MacBook Pro M1 vs MacBook Pro i9 - Speed Test Review
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024
- The new Apple Silicon M1 Processor for MacBook is super fast, but is it faster than its more expensive rival the Intel i9 Processor on a MacBook Pro?
In this video I put the new Apple MacBook Pro M1 vs MacBook Pro i9 in a speed test comparison to review which one is really the fastest. I test them while booting up and opening a variety of popular apps. I also export video files from a video editor and run benchmark tests like Geekbench 5 and Cinebench R23 on both devices.
Get the #1 MacBook Accessory - amzn.to/3M2jy4E
Follow Serg-Tech
- Instagram - / serg.tech
- Facebook - / sergtechman
My Gear
- Camera - amzn.to/2DuPJbV
- Lighting Kit - amzn.to/2DqOKoI
- Microphone - amzn.to/2DWnDTV
- Video Editor - amzn.to/2sRfXxK
Disclaimer: Links in the description are typically affiliate links that let you help support the channel at no extra cost.
![Best $1300 Gaming PC Build 2024! 😄 [ft. RX 7900 GRE & Ryzen 7600 w/ Benchmarks]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Pos_NVQdXto/mqdefault.jpg)
Get the #1 MacBook Accessory - amzn.to/3M2jy4E
M1 Processor was much more faster than Intel i9 Processor
OMG in geekbench 5 test M1 Processo just use 8 second Intel i9 Processor used 40 second
5X faster.
Even though I'm a Windows user that was quite impressive with the M1
Hello! I clicked on the link to purchase the accessory but the accessory is not on the website. Do you still have this item for purchase? Thanks!
I Wondering.. What are they doing all these years Intel?
Money
😂😂
While people think that what they provide is the best they can get, they try roll along. Same as the history of most nations before globalisation, internet, social media... And some populations still roll that way ignorant about the fact that the world has moved on, and their government eat on their ignorance.
@@danielillo132435 Baam!!!
Gust getting bully
Just to point this out, this is not exactly a fair test, both machines need to have at least the same apps installed, a fresh install “out of the box” would be fair since there may be some applications running in the background which may influence execution times
Yeah it not fair intel one have 32GB of ram but M1 only 8GB and mb16 cost over 2000 dollars but M1 only 1200 dollars this is unfair comparison
@@Matteuccishane hahahahaha
@Mudduluru Sahil Varma Vaels International School price matter for comparison video. What are you on ? I don't get it
Actually all of those apps need to be ported to work on m1 so it’s comparing apples to oranges.. the
m1 is definitely more optimised than i9 but when it comes to raw power it fails.
This is not windows
m1 playing 8k footage where as my laptop struggling to even play 1080p😂
You lucky, my sh!t intel celeron barely can run 720p.
@@jessicahyde8461 lol😂
@@jessicahyde8461 I thought my HP Envy with a Nvidia MX250 and an i7 was a potato, but I was completely wrong, well it is at gaming, but not at 4k video. Btw AMD is much much better.
@Jesus christ M1 is definately at the top, under that is the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X.
@Jesus christ nah m8, but I‘d still take AMD anyday until Intel does something thats better.
Do you understand that opening an app is not processing speed that’s solid state speed? LOL.
Whatever that is, opening app is everyday things users do. I don't care how fast is your processor or your SSD, but when they got a lack in a moment, I don't like it. Each person has their preferences, but for me, waiting for a bit when I open my i9 laptop is not a good thing.
He’s an idiot, 8gb vs 16gb of ram, that’s an advantage for the i9, lol
Well that depends one the soc too
he also probably has way more things on his i9 lmaooo
Depends. Launching an executable can be quite complex and involve many things such as CPU clock cycle, cache memory speed (esp if the same executable was recently launched), and yes it can significantly depend on SSD/HDD data transfer rate if the program reads/writes files from/to disk.
hey bro, in your opinion which is better for editing on a Final Cut Pro? Have a 15' 2014 macbook pro and it freezes up a bit when dragging long clips, recording audio, and things like that
Probably the m1.
u for real?
