BLADE RUNNER!!! (like AMONG US, but better...)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 сен 2024
- OPEN ME FOR THE THINGS!!
This video was edited by Cameron Marek: / cameronmarek
MY PATREON (for full length reactions + polls): / nataliegold
MY SECOND CHANNEL: / @nattiegold
MY INSTA: @nattiegold
MY TWITTER: @natstaygolden
GEAR I USE:
(As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases from using the links below.)
Canon EOS 70D: amzn.to/3rgT81G
Canon EF-S Lens: amzn.to/3cZMMih
Blue Yeti Nano: amzn.to/325O9GH
SteelSeries Arctis 3 Headphones: amzn.to/3joKpqx
Tripod: amzn.to/3n3eizA
LED Lighting Kit: amzn.to/3owGnzP
LED Color Changing Light Bulb: amzn.to/2XDwNze
Original Movie: Blade Runner: The Final Cut
*Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. NO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT INTENDED. All rights belong to their respective owners.
Let’s not forget the amazing soundtrack provided by Vangelis…
Amen.
Conan the Barbarian, Star Wars, Repo Man, Lost Boys, Young Guns, Breakfast Club, Heavy Metal. . .
it most cases a major part of a movie.
@@vapormissileand their most well known - Chariots of Fire
A masterpiece of a score.
@@danielsmith5088 boom
Amazing movie. Pure art.
Roy Batty died in 2019. As did his portrayer Rutger Hauer. RIP
🤯
Easily one of my favorite actors.
The ending monologue he delivers always gets me
@@ThePyroSquirrel1 i think it was improvised, wasn't it?
Roy Batty is my answer any time someone asks "which bad guy was actually right?"
It's crazy to think this movie is nearly 40 years old. It's so richly detailed, so layered, that it's one of those films you can watch ten times and see new things in it every time.
It has texture, the whole movie is alive.
I remember watching this film for the first time in 2003 and being amazed, because it looked better than most films out in cinemas at the time despite being made 20 years prior.
this film created cyberpunk. that's why it's so timeless to us - countless films have copied its design and visual feel, so that it's vision has always stayed with us.
He left Deckard alive to show his humanity and help Deckard realize that at that moment, he was more human than Deckard... and left him alive so someone could remember him... and... remain 'alive' forever. He needed comfort before dying, and the only way he knew he could achieve that was through his own humanity. Deckard's face changing, realizing he was the bad guy the whole time, is priceless.
I don't see it as him thinking he's more human than Dekard, though, I agree with the rest of your conclusions. I think that as the end came, he saw Dekard fighting to live just as hard as he was and the preciousness of life finally mattered to him. In the end he cherished life, ANY life, enough to save Dekard, and leave a witness to his own life and death. The only immortality possible.
« More human than human »
Deckard was the turtle on his back in that moment, and the replicant decided to help it.
Interestingly the version with Dekard narration, he explained why he think Roy let him live.
@@thomasnguyen7850 i don’t remembre what he says! It’s been sooooo long since i saw it! 😕
You are probably the only person who ever laughed during Roy's "time to die" monologue.
Yeah, that wasn't the reaction I was expecting (or wanting).
I thought the same. For me, it’s one of the best pieces of cinema ever created.
@@stormbard And, from what I understand, the speech was improvised by Hauer.
@@ariochiv damm thats so cool
@@lendondain1 it happens with old movies, catching a reference that suddenly recontextualizes events from one's own life is going to pull people out of the movie watching, can't really avoid it.
The fact that Gaff then leaves behind a silver origami unicorn is meant to the indicate that he knows Deckard's dreams… indicating that those dreams were perhaps implanted, just like Rachael's memories… which would mean that Deckard may actually be a replicant.
I think Gaff was the "original" bladerunner, and was very good at it, but he got injured and/or too old, so they use his memories as implants for replicant bladerunners like Deckard.
@@Mars-l9bThat would actually make a lot of sense!
@@Mars-l9b It would also explain why Gaff doesn't like Deckard: he's a skin job walking around with Gaff's memories in his head
Of course, I've also heard the theory that Deckard is a Replicant with Holden's memories (the guy Leon shot in the beginning), and his literal first day of existence starts with him in the rain, waiting to get noodles, all the while believing that everything in his life was real and actually his own, except... not really.
@@necrosunderground Wouldn't he know he was Holden when he suggested Holden to check on the skin jobs?
@@TrusteftReacts was Rachael aware that her memories were Tyrell's niece's?
Although, in fairness, the Deckard is Holden theory breaks down when you find out there's a deleted scene where Deckard visits Holden in the hospital after Bryant dragged Deckard back in
You can basically take any random frame of this movie and put it on your wall as a work of Art.
That's true for both the original and the sequel.
I don't believe you have a Nook🤔
That's the benefit of having a Royal College of Art graduate as a director with Ridley Scott.
Major props also to the cinematographer/DOP Jordan Cronenweth and the creative consultant Syd Mead.
22:50
Miniatures.
Same as the sequel, simply breathtaking...
"I'm expecting an action movie with Harrison Ford..." I think that has a lot to do with why this film did so badly at the box office. Most people made the same assumption, and then were confused and ultimately disappointed when they got something entirely different.
The original theatrical release emphasized the action somewhat more and the philosophy a lot less, which is why Ridley Scott didn't like it.
I enjoyed it in 1983 just after the return of the jedi
Coming out the same time ET did didn't exactly help.
Fair, but also, it's hard to picture this film doing well in 1983, especially given the shallow theatrical cut. It's an arthouse movie the studio attempted to cut the art out of. It'd be like trying to make Alien a Blumhouse jump-scare crapfest instead of a moody, atmospheric, Lovecraftian horror.
In any case, I'm not sure audiences who flocked to Star Wars were going to readily adopt sci-fi that made them sit and think (Star Wars is fun, but it ain't real think-y. In fact, if you start to think on it, it falls apart quickly. The Empire never heard of hull-down design? You'd think it'd become obvious when their first towering AT-AT was sniped with a rocket from 10 klicks out).
@@danhelphrey6260 "The original theatrical release emphasized the action somewhat more and the philosophy a lot less, which is why Ridley Scott didn't like it." What a load of bull! The original cut and the Final Cut have exactly the same amount of action and philosophy. The only significant changes are the voiceover, the unicorn dream, and the ending. A real fan would know this.
Natalie: you can tell everyone had fun making this.
Reality: everyone was ready to kill Ridley Scott during this movie.
By the way,you have the mind for these kind of movies . Asking all the right questions and appreciating the cinematography. This movie is a work of art.
Not to mention Harrison Ford and Sean Young hated each other.
@@Rwededyet Sean was terrified of Harrison. She was actually hurt in that romance scene when he slammed her against the wall.
Daryl Hannah actually broke her arm when she ran into the van and broke the window as she slipped on the slick ground. She needed stitches and a cast to deal with the injury.
I think it has been said over the years this was a miserable movie for the actors. RS made them depressed on purpose to get a certain kind of atmosphere in their deliveries.
