Tough Choice: Tudor Black Bay 58 vs Tudor Black Bay Pro
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 мар 2024
- In this video, I will compare two of the most popular models from Tudor: Tudor Black Bay Pro and Tudor Black Bay 58. If you are choosing between these two Tudor models, I hope this video will be helpful.
Other watch reviews you might like:
Why I changed my mind about the Tudor Black Bay Pro GMT • Why I changed my mind ...
10 Great watches you won't regret buying • 10 Great watches you w...
Seiko SPB143 vs Tudor Black Bay 58 | | 2 Years of Ownership Honest Review • Seiko SPB143 vs Tudor ... 
Хобби
I own and love them both. They fit my 6.75 in wrist just perfectly and both are just a joy to wear 👍
Cool! I would have hard time choosing which Tudor to wear :)
@@OneManReviews fully agree. It always depends on the type of appointments and meetings at work but also on the weekdays. Especially in weekends, the BB 58 is my 1st choice. BTW, I love the thickness of the BB Pro 👍
Great vid and just subscribed! I’m a BB58 blue owner. I had trouble getting a good fit with the bracelet until I got an uncle seiko half link. I do miss it not having a date function so Pro or the GMT are in my radar. A Pro with the Opaline dial would be cool!
Thanks Andy for your support! I was lucky to get a good fit of my BB58. The opaline dial BB Pro would be awesome! Can't wait to see what Tudor introduce in 2024.
I own both watches as part of a wider collection. I think the Pro is the better watch without a doubt.
@Anonymouslyme1thanks for the comment. If I had both I would have a hard time choosing which Tudor to wear :)
BBPro is just great. Thickness aside, which is still acceptable at the end.
The watch is great indeed.
BB Pro with white dial with 1mm slimmer case profile would be perfect watch 👌 its worth to wait new releases at watch and wonders 24
Can't wait to see what Tudor will introduce.
58 for me. I already have the 58 but enjoy the simple 3 hander and have no need for the gmt function but can agree the pro gives you more features for the money
The 58 is nearly perfect for me too. But the Pro is tempting. Have you tried the BB54?
@@OneManReviews i haven't. I don't have a nearby a.d. available to try one on but without trying the 54 i feel like the 58 is perfectly sized for my 7 1/4 in wrist. I'd hate to find out that i like the 54 better and leave myself in a conundrum. 😄 i do like the larger crown on the 58 but enjoy the lollipop second hand and t-fit on the 54 bracelet
@@codys5727 I haven't tried it yet also and also afraid that I might like it better than the BB58. Although like you I think that the BB58 has a perfect fit for me 😊
Thank you for the comparison. I think aluminum bezel is outdated and ceramic should be the way to go with any BB. I own the BB pro and love it. I hope Tudor will upgrade the BB bezel and bracelet. Thanks for the review. Cheers neighbour
Thank you! I agree that technologically aluminium bezels are outdated but I personally like the vintage look of it. Ceramic bezels could be too shiny.
@@OneManReviews I own both Pelagos 42 and 39, The 42 ceramic bezel is mat finish and looks amazing. 39 bezel is a little bit more shiny than the 39 and you can see the difference in both the dial and the bezel. Tudor got the technology to produce a mat finish Ceramic bezels for sure. I was going to buy the BB GMT Pepsi with Opaline dial, but the aluminum bezel was a big NO for me given the retailer price. Thanks again for the review, looking forward your new video. Cheers!
I think the alum bezel gives a warmth and richness that the ceramic does not. The different tomes that Show through in different lighting is not as obvious on ceramic bezels.
If the BB line changes to ceramic bezels I will not buy one. The 54 with a ceramic bezel will be an anacronicm it itself.
@@WatchesnguitarsDK Good Point!
The BB Pro has many unique design elements exclusive to the Pro model: simple index markers (without metal surrounding) and a steel bezel. The fact that it comes in only a single color offering in black makes it more desirable, as the BB58 offers many different color options, which makes it less unique. The 39mm size also makes it more wearable for my 6.5-inch wrist compared to the Explorer II. I currently own a Rolex Explorer I, and I'm considering selling it since the Pro makes more sense as a tool watch.
The 58 is aesthetically and proportionately the most perfect watch i have ever owned. Its beauty in my eyes surpass many rolex models.
The pro is also beautiful, but does not outshine the explorer 2.
Both of these watches are beautiful, and are keepers in my collection.
Disagree, I've owned one, the hour hand is horrible and the rivet bracelet does not look good. It is also a very boring looking watch, just look at used prices, nobody wants Tudor anymore
@The_Igloo I agree with you on the BB58 it is nearly perfect watch and it gives me the 5 digit Rolex models vibe.
The pro all the way. The GMT function alone makes it worth it.
If that feature is important for you then definitely.
My personnal preference go for the tudor gmt,less simple,more personality,of course i dont have both watch for see in real who is the best
@micaljimenez7381 The GMT provides more watch for the money for sure.
Pro is so handsome watch
It is.
Longines Spirit Zulu Time Hodinkee in titanium ;)
That's a good one ;)
BB 54. You buy that one.
Maybe one day.
Neither. Save another $1,000-1,500 and buy an actual luxury watch. You know, the kind where the bezel is aligned and the date transitions when it's supposed to... 😂😂😂