constructed abroad. The 737 Max 10 will probably be certified the same time as the 777x: mid 2024 at the earliest.
I do agree with you partially, boeing needs alot more innovation and put less focus on selling old narrowbodies. But the tooling for 757 was destroyed and it was an expensive aircraft to produce, so to re-engine the 757 is out of the question.
Well, probably not a 787-11 🥤
The 737 is fifty five years old and needs to be replaced. The 7474 was lauched in 1966 and enterd sercice four years later. The 767 was launched in 1978 and entered service four years later. Boeing is not the problem it is the FAA....
Extrusion???? Structure?????
Just so we are clear the 777 will NEVER replace the A380 the and will NOT be "The queen of the skies" i wasnt lucky enough to get on a 747 but, the 777 is uncomfortable, legroom sucks, noisey and the pressure inside is awful. The A380 will never be replaced unless they make an A380 neo that is more fuel efficient 😞
Except, the 747 is the queen of skies, not the A380. It was the nickname given to the 747 in the 60s-70s
The 777x is a different aircraft than any previous variant you've flown on - and 'legroom' is determined by the airliners and how many people they want to pack in to the cabin - the plane itself has very little to do with it past a certain point.
The A380 is the smoothest, quietest, roomiest plane ever made. It is unchallengeable for longhaul passenger comfort. I've never had a comfortable flight on a 777 - they suck from a passenger POV. But they make for much cheaper airfares than an A380 for a whole host of reasons (not simply fuel economy) so they are the plane that has and will succceed.
If Boeing announces the 787 EGW (787-10ER?), we will lose the 777-8X...
Very likely
No i don't think so airport slots will be at a premium down the road I believe.
@@andrewlarson7895 A 787-10ER can at high density almost seat the same number minus less cargo but without over excessive range
Hopefully not another 30000 ft dive
No it hasn;t regained it's reputation. THAT, will take years of Travellers watching whats going on.
Its reputation among the general public doesn't really matter, because Boeing doesn't sell products to the general public. And very few people are irrational enough to cancel flights that are scheduled to be serviced by Boeing aircraft. If airlines deem it beneficial to buy and fly Boeing planes, they will do so. Reputation doesn't matter.
What the hell. How can he even say B777X will be the next queen of the sky. It is real shit, when compared with the B747s.
I prefer the 777 to the 747. It's just a better plane.
@@triple7marc Well but 777 cannot be the Queen of the Skies.
@@kilo_alpha_sierra Sure. But the 777 is still a better plane lol
Allegiant flying a 737 looks and sounds so weird 😂
Boeing > Airbus
O novo B757-8x e o B757-9x.
Day 1 of Commenting randomly on videos related to aviation
Waiting for some top executives to go to jail.
2:30 The CCP is probably trying to make the Chinese market more amenable to the C919.
we expect flying planes from boeing !!!!!
After watching what to expect from Airbus in 2023... Boeing looks to fix the past while Airbus builds the future
"Fix its past" how so? Working on the MAX and 777x is "building the future" in my eyes.
Pray for hundreds of boeing 737 max victim....
Let's hope they don't make another plane going down ....
why would they make another plane going down?
they possibly will
@@ant2312 They possibly wont
@@nickolliver3021 let's hope
@@kirilmihaylov1934 you keep saying that. They wouldn't anyway
We like Boeing because is the first to test their planes live with passengers in.
It’s good hear that achievements of Boeing is provide safe aircraft’s I thought it was not necessary 😂😂
It’s so ridiculous that people are not choosing Airbus inspite of them providing safe aircraft since launch and not wait for the crashes and still airlines use Boeing pathetic
Typical airbus fanboy comment. Boeing is a much older company, and lets not act like airbus has 0 crashes, the A330 has 14 hull losses while the 777 has 8 hull losses. And both planes have similar numbers produced and was introduced around the same time.
