35mm BEATS 50mm! Here's Why...
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 31 июл 2024
- ⚡︎ My LUTs, Presets & More! www.jorishermans.com/shop
⚡︎ Music I Use [30 Days FREE]: bit.ly/3hMOMhG
In this video, I explain why I prefer a 35mm lens over the 50mm lens for both photography and videography. Of course, it's not because the 50mm is a bad lens or focal length; 24mm, 35mm, 50mm, 85mm, ... they all have their purpose but for me 35mm is king!
My favourite 35mm lenses:
Sony 35 f/1.8: amzn.to/3oBMXV9
Sigma 35mm f/1.4 (Sony): amzn.to/3UJxJhl
Sigma 35mm f/1.4 (Canon): amzn.to/3UFuuay
Sigma 35mm f/1.4 (Nikon: amzn.to/3X3Kwgd
⚡︎ MERCH: www.jorishermans.com/shop
MY CREATOR ESSENTIALS
⚡︎ VFX & Plugins I use: bit.ly/JH-MotionVFX
⚡︎ Artlist Music [2 Months FREE]: bit.ly/37MAPLJ
⚡︎ MY PRESETS & LUTs: bit.ly/2m4Q2C3
⚡︎ Photo Editing: bit.ly/3fUev3W
⚡︎ Video Editing: www.blackmagicdesign.com/prod...
→ For BUSINESS inquiries: hello@jorishermans.com
⚡︎ Join me on INSTAGRAM: / hermans.joris
⚡︎ Join me on TWITTER: / jorishermansyt
⚡︎ WORK & BIO: www.jorishermans.com
MY GEAR ↓↓↓
Daily Camera: amzn.to/3oB7Y29
Most used vlog lens: amzn.to/3Bb08Dr
B-Camera: amzn.to/38ivQmk
Lens for B-Cam: amzn.to/2Te9ZUW
Gimbal: amzn.to/3eq82zq
Drone: amzn.to/30nd6xZ
Vlog Mic: amzn.to/2LgOwqA
CINEMATIC Mist Filters: amzn.to/2K3YmOU
Variable ND Filter: amzn.to/3M2GLlj
Studio Mic: amzn.to/3cSI9aK
Godox Studio Light: amzn.to/2TXDTfV
00:00 Intro
00:35 50mm VS 35mm
01:28 35mm is NOT perfect
03:10 Why not use a zoom lens?
04:02 Why do I prefer a 35mm?
05:24 Zoom with your feet?
06:04 Why no 24mm?
07:01 Conclusion
__________
LINKS USED IN THE DESCRIPTION MAY OR MAY NOT BE AFFILIATE LINKS
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. It does not cost you anything extra to use them but they help me to be able to create more videos for you. Thanks for the support!
![Best PRIME Lens for CROP Sensor? 35mm 50mm vs 85mm [Compared]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CsXXwIQc6xI/mqdefault.jpg)
![Best PRIME Lens for CROP Sensor? 35mm 50mm vs 85mm [Compared]](/img/tr.png)
What's your favorite lens? (There are NO wrong answers! 🙃)
I’m a novice shooter and do mostly video, so I really love the Sigma 16mm 1.4.
The Nifty Fifty seems to work for me in most situations so I guess it's my favourite lens FOR NOW.
My answer is Chris Nichols
Who's that? 🤔
35mm
70-200
200-600
I had a 35mm and 85mm combo which was nice at first but I got tired of changing the lenses. The 50mm is the perfect sweetpot and has been glued to my camera since I got it. More versatile and useful than people give credit for
The thing about 35mm is that it is really close to the normal area of human sight with two eyes. That’s the reason 35mm feels so comfortable, relatable and aesthetic.
50mm is like one eye closed and more focused and intimate, but still very versatile. It depends on how you see the world. None of these lenses are better than the other.
85mm is something I really like, it’s very concentrated and on the edge of everyday usability. 24 on the other hand is also a very strong if not the strongest Storytelling lens.
