I bought one of these at Sweetwater a while back and have it sitting above my Kronos X88 to this day. This keyboard is capable of fantastic synth sounds and the keybed action is excellent. There are sounds in this thing that haven't even been implemented into a patch yet. Don't judge the sound or capability of this synth by this demo or listening to your 1 inch iMac speakers. LOL All the complainers about the name don't have a clue what they're doing with a synth anyway. Negative commenters are the tinkerers who use 2 fingers to upload how to make a beat videos. From what I've learned of this synth I'm looking to buy the 80 too. These are quality keyboards unlike the new JD X toys R US plastic series.
I bought this keyboard recently, old stock, reduced price, to replace my D70. No complaints. Easy to programme. String and orchestral sounds are awesome, as are the acoustic sounds, accordion, trumpet, even pedal steel guitar. The Uileann Pipes are jaw dropping and I use them as bagpipes for Mull of Kintyre. A show stopper! Great Procul Harum Hammond sound as well with Leslie' effect. I frequently split and play bass with left hand, say for Jazz gigs, and the J50 is awesome, basses, piano and strings. Electric Pianos are wonderful. I don't do synthy sounds, so real synth players might be looking for something else with more nobs to twiddle? The J50 doesn't have after touch, but that's not too critical. There are 4 separate outputs, which for me is really useful, e.g. split bass to a bass amp. Split right hand to amp and PA. It's light too.
I love Sweetwater Sound. I recently purchased online from them, (First time buyer), a product, and got a call instantly after submitting my payment, from a personal specialist, thanking me for buying from them. He then let me know if I would need any help when receiving the product to give him a call. He gave me his personal number. I received my product 2 days later, and I live several states away. I got my product along with an awesomely huge product catalog. Best online experience ever!
I just bought one (Feb 2018) new at a bargain price because it was old stock from 2012. It is not a synth, and it is not a workstation, but it suits me well as I can get beautiful bass split, and really nice sounds on the right hand like layered piano and strings. The choirs, brass and woodwinds are awesome, as are the Uileann Pipes, accordions and harmonicas. Knockout! I considered a Nord (5 times dearer), but actually Roland were doing 30 years ago, what Nord is charging the earth for now, splits and layers and joysticks. The sounds are really nice and 'fat' great quality. It is only 11Kgs, so real easy on the ol' geezer! I don't use synth sounds myself, so couldn't care less about tweeking and building 'false' farting synth sounds from the 70s. I love the Pianos, Organs, Choirs, Strings, Brass and Guitar sounds. After all that, it's how you play that counts, the sounds are just the icing!
Its a complete synthesizer with editing and saving with parameters for oscillators, lfo, filter and amp envelopes, unison, portamento etc etc. Its just in the menu.
This is a pipe Dream of mine: If I had the money. I would buy these Roland Synthesisers and Keyboards. Starting with the Juno Gi, Di, I want them Jupiter 50 and the 80 I would like to own them all the Fantoms - X and G series...
+Demo My Song Yep. Absolutely agree. I miss my old J4… would LOVE to see Roland bring that back, alongside Korg/ARP and DSI bringin back other analogue greats. Roland never really emerged from preset-culture. Or haven't yet!
I've owned quite a few rolands..still do. I have to say that I love the ergonomic way they set their instruments up. Makes for an easy work flow. However, even the supernatural modeling engine still doesnt sound as lush as the VAST engine in my Kurzweil. i think for this price point you can purchase a PC3 and give yourself the option to have all of that programming/ samplie power. The Kurzweils have a much larger learning curve.
Roland keybords have their own 'character' sounds which are really great that stands them apart from other manufacturers. But, having to accept third party samples would have made them just awesome. This is the major limitation for Roland. They always cut some major features in each series of keyboards/synths which limits the potential of these wonderful instruments.
Ed Diaz please help me. I need the Synth Editor APP or be able to download it and the Jupiter 80 sound patches. What attracted me to the Jupiter 50 was the fact that I would have IPad color screen and access to the Jupiter 80 sounds from what i remember reading in the manual as well as the other video promotion material. I’m now being placed between a rock and a hard place. I now feel like one that is being scammed by Roland and Apple. I bought my brand new Jupiter 50 cash here in Shanghai China, where I stay, over a year ago and had to save up to buy an IPad3 (ios 5 to 10) as the Synth Pad requires Ios 5 to Ios10 after incorrectly buying an Ipad5 (ios12) December 2018. I’m told that apple removed the Synth editor. Please help me retain my trust in the Roland Brand. Hoping to hear from you soon. THANK YOU
I agree, the 80 sounds great. My only complaint about the 50 is the lack of aftertouch. Roland definitely made a poor decision to leave it out. For someone who gigs, the 80 look like a great choice though.