Natalie is so adept and quick. ILH
“Why is he dreaming of a unicorn?” Funny that she should ask that. There’s a bit of debate about that... 😂
And how did Origami guy know about the unicorn? Who's a replicant and who isn't?
The dream was implanted.. The Unicorn outside his door was to inform him of what he was.. There is RUclips information on this subject if you hunt for it
Her earlier comment about "we know that Harrison Ford isn't a replicant, he's the most human acting one." 😂
@@richiow68 There is dispute about that. Ridley Scott says Yes, that was always his intent. Harrison Ford says No, they never discussed that for Deckard's background.
Denis Villeneuve went ambiguous in Blade Runner 2049.
I used to think it was probably because Gaff was zapping subliminal messages in Deckard's mind, to send the message that he was on Deckard's side and had access to secret technology. Then 2049 came along, and it's got mind reading technology!
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die."
Roy Batty
Such a great ad lib from Rutger Hauer there.
The greatest add lib of all time!!! R.I.P
And Natalie fucked up the moment. Still love her though 😜
@@Joshkie2 The original dialogue was similar but not as elegant and Rutger Hauer told Ridley Scott he would re-write it. He re-wrote the speech overnight and they shot the next day. Definitely Rutger Hauer's work, but not really an ad-lib.
@@Kestrel1971
Yes I know. I just did not feel like ruining a good story with details.
😜
Ridley Scott on Blade Runner's Tears in Rain Monologue (2017)
ruclips.net/video/uPUIDHQv8rM/видео.html
It's always great to watch a movie that literally defined an entire genre of films. AS Mad Max defined the post-apocalypse and Night of the Living dead defined Zombie films, Blade Runner defined the dystopian corporate future. This is an absolute classic.
A huge influence on cyberpunk too.
I've never seen such a dumb reaction to the scene that is considered by critics to be an icon of cinema of all time,,,.when Roy die,,,,,.and this sex still wants to control the world.... we're fucked
Trivia #2: When Daryl Hannah hits the truck window and shatters it, that wasn't supposed to happen as it was regular glass. She kept going and that was the take they used but she had to be hospitalized for lacerations all up her arm but that was the take that they ended up using :)
That’s funny, something similar happened with Ben Stiller filming “Mystery Men” where his character throws himself against a windshield which is not supposed to break, as a joke about how ineffective his character is. But on the first take Ben Stiller actually cracked the windshield. IRL and it ruined the take. Lol
But also, that's the take they used in the end...
It's and increasingly common occurrence for movies at least today to use the take on which the stunt person seriously hurt themselves (assuming their is one, and it was non-fatal) as a sort of sign of respect. Hot Rod famously has one as well; stunt guy hurt himself real bad overshooting the target and getting an even more brutal result than intended, and they went with that take instead of doing it again to get the intended result. Effectively saying "you were hospitalized getting us that take, we're not going to reshoot it just because it was a little off script".
@@TehFrenchy29
A couple of notorious times, they used the take where the actor really died.
@@happyslapsgiving5421 Namely?
"I'm looking forward to watching a fun, action-packed movie."
BR is one of my favorite movies of all time, but what a choice of words.
Yeah, I was like “uh... you’re in for a surprise” lol
The plot sounds like a pulse-pounding edge-of-your-seat thriller, but it's so not-that... it's more like *dream* that you're in a pulse-pounding edge-of-your-seat thriller, that is not so much thrilling as it is weirdly unsettling...
The voice over from the theatrical release goes like this: "Gaff had been there, and let her live. Four years, he figured. He was wrong. Tyrell had told me Rachael was special. No termination date. I didn't know how long we had together... Who does?" --- I never realized how powerful this movie really was. From Roy showing mercy and humanity in his last moments, to Gaff throwing down his gun and quitting without retiring Rachel...
I was never bothered by that commentary. On the contrary, I like the 1982 version most, including the car scene at the end. I saw many videos reviewing the final cut and almost all of them had the same reaction at the end: "What ? That's It ? That's the end ?"
Theatrical Cut supremacy! :) Sad to see the reactors only seeing the Final Cut all the time because there's some kind of consensus among the fans that the narration is "immersion-breaking" when it's literally a staple of the crime noir genre :(@@jirinejedly540
I've seen this movie once a year since 1982. Never noticed the unicorn in Sebastian's apartment.
It was added (as was the unicorn dream) in the later releases (the non-voiceover/non-happy-ending releases after the theatrical release)
They hired a futurist named Syd Mead to design the sets and everything. He is a legend.
He was involved in other movies like Star Trek The Motion Picture, Tron, Aliens and Time Cop.
@@AlpineWoods Dont forget the sets were also Frank lloyd Wright buildings
Because Mead was not a member of any of the movie guild trades, he was listed as a Futurist in the credits (his term)! I own his 2 book/laserdisc Kronolog boxed set: it shows not only was he an incredible thinker, but had the technical skills to make it work! I also had the chance to hear him speak at the Concept Design Academy in Pasadena CA years ago: the room was full of professionals from every kind of Studio, company and college! Brilliant mind!!!
@@AlpineWoods I believe the creators for Mass Effect listed him as their primary inspriation... and honestly the Citadel in particular looks like something he would come up with.
@@jamesbyrne9312 The Bradbury Building used for JF Sebastien's apartment complex is not a Frank Lloyd Wright design.
‘I love the lighting in this movie’
Natalie, meet Film Noir.
Film Noir, meet Natalie.
With all due respect to film noir, this was way beyond that. Not least for the unfair advantage of being able to use colour, and brilliantly.
Natalie meets cyberpunk.
@@TheStOne1 Not technically cyberpunk, either. That came right at the end of PKD's life as the PC revolution took computing power out of the sole hands of large corps and gave it to individuals. William Gibson was the first to blaze that trail.
Technically it's "neo noir". The original film noir was really a movement, not a genre, that started with The Maltese Falcon (1941) and ended with Touch of Evil (1958). Anything after that is not authentic, because it is imitating the film noir movement rather than being part of it.
I would call it Tech Noir.
Fun fact, Edward James Olomos, the actor who plays Gaff, the other Bladerunner who keeps leaving the origami figures, was in the rebooted Battlestar Galactica as Commander Adama, where he would also deal with near undetectable androids, that were also referred to as Skinjobs
...and he was in charge of Crockett and Tubbs, and he rarely knew what the fuck those two were gonna do.
Battlestar Galactica was great! But last season kinda meh.. Feels like most of the scifi shows the last season is the most disappointing.
@@rampake-1575 It's a matter of taste for sure. Haven't seen the original, but the remake for me was way too much of a soap opera. It didn't really benefit much from being a science fiction setting. Couldn't even finish it, too much drama for my liking. Same reason I stopped watching game of thrones at ep4.
@@raifthemad The original...was pretty much sci-fi schlock. It was on Sunday nights.
