Don't Put Your Trust in the Supreme Court | Ryan McMaken
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 фев 2025
- No matter how the court rules on birthright citizenship (or anything else), it certainly won’t be the “last word” on the matter, and nothing is decided beyond the short term.
Additional Reading
“Don’t Confuse Immigration with Naturalization” by Ryan McMaken: mises.org/mise...
“The Problem with the Arbitrary Line between Legal and Illegal Immigration” by Ryan McMaken: mises.org/powe...
Be sure to follow the Loot and Lobby podcast at Mises.org/LL
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
As said in the book "Anatomy of the State" by Rothbard, these supposed restrictions on government always turn out to be used to further abuse their powers. Especially in the case that government is the one who decides what is constitutional or not. They can just rule, as politically popular, based on what they can get away with to further invade in the lives of people.
Well said
Thank you, Ryan ✊
the SC should be elected directly by the people.
After watching a few minutes of street interviews I think maybe it’s best the public has nothing to do with the SC appointment. My bad
Finally! Thank you. This needed to be said, in my opinion.
The natural law exists - regardless of those who ignore it. Hell exists as well.
The law of God also called the Natural Law is unchanging, which is why everything becomes chaos, when the natural law is ignored.
@@poetmaggie1 And this channel (Edit) or RUclips (End Edit) at least hid my comment in favor of truth-speaking and against the Supreme Court's decision which said that it is okay for police to lie.
"The Government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the constitution, the measure of its powers." - Thomas Jefferson (Kentucky Resolutions of 1798)
Cooked
Well stated by Mr. Jefferson. The prevailing opinion that the Supreme Court is the final authority on the Constitution puts the government in charge of defining its own powers. So we are expected to believe that the founders spent that uncomfortable summer in Philadelphia writing up a document that, for all the limitations it supposedly places on government, really means that the governments powers are determined by the government.
@@WildBill99x Thank the tyrant Lincoln for the current situation.
"The War between the States... produced the foundation for the kind of government we have today: consolidated and absolute, based on the unrestrained will of the majority, with force, threats, and intimidation being the order of the day. Today's federal government is considerably at odds with that envisioned by the framers of the Constitution. ... [The War] also laid to rest the great principle enunciated in the Declaration of Independence that 'Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed'." ~ Walter E. Williams
@@tommygunzz8117 Lincoln was a tyrant of the first order.
@@tommygunzz8117 My reply, "And Lincoln was a tyrant of the first order," was censored by people who treat Lincoln as a saint.
Excellent commentary, especially glad to hear the Lochner decision pointed out as a good one.
the divine right of kings just needs a few tweaks to work better for the people.
"The Divine Right of Kings" remains in full force, renamed: "Democracy".
The federal courts have been biased toward big government for a long time. If they were being honest, they would enforce the "equal protection" 14th amendment and require government to treat all citizens/groups equally under the force of law.
The ability of government to discriminate is represented by corporate oligarcy, industriy subsidies, social security, medicare, all welfare programs, forced union membership, foreign aid, the vast majority of government regulations, unequal taxation, and the criminalization of risk (forced vaccines, drug and alchohol laws, gun laws, hate speech laws).
All of these unconstitutional acts turn some into slaves to finance the government and help others with what's left after the former. The power to discriminate is an incentive to corruption because it is worth large bribes and purchased votes. Much of this malfiesant behavior benefits the few at the expense of the many (including future generations).
Is there a debate on what 2+2 equals? Evil wins when that which is certain is lied about as being uncertain.
The problem is the social sciences and the use of game theory.
You're going to hate quantum computers. Those things run on evil.
@@Self-Signed I doubt it. Why do you think so?
@ You know you've reached the pinnacle of libertarian humor when you're explaining it with an LLM:
Quantum superposition
Quantum superposition is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics that allows a quantum system to exist in multiple states simultaneously until it is measured. This principle is distinct from the superposition of classical waves, as it involves probabilities and the wave-like properties of particles.
In quantum superposition, a particle can be described by a linear combination of its possible states. For example, a qubit, the basic unit of quantum information, can be in a superposition of the states ∣0⟩ and ∣1⟩. When measured, the qubit will collapse to one of these states based on the probability amplitudes of the superposition.
The double-slit experiment is a classic demonstration of quantum superposition. When particles like electrons pass through two slits, they create an interference pattern on a screen, indicating that each particle passes through both slits simultaneously and interferes with itself.
Superposition can also be observed in larger systems. Experiments have shown that molecules composed of thousands of atoms can exhibit quantum superposition. For instance, a study published in Nature Physics in 2019 demonstrated interference patterns with molecules consisting of up to 2,000 atoms, which is the heaviest objects to show quantum behavior to date.
