Sovereign Citizen Goes FULL IDIOT Over Child Support - Gets WRECKED!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 фев 2025
- Leave a like if you agreed with the judge in this court hearing! 👍
In this fiery court hearing, a deadbeat dad went full sovereign citizen mode, trying every nonsensical tactic to dodge paying child support. The guy rambled about "natural law" and "not recognizing the court's authority," leaving everyone scratching their heads. The judge, clearly unimpressed, shut him down at every turn and openly called out his idiocy. As the dad’s ranting spiraled out of control, he looked more unhinged with every word. Watching him self-destruct while trying to sound smart was equal parts cringe and comedy gold!
Subscribe for more gripping courtroom drama and don’t forget to share your thoughts in the comments-what do you think of this case?
#judgesimpson #courthearings #cases #sovereigncitizen #sovcit #legalproceedings #legal #karen #legalsystem #judicialprocess #courtcase #court #courtroomdrama
Looks like he gave McDonald's his consent plenty of times. 🤣
I didn't realise there were that many to get all that fed
And Burger King , Pizza Hut , Dunkin Donuts and many more !
😂😂
Years from now, his children will see this, and be ashamed of the weasel trying to get out of his responsibilities.
Which is why we need to keep abortion safe, legal, and totally government funded.
@@malcolmbliss777 I'm sure he'd rather pay for 1 abortion than child support for 18 years. The woman probably wants the child and doesn't mind if he pays for it.
He won't care in the least - this level of ignorance is epic...
These judges are super patient with people who have no idea of rules or procedures. It must be cringe to people who are actually in the field of law.
It absolutely is. Read the Appellate Court's ruling dated September 14, 2023.
You entered a contract when you slept with the mother
Good point made. Yes.
He would call it a "special appearance"
@@seanmccauley8865a devine special appearance
I wonder if she have a warrant for his genetic material
Another example of a woman making a real bad life decision. "Fathers" like this should be forced into hard labor to pay for the duration of their child-support responsibilities...
He had no problem donating dna to the mom.
none whatsoever!
😂😂😂
probably without her consent
He keeps threading to “axe “ people - isn’t that illegal assault with a deadly weapon?
That word drives me crazy.
😂
Axst you to dismiss this case 🥴🤪
Yes, he keeps axing but isn't in a safe throwing club.
Assault with deadly grammar
He should have been held in contempt the instant he tried to obfuscate the record in response to stating his name.
Legal scholars will be studying the Big Mac defense for decades.
If they throw in large fries' order, it is a shoe in.
LMAO
If this 3rd grade graduate had done his homework, he’d know this argument has been made in state courts, hundreds of times already, in all 50 states, and never ONCE has it worked.
That would be too much effort - he'd rather listen to his thug buddies...
Except many of these idiots just get their charges dropped, or get a slap on the wrist because courts don't see it as worth the time. To their minds, it means they won. Now, if it was a mandatory 10 year sentence to spout this idiocy, it'd stop real fast.
You signed the contract between the mother and yourself you just used a different type of pen and ink.
Dismissed without prejudice, what he asked for, would allow the whole case to be brought against him again.
However, with the intellect of a turnip, he chooses to plow ahead and keep running his mouth. Yeah, that should work well.
Yes, that's because SovCits have no comprehension of the words they use.
He can't even pronounce most of the words he's attempting to use, let alone understand them.
Moonisipillities?
They always pronounce ASK as AX! Drives me nuts! I teach phonics and grammar/ spelling to 4 th graders! I would have them write ASK a million times if they pronounced it as AX!!
@@ICARE9449If you can't bother to research why certain people talk that way, you're a lousy teacher.
@@cybertoe1221 this is the most brain dead comment I've read all year, and I work in customer support
😅😅😊@@lauracwhitney
He’s “here by special divine appearance “. He thinks he’s Jesus, or he has a 3rd grade education and uses words he doesn’t understand.
A lot of ums in his story. What a clown who is wasting taxpayers money. Pay your child support.
Hey, he's just axing for full disclosure, otherwise it's cohursion!
I would have booted him the first time he said he wanted to axe the court a question. I wish this judge would have made this fool use the correct words for what he was attempting to say.