45mm in human field of view so 50 is much closer to how humans see. 35mm is a good bit wider very good for cinematic video allowing u to have wide enough frame to record everything.
@@slurp3194 when I tested this I covered one eye with my hand and compared it to the viewfinder of my camera when 50mm was mounted. Same with 35mm only with both eyes.
From what I can find of the Internet 43cm should be the one. But it’s probably one eyed.
If you take the blurry parts of your vision, you might even get down to a 15mm like field of view.
But honestly, who cares😅
@@christianvolkner2028 the thing is most of our human field of view is out of focus. Like we see it from the corner of our eyes thats not really part of our field of view. It gives the illusion of a larger field of view just look straight and u will see how narrow it is
@@slurp3194 So THAT is why I like 30mm on my APS-C so much, TIL! (30mm x 1.5 = 45mm)
We can see about 180 degrees around us, so our fov is much, much wider than 35mm. Focal length changes both the fov AND the perspective or visual signature of a lens. Our vision’s perspective is closer to 43mm than anything else. I find a using a zoom at 43mm or even a 40mm prime to have a really amazing look. It looks, real, honest and humble even. Compare 35mm to 40 images on something like flikr to get a sense of this!
The 50mm is kind of a boring focal length for me. The 35 and the 85 combo has always been the best for portraits and street photography from my experience. If I were to just have one lens, it’s definitely the 35mm.
I prefer 50/135. 50mm used to be "boring". Nowadays I find the range between 24 and 28 most boring as most smartphones have them as main camera.
35/135 perhaps?
Yesssir 🤝
Genau das machen viele, deshalb ist 35 85 LAAAAANGWEIIIILIG 💤💤🥱🥱🥱 !
@@thomasackermann6097I couldn’t agree more. If I’m walking around with a camera, it’s almost always with just the lens attached, and 99% it’s a 50mm. Period. But that’s just my preference!🙏🏼
I’ve bought the 50mm 1.2 GM as my first prime and i think Joris is right. I find myself needing a wider lens a lot. BUT, i only think this view holds up if you’re just going to use one lens all the way. I’m now saving up for a 24mm to go alongside the 50 and will eventually round the primes out with a 135mm. That way i can swap them out to whatever the shot needs just like i did with my two zooms. I don’t think i’d ever ditch the 50mm because the look of it is just *chef’s kiss*
24 mm is really landscape and interior lens. To shoot it in cites and on streets you need to be a master. The wide angle is the hardest to master.
I would rather go for 28 mm, it is much more suitable for street photos than 24 mm. But if you want to shoot street style, with 28 mm you really need to be close to people you are shooting, which can create a problem.
@@dimakor5914 28mm works great in some busy city, but it is a pity there are not many great modern 28mm lenses available.
Finally! I thought I was alone in thinking the 35mm is better and more versatile than the 50mm. And I agree, the 35mm is not really a wide-angle but it’s still wide enough. I was so disappointed with myself the other night when I went to a friend’s going-away and I only brought my 50mm to document the occasion. Well, it was terribly tight inside the space and getting shots was difficult. I’ve got a new 35mm on my Christmas list - but I might have to get it a little bit early. 😆
Man I have canon M6 and bought a 22mm F2 based on your suggestions with M50. I am still a beginner but that lens gave me every reason to use it whenever I want. From beautiful portraits to banger wide lens images and videos. That's how I became a fan of your suggestions.
That 22mm is glued to my M50. Love it! 💯🔥
At some point in my journey I started preferring the 35mm as well. Your video is the most comprehensive material I've seen on this topic. It makes a lot of sense too the part about indoor vs outdoor, and having a lens that works in bright light and low light. Thanks!
I fully agree. The 50 is always too narrow for me, unless I need something narrow, than it becomes too wide….
Well phrased.
I constantly run into this issue, and it is one of the main reasons why I can never commit to using only a prime lens. I always use a zoom lens, unless in a very specific use case; usually tripod type stuff.
