I'm really glad I clicked on your channel after reading your name, and feeling like your comment was really relatable :3 Because it's always nice to see another trans person
@@InsanityPrevails glad you liked my channel, the only downside it's that it's in Spanish, the majority of my public are from south America, specifically Argentina but I can talk in English just fine as you see c:
There's a great 4K Textures Mod, that really brings FC3 closer to modern standards. I bought this game upon release, not having played the previous 2, and loved it. I went back and played 1 & 2 and have purchased each new FC release. As always, great video!
Back when Ubisoft could make excellent games. I remember playing the PS3 version at 20-28 FPS. I went back to it on my RTX 4080, and the difference is staggering.
I watched the let's play series of Far Cry 6 on "Jingles" channel when that was released. I couldn't believe how the story went from Far Cry 3, to that POS.
to be fair you could propably count the games that run at a stable 30 fps on the ps3 and 360 on two hands! i would bet my ass off of there are significantly more stable 60 fps games on them than 30 fps games!
Most of the games I play these days are all from before 2016. Only 3 or so games are from after 2016. More recent games just don't seem to interest me.
@@StefanoLambelet There are still good games being made, is just that is one or two every two years, its not like that era from 2007 to 2012 when every single year was mega stacked. 2009 we get AC2, Modern Warfare 2, Arkham Asylum, Uncharted 2, Bayonetta 1, gta EFLC just so that the next year in 2010 we get RDR1, Mass Effect 2, God of War 3, Halo Reach, Metro 2033, Fallout New Vegas, CoD BO1, Bioshock 2 and Mafia 2. Then in 2011 we get Uncharted 3, Witcher 2, Skyrim, Portal 2 and Arkham City. All of the most historical and incredible franchise of gaming that are still feeding the industry today...all born between 2007 and 2012. You can get a great game like RDR2 in 2018 and then a few years later an Elden Ring, it happens, but years are a lot more calm, the days of getting a bunch of hyper-mega goated brand new franchise every single year is definitely behind us.
Far Cry 3, 4 and 5 are an absolutely fantastic run of great games. I've just finished a 4 run through and started a 5 having not played either for years.
Yeah, I love FC3, FC 4 is cool but too similar, and FC5 I love the map and all, and FC6 .... I'm happy to not bought it (free with my CPU), it's too much, not good, I finished it but with not much fun. FC2 is cool for the concept but sometimes boring, and FC1 was not Ubisoft and not same formula, but insane.
@@NineS5 Primal is good, not the best but his era is cool, 5 is one of my favorite of the franchise, ND est ok if you want more FC, and 6 is ... not good at all.
@@NineS5 I played 2 but hated how it looked, everything was just so brown and drab compared to the first one and I hated having malaria or something that needed constant attention.
it's still such a crime that FC3 Classic on PS4 was 30fps and that it's STILL not 60fps on PS5, even though it can be enabled with a few lines of code on a jailbroken PS4
With the sad state of gaming in recent years, we’re seeing great opportunity to replay or play some older titles which came from the greatest gaming era pre-Covid to the 2010’s or so. It’s great to see that an entry level modern GPU can handle these title’s extremely well at 1440p and 4K at high / ultra settings with 60+ fps easily 💪🥳😇👍🥰
Is the Ambient occlusion screwed up? The game almost looks cell shaded when looking at edges of the grass. Must be some "modern hardware/old software" issue. Never noticed it when I last played the game.
SSAO and most AO options in this game is hideous. It comes from CryEngine which was the base for Far Cry. (Name isn't a coincidence it was a crytek game)
I finally scratched this off my backlog last year. Next stop is Blood Dragon. I don't have any Far Cry titles beyond that but Ubisoft clearly doesn't want any of my money ever again, so I'm okay with that.