@@kelloxx makes sense. It is optimized for the m1 chip.
Bro switch to premiere
@@LelynMac hahahaha that's the real talk
annoying background music
That SD Card test was influenced by the max speed of the card itself. Not the internal USC-C controller speed.
Amazing test but one thing i would like to add. Big sur is optimised only for m1. So if u had mojave or catalina on the intel MBP I’m sure u wud get much faster speeds and also better thermals. For me after i downgraded from big sur to mojave on my intel MBP, its so much more snappier and the temps on average stay 10-15 degrees lower
How do you downgrade ur Mac OS
blha blha blha stfu apple fan boiii
Can you really downgrade to mojave?
IS it possible to downgrade?
That's true... Is more of the software. Doesn't matter how good to hardware is, if it can't communicate well with the os
The one area that the i9 won (exporting video file), would the fact that it was working with 32GB of RAM have given it a bigger advantage over the 8GB of RAM on the M1?
No, better GPU ram hardly matters for rendering
@@JqMarsh no, M1 better then i9 for rendering
@@HakkinenRUS No, I have the M1 Mac Pro 13 Inch 16gb ram and the Asus Nvidia 3050 Ti, I7 11800H and 16gb ram. I have tested the rendering speeds with CPU only, Gpu and the Integreated one on the I7. I upscaled 108060p to 4k60p, CPU only rendering the I7 beat the M1. My second test was with Nvidia and the M1 Graphics Card, the Nvidia smoked the M1. The only thing that the M1 beat was the IGpu of the I7.
Great video, that being said, I would argue that this is not a fair test as the 15" has 32gb of ram that would dramatically help for exporting time. I tested a fully loaded M1 MBP and a fully loaded 16" and for rendering the 16" inch came out slightly above and for exporting they were the same. You also put them next to each other, one could argue that the 15" did not get the coolest air and therefore could not max out the i9 as that matching is already having difficulties cooling the i9 beast. I would love to continue this conversation.
I would also say that both macs appeared to already have files and apps on them. the i9 seemed to have more files and even a second account on it which could account for the slightly slower boot time and load speeds.
@@justinkaufman495 2 years later but... Also, youre talking about DDR4 2400 MHz chip array VS DDR5 6400 MHz integrated/onboard CPU RAM. This test is really only showing how fast the SSD can dump data into the RAM that it has access to. To really test these two, he needs to render something. He'll find that the i9 is about on par with the M1 at a much heavier power draw.
@@jameysummers1577 yeah since then I've bought a 2019 i5, and I haven't had any preformance issues running windows, and beamNG for days. It heats up a little, but after mapping the fans to kick on at a reasonable temperature instead of the 90°C apple had it set to I haven't had heat issues.
thank you couldnt find any comparsion video for similary priced mcbooks mbp 16 inch and mba m1 all are mostly comparing with the m1 pro which is bound to be better, but also a bit expensive, wanted to see if i9 performas any better because it was a top model back in 2019
Their bussiness logic should be selling a stroing m1 macbook in lower price in order to spread the market of m1 quickly.
Didn't they do that? The m1 MacBooks seem a bit cheaper
32Gb vs 8gb ram. I was wondering why M1 lost in the video editing section 😂😂
No dedicated graphics card.
@@Michael-Martell M1 is gpu and cpu
@@lol-ws6po what he meant was, that system with dedicated gpus are more powerful in video editing.
risc processors do not work in the same way with ram as x86. in other words, they do not need much ram to do the same.
@Rob Mahl risc processors depend more of cache, not RAM. So look the amount of cache each have
You provided a good comparison with what you had available. Of course this isn't exactly "apples" to "apples", but it is helpful nevertheless. I was hoping to see how Photoshop runs, but I can get a pretty good idea that the M1 will be a better choice for that. Thanks.