@@AverageJoe777 Oh I don’t remember seeing any crash reports for their newly launched airbus plane like the 737 Max and I also didn’t remember seeing any quality issue from airbus side but can the be said for Boeing
Call me a airbus fan why will I not be if they make a safe aircraft and Boeing has been pathetic
@@aayushagarwal1075 Then either you hardly read the news or you must be ignorant, because the A350 has quality problems, specifically the paint chipping off on planes. Also, its quite obvious you’re new to aviation because there have been instances of airbus plane incidents occurring before, literally the first passenger flight of the A320 resulted in a crash (Airfrance flight 296Q) Both 269Q and the Max crashes are a result of lack of proper understanding of the plane itself. Its fine to love Airbus and their aircraft but lets not act like they’re a saint or some type of flawless company when they’ve been in the same spot at Boeing before.
@@AverageJoe777 wow paint issue is so very very critical than crash issues and those crashes were long back in modern aviation 2 crashes and production safety issue is just pathetic and you comparing to fatal Boeing crashes with pain chipping issue shows that you are a typical Boeing fanboy
@@aayushagarwal1075 Again, you sound ignorant right now. Paint issues are a quality issue and its to show that airbuses are not flawless machines. Also, many pre production planes have problems and thats why they’re pre production, to work out the issues on the plane. You also lack reading skills because I never compared the paint issues to the max crashes, instead I compared Airfrance flight 296Q to the max crashes (search up airfrance 269Q) Also, if I used your logic, should we forget about the Max crashes in 20 years because they would be old crashes by then?
Or b737 will be maxed out
Not going to happen!
It can’t anymore
@@filledwithvariousknowledge2747 how come
The only thing they can do now is add raked wingtips, which actually would not fit in the current 737/a320 size gates by a meter or so.
Their new jet will probably be a 737 sized aircraft with 757 sized variants
@@jamiesworld1690No more upgrades are planned other than cockpit related
The b777-500 and 700 and 600 and 800 series will be unveiled
The "800" is the 777-8 and why would Boeing make a -500,-600,-700 which would just capitalise on the few 777x orders!
Yes, all a380's will be replaced by the B777-700/ 800/ 600 series.
Boeing for the win. Wooho
@@heidirabenau511 to fil in the gap between b777-300 and 800 so they need 400,500,600 and 700 series to fill in the gap
@@jamiesworld1690 The name of a program means nothing to airlines and Aircraft manufacturers!
@@mmm0404 There will never be an 777-*** it is now just 777-8X, 777-9X and 777-8FX.
Boeing will slowly fall of the charts it will just be airbus and comac as dominant players
Why is that exactly?
more failures possibly
So many words lol
Boeing was a once great aircraft maker but turned itself into a screwup.
Because of money
Even Airbus was once a great aircraft maker but tuned itself into a screwup to because of money
@@nickolliver3021 haha your pissed as usual once you saw a bad comment about boeing?
@@wasmiddelsap3379 haha you got triggered yet again kiddo and BJTV member geek. Go watch and play your video games lol
@@wasmiddelsap3379 he is a troll
Bankrupt. Next question.
What to expect from boeing in 2023?
More woke nonsense, woke initiatives, and three bathroom choices.
Oh yeah, they might build some planes too.
After FAA hesitating to ban even after 737MAX crashed TWICE, I ain't flying the Max until China recertifies it.
I recently flew on a 737 MAX for the first time. It is as safe as any of the NG variants. No passenger appeared to have the slightest worry about flying on a MAX. There is no reason to, because the problem has been fixed. What China does is of no importance.
@@GH-oi2jf The damage is already done, it's going to take years for the trust to be restored,
@@ey7290 Who cares? The general public doesn't make business decisions for airlines lol
Yep. The industry capture of the FAA has brought us to the point where we trust the Chinese regulator more than them.
Deceiving and screwing the customers
How so?
Who the hell has paid you? Boeing!!!!!!!!!
Shut up Airbus fan. You should have your phone taken away from you!
@@filledwithvariousknowledge2747 im#####e what is your problem. UK(Ukraine)?
Good riddance to bad rubbish; the 737 Max aircrafts made by a heartless company that puts profit above human lives.
