@AlexMorenson, Like I mentioned in the video the full range is considered zero - one would be 25% restriction, - 2 would be 50% restriction and -3 would be 75% restriction. - 4 would indicate no movement pass the midhorizontal line. These are approximations the Kestenbaum test is measurable and more objective
@@ophthalmologypearls Thanks for responding! I guess my confusion is what is considered "full range" for superior and inferior gaze? For example is full range for superior gaze when the edge of the iris is crossing the mid horizontal line? Or is it full when the distance the iris moves is equivalent to the distance from the horizontal mid line to the top of eye lid aperture?
@@AlexMorenson I did not find this information even after an extensive literature search. I cannot put information that is not authentic out there. If you however, do come across this information anywhere please do let me know
@ophthalmologypearls how to you grade the superior and inferior gaze?
@ophthalmologypearls how do you grade superior and inferior gaze?
@AlexMorenson, Like I mentioned in the video the full range is considered zero - one would be 25% restriction, - 2 would be 50% restriction and -3 would be 75% restriction. - 4 would indicate no movement pass the midhorizontal line. These are approximations the Kestenbaum test is measurable and more objective
@AlexMorenson, there is no indication of any landmarks that we can use that is mentioned in the literature
@@ophthalmologypearls Thanks for responding! I guess my confusion is what is considered "full range" for superior and inferior gaze? For example is full range for superior gaze when the edge of the iris is crossing the mid horizontal line? Or is it full when the distance the iris moves is equivalent to the distance from the horizontal mid line to the top of eye lid aperture?
@@AlexMorenson I did not find this information even after an extensive literature search. I cannot put information that is not authentic out there. If you however, do come across this information anywhere please do let me know
thank you maam
Last slide has mistake of inferior oblique overaction shown incorrectly.
How do you mean?
Mam, I think last image I.e right lower image of last slide should be "superior oblique overaction" rather than inferior oblique overaction.
Yes you are right. Thanks for pointing it out
Welcome mam. I m a big fan of your work to teach us. Thanks