Apartheid Explained: Global History Review
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 ноя 2024
- What was Apartheid? Explore the history of South Africa and the development of anSouth African Apartheid Explained for students, life long learners and the cray cray on the internet. Learn about Jim Crow too! • Jim Crow and America's...
Everyone's here studying for a test and I'm just here to enjoy some history. Am I getting old and boring
It feels so good to learn something new though, does it?
Same, left school three years ago
I think I just want context for the word apartheid. It gets thrown around and I want to learn why.
Dont use this info he is soooo wrong on multiple points......
Dude same.. I just love history. I watch all kinds of random stuff like this cause I enjoy it lol..
what other videos are IB people watching in preparation for the exam tomorrow?
Yess broo fuck
ruclips.net/video/05_tghbhlfM/видео.html
Hoping for Civil rights instead of apartheid
Doing mine next year, but we have mocks soon
Keely Fitzsimmons a level tmrw, funny you did your exam like a month ago :’)
+Keith Hughes this is the first of your videos I have viewed, and just reading some of the comments below I am consistently impressed with your professionalism, and the way you stick to the facts even when your character is being questioned and your evidence doubted. Thank you for being gem in the rough.
Simon Middleton Same here. I am disgusted by how people have been acting in the comments. In this day and age we should not be like this any more. This is an educational video. I came here to learn for my exams and people get so offended if things are said that they don't agree with. It's just fact.
is a Professional supposed to get his facts straight before he makes a video about something?
Anyone else's teachers make us come here for quarantine learning?
(Edit) I guess we'll suffer through this together.
yes
uh huh, really thought the school year would become more laxed after the AP Test, guess I was wrong...
I think it’s an important thing to learn about and it’s relevant to current events.
@@morningmorgan6341 It is, but at the same time, it's schoolwork.
Dont use this info he is soooo wrong on multiple points.....
Jesus Christ the background in this video is an atrocity
I agree.
There was much too little focus on the rigid opposition to South Africa by the Stalinist bloc and the newly independent nations of Africa and Asia.
Their rigid sanctions - a foreigner had to prove that he or she had never been to South Africa to get a visa and no trade was allowed whatsoever - acted as a major restraint upon the power of an extremely resource-rich nation as nothing else ever has.
Support by the working classes of Europe of Communism further meant that their ruling classes could not support the apartheid regime as most wished. Even though those nations are resource-poor and dependent on South Africa for some essential minerals, they still did not support apartheid unconditionally.
This meant that the apartheid regime was isolated politically like no other repressive regime in a resource-rich nation. It also meant that internal opposition, although entirely illegal, had enough foreign backing to draw attention and gradually increase foreign support thereof. Even conservative, culturally- and economically-allied Australia was opposing apartheid strongly by the 1980s, when such cricketers as Terry Alderman and Carl Rackemann were banned for three years for signing up to tour South Africa in 1985.
@@guodade2239 Chill out here stalin jr. he meant the visuals.
@@chipposmaximus735 Yes the fake visuals of Sharpville taken during the slaughter of Indians by Zulu's in Cato Manor.
Thank God we are here for the information not cinematics. Right😞
@@totafea8 If you want accurate information you are on the wrong site. You should start here: www.kznhass-history.net/files/seminars/Breckenridge2004.pdf
Watching this to help prepare for my IB History test tomorrow and Wednesday 😬
Chameleon117 Saph same XD
Abbie S. RIP us 😖
Yuanxiang Huang oof good luck my dude
same man
Yuanxiang Huang yes! And now math ;-;
thank god for this video, gonna save my IB history grades
good luck with ib
Yes broo
you must have failed this info is BAAAAD
Wait do y’all have to right a 2 page essay because I do
Heh, same, doing IB history
I`m an African South African... this guy is good
i was having a bad day but then i saw you made a new video and my mood went up atleast 4 points
Thank you so much for this great video. Watching this from Germany. Gonna have my exams in March and needed badly some information about South Africa and this was more than enough !!! just simple explanation with the main facts. Super talented and best content. Wish you best 👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾
just a correction, the boers speak Afrikaans, not afrikaan :)
No, the Boers spoke Dutch (well, actually a dialect of Dutch) - Afrikaans only came into being in the 1920s and Boers are now called Afrikaners.
No, we are still known as "boere" by blacks. Also, Shane is right, Afrikaans, NOT afrikaan. Also, you're wrong. It was unofficially known as Afrikaans long before 1920s. Don't post anything unless you know anything.
Lees weer wat ek geskryf het sussie, en gaan slaan dit na! Afrikaans was only recognised as a proper language rather than a Dutch slang in 1925, although widely spoken since around the mid 1800s. "Boer" is nowadays commonly used as a derogatory term (I don't mind being called that) whereas "Afrikaner" is the proper term for an Afrikaans-speaker. 'Don't post anything unless you know anything" - indeed!
