It was recorded when I was in 7th standard and now I m in 3rd year but AI was started in 1900s . Sometime I feel that I m so late and backward in this modern era ....😒😒
It's easy to say today If I was born before I would have created Facebook or something else We achieve true success by doing things that others at our present time are not thinking Never feel you are late Every era has it's own emerging technology Just keep thinking how can I use it for solving problems of humanity
Few definitions form my side : 1. “Ability to solve problems of a particular kind rather than a particular problem”. 2. Ability to practice , adapt, and acquire new skill. 3. Ability to use the gained knowledge to rationale about the new situations and old ones. 4. Ability to improve with practice.
Just wondered, this video was filmed 7years ago, which is almost a decade. Now can anyone tell me, what are the aspects/concepts taught here that have been technologically modified/advanced. Can anyone list them?
Currently at 36:36. Things which stood out till now: 1. No mention of 'creativity' as a criteria for intelligence. Neural-networks these days are hinting at the possibility of silicon based 'brains' undermining repetitive-cognitive labor. Creativity seems to be the most safe domain in this regard, far away from any machine learning technique developed till date. 2. No strong views on whether humans are machines. I mean really? At least 1 student should have had the sense to suggest anything on this. It's such a ripe topic for debate! If one considers human decision making as essentially choosing from a random pool of possibilities, with an internal selection mechanism based on the pleasantness of previous experience + familiarity, one can competently make the argument that we are literally stochastic machines following quantitative fitness functions! 3. The teacher was mentioning existentialism, free-will, big name philosophers and the students appeared to be blank. I mean philosophy should be a human right at this point. I'm not saying listen and believe in these 'big name western philosophers' but goddamn, at least some active participation would be nice, especially on the topic of free will, ESPECIALLY from students taking a class on FREAKING AI.
I felt so bad for the Professor! He set up so many great opportunities for interesting discussion, but no one took it. And this is not to place blame on the students. This is a result of how our education system is designed to just produce workers who can follow instructions.
well there are two courses that you can find in the NPTEL youtube channel ruclips.net/p/PLJ5C_6qdAvBG8HP77xIOVxH4Jzq3RQ9dI ruclips.net/p/PLJ5C_6qdAvBGgTiw5ST2zyUvnw7ct6dOR
Rahul R - Mr Deepak is showing the introductions into artificial intelligence through the first 6 lectures, which is necessary to progress. Without understanding the first 6 lectures, a person new to AI will not understand anything after lecture 6.
Yes, Sorry if it came across in the wrong way. Generally there are many people who might have already done some background work, maybe taken Prof Winston's MIT class or Andrew Ng courses etc and want to quickly jump into learning part. The first 6 lectures will definitely open up student to different areas and how to think. I am not suggesting people to skip it.
I have a counter to your opinion, We talk of the word 'awareness' in the universal set available ( I things focused more in the universal set on the area the things relevant at that time) By awareness we mean we come to know something happening around us, machines to come to know about the things happening with them,( also near by the exact topic for e.g.- Amazon chatbot - Alexa is aware of facts that are asked/interacted with her, simultaneously the machine also tries to gather knowledge may be relevant to her for future ) Thus by my argument I conclude Both machines and human tries to gather awareness and try to become aware, I am not telling that all machines have that property of awareness, but the concept of awareness still holds for machines like any other concept of emotion, computation or intelligance. Anything Wrong i said, i encourage replays
I absolutely reject the claim that language itself is unique to humans. Other animals have their languages too, its probably not as sophisticated, but still a language. But that should not matter, because intelligence is not unique to humans either.
if machines are able to think then it shouldnt have been pre-programmed. so as per me, machines are just able to logically interpret the facts fed to it in the form of data.
@@purohitcornercookfoodinsty6387 Our thinking is an automatic function of mind. So, do we have opinions or automatic outputs in the language for a situation are accepted as our opinions.