You just answered all the questions I had. I have a 50mm which I love. But I struggle indoors.. Could not decide 35mm or 25mm.. And you just gave me the answer
Good discussion and I agree. 35mm is my alternative to a standard zoom when I want keep size down for personal shoots. For events I'll use a standard zoom along with a flash for versatility.
You explained the 35mm perfectly and really helped me with my lens choices when doing video. I used two cameras on one gimbal: one cam has a 50mm 1.8 and the other has a 35mm 1.8. The 35 gets everything but the 50 does not. And using an 35 with an 85 is a better choice but again, no need for the 85 unless you want really close and personal shots which the 85 is perfect for. So that said, you r so correct, a 35mm 1.8 is all you really need. It took me a while to figure this out and now watching you my choice will be the 35mm only. It is so nice to see others, such as your self, choose the 35mm over all the other lenses. Through trial and error, i did the same. Its 35mm for life for me. Great job and thank you for all your work...
I like your talks about photography, I always learn something new. Thanks!! ✨
Joris, I agree with you, choose the focal length that works best with your style of shooting, the environments you're shooting in, and your subject matter of choice. Like you, I do a lot of documentary, photojournalism, and street photography. I shoot Leica and Fujifilm in those instances and I've found that 40mm and 42mm respectively work best for me with those camera systems. I shoot with the Voightlander NOKTON Classic 40mm f1.4 on my Leica M240 and the Voightlander Ultron 28mm f2 on my Fujifilm X-Pro3.
Most photographers don't talk about the 40mm focal length except when discussing vintage lenses. I think that's largely due to there not being too many lens manufacturers making 40mm lenses. Voightlander is the only company I know still making new 40mm lenses. If you haven't tried that focal length you should let us know what you think about it compared to 35mm.
This was very helpful, and addressed some of my uneducated suspicions. I feel more free filming on my phone indoors, compared to something better with a larger lens. I will upgrade when it makes sense for my goals. Thank you for helping me not waste money.
This makes a lot of sense to me, my Brother!! Awesome talk, and my favorite lens at the moment is the Helios 44-3 58mm. 😎 Many Thanks, Joris
I agree with most arguments - a 35mm/1.8 is very versatile for environmental portraits, because you can go relatively close to a person, and displaying also their close close surroundings. On the other hand: Remembger Henri Cartier-Bresson who became a world famous photographer with his images from the street mostly taken with the Leica 50mm F2.0 Summicron ...
I like 35mm for video, 50mm works pretty good for very general photography. But yea you need space. If you’re just walking around or traveling, 28 or 35mm is going to get most if not everything you want.
Make sense dude! I like both 35 and 50. 16/18 for landscape/architecture/group(of people, esp in wedding), 23 for documentary/street, 35 for portrait/details, and 85 for close-up(half-body) portrait. Hard to say one beat or replace the other. It's like rifle can never replace pistol. These are classic focal lengths for different purposes. Yes, 35mm is unbeatable on versatility but it can never replace 50mm. If you can only carry 2 prime lens + 1 camera, it never go wrong with any two mentioned above.
@@georgechen1124 I’m talking if you only bring one lens. I’m not always carrying a bunch of different lenses.
I gotta agree. I've been using a 50mm equivalent for a year now since I've been doing photography on my Canon M50. I upgraded to the Sony A7IV and got a sony branded nifty fifty. 🤣I enjoy the standard look of the 50mm for many types of photography portraits included. Once I've switched to a vintage zoom lens that had 35mm as its lowest focal length. The look of the 35mm looked so different in a way I enjoyed. Its like wide but not that wide and it feels like a balance. Once I'm able to get my hands on a true 35mm prime I'll be using it way more than my 50mm
@@thurim_69 I'm sure others would feel the same way as me
You had me with the thumbnail 🤣🤣🤣
I personally love the 35mm - although I am currently in the middle of a 365 day photo challenge...and I can only use a kit lens!!