Exactly
@@Reichsritter no it doesn't
No one ever wants to talk about the Portuguese :(
you mean Angola and Mozambique?
Anna Castro they steal in silence lol
Portugues are the first to arived on south african coast eastern cape fought with bantus (xhosa) 14centcury dutch came late 1652 . & thy still claim tht bantu people arived in south africa around 1800 .
But the history does not say so limpompo north east of south africa say alot the is a place now its national heritage site where there was a nation tht was living there for more than 1000 years called mapungubwe thy were more civilised people thy know how to mine & melt a gold ,creat beads with glass . even now thy bzy studing how those people manage to do tht with out morden technology the golden rhino is stil there as proof & golden bowls etc. So tht was the proof of bantu being to south africa but apartheid goverment hide every thing from public about the finding of acheologist who where dinging there for 35 years thy were told not to say nothing on public ,tht place became a army base so tht to make sure no info is going out . luckly the apartheid ended the acheologist who were working on projects the started to tell the truth about what was happening why gorvement hide tht infomation ,now we know tht bantu are indeginous people of south africa skeletons where found proves tht and other things
The thing about khoi san
Khoi & san are difrent tribe as well as nama , they are part of bantu people
Zulu,xhosa,khoi,nama,san,grikwa,ndebele,sotho,tswana,venda , all of those are difrent tribes of bantu people
Any person who say khoi where minority is liying ,khoi people where hunted & killed by settlers the drawings on caves ,mountains are the proof of tht .the drawing shows the man on ahorse caring a gun shooting at khoi people ,you'll find those drawing in many places in northen cape ,north west ,westrn cape ,those paces where used to be khoi san's land . today in those places you'll find small numbers of khoi now the majority on the lands are settlers ,some of the khoi san ran away & seek rafuge to xhosa tribe ,some went north seek refuge to tswana some went to botswana ,some namibia
Or Israel.
@@randomstuff5869 Where did the Portugese encounter and fought the Xhosas?? According to Vasco da Gama's diaries he did not encounter Bantu along the Natal coast. He fist encounter with the "Boa Gent", the Bantu, was north of the Limpopo river.
The Khoi and San are not Bantu. You should try reading original reports, instead of offering your ignorance as fact. While at it you may also read up on what Portugese explorers found at the Mapangubwe complex. It may help with your contrived presentation of history.
Fun fact De Klerk didn't do all these things out of the goodness of his heart. He knew that they couldn't go on like that because nobody in the world wanted to do business with South Africa and the economy was crashing. He thought about what he could do to make things better and released Nelson Mandela and he kept looking at little things he could do to get the world to do business with them again. So it wasn't that his heart was in the right place and suddenly decided apartheid was wrong he did it because there was something in it for him.
And look what happened now……
@@atlantissurvivor1689 would you rather have segregation??
@@olkrai In that particular occasion yes.
@@atlantissurvivor1689 odd
Idiot...! De Klerk did not hand over South Africa. There was a referendum and the white citizens voted YES for democracy.
good luck to all fellow ib exam takers :)
bruh reading your comment was surrealistic :")
@@rani.esques 😂
Kiera P you too!!!! Praying for civil rights instead lol
@@emilee2222 same!!
@@emilee2222 For Civil Rights check out "Drunk History- Key moments in the Civil Rights Movement" its entertaining af and hella informational
Afrikaans*
Every time I watch one of these I'm so happy our people have taken back this Country. I can't imagine growing up in the same era as my parents did. It's so tragic. We're much better off today
Would be nice to also see the history of the 'New' South Africa from 1994 to 2020.
Good to see a quick mention of how the British implemented the first racial laws in 1910.
A video on the history of PROPAGANDA and media control by governments and how that caues all sorts of suffering would also be valuable. It has caused the death of hundreds of millions of brain-washed peoples accross the world. South africa was fortunate not to see levels of conflict (and numbers of deaths) that other nations endured during their liberation struggles.
Remember viewers, short overviews are meant to spark deeper research. Passing exams is not understanding history, nor learning the lessons it must teach us in the now.
Why was there so much pressure by America to end Apartheid when America had effectively the same system in every thing but name?
Bobby Brown True...
Bobby Brown Because we grew up and realized it was evil!
Yup, Jim Crow was only finish a few years prior.
Because America is selfish
Great question
It’s amazing that learn the history of South Africa there’s so much we don’t know yet can you please a full detailed video
bro I just wanted to say that I appreciate this video. I have been working on a presentation and I didn't fully understand all the people involved and the factors present until your video. Keep making videos please and keep saving people time!
These laws were similar to Jim Crow here stateside down in the south but it lasted a lot longer before it was finally abolished due to Nelson Mandela's efforts and global intervention from various communities.