Not knowing how to successfully end a show is kinda par for the genre. What stank to me about the reboot Galactica is they used one of the most trite cliched endings from golden-age pulp SF.
In defense it's hard to really land the bird, because a lot of the time you don't get notice that you haven't been renewed in time to do anything like an ending.
I think the only series I've seen do it right is Babylon 5...and that was a Herculean effort, and it still left plot threads dangling.
But I'm starting to think "right" is a number closer to infinity than zero given that everyone's idea of right is going to be at least slightly different and sometimes more so.
It's amazing to think that this movie is almost 40 years old but still sets the bar for futuristic settings. You can see hints of it in movies like The Matrix, Minority Report, Fury Road, and even the Hunger Games but its use of light and the imaginative future setting is so perfect that I'm not sure it can ever be topped, only imitated.
And all over the Cyberpunk and Shadowrun RPG's (thematically)
Another key movie of the cyberpunk genre is the original "Ghost in the Shell" - which also has some amazing music.
People can argue all they want about if Deckard is or is not a replicant, the point of the movie is to be ambiguous, it's about what it means to be human, blur the line of creator and creation.
Rachael and Roy were replicants but they could feel emotion and fell in love.
The blade runners and police were humans who could no longer feel emotion.
Deckard was meant to be somewhere in between.
The answer in my opinion is that he is both and neither. He's a unicorn.
Natalie "Im sorry, I'm only human!" Isnt that something a replicant would say?
Oh..mmy..god. Tyler, you are marrying replicant.
@@DiedrichKnickerbocker1783 Tyler... Tyrell.... almost an anagram...... Makes you wonder! ;-)
All she has to do to find out if she is human is to put her hand in boiling water. If the hand is fine afterwards, she is probably a replicant. .. Or maybe the mother of dragons.😄
Natalie is sus.
Replicant or not, if there was a factory somewhere churning out women like Natalie, the world would be a much more interesting place. LOL
As a Ridley Scott fan, you should watch the director's cut of Kingdom of Heaven.
Absolutely!
I have attempted to watch that movie 5 times but I always fall asleep after what seems about 12 hrs.
Is that Ridley Scott's worst movie?
@@CerberusDawg Agreed, the Director's Cut of Kingdom of Heaven is amazing! The soundtrack alone is worth it!
I've heard people reccomend it but i saw it long ago and didn't like it. But i also don't remember it and don't remember if i saw the directors cut or not. Might have to revisit that one some time. like i can't remember the movie much at all.
Natalie: I'm only human.
Interesting choice of words Natalie. I need you to take a test now.
2049 is definitely a must watch too, stunningly beautiful and such a heartbreaking story
if you watch the sequel, there are three short movies that explain what happened between the first and the second movie, which really helps to understand the context of the second movie. otherwise you only get three sentences at the beginning of the second movie with that key information.
BTW. those shorts are on the official warner bros youtube channel
Didn't know that, but tbf I think the movie did a good enough job to explain it since I didn't need those short movies to understand the movie.
Yes it was a huge surprise. It was an amazing sequel
@@matthewtheobald1231 It was a bit weird how you had to dig to find the additional really cool content that came with 2049.
As a long time Blade Runner fan, I started following everything about what they were doing...and my excitement only increased with Villeneuve heading the sequel project.
couldn't disagree more. I found 2049 to be an extremely dull and empty film. I felt nothing for anyone. It was beautiful, yes, but that was all it was for me.
This film was a mood. It had a feel and sense to it unlike anything else. And while it wasn't a darling at the Box Office, it is a critical success and major influence in works to come. It became one of the touch points for establishing a cyberpunk noir atmosphere.
It’s impossible to measure how influential this movie is. It’s like watching a dream
Every Nat reaction video:
'I'm so confused!'
'What is happening right now?!'
'You guys, this is SO SAD!'
'What? WHAT? WHAAAAAAAT???'
'Yeah!'
'No!'
'I have so many questions!'
'If (x) dies, I am DONE with this movie!'
'Oh my God, I did not see that coming.'
'PHEW!'
Ok...?
She needs those views
@@metalliholic she's getting 'em! xD
Someone should make a drinking game out of this
Idiots gonna be idiots
Gaff was at Deckards apartment to kill Rachel but decided not to, Gaff left the unicorn as a sign that he was letting them go.
And of course to let Deckard know that he is a replicant, and the unicorn dream was implanted.
@@thestarglider except that Deckard wasn't a replicant.
@@thestarglider Nah. He wasn't dreaming, he was awake playing with the piano. It wasn't in the original release either. And if he was a replicant, why wasn't he dead after all those years of service, in stead of retiring? Or why is it so special he fall in love with a replicant? No moral drama.
@@Hiraghm He canonically was though. The debate was over as soon as the Final Cut came out. In fact, it's necessary to know that Deckard is a replicant before you see 2049, because it assumes that you already know.
@@MrRizeAG Actually, the question is still left vague in 2049, if you consider that Deckard is not a replicant, the movie still works, they purposefully left it vague
JF Sebastian's apartment building is the Bradbury building in LA. It's also in 500 days of Summer.
Yeah, go get some food at Grand Central Market and then the Bradbury Bldg is across the street.
Roy's speech at the end is one of the greatest monologues in cinema history and the ending of it was improvised by the late Rutger Hauer.
His speech is basically telling Deckard that though he is a Replicant, he has memories of his own like any real human would. He has seen things you people wouldn't believe. He's telling Deckard that just because he is a Replicant, it doesn't take away from his humanity. Replicants just want to live. In fact, Roy and the other Replicants are probably more human than human.
"Improvised" is not quite accurate. He came up with the last line and Ridley Scott let him use it. He didn't just come up with the whole speech while the cameras were rolling.
This was based on a short story titled Do Androids dream of Electric Sheep by Philip K. Dick. So many of his stories have been made in films!!
A novel, actually, although most movies based on his work are from short stories.
Natalie should react to the movies based on philip k dick's novels especially minority report and a scanner darkly...
@@richardctaylor79 Yes, so many stories of his have been made into movies and even short series.
Total Recall is another exploration of memory and how it defines people. (Replicants are people!)
@@bleukat They made two movie version of Total Recall too, the Arnie one, and the more recent version.
The Origami Man (played by legend Edward James Almos) seems to know what Deckart dreams. Almost like how Deckart knew Rachael's childhood memory....
The characters name is Gaff.
The same way Gaff is calling Deckard a "chicken" for quitting the job the first time, he ends up telling him "your dreams are Tyrell's niece's"
dropping the bread crumbs there , do you ? =D
Tyrell presumably told Deckard about his niece's memories after Deckard was able, with difficulty, to suss-out Rachel's status. There's no reason he wouldn't, and lots of reasons he would; he does like talking about his advancements.
The question about Gaff (Olmos) definitely stands, though.
Roy's little monologue at the end was partially an ad lib by Rutger Hauer, he added the "tears in rain" line.
Actually he cut a large seemingly out of place monolgue and turned into a simple speech that resonates perfectly with the films themes.