Just an observation but it looks like you have a lot more on your pro 16. I’m sure that makes a difference. Maybe if you have all of the same applications installed and rigged the exact same way it would be a truer representation of the difference. Would be nice to see.
Though it does have an effect it is fairly negligible, and not to mention the i9 had double the ram which is a pretty big advantage
@@samblanton967 Quadruple the RAM! The i9 had 32gb, the M1 had just 8GB!
@@CaptainDarling2020 lol it depends the option he took
It's an SSD... no seek times.
i just buyed Macbook pro with Intel
and after watching this video Im very SAD 😔
return it?
u can try for a return and buy a new m1 at a lower price
Intel is okay by itself, don't worry, there is always something better than yours
It's not actually a fair comparison in the video, although the m1 is faster, but the pro intel is not that terrible... also various softwares are still yet to release supports m1, so you're still in the safe side
Now is 10/2021 its all your problem stupid at spending money
Good review, i’m still waiting for the 16 inch MacBook Pro M1 processor
Same
Yes me too
Same here
I think the editing where M1 is behind i9 is because the Final Cut pro has not been optimized for M1 yet.
Plus RAM matters, if M1 has 8GB then its not fair at all
The i9 has 32gb RAM. Vs 8gb RAM in the M1.
@@jessicawitkamp5226 13 inch starts from 8GB up to 16, i9 one starts from 16 GB if M1 one was upgraded to 16GB RAM and i9 one was the entry level, then it is fair.
@@randomperson1408 I totally agree with you. But its crazy that without rendering, so only M1 vs Intel, its still faster!
@@randomperson1408 Off topic question, but would a 64gb i9 beat the 16gb m1? Prolly a dumb question.
Nice camparison my man .. great
Thanks as always bro
I want to see someone run an 8k video for about 15 minutes and then see which one is performing best/
The m1.
Intel
@@balasuriyar1711 your mom
@@BlueHawk80 😂😂😂😂😂
ofc the intel because it own a dedicated GPU and made for profesional
M1 might be faster in some cases, however, the i9 is still a beast. It’s nothing like editing on a 16 inch screen. 13 inch would be nice for my daughter.
Bruh
:/ who is gonna tell him
This is so true
1000$, with the whole laptop around and its faster IN SOME CASES than the top notch i9.
you really don't get it
@Russian Roulette You mean people like you?
Obvious thing that Apple book can support its own processor too
Wow, it's mind-blowing fact right there!!!
When I bought my i9 16 inch MacBook pro I did know that the M1 was coming, but I honestly never would have believed you if you told me that the next MacBook Air would basically be faster than it! Amazing progress. Still, I am very happy with my big and luscious 16 inch MPB and it hasn't actually become any slower, the new MacBooks have just got more powerful - this laptops wipes the floor with what I need it to do....
Where do you see it's faster ? It takes 1 less second to open stuff but twice the time for actual work on Final Cut
The i9 is faster when plugged in in almost all circumstances, the M1 is faster on battery power and for apple native apps
@@flaviotaneli144 32gb ram.
@@adamnash3491 m1 is just amazing and much more worth it imo. Zero fan noise, no heat, I have never experienced lag on the m1 after a year, but have had lag ALL the time with the i9 when coding
Great comparison, but I think matched RAM for your comparison units would really isolate the processor effect. Any chance the iMovie export times were affected RAM capacity of the machine (I don't export video, but am curious how this test might translate to spreadsheet work)?
Yes i do that shizz 24/7 32 gb better than 8gb of ram
the trackpad is huge on the 16 inch
Its also distorted in this video, its huge, but not thaaaat huge
did you know that the Final Cut uses the GPU to process and render video so when you export a video, you're not testing CPU speeds but GPU's? Any ways, great video.
he is dumb even with exporting shit its based on read/write speed of SSD.
What did he say at 9:48 ...
@@baderalbader5740 No, it's really not bottlenecked by the SSD speed.