I am also using a Canon M50 (Mark II...which means absolutely noting 🤣) so one of your earlier videos on getting good shots with a kit lens has been awesome #thankyou
Great video as always, Joris - cheers man 🙏🏻🤟
Good info , I’m considering getting a prime I can use for my videos . For the Sony autofocus issue you had ; have you tried “ face registration “ in the settings ?
as a photographer with an a7r3, I can get away with just having a 35mm and just cropping in to sorta have a 50mm.
I still love 50mm though for portrait or more focused on a single subject
Bang on in all counts, like everything it depends on context. I loved my 35mm when I was shooting a lot of weddings, particularly up in the hotel room whilst the bride was getting ready. You can only get so far back inside. Now I'm mainly outside. I like an 85mm, I much prefer the compression of an 85mm, but it only works in certain conditions.
Great video, good info in a lighthearted way, love it.
Had to learn this lesson the hard and expensive way on a friend’s wedding day. Fortunately it was his third ceremony (don’t ask) and I didn’t give up my day job. Thank you for making my learning clear, Joris!
I don't think, I like distortion in a person's face - so I don't use the 35mm for portraits of ppl period. Cityscapes, landscapes, street photography it is good for that, but I still prefer the 50mm; even though, I own both. Also, to come-back and fix it in Photoshop seems to me like you're creating an extra step for yourself that you could just avoid by switching to a 50mm when your doing portraits / close-up of people. Again, it's not flattering to distort a person's face, in my opinion. I agree no lens is perfect, and no lens is a 'One Size Fits All' situations.
Got a new camera lately - fast 50 and 35 equivalent primes were the first 2 lenses in the bag. Can easily bring both with compact APS-C.
As much as I love the 50, I have to agree with you, Joris. There’s something very special about the 35mm focal length. Love your style, too. New sub here from Australia. 👍🦘
Because of your videos I'm thinking of buying the Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Lens for my Canon EOS RP. My question is the lens has a f/1.8 which will give me a nice shallow depth of field... but what about the maximum depth of field? I take pictures and videos of outdoor products (product reviews) and many times in the video I want to show the beautiful surroundings so I don't want the shallow depth, I want to take in everything behind me or the product. Why don't they list what the maximum depth of field is for that current lens? Thank you for all your videos, they've helped me out a great deal.
Your humor is on point! Love the info in this vid too!
Much appreciated 🙏🏻🔥
Great review ! Am finally experimenting with the photography side of my Sony a7iii and a7Siii and the only prime lens I have that I've never really used is Zeiss 25mm/2. I learned video recording Musicians and concerts and got away with using a versatile zoom. Am wanting to get back to my roots of recording live shows but this time with taking stills. Was debating the 24mm or the 35mm but was leaning more to the 35mm ... Joris this king vs poop video pushed me over the edge to the 35mm. Thanks ! Plus I use the gimbal a lot shooting video and the 35 is probably going to be a plus since it tip toes into wide angle which seems to work well for gimbal style shots.
For me, the holy trinity for all day walk around are the 24mm, 40mm and 85mm, in FF terms (or a zoom that covers this range). In APS-C that's 16mm, 27mm and 56mm. But for only one lens for me it's the 40mm FF equal. But what anyone will chose for their 'one lens' will be determined on how they 'see' the subject.
Which lens do you recommend to shoot videos in concerts (low light) with a Sony a7iii, is this one a good option?
I love my 50! I also love my 35. Each have their place and best-use scenario.
I do enjoy the 50mm. Sold my 35mm for the f/1.2
One of my favorite combos has always been a good 40mm and a 28mm.
Rarely see those compared or even brought up.
Hello sir,
I have sony zve10 with kit lense
I shoot youtube videos like you are making,talking head vids,and some time reels and outdoor
My room size is 12×12 feet
Which lense should i buy?plz reply?
35mm f1.8 or 50mm f1.8 or 15mm f1.8?
I can buy one lense only
Which lense should i buy
Nice point about zooming with the feet inside a room. Sometimes you just have space to walk in
When i go simple, i use my 35 and 85 primes. If i need versatility i go with my canon 28-70 f2 which is the best zoom lens i have ever used any system, and my 85 1.2
Great video! Love to see more content like this!