"I believe, without a doubt, that he is a human." Well that was just perfect.
She usually guesses the plot points
@@jonunya1163 well she didn't in this case. That's a big part of this movie. Is he a human?
Well the thing is, the way the movie is shot, Deckard absolutely is human. It was only after the movie came out, and people started speculating, that Ridley Scott changed his mind on it. But if you think about it, the movie doesn't really work if Deckard was a replicant.
@@Imaculata Why not? Who else would you employ to kill dangerous replicants, than another replicant?
@@Imaculata I think you are making a number of assumptions there. About both the intent of the creator, and what does or does not "work". I do not know, for sure, one way or the other. I do not agree that it does not work if he is a replicant, and I know for sure that you do not know what Scott really intended.
Even if your assertions are true, it fails to acknowledge that art is often a fluid process, that is fully capable of morphing through meanings over time, and rarely ever have only one "proper" intended function.
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
Rip Rutger Hauer!
I have the 4k and the blu-ray set with all the cuts! Classic.
Truthfully, I want "All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain." to be on my tombstone.
Characters in this film are represented by animals, J. F. Sebastian spiritual animal is the rat, Priss's is a Racoon, Zhora's is a snake, and you guessed it Rachel's is a unicorn. Deckard's is a dog which is not really explained in this movie. Roy's is a dove. The beauty of the picture was that most of the movie Roy was presented as a monster, but in reality he was bringing piece by destroying the maker of the replicants who would, in effect, enslave people and give them only 4 years to live. The dove in the final scene is Roy's soul. When he dies the dove is released.
“When it’s a human howling at you, that’s terrifying.” Your bloodydamn right, boyo.
*you're
“I’m only human.” - Natalie, Replicant 2021
Famous building in downtown Los Angeles called the Bradbury Building was used in the finale of this movie. It is an architectural landmark and was built in 1893. It is the quintessential film noir backdrop having been also used in classic noir films.
Another location was Frank Lloyd Wright's Ennis-Brown house (also in LA, as the whole movie was supposed to be in LA). If you're also a fan of WestWorld, similar architecture was used for Bernard's home - which I'm sure was a Blade Runner reference, given the similar themes in that series.
@8:34, there is a theory that Deckard is actually a replicant himself. Also he is running around with some of Gaff’s
memories.
Hence every time Gaff makes a little origami it’s to mirror some of Deckard’s feelings - scared, excited or dreaming of unicorns.
I think most people agree that Deckard is a replicant, Ridley Scott himself has said that he is. The final scene in Blade Runner: The Final Cut, the origami unicorn, is supposed to be a confirmation that Deckard is a replicant and that "his" memories/dreams are actually Gaff's.
(SPOILERS)
*
*
*
The sequel lays out exactly how and why he could be a replicant... but then still leaves it ambiguous whether or not he actually is one - because, just like in this movie, in the end, it doesn't matter.
@@zephid11 Note that Holden, the interviewer Leon shoots at the beginning, looks a good deal like Deckard, and has similar mannerisms and voice. I suggest that it is not Gaff's memories that Deckard has, but Holden's. I think Gaff's origami animals are just him fücking with Deckard.
Either that or Deckard and Holden are both replicants, which implies that perhaps _all_ Blade Runners are replicants.
But I always liked the movie better when it was completely ambiguous if Deckard was a replicant or not. The worst thing Scott ever did was confirming that Deckard was a replicant. It's a more interesting movie if we have to work it out for ourselves.
@@tarmaque I mean for me one of the biggest give aways that Deckard is probably a replicant is the reflective eye thing. It only happens in replicants
@@tarmaque All Bladerunners are replicants would be tight the twist
Fun fact: the "I've seen things... ...lost like tears in the rain" monologue was something that the actor of Roy (Rutger Hauer) came up on his own. And now it's one of the best / deepest quotes from any film in history of cinema.
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe... attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched c-beams glitter in the dark near Tenhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost... in time... like... tears... in the rain. Time to die."
Actually, he didn’t. He edited & added to what the writers composed. Ridley liked what Rutger did, and the rest is history and legend.
Roy knew he was dying fast so he shoved a nail through his hand to get a massive adrenaline rush from the pain to keep going. Roy caught Deckard because right before he lost his grip, Deckard spat at Roy, demonstrating his strength of character. He was defiant even when he was about to die. Roy decided that made him worthy of saving.
Everyone says 'before he lost his grip' If you look carefully Decker falls and Roy catches his wrist in mid-air. He wants the BR to fully embrace the despair of dying, and saves him anyway. Roy is not just strong, he is genius. He probably knows all BRs are replicants and kept in the dark about their own nature. Notice how Decker is 'in retirement' when this job is assigned to him. This suggests there is a prequel story that broke him emotionally. Perhaps the prequel is a false memory for him as well as the unicorn. Decker may have been created one day before we first see him eating.
@@TheGunderian Everyone says it except you right?
@@tigqc ok binder.
@@TheGunderian Interesting ideas. The question, though, is that if Decker's a Replicant, why isn't he stronger? It might be that the Nexus-6s have deliberately had their capabilities toned-down to human levels in order to not spoil the illusion (eg we never see Rachel do anything superhuman, I don't think), but that does sorta raise the question of why one would bother using them in the first place.
In any case, it's not surprising that Roy overpowers Deckard, as Roy's a combat model, but even Pris, the "pleasure" model, had no problem beating-up on Deckard. That's kinda weird, too; why would a pleasure model be given enhanced strength? If there's one place you don't want a machine that's capable of tearing-off limbs, it's handling your sensitive areas.
@@michaelccozens Yeah I feel like the Deckard being a Replicant theory falls pretty flat on its face because he's just way too weak and flawed. If you're going to employ hunter units to hunt down and kill replicants gone rogue, why on earth would you make them much weaker and slower just like a human? Just so that it itself doesn't know what it is? OK and what the heck does that achieve for its mission and purpose besides fooling an audience who's watching a movie about it?
If you're going to create an artificially intelligent biological "weapon" to effectively take out other malfunctioning biological weapons before they can do too much damage, the ONLY sensible decision would be to make it much faster and stronger and smarter than the ones it's hunting down, or at the very least equal to them, not the other way around! People want Deckard to be a replicant because they think it gives the movie a cool hidden plot twist but seen from within the world the movie plays out in, that would have been an incredibly stupid decision with no benefits whatsoever.
"All those ... moments ... lost ..." in a flood of words and giggly laughter... Girl, you just broke a lot of hearts. ^^ Bless you.
Yes, 2049 is a must watch. Way better sequel than expected.
It might be one of the best sequel movies of all time
and absolutely stunning visually
Best sequel ever made imo
Must watch in 4K as well just wow
@@aarontwenty7 thankfully I do have it in 4K 😂😂 amazing film
Blade Runner in the theater was an amazing experience. There's tons of detail in every shot that doesn't appear on a small screen. The Sound Design is every bit as good as the art Direction. If an Anniversary Revival comes to town, do not hesitate to go.
