Makes me wonder how many times people have to keep proving this to actually make it catch on and be like Yeah this is actually a thing we're going to admit this
I completely agree. They have "Grader Notes" that clarifies any defects, but only available with Express service or higher ($149/card+). I think they're taking for granted their reputation. Thanks for watching.
It’s sad to see PSA having these issues, I saw a video showing Psa grading vintage cards lower than they used to grade vintage cards. Cards that would get a 4 now getting 2.5 everyone is looking at Psa as the leading card grading company and we want them to be they just need to be consistent with grading but with the volume they get it’s almost impossible to do and not take a year to grade the cards .
@johnthe3rd440 I completely, 100% agree. With their cost (highest in the industry) and not being the most consistent with their grading, it's crazy how a lot of people, including myself at times, see them as tops of the industry. There are a few companies out there making a name for themselves, doing the right thing, for the right cost, getting overlooked because of (graded items') market value.
Thank you 🤙 I just wish I didn't have to submit them twice (twice the cost and twice the turnaround time). I feel their cost (up) and consistency (down) are just going the opposite directions. Thank you for watching.
Hey InfiniteJay...thank you for watching the video. Cracking a card and resubmitting it is not necessarily recommended > can it still be profitable if it comes back the same grade (if flipping), time & money (grading cost), condition of card?...these are the main factors I would consider. As far as the numbered cards, it's really irrelevant. Two of the cards I have on this video were numbered and resubmitted (GG Jackson /99 & Bilal Coulibaly /25). PSA has two offices (CA & NJ) and has so many graders and cards coming in, they really won't have the time to look at individual numbered cards. That's probably why the inconsistency grading occurs...lol. I hope this helps. Thanks again.
I'm cracking slabs because I feel like PSA graders are not doing a thorough enough job grading cards. I'm not a professional grader (I don't think they're are either...lol) but just too many inconsistencies that's why I did this. I don't really like doing it 'cause it'll cost too much and too long...unless it's obvious and if the price difference is big enough. But I agree with you 100% that 9's are just as much, sometimes less, than raw. They need to be more consistent if they're going to raise their prices. Thanks for watching.
@@IslanderDood not saying cracking slabs are bad I get it with the consistency of psa I would to but you need to take the cert numbers out of circulation and I no 90% of people don't wich is the reason why pop counts are screwed and you just can't trust them 9 values from psa just my opinion as a collector it's just another thing that is bad for this hobby
@72jmunoz ohhh... that makes sense. Please don't take offense to my response...not my intention at all. You have valid points. I apologize if it did. But, I agree it is not good for the hobby. 9's have gone down on value so much (except for the pre-2000's; before all these chrome cards started poppin' out). Thank you for the heads up 🤙
@marcf3343 You are 100% right. I don't think they care at all. I don't really like cracking slabs...too costly and too risky. I see other YT'ers do it, and I wanted to see for myself. Thanks for watching.
Yea, right?..probably because they graded my cards lower than I wanted (hurt my pride a little bit...lol). Fortunately, they came back higher and I was able to sell them for more...thanks for watching.
That's why I started submitting to SGC again. I feel they're more consistent with their grading (at least from my past experience), less expensive, and a whole lot faster turnaround. I'll be able to flip my cards more frequently. Thank you for watching 🤙
Makes me wonder how many times people have to keep proving this to actually make it catch on and be like Yeah this is actually a thing we're going to admit this
Great video. It's a bummer that the #1 Grading company is so inconsistent. They definitely need tow work on that.
Oh yes they do...especially them raising their prices.
Thank you for watching.
Cool
Video. Subscribed. I have a plan to take like 20 9’s and resubmit just to see lol guarantee get like 9 gems
Great video, thanks for sharing.
Thank you! I'll be doing more in the future 🤙
I think PSA should provide their 4 grades of the card. I will not submit to PSA again, I'm trying CGC now. Thanks for the video✌
I completely agree. They have "Grader Notes" that clarifies any defects, but only available with Express service or higher ($149/card+). I think they're taking for granted their reputation. Thanks for watching.
lol if its for your pc go for it but resell good luck lol
It’s sad to see PSA having these issues, I saw a video showing Psa grading vintage cards lower than they used to grade vintage cards. Cards that would get a 4 now getting 2.5 everyone is looking at Psa as the leading card grading company and we want them to be they just need to be consistent with grading but with the volume they get it’s almost impossible to do and not take a year to grade the cards .