I remember playing this on a 1gb ati hd4350, on the 1024*768 or 800*600 resolution, yeah the fps wasn't the best but when I was like 12yo i didn't care and actually enjoyed the game
I would give this another test if i was you with lossless frame generation, It's on steam for £5.70 and does a great job with old and news games on all gfx cards for that extra performance 😉
@@RandomGaminginHD Your very welcome, Digital Foundary did a video explanation comparison on it all, If interested 🤗 , It does support fullscreen and gsync, If it scales bit big on the game, Just tab out, Then back in and reset the boderless fullscreen to fullscreen if your using fullscreen, I have to do this, When using it on Rdo, But man it's really smooth.
I remember playing this on a PS3, those were the days. I only found out the frame rate on that console was horrible years later cause I never really noticed the frame rate at the time
All the sequels were so different than the original Far Cry, completely different developers as well, Crytek had nothing to do with all the later Far Cry games.
I played this on ps3 and 360 first. Even the ps4 pro version (equivalent to high settings on pc at 1440p) running at an actual stable 30 fps was a massive upgrade. You could hear those poor old consoles screaming.
i used to run this game at 720p, with high settings and 60 fps on my old 9800 gt. with a i5 2500k@4ghz and 4 gb ddr3. i felt like the king of the world back then, haha good times
I spanked far cry 3 on the playstation back in the day. its literally the ONLY game i platinum'd as it was so good. played on warrior difficulty. i did try and move over to my pc at the time (fx8350/R9 380) but I couldnt quite get the 1080p/60 high i wanted. I might re-download it on this machine (4770/RX580) or my next build (R5 1600/1070Ti)
Maybe try going a little higher for the next build. I don't think that 1070ti is a huge upgrade over RX 580. If I was you I'd save a little more and get Ryzen 5 5500 and RX 6600 at the minimum. Even that won't be able to max out every game at 1080p but it would still provide a decent experience for a reasonable amount of money.
@@MarkoVuckovic32 the 1070Ti is huge improvement over the 580 (around 80% on Userbenchmark) the 1070ti machine is built. my intention was to flip the Ryzen1600/1070ti build, but it makes more sense for me to keep it and move on the 4770 build, as AM4 has some upgradeability and Windows 11 compatibillity. 1080P/60 is enough for me.
@@kingarthur83rd the difference is definitely bigger than I expected it to be but still you upgraded from a 2017 GPU to another 2017 GPU. I still believe you could have gotten something even better.
ah yes. facrcry 3! absolute classic. very valid to say the "waste some hours" and have fun. or too many (yes i have like 1700 hours on it..don't ask why lol) best of the whole series. looked great back in its day and still looks great till today. well worth playing
Calling one of the most dangerous birds to exist friendly is just something but yeah Far Cry 3 is such a great game that Ubisoft remade it 3 more times after that all in different locations and settings but its just the same game over and over again.
@@RandomGaminginHD i liked them that much i got dead space 1 2 and 3 plus evil within 1 and 2 plus on amazon i paid 15pound for far cry 3, 5 and new dawn plus all of the DLC's for 5! its like 6 games for 15pound! the 1 where ur a red neck and you end up on mars is really funny plus they play loads better on pc when you have a rx 7800 xt lol
I bought far cry on the original xbox 2 years ago and it never worked because it was scratched and resurfaced many times, but i paid 8 bucks for it and I still want a refund or for it to magically work, I did enjoy far cry 3 and 4
Turning off SMT using process lasso gave me an extra 50fps. I also managed to get dxvk working with it but it crashes if you use rtss overlay so I couldn't really tell if it was an improvement.
Ah, the venerable 14900k and DDR5 6400. I bet that helped quite a bit too. LOL! Can you redo this on your i5 12400f? And what is stopping you from slapping your i5 12400f in that machine for DDR5 testing?
I played the game to completion on my PS3 Slim, when the game was brand new. I loved it to bits. But the last few hours were a chore. The last island felt a bit meh. The missions where you were the gunner (last island) were unbelievably slow on the PS3. It was a pain. By the time I finished the game I didn't want to touch it or any other new Far Cry game. Till this day. I was a fan of Far Cry 2 which I also completed (PC), but Far Cry 3 as good as it was, made me not want to play more. Same with Borderlands. I played the first game to completion (PC), but the last couple of hours I couldn't wait for the game to end. After which I barely tried Borderlands 2 when that came out, for a couple of hours but I already knew, I can't play Borderlands any more. It burned me out. Which is weird as there are games which I have played for thousands of hours. (gamer since Pac-Man was new in the arcades). As for the RTX 4060, I am not surprised it did so well. I never had one, but I always thought it was a good card even though the cool thing is to blast it. I guess I was never cool.