I always like your reactions, and this even better than most. Well done !
The movie has a very rich metaphor - It's not a single viewing sort of movie. It's like an onion, it has many layers that reveal themselves with subsequent viewings. You have chosen well... This is one of the greatest science fiction films of all time, and a seminal work in the cyberpunk genre.
It's like an onion... It stinks
@@joshualewinski3450 No, what stinks is your taste in movies. :P
About replicants: They’re referred to as robots, but they’re made of organic material. They’re humans, but they’re bio engineered, made in labs and factories, and are enhanced in some ways, so they’re not seen that way. They basically found a loophole for human slavery. Unnaturaly made humans.
The origami is in reference to what’s going on. The first time Deckard is refusing to hunt down the replicants, and Gaff makes a chicken, implying fear. The second is a man with an erection, Deckard’s eventual romance with Rachel. And the unicorn...
Deckard had a dream about a unicorn, at the end he discovers Gaff was in his place and left an origami unicorn. How would Gaff know about his dream? This implies Deckard is a replicant and the unicorn is an implanted memory. There’s one other small thing supporting the idea. The glow of the replicant’s eyes. In a shot or two, you can see Deckards eyes glowing in a similar fashion.
This has been theorized about for years, branching into other theories. Like maybe all Blade Runners are replicants, or Deckard has some of Gaff’s memories and that’s how he knows about the unicorn and why he seems to dislike Deckard so much.
Something to keep in mind if you watch 2049. Only the Nexus 6 models had the short life span
Yep. If a corporation can make a buck rights be damned
Yeah, they're not Terminators.
I argued with highschool teacher about this. He insisted they were only robots, with wires and chips under the flesh. I told him if that was true would an X-Ray reveal them?
Replicants are living organics, but engineered and grown in parts, then assembled, like clone body parts Frankenstein'd together
Every time people mistake Coraline for a Tim Burton I shed a tear for Henry Sellicks xD
Fair. Although if Sellicks was worried about it, not aping Burton quite as closely would be an easy solution. Not that Coraline isn't great, but the stylistic influences are pretty explicit.
One thing I love about the Tyrell/Roy Batty scene is how much it plays out like a Greek Tragedy. The golden lighting, the father/son conflict, and the music make that scene one of the best in the film for me
I loved how you burst out laughing at one of the most iconic science fiction scenes of all time
And it's completely blasphemy. That speech was supposed to be depressing and pessimistic
Epic not-man confronting his own mortality: words
Natalie: HA HA HA SOMEONE I KNOW SAYS THIS A LOT
@@xavvi this is why I don't like talkative reactors. Ugh.
@@SaRENRampaiger I think that's called just watching a movie...
I didnt love it at all.. it actually made me never want to watch this lady ever again
Next Ridley Scott film: Legend starring Tom Cruise, Mia Sara, Tim Curry, and Billy Barty.
I wholeheartedly agree with this. Legend is another visual masterpiece and the film itself probably provokes more debate as to whether it is actually `good' (I personally think it brilliant)...
A childhood favorite. I bought the DVD a couple years back and it had the Jerry Goldsmith score, not the Tangerine Dream one. I can’t even watch it 🙉. No disrespect to Jerry Goldsmith though.
I guess it’s like anime. When you watch the dub first, it’s hard to go sub and vice versa.
@@ratspike8017 a great fantasy film ruined by poor editing. even the director's cut is kinda garbage.
Natalie, one of the places they filmed, especially when you asked “where they filmed this,” was the Bradbury Building in Downtown Los Angeles. You can visit the ground floor of it and it’s beautiful. The building shows up in a lot of films but it’s most famous for Blade Runner.
"Guys I saw Roy vent" omg I lost it.
@@CerberusDawg maybe you're not that familiar with the game Among Us! In the game, the bad guys can go through vents and that's a way of knowing for certain if someone is bad. She initially compared the plot of the movie to Among Us, so that was just a little joke about it because Roy came out of a ventilation shaft or something similar.
Yeah, it's a pop culture reference. You could've had total recall of the Oxford English Dictionary and it would have sailed right over.
“If I had a nickel for every time my robot son gouged out one of my eyes, I’d have two nickels” was an absolutely hilarious use of censorship.
EDIT: Okay “I’ve got to hand it to him, he’s nailing this” is twice as good.
I'm glad you found it hard to distinguish, cause I think that was kinda the point. The humans are mostly emotionless while the replicants are the ones showing emotion.
Kinda makes you think that the replicants are more human than humans.
@@neil2444 That was the Tyrell corporation slogan, so, yeah, kind of the point.
@@neil2444 😂😂
@@Lucklaran I'm glad my reference to the Tyrell slogan wasn't lost on you.
YOU NEED to do the sequel. I think you'll really like it based on his reaction.
In 4K if possible as well , the visuals and sound design is jaw dropping
Yes! Dare I say, I think it’s better
In IMAX was better.. incredible experience
Blade Runner 2049 is definitely a better movie than this one
Both have that slow paced feel that i like… and many movie fanatics don`t. It is a matter of taste, but i like both. And both are slow in their Ways.
I saw this film when I was in college. My friend loved it so much, he bought the original poster from the theater we saw it in and had it framed in a black suede matte and black frame. It was around six feet tall when finished. It was gorgeous.
"Why are they called 'Blade Runners?"
Literally because the producers just wanted a cool title. The book it's based on is called "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep" There's another book called "The Blade Runner" about a guy who delivers razor blades. The producers bought the rights to that book as well just so they could use the title for this movie.
"Why the dove?"
The same reason for the nail through the hand: Tyrell "plays God" by creating man, living in a spacious fortress in the clouds above the claustrophobia of the teeming masses below - Roy is his "son" and therefore he is a Christ figure, who saves Deckard's life and maybe his soul.
The designer was Syd Mead, who did the first Star Trek movie and "Aliens". Ridley Scott told Mead to make future Los Angeles look like a Eurpoean comic called "The Long Tomorrow" by writer Dan O'Bannon and the artist Moebius, who both worked for Scott on "Alien." Moebius designed other 80's and 90's movies like "Willow" and "The Fifth Element" and worked with Syd Mead on "Tron"
I was scrolling through trying to find who would give Syd Mead credit for the atmosphere, cultural infusion, cars, etc. He was brilliant and poking through his work, even decades old, can give inspiration for stuff. Brilliant designer and his fingerprints are all over this film.
There are constant small hints that Blade Runner and Alien take place in the same universe. The two mega Corporations, Tyrell and Weyland, are rivals. One company made Replicants, the other made Androids.
They prefer artifical persons themselves. :)
While Seegson trails desperately behind them both
The movie Soldier with Kurt Russell officially happens in the same universe as Blade Runner.
@@sfisabbt Yeah, Sargent Todd having apparently served in several of the same battles that Roy did
I think that was decided in Prometheus. There's something on a screen that confirms this.