Not the smoothest rock on the beach.
Maybe the smoothest brain though.
But he's a rock nonetheless...dumb as a rock.
Cohorsion???
"without prejudice" means the state can bring the charge again in a different form. Clearly NOT what he wants.
He is doing a lot of “Axing”
The state has a 100% interest in support as the state would be on the hook for that support if no father present and mother is poor
Wait - without prejudice? He is clearly clueless.
STOP AXING. YOU ARE NOT LIZZIE BORDON!
😂😂😂
"Axing", "Cohorshun", what an incredible vocabulary.
"Um" (I'm a complete dumb ass), "Um" (I have no Idea what I'm talking about) "Um" (Please put me in Jail)...
😊😊
It’s like he’s trying a script that has never worked, but he somehow thinks he is going to be the mastermind that breaks the court! 😂😂
Someone should give hIS ARGUMENT the AX
He looks like he doesn't need to be forced to chow down on a big mac.
Hahahahaha lol
Wonder if he has thought about what his kids will think of this crap in about 10 years time?
That would require foresight and effort - so, no. And, he doesn't really care about what they think...
He said "Aks." Throw the book at him.
That’s just a dialect thing
@@OllyOllieAliPygmalion/My Fair Lady. Theory a low-class guttersnipe could pass in decent society if given instruction in grammar, elocution and manners. Dialect is like wearing a sign on one's forehead, for better or worse.
@@OllyOllieAli No, it's bad grammar.
LOL, a good lawyer would never have taken the case or rather told this guy he couldn't win and pay the child support rather than waste more money on legal fees. And BTW, most lawyers charge more than 10 grand to handle an appeal.
he doesnt even understand that "without prejudice" is not the choice he should be asking for...
This guy talks like a high school student filling a paper with fluff because he can't figure out how to get 1,000 words from his brain and sources onto a page.
The ratio of "ohms" to actual words with meaning is usually 1:9. Unless the paper is about electricity.
"Dismiss without prejudice"? That means that charges can be brought again. He wants them dismissed _with_ prejudice.
Just more proof of his stupidity.
Don't tell him
I suspect he consents to eat Big Macs quite frequently...
What is so difficult about saying the word "ASK"
He's there to Axe you a question judge.
1:11 did he just say… A special, divine appearance? Lol… I’m pretty sure that if Jesus ever had any children… He would pay child support.
"municipilities?"
😂😂😂
"without prejudice" is a legal term meaning a case to be dismissed but the prosecutor is allowed to refile charges at a later date. The SovShit is obviously confused by requesting it.
The only thing to tell a SovCit is simple "PAY YOUR BILLS DEADBEAT!!"
Um, um, um shows he doesn't even believe this garbage
Ask, man, not axe. Dumbell persona
Word.
Sov Citizen spellbook. They think that if they say the right thing the spell with go through.
Just because someone has a D&B number doesn't make it a business. Government agencies used to have D&B numbers but stopped in 2022.
The state should not inject itself into private affairs, but also bro should not inject himself into a lady's woowoo.
That dude is the next United States Supreme Court Chief Justice. 👍
He can’t be. He is not a citizen.
This dude tried to compare McDonald’s rights over you to the government! Pretty sure the IRS without your consent can garnish your check if need be. I mean, he is level one intelligence and needs to go to debate class again.
He has a point there, actually.
Government cannot require you to go to a for-profit business of their choosing, and pay them money.
These drug testing and paternity testing agencies are "chosen" by the government, in exchange for kickbacks.
Then they court order citizens, to give them money. It's super dirty. It's corruption.
Also, it's all done with the aim of getting "matching funds" from the federal government, via title IV-d.
When a mother/family applies for public assistance in Michigan, they first require her to kick dad out of the house and put a child support case on him. So that they can PROFIT from the federal government. It's pretty horrible.
Search something like "title iv-d matching funds" if you don't believe me. It's a really sad and corrupt way to make money, at the expense of the children.
This fellow, like almost every sovereign citizen whose court appearance is on RUclips, tells the judge that “under the constitution, there are only two types of jurisdiction: common law or admiralty [the law of the sea]. Which one of those two types of jurisdiction does this court intend to try me under?”