But... Can it run Crysis 2007??? Crysis Remastered with ever so slightly lower settings and RT off would also be interesting to see at 4K as it's visuals are pretty much identical (on the condition that one uses optimized graphical settings)
@@kupokinzyt well yeah but fsr is doing very good, the fsr frame gen is on par if not even better than dlss frame generation, but intel XESS is the closest to dlss right now
It's a bit cheaper and very slightly more powerful on average, and FSR isn't that much behind DLSS nowadays. Honestly, not much of a difference, unless you were playing to run AI on it or something.
depends on your cpu, if you have i9-14900k and play it on 760 you will have better framerate than i3-10300f with 4090, the game is really CPU bottlenecked, they should update both fc3 and fc4 to utilize more than 2 cores.... to get best fps you better use only the best 2-4 cpu cores with process lasso for that game
@@krowan477 i never recalled something like i3 10300f lol, they don't have f series in those cpu 😅 I think you don't need i9 to play old games, even my i3 11th gen laptop with IGPU can run this game at medium-high in 768p. So i expect this game runs great even at i3 12100f + RTX 3050 6GB.
That was Pirate Cove, not outpost. Far Cry 3 was the best, Far Cry 4 is like DLC for Far Cry 3. I remember waiting till midnight at Game to get shiny, new copy of Far Cry 3. Actually, game looks great even today.
when I was played it decade ago, it was good looking game, with realistic-ish design , but poor physics and low destruction. now it still looks good, but I'd rather tell the design is more cartoon than realistic, almost look like borderlands
yeahj far cry 3 .... i remember playing it on my old athlon64x2 3800+ 9400gt and 2gb ram(than i upgraded to 3gb ) it ran at likle 30someting fps low settings probably 800x600 but here i am in 2024 i play it on winxp pc i7 3770 4gb ram 650ti 1g-this is my windows retro pc xp windows /10dualboot 480gb ssd
I remember the days when I played this game with an Intel hd 4000 at 18 fps xD
I used an a4 3300 and igpu so not much better haha
same lol
I'm really glad I clicked on your channel after reading your name, and feeling like your comment was really relatable :3 Because it's always nice to see another trans person
@@InsanityPrevails glad you liked my channel, the only downside it's that it's in Spanish, the majority of my public are from south America, specifically Argentina but I can talk in English just fine as you see c:
I did too lol
I remember being pleasantly suprised at how well this game ran on my gt630m laptop back in 2013
There's a great 4K Textures Mod, that really brings FC3 closer to modern standards. I bought this game upon release, not having played the previous 2, and loved it. I went back and played 1 & 2 and have purchased each new FC release. As always, great video!
Where do you get this mod?
@@jponz85muds mod from nexusmods
The texture mod in 30 Days mod doesn’t work with Dx11. Which mod did you use?
Back when Ubisoft could make excellent games. I remember playing the PS3 version at 20-28 FPS. I went back to it on my RTX 4080, and the difference is staggering.
I watched the let's play series of Far Cry 6 on "Jingles" channel when that was released. I couldn't believe how the story went from Far Cry 3, to that POS.
@@TrusteftTech exactly
Played this on the PS3 when it came out - ran at a blazingly fast framrate of 15-25 fps
to be fair you could propably count the games that run at a stable 30 fps on the ps3 and 360 on two hands! i would bet my ass off of there are significantly more stable 60 fps games on them than 30 fps games!
I wana relive 1990s to 2010, when I looked forward to new games
Long time ago now 😭
This game is 12 years old now 😥
Most of the games I play these days are all from before 2016. Only 3 or so games are from after 2016. More recent games just don't seem to interest me.