Deckard gets the unicorn origami from Edward James Olmos’ character, almost showing that he put the unicorn dream in his head, showing he’s really a replicant
Jordan Cronenweth was the Director of Photography on this movie. Can't believe he was not nominated let alone win the Oscar for this, he did win several other awards for the cinematography for this movie.
I'm glad Roger deakins finally got his for the sequel
In London, UK there's a event called SecretCinema and they recreated parts of the film. You have to dress up as characters from the film. It rained indoors, you can buy food and drink from the markets, you can roleplay and it was filled with actors running scenarios. After a few hours you watch the film on massive screens and the scenes are also acted out by the actors. After there's a party. It was amazing.
Photos here
www.secretcinema.org/previous-worlds/blade-runner
NO EFFING WAY!! I want to go to there and do that thing please very much! Sounds like the last big Rocky Horror bash I went to but for Blade Runner!
Also...a question I've been meaning to ask a UK bro: In the states we've taphouses where some places I've been to have 80 different beers on draught...A to Z domestic, foreign, craft. Have a pint or 2, and fill a growler for home...for me it's like beer lover paradise. Specifically where I live in the Pacific NW (met a lot of expats who love it here...must be the mist and drizzle lol) we have a lot of craft breweries with on site pubs. You lot have anything like that over there, and if not, how receptive do you think the average person would be to something like either opening up?
Currently drinking: Silver City double IPA. www.silvercity.beer
@@Posit_Zero_Blue "we have a lot of craft breweries with on site pubs." Lots over here as well. Around 2000 different breweries. We have beer festivals(different times) all over the country. The last one I was at had around 170 different beers from nearly 100 different breweries. We quite like beer in the UK.
Wait, what? SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!
@@GSXRTino1 Oh I know...that's why I didn't want to make assumptions lol. I wasn't sure if it was one of those "Effing Americans...nobody needs a grapefruit shandy!" or "Why you over do it with 97 beers, America?!" It's one of things I'd assume, but assuming stuff you don't know about is dumb lol.
In my state (Washington) we have almost close to 400ish craft breweries. I think I heard that we have one brewpub for every 17,500 residents or somewhere near about. Our lives are basically coffee, beer, weed, rain, mist, volcanoes, ocean & lots of stuff to do outside lol.
Open invite to all you UK bros and sisters! IPAs are our jam (I've had some strong doubles, boy!) as we're in the biggest region for hop production. I have to say we make a pretty good cider now and then as were in apple country too.
Also our FC is pretty damn rockin as well ;)
@@brucebieberly4166 www.secretcinema.org/previous-worlds/blade-runner
During the French Revolution (1789) the "Blade" referred to the Guillotine. In the book "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep" which the movie is based on a Blade Runner was an authority with permission to terminate a Replicant on contact.
The book is soooo different. Philip K. Dick is one of the greatest sci-fi authors of all time. What a fucking madman.
That's... also entirely true of BRs in the movie? Not sure of your point here.
Interesting idea, but I think if that were the allusion intended, it would be a lot more specific. The rest of the movie's not exactly subtle in making references.
Also not sure your purported historical reference exists. There were lots of slang names for the guillotine in the FR, but I'm not sure "blade"'s one of them. The guillotine was usually seen as a replacement for (and improvement on) the executioner's axe. In Germany, for example, the guillotine is specifically called "the falling axe". The mere presence of a blade wouldn't be remarkable; in fact, its absence would be, as beheading was, prior to the FR, an execution method typically reserved to the nobility. Commoners got hanged.
Any attempt to find a relevant meaning for the term "blade runner" is doomed to failure. The term came from a sci-fi novel by Alan Nourse (with a very different plot to the movie), and the studio paid for the use of it because it sounded cool, cooler than "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep", anyway.
Replicants started the mutiny because of oppression, Roy's crew's goal was just to get a normal life as any other oppressed would do. After realization of all hope being gone Roy just spend his last moments giving Deckard an example what it feels like living life being hunted- In the end Roy showed that he appreciates life same as other humans, he just didn't want to stay as a life long slave. As for Rachel, ignorance is a bliss, she showed that Replicant could be as lifelike as a human with no distinctions. Great movie, shame that you didn't comment the soundtrack which is beautiful.
This movie influenced so much. It helped create the cyberpunk genre. It flopped in theaters, but gained respectability over the years. It was ahead of it’s time.
One of the saddest, most iconic scenes in movie history, and you laugh and talk thru it. Wow.
Every frame of this movie is a painting. Easily one of my favourites, warts and all.
The big speculation around this movie is if Deckard himself is actually a replicant, with Ridley Scott and Harrison Ford famously differing about it. The big sign that he might be, the unicorn dream which ties in to the origami that Gaff leaves behind at the end (implying he's Deckard's handler) only appears in the director's cut.
He isn't but Gaff is , think about it.
My trouble with Scott’s interpretation is a couple things. Gaff knowing about Deckard’s dreams could mean Deckard is a replicant, but that would be a stronger case if they didn’t know each other and hadn’t worked together. Since they did, Deckard just might have mentioned his weird unicorn dreams to Gaff when they were at a cop bar or something. Second, why is Deckard so weak compared to the replicants? Makes perfect sense if he’s human but none if he is a replicant too.
@Travis Pack Pris was just a pleasure model and yet stronger than Deckard. We don’t know how strong Rachel is because she never really has to demonstrate it. But even if there exist replicants who are no stronger than a human, even though if that were true there would be no reason to make Pris so strong, why would you make the model you are using to hunt down other replicants one of those weak ones who will probably therefore fail in its task? And why even bother to have a replicant blade runner if not to have them better able to match up? Why have another replicant running around to go rogue if it isn’t any better than a person? And why was Deckard allowed to retire if he is a replicant? Wouldn’t they have killed him?
@@TheRealWalkingDude Not every Replicant was bio-designed with strength in mind. Rachel wasn't exactly punching holes in the wall was she?
If Deckard was a replicant, and I believe he was, then I believe he was part of an experiment (as Tyrell stated about Rachel). That experiment's results being fully realised in the conclusion to Blade Runner 2049.
@@nickshale6926 well, Rachel doesn’t get into any physical altercations. But Pris does and she’s just pleasure model but stronger than Deckard. But regardless, it is a legitimate interpretation that Deckard is a replicant. I don’t think so and these are just a couple of the reasons why.
(I don’t include Blade Runner 2049 in my thoughts on the original personally, since they are separate works).
The sequel Blade Runner 2049 is a masterpiece
So right ✅ it is !
Masterpiece? I think steaming piece of crap is a much better description.
@@justmeeagainndon't sugar coat it tell us how you really feel as your opinion means so much us 😆🤣
@@justmeeagainn that's so interesting. I've literally only ever heard people say it's phenomenal or complete garbage, nothing in between. I lean much closer to the masterpiece end of the scale, but I completely agree that it's a little disappointing how it complety dropped the masterful use of shadows and lighting as the original did.