Thanks for making this video. I’ve been trying to educate myself on different aspects of history and breakdown videos like this really help :)
Same. I’m just here to learn about some history.
And so you will go into this world spreading propaganda told over and over till its the truth. It started as a communist propaganda ploy and it will end as real. Those of us that lived in apartheid are getting fewer and fewer our voices are being silenced as it if turning into a belief.
Here not because I’m forced to be. Just here to get a deeper understanding of South African history because South Africans struggles and African Americans struggles in America seems to have a somewhat similar history, in terms of challenges, movement, inhumane treatment and resistance. Yet this fact itself still saddens me and triggers me deeply because we are still fighting this things as of today.
Exactly
I really needed information abouth the apartheid for tomorrow and i immediately searched for your channel, to my surprise you posted this yesterday! Thank you for your videos, i really enjoy them, you are a lifesaver! im your biggest fan
I knew you were going to need it so I made it. :)
Did you have to produce a fairy tale?
The history of newly freed peoples is always a struggle.
Blacks are essentially cultural beginners at ruling in South Africa. So how about a follow up to this on how it's going and their slow progress to being a first world country someday again.
Thanks. That was very informative. I'm not alone in that mistake, I'm sure.
South Africa is being conquered by communism right now, so that should hold the blacks back at least another century. Not to mention the new world order almost ready to conquer the entire world soon.
They would have to break from the euro banks first and make their own. Whitey print endless monopoly money and calls it investing lol. Fucken cunts are trillions in debt and my country cant get a loan. Dont even know why we call it a loan more like i cant print my own fake money lol this world is so dumb.
Don Rutter thats your fault for not crushing the banksters so now we are All screwed.
Don Rutter slow down on the mushies lmao new world order, your probably like 12-19 and been experimenting with drugs and too much joe Rogan lololol
How can you not mention that Sweden from day 1 where one of the only countries in the world that publicly and financially supported the ANC
You saved my final exam. Thank you so much!!
9:38 While it certainly wasn't effective on the grander scale (Apartheid generally became tighter rather than weaker until the 1980s), there were actually some limited successes in the campaign, most notably in case of the Alexandra bus boycott of 1957. It also served to inspire continued resistance against the regime throughout its existence and also helped bring the world's attention to the cruelty of the system.
what do you know
6:34 am I the only one that noticed that the sound didn't match with his mouth?
He corrected himself post filming the video.
Did he said what I think he said?
"PW Botha died in 1989". WRONG He died in 2006. He was ousted of the presidency in 1989 and FW de Klerk became the president who later became the vice president under Mandela. If he is this wrong on easily obtained dates, you have to ask the question, what else is he wrong about?
great video! one of the most informative ones on here. this is really gonna help with my research paper, thanks!
Thank you. I have such a better understanding of the South African situation now.
I'm writing my history second paper tomorrow. GCSE
WISH ME LUCK
Tebenguni Mkhatjwa this me wishing you luck
wow thank you sir so very much😍😍😍😍😍
Very informative video, that I appreciate. I a m a Technical Director, who has worked in TV since 1989 and I have won two Emmy awards in News and Sports Productions, My advice to you...slow down that animated background by 50%... it too busy and terribly distracting
I wish you would have mentioned the part about why South Africa got rid of its nuclear weapons.
Bacause F.W. De Klerk saw the stock pile of Nuclear weapons as a potential threat in the hands of a Communist A.N.C. political party.
@@stephanerasmus8313 Oh, so "communism" was the reason?
@@The10thManRules YES. That and the Fact that the A.N.C used Terrorism as an act of warfare against apartheid and F.W De Klerk told the N.P. National. Party. of south africa he doesn't wish to see the power of an atomic bomb fall into the hands of a people who might use it in an act of terrorism. Killing milions of people in such an act.
@@stephanerasmus8313 Given the intellectually honest historical context, wasn't the ANC acting more in a counter terrorism insurgency capacity? Context and perspective, right. The difference between justifiable homicide and murder is context and perspective.
Why did the Apartheid State regime of South Africa have, reportedly 6, nuclear weapons in the first place?
Why is the biased speculation that African communists were somehow more dangerous with nuclear weapons than their white oppressors?
@@The10thManRules Go and read how communism over trough governments. I lived in apartheid and was in the army in 1987 and it is totally not what it is as portrayed to be. Apartheid and afrikaans was used as a subject to propaganda for a communist take over. It continuous today as we speak. I am not one to believe in conspiracy theories but Stefan is telling the truth. Google tainted heroes the documentary, watch it, do further investigation and then comment.
So basically Jim Crow with the metric system.
Its funny watching him say all the names wrong
It’s hard to know all the pronunciations but yeah I’m just happy he is explaining stuff and teaching us some of what happened.
Hi Hip Hughes. I recently found your videos and I have found them helpful. May you do a video on the arrival of missionaries in S.A and how it affected the country.