@@StefanoLambelet
There are still good games being made, is just that is one or two every two years, its not like that era from 2007 to 2012 when every single year was mega stacked.
2009 we get AC2, Modern Warfare 2, Arkham Asylum, Uncharted 2, Bayonetta 1, gta EFLC just so that the next year in 2010 we get RDR1, Mass Effect 2, God of War 3, Halo Reach, Metro 2033, Fallout New Vegas, CoD BO1, Bioshock 2 and Mafia 2.
Then in 2011 we get Uncharted 3, Witcher 2, Skyrim, Portal 2 and Arkham City.
All of the most historical and incredible franchise of gaming that are still feeding the industry today...all born between 2007 and 2012.
You can get a great game like RDR2 in 2018 and then a few years later an Elden Ring, it happens, but years are a lot more calm, the days of getting a bunch of hyper-mega goated brand new franchise every single year is definitely behind us.
Perfect. I was hoping for a video of almost exactly this setup
The chilled nature of your videos coupled with the extreme violence of the gameplay is an addictive mixture.
4:43 those are Cassowaries, among the most aggressive and territorial birds in the world
I remember running FC3 on my GT 430 in 2012 and being impressed with how well it looked and ran.
2.3gb vram usage, no Ray Tracing, no dlss or fsr on xess, or frame generation and the game looks amazing, games back then were made properly 😃
Far Cry 3, 4 and 5 are an absolutely fantastic run of great games. I've just finished a 4 run through and started a 5 having not played either for years.
Yeah, I love FC3, FC 4 is cool but too similar, and FC5 I love the map and all, and FC6 .... I'm happy to not bought it (free with my CPU), it's too much, not good, I finished it but with not much fun. FC2 is cool for the concept but sometimes boring, and FC1 was not Ubisoft and not same formula, but insane.
Honestly I thought that 4 was a better game overall and just didn’t hit as hard bc of how similar to 3 it was.
@@NineS5 Primal is good, not the best but his era is cool, 5 is one of my favorite of the franchise, ND est ok if you want more FC, and 6 is ... not good at all.
@@NineS5 I played 2 but hated how it looked, everything was just so brown and drab compared to the first one and I hated having malaria or something that needed constant attention.
Only FC3 and 4 are good
it's still such a crime that FC3 Classic on PS4 was 30fps and that it's STILL not 60fps on PS5, even though it can be enabled with a few lines of code on a jailbroken PS4
With the sad state of gaming in recent years, we’re seeing great opportunity to replay or play some older titles which came from the greatest gaming era pre-Covid to the 2010’s or so. It’s great to see that an entry level modern GPU can handle these title’s extremely well at 1440p and 4K at high / ultra settings with 60+ fps easily 💪🥳😇👍🥰
What a coincidence.
I actually started playing FC3 yesterday.
Nice video between mate.
Is the Ambient occlusion screwed up? The game almost looks cell shaded when looking at edges of the grass. Must be some "modern hardware/old software" issue. Never noticed it when I last played the game.
Gpu drivers are getting better and worse
AO was always broken in this game
The AO has always looked like that. Looks pretty bad as it's always been my complaint about this game's use of SSAO and HBAO
It was always this way, choose *HDAO* instead of *HBAO* in: VIDEO -> SSAO METHOD -> HDAO an the problem is solved.
SSAO and most AO options in this game is hideous. It comes from CryEngine which was the base for Far Cry.
(Name isn't a coincidence it was a crytek game)
Remember finishing this the first time with a heavily overclocked GTX 470. How time flies.
I played this game in my Intel HD 3000 back in the day, like 35-26 fps at 800x600
one of the best times in my life
I finally scratched this off my backlog last year. Next stop is Blood Dragon. I don't have any Far Cry titles beyond that but Ubisoft clearly doesn't want any of my money ever again, so I'm okay with that.
This has been one of the best gaming experiences of my life at 720P Medium settings on my trusty old GT 620M laptop.
Random gaming in HD, never gets old
We gotta make due when modern gaming is in the state it is lol
The CPU and GPU power draw being matched 110w-120w the entire video was oddly zen like.
i played this game when i had a gtx 660 it looked so good for its time and still holds up today
Great game. Such a brilliant game, Ubisoft decided to continuously reuse the formula even as recent as Far Cry 6.