In computing, quantum superposition allows quantum computers to process information as qubits, which can exist in a superposition of states, thereby performing multiple calculations at once. This capability is central to the potential power of quantum computing over classical computing.
@Self-Signed Artificial intelligence is ARTIFICIAL. No man-made thing can act as life. In fact, there are wrongs involved with this. A person can be criminally liable if someone is injured because of a booby trap on his property.
What an interesting time to release this video 🤔
There is never a "bad time" to enlighten us on politics, especially rarely discussed aspects.
No way the founders thought, "yeah, we should let anyone join our community going forward - regardless of how incompatable and foreign their culture is to ours and even if the flood us out of control over our own laws."
Let’s just let our bigotry shine bright why don’t we. Like compatibility with culture and “our laws” hasn’t been used before to justify bigotry and exclusion of others. Maybe you shouldn’t be invading and destabilizing other sovereign countries if you’re so concerned about the stability of your own. Unintended consequences are a bitch.
People need the liberal arts rather than focus on the servile arts and positive law. Let’s address the fact that we’re dealing with the social sciences and game theory. How do we understand truth and reality, if we only care about the material goods and services that we use and consume? There’s this never ending battle between positive and natural law in relation to jurisprudence.
*1 of 2. This is how you always should vote worldwide-*
We must fully criticize and _always vote_ *against* (& less authoritarian than) both the Republican *and* Democratic Parties- including *Tim Walz, Kamala Harris,* AOC, all of the squad, Bernie Sanders, Edward Markey, Mark Pocan, the justice democrats, & all other democrats. Vote in every single election- at all levels. And also _endorse or anti-endorse,_ in all elections you can, for outside your voting jurisdiction.
For _all_ public positions. And this same strategy applies against the one or more party-monopolies in _all_ countries worldwide.
Real progressives will never be Democratic Members or Democratic loyalists. Never vote for _any_ Republican member or loyalist either.
If no candidates for a position fit that bill:
-Where _write-ins_ are permissible, always write-in an anti-authoritarian person;
-Where write-ins aren’t permissible, always vote uncommitted or leave the ballot blank.
This will continuously reduce the power of _all_ authoritarian parties in the party monopolies: Until our task is complete.
Repeat strategy for all new authoritarian parties that emerge.
*2 of 2. This is how you always should vote worldwide-*
We must fully criticize and _always vote_ *against* (& less authoritarian than) both the Democratic *and* Republican Parties- including *Trump,* RFK Jr., Vivek Ramaswamy, Rand Paul (He’s _no_ Ron Paul), Thomas Massie, Warren Davidson, Ron Johnson, and all other Republicans. Vote in every single election- at all levels. And also _endorse or anti-endorse,_ in all elections you can, for outside your voting jurisdiction.
For _all_ public positions. And this same strategy applies against the same one or more party-monopolies in _all_ countries worldwide.
Real libertarians will never be Republicans or Republican loyalists. Never vote for _any_ Democratic member or loyalist either.
If no candidates for a position fit that bill:
-Where _write-ins_ are permissible, always write-in an anti-authoritarian person;
-Where write-ins aren’t permissible, always vote uncommitted or leave the ballot blank.
This will continuously reduce the power of _all_ authoritarian parties in the party monopolies: Until our task is complete.
Repeat strategy for all new authoritarian parties that emerge.
We are both anti-authoritarian. Our political advice, strategy, is different. I agree with H.D.Thoreau: "Strike at the root of the problem" to achieve "The govt. that governs best governs NOT at all and when men are ready for it that is the govt. they shall have." So, what is the "root"? It is voluntarism vs. the initiation of deadly threat, respect for reason vs. violence, inalienable rights vs. changing consensus, majority over minority. Since the only politics is authoritarian, to use it is to support it, no matter the tactics. I boycott it.
We need to assume there is no independency at all
See EO #18682 signed in 2014…
So you are in favor of Democracy. It's messy but nothing else is better. All we can hope for is that every decision favors the majority of us. Most right-wing ideas do not do that.
You mean to distract from what’s going on at the Treasury, do you?
ruclips.net/video/F1xAUfdK9FE/видео.htmlsi=2e_acckGATBnGxRn
👎🏻
In fighting among branches of govt. are rare, but welcome because they show each branch, each person, is acting in their own interest, NOT ours. When "we the people" give away our power to an elite we become "we the victims our lazy/cowardice." It is our duty to ourselves to fight for our rights or we will lose them. Ask the Japanese-Americans who didn't fight back.