You can watch katame-waza and sutemi-waza techniques only in seminars, special keiko. But you can't record any of these techniques, furthermore surround in class the curtains always are closed.
Katame-waza are grounding techniques and Sutemi-waza are sacrifice techniques, yes because you're sacrificing your own balance to proyect the Uke. The same thing happen in others traditional martial arts like Daito-Ryu for example. It's really dificult to get masters to learn those kind of techniques. Maybe that why there're too many of them with lack of knowlege like this.
I am an Aikido practitioner. I am not aware of ground fighting in Aikido until I saw this clip. Can you tell me what style of Aikido this is? In with belt ranking that these groundwork techniques introduced. Is this a hybrid of Jujitsu/Aikido or pure Aikido? Thx in advances.
This is an old comment so I'm not sure if you'll read this, but Aikido does have ground grapples and locks. Look up the book Aikido and the Dynamic Sphere. It's essentially an Aikido bible. not only does it go over every concept within Aikido, but it shows all the displays of both standing grapples, and ground grapples.
i'm an aikidoka myself, and i've learned some forms of finger lock. although i've only been learning aikido for a few years, i'm advising you to please stop imagining your techniques on others outside practice. visualizing can only go so far. even if you managed to somehow lock someone's finger in a "real-fight" situation, chances are they will still knock you down... with a broken finger
***** if you look very closely as uke ( attacker) comes into attack tori ( defender ) enters quickly to seize that attack then goes straight into a technique that's how it works ?
***** Hi Bakir, Not necessarily So; In Aikido the underlying understanding and/or application of "Omote" and "Ura" can vary from style to style. In "Omote" form you can actually initiate the attack - In fact when ever possible one should apply "Omote" rather than "Ura" if the conflict can not be avoided. The Ura is the last resort when you did not have the chance to react or initiate taking the control early on. Some styles practice far more "Ura" than "Omote" which may result in weaker overall posture, though the soft side will be trained more. (Said in another way; If you train more Omote you will utilize all your combined ""Strength/Power"" untill you are faced with the stronger opponent - Then you utilizes the "Ura"). Secondary the sensitivity and thereby the reaction speed when the opponent is attacking can be very quick for an experienced Aikido Practitioner - Like sensing the attack in a blitz (or essentially in the very same moment) and you will already be on to the "receiving/engaging" of the attack. In the perfect blending all the other factors of the situation (surroundings, Number of opponents etc.) will determine your Ura or Omote choice - So if one has not trained the Omote properly then it will be much more difficult to advance or take the initiative and with bad Ura Skills one is certainly subject to go down to a stronger opponent. One could say that the Ura form is obvious Expression of Aikido, but more even so the Omote Form should be trained to get the best of your physical and mental possibilities, before relying on the Ura. With good and steady training over a long time period still many people would think they have the upper hand over you in a dire situation - with Omote well trained, such situations will end before they even have begun. While one must never underestimate anybody it is for sure that opponents that in fact are weaker than you does not need to be given any chances at all for any openings. And for the stronger and much more dangerous opponents the teaching of Aikido is more or less obvious to practitioners of the Aikido. --- He might look a bit early on in this video, but as such it´s not way off.
I enjoy many of the videos I watch but even more entertaining are the comments. I read a lot of BJJ people on this one. I give great credit to the BJJ system and those who train it and yes, your ground will be (and should be) better than what you see from other arts. Why wouldn't it that is 100% of your skills as were other arts maybe 25% or even less is groundwork. I respect BJJ skills but I am aware that it is only a small slice of a larger pie. Discounting all other things, as many (if not most or all) Bjj people do could be placing too many eggs into one basket. Yes, as far as I know, BJJ is at the top of the ground game mountain but that is only the tip of the iceberg, literally. Focus on just a very small aspect you get really good at that aspect but you miss everything else. When you walk through life with blinders you only see a small part of everything around you. Most who do this feel that is all they need to see and that's ok, no skin off my nose. But why feel the need to always poke and jab at something you can't really see anyway. One day each person who does this will walk up to a piece of brown fur and poke it, only later will they realize it is a bear, and all you have is that very thin and small stick.
Not at all. The assumption in traditional Aikido - which this is not - is that the opponent is always armed.Most judo and jujitsu work on the assumption its all empty handed. This is both a plus and minus for Aikido. So Aikido's movements and responses are based on uke has an edged weapon which makes ground fighting a losing proposition.