If you drop more comments like this, I'll make more content like this! 🤝🫡
Recently I needed to choose only one lens to walk the Camino de Santiago in Spain. Weight restriction is important when walking 15-20 miles a day over mountains, and you don't have sensor cleaning equipment. Dust or rain on the sensor is not acceptable. So it was 23 mm ( 35 equivalent ) on a APS-C Fuji all the way. One observation: When you carry only a 35 mm lens, you start to approach the scene with 35mm options popping up in your brain. It changes how you see the scene, which I found to be a revealing experience..
yessss ive been legit thinking about this lately cause I wanna get a DZO vespid prime and I don't have the budget to snag multiple focal lengths and ive been thinking buying the 35mm is the best option for all around workhorse lens and then renting a wider/tigheter lens as needed - and then normally my go to lens is the sigma 24-70 which I realized I normally bump it to 35mm anyways for most any shoot for the exact reason you said, distortion; it just adds a little too much warping if you get too close, but 35 mm seems to be a nice fall out where you can move around more and not worry
Great video. Love your style. You won another subscriber.
Tbh,a 35mm,85mm & 135 mm is the right way to go as it makes you extremely versatile.
The 50 mm difference between all these focal lengths give you a perfect spot to change the nature of the photo completely.
Difference between a 35 mm to a 50 mm is too small in terms of a drastic change,atleast that's what I feel:)
I like to keep the 50 mm gap between the focal lengths to change up the variety of my shots.
For me too,I deem the 50 mm as something useful but not extremely necessary for most situations:)
I own the 50MM lens and can’t seem to drop it for another so best thing I’d do is save up for a wider lens to use along side the 50mm
Loved your take on the 35mm prime, you are dead on..
What beginning photographers don’t realize is that near-far perspective is function of relative DISTANCE to near and far object not focal length. For example if photographing a subject who has one eye that is noticeably larger than than the other in full face view I will instead pose the face obliquely to the camera with the larger eye further way then move in and out from the face until the near-far perspective changed via distance makes the two eyes look the same size in the photo. It is a technique I learned back in 1972 apprenticing with Monte Zucker who was a Zen Master at analyzing faces like that finding the most flattering facial angle - full / oblique left or right / profile left or right.
What focal length does after finding the ideal near-far perspective via shooting distance is control the in-camera crop. Cinematographers are much more aware of this because they much crop in camera.
Because I understand the actual cause and effect my favorite portrait lens is a 24-70mm zoom. For most faces the most flattering near far perspective is from around 8-9 feet from the tip of the nose. A 24-70mm allows capturing in-camera crops from full-length to head and shoulders from that same distance so the size relationship between nose and ears and size of cranium behind the eyes stays the same in all crops. If needing a tighter crop I switch to my 70-200mm if the goal making the face look as slim and symmetrical as possible.
When the goal isn’t to make a face look as slim and symmetrical as a super model when it is actually lopsided the none of that applies. But if learning to shoot portraits of ordinary people with less than perfectly symmetrical faces what I suggest above, which I learned from my mentor many years ago is a good starting BASELINE for understanding how to use near-far perspective to flatter a face, or not depending on on the intended body language you want the subject to project in the photo.
Thanks Joris for sharing your proactive. I've moved recently to vidéo. And because I wanted to bé as light as possible with a reasonable investment, I adopted MFT format, which has a 2 crop factor.
As I'll soon Make a one month trip to Japan, I 'm on a trial and error dynamic. For each document I forced myself to use a différent prime or zoom.
AT this point, I admit that if I have to go outside and indoor, m'y 16 mm f1.4 (32 mm frame eq.) is my choice, and when I want good bokeh as well. But for street & landscape videos with daylight, I love my 8-25 mm f4.0 (16-50 mm ff eq). Reasons : différent focal length makes m'y life easier in "run and gun" conditions while traveling.