This is a fallacious argument. It is such a well known and obvious fallacy that it has its own name in studies of logic: the false dilemma fallacy. The false dilemma fallacy occurs when someone misrepresents an issue by offering only two options when more exist. For example, suppose I tell a man I haven’t met before that there are only two types of men-married men and bachelors-and ask him to specify which of these two possibilities applies to him. This is a false question because there is a third possibility that is being ignored: the man could be a widower.
Saying that there are only two types of jurisdiction under the U.S. Constitution, common law or admiralty, and demanding that the court choose one or the other is a false question because there is a third source of jurisdiction (statutory law) and even a fourth source of jurisdiction (administrative agency rule making). Only by starting with the patently false premise that common law and admiralty are the sole possible sources of jurisdiction can one then draw the erroneous - indeed laughable - conclusion that courts lack jurisdiction to adjudicate violations of statutory law. Of course the courts have jurisdiction to do just that.
I'm really waiting for the day when a judge finally simplifies jurisdiction with the, "You're in my house!" line.
My God, the word is "ASKING" not "AXING." The judges should have had him arrested for al the time he threatened to 'AXE' them. :P
I know Judge Judy isn't everyone's cup of tea, but she stops people the minute they start with the "I axed him/her" and tells them an axe is something used to chop firewood and she won't let them continue unless they use the correct word. She also stops people that tell her they were "conversating" with someone. I love it when she tells someone to buy a dictionary and learn how to use it.
This guy reminds me of Dilbert's Wally. He put more effort into avoiding doing his job that would be required to actually do his job.
Ohm, Judge, I axed you to be pacific
Anybody bored yet!!!! He has not a clue what he’s saying… he doesn’t understand… he can’t even pronounce half the words. Just ask him what one word means… he wouldn’t be able to. He’s making a clown of himself 😂
He doesn’t know what kind of court he’s in?
Its part of the script, its supposed to set the judge up for a 'got you' moment. "Oh, you have to follow the US constitution? Here is rule ABC that says I'm exempt."
THE JUDGE SHOULD HAVE SHUT HIM DOWN AFTER 2 MINUTES…
When he says “ummmm” it kills me 😂😂 it’s like watching someone completely obliterate a presentation, but they worked so hard on it you just have to watch 😂😂😂
He's still Axing Judge.
This...person...is a graduate of Internet University School of Law. He graduated at the top of his class and Magnum Iumma Dumb. 😢
Does he actually understand what he is reading?
Oh my God, I'm dying! I cannot believe he used McDonald's as an example for his insane ideas!! "McDonald's can't force me to eat a big Mac! " yup! And we can't force you to have an actual brain! Haven't sovereign citizens learned that their beliefs or whatever you wanna call them are nuts but also very entertaining for the rest of us. Lol.
I'm sure no one forced him to have sex with the mother of the child.
Here's the better analogy: You don't have to contract with McDonald's and eat that Big Mac BUT, if you do, you have to pay them for it.
if he only put this much effort into paying his bills
I think with a good lawyer on this issue he would still lose, so he's at least ahead on lawyer fees
I didn't see where he got wrecked. Also, the opening implied the judge ruled that he had to pay child support. Where was that at?
Why can't people pronounce "asking" correctly. What is axing?
Google it. Educate yourself.
It’s like they went to a school that taught it - all of them - even people here in 🇦🇺. Or they think it’s cool.
No doubt this one has IQ of a hand ball
He's just a bum. Plain and simple
Narrator: Please shut up.
Dodging child support is criminal. What lazy mf! I feel sorry for his kid!
Ommmmm. He is axing for a summary judgement.
A dim bulb in the chandelier.
A nightlight bulb on a dimmer switch.
@@suek7086 Accurate description! Better than mine. 🤣🤣🤣
Questioning jurisdiction or what law then quotes the Michigan Constitution. Guy is a deadbeat idiot.
What tool! Too bad he has no friggin idea what he is actually saying. Just pay the child support and please stay away from the child , hopefully your stupidity will not rub off on the child.