+Ezi0AuditoreDiFirenz I believe the point of that armbar is to make it harder for the opponent to bite your leg while you do it, compared to a regular Judo/BJJ armbar.
They don't allow it because of the gloves. It's a difficult technique when you have gloves on. Also, you're not going to incpacitate my whole body just because you have my finger. There's more than one way to take someone down. One can take someone down even while their opponent is controlling their entire arm or hand, so a finger is not a big deal.
igiboy1989 Funny you should mention, I started BJJ about 3 months ago. It compliments Aikido well, but I think that the best possible combo for street readiness is Kickboxing and BJJ these days. They just seem to ready a person for real combat far more than any other combination of styles.
@@HorridFrothin my opinion the best way to get fight ready is wrestling, I can’t wait to blend my background in wrestling with aikido. Aikido is an amazing system I’ve been bouncing for years.
You're kidding, right? You can grap your opponents wrist for wrist locks. Why don't I see Anderson doing any Aikido wrist throws in his fights? When someone kicks Silva, why don't I see him defend like and Aikidoka? Why is it that there has not been 1 single Aikidoka to prove himself effective in
hang99 with mma you are watched by a referee to look for that submission tap that's why they only tap once, in this video as you can see attacker is doing it 3 times to show you that pressure is been applied there isn't anything wrong with this. on the street there's no tap just a snap have noticed that the man in his video sounds like bas rutten maybe it is him ?
Well if it is not selfdefence what is the point of learning this, then aikido becomes a sport and like master Ueshiba said Aikido is budo and not a sport. Sport or grappling has regulations and rules. I don't say that the performer isn't skilled, I only don't see the point in this.
So because you have one of my fingers locked, I an't strike you with my other hand, my legs, my head, etc? I think I can. Also, you pushing forward would give me the momentum to throw. Another thing, you think that you can armbar a BJJ/Judo practitioner? Aikidoka can't even do armbars correctly...
That link didn't work. Also, yes they are. If his Aikido techniques worked, he would use them. Most of the techniques I saw in this video are legal in MMA. Why doesn't Silva use them? The truth is, Segal has never proven himself as an effective fighter outside of movies. He's never actually been a fighter.
Hardly by 50%. If somehow you we able to lock my finger before I took you down (highly unlikely) I would just strike you with a free limb. I've seen people trying to strike while in Kimura locks before.
This is very skilful and practical but you realise that it cannot be called Aikido anymore. It is rather classical jiujitsu that includes newaza in its curriculum. Some styles of Aikido have some sutemi waza techniques but pure newaza has nothing to do with Aikido, whatsoever. I understand the necessity of attracting new students in this era of modern martial arts, MMA, combat arts like Systema becoming more and more popular but Aikido is very traditional and specific form of self-defence.
I totally dislike pre arranged shows even to demonstrate tecniques however Akido practicioners do know how to inflict damadging locks even on the ground or standup against wall etc .
+Chris Chiang it's Aiki-based movements utilizing the principles of Aikido. Forget about a specific syllabus. A: you may not be familiar with every Aikido form and school and hence their specific syllabus. B: a syllabus is not a style, it is simply a tool to teach the principles of a style.
I fail to see how your comment is relevant to mine, but alright, fair enough. It's ironic that i see you are content in "running around" here though. oh well, to each their own. have a good day then sir
i see what's the problem here.you are being too defensive. a true martial artist always keep an open mind and is humble, regardless of how far he has mastered his discipline or art. Each and every argument you made before just lost its credibility. i can't see you being other than an overly proud practitioner
thats right,it aint aikido and its isnt impressive when theres no resistance,it takes very little skill to do anything in that clip.Its also stupid to go to the ground with someone after you just thrown them cleanly.
There is plenty to complain about: First technique 0:43 why he is already surrendering the fight? 5:21 why again he is simply surrendering him self to this idiotic technique? Why the guy with hakama didn't ended on the floor after extremely easy/obvious punch with right hand/elbow that should land on the face of this wanna be Aikido master? The guy in hakama is breaking basic rules of Budo so it can't be called Aikido.
Nobody stops you from adding ground techniques to your Aikido curriculum, but frankly doing that in Hakama is stupid. Dump the Hakama if you want to play Gracy jujutsu.