@adawson2410g : Piano sounds far better than the Fantom G ones. You can't really appreciate them due sound quality loss in youtube. I own the Jupiter-80 and I can say that both piano sound and dynamic behaviour are excelent.
it should be first a recreation of the Jupiter 8 and then a flamenco performance synth. People are looking for synthesizers not gig samples....I bought the Integra 7 and am not happy with the 80's recreation sounds of that 8 model.
Lexcoaster I kind of agree with that. On the other hand, the keyboard players using those sounds have to really understand how those instrument work to make something that will be playable naturally by double bass players, guitarists etc.
a lot of mainstream pop and R&B tracks have this kind of synthetic emulations of acoustic instruments. Personally I love "fake" guitars or strings, they're sometimes more exciting than real instruments.
I play double bass on keyboard a few times a month, at jazz gigs where your trio consists of drums, guitar, and keys (where the keys player is both piano and bass).
Bought one few years ago. The biggest waste of money in my life ($1,400). I decided to buy Roland because they replaced the LCD display of my old Juno-G for free and this Jupiter-50 is Made in Japan. Very disappointed. Supports sucks. Yes, there are sounds and lots of layering of supposedly Natural sounds but that's it. To try to use sound or manage the whole keyboard is impossible dued to dumbest logics and shortage of numeric keypad and missing shortcut. Let me give you some examples: 1- There is no Rythm, No Drum or Metronome. The Tempo can be used only for Arpegio. Beat will not start when pressing Tempo because it is controlled by residing Arpegio clock. Therefore, 1st beat always delays. No way to synch with outside audio. 2- Group of instruments are so poorly put together. Start with MANUAL to the Left then press a colorful group. Looking for subgroups have to press 2-3 different kinds of buttons or dials to the Mid-Right. Many times have to ENTER first. Then Right or Left Arrows (without labels). Same Arrows may be Sub-sub elements or may be Main groups. DECrease or INCrease sometimes same as Up & Down Arrows, sometimes NOT. 3- Under the tomb of Main group of patches (Roland calls sounds and few more different terms), I discovered hidden chambers of many more patches of UNRELATED to Main but link to other group . And it is hard to go back and dig it because there is no consistent steps to follow. 4- Some of the control buttons are to the left and I have to press some to the right. And this has to do with the biggest and dumbest in Design and Production: The BANK. There are 8 BANKS with 4 subgroup and with 4 patches under each subgroup (like [Set01] 1-4 to [Set01] 4-4, but this stupid keyboard has only 4 white lighted buttons that can choose only 1 to 4 of the sub-sub set. It will NOT activate [Set02], NOT [Set03] NOT all the way to [Set08] because if I press 3 then 2 it will do only [Set01] 3-2 and that's it! Out of 8x16=128 selections, I can directly do 4. Well, may be 16 but I have to go back and hit BANK first! There is No direct way to get to [Set02] 1-1 to [Set08] 4-4. Have to begin with BANK hit ENTER then Right or Left Arrow then Up or Down or DEC or INC or Dial. By the time I reach the perset I want, the time is GONE! 5- All preset sounds that are supposed to be showcase sound so terrible (lowest taste in music). Output levels are not uniform, mostly too low. Took me a year (on/off) to try to standardize before gave up. I wanted to use for simple Arrangement but soon told myself "Forget about it". I put a blanket over it and went back to JUNO-G.
I use it, but mostly cause I paid so much for it that I can't bear not struggling with its poor interface to get some sort of value from it. And thanks for the middle finger to Samsung owners with the Apple app. If you think I'm gonna buy an Apple so I can work through the retarded menus then you're off your rocker.
Paid only €900 (second hand) for mine. Granted, rather cumbersome to adjust the sounds etc., but what I love about it: keys, e.piano sounds, some of the string and horn sounds, sound behaviour in general. There's metronome in REC mode, kinda goofy it can't be used outside of it (of that I know).
What is sad is that it is called a synth, but honestly it is a music workstation. You can't create your own synth patches from raw waveforms no deep control over the envelopes. If only Roland make real synthesizers again not music workstations.
