Great video as always!! I'm in the middle of a dilemma on what bindings to put on to these skis to match the Radical boots: Rotation ST 10 vs KingPin vs Tecton. Mostly will be used in the side country but with the possibility of some longer skinning trip in the Spring! !
@@SkiEssentials I agree about the brand "consistency" but I've started thinking more of the Tecton 13 as a safer and a better in power transmission binding.. Not sure yet!
Wondering wether to get this or the Salomon mtn explore 95. This will be my frist touring set up, but ill probably end up using the skis at the resort a bit as well, as the skis i have noe are a little bit short. Any idea what ski would be better?
HI Magnus! I think if any resort skiing is on the table, the Camox FB offers more in that department. It's still light and easy to tour on, just has a bit more of a downhill capability to it from an inbounds perspective. For backcountry exclusive touring, I'd say the Salomon will be more efficient. Have fun! SE
You guys/gals do such great videos that I'm struggling sending in this comment, but here goes.... Maybe I just got used to it from your prior videos, but describing rocker and camber with just a single ski is less appealing than your traditional visual representation with two skis base to base. Again, you guys are awesome, just sharing my perception based upon a few reviews now. Thanks as always for the excellent reviews.
Hi Cam! Some skis, like this Camox, we just didn't get them both for the video. For the most part, we do put them base to base, and certainly agree that is the proper way to show a rocker profile. SE
Great video as always!!
I'm in the middle of a dilemma on what bindings to put on to these skis to match the Radical boots: Rotation ST 10 vs KingPin vs Tecton.
Mostly will be used in the side country but with the possibility of some longer skinning trip in the Spring! !
I'd say the Rotation is a good match to that ski and boot combo. Nice to stay within brand, I feel.
@@SkiEssentials I agree about the brand "consistency" but I've started thinking more of the Tecton 13 as a safer and a better in power transmission binding.. Not sure yet!
Can you please do an Mentis Freebird Review? And can you go into how it carves as an 80mm underfoot?
It does look very interesting! We'll try to get to it this season.
Wondering wether to get this or the Salomon mtn explore 95. This will be my frist touring set up, but ill probably end up using the skis at the resort a bit as well, as the skis i have noe are a little bit short. Any idea what ski would be better?
HI Magnus!
I think if any resort skiing is on the table, the Camox FB offers more in that department. It's still light and easy to tour on, just has a bit more of a downhill capability to it from an inbounds perspective. For backcountry exclusive touring, I'd say the Salomon will be more efficient. Have fun!
SE
You guys/gals do such great videos that I'm struggling sending in this comment, but here goes.... Maybe I just got used to it from your prior videos, but describing rocker and camber with just a single ski is less appealing than your traditional visual representation with two skis base to base. Again, you guys are awesome, just sharing my perception based upon a few reviews now. Thanks as always for the excellent reviews.
Hi Cam!
Some skis, like this Camox, we just didn't get them both for the video. For the most part, we do put them base to base, and certainly agree that is the proper way to show a rocker profile.
SE
Can I use this skis if im 1.74cm if the skis are 1.78.5cm ??
Sure! It's light so if you're looking to upsize, this is a good ski to do it on.
@@SkiEssentials. HI, finally I got skis Black diamond Boundaries of 1.84cm and Im 1.74cm ... Still good if are 10cm gigher than me? thank you!