Watching this is so disturbing. For the life of me I cannot wrap my brain around what makes a group of people think this is ok?
Hard to listen to this. Makes my blood boil. But I guess it's good practice towards my goal of someday becoming a Zen master. Plus there's the learnin of course. Thanks Keith.
Jan Pretorius those are false stats, South African troops were eventually driven out
South African troops were never "driven out." Everyone who served in the military knows that. Did you?
ziffulmyer Apartheid did not work out that bad for blacks. It increased their life expectancy and their income greatly during those 50 years. After the worldwide boycott against South Africa and after the ANC take over all those wealth and health improvements for blacks just evaporated again. South Africa is now a hellhole of poverty, disease and crime.
carolineleiden : Freedom is hard work, no doubt. Learning to be self-sufficient after generations of being occupied and controlled is hard work. Healing after generations of brutal discrimination is slow, hard work.
NotHereForIt Ah, name calling. How very constructive.
The people that usually say that Apartheid was not so bad at least in Southern Africa are usually Whites and Ashkenazi Jews
I just watched this before watching Anthony Bourdain's "Parts Unknown". I think it watching them together really helped get a great understanding of apartheid and South Africa
Damn online assignments 😫
My Ib English class is cancer 😎🤩
Apartheid, or its core principles were in place since 1652 when the Dutch rolled into town. The system's legacy are still evident to this very day.
Ag man. Stop with your lies. Get your story straight. You’re just saying it because you are indoctrinated by the ANC. The British was the real enemy..... not the Dutch.
@@js-wy6vd - To me as a Black South African , both were back BUT THE BRITISH WERE BACK , BUT THE AFRIKAANS ARE FROM MY EXPERIENCE THE WORST AND MOST HATED OF THE WHITES.... THAT IS JUSY BECAUSE THEY ARE GENERALLY RUDE AND RACIST.
@@Zulu.Warrior You probably haven't heard of Dinuzulu and Louis Botha? But you are right, the Boere don't like anglicised Zulus who bite the hand of those who fed them.
Yoooo u saved our asses 🙆🏼♂️🙆🏼♂️ wish us luck for our communication exam🎉🎉
Below is a repost of a comment that was written to me by a South African Lady. Here is some of what she had to say regarding Apartheid and the take over of South Africa by the ANC and Nelson Mandela:
"...the Nationalist govt. realized that blacks and Whites would never live together peacefully. So they created ''separate development'' but just went a little too far with petty Apartheid, by legislating the separate benches, buses and stuff. However they built a perfect infrastructure for each race, whereby every citizen had access to all the necessities, like excellent Hospitals, clinics, schools, universities and libraries. There was a perfect transport system in the railways and buses. There was cheap and unlimited electricity, and even though we had no way of getting oil, we made our own from coal and called it Sasol. It worked perfectly well. Farmers were doing so well that they were not only feeding the nation, but exporting food to the rest of the world as well. Everybody had access to a job, especially farmworkers whose employers housed their entire families, fed them from government-subsidised rations, built them little schools and clinics on their own farms, as they were in such remote areas. Food was cheap and plentiful.
As you have so aptly described it, we were a thriving nation and could have held our own against any other country. At one stage, in the late 70s, the Rand was stronger than the American dollar.
But, aided and abetted by the Soviet states who were eyeing the entire southern Africa, including Mozambique, Angola and Zimbabwe, for all their riches and resources and wanted to take over.
Also, we were sanctioned, ostracized, vilified in the mainstream media and generally persecuted by all the Western nations, none of them who knew a thing about Africa or Africans. Nobody thought to look North, where all the other countries had been liberated from their colonial masters, and had become basket cases. Everybody sitting under trees with begging bowls, waiting for the United Nations to come and feed them. Naturally, every single government was so corrupt, and had chased away or murdered almost all the taxpaying whites, so the countries just sank into a mire of poverty and remain so.
The Communist USSR manipulated matters so that the saintly Nelson Mandela was released from prison, where he was doing his time having narrowly escaped execution for multiple murders. The Russians flew him and a whole bunch of his contemporaries called Umkonto Wesizwe (the armed wing of the African Communist Party) took them back to the USSR, and trained them how to make bombs, sabotage, electricity pylons and of course use the indestructible AK-47 to its maximum effect.
They then returned them to South Africa, and these terrorists, including Mandela, started bombing railway stations full of civilians, including their own people. They blew up, electricity pylons and God knows what else. Eventually the whole lot were caught and taken to trial. By some miracle they escaped execution by hanging, and instead were taken to Robben island. Were they couldn't do any more damage to their own people and the infrastructure
Eventually the Western countries got their own way and had Mandela released, along with his accomplices, and through the mainstream media, turned him, a terrorist and murderer, into a Saint. A lot of white South Africans had seen what happened in Rhodesia, and had already left the country, so there were very few left to vote against handing the country to the ANC. I could go on and on, but in a nutshell that's why we were forced into handing [over] our beautiful country..."
you did not mention the sacp and helen suzman and the influence of the Soviet union
Maybe just for the video length sake?