@ Europa's Ocean1 The definition of a workstation is the ability to built your own trax with 1 device, without a sequencer its just another synth/keyboard
It's designed for performance and doesn't have a knob for each parameter like the system 8 or gaia sh-01. You create and save new synth sounds on the synth edit screen. You have complete control over selection of oscillators, Lfo, filter and amp envelopes, pitch, unison, portamento etc,etc. Ed was just explaining the performance parameters. Same on the Juno ds synthesizers you also have full editing and saving of synthesizer parameters in the patch edit screen.
its amazing and i love the sounds but the fat on this synth is 0 this synth doesn't have warm and low end, even the Yamaha CS Reface has more warm and i love Roland :(
Ok, once again for you: I'm not complaining about the fact that it is a scaled down version but about the fact that you get a half backed editor which is iOS only. Do you get it? It has nothing to do with being a scaled down version. Everybody has a computer but not an iPad and especially not a few interfaces laying around. BTW, I don't own the jp50 but the jp80. I wouldn't touch that piece of crap even with a stick for that money. Just take a look at the ridiculous patch selection. What a fail.
Ffs the jupiter was a synthesizer not an organ piano or bloody rhodes. I am so sick of these doosh bags demonstratating bloody pianos bloody organs rhodes and bloody flamingo guitars. I want to see the potential for new sound creation on a synthesis basis not crap you can hear on a psr or casio. I have many keyboards and have plenty of pianos. Anyways. Next time demonstrate more of the synth end please...
A very poor choice of names for a synth that has nothing in common with the Jupiter legacy. Roland should have named this fake Jupiter the "Juno-Xi" or "Juno-Zi", which would have been more appropriate.
Before 1987 the Junos had dco oscillators and the Jupiter synthesizers had vco oscillators. Since the d50 in 1987 it's basically been pcm sounds with a confusing naming system. The only bad thing is dco and vco oscillators die.
"You've been listening to Roland Jupiter 50..." Is a lie. I've been listening to you talking most of time. Still don't know what the instrument sounds like. Moving on...
good tip..stop trying toi sell them goddam awful guitar sounds like the flamenco....personally I m happy for a keyboard to be keyboardy..when I need guitar I ll pick one up and play it..always always sounds better..even if it s a cheap shit axe!
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
This is sick! And it's video from 11 years ago! Now I need one 😁
Ed Diaz, the guy that can demo gear as no other. Always a joy to see Ed play.
I bought one of these at Sweetwater a while back and have it sitting above my Kronos X88 to this day. This keyboard is capable of fantastic synth sounds and the keybed action is excellent.
There are sounds in this thing that haven't even been implemented into a patch yet. Don't judge the sound or capability of this synth by this demo or listening to your 1 inch iMac speakers. LOL
All the complainers about the name don't have a clue what they're doing with a synth anyway. Negative commenters are the tinkerers who use 2 fingers to upload how to make a beat videos.
From what I've learned of this synth I'm looking to buy the 80 too. These are quality keyboards unlike the new JD X toys R US plastic series.
I bought this keyboard recently, old stock, reduced price, to replace my D70. No complaints. Easy to programme. String and orchestral sounds are awesome, as are the acoustic sounds, accordion, trumpet, even pedal steel guitar. The Uileann Pipes are jaw dropping and I use them as bagpipes for Mull of Kintyre. A show stopper! Great Procul Harum Hammond sound as well with Leslie' effect. I frequently split and play bass with left hand, say for Jazz gigs, and the J50 is awesome, basses, piano and strings. Electric Pianos are wonderful. I don't do synthy sounds, so real synth players might be looking for something else with more nobs to twiddle? The J50 doesn't have after touch, but that's not too critical. There are 4 separate outputs, which for me is really useful, e.g. split bass to a bass amp. Split right hand to amp and PA. It's light too.
This guy can play
great presentation adn great guy. Still I don't understand why Roland does not create an APP also for Android of Win 8 users????
Huge and impressive! And I'm not just talking about Ed!
I've never really got into the Jupiter series but since the X and Xm have been announced I've been checking them out and they are pretty impressive!
Price difference: Jupiter-8 $8K, Jupiter-80 $3.5K, Jupiter-50 $2K. Market is lovely. You always get what you pay for.