To be self aware of our thoughts and medium (body) Like if a thing is self aware of his body he will be able to tell that it is him in the mirror Self aware of thoughts means we know that we are thinking. Don't know how but we have already knew this fact that we are thinking and there isn't some answer poping directly. Intelligent beings are kind of philosophers who think of things and concept that can't be seen or feeled like gravity, origin of themselves. For intelligent beings just living isn't all, they seek pleasure, social respect, capable of gaining happiness from sarcasm (jokes)
How does this definition of machine suffice? Machine - Product of additive technology to perform tasks using motion in service of man. Therefore from this definition: Human - not a machine Sword - not a machine Windmill - machine Waterwheel - machine Computer - not a machine Car - machine Apple - not a machine This definition probably is the closest to what people think of as machines, ruling out all biological life in the process. Since with biological life while we can manipulate and understand it we cannot create it from scratch. The idea of additive technology is adding one thing to another to create something more complex, however, a sword isn't a machine even though it is a tool, because it lacks any moving parts and is therefore solely reliant on humans to be used. A computer does not have moving parts, at least now with solid state drives, therefore falls outside of this definition of a machine, though in modern day we can say that almost all machines have computers, the reverse is not true. Hmm so on that basis a computer would be something like... Computer - Product of additive technology to perform computation via the flow of subatomic particles in the service of man. Slight alteration to the Machine definition but it allows us to clearly distinguish between a human, computer, and machine. This difference is likely to be more important rather than less as time progresses, and the average person grows confused with the blurring of lines. The only time that this breaks down at all is when it comes to the human mind emulation problem. But that can be resolved a number of ways when the time comes.
Computer - not a machine NEGATIVE! additive - characterized by, relating to, or produced by addition. In conjunction to this Alan Turing referred to his Turing device AS A MACHINE! Anything that calculates and is operated by a user is a machine, please revise your statement.
Your definition is at best conjecture: but it is not what computer scientists would define as not a machine: A computer computes data - it is in it's own name if you are however referring to a Computer as a job role then yes: it is not a machine, but in general, a device that uses components to make calculations whether it is algorithmic or mechanical switches that act like a calculator are one in the same. If it has a switch it's a machine. Several Computer Scientists will back up that attaching emotions to a machine does not make it "not a machine" lol.
shashank kurapati It doesn't have any but general prerequisites for AI is Probability theory, Linear Algebra, Introduction to algorithms and some more(advanced)
It has lot to do with the present day society. Today's students find classroom teaching obsolete as they can learn a lot through internet. They can just google their petty subject doubts without worrying about the embarrassment they would have faced instead if they had asked the same in the class. Had there been no internet, students would have surely interacted well with the lecturer as he/she would have been the only source for clarifying their doubts.
The problem is half to do with society and half to do with it involving philosophy: it's too open ended. Students would rather it be proven in fact rather that speculation: if it's just opinion based then they know their answer doesn't matter. Think about it - why do you think so few students pick philosophy as their major despite it being impossible to seek a career in? Most of what you think Philosophy is is just conjecture: it serves no true purpose other than understanding how a person may conclude a narrative, whether it is right or wrong is meaningless!
As much as I appreciate the nuances of thinking ai is exactly the same as the human mind it is not. A Human has to worry about their bills, their temperature, their energy, outside factor can influence a decision. An Ai is fed an algorithm and based on patterns it picks the most ideal solution based on what it was taught to answer - several hundred tests later it can make more accurate measurements based on HUMAN validation. To say they are similar is foolish, there are clear differences I don't need a degree in Philosophy to tell you the two minds are nothing alike. Human thought is more natural, more flexible and KNOWS the environment - an ai has to be taught so to think the same and even that isn't thought: it's just mathematics.