Great video, as usual, but there are the system monitoring seems too blury for me. Please, try to increase encoding bitrate or something next time.
i remember playing this in 2013 with potato laptop, it was the first fps story game i've ever finished
Some people need 3rd person driving IRL.
Blood Dragon would forever be the best Far Cry. It get repetitive and boring after a few hours but it's a gem for the atmosphere alone
Tbf the game only takes around 4hrs to complete but I agree it's amazing.
The thing I hate about far cry is the first person driving, it just confuses me sometimes, you can see why cyberpunk 2077 got the third person cam
halo ce on the caveman walls got that correct
@@dave7474 oh hell yeah
@@Justachamp772 its just more fun! you get to see the mayhem around you better too
The first ever game that got me hooked on Steam.
One of my favs
I still remember running this on the integrated graphics on my dual core intel laptop cpu.
Ahhh Far Cry 3... The game that started it all
I remember playing this on a 1gb ati hd4350, on the 1024*768 or 800*600 resolution, yeah the fps wasn't the best but when I was like 12yo i didn't care and actually enjoyed the game
i remember have a 660gtx when i played this game and it ran smooth as butter.
Poor RGHD, how do you get punished by a cassowary?🤣
I forgot all about their ways haha
For older Ubisoft games, you may have to turn off a few cores (or many if you have a really good CPU) for significantly better performance
I would give this another test if i was you with lossless frame generation, It's on steam for £5.70 and does a great job with old and news games on all gfx cards for that extra performance 😉
I’ll have to try that, thanks
@@RandomGaminginHD Your very welcome, Digital Foundary did a video explanation comparison on it all, If interested 🤗 , It does support fullscreen and gsync, If it scales bit big on the game, Just tab out, Then back in and reset the boderless fullscreen to fullscreen if your using fullscreen, I have to do this, When using it on Rdo, But man it's really smooth.
My favourite part on this game was when you torched the weed field with the flamethrower.
This game is 12 years old now 😥 i remember playing it when i was little 😢
I remember playing this on a PS3, those were the days. I only found out the frame rate on that console was horrible years later cause I never really noticed the frame rate at the time
This has been in my backlog for 10 years now. Shameful.
It’s well worth a play even today :)
remember playing this on x360. It was awesome.
All the sequels were so different than the original Far Cry, completely different developers as well, Crytek had nothing to do with all the later Far Cry games.
I only enjoyed the 1st Far Cry (and the 3rd because it was the closest of all the games to the 1st one).
First Crysis was much closer to original Far Cry compared to Far Cry 2.
@@MarkoVuckovic32 Because Far Cry was a base for them to work on and test the cryengine to then release Crysis.
@@psychoalert1823 ok that makes sense but why did Ubisoft decide to make Far Cry 2 themselves?
@@MarkoVuckovic32 Because they probably thought it would make a great series and therefore bought the Far Cry rights.
I played this on ps3 and 360 first. Even the ps4 pro version (equivalent to high settings on pc at 1440p) running at an actual stable 30 fps was a massive upgrade. You could hear those poor old consoles screaming.
i used to run this game at 720p, with high settings and 60 fps on my old 9800 gt.
with a i5 2500k@4ghz and 4 gb ddr3.
i felt like the king of the world back then, haha good times
Calling them mainstream cards instead of budget cards makes so much more sense... 🔥
Post FX in this game is so heavy for no reason lol
PLEASE make a lets play type of video i would watch it
Test Crysis 1-2 & 3 :)
Great video as always could you do a test for the best old/budget gpu to use on warzone many thanks
can't wait for the RTS 5060
GTX 460 1GB, playing this at around 30fps on High at 1080p I loved this game.