I love Sweetwater Sound. I recently purchased online from them, (First time buyer), a product, and got a call instantly after submitting my payment, from a personal specialist, thanking me for buying from them. He then let me know if I would need any help when receiving the product to give him a call. He gave me his personal number. I received my product 2 days later, and I live several states away. I got my product along with an awesomely huge product catalog. Best online experience ever!
BRILLIANT demonstration. Totally professional !!
I just bought one (Feb 2018) new at a bargain price because it was old stock from 2012. It is not a synth, and it is not a workstation, but it suits me well as I can get beautiful bass split, and really nice sounds on the right hand like layered piano and strings. The choirs, brass and woodwinds are awesome, as are the Uileann Pipes, accordions and harmonicas. Knockout! I considered a Nord (5 times dearer), but actually Roland were doing 30 years ago, what Nord is charging the earth for now, splits and layers and joysticks. The sounds are really nice and 'fat' great quality. It is only 11Kgs, so real easy on the ol' geezer! I don't use synth sounds myself, so couldn't care less about tweeking and building 'false' farting synth sounds from the 70s. I love the Pianos, Organs, Choirs, Strings, Brass and Guitar sounds. After all that, it's how you play that counts, the sounds are just the icing!
Its a complete synthesizer with editing and saving with parameters for oscillators, lfo, filter and amp envelopes, unison, portamento etc etc. Its just in the menu.
This is a pipe Dream of mine: If I had the money. I would buy these Roland Synthesisers and Keyboards. Starting with the Juno Gi, Di, I want them
Jupiter 50 and the 80 I would like to own them all the Fantoms - X and G series...
To my ears the Jupiter-50 sounds exactly like what it is... an emulation.
+Demo My Song
Emulation of what?
The Jupiter and Juno series sounds that the J-50 produces are digital re-creations of the original analog synths.
+Demo My Song Yep. Absolutely agree. I miss my old J4… would LOVE to see Roland bring that back, alongside Korg/ARP and DSI bringin back other analogue greats. Roland never really emerged from preset-culture. Or haven't yet!
+Demo My Song guess VSti's have a heads up compared to this
I've owned quite a few rolands..still do. I have to say that I love the ergonomic way they set their instruments up. Makes for an easy work flow. However, even the supernatural modeling engine still doesnt sound as lush as the VAST engine in my Kurzweil. i think for this price point you can purchase a PC3 and give yourself the option to have all of that programming/ samplie power. The Kurzweils have a much larger learning curve.
Great Synth... Love the Jupiters...
Beautiful sounds
Track name for the Club Stack part? 2:09?
Dude that 106 bass riff ha dope!
Gostei muito do Jupiter 50. Tenho um Juno Stage .... ele seria o substituto? tem tambem slots para placa de expansao? Grato
Cool j aime bien le jupiter 50; 80 and 8 of course
Can you control the drawbars of the J-50's organs with the editor on the iPad? The Jupiter 50 lacks the touchscreen.
Roland keybords have their own 'character' sounds which are really great that stands them apart from other manufacturers. But, having to accept third party samples would have made them just awesome. This is the major limitation for Roland. They always cut some major features in each series of keyboards/synths which limits the potential of these wonderful instruments.
Can you create a tutorial boss fs6 with the jupiter 50. How to setup and assign to control 1 or control 2. Thankyou...
Ed Diaz please help me. I need the Synth Editor APP or be able to download it and the Jupiter 80 sound patches. What attracted me to the Jupiter 50 was the fact that I would have IPad color screen and access to the Jupiter 80 sounds from what i remember reading in the manual as well as the other video promotion material. I’m now being placed between a rock and a hard place. I now feel like one that is being scammed by Roland and Apple. I bought my brand new Jupiter 50 cash here in Shanghai China, where I stay, over a year ago and had to save up to buy an IPad3 (ios 5 to 10) as the Synth Pad requires Ios 5 to Ios10 after incorrectly buying an Ipad5 (ios12) December 2018. I’m told that apple removed the Synth editor. Please help me retain my trust in the Roland Brand. Hoping to hear from you soon. THANK YOU
I agree, the 80 sounds great. My only complaint about the 50 is the lack of aftertouch. Roland definitely made a poor decision to leave it out. For someone who gigs, the 80 look like a great choice though.
@adawson2410g : Piano sounds far better than the Fantom G ones. You can't really appreciate them due sound quality loss in youtube. I own the Jupiter-80 and I can say that both piano sound and dynamic behaviour are excelent.
can anyone list all of the acoustic instruments the Jupiter-50 can mimic?