Until I see a robot demonstrate feeling, demonstrate wants and demonstrate a drive to succeed beyond what the numbers tell them to me, they are still not independent beings and therefore I can't claim they are exactly like us - you may try and say chatbots demonstrate this: but again, these are just pre-programmed responses that are stored, mathematics: not thought.
you are asking too many questions to all students and If any student gives you answers you are proving them wrong but still, you are not giving any satisfiable answers.Are you teaching or just asking and asking........and reading out
he is pointing out inconsistencies in their answers this honestly lets people try and understand the thought processes put into it while making the subject called "AI" so i would honestly appreciate my lecturers doing it to us
It was recorded when I was in 7th standard and now I m in 3rd year but AI was started in 1900s . Sometime I feel that I m so late and backward in this modern era ....😒😒
Which college you are in??
It's easy to say today
If I was born before I would have created Facebook or something else
We achieve true success by doing things that others at our present time are not thinking
Never feel you are late
Every era has it's own emerging technology
Just keep thinking how can I use it for solving problems of humanity
Prof. Deepal Khemani hats-off to you. The series of lecture are brilliant
Yes, great
Very interesting lecture. Also very happy to see someone teaching / presenting AI this way! India needs more teachers like him.
Few definitions form my side :
1. “Ability to solve problems of a particular kind rather than a particular problem”.
2. Ability to practice , adapt, and acquire new skill.
3. Ability to use the gained knowledge to rationale about the new situations and old ones.
4. Ability to improve with practice.
All are same bro
If class would have been interactive. This lecture would have been awesome.
@35:00 Prof. Deepak Khemani shows his ingenious level of sarcasm.
@38:41 he gives scintific explenation of emotios.
Just wondered, this video was filmed 7years ago, which is almost a decade.
Now can anyone tell me, what are the aspects/concepts taught here that have been technologically modified/advanced.
Can anyone list them?
45:54 sarcasm at its peak on ethical behaviour of human.
This playlist is half of my age.. This Folks dolook were very simple back then though it's a decade ago.🙌
The moment he asked what is a machine, we all had a collective flashback of a certain movie.
Even the girl told same definition
Any thing which reduces human effort
3 idiot
3 ideots ❤
is there slides available on swamyam
@@hiiii639
😂
Human beings not optimizers
We're satisfiers
Mental faculties
Currently at 36:36. Things which stood out till now:
1. No mention of 'creativity' as a criteria for intelligence. Neural-networks these days are hinting at the possibility of silicon based 'brains' undermining repetitive-cognitive labor. Creativity seems to be the most safe domain in this regard, far away from any machine learning technique developed till date.
2. No strong views on whether humans are machines. I mean really? At least 1 student should have had the sense to suggest anything on this. It's such a ripe topic for debate! If one considers human decision making as essentially choosing from a random pool of possibilities, with an internal selection mechanism based on the pleasantness of previous experience + familiarity, one can competently make the argument that we are literally stochastic machines following quantitative fitness functions!
3. The teacher was mentioning existentialism, free-will, big name philosophers and the students appeared to be blank. I mean philosophy should be a human right at this point. I'm not saying listen and believe in these 'big name western philosophers' but goddamn, at least some active participation would be nice, especially on the topic of free will, ESPECIALLY from students taking a class on FREAKING AI.
I felt so bad for the Professor! He set up so many great opportunities for interesting discussion, but no one took it.
And this is not to place blame on the students. This is a result of how our education system is designed to just produce workers who can follow instructions.
Is the "next semester" continuation course which he talks about uploaded to this channel?
ruclips.net/p/PLjzjdo8qdH03pdpQF0qBSeG1pooNhFyM8
well there are two courses that you can find in the NPTEL youtube channel
ruclips.net/p/PLJ5C_6qdAvBG8HP77xIOVxH4Jzq3RQ9dI
ruclips.net/p/PLJ5C_6qdAvBGgTiw5ST2zyUvnw7ct6dOR
essentially ^ infinity
Satyendra Yadav और बिरादर
Machine is assembled system to which produces output when an input is given.
What if a NULL is passed in a programming software installed in machine
So damn beautiful lecture.. ❤
Lectures really starts at Mod-01 Lec-06
thank you!
