SINI already has this feature, this is simply reinventing the wheel. Also corona sun and sky is fully custom now and honestly there is not a huge use case for this in my opinion
It's a great goal that you can easily make the sky look real. What is missing is that the exposure value should somehow be included with the selected background. This would be enough when you select the background and the exposure is automatically adjusted correctly.
Thanks for the comment, however there is no 1 "correct" exposure, it all depends on your subject. For example if the building is in shadow, you would have to increase exposure (sky would be brighter), if the Sun is shining on the building, you would have to lower the exposure.
the last 20 percent of quality - as always - means 80% the effort. One decent HDRI is often priced around 10-20€. If you get 20 in a row, 120€ - 20% discount is at least half as expensive then any other HDRI supplier out there, while those actually are scans and correct + you get the tool. where are they overpriced then?
@@n3rd_kram910 a decent HDRI is free ... 90% of the plugin is stuff you don't really need so yeah ... for what they give you and what we can use is absurdly overprized
Looks awesome for beginners that don´t know how to create good lighting, and for lazy seniors that want good results with less effort, as me. lol. Good job, guys. I will try soon.
A few weeks ago, RUclips added a translation tool, which would be very interesting if you added it to your videos since they are extremely interesting and there are many people like me who are not so clear in English because we speak Spanish. Greetings and excellent channel. I don't know if Google translated correctly what I wanted to express. I apologize.
the tool doesn't work well with V-Ray, it doesn't support the blur options. my old fasion find and bind still works great honeslty the high resoltion maybe overkill the scene and it's so heavy to upload to cloud renderings. and the big thing for me,,, it doesn't work well with pulze too...(stated in the FAQ) shoulda dive more into the details before purchase...🤕 kinda misleading and feels like ads don't get me wrong the things they're doing looks great and i appreicate the effort, but i just feel like it's not ready.
would love to test those out but its to expensive. i mean 120$ for one set, come on. Maybe we could achive a similar result with all the free stuff like the procedural sky system that comes with corona and vray and also the HDRI libary from chaos cosmos, HDRI Haven, PG Skies and so on ...
119€ for one set ? Is it a joke ? It's too much when you can have some 8K HDRI skies for free. Ok it's not the same technique, but who will be able to see the difference among our customers on what looks more like a clever disguised form of selling a new product.?
It's a awoseme tool but, honestly, paying for something that you can easily do with an hdr just watching tutorials you've uploaded before, it is not worth the money
I'm not asking how much you got for advertising because it's none of my business, but really advertising an add-on for 3ds max where each HDRi is 120 euros. Really?
Guys Stop Saying "Photorealistic" Please! that word inside programs does not existe, everything its a simulation that goes better and better but not photorealistic at all!
@ginger3d Photorealistic means literally as realistic as a photo...which by itself is not reality, but a simulation of reality. Therefore CGI software is just another tool like a camera...and yes, one can call the results photorealistic, if the artist has the right skills
@@Kreative3DMedia What I want to say is the following, I am 41 years old and I started making renders when I was 18 with Max 2.5 and Brazil Render, then FinalRender, then Vray... since then the word "Photorealistic" has always been used as a sales pitch. Year after year they have corrected corona sun, materials, etc., always saying that the values are now more realistic than before... my point is, I am tired of that speech, people make good renders with what we already have at our disposal, the AI makes a thousand times better, I don't think we need a new PHOTOREALISTIC sun.
Nice promotion. But it's misleading. Photorealism can't be achieved instantly. It requires a lot of hard work. And from your video, amatuers will think that they just need to buy this tool to attain photo-realism. So this video is misleading, in my opinion.
Dont know why you @Johnsmith-xv5gy are blocking my messages but I am excited to see your renders how REEEAAAAAL they looks with this product! Iam sure they will look again as a renders. How interesting that your answer is marked as "Featured" I can't answer and you already have a like. There is a cat trapped here!!! Seee uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
Thanks for the effort put into the video, this feels like an ad though
It is an ad although its not stated.
This is so expensive I am sure they will lower the price or it will be leaked. 120 dolars for an HDRi is absurd.
yup
Apt
yes
Its 120 dollars for a set of 20 sequential HDRi's that 6 Dollar each HDR's, plus the script. I think thats a really fair price.
SINI already has this feature, this is simply reinventing the wheel. Also corona sun and sky is fully custom now and honestly there is not a huge use case for this in my opinion
It's a great goal that you can easily make the sky look real. What is missing is that the exposure value should somehow be included with the selected background. This would be enough when you select the background and the exposure is automatically adjusted correctly.
Thanks for the comment, however there is no 1 "correct" exposure, it all depends on your subject. For example if the building is in shadow, you would have to increase exposure (sky would be brighter), if the Sun is shining on the building, you would have to lower the exposure.
SUPER MEGA OVERPRICED
the last 20 percent of quality - as always - means 80% the effort. One decent HDRI is often priced around 10-20€. If you get 20 in a row, 120€ - 20% discount is at least half as expensive then any other HDRI supplier out there, while those actually are scans and correct + you get the tool. where are they overpriced then?