@johnthe3rd440 I completely, 100% agree. With their cost (highest in the industry) and not being the most consistent with their grading, it's crazy how a lot of people, including myself at times, see them as tops of the industry. There are a few companies out there making a name for themselves, doing the right thing, for the right cost, getting overlooked because of (graded items') market value.
Started buying pre-graded. Seems to work out better for me when I let other people do the work. Ha!
Nice new sub 👍🏼
Thank you 🤙 I just wish I didn't have to submit them twice (twice the cost and twice the turnaround time). I feel their cost (up) and consistency (down) are just going the opposite directions. Thank you for watching.
Very inconsistent grading. This last submission i got back was the last time doing business with psa. Beckett for resale cards and TAG for my pc.
Oh, a 100%. I also agree with pc's. They're yours to keep anyway. TAG (or even Arena) has better-looking slabs.
Silly question here , would you recommend cracking a card that’s numbered ? Like wouldn’t they know that card came in already due to the number ?
Hey InfiniteJay...thank you for watching the video. Cracking a card and resubmitting it is not necessarily recommended > can it still be profitable if it comes back the same grade (if flipping), time & money (grading cost), condition of card?...these are the main factors I would consider. As far as the numbered cards, it's really irrelevant. Two of the cards I have on this video were numbered and resubmitted (GG Jackson /99 & Bilal Coulibaly /25). PSA has two offices (CA & NJ) and has so many graders and cards coming in, they really won't have the time to look at individual numbered cards. That's probably why the inconsistency grading occurs...lol. I hope this helps. Thanks again.
It’s crazy that PSA is the worst third party grader when it comes to grading lmao
So youre cracking slabs are you pulling cert numbers from psa so pop count on the 9s are not screwed thats the main reason 9s are dam near worth raw 🤔
I'm cracking slabs because I feel like PSA graders are not doing a thorough enough job grading cards. I'm not a professional grader (I don't think they're are either...lol) but just too many inconsistencies that's why I did this. I don't really like doing it 'cause it'll cost too much and too long...unless it's obvious and if the price difference is big enough.
But I agree with you 100% that 9's are just as much, sometimes less, than raw. They need to be more consistent if they're going to raise their prices. Thanks for watching.
@@IslanderDood not saying cracking slabs are bad I get it with the consistency of psa I would to but you need to take the cert numbers out of circulation and I no 90% of people don't wich is the reason why pop counts are screwed and you just can't trust them 9 values from psa just my opinion as a collector it's just another thing that is bad for this hobby
@72jmunoz ohhh... that makes sense. Please don't take offense to my response...not my intention at all. You have valid points. I apologize if it did. But, I agree it is not good for the hobby. 9's have gone down on value so much (except for the pre-2000's; before all these chrome cards started poppin' out).
Thank you for the heads up 🤙
Pretty pathetic that they care so little to realize a numbered card was already graded. Worthless service with 0 integrity.
@marcf3343 You are 100% right. I don't think they care at all. I don't really like cracking slabs...too costly and too risky. I see other YT'ers do it, and I wanted to see for myself. Thanks for watching.
stop it.
Why give them your money then? definition of insanity.
Yea, right?..probably because they graded my cards lower than I wanted (hurt my pride a little bit...lol). Fortunately, they came back higher and I was able to sell them for more...thanks for watching.
Why support a scam?
That's why I started submitting to SGC again. I feel they're more consistent with their grading (at least from my past experience), less expensive, and a whole lot faster turnaround. I'll be able to flip my cards more frequently. Thank you for watching 🤙
@@IslanderDoodSGC got bought out by PSA if I am not mistaken
@@johnthierry5864not by PSA, but by their parent company, Collectors Holding. So, technically, they are sister companies now.
The difference between a PSA 9 and a PSA 10 is the submitter’s last name.
100 %
Stop being a baby!
Was it that obvious? It's what I do every time I get my cards back from them...lol. Thank you for watching 🤙