@Shiraz Adams Google Tainted heroes, watch the documentary it has interviews with top ANC members, do some research and then comment.
@@morningmorgan6341 No Propaganda will not tell you all sides of the story for a purpose.
@Shiraz Adams As far as I know they exiled to many places, It depends on who you speaking about. You can have communist ideals anywhere. Watch the documentary, there is comrades speaking themselves and then you tell me.
@Shiraz Adams Soviet ideologies is not Russian or Chinese. Its all over the world in just about every country there is. It forms a network. SACP has dealings with Cuba and Vietnam which in turn has dealings with other communist states. Soviet countries stay independent with a central ideology and a very long term planning.
All leaders and the executives of Soviet states are filthy rich while their nations live with just the basics. A capitalist use paid workers to create wealth and workers have a choice to work or not. Socialist use forced labour to enrich themselves and commit crime and corruption the way the ANC is doing it.
I freaking like you! Even though you're so funny, I understood everything. Now, my brain is much bigger. 😂💙
I thank this youtube channel i might pass my history homework
Correction! The Union of South Africa was not an amalgamation of Colonies. It included 2 independent Boer republics (ZAR - Pres Paul Kruger and Orange Free State - Pres Steyn). This independence was re-affirmed at the end of Anglo-Boer War I. However, the largest Gold Fields in the World in ZAR and Diamond mines in the Orange Free State threatened British dominance in the area. Hence, Anglo-Boer War II followed where "the British Empire ("more than 1/4 of the human race") went to war against 2 tiny agrarian Boer Republics, Orange Free State and ZAR/Transvaal, which population barely numbered that of any major British City and who did not poses a formal standing army". The 2nd Anglo-Boer war which culminated in a drawn out guerrilla war, holocaust of the Boer Women, Children & Elderly via the Scorched Earth Policy (incl Concentration Camps, blow-up houses, kill all lively stock, burn harvests, salt water holes) and the Vereniging Peace Treaty that included Self Rule. Ref: youtube doco's Anglo-Boer War: A Black Week for the British Army & Scorched Earth (Anglo-Boer War), SA History Online
I love your videos... Greatly appreciated as always!!!
Great video as always!
One small thing in this one: the correct term is Boeren (translation: farmers) "Boers" means an agricultural way of life
"Boeren" is Dutch. In English it is "Boers". In Afrikaans it is "Boere'.
That was very good , thanks ! I see you have a lots of interesting subjects for the other videos, i can't wait to watch them
Fascinating and energetically presented - thank you.
really loved this video, i have coursework to write for my igcses so thank you.
Very Interesting, I knew litteraly nothing about the subject but now you have educated me👍👍👍
Merci frro pour la vidéo
Shut up lil nigga
watching this at 2am 6 hours before my test
Excellent video, its important to understand the history pre-apartheid
Why did it sound so weird when he said asian @ 6:36 lol
Im watching this because my teacher assigned it.
Not a bad overview, but it left out a major factor, interestingly one that is often omitted in commentary by people in the so-called 'West'.
Apartheid was the legislative and ideological justification for a system of forced labor, a way to maintain an disenfranchised pool of workers and not to bear the social costs of pollution and occupational diseases. It was structured by multi-national mining and agricultural corporations for their shareholders profits. These shareholders were not South Africans by and large, but 'investors in the UK and USA.
Apartheid ended because it simply became too expensive too maintain in the face of internal resistance. Sanctions were more of a public show for domestic audiences in the UK and USA than really effective measures. Companies merely pretended to be South African, eg Coca Cola, Ford, etc.
Political freedom now exists, but the legacy of Apartheid remains, inequitable ownership of land and the economy remains relatively unchanged. The enormous debt built-up during Apartheid continued to drain our economy for more than a decade, the horrendous backlog in equalizing service delivery has been aggravated by the inevitable relocation of people from their forcibly and artificially imposed locations in the 'Homelands'.
"The enormous debt built-up during Apartheid " was amortized with in 5years. The destruction and debt built-up by the current regime will not be amortized in a lifetime.
Are you suggesting British Kaffraria was an "forcibly and artificially imposed location". I suppose, according to your version of history, Kayalitchia used to be the Zulu empire's capital befor the arrival of the Dutch?
Your "facts" are as scewed as the documentries "facts". How about the ANC government has stolen and mismanaged this country blind with deceit and lies, with an excuse of apartheid legacy. Source main stream media 2020.
@@raymondglad5593 aw the art of denialism😂😂😂😂
Fantastic explanation. We’ll presented and concise. Just enough detail. Thanks!