Also, Intel Iris vs M1 graphics is a valuable comparison to make regardless.
Nice video. I going to buy a second hand i9 simply because I can't afford the M1 16 inch. The 13 inch m1 that is within my price tolerance is to small. I prefer more screen real estate. Nice video it made my decision much easier 🙏
To be fair, boot and opening up applications at the beginning relies mostly on the SSD, as the SSD read speeds are typically the bottle neck. Since apple is making their own processor, and know exactly what is in the machines they’re building, they can optimize the boot/loading of applications. The render speed on the M1 was likely bottle necked by the difference in ram, so that’s also not a fair test.. at the end of the day, apple is going to optimize the crap out of their chips, raw processing power is obviously lower than intel or amd, but the hardware optimizations that they get from making the mb, processor, graphics card etc are really playing a huge role.
How about using M1 Max new Chip for Animation and 3D software purposes ?
@@auroraskydreams166 to be honest, I use my windows work station for 3D graphics that I use for game dev - blender, and I have not even tried using a mac for it because the rest of game dev is much easier on Windows than Mac in general.. I would do some research into it, because I’m sure someone out there has tested it. In general these M1 series chips have been great! Especially for web dev/mobile dev. But that’s my area of interest so thats what I know. Sorry I couldn’t be of much help 🤷♂️
I think there is more than that to it, I've got a 2013 macbook air, and when I wipe it each year, it can do boot and open safari faster than both of those. But give it 6 months of use, and its slower. To do an apples to apples comparison (ahhh puns) you'd need to freshly wipe each of the machines. At that point I'd agree with you whole heartedly as not only do they have faster SSDs in the M1 MacBooks, they are have more direct access.
You gotta retry some of your benchmarks with the 16gb m1. Max Tech did a comparison, and 8k video edit took half the speed on a 16gb m1 than it did on an 8gb. the i9 he used rendered in 5:30, the m1 16GB rendered in 5:59, and the 8GB rendered in 13:57. Some of the tests had negligible results, but I stopped watching once I realized you were using an 8gb :(.
Same, why bother testing them if your not going to do it right.
Wouldn’t the RAM difference from the i9 MacBook make a difference in video editing? That’s probably why it lost that round cause it has double the RAM and that matters when exporting as well as so many other things
He also failed to mention the 13 inch M1 has no dedicated GPU while the 16 inch i9 has a Radeon card even at base models. Video rendering, scrubbing, and editing all rely on a good GPU
@@cloud9821 i mean thats the whole point of the m1 macbook, its gpu and cpu
So if you had 32 gigs of ram on the M1 it would completely smoke the shit of the Intel. Do I have that right? lol
not really, risc proccesors do not use as much as ram.
I don’t understand why the i9 is over a thousand dollars more if the m1 is superior
It should run faster complex programs
The i9 was basically as good as you could get on a laptop before the M1that’s why. No one but Apple really thought Apple’s first chipset for laptops was going to be this powerful.
@@LuigiEspositoGraphic No it wont, dont spread false informations wtf is complex program
Becouse it's outdated and due to be replaced soon
@@danielnowak6504 I'm not spreading any false infos, complex program such as games or industrial gpu related programs.
Excellent objective and fair review. It answered my questions.
Too bad the M1 Processor is not available on the MacBook Pro 16 inches. I would've purchase it ..
Yeah I looked all over online and they don’t sell the M1 for Macbook 16in
@@shawn4626 They have an arm based one now!!!!
In the latest MacBook pro 14 and 16 inch, it can support m1 PRO and m1 MAX
I chose intel in case of better multitasking.
On my custom build computer (which is 95% percentile faster then world) I use i5-11600k with 5.9GHz.
So for example with running windows and and opened RUclips with 4k I’m getting only 1-2% usage.
You did a great job bro thx for the video👍
I don’t think the rendering was fair since video rendering takes a lot of RAM usage, you have 4 times the ram as the M1 on your i9 which is probably why it got done so much faster
@@tylerdurden783 its 32gb bra
@@TopKilla3 yes 32 is 4x8
A bigger screen technically does require more power to display the same resolution as a smaller screen.