A gigging one actually!Keyboardists that gig and have to deal with dwindling budgets at venues have to do a lot of things musically.
it should be first a recreation of the Jupiter 8 and then a flamenco performance synth. People are looking for synthesizers not gig samples....I bought the Integra 7 and am not happy with the 80's recreation sounds of that 8 model.
Does anyone know what the app is called?
wow incredible
this is impressive
nice bass at 1:31
It is so sad that it does not include a sequencer, it would be the best workstation with the sound quality it has :(
Where is 2:09 from? Track name?
What serious musician plays double bass or flamenco guitar on a keyboard?
It might make it easier for a musician who doesn't play double bass or guitar to share musical ideas with musicians who do.
Lexcoaster
I kind of agree with that. On the other hand, the keyboard players using those sounds have to really understand how those instrument work to make something that will be playable naturally by double bass players, guitarists etc.
Well, that's where that strange thing called 'musicianship' comes into play, I guess. :)
a lot of mainstream pop and R&B tracks have this kind of synthetic emulations of acoustic instruments. Personally I love "fake" guitars or strings, they're sometimes more exciting than real instruments.
I play double bass on keyboard a few times a month, at jazz gigs where your trio consists of drums, guitar, and keys (where the keys player is both piano and bass).
does the jp 50 have the same sounds as the jp 80
Jeffrey Yocum YEA it does have the same sound
How much is this?
Trevor Regnier 1,100,000 pesos. i think its 30000 dolllar
Dup Gapud not even its like $1,200.00 used maybe because brand new...I don’t know where you going to find one
You will need a very strong keyboard stand to hold all those synths my dear !!
If I ever need to do a Stevie Wonder flavored porn soundtrack, I have the perfect keyboard. Thanks.
Watch for my upcoming youtube video. I will be tossing Roland's Jupiter 80 & 50 out of my car at 85 MPH on the expressway.
Hello,
How do I save my favorite sound into the bank?
Bought one few years ago. The biggest waste of money in my life ($1,400).
I decided to buy Roland because they replaced the LCD display of my old Juno-G for free and this Jupiter-50 is Made in Japan. Very disappointed. Supports sucks. Yes, there are sounds and lots of layering of supposedly Natural sounds but that's it. To try to use sound or manage the whole keyboard is impossible dued to dumbest logics and shortage of numeric keypad and missing shortcut. Let me give you some examples:
1- There is no Rythm, No Drum or Metronome. The Tempo can be used only for Arpegio. Beat will not start when pressing Tempo because it is controlled by residing Arpegio clock. Therefore, 1st beat always delays. No way to synch with outside audio.
2- Group of instruments are so poorly put together. Start with MANUAL to the Left then press a colorful group. Looking for subgroups have to press 2-3 different kinds of buttons or dials to the Mid-Right. Many times have to ENTER first. Then Right or Left Arrows (without labels). Same Arrows may be Sub-sub elements or may be Main groups. DECrease or INCrease sometimes same as Up & Down Arrows, sometimes NOT.
3- Under the tomb of Main group of patches (Roland calls sounds and few more different terms), I discovered hidden chambers of many more patches of UNRELATED to Main but link to other group . And it is hard to go back and dig it because there is no consistent steps to follow.
4- Some of the control buttons are to the left and I have to press some to the right. And this has to do with the biggest and dumbest in Design and Production: The BANK. There are 8 BANKS with 4 subgroup and with 4 patches under each subgroup (like [Set01] 1-4 to [Set01] 4-4, but this stupid keyboard has only 4 white lighted buttons that can choose only 1 to 4 of the sub-sub set. It will NOT activate [Set02], NOT [Set03] NOT all the way to [Set08] because if I press 3 then 2 it will do only [Set01] 3-2 and that's it! Out of 8x16=128 selections, I can directly do 4. Well, may be 16 but I have to go back and hit BANK first! There is No direct way to get to [Set02] 1-1 to [Set08] 4-4. Have to begin with BANK hit ENTER then Right or Left Arrow then Up or Down or DEC or INC or Dial. By the time I reach the perset I want, the time is GONE!
5- All preset sounds that are supposed to be showcase sound so terrible (lowest taste in music). Output levels are not uniform, mostly too low. Took me a year (on/off) to try to standardize before gave up. I wanted to use for simple Arrangement but soon told myself "Forget about it". I put a blanket over it and went back to JUNO-G.