Favorite lens - the Canon EF 85mm f1.8. Most used lens - Canon EF-M 32mm f1.4. I use crop sensor cameras so the 85mm isn't an everyday lens but is allowed out on special occasions like when I'm photographing horses. The 32mm is a better allrounder and gets used for a lot of product photography.
Is this in the context of a full frame or crop sensor camera? I use APS-C and I'm looking to buy the 35mm f1.8 but I'm not sure if I should go for a 24mm instead
24mm would be the way to go to get around 35mm on APS-C
Great input! I have been using a 50 mm lens with my trusty Nikon d5300. I use it for portraits and arranged or "fixed" situations but when I want to move more freely or the room is too small, the 50 mm is more or less useless. Even if I back up against a wall I still won't get it all within the frame. I have thought about getting a 20 mm lens but I am afraid that the distortion will be too significant and also, for my budget they seem quite expensive. What you say in your video is definitely making me think about going for a 35 mm lens.
As someone who did documentary too, i agree. I could shoot an entire video with 35mm FF equivalent (except maybe for shooting wild animals which i never got any job within).
And like you said, moving forward isnt a problem, but moving backward is hell of a problem. We cant spend too much time arrange the ambients or room around us, or maybe we just cant do it.
35mm is a perfect spot for wide enough and we can get closer to get close up enough.
This video does help. I have a K10D Pentax body only that I've owned but never used because at the time I was Canon guy. Tried selling it at various garage sales and found it recently during this old camera resurgence so I was stoked. I've been mixed between getting a 35mm or a 50mm and with your explination I think for me and what I want to use it for, the 35mm is the better choice if I just want one lens. Thank you.
In the end, they're both great. It's mostly personal preference and style 🤷🏻♂️😎
Regarding getting a 35 for your K10D. A 35 with the K10D's 1.5X crop factor will give the same angle of view as a full frame 50. Actually it is 52.5mm.
I use the Nikon 40mm f2 in that range. Super light, sharp and dirt cheap. My favorite prime lens is the 85mm f1.8. My favorite all time is the 70-200mm f2.8.
Another 40mm fan. There aren't many!
I'm proud to be a member of the cult of 40!
Could you make a video where you show how to take a product video sequence or a short b roll with almost no gear? I want to do unboxings/reviews and put brolls in the start to show off the product but i have no clue how to do it:( all i have is a iphone 13 pro or a budget of 600€ to buy a camera
Take a 35mm gmaster ( my favorite) put any a7r series camera in crop mode and voila you get a 50mm perspective. Ots muych easier to do it in camera and using your feet than guessing what it will look like in post cropped
Absolutley correct !!! agree with you 100%. I use a Fuji X100T with a fixed 35 mm f 2.0 lens on it. Love it.!!! Thanks for the video.
I would like to shoot scenery, buildings, food and cafes and places in potrait mode for instagrams. Can you Suggest one lens? For Sony zv E10 camera.
The thumbnail made me laugh before I watched the video
I'm sure it's a great vid.
I did a photoshoot of a Salsa, Bachata and Kizomba Party in low light in a small indoor dance hall.
For lessons the space is OK for 20 people.
But when there is a "Social" (party) you get 2.5-3 times more people.
I had my Lumix 35mm f/1.8 lens.
It was perfect even though the physical space was small.
I could focus on 1 dance couple and still have other couples visible in the background.
I currently use the Sony 14mm 1.8 GM. Finding it really good for video so far. Slight distortion on edges if close to objects or doing vertical. But I found once you enable a7iv 4k60 crop, active stabilization etc. You can push it to around roughly 24mm-ish and still get more pixels than you'd typically need to edit with for 1080p/social media. Also have the Sony 90mm Macro 2.8 lens for portrait stuff. Looking for a good in-between prime. Tour video has me leaning for the 35mm as it seems more versatile (can push it close to the 50mm in crop mode too). That 50mm 1.2 seems dreamy for night photography though. Hard choices lol
Great video again! How would you rate m50’s 22mm prime as a 35mm equivalent? Do the same distortion rules apply in your opinion?