Promise to much, deliver disappointment. Does Boeing really consider this a successful business model?
What Can We Expect From Boeing In 2023? More failures.
Failures for what?
@@nickolliver3021 Boeing failures
@@ant2312 Airbus Failures #triggered again
First
More bad news from this company for this year, hopefully no more DEATHS! Airbus is where success and great news is!
Airbus has been in Boeing shoes on more then one occasion and they weather the storm. So hopefully boeing will as well.
@@andrewlarson7895 been nowhere near as bad as being in Boeings shoes
@@ant2312 airbus is just as bad, only if the dead people could speak im betting that's what they would say.
Boeing shoes? How? We have yet to seen an aircraft From AB that crashed twice in within half a year … guess what? Boeing has an answer for you, clown.
@@alvinloh9068 you all about Boeing ya tell me more...thanks
What can we expect from Boeing in 2023? More disappointment.
I think it's Boeing haters who will be disappointed this year just like in 2022.
Many of them will continue to be shocked as Boeing racks in hundreds of orders just like last year.
It's going to be lovely witnessing the meltdown
I just don't trust to fly on a 737,,Max
Boeing 778XL with 2 single powerful Royals Royce engines (largest engines built) with economy and point to point long distance ability of 14,000 nm. Extra wide and long body fuselage with a seating capacity of 700 plus using the 4 tier seating methods; first class, business class, premium economy, and economy. Designed for long distance, with extra room for all passengers. Seating will be designed to accommodate bio safety. The ceiling height will be between 47,000 feet to 50,000 feet maximum, which will ensure a smoother ride. Built in view of economy, it will be 37% more efficient than current modern designed airplanes in service today. This airplane will be ready in 2025/26. For now, enjoy the 777X...
50,000 lololol
Boeing wil annoubce their own double decker for 2025
Yeah right(!)
That will not happen
@@flightsimfun7119 why not
@@jamiesworld1690 because now we have big planes like 777 a350 787 767 and more and with the pilot shortage a double decker plane isn't coming the a380 didn't sell good because there wasn't demand for a380 and most airports taxi ways need to be upgraded
777x already almost too big, no shot buddy.
A lot more crashes !!! who bets ???
oof
I wouldn't be surprised by that happening, I don't trust or believe in boeing! Hopefully, no more DEATHS from these criminals!
@@wadehiggins1114 So Why would another crash happen Just because of what happened in previous years? Why still you don't trust or believe in Boeing? Deaths may happen still because 737s crash even if it was pilot error so that doesn't mean they're criminals
I bet not, they lost so much money from the impacts of 737 max incidents with compensation, loss of sales, and loss of reputation
Also you should keep in mind there has always been two trim cutout switches which allowed a kill to mcas (and all electric trim) which has been trained ever since the 737-100
You guys forget Airbus has been in Boeing shoes a couple times they still weather the storm. Yes we're talking crashed planes from bad design
Hopefully bankruptcy, inshallah 🙏
How come?
@marcw2001 they killed 400 people because Airbus was better in every way.
The 777X will be a flying deathtrap as well
@@Tcoc11 Wait, they killed 400 BECAUSE Airbus was better? That makes no sense.
“As well” insinuates that the 737 MAX is or was a flying death trap, which is false. It never was, and there’s no indication that the 777x will be.
@@Tcoc11 I hope you get banned from YT for life you sack of shit
@@Tcoc11 Typical uneducated Airbus fan
I was the 747th person 2 like this video. The 747 likes are very special because Boeing will be delivering it's final "Queen of the Skies" (Boeing 747-8i) to Atlas Air. Will we carry on ur legacy, proudly, "Queen of the Skies"!!!!🛫✈🛬✈
They already built it, it just has to be delivered
PO MENI USAVRSITI B747 KING OF THE SKY...BILO BI ZAISTA STETA DA NESTANE......
It's incredible that airlines are ordering the 60's technology of the 737. The A320neo is way superior.
It's incredible for you because you're not involved in airline business decisions. You simply read headlines. That's it. The MAX and neo planes are both perfectly fine.