Thank you so much for an amazing video ..... it's gonna help me to ma final exam as a grade 11 student
Unfortunately you are totally wrong about a lot of crucial facts. The black homelands are all on the eastern side of the country. The western half of the country is desert or semi-desert. Ironically all the homelands are located in the highest rainfall areas, best soil and climate. Why did the Boers not taken that land in stead? So by the way, Apartheid was imported by the British trying to mimic Indian Caste system in South Africa.
Great launching point. Thank you, hip hughes
apartheid(heavy concentrated apartheid) is unvalid unpractical unapplicable in its nature..... Indianism rocks hindi haryanvi rocks... Self work is must always also
Thankyou for telling the truth and being honest. What's makes it even more special is that you are a white guy. There are some terrible things that have happened throughout history and this is up there with the worst. Its great to know that there are still some good people out there.
You entirely missed the part about why Vervoed actually came up with Apartheid. The world over simplifies and ignores the truth. The truth is harsh, but it's still the truth. The main reason was protection of each of our cultures and this is evident when we look at the rest of the countries in world that westernised itself. We have multiple deep cultures in our country and 11 official languages. This would not be the case if we weren't segregated.
Thank you so much for this. You saved my english grade.
Online school assignment here.
When Somalis has an issues with brits and Italians expats they had 24 hours to leave the country. 😂
Pov: Your here on your phone because it was restricted on your school computer
Just a clarification: President Botha did not actually die until 2006; he was coerced into resigning the presidency due to suffering a stroke.
South Africans are the only people who can say Nelson Mandela properly
Would love a similar style video about the Palestine-Israel conflict.
As a South African I can personally tell everybody not to believe anything in this video because most of what this guy is saying is promoting and adding a positive note to European history.
After the collapse of the Portuguese empire and Rhodesia, South Africa was heavily involved in the war in Angola and Namibia. This had a big affect on the whites too. Many left the country permanently (myself included).
I’m reading Nelson Mandela’s The long walk to Freedom and I needed some background.
I am going to graduate in one week. Apartheid is one big thing to know for the english test. Greetings from Germany
jsh Trm surely in an exam in Germany you should be concentrating on your Nazi past if you you want to be talking about truly evil
Thank you so much!! This is a great video and I learned a lot from it. Keep it up.
How is Nelson Mandela’s actions terroristic? Think about it..it’s not the Dutch and British land to begin with
Im writing my degree about the socio-political situation of South Africa. Could I get some links to the maps in the video?
Answering your last remarks - yes, you did explain it well. Great video.
Why can't we be friends and just get a long. I don't know probably too fictional. I could careless what color or nationality you are in general just your character, what I can learn from you, what you offer, and what is in your heart that matters.
Finally a well explained video about apartheid.
Thank you for the upload. If you would kindly allow me ... I'd like to add to the above and just clear some things up.
Apartheid lasted for 46 years (not 50). The British pretty much set the stage for apartheid system prior to 1948, long before Verwoerd instituted official apartheid in 1948. Jan Smuts may have been Afrikaans, but the Boers hated him for selling them out with their own republics when it was unionized back in 1910 (Jan Smuts cozied up with the Brits).
In 1975/76 television reached SA shores and together with local newspapers became the (usual) predominant propaganda tool. Most whites were unaware of the various Land Acts etc you mentioned unless one specifically worked with constitutional law thanks to Apartheid propaganda. It was probably only until the unrest, bombings and sanctions in the mid/late 80s that most whites were made aware that although terrorist bombings were unacceptable and hundreds of innocent people died, apartheid was also put into question. Whites were sold an alternative form of bullshit like all good propagandists through the years.
IMPORTANT - ALWAYS LEFT OUT OF THE HISTORY BOOKS: 1992 De Klerk, the then President of SA, held a referendum where whites voted for or against apartheid due to the pressure of sanctions, unrest and bombings by the ANC. - 70% OF WHITES VOTED AGAINST APARTHEID!
BRIEF POST APARTHEID
After Mandela, everything went pear-shaped. BBEEE policy (Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment - a form of affirmative action, but much more). This SEVERELY impacted the white population's ability to earn and continue to suffer tremendously. Over 50% of whites have immigrated I'm told since 1994 (called "the brain drain"). In fact, there are over 114 laws (as opposed to 11 during apartheid) against whites, not to mention the upcoming EXPROPRIATION OF PROPERTY WITHOUT COMPENSATION due in December 2020. That is not restricted to land only, but anything including bank accounts, savings and/or pensions.