Rahul R - Mr Deepak is showing the introductions into artificial intelligence through the first 6 lectures, which is necessary to progress. Without understanding the first 6 lectures, a person new to AI will not understand anything after lecture 6.
instead of group cant we create gmail groups???
Yes, Sorry if it came across in the wrong way. Generally there are many people who might have already done some background work, maybe taken Prof Winston's MIT class or Andrew Ng courses etc and want to quickly jump into learning part. The first 6 lectures will definitely open up student to different areas and how to think. I am not suggesting people to skip it.
is this subject is elated to electronics does it has any scope in it?
we have Chatgpt,gemini etc nowadays so can we say machines are intelligent or will be intelligent in coming years?
Machine is a kinematic chain in the sense that desired output is obtained with the given output
No one said about 'awareness' which is missing in machines.
I have a counter to your opinion,
We talk of the word 'awareness' in the universal set available ( I things focused more in the universal set on the area the things relevant at that time)
By awareness we mean we come to know something happening around us, machines to come to know about the things happening with them,( also near by the exact topic for e.g.- Amazon chatbot - Alexa is aware of facts that are asked/interacted with her, simultaneously the machine also tries to gather knowledge may be relevant to her for future )
Thus by my argument I conclude Both machines and human tries to gather awareness and try to become aware,
I am not telling that all machines have that property of awareness, but the concept of awareness still holds for machines like any other concept of emotion, computation or intelligance.
Anything Wrong i said, i encourage replays
very nice video. thanks a lot Sir
Intelligence is finding the best solution. But thinking can include best or good or worst solution.
Not always. In fact, intelligence is all about imperfection and moving on. :-)
18:00 1NT33LL1G3NC3 15 TH3 4B1L1TY TO 4D4PT TO CH4NG3
I absolutely reject the claim that language itself is unique to humans. Other animals have their languages too, its probably not as sophisticated, but still a language. But that should not matter, because intelligence is not unique to humans either.
if machines are able to think then it shouldnt have been pre-programmed. so as per me, machines are just able to logically interpret the facts fed to it in the form of data.
Even humans learn from facts, Shall we call them machines?
But they have their own opinion
@@purohitcornercookfoodinsty6387 Our thinking is an automatic function of mind. So, do we have opinions or automatic outputs in the language for a situation are accepted as our opinions.
Dinkar Kumar I think our thoughts are not free but outputs of neuronal programming.
Very nice lecture
Machine doesn't think it produces the report or make decision on analysis of previous records according to me
To be self aware of our thoughts and medium (body)
Like if a thing is self aware of his body he will be able to tell that it is him in the mirror
Self aware of thoughts means we know that we are thinking. Don't know how but we have already knew this fact that we are thinking and there isn't some answer poping directly.
Intelligent beings are kind of philosophers who think of things and concept that can't be seen or feeled like gravity, origin of themselves.
For intelligent beings just living isn't all, they seek pleasure, social respect, capable of gaining happiness from sarcasm (jokes)
interesting prof. :D
Right teaching analysis
A machine which understand that what it is doing..
27:31
3 idiots scene
😂😂
Every time Deepak says "essentially" give me a Rupee.
We are advance version of machine
Work under set of rules
47:10 YES
How does this definition of machine suffice?
Machine - Product of additive technology to perform tasks using motion in service of man.
Therefore from this definition:
Human - not a machine
Sword - not a machine
Windmill - machine
Waterwheel - machine
Computer - not a machine
Car - machine
Apple - not a machine
This definition probably is the closest to what people think of as machines, ruling out all biological life in the process. Since with biological life while we can manipulate and understand it we cannot create it from scratch. The idea of additive technology is adding one thing to another to create something more complex, however, a sword isn't a machine even though it is a tool, because it lacks any moving parts and is therefore solely reliant on humans to be used. A computer does not have moving parts, at least now with solid state drives, therefore falls outside of this definition of a machine, though in modern day we can say that almost all machines have computers, the reverse is not true.
Hmm so on that basis a computer would be something like...
Computer - Product of additive technology to perform computation via the flow of subatomic particles in the service of man.