You do understand that bjj was based on Japanese jujitsu right? And that aikido is older than bjj? These are classic techniques don’t know why that triggers you lol
I would love to see an aikido video in which their training dummy actually actively resists instead of just rag-dolling themselves. Aikido is dumb, aikido doesn't work
+Michael R. usually in aikido first you are learning techniques based on actual attack. When you are resisting you've just stopped or changed your attack - in most dojos they learn how to control resisting opponent and change technique(oyo henka) after few years of training. Sorry for my english, hope I had written clearly.
But the thing is most, if not all of these techniques will not work on an actively resisting opponent. Of all the aikido that i have seen both in person and through videos it consists of a partner who is either standing still letting the other person apply the technique or them running into the other letting the apply the technique. The best kind of techniques are the ones in which you can perform them on someone who does not want them to be performed on them. Aikido does not have that, let alone they do not even have sparring or rolling. Without that element you do not know if you will be able to perform them in any type of situation outside of the dojo Aikido does not work
ANY combat situation outside of movies? Why is it that military combat systems are based around BJJ and not Aikido? Why don't other MMA fighters learn AND USE Aikido? Why isn't Aikido considered an effective martial art by anyone who ACTUALLY fights? The truth is, there's NO proof Aikido works.
this looks like bad jiu jitsu - really bad jiu jitsu you can watch real matches where jiu jitsu players are really trying to beat each other - this is just more shitty aikido that wont work because the person teaching it has never had to use it against someone who knew how to fight and had their own plan to win i think aikido would be an excellent system if aikidoka would learn how to train to actually fight rather than just to look cool in demos - this doesnt even look cool to someone who trains these techniques - your arm bar is sloppy and weak and your ankle lock would stop working as soon as the other person kicked you in the face no one in this video would survive against an average bjj purple belt and its not because aikido doesnt have the techniques or the principals to be effective but because aikidoka dont train to really use what they have in the real world against real people - if you want enlightenment try buddhism - if you want MARTIAL then learn to fight
+Hunter Powers you know what - actually, at least your heading in the right direction - i applaud your efforts to integrate real fighting techniques into your system and in a few generations your school may be one of the only truly effective aikido dojo in the world. i chose to let my original comment remain because it is important and true but i realized after posting it that what you are doing with your aikido is exactly what i said needs to be done: you areworking to make your system effective. you still have a lot of work to do, but i will do my best to judge you by the progress you have made rather than by the amount of progress still ahead. best wishes to you and your school
Very good it's always Great to show the Ground Style of Aikido many forget it always had it from its relative arts.
I'm just curious with all the commentors criticising this video. What do all of you currently train in or had trained previously before?
GREAT TEACHING SENSEI ANDRADE
"We learn martial arts as helping weakness. You never fight for people to get hurt. You're always helping people." - Jackie Chan
Thank you for posting. Well done
este es un aikido del que practique en panama alli nunca se trabajo tecnicas de piso este es el aikido que me gustaria practicar
Bery good technique 💪👍🤩
Berry goodness!!!
You can watch katame-waza and sutemi-waza techniques only in seminars, special keiko. But you can't record any of these techniques, furthermore surround in class the curtains always are closed.
Katame-waza are grounding techniques and Sutemi-waza are sacrifice techniques, yes because you're sacrificing your own balance to proyect the Uke.
The same thing happen in others traditional martial arts like Daito-Ryu for example. It's really dificult to get masters to learn those kind of techniques. Maybe that why there're too many of them with lack of knowlege like this.
I am an Aikido practitioner. I am not aware of ground fighting in Aikido until I saw this clip. Can you tell me what style of Aikido this is? In with belt ranking that these groundwork techniques introduced. Is this a hybrid of Jujitsu/Aikido or pure Aikido? Thx in advances.
This is an old comment so I'm not sure if you'll read this, but Aikido does have ground grapples and locks. Look up the book Aikido and the Dynamic Sphere. It's essentially an Aikido bible. not only does it go over every concept within Aikido, but it shows all the displays of both standing grapples, and ground grapples.
Love it
i'm an aikidoka myself, and i've learned some forms of finger lock. although i've only been learning aikido for a few years, i'm advising you to please stop imagining your techniques on others outside practice. visualizing can only go so far. even if you managed to somehow lock someone's finger in a "real-fight" situation, chances are they will still knock you down... with a broken finger
thanks, i'm downloaded it
uke does not need his chiropractor any more
why are people so pissed off against aikido ? I don get it whats the problem? its just another martial art. If you don't like it, don't practice it
Landing a throw like at 2:43 is a sure way to get the uke to roll you over. No control there.