Yeah, same. I love the 22mm on my M50 👌🏻
I loved this natural video!
When I started to shoot in the mid-80s all I had was a Takumar 35mmf3.5 and I used it exclusively for about a decade before buying any other lenses. Still think it's the best all-round focal length for street and most things. But a nifty fifty is also a great all rounder, as is a 28mm.
I just had a look at my photos, and I would say that the 35mm would be better for me 🙂 I think it really falls on what type of photography you do, so have a look at your portfolio!
In this video you are referring in the backgroung to full sensor not an APS-C sensor ?
wyt 35 mm for street and landscape photography?
I've used 35 & 50 for mirrorless camera. I love them, but because i'm was a cosplay photographer, i wish i had 85mm lens back then..
What if im using an original black magic pocket cinema camera that has super 16 crop factor of 2.8 that makes my 35mm a 70mm?😢
35mm is the most versatile for indoors and better for video movement,
50mm is more versatile for outdoors :)
if I could use only 1 focal length, probably ~43mm would be my choice :)
What are you using to shoot this video???
Sony 35mm f/1.8 🔥
Since switching brands, my only prime is a 50mm. I do love the focal length and it works well for myself with Street, but I can understand and do mostly agree that 35mm is ideal. I recently picked up a 24-70mm, so I should spend some time with it at just 35mm. Main issue in getting a 35mm Prime right now is price. The 35mm 1.8 S (nikon z) is around $1000CAD, and I'm more interested in investing in either a good telephoto or ultra wide (since I enjoy both Landscape and Wildlife).
My previous camera (Canon SL3), my favourite lens on that turned out to be the tiny pancake lens at 24mm, which multiplied by 1.6 is 38mm. Some of my favourite photos were all taken at that length.
Just curious what lens are you using for this video?
Sony 35mm f/1.8
I'm a beginer and I have the 35mm and the 55-210mm with sony a6600 and I love the lenses and the camera.
I agree with everything you said about the 35 mm being more versatile. I bought a 35 before I bought a 50 for that very reason
35mm F1.8 is almost glued to my Sony A7IV. It's my go to lens.
yeah.. I seriously watch every video of you till the end... till after you decompressed.... lol...
Sony is so smart that even faces with sunglasses can be detected whilst my M50 couldn't even detect faces with reading glasses...
Is there any suggestion for the setting in M50 for better face detection? I already bought the 30mm Sigma prime f1.4....
Updated the firmware...
Don't shoot 4k. Other than that the face detection is what it is I'm afraid 🤷🏻♂️
Doesn't lens correction fix the distortion anyway?
Subscribed , not because I love 35mm but I find this dude very entertaining 😂
I have a 18-55 mm lens so I get the best of both worlds it has F3.5-5.6 OSS
But that's most likely an APS-C lens - so it's like a 27-82,5 mm F5.25-8.4
I acknowledge that this is a subjective personal thing, but I've had two 'nifty fifties' in the past 40+ years - I still have one - and I must have used them half a dozen times, at most, during those four decades. I've just never got the 50mm focal length, and every time I dig it out of the mothballs and try it again, I'm just completely at a loss as to why it's so beloved. 35mm is by far my favourite focal length for general use, and yes, you're right, it's just MUCH more versatile.
Which camera and lens did you used to make this video and what is the distance between you and camera
Great question and I'd like to ask it too.I even searched the comments to not duplicate it.
Sony 35mm 1.8 and around 1 meter or 3 feet from the camera.
@@JorisHermans Wow! Thanks for the reply! I already found your answer in another comment couple of minutes after I asked.
i own a 50mm and a 24mm aaand a 75mm. oh i forgot the 112.5mm but somehow for my last weeding i should almost everything with a borred 35mm and it was my first time using this focal length. the experience was great.
Hi, I want to create makeup and fashion content, and I was advised to get a 50mm for a Nikon d5200 dslr. What kind of budget friendly lens will you recommend?