What? 😂
It's an imperceptible difference, and that's being generous. It wouldn't affect performance at all.
A few things to consider: The i9 MacBook has 2 noisy fans and runs extremely hot under load and thermal throttles very badly
And some apps aren't updated for M1 chips.
You forgot the most important aspect of the M1 which is the power draw which must be less than half the Macbook I9
as a musician there's a tonne of hard/software that doesn't like the M1 chip yet.
Great video thank you. You should also start this videos with 100% battery and then show what the percentage was at the end! It looks like the i9 used much more battery power than the m1.
Yes, that is true. M1 is power efficient, i9 consumes a lot of power.
is the M1 you tested the basic configuration?
M1 is newer technology and is apples technology not someone else’s. I did a very in-depth video on The M1. It’s an amazing machine
Yes, the M1 comes in 8GB RAM or 16GB and he had the 8GB.
I am torn between i9 16 inch and m1 13 inch. I got the m1 and it’s still within the time frame to return. I9 is on sale for 2449. I got the m1 16 gb and 1 tb ssd. I love the m1 but the bigger screen better speakers and more ports plus a graphics card. I just don’t know which way to go. I have a few days ldft
same dilemma... and then, do we wait for the m1x 14 inch?
Did you change it for the i9? Same, not sure which to go for...
@@karenjane6134 I kept the m1 and love it. Stays so cool and battery lasts forever! Performance is awesome and the speakers are great as well as the screen resolution.
The M1 was made to be used with low power. It runs the same whether it's plugged in or not. You've severely handicapped the i9 CPU and it's not even performing at half its speed. Plug it in and rerun the tests. Plug them both in and rerun the tests and I guarantee you'll have a much different experience.
Lies
to be fair the M1 mac seemed to have less files and one less user account on it. also the M1 chip is designed specifically for MacOS whereas the i9 is multiplatform. I've personally noticed better performance when using windows with my MBP (it's been that way since as long as I can remember and as far back as my original nonretina 2012 MBP with a Core i7.) another thing is thermals. in terms of thermal performance apple liked their reputation for sleek quiet devices meaning that the fans don't kick on until you're already throttling. this isn't a problem for the lightweight low power M1 chip which is designed by Apple for their machines. comparing these 2 processors is like comparing apples to oranges. they really just aren't the same thing.
Speed of opening apps has probably more to do with faster storage as the newer macbook has better technology. I was surprised about video exporting, but maybe M1 did not have enough RAM which made the export slower..
Also it would be more fair to have resetted the i9, lots of files on there..
Shouldn’t the intel i9 be plugged? So that it can use the video card?
Its using it anyway. You don’t get performance drop on macOS when not plugged. It’s not windows machine.
Good review but I feel like this is a little bit unfair since both laptops are running at battery instead of AC adapter. This could cause some bias as M1 is way more energy efficient than an i9.
that would be unfair too
@@tanishkshrivastava6822 why though
all macs perform exactly the same on AC and battery, they don't change like windows laptops
@@comradeuro4255 , those people don’t care, because they believe in mac.
But apple office in NY uses windows computers. How come?
I have the macbook pro 16 and I'm quite happy with it
Very good video. I have the macbook pro i9 16' inch 1TB SSD for me it is the best laptop ever made by mac it has a lot of power its processor loads a lot of programs. Compared to the M1, the differences are small, something that doesn't bother me much... at least for a decade it will work perfectly for me with the upgrade.
32gb ram vs 8gb ram, not a fair test, but the m1 is really impressive
Yeah but the M1 has 8 GB RAM so it shows how fast it is even better. A 8GB RAM mackbook is faster than a 32 GB RAM matchbook. Thats how fast it is.