You don't know what is aikido. Aikdio presses befor control movements against presure.
sure, sunshine, keep telling yourself that
Do you see that tori goes first and than uke attacks? Shouldn't it be opposite?
***** if you look very closely as uke ( attacker) comes into attack tori ( defender ) enters quickly to seize that attack then goes straight into a technique that's how it works ?
***** Hi Bakir, Not necessarily So; In Aikido the underlying understanding and/or application of "Omote" and "Ura" can vary from style to style.
In "Omote" form you can actually initiate the attack - In fact when ever possible one should apply "Omote" rather than "Ura" if the conflict can not be avoided. The Ura is the last resort when you did not have the chance to react or initiate taking the control early on. Some styles practice far more "Ura" than "Omote" which may result in weaker overall posture, though the soft side will be trained more. (Said in another way; If you train more Omote you will utilize all your combined ""Strength/Power"" untill you are faced with the stronger opponent - Then you utilizes the "Ura").
Secondary the sensitivity and thereby the reaction speed when the opponent is attacking can be very quick for an experienced Aikido Practitioner - Like sensing the attack in a blitz (or essentially in the very same moment) and you will already be on to the "receiving/engaging" of the attack.
In the perfect blending all the other factors of the situation (surroundings, Number of opponents etc.) will determine your Ura or Omote choice - So if one has not trained the Omote properly then it will be much more difficult to advance or take the initiative and with bad Ura Skills one is certainly subject to go down to a stronger opponent. One could say that the Ura form is obvious Expression of Aikido, but more even so the Omote Form should be trained to get the best of your physical and mental possibilities, before relying on the Ura.
With good and steady training over a long time period still many people would think they have the upper hand over you in a dire situation - with Omote well trained, such situations will end before they even have begun. While one must never underestimate anybody it is for sure that opponents that in fact are weaker than you does not need to be given any chances at all for any openings. And for the stronger and much more dangerous opponents the teaching of Aikido is more or less obvious to practitioners of the Aikido.
---
He might look a bit early on in this video, but as such it´s not way off.
I enjoy many of the videos I watch but even more entertaining are the comments. I read a lot of BJJ people on this one. I give great credit to the BJJ system and those who train it and yes, your ground will be (and should be) better than what you see from other arts. Why wouldn't it that is 100% of your skills as were other arts maybe 25% or even less is groundwork. I respect BJJ skills but I am aware that it is only a small slice of a larger pie. Discounting all other things, as many (if not most or all) Bjj people do could be placing too many eggs into one basket. Yes, as far as I know, BJJ is at the top of the ground game mountain but that is only the tip of the iceberg, literally. Focus on just a very small aspect you get really good at that aspect but you miss everything else. When you walk through life with blinders you only see a small part of everything around you. Most who do this feel that is all they need to see and that's ok, no skin off my nose. But why feel the need to always poke and jab at something you can't really see anyway. One day each person who does this will walk up to a piece of brown fur and poke it, only later will they realize it is a bear, and all you have is that very thin and small stick.
Prove to me that you reduce 50% of their power. What equation did you use for this?
does a aikido person have chance on the ground with a high skilled ground fighter, like judo or jujitsu or other?
yes, if he "is high skilled ground fighter" :)
Not at all. The assumption in traditional Aikido - which this is not - is that the opponent is always armed.Most judo and jujitsu work on the assumption its all empty handed. This is both a plus and minus for Aikido. So Aikido's movements and responses are based on uke has an edged weapon which makes ground fighting a losing proposition.
What kind of arm bar is that? at 6:40?
A very badly executed one.
+Ezi0AuditoreDiFirenz I believe the point of that armbar is to make it harder for the opponent to bite your leg while you do it, compared to a regular Judo/BJJ armbar.
At least he tapped
There're so many schools of aikido.
The link isn't working. What Army did you serve in? In the U.S. Military, MACP and MCMAP don't use Aikido.
it looks more a jujutsu with an Aikido preoyection, i think is not necesary the grundwork if you make a good proyection and aikido tecnique
We've been over this. I can't travel to Baku. You come to America and we'll settle this.
They don't allow it because of the gloves. It's a difficult technique when you have gloves on. Also, you're not going to incpacitate my whole body just because you have my finger. There's more than one way to take someone down. One can take someone down even while their opponent is controlling their entire arm or hand, so a finger is not a big deal.
