Southwest Boeing 737 BOTH ENGINES OVERHEAT. REAL ATC
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 23 май 2022
- 10 MAR 2022
A Southwest Airlines Boeing 737-700 registration N427WN performing flight SWA1697 from San Diego International Airport, to Metro Oakland International Airport. After departure requested return back to San Diego,
declared an emergency and reported both engines overheat.
If you enjoyed please support channel by subscribing and hitting the notification bell to get notified on new uploads.
Source of communications: www.liveatc.net (usage permission)
#REALATC #ATC #ATCCOMUNICATIONS 
Авто/Мото
![DRAGON BALL: Sparking! ZERO - Master and Apprentice Trailer [BUDOKAI TENKAICHI Series]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wNf7A4rHczc/mqdefault.jpg)
![[REAL ATC] American A333 | ALL FLIGHT ATTENDANTS SICK in flight!](/img/1.gif)
Just an insignificant point: The ATC asked for "personnel" on board. On another video the ATC asked for "passengers" on board. In both cases the pilots properly reported "souls on board". I presume the term "souls" is used so as to include every living person on the plane, whether passenger, employee, freebee, or whatever.
Nit Picky Nit Nit Pick Pick Nitty Picky Nit Nit.
Actually, souls is no longer standard. Persons is.
@@N1120A Source of your declarative assertion?
@@RLTtizME God ?
@@buckfaststradler4629 God called and said Roy Rogers was just making stuff up. We suspected that.
Kudos to all for getting this aircraft safely on the ground. . 👍✈✈👍
I don't exactly know how you produce the video and whether it is visually accurate, but I appreciate the effort you put to visualizing the events and the conversation, it gives a lot of good perspective e on what is going on at what time.
ffs add at least in the description the conclusion, have to google what happened every time, getting annoying
Nice video and good graphics.
Thank you! Don’t forget to subscribe😉
@@REALATCchannel I have. Keep up the good work.
That's it? How did it turn out?
i have been on that flight many times. i wonder if that was a jet i have flown on.
How do jet engines overheat? Was this an oil temperature or EGT problem? Anyone know?
Lesson learned. Don’t reach v1 speeds when taxiing and engines won’t overheat.
Ha ha. That one made me laugh. Classic Southwest
Hey..that's why we love Southwest. You just don't get it.
great channel
BOTH ENGINES? This is a serious incient that could potentially lead to a major catastrophic event. And notice how this never made the news? Interesting
You never hear about bad news at Swa.. Wonder how that works and why?
Probably because it was an indication error and the engines were acutally fine.
@@cjmillsnun that's a big indication error, both engines? You don't wanna take a chance.
its about 400nm from san diego to oakland... and he only has 2 hours of fuel....
Remember there are different phases of flight with different fuel burn rates for each phase. TO/climb burn a ton, but the payoff is a (more) efficient cruise and descent. Maneuvering around at less than 10k feet, you're gonna burn it a lot faster than you would under normal circumstances. Hence, 2 hours of fuel if they were to continue puttering around at lower altitudes where air is more dense creating more drag, and turbine efficiency is also degraded.
Less than an hour flight, two hours of fuel is about right
isnt this cutting it close in case of atc delays? weather delays?
@@cellis5111 what’s the weather like?
No@@cellis5111
so was it indication or real ?
Yes
Great answer@@RLTtizME
Interesting.. Both engine overheats.. All other indications normal? Tells me the panel has a shorted cannon plug.. Most likely.. Oil Temps are critical in this case. Also have the flight attendants check for anything unusual. Also perform a fire test to see if everything normal. However, could be some bleed air leak affecting both Walter kidde loops. Not likely but start the apu and pressurize the cabin with it alone.. Shut off both engine bleeds to engines. Damn,, I'm good. I could write the book on a 737. Basically an old design,, should have been retired 30 years ago
It’s the engine not the airframe
They’re off on a 1:33 flight with only 2 hours fuel?
Depends how far away their alternate is.
That is an old plane.
2:37, never good to hear alarms
That’s the autopilot disconnect “moo”. Cap prob decided to handfly the approach. Sometimes it’s just easier to put there jet where you want it manually
Autopilot disconnect reminder alarm
@@stevel8743 yes it is. And also, I'm sure he anticipated the possibility of losing both engines in which case you LOSE EVERYTHING, so your hands and feet better be on that SOB and it's back to basic stick and rudder.
Interesting! I never heard of an abort for engine overheat when there is no fire? What people do not know or understand is that Boeing builds airplanes and the engines come from either GE or Rolls Royce etc and are purchased by the airline. The Boeing Company name is used obviously even though they are blameless and Boeing’s name gets the bad press rather than the engine manufacturer. Boeing is responsible for installing the engines only. Any blame here belongs to the operator and engine manufacturer.
Almost correct. While the engine manufacturer is responsible for engine sensors on the engine, the airplane manufacturer is responsible for the cowlings, instrumentation, fuel tanks and hardware. Example is when a fan blade broke destroying the cowling and breaking a windows on a Southwest 737 killing a passenger NTSB has recommended Boeing make structural changes in cowling as this is designed for the type of failures that occurred. Airbus had a few cowling fly off in flight from issues with securing them. Boeing is getting bad press because almost every program they've been a part of in Commercial/Military/ Space has been late with various failures to meet contract specifications.
OK Dan we get it you work for Boeing
CFM > LEAP
SCHLEP > Elijah
ELIJAH: TALKING SPHINCTER
@@joelt4416 He has really bad breath.
@@RLTtizME Extra garlic as I breathe in your general direction
@@joelt4416 JOEL: underpaid agricultural pilot
The pilots seemed very overwhelmed for an issue with no flight control issues. Very flustered and disorganized vibes.
Not sure I could disagree more with your assessment. I thought the pilots handed that extremely well.
Ken I agree with you@@kennystar9075
god forbid that they should ever declare a pan=pan.
Maybe one engine would be pan pan pan pan pan pan pan pan
The FAA really needs to go down the ICAO route. "Declaring an emergency" is vague. Is it immediately life threatening, or a situation that could develop? The ICAO "MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY" or "PAN-PAN PAN-PAN PAN-PAN" removes that ambiguity.