Slight alteration to the Machine definition but it allows us to clearly distinguish between a human, computer, and machine. This difference is likely to be more important rather than less as time progresses, and the average person grows confused with the blurring of lines. The only time that this breaks down at all is when it comes to the human mind emulation problem. But that can be resolved a number of ways when the time comes.
Computer - not a machine
NEGATIVE!
additive - characterized by, relating to, or produced by addition.
In conjunction to this Alan Turing referred to his Turing device AS A MACHINE! Anything that calculates and is operated by a user is a machine, please revise your statement.
Your definition is at best conjecture: but it is not what computer scientists would define as not a machine:
A computer computes data - it is in it's own name if you are however referring to a Computer as a job role then yes: it is not a machine, but in general, a device that uses components to make calculations whether it is algorithmic or mechanical switches that act like a calculator are one in the same. If it has a switch it's a machine.
Several Computer Scientists will back up that attaching emotions to a machine does not make it "not a machine" lol.
what are the prerequisites to learn this course?
shashank kurapati It doesn't have any but general prerequisites for AI is Probability theory, Linear Algebra, Introduction to algorithms and some more(advanced)
common sense
@@AbhishekSinghSambyal Thank you for comments.
Time and Patience.
Thank you sir
no because design visual important ( eyes did not lie)
It's was painful to watch how little the students talked.
+no thats the problem with India
It has lot to do with the present day society. Today's students find classroom teaching obsolete as they can learn a lot through internet. They can just google their petty subject doubts without worrying about the embarrassment they would have faced instead if they had asked the same in the class. Had there been no internet, students would have surely interacted well with the lecturer as he/she would have been the only source for clarifying their doubts.
The problem is half to do with society and half to do with it involving philosophy: it's too open ended. Students would rather it be proven in fact rather that speculation: if it's just opinion based then they know their answer doesn't matter.
Think about it - why do you think so few students pick philosophy as their major despite it being impossible to seek a career in? Most of what you think Philosophy is is just conjecture: it serves no true purpose other than understanding how a person may conclude a narrative, whether it is right or wrong is meaningless!
they myt have been instructed to keep quiet most of the time bcz this session was made only for shooting purpose
Why don't the professors write in boards and teach...
essentially
27:31 admission through famous Indian reservation system
so bramins are intelligent?
just learn reservation well its not about seats its about participation but in india cast base reservation which is not fair in any case
how quickly you judge someone ... that's awesome !
Don't hope much frm pakistani bot
@@shresta1527 I just feel bad for the sincere taxpayers of India
As much as I appreciate the nuances of thinking ai is exactly the same as the human mind it is not. A Human has to worry about their bills, their temperature, their energy, outside factor can influence a decision. An Ai is fed an algorithm and based on patterns it picks the most ideal solution based on what it was taught to answer - several hundred tests later it can make more accurate measurements based on HUMAN validation. To say they are similar is foolish, there are clear differences I don't need a degree in Philosophy to tell you the two minds are nothing alike. Human thought is more natural, more flexible and KNOWS the environment - an ai has to be taught so to think the same and even that isn't thought: it's just mathematics.
Until I see a robot demonstrate feeling, demonstrate wants and demonstrate a drive to succeed beyond what the numbers tell them to me, they are still not independent beings and therefore I can't claim they are exactly like us - you may try and say chatbots demonstrate this: but again, these are just pre-programmed responses that are stored, mathematics: not thought.
I like your writing Sir
Machine- it takes input and gives output ..... Generalized definition of machine. Why these students can't answer such simple question?
you are asking too many questions to all students and If any student gives you answers you are proving them wrong but still, you are not giving any satisfiable answers.Are you teaching or just asking and asking........and reading out
he is pointing out inconsistencies in their answers
this honestly lets people try and understand the thought processes put into it while making the subject called "AI" so i would honestly appreciate my lecturers doing it to us
Teaching is about asking and asking either by student or teacher
Pakistannn