"I don't think they are the enemy. They are now" lol
I spanked far cry 3 on the playstation back in the day. its literally the ONLY game i platinum'd as it was so good.
played on warrior difficulty. i did try and move over to my pc at the time (fx8350/R9 380) but I couldnt quite get the 1080p/60 high i wanted. I might re-download it on this machine (4770/RX580) or my next build (R5 1600/1070Ti)
I remember having to play splitscreen coop to get the platinum
Maybe try going a little higher for the next build. I don't think that 1070ti is a huge upgrade over RX 580. If I was you I'd save a little more and get Ryzen 5 5500 and RX 6600 at the minimum. Even that won't be able to max out every game at 1080p but it would still provide a decent experience for a reasonable amount of money.
@@MarkoVuckovic32 the 1070Ti is huge improvement over the 580 (around 80% on Userbenchmark) the 1070ti machine is built. my intention was to flip the Ryzen1600/1070ti build, but it makes more sense for me to keep it and move on the 4770 build, as AM4 has some upgradeability and Windows 11 compatibillity.
1080P/60 is enough for me.
@@kingarthur83rd the difference is definitely bigger than I expected it to be but still you upgraded from a 2017 GPU to another 2017 GPU. I still believe you could have gotten something even better.
AMD AM2-3000 processor, 4gb ram, Geforce 460, I think it was a 1gb version. Good times! :D
This means that it'll run on my mobile 4060 at a locked 60/2160p. Nice.
The fov in vehicles becomes so narrow, makes you feel like wearing horse blinders
Wow. you can get a locked 60 fps in 2160p. That is impressive.
Enemies: Wait is this guy our enemy? Because the guerillas are shooting at him too..
Remind me not to ask for a lift
ah yes. facrcry 3! absolute classic. very valid to say the "waste some hours" and have fun. or too many (yes i have like 1700 hours on it..don't ask why lol) best of the whole series. looked great back in its day and still looks great till today. well worth playing
Damn i remembered this game looking better even tho i played on medium/low on my gt 730 lmao
Calling one of the most dangerous birds to exist friendly is just something but yeah Far Cry 3 is such a great game that Ubisoft remade it 3 more times after that all in different locations and settings but its just the same game over and over again.
far cry 3 the goat 🗣️🔥🔥
It is still a pretty good looking game to be honest, But that gameplay from you, so professional....🤣🤣
far cry 3, dead space and evil within were the best games on the xbox 360
Classic era
@@RandomGaminginHD i liked them that much i got dead space 1 2 and 3 plus evil within 1 and 2 plus on amazon i paid 15pound for far cry 3, 5 and new dawn plus all of the DLC's for 5! its like 6 games for 15pound! the 1 where ur a red neck and you end up on mars is really funny plus they play loads better on pc when you have a rx 7800 xt lol
We used to have a proper game industry.
You should've tried Far Cry 4 which is the peak in terms of graphical fidelity in the entire far cry series.
Any way to enable a better field of depth without mods?
I bought far cry on the original xbox 2 years ago and it never worked because it was scratched and resurfaced many times, but i paid 8 bucks for it and I still want a refund or for it to magically work, I did enjoy far cry 3 and 4
I would like to see how rtx4060 vs rtx3060ti goes in great "old" games at 4k or / and 120fps.
I ran a GTX 760 when I played this first
Turning off SMT using process lasso gave me an extra 50fps. I also managed to get dxvk working with it but it crashes if you use rtss overlay so I couldn't really tell if it was an improvement.
Ah, the venerable 14900k and DDR5 6400. I bet that helped quite a bit too. LOL! Can you redo this on your i5 12400f? And what is stopping you from slapping your i5 12400f in that machine for DDR5 testing?
I played the game to completion on my PS3 Slim, when the game was brand new. I loved it to bits. But the last few hours were a chore. The last island felt a bit meh. The missions where you were the gunner (last island) were unbelievably slow on the PS3. It was a pain.
By the time I finished the game I didn't want to touch it or any other new Far Cry game. Till this day. I was a fan of Far Cry 2 which I also completed (PC), but Far Cry 3 as good as it was, made me not want to play more.
Same with Borderlands. I played the first game to completion (PC), but the last couple of hours I couldn't wait for the game to end. After which I barely tried Borderlands 2 when that came out, for a couple of hours but I already knew, I can't play Borderlands any more. It burned me out.