Its an alright movie as a stand alone movie, but a very unnecessary and disappointing sequel to a beautiful movie. It just spoils the original blade runner. This movie didnt need a sequel.
18:38 Remember, Rachel is a Nexus 6, and is physically stronger than Deckard. If she wanted out of there, there's no way he could have stopped her.
You should also check out the Sean Connery movie, Outland. I've always believed that Alien, Outland, Blade Runner, and Aliens could all co-exist in the same universe.
The origami unicorn was for Harrison Ford's character. It was the guy letting him know that he's a replicant and he knows about his unicorn dreams because it was implanted. That was the main difference between the theatric cut and the director's cut. In the theatric cut it was implied he was human, in the director's cut, that piece of information implies he's a replicant.
The problem with that whole setup in the film is that there's multiple in-universe possible explanations. Only one of them is that Deckard is a replicant. Gaff is a co-worker so maybe he told him of the dream(s). Second, Gaff is the replicant with Deckard's memories. Lastly, there's the option that Deckard is a replicant.
According to the original screenwriter, Deckard is human. Ford believes that Deckard is human. The unicorn dream was only something that was added in the "Director's Cut" in 1992 (with footage from Legend). The original source material has Deckard be human as well.
It also undercuts the whole climax of the film. The climax has a replicant and a human facing off and the replicant acting more human than the actual human. That's all lost if Deckard is a replicant. To me, it comes across as Scott trying to be clever, but not thinking about the larger picture.
@@tjl9458 Yet that is canon. 🤷♂️
Natalie: "I'm definitely anticipating a lot of action."
Me: "Oh you sweet summer child. It has almost no action and is soooo much better for it"
Yep this movie is to make you think, years latter I still find something new to enjoy about the film.
It's not really true that this movie has "almost no action". A lot of people get violently murdered in this movie! But I guess it does lack the long boring CGI demo-reels that define modern action movies.
@@ThreadBomb Thanks for the reply! While you are certainly free to define it how you prefer, "action," in cinema, denotes kinetics on screen. For most people, I don't think they would consider the murders that Roy commits to be action sequences. (E.g., Standing still and simply squishing Tyrell's face in or unplugging the scientist's suit.) Also, action doesn't have to be those long boring soulless CGI sequences. Great action films have been around for as long as cinema has. See, e.g., any Charlie Chaplin or Harold Lloyd film even the Great Train Robbery.
So, while there are a FEW short action sequences (a fight with Pris, a chase with Roy, and the scene with the woman gets shot in the back) it seems pretty clear that Blade Runner's tiny drop of action is nothing like what Natalie was discussing. Of course, I am happy to be proven wrong! 🙂
RIP Brion Howard James (Leon) died in 1999 & RIP Rutger Hauer (Roy Batty) died in 2019 the year this movie takes place in fictionally. Joe Turkel (Eldon Tyrell) is 93 years old today in 2021 (wow) Great reaction.
I hired this film on VHS as an eleven year-old back in 1983. I was disappointed that it was not Star Wars and that Harrison was not Han Solo. But... I was also mesmerized by the visuals, the sounds, the Vangelis soundtrack. I hired the film literally dozens of times in the next few years and this film remains one of my very favourite films.
Ridley Scott has always stated that Deckard was a Replicant. And Gaff knows this and was aware that Deckard had dreams about unicorns. It's also why Deckard's eyes also shine red, like Replicants, in certain light.
Loved watching your thoughts on this Natalie! 👌
everytime i hear the words "among us" in any context, i suffer a mental breakdown
Twitches Full Movie Disney 2005 - Best Halloween Movies Online 2014 Full Movies what movie name
WHEN REPLICANT IS SUS
ITS EVERYWHERE. GET OUT OF MY HEAD
hello amogus gamers
Amogus
This is one of my favourite movies of all time, it is so incredibly (visually) beautiful, and it has one the greatest actors my country ever produced in Rutger Hauer (Roy). I'm really happy you did this one, thank you
Loved this video! I’ve seen this movie a hundred times and never even thought that Leon might have shot the agent at the start because he was angry about the mother question. That’s what I love about this movie: many different interpretations.
One version shows Deckard and Rachel driving off into happily ever after!
That's the original theatrical release... hmm, is it in any of the other's? Can't keep them all straight. This movie has too many versions, hehe.
@@GUNNER67akaKelt No. Ridley Scott hated that and it was forced on him by the studio to give the movie a happy ending, so it's not in the other cuts.
@@benlee8436 Thanks for the info.
I like happy endings, too. The real ending of every story is death. Generally speaking, death is a real bummer.
@@GUNNER67akaKelt It certainly is. We need a more original writer.
The aerial shots for the happy ending version was B roll from the Shining.
The moment Rachel finds out she is a replicant is so heart breaking.
The total mind f-ck that would be is unimaginable. Each of us are born from our mothers and fathers it’s a basic fact of human life. But then someone tells you no you are a thing that was created for a purpose 🤯🤯
This is a classic. Unicorn... is Deckard a unicorn, was it coincidence, was it trauma from hunting replicants? Was Deckard a replicant and he [Deckard ] did not know? Is that why Olmos' character teasing him in specific ways?
@@BoydofZINJ Yep I think so. He probably gets a chuckle out of working with a Deckard
Imagine everything you remember in your life is nothing but a dream created 15 minutes ago.
There is actually no way to disprove it. Other peoples memories of you would also be just as suspect.
Physical artifacts form our past can be created out of whole cloth for the purpose of maintaining our illusion of "history"
The past is a complete illusion constantly being created by our consciousness one micro second to the next.
It’s even deeper than that. You don’t even have a grasp on your “own” thoughts as they’re programmed and not even your own. You are life that is devoid of the free will to have your own consciousness. Crazy.
@@Lethgar_Smith Very good point on sense of personal continuity
The main fan theory is that Deckard himself is a replicant. That's why he acted so robotic with Rachel.
Also, how else did Gaff know about the unicorn in Decker’s dream?
Chip Gower It wasn't a dream. It was a memory of a unicorn.
Oopsie! I also misspelled Deckard’s name!
Deckard's rough treatment of Rachel during sex is quite an obvious indication that he's a replicant ... because replicants lack empathy at the first few years of their creation.
(Most viewers fail to see that, they just think the scene is awkward and accuses the director of trying to glorify rape when the director is just trying to show how replicants lack empathy in their early years)
But humans underestimated their ability to learn empathy before the 4 year life span is up .. thats why you see Deckard treating Rachel more gently later on in the movie and Roy saving Deckard, etc ...
What a treat! This is one of my all time favourite films.
This movie pretty much single-handedly set the tone and the look for what would become the cyberpunk genre. It's a piece of artistic genius.
When you get the chance to watch "The Fifth Element"... Leon is the general who tries to recruit Bruce Willis to go on a mission to save the world.
First she's gotta win those tickets to Fhloston Paradise
She has watched it. It's one of her reactions.
Oh wow, I didn’t realize. That’s cool.
