Mysterious things do not necessarily have only one and the same background.You can change the TV channel with both near and far control.By demonstrating the near mechanism, the remote mechanism is not excluded!
This case against ESP is about as sound as most proof of esp. If you want to dispel it in the same course you consider the validity of research, I'd suggest using more solid reasoning. Just as blind person can trick you into thinking they can see, this does not mean that no one can see!
Gestalt in german means a figure , literally a Figure something whole with no features ,just an Object in the shape of something , we would say something like ....Ich habe eine gestalt gesehen ....I have seen an entity
First of all, it’s not repeatable in a laboratory is bullshit. The CIA definitely studied it. I believe I’m saying his name right Ingo Swann definitely run out viewed many different places by simply receiving coordinates in an envelope that he didn’t even open and this is all declassified. Second of all I myself have had many premonitions, and I can tell the difference between them and a dream that happens subconsciously it’s like telling somebody to hiccup on command this guys so smart he’s stupid.
![[PSYC200] 15. Consciousness Part 1: Variations and Rhythms](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wRAc3QQlWdQ/mqdefault.jpg)
![[PSYC200] 15. Consciousness Part 1: Variations and Rhythms](/img/tr.png)
![[PSYC200] 7. Neuroscience Part 1: Introduction to Neuroscience](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/aJetOjsC7jg/mqdefault.jpg)
![[PSYC200] 12. Introduction to Basic Sensations](/img/1.gif)
This professor is awesome... Respect from India🇮🇳🇮🇳
Very true
This is the best class + bestest professor i ever seen ...huge respect for u sir truly amazing 😌🌷❤❤❤👑
Best lecture ive seen in awhile
Mysterious things do not necessarily have only one and the same background.You can change the TV channel with both near and far control.By demonstrating the near mechanism, the remote mechanism is not excluded!
Nice use of mentalism in the beginning.
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
wow he didn't tell us how he did his magic trick wow
This case against ESP is about as sound as most proof of esp. If you want to dispel it in the same course you consider the validity of research, I'd suggest using more solid reasoning. Just as blind person can trick you into thinking they can see, this does not mean that no one can see!
Gestalt in german means a figure , literally a Figure something whole with no features ,just an Object in the shape of something , we would say something like ....Ich habe eine gestalt gesehen ....I have seen an entity
This guy is full of ××××
@24:17 “I’ll tell what just happened at the end of the day
@109:10 I’m not telling you until you graduate
Really??? You lied to us 😒
I think she was watching the live feed lol
Lots of car symbolism
First of all, it’s not repeatable in a laboratory is bullshit. The CIA definitely studied it. I believe I’m saying his name right Ingo Swann definitely run out viewed many different places by simply receiving coordinates in an envelope that he didn’t even open and this is all declassified. Second of all I myself have had many premonitions, and I can tell the difference between them and a dream that happens subconsciously it’s like telling somebody to hiccup on command this guys so smart he’s stupid.