@@n3rd_kram910 a decent HDRI is free ... 90% of the plugin is stuff you don't really need so yeah ... for what they give you and what we can use is absurdly overprized
@@n3rd_kram910 one decent HDRI is free you HDRI snob
Looks awesome for beginners that don´t know how to create good lighting, and for lazy seniors that want good results with less effort, as me. lol. Good job, guys. I will try soon.
A few weeks ago, RUclips added a translation tool, which would be very interesting if you added it to your videos since they are extremely interesting and there are many people like me who are not so clear in English because we speak Spanish. Greetings and excellent channel. I don't know if Google translated correctly what I wanted to express. I apologize.
the tool doesn't work well with V-Ray, it doesn't support the blur options.
my old fasion find and bind still works great
honeslty the high resoltion maybe overkill the scene and it's so heavy to upload to cloud renderings.
and the big thing for me,,, it doesn't work well with pulze too...(stated in the FAQ)
shoulda dive more into the details before purchase...🤕
kinda misleading and feels like ads
don't get me wrong the things they're doing looks great and i appreicate the effort, but i just feel like it's not ready.
I think it might do in 3ds max 2024, when she switched to vray in the video the blur option wasn't blanked out - might be worth testing
would love to test those out but its to expensive. i mean 120$ for one set, come on.
Maybe we could achive a similar result with all the free stuff like the procedural sky system that comes with corona and vray and also the HDRI libary from chaos cosmos, HDRI Haven, PG Skies and so on ...
absolute excellent
So can I ask, do you buy the main software and then have to buy all the skies seperatly at a 120 euros a collection.
It doesn't work with Pulze scene or render manager, be warned.
Why is that? You can record the sun transformations per setup. Isn't that enough for making it work?
@erikclemens1689 no you can't, I use both and neither work with vermeer and there is no solution in sight yet.
119€ for one set ? Is it a joke ? It's too much when you can have some 8K HDRI skies for free. Ok it's not the same technique, but who will be able to see the difference among our customers on what looks more like a clever disguised form of selling a new product.?
Hi There!
Ava, you are amazing!
thank you very very much
3ds Max Daylight system with corona sun, same stuff but cheaper, and you can choose countries, years, months, days, dont waste money on this
Especially with the rendering engine's inbuilt sky tools. Would be interesting to compare the results
true
Yes agree! also this product looks like just some HDR with a "NEW" sun linked, thats is. i Think people with corona sun and free HDR are enough.
10x for the video!!
It's a awoseme tool but, honestly, paying for something that you can easily do with an hdr just watching tutorials you've uploaded before, it is not worth the money
Just seems like this channel is marketing other peoples software for a cut. Not worth the money at all. It solves a problem that doesn't exist.
Hii ava great information for me just one more request can you also upload tutorial for unreal …
I'm not asking how much you got for advertising because it's none of my business, but really advertising an add-on for 3ds max where each HDRi is 120 euros. Really?
Go Lumion🎉🥲
😅😅😅
Guys Stop Saying "Photorealistic" Please! that word inside programs does not existe, everything its a simulation that goes better and better but not photorealistic at all!
You need your eyes tested. Photorealism in software is here. If you have the money.
yeah yeah! tellme that in 3 years@@johnsmith-xv5gy
Really? Please buy this product! I am excited to see your images how REEEAL they looks!@@johnsmith-xv5gy
@ginger3d Photorealistic means literally as realistic as a photo...which by itself is not reality, but a simulation of reality. Therefore CGI software is just another tool like a camera...and yes, one can call the results photorealistic, if the artist has the right skills
@@Kreative3DMedia What I want to say is the following, I am 41 years old and I started making renders when I was 18 with Max 2.5 and Brazil Render, then FinalRender, then Vray... since then the word "Photorealistic" has always been used as a sales pitch.
Year after year they have corrected corona sun, materials, etc., always saying that the values are now more realistic than before... my point is, I am tired of that speech, people make good renders with what we already have at our disposal, the AI makes a thousand times better, I don't think we need a new PHOTOREALISTIC sun.
Nice promotion. But it's misleading. Photorealism can't be achieved instantly. It requires a lot of hard work. And from your video, amatuers will think that they just need to buy this tool to attain photo-realism. So this video is misleading, in my opinion.
Well, with this tool it is instant, of course you have to work on other things like materials for exaple, but that's out of topic.
im a fan of your videos, but you could seriously deal with your mispronunciation (eg. available, environment, usually)
Dont know why you @Johnsmith-xv5gy are blocking my messages but I am excited to see your renders how REEEAAAAAL they looks with this product!
Iam sure they will look again as a renders. How interesting that your answer is marked as "Featured" I can't answer and you already have a like. There is a cat trapped here!!! Seee uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
Дороговато за эту шляпу. 120 евро за облачка пздц. Дали бы демоверсию чтобы по тестировать.