There's absolutely different because the intel one is stacked up with apps and even in i movie u got more projects
That's effects the performance not a fair comparison
Unfair to test a machine used for 2 years vs an almost new machine. A machine already used for 2 years, thermals have already started taking their toll, very much the case for i9. My i9 just got roasted a few days back for the same reason.
The earlier test, depended on the harddrive and not on the CpU. Upgrade the NVME drive of the Macbook pro and re-do the test
Can i go with macbook air m1 chip for after effects?
You certainly can! I’m not sure if After Effects has been written to run natively on Apple Silicon yet, but it will run via Rosetta 2. The only concern would be RAM. After Effects is extremely RAM intensive. You’ll still be able to get things done, but you might be limited with how much of your project can be played back in realtime. My recommendation would be to get a scratch disk to use with AE, ideally something that’s flash storage and even more ideally something that’s Thunderbolt and flash storage.
Think i9 only won the render test because of the huge RAM difference
Not that apple is optimized and need less ram..how come an old chip built with 14nm cant beat a i9 chip with 14nm tech 3 generations older
Al least this test cant be faked like max tech rene ritchie that shows number and bars that are not real.
THANKS
@@Teluric2 lots of truth. It would be nice to know which generation i9. It's not that the M1 doesn't who promise, but when he finally did something that matters - it was like watching a geo metro take on a corvette. I'd wait for the M1X if I was going to buy one but I'm guessing it wont be cheap if it does pull i9 power.
@@auggiebendoggy definetly, not faster I ve used M1 and i7 8 core mac MBP16 and clearly i7 encodes like 15 or 20% . The bigger the file its better than m1 only m1 is silent and fans are mostly quiet. I think by the time M1x is out there will be faster amd and intel laptops.
Is i9 Mac running with hdd?🙄
M1= F22 Raptor
i9= F35 Lightning II
Who’d return home unbeaten?
It’s actually F35 Lightning II
@@TheKingslayer16 who you think has it all bruh?
How many Gigs of raw both have?
32 for the i9 and 8 for the m1
As I can see from my analysis, Your i9 mac is older than the m1 from the view I can see on the keyboards. it will be more cool if you both of them are new.
Why?
@@PersonaN007Grata Because a laptop that's been in use for a significant amount of time will throw off the results, due to potentially already having applications cached (or not), or having background processes running which will adversely impact the performance of the program being tested.
Video editors still sticking to i9
The booting times of Apple computers is insanely long! The starting of apps with Big Sur and M1 was much slower, than on Intel NUC with i5-10201u.
I’d like to see this after more optimizations have been made for the m1
I have both and can cofirm the m1 is WAY superior.
I have a 16 inch 16 GB ram 2019 with core i7 and I compared to Mac air M1 8 Gb . The 16 inch is faster when it comes to Final Cut Pro. M1 air is fast on certain occasions as long as its not heavy work due to no fan installed . When it gets hot the processor goes slow on M1 . Just for your info.
THX Bro for your testing! For me as sound engineer and videograph still some questions about stability with work with Logic Pro and audio plugins. But test wit cine and geekbench are very exalting, just the rendering time is quiet different between both macs. The problem with fix SSD inside and under 1 TB nothing to do with such plugins Library`s as we have in our modern time. IMHO
Which one should I buy for gaming??
M1 is best for that
I7 or i9 as m1 has mac os so it wont support gaming some youtubers claim to play games on mac os but its just play not the real gaming.
I too is confused between i7 and m1 but as its for my father would go for m1 as he dont needs gaming
PS4/ps5. Sorry, but macs will never give you such a joy as a dedicated gaming console. I would wait for 16” m1 or m2 for work and (maybe) ps5.
@*IOETER * I did... what laptop would have been better?