Get the 50 1.8 G
You’ll thank me later.
As a strong Bressonian/geometric composition lover, I think I'll stick to my 50mm lenses. I think 35mm is great as you said, but it is not my style when it comes to making strong geometric composition.
i agree to YOUR opinion and 35mm. is my fav beside 16-55mm
1:55 I think there's a kind of odd thinking around distortion that's reinforced by the way it's talked about in this video: that distortion is somehow a "bad thing" when it comes to portraiture. For fashion, and commercial work, where the objective is to get the most flattering proportions and look possible, I can understand why distortion is something to be avoided.
However, the subtext of a 35mm kind of distortion (even up close) vs 50mm, is that you are more intimately in the space of that subject. I, myself, absolutely love and prefer a 50mm, but I often notice a slight sense of "distance", coldness and objectification of the subject - like there is an invisible wall between the viewer and the subject. THAT'S the benefit of wider angle distortion when it comes to portraiture - it subconsciously signals to the viewer a sense of closeness, intimacy and presence that is lost with longer focal lengths.
Well concluded! If I were to keep only one (prime) lens, it’s gonna be a 35mm. And an all-rounder 24-70mm.
You're right, moving closer isn't a problem, just walk closer. Tried to shoot the moon, reached it.
Nice shirt 🤘
I like both. But if I can only bring one lens only, it will probably the 35mm.
55 1.8 Zeiss one of the best lens! If not the best! 3d Zeiss pop
I love you 3D poppers xD
Hey, Joris. I know we've only interacted due to your frame rate videos and that this video has nothing to do with that, but I was thinking the other day... Why do you choose 24 over 25 especially when being in a PAL country, anyway? If you went with 25, not only would ALL shutter speeds work for you without flickering, but you also wouldn't have any encoding weirdness when uploading 23.976 to RUclips. (which I've heard re-encodes to true 24)
Not only that but in my experience, YES, even that ONE extra frame makes a tiny difference in subconscious smoothness without affecting the filmic look, in this case AT ALL as compared to 30p's noticeable (beneficial to me with no downgrades) smoothness gain. Also, 25 is technically more versatile for post-production than 24 and especially 23.976. If you ever NEED it to be 24 decimal, you can re-encode it from 24 (dropped frame from 25) and send it off. If it needs to be 25, it's already there and won't suffer any audio bugs by being played at 25 when it was intended to be 24.
Quick note, if your camera by some miracle shoots true 24, then you can ignore the encoding part of my question, but everything else still stands. Aside from that, I really like your reasoning for 35mm lenses. Sometimes, especially when traveling, simplicity is king. I mean, society made a whole acronym around simplicity; KISS, so there's probably some photographer or videographer out there who needed to hear this.
If Sony made a 28-70 f2
Would you buy this over the 35 + 85 combo
Naah, way too heavy and expensive.
@@JorisHermans I bought the 28-70 f2 for canon and am thinking about going back to the 2 prime combo (35mm + 85mm). I lens is nice and the weight isn't a problem if you have a good sling. My issue is the price I feel is too much for f2 and 70mm sucks lol
at least a unbias review, Ken Rockwell says the same as u. 35 is his fav, me 2 , that was 1st lens. nice video man, just to the point!
It's not science 🤷🏻♂️ use the tool that works best for you! 💯 I can only share my experiences. 🫡
Since 1985, my standard lens is the 35mm; recently I use also a 40mm, but never felt comfortable with the 50mm.
you are right no wrong answers. informative lens based 7.5mins.
Some people “see” the works at 35, others at 50. Personally, I’m a 35 guy but I totally get that it’s not for everyone. I don’t use my 35GM often enough.
Nothing wrong you said.
35mm is definitely more versatile than 50mm. Bcos of shorter focal length, more field of view and... Not so much distortion as 24mm.
It depends upon usage after all.
Thx 😂 Smacked like 500 🎉
This was great
🙏🏻🔥