The third largest political party are the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), and even the ANC (ruling party) themselves (Zuma etc) sing "Shoot the Boer, shoot the farmer", "burn the farms" and One Settler, one bullet" (PAC political party) and proudly broadcast on our main television broadcaster as well as social media. This constant barrage of incitement to kill whites has led to THOUSANDS of the most gruesome torturous murders of white farmers since the beginning of this new dispensation (like the crucifying of three year old girl and boiling 12 year old boy. Having racial slurs like white pigs written on blood on the walls of the murdered hacked to death by machetes). I mention this so you can get an idea of what I'm talking about. Let's not forget the burning of thousands and thousands of acres of farmers' lands. These murders are not the same as the rest of the high crime murders that occur in this country. Most murders are known to the victim or within their community and are never this vicious. Farm murders are on a whole other level.
There is VERY RARELY mention of these murders in the MSM. But various organisations like Afriform (who are recognised by the UN) keep records of it and fight on behalf of minorities). The government REFUSES to even acknowledge farm murders and in fact at the UN in 2018 Ramaphosa (president) stated "there are no farm murders happening in SA".
Just to put things in perspective. Apartheid police killed 69 blacks in Sharpville (1960) and 176 blacks in the Soweto uprising (1976) Totals 245 blacks died. There was also abuses that came out during the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in the mid 1990s of other deaths caused by police interrogation and historians put the death toll of Apartheid police against blacks at 526 (some say slightly higher, some slightly lower) during the entire 46 years of apartheid.. (This does not include "black on black" infighting during that period).
I say this now because everything has become a "racial issue in SA and I want to make the argument against falsities such as the whites or the "WHITE CITIZENS" themselves committed genocide which is ridiculous and can be verified. Compare that figure to the current SLOW GENOCIDE of THOUSANDS OF WHITE FARMERS by black citizens (ie. not some military police - but citizens) in gruesome murders and it has been conservatively estimated that over 120 000 whites have been killed by blacks since 1994.
THE LAND QUESTION
Government owns approx 80% of the land and of the land remaining (ie. 20%) is private property. Of that whites own approximately 70% bearing in mind most farm). So it is very disingenuous of them to spew out falsities by saying whites own 70% of the land. They own 70% of the 20% private property. That was a couple of years ago and the figures might be more in favour of the ever rising black middle class.
Though white settlers were in the Cape region first in 1952 (save the KhoiSan), the Nguni tribes only filtered down from Central Africa in the 1800s towards Natal and the eastern part of the country as the lands in the Cape and parts of the interior (Transvaal/OFS) required technology (windmills etc) to farm and the Nguni tribes were cattle herders mostly. The problem is the ANC/EFF continue to insinuate that Africa belongs to blacks only and thus all land that the whites may have settled in (despite the whites buying property from the Khoisan in the Cape and the Boer Republics founding their area) are not considered citizens any longer in this country, but foreigners. There is the view that the entire continent of Africa belongs to blacks (by that logic, the Arabs in the North had also better leave). Worst part is they are not planning to give it to the blacks as they're "promising", but to lease out land to them while the government owns everything - like a good communist (Leninist style - Check out the NDR - National Democratic Revolution they've been implementing, especially since Zuma presidency).
At any rate, most of the land taken by apartheid was given back! 97% of that land the blacks opted for the money instead of the land from 1995 to about 2005 (unsure exactly). Yet the EFF and ANC keep saying they want "the land back".
HATRED AND THE COMING GENOCIDE ...
EFF Leader, Malema has upped his antics from wanting to "slash the throat of whiteness" and not calling for the "slaughter of whites", at least for now" to the now constant barrage of calls to kill the whites. I could go on and on what whites have to endure daily (and in some parts of the country it's worse than others) and the media and the government are complicit. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED DURING THE LEAD UP TO THE RWANDA GENOCIDE and we are already on level 7 of Genocide Watch. Number 8 is the actual act.
BUT THE WORLD IS SILENT. GENOCIDE IS IMMINENT WITH THREATS FROM THE EFF members (They actually use the word "genocide all whites" with pictures of machetes etc on social media). The ANC documentation have stated from the beginning to treat whites like frogs being boiled - slowly at first so they don't jump out. It has worked and the "frogs" feel the heat as the water starts to boil.
There are many secessionist organisations now for all minorities (whites, coloureds, Indians) to secede from SA in the W.Cape. But sadly, it may only happen once the "water has already boiled" killing thousands more whites in a sudden mass genocide (as they now daily threaten).
While SA was the poster child for "mutli-culturalism", clearly it didn't work. But the globalists want to implement world wide communism where you own nothing and they own you!
This is a brief synopsis that I'm sure not many people will read but anyway. It is VERY IMPORTANT that you know most whites in this country do not blame all blacks for what the ANC/EFF are doing to us, Why then are these ANC/EFF supporters (and there are millions of them) hate all whites for what an Apartheid regime did. We did not glorify the killing of black people during Apartheid or have open hate groups against them like they have against the whites. I abhorred apartheid, but this open hostility, racism and hatred the likes I've never experienced is now being experienced by the whites right now!