Dude, 32GB RAM vs 8GB not quite a fair comparison. At least an M1 with the max available (16 GB) should have been used. (in my opinion)
Still won tho
Idiot he is showing the difference in the speed a new m1 has less gbs and the intel has 32gb it speaks volumes
@@Dedicated2WendyWilliams you just don’t get it. The increase in performance may not be sacalable. That’s why a GB to GB comparison would be better instead of implying that “twice the RAM means twice the performance”. Ideally a 32GB M1 should have been compared to a 32GB Intel Mac, but it does not exist yet. So, the next best thing to compare it to would have been a 16GB model. That’s all that comment was about. The difference would have been bigger. So sorry, I just don’t see the point of your comment other than to call someone an idiot.
damn the base m1 mbp pretty much crushed basically the (close to high-end) i9 mbp in normal real world tests and the m1 didn't even lose too much battery, the i9 lost about half maybe a little more. even though I should've upgraded to a higher spec m1 mbp, the base model is pretty good (also as seen in the test).
his tests are flawed in many regards, if you wanted to compare x86 with ARM you should go for the best M1 MacBook vs something equipped with the 11800H or 5900HX
I still take the I9 because I can bootcamp and play Windows Games
i have a pc with ryzen 9 3950x and 3070 and recently i bought a macbook pro m1 for collage and believe me it performs equal if not better than the 3950x in terms of cpu while it cannot compete the 3070 obviously so i am waiting for the 16 inch with m1 and a gpu and hope it crushes my pc and hopefully i can replace my pc :)
It is amazing to me that Apple has made a ARM processor that can even be compare to a intel i9 processor!! They compared as I expected they would though. With the ARM or M1 being faster on the initialization of a piece of software, but the running of software that requires larger amount of computing, this is where the i9 surpasses the M1, but not by a whole bunch, really!!! So the ARM M1 processor is very impressive!! You got to remember that ARM processors are the ones that are used in cell phones and tables!!!!! So for Apple to make a ARM processor that can even be compared to a intel i9 processor is just totally amazing to me!!!!!
I feel like apple would keep the price only on this model this "low" and as soon as people realize how good the procesor is they will boom the price
You're probably right. But they wouldn't do it outright, that's too obvious. They'd probably hide the price increase behind some gimmicky feature to "justify" it.
Thats why i need to get me one asap
A great comparision
Thanks!
Please test this counting prime numbers. The ultimate test
you cant compare a 13in with a 15in. a 15in has more pixels to process and bigger resolution to process.
But like, the video he exported has the same resolution...
the screen size does not matter, if the resolution runs at the same settings on both machines.
@@endmymiseryyy7908 screen size does matter actually. More pixels, different resolution.
@@raijin199 ohh does those models have different resolutions? cause my 24 inches 1080p monitor and 27 inches 1080p monitor has the same fps when I benchmark a game
@@endmymiseryyy7908 your right dude. Screen size has nothing to do with it. Its resolution.
Its all good with the M1 until you try using plugins like neat video or motion VFX and then you find they don't work and probably never will and then you think... balls...
Neat Video is working now for M1 in Final Cut Pro. I'm using it on my M1 Macbook Air 8GB RAM system. Not sure about motion VFX, but I think they're working on it now.
Open the plug-in in and it's sub part in Motion.
Delete the separator.
It will start to work.
Also you can make the old incompatible Plugins to work with a terminal command which open final cut pro in Rosetta mode.
32GB of RAM on your I9 vs 8GB RAM on the M1 - well that's a substantial difference
A few things to consider that there is a laptop called lenovo legion 7 which has a rtx 3080 which performs 10x than this and has backlit keyboard
Prosesor
Intel vs M1 vs Amd RAYZEN
Amd rayzen R9 5900- 1540 , 16000 vs m1 -1715 ,7382 😅
The i9 is better but it’s not optimised for the cooling of apps. Also the loading times is only due to the ssds used
Finally... A non bs test! That I can actually see how fast or slow it is. Graphics... Never show me nothing:/ and reviewers claims are bs without proof. Thank you :)
Glad you liked it!
Great video👍🏼
keep it up.
I am wondering if there will be/was a 'special update' so the M1 sells better
Good video....I would like to know if it’s possible to change an iPhone 6s botton to another botton that’s working wid fingerprint ofc.