@@mintyfresh3533 I need to look it up, then. I must have missed it.
A couple of years back my wonderful wife bought me tickets the The Secret Cinema's Blade Runner event. This is basically were this company puts on a live action RPG based around the movie, then shows the movie. Folk were dressed as street gangs, corporate types, etc. but because my wife kindly got me the VIP tickets I got to be LAPD. This was VERY cool. The whole environment looked straight out of the movie, from buying noodles from the street chefs through visiting Taffy Lewis' club, and I still have my LAPD badge. There were probably 300 guest LARPers and maybe 50 staff playing NPCs, etc.
Most coolly I helped bring in a replicant (one of the other players), and was one of just ten guests promoted to Blade Runner as a result. The memory still brings a huge grin to my face! And the LAPD got the best seats in the house watching the movie, too.
Timeless memories connected to one of my favourite films. It doesn't get m much better.
Harrison Ford - Decker- is interrupted while eating ramen.
Next scene Decker is 'detained.'
Nat: Oh hey, at least he gets to take his food with him!
Watch Big Trouble in Little China if you haven't already!
Ridley Scott made this movie, but he modified the meaning and scenes of the movie years later to imply that Harrison Ford was a replicant. The unicorn scenes were installed and changed years later to made Ridley Scott's meaning correct, but everyone that saw the film in the theaters and the original home DVD release knows that Ford and many of the other actors knew that the cop was not intended to be a replicant but a human that fell in love with a replicant. This is something that critics realize about the director and how his obsession with AI intelligence is altering his films (Blade Runner series and Alien franchise) when no one believes that the original intent was that plot point.
Yes, watch 2049 by Denis Villeneuve. By the way, "Arrival" is his masterpiece, check that one, too.
I think 2049 is better, but I'm not going to argue. Both fantastic films
Gods damn, words cannot express my anxiety for his take on "Dune".
I want to hope for it to be good, but these days it's more realistic to merely hope that it wont suck.
@@kentonbaird1723 all his films gave been pretty damn good. Dune has a fantastic cast and a great director. I have faith.
honestly just watch everything by Villeneuve
@@Biggiiful eh the cast is kinda meh.... they are all big names, but not all of them are actually good actors.. plus, i just cannot imagine momoa in the role of duncan
The unparalleled production design is truly the star of Blade Runner and I’m glad you appreciated it so much. It’s seminal for sooo many sci-fi visuals in later decades in very much the same way that stuff like A Boy and his Dog or Mad Max would be reference points for other artists.
I've watched this movie at least 10 times, and am grateful for its existence. It birthed Cyberpunk, Shadowrun, and The Matrix. But the most important spawn was Priss Asagiri and the Replicants of Bubblegum Crisis.
It's not because they chose Ridley Scott, it's because he made so many awesome, cult classic movies. Hope you like this one, it changed the history of sci-fi movies.
This and 2049 are some of the best movies ever made. Please do 2049 in 2 parts. It’s incredible
Blade Runner 2049 is easily one of the best movie sequels ever made... stellar movie.
...and Cyber Punk is born. This was the first movie I bought on DVD when the players first debuted. One of my favorite films, still holds up.
If you liked this (admittedly a masterpiece) and feel like jumping on a series with a somewhat similar tone and themes, I'd recommend "Battlestar Galactica".
I hope she realizes you are talking about the ‘newer’ BG, and not the terrible, corny 80’s TV series that was basically just cashing in on the popularity of Star Wars at the time.
@@Ryotsu2112 Good point, should have added a disclaimer 😂
You neglected to mention Edward James Olmos is in Blade Runner (Gaff - the origami guy) and BSG (Admiral William Adama) :)
Natalia, DON’T read this.
....
....
....
....
....
Just had a thought. One of the theories is that in Bladerunner, everyone on earth is a replicant. Humanity has left.
In BSG, earth is the cylon home world.
Hmmmmm
Fun fact: The "tears in the rain" line was improvised. They liked it so much they kept it in. You can see Harrison's reaction to it is real.
"Improvised" isn't quite the correct term. In an interview, Ridley Scott tells of how Rutger came to him with these lines that he had written himself and Ridley thought they were so good he added them in.
@@donrichards271 ah cool, thanks for the update my man. Duly noted 😁
@@matthewhoward-white463
Yup, the real story goes that Rutger rewrote the lines the night before the scene was shot because he thought the original was overwritten. But a cool detail to add is that most people didn't know about the change and apparently, I know its a meme now, everyone on set applauded.
RIP Rutger Hauer, fucking legend of a man
No it was not improvised on set.
It was improvised but at a script reading beforehand.
This is shown in the documentary Dangerous Days where screenwriter David Peoples mentions Rutger's mischievous look after reciting the improvised lines
This isn't comedy where you take a shot once or twice.
Ridley probably shot that scene half a dozen times at least before he was happy with it.
So you can bet that there was minimal improv on set.
Living in NYC from 2015-2020. Each time it snowed or rained I would walk around Time Square listening to this Soundtrack with my headphones on while the city was empty. Especially Tears in the Rain, all those memories....
This movie is based on a book by Philip K. Dick titled “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep.”
I love that title.
I've read it - it is honestly very unlike the movie and is almost farcical in parts. The movie takes a much grimmer turn.
The studio apparently didn't.
For those that don't know, they bought a separate property called "Blade Runner" just to use the name.
@@thatHARVguy Actually the original Bladerunner (by Alan E. Nourse) was also about to be adapted (William S. Burroughs wrote a filmnovella based on it with some surreal elements and sex as he just can do); as I know Ridley Scott was hired for this originally but it had a dear end and he decided to adapt Do Androids... either (similar situation when he was chosen for Dune)
I always figured they would merely count them while falling asleep.
OMG I’m soooo glad you’re diving into my favorites. 2049 next!!!! It’s a masterpiece!!
If I am remembering correctly, in the book this is based on, "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep", there had been a war that killed most animal life. The remaining life was considered prescious. A lot of the questions were related to killing animals to see if there was a reaction. People with money bought robot animals, like the owl. I think in the book there was a bit where the replicants try to convince the Deckard that they are the humans and he is the replicant. Sorry if I am misremembering, it has been a while. It is a REALLY good book though. The author, Phillip K. Dick, has had a number of his books and stories turned into movies. "Total Recall" is based on the story "I Can Remember It For You Wholesale". Also "The Adjustment Bureau", "Screamers", "Minority Report", "Paycheck", "Next" and the TV series "The Man in the High Castle".
Blade Runner and the Alien Franchise are in the same Universe Tyrell being a competator to Weyland-Yutani
As is Soldier starring Kurt Russel.
@@richjackson2986 Soldier is really underrated. I personally think it is the best representation of non-verbal acting out there. So much is conveyed by Kurt with so few words.
I knew about Soldier, but not about aliens. That's cool
@@RedKytten Yes. It really showed Russell's acting chops.
so, it is a precursor to Firefly. Huh.