Common Single-Table design modeling mistakes with DynamoDB

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 фев 2025

Комментарии •

  • @ph2hcom83
    @ph2hcom83 Год назад +9

    The best explanation of the design concept. I can see you must have spent a lot of time and effort to produce such a coherent presentation.

  • @SamKatakouzinos
    @SamKatakouzinos Год назад +3

    Gained lots from this video. I have been watching RUclips videos for DynamoDB.
    Your method of 'Show and Why' went that little bit further of 'Show and Do This Way'.
    Your explanations help me understand why things are done as best practices.

  • @PhillipKerman
    @PhillipKerman Год назад +2

    Great presentation. Practical callouts and commentary added so much to these otherwise familiar concepts.

  • @davidhollenbeck1674
    @davidhollenbeck1674 Год назад

    this is a really great explanation, thanks for taking the time to put it together!

  • @pierreisthebest
    @pierreisthebest Год назад +1

    Thanks Tyler, great talk

  • @manikmudholkar1165
    @manikmudholkar1165 7 месяцев назад

    Interesting way to look at design

  • @harlowk
    @harlowk Год назад

    Tyler is gonna be a leader in this space within the next decade, hear him out!

  • @carlorale
    @carlorale 4 месяца назад

    This is a GEM.

  • @NitinYadav-nv4os
    @NitinYadav-nv4os Год назад

    Great explanation!!
    Do you have plans to make some videos on ElectroDB? especially advanced concepts.

  • @genovo
    @genovo 6 месяцев назад

    Thank you!

  • @IntoTheOverhead
    @IntoTheOverhead 11 месяцев назад

    This was excellent. Thank you Tyler. It's too bad you don't offer modeling services as a freelancer.

  • @fuwa07
    @fuwa07 Год назад

    How would I get all courses that are in building01 and building02 etc

    • @tywalch
      @tywalch  Год назад

      Great question, you can use the `between` sort key operator for that 👍

  • @alshaifhir
    @alshaifhir 10 месяцев назад +1

    This is all very cool. But seems like a lot of contortions and conventions to make up for the absence of things that something like mongo does out of the box with indexes, $lookup, ...

  • @ochirdarmaev8089
    @ochirdarmaev8089 Год назад

    I have a controversy about this design.
    There is too much duplication.
    It forces the use of a unique name. It doesn't allow to use of non-uniq names
    I prefer to use ulid. It keeps unique and ordered.
    ulid ID has date in ID, ulid keeps an ordering

    • @harlowk
      @harlowk Год назад +1

      theres nothing stopping you from building a composite key with timestamps.