Very well grounded criticism [+1]. Let me ask you: can you tell if the Jupiter 80 has the same "cons"?
I use it, but mostly cause I paid so much for it that I can't bear not struggling with its poor interface to get some sort of value from it. And thanks for the middle finger to Samsung owners with the Apple app. If you think I'm gonna buy an Apple so I can work through the retarded menus then you're off your rocker.
Paid only €900 (second hand) for mine. Granted, rather cumbersome to adjust the sounds etc., but what I love about it: keys, e.piano sounds, some of the string and horn sounds, sound behaviour in general. There's metronome in REC mode, kinda goofy it can't be used outside of it (of that I know).
S. Rock that middle finger is from Samsung though. They have to make their os more conducive to music production and performance apps
cool
RIP ears and laptop speakers
What is sad is that it is called a synth, but honestly it is a music workstation. You can't create your own synth patches from raw waveforms no deep control over the envelopes. If only Roland make real synthesizers again not music workstations.
@ Europa's Ocean1 The definition of a workstation is the ability to built your own trax with 1 device,
without a sequencer its just another synth/keyboard
You’re dumb it is clearly a performance synth
It's designed for performance and doesn't have a knob for each parameter like the system 8 or gaia sh-01. You create and save new synth sounds on the synth edit screen. You have complete control over selection of oscillators, Lfo, filter and amp envelopes, pitch, unison, portamento etc,etc. Ed was just explaining the performance parameters. Same on the Juno ds synthesizers you also have full editing and saving of synthesizer parameters in the patch edit screen.
Piano roland super
its amazing and i love the sounds but the fat on this synth is 0 this synth doesn't have warm and low end, even the Yamaha CS Reface has more warm and i love Roland :(
Ok, once again for you:
I'm not complaining about the fact that it is a scaled down version but about the fact that you get a half backed editor which is iOS only. Do you get it? It has nothing to do with being a scaled down version. Everybody has a computer but not an iPad and especially not a few interfaces laying around.
BTW, I don't own the jp50 but the jp80. I wouldn't touch that piece of crap even with a stick for that money. Just take a look at the ridiculous patch selection. What a fail.
Piano sounds the same as the Fantom G.
The orange, green, yellow colors are a bit toyish. Still nice features.
That's how the original one look back in the 80s
Toes for fingers
Still better than you!
And you have crap for brains for making such a comment.
Don't like the piano sounds but synth reminds me of my old Juno 60 many moons ago.
Fran Curry How can you not love the piano sounds? What's missing?
Yeah I know Ha ha ha ha ha
Ffs the jupiter was a synthesizer not an organ piano or bloody rhodes. I am so sick of these doosh bags demonstratating bloody pianos bloody organs rhodes and bloody flamingo guitars. I want to see the potential for new sound creation on a synthesis basis not crap you can hear on a psr or casio. I have many keyboards and have plenty of pianos. Anyways. Next time demonstrate more of the synth end please...
I can created those sounds
+Samuel Hall IV what are you talking about
Много разговора стиля нет
A very poor choice of names for a synth that has nothing in common with the Jupiter legacy. Roland should have named this fake Jupiter the "Juno-Xi" or "Juno-Zi", which would have been more appropriate.
Before 1987 the Junos had dco oscillators and the Jupiter synthesizers had vco oscillators. Since the d50 in 1987 it's basically been pcm sounds with a confusing naming system. The only bad thing is dco and vco oscillators die.
やっぱり日本語でないとわからないや 雰囲気で観ないと
Nothing new.....under the sun.....
Wha wha clavinet is AWFUL!!!! 4 the rest, good synth.
Korg Krome is better and the sounds more realistics!
Not to me the Korg Krome sounds, sound like utter crap, tried sooo hard to like them. + these tones are adjustable also.
Korg Krome and Korg Oasys are the best.
"You've been listening to Roland Jupiter 50..." Is a lie. I've been listening to you talking most of time. Still don't know what the instrument sounds like. Moving on...
no... just no.
good tip..stop trying toi sell them goddam awful guitar sounds like the flamenco....personally I m happy for a keyboard to be keyboardy..when I need guitar I ll pick one up and play it..always always sounds better..even if it s a cheap shit axe!
yes - but what about all of us who can't play guitar?? We'd like even an awful guitar emulation than no guitar at all on our tracks.
Korg Krome is better and the sounds more realistics!