I train Aikikai Aikido, and I've never seen these done in a dojo. More like Jiu Jitsu, I think
HorridFroth this is tenshin aikido did you read when this video first startedjiu jitsu has similar techniques ?
igiboy1989
Funny you should mention, I started BJJ about 3 months ago. It compliments Aikido well, but I think that the best possible combo for street readiness is Kickboxing and BJJ these days. They just seem to ready a person for real combat far more than any other combination of styles.
igiboy1989
Nice post. Very sensible.
@@HorridFrothin my opinion the best way to get fight ready is wrestling, I can’t wait to blend my background in wrestling with aikido. Aikido is an amazing system I’ve been bouncing for years.
Aikido defenses against kicks
You're kidding, right? You can grap your opponents wrist for wrist locks. Why don't I see Anderson doing any Aikido wrist throws in his fights? When someone kicks Silva, why don't I see him defend like and Aikidoka? Why is it that there has not been 1 single Aikidoka to prove himself effective in
Esto no es aikido, cuando se hace una neutralizacion
Well when my family came here, we came with relative ease actually.
the only one that looks effective is the Shiho Nage to armbar...
MMA, you only need to tap out once. Aikido, you need to tap out 3 times. Kids play in the MMA. Men pacify with Aikido! :D
hang99 with mma you are watched by a referee to look for that submission tap that's why they only tap once, in this video as you can see attacker is doing it 3 times to show you that pressure is been applied there isn't anything wrong with this. on the street there's no tap just a snap have noticed that the man in his video sounds like bas rutten maybe it is him ?
muito bom ........ Good.........
Well if it is not selfdefence what is the point of learning this, then aikido becomes a sport and like master Ueshiba said Aikido is budo and not a sport. Sport or grappling has regulations and rules. I don't say that the performer isn't skilled, I only don't see the point in this.
Uke tappin like Neil Peart 😭
This video is not about "real selfdefense". What are you complaining about?
So because you have one of my fingers locked, I an't strike you with my other hand, my legs, my head, etc? I think I can. Also, you pushing forward would give me the momentum to throw. Another thing, you think that you can armbar a BJJ/Judo practitioner? Aikidoka can't even do armbars correctly...
That link didn't work. Also, yes they are. If his Aikido techniques worked, he would use them. Most of the techniques I saw in this video are legal in MMA. Why doesn't Silva use them? The truth is, Segal has never proven himself as an effective fighter outside of movies. He's never actually been a fighter.
Hardly by 50%. If somehow you we able to lock my finger before I took you down (highly unlikely) I would just strike you with a free limb. I've seen people trying to strike while in Kimura locks before.
These look like BJJ techniques rather than traditional aikido. Just sayin
Aikido was based off Japanese jujitsu and is an older system than bjj. Read up that’s classic tenshin aikido
This is very skilful and practical but you realise that it cannot be called Aikido anymore. It is rather classical jiujitsu that includes newaza in its curriculum. Some styles of Aikido have some sutemi waza techniques but pure newaza has nothing to do with Aikido, whatsoever. I understand the necessity of attracting new students in this era of modern martial arts, MMA, combat arts like Systema becoming more and more popular but Aikido is very traditional and specific form of self-defence.
This is aikido, aikido was based on Japanese jujitsu, which is also what bjj was based on. These are classic principles of tenshin aikido.
I totally dislike pre arranged shows even to demonstrate tecniques however Akido practicioners do know how to inflict damadging locks even on the ground or standup against wall etc .
There are lots of money in the UFC so why don't aikido masters go and collect them? !!!!!
this is not aikido nor part of aikido syllabus
+Chris Chiang Yes it is it's
+Jeff Ruffner point me to the IAF syllabus then.
+Chris Chiang it's Aiki-based movements utilizing the principles of Aikido. Forget about a specific syllabus. A: you may not be familiar with every Aikido form and school and hence their specific syllabus. B: a syllabus is not a style, it is simply a tool to teach the principles of a style.
Did u see o sensei doing an arm bar? I wonder
Does Aikido technique have to stop with movements only performed by O Sensei? Besides, isn't Rokkyo an armbar?
It's really not that hard to come to the U.S. actually...
You should learn how to observe. Look at Silva's fights! In not 1 of his fights does he use Aikido! He only uses BJJ and Muay Thai!
Except this isn't BJJ. This is NOTHING like BJJ.
You're kidding, right? Look at Silvas fights, not 1 of his techniques used in his fights is an Aikido technique, it's all BJJ and Muay Thai.