Which is weird as there are games which I have played for thousands of hours. (gamer since Pac-Man was new in the arcades).
As for the RTX 4060, I am not surprised it did so well. I never had one, but I always thought it was a good card even though the cool thing is to blast it. I guess I was never cool.
how did you make FC3 work on 14900K? i have 13900k and it doesnt launch
4K native and just use below 3Gb vram ❤ We need this kind of Ubisoft come back 🎉😢
One of my favorite games, plaid hell out of it. Paper Planes
I have the original, two, three and Blood Dragon. Only ones I've finished are the original and Dragon...
The title should have been "4K doesn't make you a better Driver!".
This game is the Van Halen II of gaming - the entire industry spent the next decade trying AND FAILING to copy it.
But... Can it run Crysis 2007???
Crysis Remastered with ever so slightly lower settings and RT off would also be interesting to see at 4K as it's visuals are pretty much identical (on the condition that one uses optimized graphical settings)
Back when Ubisoft was making great games
Far Cry 1, 3, 5 - best far crys by far. Didn't even finish the rest.
2, 4 and Primal are also pretty good in my opinion.
5 is not as good as the others! honestly Far Cry 1 and 3 are propably still the best.
G'day Random,
"But can it run FarCrysis ???" 😉
Hey I recently build a budget gaming pc and I chose AMD Radeon RX 7600 over RTX 4060..I made correct decision right?😊
Both are decent. Very similar performance depending on the game
DLSS is what is powering the modern gaming world, you've missed out on it.
@@kupokinzyt well yeah but fsr is doing very good, the fsr frame gen is on par if not even better than dlss frame generation, but intel XESS is the closest to dlss right now
It's a bit cheaper and very slightly more powerful on average, and FSR isn't that much behind DLSS nowadays. Honestly, not much of a difference, unless you were playing to run AI on it or something.
What did you pay?
How to get this game to not microstutter to death and run well? I struggle to get this to run maxed out at 1440p with a 3600x and 6600/1660
i want to know how good RTX 3050 6GB, the cheapest RTX card today, run Far Cry 4.
depends on your cpu, if you have i9-14900k and play it on 760 you will have better framerate than i3-10300f with 4090, the game is really CPU bottlenecked, they should update both fc3 and fc4 to utilize more than 2 cores.... to get best fps you better use only the best 2-4 cpu cores with process lasso for that game
@@krowan477 i never recalled something like i3 10300f lol, they don't have f series in those cpu 😅
I think you don't need i9 to play old games, even my i3 11th gen laptop with IGPU can run this game at medium-high in 768p.
So i expect this game runs great even at i3 12100f + RTX 3050 6GB.
That was Pirate Cove, not outpost. Far Cry 3 was the best, Far Cry 4 is like DLC for Far Cry 3. I remember waiting till midnight at Game to get shiny, new copy of Far Cry 3.
Actually, game looks great even today.
I see the CPU hitting 115W and can't help but feel a 5600G would do the same framerate at 15W in this scenario
Not at 4k lol
when I was played it decade ago, it was good looking game, with realistic-ish design , but poor physics and low destruction. now it still looks good, but I'd rather tell the design is more cartoon than realistic, almost look like borderlands
Looks at the deadliest bird on the planet - yeah, it’s definitely friendly!
I built fx6300 and R9 380 rig for this game
yeahj far cry 3 .... i remember playing it on my old athlon64x2 3800+ 9400gt and 2gb ram(than i upgraded to 3gb ) it ran at likle 30someting fps low settings probably 800x600
but here i am in 2024 i play it on winxp pc i7 3770 4gb ram 650ti 1g-this is my windows retro pc xp windows /10dualboot 480gb ssd
I played it in 2014 with radeon r7 250x
duude this blows the PS 3 farcry 3 out of the water, and back in to the water.
What FOV are you running on this lol
FAR CRY 1 WAS MASTERPIECE WHO AGREES LOT OF MEMORIES 😍
4:48 got me dead 😂💀