Cahorsion
Everyone is entitled, but no one is responsible. And we wonder why this Constitutional Republic failed?
When they get the warrant for his dna and it comes back positive, will he concede then? Lol
I know you aren't supposed to attack the way someone speaks but when he keeps saying "axin" just bothers me
It's bad enough when these idiots pull this nonsense to get out of things like traffic tickets, but to do this to try to get out of paying child support is truly reprehensible.
3:10 “moving forward” - aka “I got nothing”
I am not even 5 minutes in and I believe this guy is a maroon, as Bugs Bunny would say.
Does he know that, "uhmmm", isn't used in formal speech? No response needed...
“Cohorsion”? “Moonicipilities”? “Sisitive”? “Dat” and “ax”? Do you actually speak English, sir?
Don’t forget “COSENT”
He’s so passionate with his misinterpretation of law. It’s obvious he’s just using his script to get out of paying child support. IMHO people who avoid paying for their children are the lowest of lows.
you're here to 'aks'? What is 'aks'? Oh, you mean 'ask' That word that no black person on earth can say for some strange reason
Wow. While this guy is a complete dumbass it’s pretty ignorant to paint an entire race with one brush. I’m black, my entire family is black,a lot of my coworkers are black. Not one of them have a problem with the word “ask” You should really tuck that in, your ignorance is showing.
I have only talked to a couple of these Sovereign citizens. I haven't seen the videos. But those Sovcits believed that the government establishes a trust fund for everyone born in the United States and puts one billion dollars in each of these funds. This guy thinks he is a billionaire, and he is fighting to keep that fantasy alive.
By the way, he asked that his case be dismissed without prejudice. He meant WITH prejudice. The Sovcit arguments contain all kinds of crazy misinterpretations of the law and its terminology, and all sorts of logical errors, as well as a great number of outright fantasies.
I'm yet to see anyone explain WHY the govt "puts money in a secret account"
I understand they think the govt sells your future labour to foreign govts, but why would they do that and then not spend the money? Why go to all that effort just to leave the money sitting in everyone's secret accounts?
He can quote all this legalese mumbo jumbo but cannot pronounce the word ASK correctly😂
Ignorance is bliss, get advice from a attorney not Google
He looks like he has a "contract" with the Big Mac.....😂🎉..I could be mistaken.
He’s spouting nonsense. It’s word salad along with sovereign word salad. This has never, ever worked, ask Darrell Brooks.
Ooooh! He's there by special _divine_ appearance. That is arrogance typically reserved for heads of state.
It's really sad that his child will watch this someday! And realize he's just trying to weasel out of paying child support and being there for them!
hopefully mom would have gotten her act together and found a real man to be with, and the kids will look at this, shake their heads and laugh.
The long drawn out "ummmmm" every couple of words and the absolute massacre of "coercion" as "cohershun" and that he says "affadavin" in place of "affadavit" makes this just painful to listen to.
Add in that he does't know that an axe is a tool you use to chop wood and it's almost unbearable. Every time he told the judge he was there to axe the court was worse than nails on a chalkboard.
He sure has a lot of nerve to talk this be in the very important court. Especially about this issue. I’d be ashamed and embarrassed!!!
You didn't play the ending of the proceedings. The judge grovel at the feet of the Sovereign and submit to his superior lawyering. The judge granted him everything he asked for and 1 million dollars in gold buillion so he won't lose his judgeship. 😂
I find it strange that a woman can unilaterally decide to abort the pregnancy without asking the father, but the Man has no choice if the mother decides to have the baby.
Why can't men abort our financial responsibilities unilaterally too?
I am curious how the Sov Citizens can justify this nonsense. The Courts are not persuaded by
magic "words!?!"
He filed for this appeal, but he does't consent to this procedurre.
Hes still doesn't get what a court of appeals is.
Representing denied motions as "ignored" is deceptive.
It's up to him to prove he is not the father, and there's only one way to do that.
Sovcits won't pay for car crash damages OR pay for kids created with their generously donated DNA.
If these folks believve they have these "trusts" than why don't they withdraw funds to handle their debts/child support?😊😊
14:29 He obviously doesn't understand the difference between with or without prejudice. 😂