Thank you and God bless!
I like ur information I'm interested in more is there a way I can contact you
Yes!!!! Me too. The truth !!!
@@justone5404 - you're welcome to see my channel. I've actually uploaded 4 videos on this particular subject. Best
lol you wrote this long rubbish paragraph to disagree with a well research video content and to add you families or communities propaganda to make yourself look like the victim. fist of all it was more than 50 years, secondly you did more than glorify enslaving Blacks, you made a whole culture of it. Thirdly the ANC is a tool for white people to keep power, don't think we don't know that. You act like the victim but you still own this countries economy!
u mispelled organization
*****Indianism rocks.. Hindi haryanvi rocks... Self work is must always also*****
May I ask what your credentials are and if you have a list of sources you used? This is a fantastic video and I really appreciate it.
he's a history teacher
Ex president Botha didn't die in 1989, he died in 2006 without recieving any retributive justice for the atrocities he performed and allowed during apartheid. He he was only replaced by FW de Klerk
single handedly saving my exam grades
Correction! : United Party = South African Party (SA Union) + National Party
You incorrectly confuse SA Party (SA Union) with SA Party (Cape Colony)
Furthermore, Dr Spencer Jones said “WINSTON CHURCHILL, journalist in the Boer War, CHOSE Boer War for their military units, commando and applied it to Britain's’ own newly formed special forces in 1940)”(Ref: youtube Anglo-Boer War: Black week for the British Army) Churchill invited Afrikaner Jan Smuts to his Imperial War Cabinet appointed as Field Marshal of the British Army (highest rank). Afrikaner Jan Smuts the only person to sign both peace treaties of WWI & WWII.
Are you anti-Afrikaner or just perform politically convenient research i.e. you said “the people that are very nationalistic = the Boers the Dutch ..... hence an alliance occurs between the British population and the Coloured races to form what’s called the United Party”. I think your mind will expand when you realise that Afrikaners, like other cultures, have varied ideas about solving problems. Below info about above mentioned parties - all involve Afrikaners.
SOUTH AFRICAN PARTY - UNION (“an amalgam of Afrikaner parties (incl SA Party - Cape Colony) that advocated close cooperation between Afrikaners and persons of British descent.” Afrikaner Leader of SAP (WWI) & later United Party (WWII):Jan Smuts. a Boer General, Afrikaner, SA & Commonwealth Statesmen, Military Leader and Philosopher
NATIONAL PARTY (Leader: General JBM Hertzog he promoted South Africa’s interests above Britain’s and saw English and Afrikaans South Africans developing in two parallel, but separate, cultural streams)
SOUTH AFRICAN PARTY - CAPE COLONY first elected leader Afrikaner Jacobus Wilhelmus Sauer. Party ideology included anti-Imperialism, Non-racialism, Compulsory Education, Free Trade, Local Driven Development, etc
Ref: SA History online & Dr Spencer Jones youtube doco’s on Lessons Learned from Boer War
Sorry, your video is full of major mistakes. One for example is: the United Party (1934-1948) was NOT formed by the coloureds and the Brittish people. It was actually 2 Parties that merged: Jan Smuts (Commander-General of the Union of SA) with the SAP (South-African Party) and Dr. JBM Hertzog with the National Party. They were then called the "Smelters"-party.
A group of Boers (Afrikaans and English) with Dr. DF Malan, adv. CR Swart (South Africa's first State President) and adv. JG Strydom then (after Smuts and Hertzog's parties merged) refounded the National Party. This is the National Party came into power in 1948.
South Africa was Zulu territory, after the British defeated them they still became an influential part of the ruling government. At the start of WWII Zulu's supported the British and the Boers sided with Germany making lots of trouble in SA. When a great many Brits had to leave for WWII the Boers let other tribes swarm into SA. There were a lot of inter-tribal killings and it got to the point that no one was safe. So the Boers in gaining more power over the region in the absence of British and Zulu power took over and instituted apartheid and 'Home Lands' for each tribal group to keep them from killing each other. These were heavily policed to keep down trouble. It wasn't till much later that some of these tribes started attacking whites and colored's so there was instituted an 'full apartheid'. It was because of the non-Zulu tribes that were causing all the murder and mayhem.
Moggy, you should lay off the tik. It is messing with your mind.
The original idea from the Afrikaner was to have areas appart from each other and we can grow and develop our own areas....until the british skewed that idea into what is known as apartheid today
References available if you need to read up on history Mr Hip
I love how this guy says “apartheid”
Question about South Africa that can be set mostly in Uganda national examination board
Great video!! Very informative!
i agree
is no one else distracted by the squares moving in the back ground
The amount of words mispronounced.
South African here, it's pronounced "apart hey d" but spelt apartheid