Fingerprint will not work because its each home button is programmed to the motherboard.
who else is watching this on their m1 macbook pro?😂
The speed thing isn't the impressive thing. The impressive thing is power usage. That i9 has a little more rendering power than the M1, but the M1 is faster largely in part due to the DDR5 6400 integrated. I'm sitting here typing on my M2 MacBook Pro.
wow this is.... impressive as hell.
i want one so bad. sadly macbooks are disposable toys. the battery glue is laughable. and the ssd isn't replicable.
plus the ports...
Mortal Chip Kombat: M1 Chip near flawless victory.
The sound is terrible. Hope you've corrected that now.
you are comparing an 8th Gen i9 to latest M1....thats like 4-5 years gap bru...
The m1 took that intel chip for a spin 🤣
Lol no. Cinebench score for this 3 years old CPU is 7000 on avarage. Apple just doesnt care about cooling. Anyone who bought this i9 laptop for top dollar got the performance of i3.
M1 is great. Got it last week. ❤️
@SHAKTI PRASAD SAHOO about 10 hours when browsing internet and video editing is 9-8 hours
Or more. Every program is different
@SHAKTI PRASAD SAHOO its amazing i used my laptop for like straight two days , streaming, working on some songs and its still alive and kicking.
Thank You for dis Information 👌🏻
GHz? Cores? Screen size, also how old is your i9? I remember every new iteration kicking hard during the first year or so, hard drive/ssd capacity and % used?
I’m running an 2021 iMac 5k, 11 core, 3.6 with turbo boost, 128 gb ram, internal 2 tb ssd, and it didn’t cost me 5 gs
I also have an mi laptop with similar specs but a bit more meat
I use both for audio production and find with protools, studio one, Ableton my 5k is superior (as a desk top) in every task in the home studio
Still running trash cans at work everything is smooth so opening time is one thing but sustained (8-12+ hours daily) tracking audio, vsts, plug-ins, mixing and mastering are another with a $989 difference my 5k is my best machine but the laptop offer good speed and portability.
Time will tell if silicone holds up the way intel has for us
If M1 won in most test, why M1 lost in render test?
dedicated gpu imo
@@suoree RAM also maybe 8GB his model :/
The i9 mbp has a dedicated gpu while all m1 machines (thus far) have integrated graphics. The RAM would not make any difference here. I am curious however if both intel and m1 machines are running ssd’s with equal/similar free disk space, as ssds tend to run significantly slower when over 70% disk capacity hits and increasingly slower the lower disk space gets after that.
@@elbasementpodcast8196 the ram is really important in render ngl
the render can be 2x faster with 32gb rather than 8gb
You can buy the MacBook Pro M1 with up to 16 GB of ram, while you can order the MacBook Pro with Intel with a much better graphics card and 64 GB of ram. That also makes a big difference if you can afford the price of the MacBook Pro with Intel i9 processor.
There is a new(Oct 2021) M1 Pro processor which supersedes the M1 processor.
You genius, just test a speed of sd-card in last one
fun fact, my old i5 8600K from 2017 is quite a lot faster than that M1
Other than this, the performance comparison is flawed, for example, opening programs, the i9 model has significantly more programs on it, what does it mean, SSDs get slower when they are filled, so obviously opening programs will take longer.
then, Geekbench is a flawed test, especially when comparing architectures (and in this case the two CPUs are from different ISAs!!!).
Cinebench R23 runs slower than usual, the laptop may be thermal throttling
Highly doubtful that the M1 is slower than an i5 when it's comparable and often times a better overall performer over i9
All the unimportant things M1 takes the lead.
Such a massively flawed test...
How old was the OS on the i9 Mac?
Wipe them both, use a third party OS like Linux to remove the purposeful apple slowed programming on their competitors cpu.
Jump cuts never grow old. Oh wait, I just watched this video. Yes they really do.