The United States v. Lopez, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Supreme Court Cases]
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 май 2024
- GET FOLLOW-ALONG NOTEGUIDES for this video: bit.ly/3XMSawp
AP HEIMLER REVIEW GUIDE (formerly known as the Ultimate Review Packet):
+AP Gov Heimler Review Guide: bit.ly/3rfXr2Y
Additional HEIMLER REVIEW GUIDES (formerly known as Ultimate Review Packet):
+AP US History: bit.ly/44p4pRL
+AP World History: bit.ly/46rfHH1
+AP European History: bit.ly/3PCPyiw
+AP Essay CRAM Course (DBQ, LEQ, SAQ Help): bit.ly/3XuwaWN
HEIMLER’S HISTORY MERCH! / @heimlershistory
Tiktok: @steveheimler
Instagram: @heimlers_history
Heimler's History DISCORD Server: / discord
In this video Heimler walks you through another AP Gov required Supreme Court case: The United States v. Lopez (1995). This case is an illustration of the court ruling in favor of state power (remember: it's under the heading of federalism). Be careful: although the facts of this case have everything to do with guns, this is NOT a second amendment case. Rather, it's a case arguing about Congress's power to pass gun laws on the authority of the commerce clause of the Constitution.
Ultimately, this case is a counter balance to McCulloch v. Maryland which was a case in which the Court ruled in favor of federal power.
![Constitutional Interpretations of FEDERALISM [AP Gov Review Unit 1 Topic 8]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QMqLCpxPw34/mqdefault.jpg)
![Constitutional Interpretations of FEDERALISM [AP Gov Review Unit 1 Topic 8]](/img/tr.png)
![Marbury v. Madison, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Cases]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GBvUFlqlsyk/mqdefault.jpg)
to those who have their test in 14 hours and cramming the night before... We're cooked 😭😭😭
i got it in less than 14 hours
Sameee bro, just believe we got this. and don’t worry
easy 5
@@didiqqz 0.5
im cooked
POV: you are studying for the ap gov exam tomorrow
Lol
Haha yeah… I’m so screwed LOL
Lmao
🙋🏼♀️
Lol
US v Lopez is about federalism and the balance of federal and state power
Lopez brought a gun to school, got arrested by the state, and then arrested by the federal government under the “gun free school zone act.” The federal gov was questioned if they had the authority to pass this act in the first place, in which they justified the act via the commerce clause, but it didn’t hold through. With a 5 to 4 majority Lopez won; Gun regulation on school property is a power reserved for the States
thank you :)
Lopez wasn't bearing a gun to find dear after school. Lopez was an indivual who had YEARS of abuse and deep torment. Lopez wasn't one of the good ol boys looking to hunt deer etc. 🖕
W
love you
im in love with you
Who has there test tomorrow?
me, Im cooked
@@deanroach8962 me, and I am beyond cooked :(
me and i am so cooked. its almost 10 pm, im tired, and im just cramming these videos before and ik im gonna wake up not remembering anything
I have mine in just a few hours gl yall
pov: you're watching this to not fail the unit 1 test
Hope you crush it!
did u fail
@@OrNah. no i got like an 86 lol thanks for asking
@@anneth2711 good luck on the test tomorrow
@@luke-jf1ic thank you, you too!!
Lopz brought a gun to school. Got arrested because you can't carry a gun onto school. Turns out there was a federal law so state dropped charges ans gave him federal charges. However the judges sided with the kid and said that the congress was overstepping their power.
FYI, for all you AP gov students with legal career aspirations, you will be rewatching these videos again when you take Constitutional Law in your first year of law school. So, don't forget what you learn after you take the test!
Super concise and helpful, thank you!
I hope I don’t flop the ap exam.. this is the best channel I could watch for quick info
Great video!
Very insightful video. Thank you.
These are the best. Thank you so much.
Heck yes 🙌🏻
Super quick question if I created time stamps for the video would you put them in description so the video would have chapters?
the video is 4 minutes long tf
@@zachpaulus990 xD
Cramming for AP exam
Same
Same
currently working on my ap summer assignment…here‘s to a very long year im assuming haha
Heimler I am a little confused. We learned aready that the federal government can make and inforce laws with the necessary and proper clause. Why then did the federal government claim that enforcing a law banning guns from school would have more to do with commerce than with it being proper and necessary. Wouldnt it have been eaier for the government to justifiy their desicion to make and inforce the law of no-guns by arguing that the law was necessary, rather than for the government to have argued that the law fell under the commerce clause? Do I even have the right understanding of the necessary and proper clause? Could you or someone wiser than me please explain
I think the necessary and proper clause is that the federal government can make and enforce laws that are necessary for it to execute and enforce its authority. That is to say, the government would have needed to argue that a law banning guns from school was necessary for the federal government's execution of power. Hope this helps
Necessary and proper to do what precisely? Exactly.
necessary and proper clause is for delegated powers
Hi there! I believe necessary and proper just means congress can create laws that are absolutely necessary for Congress to function and they are proper to ensure this execution. Because guns on school property weren't affecting the jobs and execution of Congress, it could not be considered as falling under the umbrella of necessary and proper. (This is all my understanding of it as a fellow AP Gov student so forgive me if I misspoke)
does anyone know what happened to lopez after the case?
Mr Ardoin is the goat for showing us this
thank you
Were there any specific limits put on the use of the commerce clause or did they just strike down this specific use of it?
POV: ur studying for Mr. Cole's Federalism test tomorrow
why dox urself??
@@TULLIS-sl9tj what does that mean?
@@tobijames4698 reveal personal info
@@TULLIS-sl9tj oh snap ur right
POV; you’re in love with the people who summarizes every video on the day of exam
POV: you’re watching this for Mrs. Gillian’s history class
Tell Mrs. Gillian I said hey 👋
Wickard vs filburn needs to be overturned
3 days left.. does anyone have any tips?
0 days left, pray.
@@boomgamersam4848 I think I did ok. I accidentally did wrote about a slightly wrong topic on the essay, but I might have done ok on some other frq. I am sure that I did pretty well on the multiple choice they were easy. Trust me I prayed.
@@boomgamersam4848 how did you do?
@@harryboi494 I feel like either I got a 2 or a 3, but it was free for freshamn this year so luckily I did not have to pay 40
Wait it costs money normally?
you should start on your ap world videos soon hahaha
They are already made my dude
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
NY VS BRUEN WILL WIN ANY GUN CASE
POV: You're here because of the final exam for Mr. Near
who?