I fail to see how your comment is relevant to mine, but alright, fair enough. It's ironic that i see you are content in "running around" here though. oh well, to each their own. have a good day then sir
Ok
i see what's the problem here.you are being too defensive. a true martial artist always keep an open mind and is humble, regardless of how far he has mastered his discipline or art. Each and every argument you made before just lost its credibility. i can't see you being other than an overly proud practitioner
thats right,it aint aikido and its isnt impressive when theres no resistance,it takes very little skill to do anything in that clip.Its also stupid to go to the ground with someone after you just thrown them cleanly.
rrriiiiight... but sorry,no, Seagal was a great Aikido practitioner, still is, but Silva came to him not to learn Aikido. At least not specifically
nice technique for playing with your children.....
I bet this dumbass regrets this comment after getting a kneebar or two lmfao
There is plenty to complain about: First technique 0:43 why he is already surrendering the fight? 5:21 why again he is simply surrendering him self to this idiotic technique? Why the guy with hakama didn't ended on the floor after extremely easy/obvious punch with right hand/elbow that should land on the face of this wanna be Aikido master? The guy in hakama is breaking basic rules of Budo so it can't be called Aikido.
I'm not sending you anything. Get a passport and find some way over here.
Don't just follow a martial art you see on youtube and assume it's effective. This is some of the worst groundwork ever.
Nobody stops you from adding ground techniques to your Aikido curriculum, but frankly doing that in Hakama is stupid.
Dump the Hakama if you want to play Gracy jujutsu.
You do understand that bjj was based on Japanese jujitsu right? And that aikido is older than bjj? These are classic techniques don’t know why that triggers you lol
You should not be teaching ground work.
I would love to see an aikido video in which their training dummy actually actively resists instead of just rag-dolling themselves.
Aikido is dumb, aikido doesn't work
+Michael R. usually in aikido first you are learning techniques based on actual attack. When you are resisting you've just stopped or changed your attack - in most dojos they learn how to control resisting opponent and change technique(oyo henka) after few years of training.
Sorry for my english, hope I had written clearly.
But the thing is most, if not all of these techniques will not work on an actively resisting opponent. Of all the aikido that i have seen both in person and through videos it consists of a partner who is either standing still letting the other person apply the technique or them running into the other letting the apply the technique. The best kind of techniques are the ones in which you can perform them on someone who does not want them to be performed on them. Aikido does not have that, let alone they do not even have sparring or rolling. Without that element you do not know if you will be able to perform them in any type of situation outside of the dojo
Aikido does not work
You all think it doesnt works, its fake. You are just to lazy to visit an aikido dojo.
ANY combat situation outside of movies? Why is it that military combat systems are based around BJJ and not Aikido? Why don't other MMA fighters learn AND USE Aikido? Why isn't Aikido considered an effective martial art by anyone who ACTUALLY fights? The truth is, there's NO proof Aikido works.
this looks like bad jiu jitsu - really bad jiu jitsu
you can watch real matches where jiu jitsu players are really trying to beat each other - this is just more shitty aikido that wont work because the person teaching it has never had to use it against someone who knew how to fight and had their own plan to win
i think aikido would be an excellent system if aikidoka would learn how to train to actually fight rather than just to look cool in demos - this doesnt even look cool to someone who trains these techniques - your arm bar is sloppy and weak and your ankle lock would stop working as soon as the other person kicked you in the face
no one in this video would survive against an average bjj purple belt and its not because aikido doesnt have the techniques or the principals to be effective but because aikidoka dont train to really use what they have in the real world against real people - if you want enlightenment try buddhism - if you want MARTIAL then learn to fight
+Hunter Powers you know what - actually, at least your heading in the right direction - i applaud your efforts to integrate real fighting techniques into your system and in a few generations your school may be one of the only truly effective aikido dojo in the world. i chose to let my original comment remain because it is important and true but i realized after posting it that what you are doing with your aikido is exactly what i said needs to be done: you areworking to make your system effective. you still have a lot of work to do, but i will do my best to judge you by the progress you have made rather than by the amount of progress still ahead. best wishes to you and your school
How does look bad aikdio ? Yes ,it is? It is jiu jitsu.
+POST Mokia armband with a leg under his head, not enough control, usually this doesn't work in a real match, have tried before .
+Roman Chumachenko Armbar*
Oh? OK. I'm curious though. What do you currently train in? Or what have you previously practiced?